Extent and zonal distribution of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in patients with prostatic carcinoma in Japan: analysis of whole-mounted prostatectomy specimens

BACKGROUND: Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), an intraluminar proliferation of epithelial cells in ducts and acini, is divided into high-grade (HGPIN) and low-grade (LGPIN), based on morphologies. HGPIN is considered to be a putative precursor of prostatic adenocarcinoma (PCA). Information on PIN has been limited in Japan, because PIN had not been regarded as a precursor lesion for PCA. METHODS: In this study, extent and zonal distribution of PIN together with its relationship with PCA were examined in totally embedded radical prostatectomy specimens obtained from 70 patients with PCA. Fifty-three patients received androgen deprivation therapy (castrated) and remaining 17 did not (noncastrated). RESULTS: Frequency of HGPIN in noncastrated cases (76%) was much higher than that in castrated cases (26%) (P < 0.001). LGPIN showed the same tendency, but the difference was smaller. Difference in mean number of HGPIN in noncastrated and castrated cases (12.0 and 6.4, respectively) was more marked than in LGPIN (6.4 and 5.1, respectively). Reduction rate of mean size in HGPIN (26%) by the androgen deprivation therapy was larger than in LGPIN. When evaluated in noncastrated cases, the coexistence of PCA and HGPIN was found in 76% of cases in the nontransition and 53% in the transition zone. Close association of PCA and PIN (相似文献   

PSP94 expression after androgen deprivation therapy: a comparative study with prostate specific antigen in benign prostate and prostate cancer

PURPOSE: To examine the clinical use of PSP94 (prostate secretory protein of 94 amino acids) as an androgen independent marker, we conducted a comparative study of prostate samples including benign tissue and cancers which did and did not have androgen deprivation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Among 163 radical prostatectomy cases 75 had androgen deprivation before operation, while surgery was performed in the remainder without prior hormone treatment. Considering the pathological up grading following hormone therapy, contiguous sections from radical prostatectomy samples were stained for PSP94 and prostate specific antigen (PSA) by immunohistochemistry, and equivalent tumor foci were evaluated by assessing the intensity and extent of the staining. RESULTS: In untreated benign prostate tissue PSP94 and PSA staining was positive and identical in all sections in the no pretreatment group. However, PSP94 expression in the androgen deprivation group was significantly higher than PSA in intensity (p = 0.0005) and extent (p = 0.034). In untreated cancer cases PSP94 intensity and extent demonstrated strong inverse association with Gleason grade (p <0.0001). In contrast, PSA expression was high in every grade, resulting in no statistical association with tumor grade. In the androgen deprivation group PSA staining was decreased in every grade compared to the no pretreatment group. On the other hand, PSP94 expression was decreased in grade 3 tumor foci but increased in grades 4 and 5 tumor foci compared with samples of the corresponding grade in the no pretreatment group (p = 0.0034). CONCLUSIONS: PSP94 expression in benign prostate persists under androgen deprivation compared to PSA. PSP94 synthesis in high grade tumor appears to be activated in the absence of androgen stimulation, indicating the possible alternative pathways in the regulation of PSP94.     

Clinical outcome of patients with lymph node positive prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy versus androgen deprivation

OBJECTIVE(S): To compare the outcome of patients with stage D1 (TxN+M0) prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy or androgen deprivation alone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty-two patients treated for lymph node positive prostate cancer were retrospectively analyzed for time to progression, tumor-specific and overall survival. Furthermore, subsequent tumor and treatment related morbidity requiring intervention including frequency and duration of associated hospital stays was recorded. RESULTS: The extent of lymph node metastasis was significantly lower in 50 patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (+/- early androgen deprivation) compared to 32 receiving androgen deprivation only. The treatment groups, however, did not differ with regard to other characteristics including age, comorbidity, stage, grade and preoperative PSA. Mean actuarial progression-free, and tumor-specific survival was significantly longer for the radical prostatectomy patients (36% and 47%, respectively at 10 years) compared to androgen deprivation (15% and 32%, respectively). The latter group required more secondary interventions resulting in more frequent and overall longer hospital stays. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for stage D1 prostate cancer possibly benefit with regard to the necessity for secondary interventions and, at least for limited (solitary) nodal disease, in terms of progression-free and tumor-specific survival. However, the latter observation may be biased by a larger extent of lymph node metastasis in the androgen deprivation group.     

Early results of radical prostatectomy and adjuvant endocrine therapy for prostate cancer with or without preoperative androgen deprivation

Background : The effects of preoperative androgen deprivation were explored in the patients who received radical prostatectomy and subsequent adjuvant endocrine therapy for prostate cancer.
Methods: Stage A₂, B or C prostate cancers were randomized to one of two groups: (i) group I ( n = 90), who received androgen deprivation (leuploride and chlormadinone acetate) for 3 months preoperatively followed by radical prostatectomy and adjuvant endocrine therapy (leuploride only); and (ii) group II ( n = 86), who underwent the surgery followed by 3 month androgen deprivation and subsequent adjuvant endocrine therapy. The effects of preoperative androgen deprivation on clinical relapse (serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) > 1.98 ng/mL, local recurrence or distant metastasis) and PSA relapse (PSA > 0.2 ng/mL) were evaluated at 2 years after randomization.
Results: There was no significant difference in clinical or PSA relapse-free survival and quality of life measures between the two groups, although relapses occurred significantly more frequently in patients who had more advanced stages, higher pretreatment PSA values or lower histologic differentiation in either group. Subgroup analysis indicated that clinical relapse-free survival in stage C cancer tended to be better in patients with preoperative androgen deprivation than in those patients without it ( P < 0.1).
Conclusions : Preoperative androgen deprivation may be beneficial for stage C prostate cancer patients receiving radical prostatectomy and adjuvant endocrine therapy over the 2 year observation period. A longer follow up is needed to clarify the exact extent of benefit in terms of survival and quality of life.     

Radical prostatectomy and adjuvant endocrine therapy for prostate cancer with or without preoperative androgen deprivation: Five-year results

BACKGROUND: The effects of preoperative androgen deprivation on the outcomes of prostate cancer patients who received radical prostatectomy and subsequent adjuvant endocrine therapy have not yet been fully evaluated. METHODS: Patients with stage A(2), B or C prostate cancers were randomized to one of two groups: group I (n = 90), who received androgen deprivation (leuprolide and chlormadinone acetate) for 3 months followed by radical prostatectomy and subsequent adjuvant endocrine therapy (leuprolide alone), and group II (n = 86), who underwent the surgery followed by 3-month androgen deprivation (leuprolide and chlormadinone acetate) and subsequent adjuvant endocrine therapy (leuprolide alone). The effects of preoperative androgen deprivation on survival, clinical relapse (serum prostate specific antigen, PSA, above the normal level, local recurrence, or distant metastases), and PSA relapse (PSA above the detectable level) were evaluated at 5 years or later after treatment. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in overall, cause-specific, clinical relapse-free, or PSA relapse-free survival rates between the two groups. In a subanalysis, no prostate cancer deaths or clinical relapses were noted in 29 patients with organ-confined disease (OCD: negativity of capsular invasion, seminal vesicle invasion, surgical margins or nodal involvement). The odds ratio for OCD depending on group assignment was 2.44 (95% confidence interval, CI 1.04-5.72), for group I, demonstrating a higher probability of having OCD. This ratio was increased to 4.00 (95% CI 1.06-15.16) if the analysis was conducted in a subpopulation with prostate specific antigen levels less than 35.6 ng/mL and with clinical stage B or C cancers. CONCLUSION: Preoperative androgen deprivation has no demonstrable benefit in 5-year outcomes for patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and adjuvant endocrine therapy. However, it did increase the probability of OCD, which was associated with no clinical relapse during the follow-up. A longer observation is needed to clarify the exact extent of the benefits in terms of survival.     

Neoadjuvant androgen ablation before radical prostatectomy in cT2bNxMo prostate cancer: 5-year results.

PURPOSE: In the initial report of the Lupron Depot Neoadjuvant Prostate Cancer Study Group patients who received 3 months of androgen deprivation had a significant decrease in the positive margin rate. We monitored these patients for 5 years and to our knowledge present the longest followup of any neoadjuvant trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multi-institutional prospective randomized trial was performed between February 1992 and April 1994 involving patients with stage cT2b prostate cancer, including 138 who received 3 months of leuprolide plus flutamide before radical prostatectomy and 144 who underwent radical prostatectomy only. Patients were followed every 6 months with serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) testing for 5 years. Biochemical recurrence was defined as PSA greater than 0.4 ng./ml. RESULTS: At 5 years there was no difference in the biochemical recurrence rate. PSA was less than 0.4 ng./ml. in 64.8% of the patients in the neoadjuvant androgen ablation plus prostatectomy and 67.6% in the prostatectomy only group (p = 0.663). CONCLUSIONS: Although 3 months of androgen deprivation before radical prostatectomy resulted in an apparently significant decrease in positive surgical margins, a 5-year followup does not indicate any difference in the recurrence rate. Until studies document improvement in biochemical or clinical recurrence with longer periods of treatment, induction androgen deprivation before radical prostatectomy is not indicated.     

Predictors of secondary cancer treatment in patients receiving local therapy for prostate cancer: data from cancer of the prostate strategic urologic research endeavor

PURPOSE: Secondary cancer treatment is common after definitive local therapy for prostate cancer and it may be an indicator of the efficacy and cost of primary local treatment. We determined predictors of secondary cancer treatment in patients initially treated with radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined 2,336 patients in Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor, a longitudinal registry of patients with prostate cancer, who underwent initial treatment with radical prostatectomy (1,744) or external beam radiation (592). Patients had at least 1 month of followup and all pretreatment information was available. The percent of patients receiving secondary cancer treatment, time to secondary treatment and type of secondary treatment delivered was determined. Multivariate analysis was done to determine independent predictors of secondary cancer treatment. In patients initially treated with prostatectomy a similar analysis was performed to identify predictors of receiving androgen deprivation versus radiation. RESULTS: A total of 590 patients (25%) received secondary cancer treatment, including prostatectomy in 391 (22%) and radiation in 199 (34%). Secondary cancer treatment was equally divided between radiation and androgen deprivation in 52% and 47%, respectively, of those initially treated with prostatectomy, while 92% initially treated with radiation received androgen deprivation. Predictors of any secondary treatment included patient age, biopsy Gleason score and prostate specific antigen at diagnosis. There was a trend toward increased secondary treatment more than 6 months after local therapy in patients initially treated with radiation. Increased age and lymph node metastases were independent predictors of receiving androgen deprivation after prostatectomy, while there was increased use of radiation in patients with positive surgical margins or extracapsular disease extension. CONCLUSIONS: Secondary treatment differs in patients initially treated with radical prostatectomy and radiation. Pretreatment factors can be used to counsel patients regarding the likelihood of secondary treatment, while age and prostatectomy results appear to determine the type of secondary treatment in those initially treated with prostatectomy.     

Postatrophic hyperplasia of the prostate in Japan: histologic and immunohistochemical features and p53 gene mutation analysis

BACKGROUND: Postatrophic hyperplasia (PAH) is one of the patterns of prostatic atrophy but has been regarded as a precursor of prostatic cancer (PCA) because of its possible increase in proliferative activity compared with simple atrophy and morphologic mimicry of PCA. METHODS: Radical prostatectomy specimens obtained from 28 patients with PCA were analyzed by histologic and immunohistochemical methods by using 34 beta E12 and Ki-67 as primary antibodies. Tissue from PAH, PCA, high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN), a possible precursor of PCA, and benign hyperplasia were microdissected and p53 gene mutations were examined by the polymerase chain reaction-single strand conformation polymorphism method followed by direct sequencing. RESULTS: Histologically, PAH consists of compactly arranged small acini with irregular atrophic-appearing contours, mimicking PCA. PAH lesions were detected in 7 (25%) of 28 cases with PCA: multifocal in 6 of 7 (85.7%) cases, maximum size of lesions ranged from 0.3 to 2.3 mm. Mild nuclear enlargement and small nucleoli were observed in all cases. Capsular or perineural invasion, crystalloids, and mitotic figures were not found in any case. Inflammatory changes and fibrosis near PAH were found in 100% and 71% of cases, respectively. PAH involved non-transition zone in all cases and occasionally involved transition zone. Forty-three percent of PAH lesions were in proximity (<2 mm) to PCA. None of the clinical and pathologic factors examined were correlated with the presence of PAH. Immunohistochemical analysis by using 34 beta E12 revealed intact basal cells. Proliferative activity defined by positive rate for labeling with MIB-1 antibody was intermediate between benign prostatic hyperplasia and HGPIN. The frequency of p53 mutations in PAH lesions was 5.3%, which was similar to that in HGPIN lesions (4.2%). Benign glands never showed mutations. CONCLUSION: These findings suggested that PAH might be a precursor for PCA.     

保留神经血管束的耻骨后前列腺癌根治术的疗效观察

目的：小结开展保留神经血管束的耻骨后前列腺癌根治术（RRP）的经验和教训。方法：对40例穿刺活检证实的前列腺癌患者行RRP,术前采用新辅助治疗,术中采用保护尿道膜部括约肌和前列腺侧旁神经血管束,并在重建膀胱颈部粘膜充分外翻后的后壁行折叠缝合1针。间断、无张力行残留尿道和外翻的膀胱颈缝合。结果：经3～78个月随访,全部患者排尿通畅,无肿瘤复发;除2例发生轻度尿失禁外,余38例在6个月内均恢复尿控能力。结论：充分做好耻骨后前列腺癌根治术前的准备工作,有利于手术操作;术中保护好尿道膜部括约肌和前列腺侧旁神经血管束,在充分外翻膀胱粘膜的重建膀胱颈后壁折叠缝合,能减少前列腺癌根治术后尿失禁的发生。     

Significance of androgen deprivation prior to radical prostatectomy,with special reference to prostate-specific antigen

Summary A total of 37 selected patients with clinical stage T2b or T3 prostate cancer received androgen deprivation prior to radical retropubic prostatectomy. A luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) analog alone was given to 15 individuals; 19 received an LHRH analog with flutamide. Three underwent bilateral orchiectomy instead of chemical castration. The duration of androgen deprivation prior to radical prostatectomy varied from 3 to 16 months, with 31 individuals undergoing induction therapy for 3–6 months. Three received androgen deprivation for more than 1 year. In all, 15 patients had clinical stage T2b disease and 22, stage T3 prostate cancer. The prostate size decreased approximately 30%–50% following induction therapy. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values decreased in all 19 instances where this was obtained. In all, 6 of 15 (40%) patients with clinical T2b lesions and 9 of 22 (41%) with clinical T3 tumors had a positive surgical margin; 5 (13%) had 1 or more positive lymph nodes. Androgen deprivation was continued following surgery in 13 cases. Only one patient received postoperative radiation therapy. After a mean follow-up period of 33 months, 35 (95%) patients are alive. Two patients died, one of poorly differentiated prostate cancer with subsequent metastasis and one of a myocardial infarction 33 months after surgery without showing any evidence of disease. Of 23 patients without postoperative adjuvant therapy, 6 (26,1%) progressed (PSA level, >0.4 ng/ml). None of the patients who underwent adjuvant therapy progressed over a follow-up period of 6–75 months (mean, 38 months). Although the low incidence of positive lymph nodes and the apparent reduction in tumor size after androgen deprivation are encouraging, the benefits of this approach must await the completion of ongoing randomized trials.     

Transrectal ultrasonography in stage A prostate cancer: detection of residual tumor after transurethral resection of prostate.

To evaluate the ability of transrectal ultrasonography to detect residual cancer in the prostate gland after transurethral resection in patients with stage A cancer, we studied 38 patients with stage A disease (11 stage A1 and 27 stage A2) in whom transrectal ultrasonography was done at least 3 weeks after resection. Each patient underwent radical prostatectomy, and residual cancer was present in 97% of the specimens (peripheral zone cancer in 95% and transition zone cancer in 61%). At sonography we identified hypoechoic areas suggestive of cancer in 10 patients (26%). In the pathological specimen residual cancer was present at the hypoechoic area in 8 of these cases (positive predictive value 80%). In a retrospective review of the sonograms we identified 25 hypoechoic lesions greater than 5 mm. in diameter, including 15 that corresponded to cancer in the radical prostatectomy specimens (positive predictive value 60%). Granulomas due to the transurethral resection were found in 92% of the radical prostatectomy specimens but none appeared hypoechoic on ultrasound. A total of 103 separate cancers was identified in the whole mount step sections of the radical prostatectomy specimens (2.7 cancers per patient). Of the 103 separate cancers 54 were less than 0.1 cc in volume and none of these could be identified in the retrospective review of the sonograms, 37 were 0.1 to 1.0 cc and 5 of these (14%) appeared hypoechoic, and 12 were greater than 1.0 cc and 10 of these (83%) appeared hypoechoic. Hypoechoic lesions greater than 5 mm. in diameter in the transition zone proved to be cancer in 47% of the cases, while 88% of similar lesions in the peripheral zone proved to be cancer. We conclude that suspicious-appearing hypoechoic lesions suggestive of cancer, whether in the peripheral zone or the transition zone, should be biopsied before expectant management of stage A prostate cancer is considered. Transrectal ultrasonography is useful for restaging after transurethral resection and for evaluating the extent of residual cancer in stages A1 and A2 prostate cancer.     

Zonal origin of localized prostate cancer does not affect the rate of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether transition zone (TZ) prostate cancers demonstrate different rates of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy compared to peripheral zone (PZ) cancers. METHODS: In 1262 consecutive patients treated with radical prostatectomy, computerized planimetry defined tumour origin as either TZ tumours (>70% TZ location) or PZ. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox regression models tested the association between zonal origin and the rate of biochemical recurrence (prostate-specific antigen >0.1ng/ml and rising). We used the Harrell's concordance index to quantify the accuracy of various Cox regression models. RESULTS: TZ prostate cancers were diagnosed in 115 patients (9.1%). Biochemical recurrence was recorded in 16 TZ and in 201 PZ prostate cancers patients. In multivariate Cox models, the rate of biochemical recurrence was not significantly different between TZ and PZ prostate cancers (p=0.4). Combined multivariate predictive accuracy of biochemical recurrence predictions was 81.2% accurate when zonal origin was included versus 81.0% when zonal origin was omitted. CONCLUSIONS: The zonal origin of prostate cancers does not affect the rate of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.     

Utility of immunohistochemical detection of prostate-specific Ets for the diagnosis of benign and malignant prostatic epithelial lesions

BACKGROUND: Human prostate-specific Ets (hPSE) belongs to the Ets family. It regulates the proliferation, differentiation, and development of prostate epithelial cells. A recent study showed that hPSE can be detected in normal glands but not in cell lines established from prostate cancer (PCA), suggesting a translational disorder of hPSE from mRNA to protein in PCA. Immunohistochemical detection of hPSE could therefore be another method of differential diagnosis of PCA from other proliferative conditions in the prostate. METHODS: An immunohistochemical detection of hPSE was carried out on the whole mounted prostatectomy specimen obtained from 19 cases with PCA. RESULTS: Basal and secretory luminar cells showed a diffuse cytoplasmic staining for hPSE in normal glands, hyperplastic glands, and prostate intraepithelial neoplasia lesions. Whereas approximately 30% of PCA lesions showed a negative staining for hPSE, the positive rate for hPSE between PCA and benign glands or prostate intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Staining intensities in normal glands, hyperplastic glands, and PIN lesions were similar, but generally stronger than those in PCA lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Negative immunoreactivity for hPSE strongly suggests malignancy in the prostate glands. Decreased immunoreactivities of glands for hPSE could suggest PCA.     

Prostate specific antigen doubling time after radical prostatectomy: effect of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy

PURPOSE: We determined the predictors of prostate specific antigen (PSA) doubling time in patients with relapse after radical prostatectomy as well as whether PSA doubling time is shorter in those treated versus not treated with neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We calculated PSA doubling time in 204 patients with PSA relapse after radical prostatectomy who were or were not treated with neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy. Analysis of covariance was used to determine the effect of clinical and pathological parameters on PSA doubling time, and the proportion of variability explained by these parameters. RESULTS: Clinical stage, and combined clinical stage and margin status, clinical stage and androgen deprivation therapy status, androgen deprivation therapy status and time to PSA relapse, and androgen deprivation therapy status and pretreatment PSA were significant predictors of PSA doubling time. Any variable or combination of variables explained up to only 21% of PSA doubling time variability. When stratified by pretreatment PSA, clinical stage and biopsy grade, the difference in doubling times in patients treated with or without neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy was significant only for 4.1 to 10 ng./ml. PSA. In this group mean doubling time plus or minus standard deviation in patients receiving neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy and those treated only with radical prostatectomy was 7.6+/-1.0 and 15.4+/-2.6 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that it is difficult to predict PSA doubling time in an individual. The small proportion of variability in PSA doubling time explained by the interaction of androgen deprivation therapy status and other variables indicates that these factors are not clinically significant.     

Luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists and meningioma: a treatment dilemma

The relative contraindication of hormonal therapy for patients with prostate cancer and a history of meningioma has not been widely emphasized. Using immunohistochemistry to determine the presence of hormone receptors in meningioma specimens proved potentially valuable in 2 patients with biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy who were being considered for androgen deprivation therapy. These cases also highlight the need for caution against assuming that skull-based intracranial growths in patients receiving hormonal therapy for prostate cancer are metastatic lesions rather than hormonally induced primary tumors.     

Clinical significance of nonpalpable prostate cancer with favorable biopsy features in Japanese men

OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical significance of nonpalpable localized prostate cancers with relatively favorable six sextant biopsy features in Japanese men. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 136 nonpalpable prostate cancers of which biopsy features confined to (1) a Gleason score of 6 or less, (2) one or two positive cores per six sextant cores, and (3) 50% or less involvement of any positive core were collected. The Gleason score, tumor extension, and cancer volume were compared with preoperative serum PSA and PSA density for the patients who underwent radical prostatectomy. PSA doubling time was measured for the patients who were treated expectantly. RESULTS: Treatments chosen for 136 patients with favorable biopsy features were radical prostatectomy alone for 48 and with preoperative androgen deprivation for 30, radiation to the prostate for 12, androgen deprivation therapy for 21, and watchful waiting for 25. Of 48 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy without androgen deprivation therapy, 25% had nonorgan-confined cancers. Seven cancers (14.6%) were Gleason score of 7, but no cancers were 8 or greater. Among 42 prostatectomy specimens for which cancer volume was measured, 22 (52.4%) had cancer volume >0.5 cm(3). Pretreatment serum PSA levels were correlated neither with the Gleason score, tumor extension nor cancer volume. There was only one nonorgan-confined cancer in the 23 cancers for which PSA density was <0.2 ng/ml/g. The ability of PSA density to predict cancer volume <0. 5 cm(3) was 0.61 using a cut-off of 0.2 ng/ml/g. Of the 25 patients treated expectantly, the PSA doubling time was less than 2 years for 3 patients, while it was stable or fluctuated for 13. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor extension can be predicted based on PSA density in nonpalpable prostate cancer with favorable biopsy features, but predictability of cancer volume based on PSA or PSA density is not satisfactorily high. New parameters or biomarkers that complement needle biopsy findings are needed to predict clinical significance of T1c prostate cancer with favorable biopsy features.     

前列腺摘除术与去势术前后雄激素变化的研究

目的探讨和研究前列腺摘除术与去势术对血清中雄激素(T、FT、DHT)的变化。方法39例研究对象,其中23例前列腺摘除术,16例去势术在手术前后分别采集血清样本,用放射免疫法测定血清中T、FT、DHT浓度。结果 前列腺摘除术后血清中T、FT、DHT分别较术前下降34.45％,33.53％,50.41％;去势术后血清中T、FT、DHT分别较术前下降92.27％,92.26％,58.36％。两种手术前后血清中T、FT、DHT的变化都有显著的统计学意义(P<0.001)。结论 前列腺摘除术后血清中雄激素会发生明显的变化,以DHT改变为显著。而去势术能够去除绝大部分T、FT,而DHT仅下降58.36%,在雄激素依赖的前列腺癌病例应当继续使用雄激素受体竞争剂,阻止残存的雄激素作用。     

Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and endocrine manipulation.

Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) is the most common precursor lesion of prostatic adenocarcinoma. In 50- to 70-year-old participants of a randomized screening program for prostate cancer (Rotterdam section of the ERSPC) the frequency of high-grade PIN as an isolated finding in sextant prostatic needle biopsies was estimated to be about 1%. As yet, data in literature on the impact of androgen deprivation on PIN lesions are limited, showing discrepant outcomes. In part this may be the consequence of the application of different criteria for the identification of PIN under conditions of androgen deprivation. Foci of PIN could be distinguished in the majority of radical prostatectomy specimens of men treated for 3 or 6 months with combined endocrine therapy. Endocrine manipulation led to architectural changes (remodelling) in residual PIN which were more pronounced at 6 months of endocrine therapy. This is consistent with a prolonged effect of androgen deprivation on this precursor lesion. The presence of MIB-1 immunopositive nuclei in PIN lesions suggests that they still have the potential to expand after cessation of therapy.     

The impact of prior radical prostatectomy in men with metastatic castration recurrent prostate cancer: a pooled analysis of 9 Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trials

PURPOSE: A prior report suggested that radical prostatectomy may confer a survival advantage to patients with metastatic castration recurrent prostate cancer. Therefore, a pooled analysis of 9 trials performed by Cancer and Leukemia Group B was done to determine if men with metastatic castration recurrent prostate cancer who underwent prior prostatectomy had improved clinical outcomes, such as overall, prostate specific, progression-free and PSA progression-free survival, than men who did not undergo prior prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from 9 multi-institutional trials performed by Cancer and Leukemia Group B were combined. Eligible patients had progressive prostate cancer during androgen deprivation therapy, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2, and adequate hematological, renal and hepatic functions. The proportional hazards model was used to assess the prognostic importance of radical prostatectomy for predicting clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Of 1,238 men 310 (25%) underwent prostatectomy. Median survival was 14.7 (95% CI 12.9-16.7) and 14.5 months (95% CI 13.5-15.7) in men who did and did not undergo prostatectomy, respectively. The HR for death was 1.03 (95% CI 0.90-1.19, p = 0.65) in men with vs without prostatectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Prior prostatectomy in men with metastatic castration recurrent prostate cancer who were subsequently enrolled on clinical trials for cancer treatment had similar survival compared to men who did not undergo prior prostatectomy. These data do not support another report suggesting that prior prostatectomy confers a subsequent survival advantage in men with castration recurrent prostate cancer.