Sotrastaurin,a Novel Small Molecule Inhibiting Protein Kinase C: First Clinical Results in Renal‐Transplant Recipients

Sotrastaurin, a novel protein‐kinase‐C inhibitor, blocks early T‐cell activation. In this 12‐month, Phase II study, de novo renal‐transplant patients were randomized to sotrastaurin (200 mg b.i.d.) + standard‐exposure tacrolimus (SET) or reduced‐exposure tacrolimus (RET) (SET: n = 76; RET: n = 66), or control (SET + mycophenolic acid [MPA, 720 mg b.i.d.]; n = 74). In both sotrastaurin groups, patients were converted from tacrolimus to MPA after Month 3, achieving calcineurin inhibitor‐free immunosuppression. The primary endpoint was composite efficacy failure (treated biopsy‐proven acute rejection, graft loss, death or loss to follow‐up). The key secondary endpoint was glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Composite efficacy failure rates were: 4.1%, 5.4% and 1.5% at Month 3 (preconversion) and 7.8%, 44.8% and 34.1% at study end in the control, sotrastaurin + SET and sotrastaurin + RET groups, respectively; these results led to premature study discontinuation. Median GFR at Month 6 was: 57.0, 53.0 and 60.0 mL/min/1.73 m², respectively. Study‐drug discontinuations due to adverse events occurred in 16.2%, 18.4% and 12.1%, respectively. Leukopenia and neutropenia occurred more frequently preconversion in control versus sotrastaurin groups: 13.7%, 5.6%, and 4.6%; and 11.1%, 4.3% and 3.1%, respectively. The initial sotrastaurin + tacrolimus regimen was efficacious and well tolerated but the postconversion sotrastaurin + MPA regimen showed inadequate efficacy. Longer‐term evaluation of sotrastaurin + tacrolimus is warranted.     

Efficacy of Sotrastaurin Plus Tacrolimus After De Novo Kidney Transplantation: Randomized,Phase II Trial Results

Sotrastaurin, a novel immunosuppressant, blocks early T cell activation through protein kinase C inhibition. Efficacy and safety of sotrastaurin with tacrolimus were assessed in a dose‐ranging non‐inferiority study in renal transplant recipients. A total of 298 patients were randomized 1:1:1:1 to receive sotrastaurin 100 (n = 77; discontinued in December 2011) or 200 mg (n = 73) b.i.d. plus standard tacrolimus (sTAC; 5–12 ng/mL), sotrastaurin 300 mg (n = 75) b.i.d. plus reduced tacrolimus (rTAC; 2–5 ng/mL) or enteric‐coated mycophenolic acid (MPA) plus sTAC (n = 73); all patients received basiliximab and corticosteroids. Composite efficacy failure (treated biopsy‐proven acute rejection ≥ grade IA, graft loss, death or loss to follow up) rates at Month 12 were 18.8%, 12.4%, 10.9% and 14.0% for the sotrastaurin 100, 200 and 300 mg, and MPA groups, respectively. The median estimated glomerular filtration rates were 55.7, 53.3, 64.9 and 59.2 mL/min, respectively. Mean heart rates were faster with higher sotrastaurin doses and discontinuations due to adverse events and gastrointestinal adverse events were more common. Fewer patients in the sotrastaurin groups experienced leukopenia than in the MPA group (1.3–5.5% vs. 16.5%). Sotrastaurin 200 and 300 mg had comparable efficacy to MPA in prevention of rejection with no significant difference in renal function between the groups.     

A multicenter, randomized trial of increased mycophenolic acid dose using enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium with reduced tacrolimus exposure in maintenance kidney transplant recipients

Mycophenolic acid (MPA) dose is frequently reduced in tacrolimus-treated kidney transplant patients, but alternatively the recommended MPA dose can be maintained with reduced tacrolimus exposure. In a 6-month, multicenter, randomized, openlabel study, maintenance kidney transplant patients receiving MPA (mycophenolate mofetil 1g/d or enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) 720 mg/d) and tacrolimus were randomized to convert to EC-MPS 1,440 mg/d with reduced tacrolimus (n = 46), or receive EC-MPS 720 mg/d with unchanged tacrolimus (n = 48). Mean estimated GFR (eGFR, aMDRD) at Month 6 was 49.1 ± 11.1 and 44.7 ± 11.5 ml/min/1.73 m2 in the EC-MPS 1,440 mg and 720 mg groups, respectively (p = 0.07). The primary endpoint, change in eGFR from Day 0 to Month 6, was 2.48 ± 0.95 ml/min/1.73 m2 with EC-MPS 1,440 mg and -0.48 ± 0.93 ml/min/1.73 m2 with EC-MPS 720 mg (difference 2.96 ml/min/1.73 m2; 95% CI 0.32 - 5.60; p = 0.028). There were no deaths, graft losses or acute rejections. Adverse events were more frequent with EC-MPS 1,440 mg than 720 mg (66.7% vs. 44.7%, p = 0.034). Adverse events with suspected relation to EC-MPS occurred in 26.7% and 21.3% of patients, respectively (p = 0.59). Conversion of kidney transplant patients to increased MPA dosing using EC-MPS 1,440 mg/d, with reduced tacrolimus exposure, appears an effective immunosuppression strategy and may improve renal function. Adverse events overall, but not those with a suspected relation to EC-MPS, were higher with ECMPS 1,440 mg/d.     

Everolimus With Reduced Tacrolimus Improves Renal Function in De Novo Liver Transplant Recipients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

In a prospective, multicenter, open‐label study, de novo liver transplant patients were randomized at day 30±5 to (i) everolimus initiation with tacrolimus elimination (TAC Elimination) (ii) everolimus initiation with reduced‐exposure tacrolimus (EVR+Reduced TAC) or (iii) standard‐exposure tacrolimus (TAC Control). Randomization to TAC Elimination was terminated prematurely due to a higher rate of treated biopsy‐proven acute rejection (tBPAR). EVR+Reduced TAC was noninferior to TAC Control for the primary efficacy endpoint (tBPAR, graft loss or death at 12 months posttransplantation): 6.7% versus 9.7% (?3.0%; 95% CI ?8.7, 2.6%; p<0.001 for noninferiority [12% margin]). tBPAR occurred in 2.9% of EVR+Reduced TAC patients versus 7.0% of TAC Controls (p = 0.035). The change in adjusted estimated GFR from randomization to month 12 was superior with EVR+Reduced TAC versus TAC Control (difference 8.50 mL/min/1.73 m², 97.5% CI 3.74, 13.27 mL/min/1.73 m², p<0.001 for superiority). Drug discontinuation for adverse events occurred in 25.7% of EVR+Reduced TAC and 14.1% of TAC Controls (relative risk 1.82, 95% CI 1.25, 2.66). Relative risk of serious infections between the EVR+Reduced TAC group versus TAC Controls was 1.76 (95% CI 1.03, 3.00). Everolimus facilitates early tacrolimus minimization with comparable efficacy and superior renal function, compared to a standard tacrolimus exposure regimen 12 months after liver transplantation.     

Everolimus Plus Reduced‐Exposure CsA versus Mycophenolic Acid Plus Standard‐Exposure CsA in Renal‐Transplant Recipients

Everolimus allows calcineurin‐inhibitor reduction without loss of efficacy and may improve renal‐transplant outcomes. In a 24‐month, open‐label study, 833 de novo renal‐transplant recipients were randomized to everolimus 1.5 or 3.0 mg/day (target troughs 3–8 and 6–12 ng/mL, respectively) with reduced‐exposure CsA, or mycophenolic acid (MPA) 1.44 g/day plus standard‐exposure CsA. Patients received basiliximab ± corticosteroids. The primary endpoint was composite efficacy failure (treated biopsy‐proven acute rejection, graft loss, death or loss to follow‐up) and the main safety endpoint was renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR], by Modification of Diet in Renal Disease [MDRD]) at Month 12 (last‐observation‐carried‐forward analyses). Month 12 efficacy failure rates were noninferior in the everolimus 1.5 mg (25.3%) and 3.0 mg (21.9%) versus MPA (24.2%) groups. Mean eGFR at Month 12 was noninferior in the everolimus groups versus the MPA group (54.6 and 51.3 vs 52.2 mL/min/1.73 m² in the everolimus 1.5 mg, 3.0 mg and MPA groups, respectively; 95% confidence intervals for everolimus 1.5 mg and 3.0 mg vs MPA: ?1.7, 6.4 and ?5.0, 3.2, respectively). The overall incidence of adverse events was comparable between groups. The use of everolimus with progressive reduction in CsA exposure, up to 60% at 1 year, resulted in similar efficacy and renal function compared with standard‐exposure CsA plus MPA.     

Renal Function at Two Years in Liver Transplant Patients Receiving Everolimus: Results of a Randomized,Multicenter Study

In a 24‐month prospective, randomized, multicenter, open‐label study, de novo liver transplant patients were randomized at 30 days to everolimus (EVR) + Reduced tacrolimus (TAC; n = 245), TAC Control (n = 243) or TAC Elimination (n = 231). Randomization to TAC Elimination was stopped prematurely due to a significantly higher rate of treated biopsy‐proven acute rejection (tBPAR). The incidence of the primary efficacy endpoint, composite efficacy failure rate of tBPAR, graft loss or death postrandomization was similar with EVR + Reduced TAC (10.3%) or TAC Control (12.5%) at month 24 (difference ?2.2%, 97.5% confidence interval [CI] ?8.8%, 4.4%). BPAR was less frequent in the EVR + Reduced TAC group (6.1% vs. 13.3% in TAC Control, p = 0.010). Adjusted change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from randomization to month 24 was superior with EVR + Reduced TAC versus TAC Control: difference 6.7 mL/min/1.73 m² (97.5% CI 1.9, 11.4 mL/min/1.73 m², p = 0.002). Among patients who remained on treatment, mean (SD) eGFR at month 24 was 77.6 (26.5) mL/min/1.73 m² in the EVR + Reduced TAC group and 66.1 (19.3) mL/min/1.73 m² in the TAC Control group (p < 0.001). Study medication was discontinued due to adverse events in 28.6% of EVR + Reduced TAC and 18.2% of TAC Control patients. Early introduction of everolimus with reduced‐exposure tacrolimus at 1 month after liver transplantation provided a significant and clinically relevant benefit for renal function at 2 years posttransplant.

     

Efficacy and safety of bleselumab in kidney transplant recipients: A phase 2, randomized,open‐label,noninferiority study

This study assessed the efficacy and safety of the anti‐CD40 monoclonal antibody bleselumab (ASKP1240) in de novo kidney transplant recipients over 36 months posttransplant. Transplant recipients were randomized (1:1:1) to standard of care (SoC: 0.1 mg/kg per day immediate‐release tacrolimus [IR‐TAC]; target minimum blood concentration [C_trough] 4‐11 ng/mL plus 1 g mycophenolate mofetil [MMF] twice daily) or bleselumab (200 mg on days 0/7/14/28/42/56/70/90, and monthly thereafter) plus either MMF or IR‐TAC (0.1 mg/kg per day; target C_trough 4‐11 ng/mL days 0‐30, then 2‐5 ng/mL). All received basiliximab induction (20 mg pretransplant and on days 3‐5 posttransplant) and corticosteroids. One hundred thirty‐eight transplant recipients received ≥1 dose of study drug (SoC [n = 48]; bleselumab + MMF [n = 46]; bleselumab + IR‐TAC [n = 44]). For the primary endpoint (incidence of biopsy‐proven acute rejection [BPAR] at 6 months), bleselumab + IR‐TAC was noninferior to SoC (difference 2.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI] ?8.1% to 13.8%), and bleselumab + MMF did not demonstrate noninferiority to SoC (difference 30.7%; 95% CI 15.2%‐46.2%). BPAR incidence slightly increased through month 36 in all groups, with bleselumab + IR‐TAC continuing to demonstrate noninferiority to SoC. Bleselumab had a favorable benefit–risk ratio. Most treatment‐emergent adverse events were as expected for kidney transplant recipients (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01780844).     

Effect of tacrolimus and cyclosporine on renal microcirculation and nitric oxide production

OBJECTIVES: Cyclosporine (CSA) and tacrolimus (TAC) frequently induce nephrotoxicity and similar pathologic changes. Acute CSA-induced nephrotoxicity has been reported to be mediated by activation of vasoconstrictors such as endothelin. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the acute effects of TAC and CSA on the renal microcirculation and upon a vasodilator such as nitric oxide (NO) production. METHODS: Renal blood flow (RBF) in the microcirculation was measured by a Laser Doppler flow meter in uninephrectomised rats. RBF, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and renal vascular resistance (RVR) were measured in the following groups: (a) TAC (0.1 to 2.0 mg/kg/h, n = 3 approximately 6); CSA (20 and 50 mg/kg/h, n = 5); (b) L-NAME (10 mg/kg), an NO synthase inhibitor, 8 minutes prior to TAC (0.5 and 1.5 mg/kg/h, n = 5), or CSA (20 and 50 mg/kg/h, n = 5). Stable NO end-products, serum NO(2) and NO(3), were measured by the Griess method (n = 5). RESULTS: None of the parameters were changed by TAC alone, whereas TAC with L-NAME significantly reduced RBF (-28 +/- 7%) and increased RVR (46 +/- 17%) in a dose-dependent manner. CSA alone significantly reduced RBF (-37 +/- 6%) and increased RVR (69 +/- 22%) without any changes in MAP. The effects of CSA were enhanced by L-NAME. Serum concentration of NO(2) + NO(3) was significantly reduced by both L-NAME alone and CSA (50 mg/kg) (P < .05), while there were no changes with TAC (1.5 mg/kg). CONCLUSIONS: Blockade of NO production enhance the vasoconstrictive effect of CSA, and unmasked such an effect of TAC. These results suggest that the nephrotoxicity of CSA and TAC may involve the NO system.     

The ORION Study: Comparison of Two Sirolimus‐Based Regimens versus Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil in Renal Allograft Recipients

Safety and efficacy of two sirolimus (SRL)‐based regimens were compared with tacrolimus (TAC) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Renal transplantation recipients were randomized to Group 1 (SRL+TAC; week 13 TAC elimination [n = 152]), Group 2 (SRL + MMF [n = 152]) or Group 3 (TAC + MMF [n = 139]). Group 2, with higher‐than‐expected biopsy‐confirmed acute rejections (BCARs), was sponsor‐terminated; therefore, Group 2 two‐year data were limited. At 1 and 2 years, respectively, graft (Group 1: 92.8%, 88.5%; Group 2: 90.6%, 89.9%; Group 3: 96.2%, 95.4%) and patient (Group 1: 97.3%, 94.4%; Group 2: 95.2%, 94.5%; Group 3: 97.0%, 97.0%) survival rates were similar. One‐ and 2‐year BCAR incidence was: Group 1, 15.2%, 17.4%; Group 2, 31.3%, 32.8%; Group 3, 8.2%, 12.3% (Group 2 vs. 3, p < 0.001). Mean 1‐ and 2‐year modified intent‐to‐treat glomerular filtration rates (mL/min) were similar. Primary reason for discontinuation was adverse events (Group 1, 34.2%; Group 2, 33.6%; Group 3, 22.3%; p < 0.05). In Groups 1 and 2, delayed wound healing and hyperlipidemia were more frequent. One‐year post hoc analysis of new‐onset diabetes posttransplantation was greater in TAC recipients (Groups 1 and 3 vs. 2, 17% vs. 6%; p = 0.004). Between‐group malignancy rates were similar. The SRL‐based regimens were not associated with improved outcomes for kidney transplantation patients.     

Immunosuppression with Belatacept‐Based,Corticosteroid‐Avoiding Regimens in De Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients

Current immunosuppressive regimens in renal transplantation typically include calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) and corticosteroids, both of which have toxicities that can impair recipient and allograft health. This 1‐year, randomized, controlled, open‐label, exploratory study assessed two belatacept‐based regimens compared to a tacrolimus (TAC)‐based, steroid‐avoiding regimen. Recipients of living and deceased donor renal allografts were randomized 1:1:1 to receive belatacept‐mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), belatacept‐sirolimus (SRL), or TAC‐MMF. All patients received induction with 4 doses of Thymoglobulin (6 mg/kg maximum) and an associated short course of corticosteroids. Eighty‐nine patients were randomized and transplanted. Acute rejection occurred in 4, 1 and 1 patient in the belatacept‐MMF, belatacept‐SRL and TAC‐MMF groups, respectively, by Month 6; most acute rejection occurred in the first 3 months. More than two‐thirds of patients in the belatacept groups remained on CNI‐ and steroid‐free regimens at 12 months and the calculated glomerular filtration rate was 8–10 mL/min higher with either belatacept regimen than with TAC‐MMF. Overall safety was comparable between groups. In conclusion, primary immunosuppression with belatacept may enable the simultaneous avoidance of both CNIs and corticosteroids in recipients of living and deceased standard criteria donor kidneys, with acceptable rates of acute rejection and improved renal function relative to a TAC‐based regimen.     

Controlled randomized study comparing the cardiovascular profile of everolimus with tacrolimus in renal transplantation

Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) regression after kidney transplantation may be influenced by immunosuppression. In a 24‐month open‐label, multicenter, phase‐IV study, 71 kidney allograft recipients without previous acute rejection, showing eGFR >40 ml/min and proteinuria <500 mg/day and between 6 months and 3 years post‐transplantation, were randomized to receive everolimus (EVR) + mycophenolic acid (MPA) or were maintained on tacrolimus (TAC) + MPA. The aim was to assess whether the conversion to EVR could reduce left ventricular mass index (LVMi) at month‐24. LVMi at month‐24 decreased without differences between groups (TAC: 54.0 vs. 48.2 g/m^2.7; EVR: 53.4 vs. 49.4 g/m^2.7). The LVH prevalence at baseline and month‐24 was 59.4% and 40.6% in TAC group and 57.1% and 50.0% in EVR group. EVR conversion was associated with nearly disappearance of concentric LVH and concentric remodeling pattern. The procollagen type I N‐terminal propeptide at month‐24 showed greater reduction in EVR group (51.6 vs. 58.2 mg/l; P = 0.004). Conversion from TAC to EVR was associated with a significant improvement of eGFR (P = 0.0315, ancova ). Adverse events were similar between groups without rejection episode or graft loss. Conversion from TAC to EVR did not further reduce LVMi after 24 months, although its effect on concentric LVH deserves further investigation (NCT01169701).     

Liposomal encapsulation significantly enchances the immunosuppressive effect of tacrolimus in a discordant islet xenotransplant model

BACKGROUND: Encapsulation of tacrolimus (TAC) in a lipid bilayer to form liposome-encapsulated tacrolimus (LTAC) alters the biodistribution profile, half-life, and efficacy in organ allotransplantation models. LTAC has not been applied to either cell transplantation or xenotransplantation. METHODS: To test the efficacy of LTAC in a discordant islet xenograft model, tilapia (fish) islets were transplanted under the left kidney capsules of streptozotocin-diabetic Balb/c mice. Recipient mice (groups I-VI) were treated with: I, untreated; II, empty liposomes; III, TAC (2 mg/kg/day); IV, TAC (5 mg/kg/day); V, LTAC (2 mg/kg/day); or VI, LTAC (5 mg/kg/day); all treatments were for 35 days or until rejection (i.e., two glucose measurements >200 mg/dl). Graft-bearing kidneys were removed for histology after rejection. RESULTS: Mean graft survival time (mGST) for control groups I and II were 6.7+/-1.4 (n=6) and 7.5+/-1.3 days (n=4), respectively. Daily TAC treatment at 2 mg/kg/d (III) did not prolong graft function (mGST=7.7+/-1.6; n=6) although 5 mg/kg/day (IV) produced minimal prolongation to 12.8+/-4.8 days (n=12). Treatment with LTAC at 2 mg/kg/day (V) significantly prolonged mGST to 26.6+/-4.9 (n=5); however, all recipients rejected during treatment (i.e.,<35 days). LTAC at 5 mg/kg/day (VI) further prolonged mGST to 39.9+/-11.8 days (n=12) with only one mouse rejecting before day 35. Histologically, at the time of functional rejection, grafts were generally either totally or partially effaced by mononuclear cells, eosinophils, and fibrosis. In groups VI, islet grafts removed from two mice that died while they were normoglycemic and from a mouse terminated while it was normoglycemic at day 36 were viable, well-granulated, and free from cellular infiltration. The group VI grafts examined at rejection (i.e., 1-2 weeks after discontinuing LTAC) were generally totally obliterated and were in two instances associated with nodular aggregates of atypical lymphocytes resembling posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder. CONCLUSIONS: LTAC is the most potent immunosuppressive compound we have tested in our discordant fish-to-mouse islet xenograft model; however, toxicity is an issue at high doses.     

Efficacy and safety of everolimus with reduced tacrolimus in living‐donor liver transplant recipients: 12‐month results of a randomized multicenter study

In a multicenter, open‐label, study, 284 living‐donor liver transplant patients were randomized at 30 ± 5 days posttransplant to start everolimus+reduced tacrolimus (EVR+rTAC) or continue standard tacrolimus (TAC Control). EVR+rTAC was non‐inferior to TAC Control for the primary efficacy endpoint of treated BPAR, graft loss or death at 12 months posttransplant: difference –0.7% (90% CI ?5.2%, 3.7%); P < .001 for non‐inferiority. Treated BPAR occurred in 2.2% and 3.6% of patients, respectively. The key secondary endpoint, change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from randomization to month 12, achieved non‐inferiority (P < .001 for non‐inferiority), but not superiority and was similar between groups overall (mean ?8.0 vs. ?12.1 mL/min/1.73 m², P = .108), and in patients continuing randomized treatment (?8.0 vs. ?13.3 mL/min/1.73 m², P = .046). In the EVR+rTAC and TAC control groups, study drug was discontinued in 15.5% and 17.6% of patients, adverse events with suspected relation to study drug occurred in 57.0% and 40.4%, and proteinuria ≥1 g/24 h in 9.3% and 0%, respectively. Everolimus did not negatively affect liver regeneration. At 12 months, hepatocellular recurrence was only seen in the standard TAC‐treated patients (5/62; 8.1%). In conclusion, early introduction of EVR+rTAC was non‐inferior to standard tacrolimus in terms of efficacy and renal function at 12 months, with hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence only in TAC Control patients. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01888432.     

他克莫司缓释胶囊对肝移植术后稳定期受者安全性和临床疗效评估

目的通过他克莫司缓释胶囊（MR4）的Ⅲ期临床试验（MR4LTxCN02）评价MR4在肝移植术后稳定期受者中的安全性和临床疗效。方法受试者随机分配入MR4或他克莫司（FK506）组,MR4组药物剂量按1：1进行药物转换,每日口服1次;FK506组维持每12h服药1次至试验结束。在为期3个月的临床试验阶段,随访了受试者生命体征、不良事件、血常规、尿常规、肝功能、血糖、血脂及FK506的谷值浓度。随访结果采用SAS8．0统计软件进行了Fisher精确卡方检验及t检验分析。结果MR4组按1：1药物转换后与FK506组具有同等的安全性和临床疗效。与FK506组比较,MR4组具有感冒、上呼吸道感染症状减少倾向,没有增加不良事件或不良反应的发生率。转换药物后的剂量和血药浓度与换药前未发生显著变化;药代动力学检测结果表明,MR4具备缓释剂型的药代动力学特征,并与FK506具有良好的生物等效性。结论MR4与FK506具有同等的安全性和临床疗效,同时简化了服药次数,在提高受者长期依从性以及术后生活质量方面具有较大的优势。     

五酯胶囊对CYP3A5基因表达型特发性膜性肾病他克莫司药代动力学影响的初步探索

目的 分析五酯胶囊(wuzhi capsules,WZC)对CYP3A5基因表达型特发性膜性肾病(idiopathic membranous nephropathy,IMN)患者他克莫司(tacrolimus,TAC)药代动力学指标的影响程度,初步探索此类患者联用WZC后TAC的用药剂量.方法 2013年7月至2015年3月本院肾内科住院经肾穿刺病理活检诊断为IMN,荧光染色原位杂交技术(fluorescence in situ hybridization,FISH)检测CYP3A5基因分型均为CYP3A5基因表达型(即AA、AG)的患者68例,随机数字表分为治疗组(WZC+ TAC)与对照组(TAC),比较两组患者治疗开始8周、16周、24周时TAC用药剂量D[mg·(kg·d)-1]、全血谷浓度C0 (ng/mL)、全血谷浓度与用药剂量的比值C0/D[(ng/mL)/(mg· (kg·d)-1)],并记录治疗24周两组患者有效率、不良反应发生率.结果 治疗开始8周、16周、24周的各访视点上,两组患者的C0差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05);组间比较:治疗组的D较对照组显著降低(P ＜0.001),C0/D较对照组显著升高(P＜0.001);两组患者组内比较时不同访视点D、C0/D的差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05),治疗组TAC的平均用药剂量为(0.037±0.002)mg·(kg·d)-1,约为对照组平均用药剂量的60％.治疗24周,两组患者的治疗有效率以及不良反应发生率的差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05),但治疗组的有效率较对照组有所升高.结论 WZC可平稳、安全的显著提高CYP3A5基因表达型IMN患者TAC全血谷浓度,进而减少用药剂量、减轻患者的经济负担,为其临床推广创造条件.     

Safety assessment of the conversion from mycophenolate mofetil to enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in stable renal transplant recipients

The immunosuppressant mycophenolate mofetil (MMF; CellCept) has greatly improved transplant recipients' clinical outcomes, but its efficacy may be limited by dose adjustments due to adverse events (AEs). An enteric-coated formulation of mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS; myfortic), designed to improve gastrointestinal tolerability is now available. This Latin-American, prospective, multicenter, open-label, 6-month trial assessed the safety and tolerability of converting renal transplant recipients from MMF to EC-MPS. In total, 237 renal transplant recipients (stable > or = 3 months' posttransplant) receiving MMF (< or =1000 mg b.i.d.) were enrolled. Adults (n = 218) were converted to EC-MPS 720 mg b.i.d. (equimolar to MMF 1000 mg b.i.d.) even if they were initially receiving <1000 mg MMF b.i.d. (ie, 47 adults received a higher than equimolar dose of EC-MPS). Children (n = 19) were converted to EC-MPS 450 or 432 mg/m2 b.i.d. Patients also received cyclosporine microemulsion (Neoral) and corticosteroids. There were three acute rejections and no graft failures. The incidence of AEs was 59.9% (in those receiving a higher than equimolar EC-MPS dose it was 57.4%). In all, 22% of patients had gastrointestinal AEs, 37% had infections, and 4.8% had hematological AEs. Only 24 patients (10%) had an AE-related dose reduction. Seven of these patients had received higher than equimolar doses of EC-MPS. Patients can be safely converted from different doses of MMF to a standard dose of EC-MPS. The requirement for EC-MPS dose reduction to manage AEs was relatively low. Use of EC-MPS is a valid alternative for renal transplant recipients receiving maintenance MMF treatment.     

Sotrastaurin,a Novel Small Molecule Inhibiting Protein‐Kinase C: Randomized Phase II Study in Renal Transplant Recipients

Sotrastaurin, a selective protein‐kinase‐C inhibitor, blocks early T‐cell activation through a calcineurin‐independent mechanism. In this study, de novo renal transplant recipients with immediate graft function were randomized 1:2 to tacrolimus (control, n = 44) or sotrastaurin (300 mg b.i.d.; n = 81). All patients received basiliximab, mycophenolic acid (MPA) and steroids. The primary endpoint was the composite of treated biopsy‐proven acute rejection (BPAR), graft loss, death or lost to follow‐up at month 3. The main safety assessment was estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR); modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) at month 3. Composite efficacy failure at month 3 was higher for the sotrastaurin versus control regimen (25.7% vs. 4.5%, p = 0.001), driven by higher BPAR rates (23.6% vs. 4.5%, p = 0.003), which led to early study termination. Median (± standard deviation [SD]) eGFR was higher for sotrastaurin versus control at all timepoints from day 7 (month 3: 59.0 ± 22.3 vs. 49.5 ± 17.7 mL/min/1.73 m², p = 0.006). The most common adverse events were gastrointestinal disorders (control: 63.6%; sotrastaurin: 88.9%) which led to study‐medication discontinuation in two sotrastaurin patients. This study demonstrated a lower degree of efficacy but better renal function with the calcineurin‐inhibitor‐free regimen of sotrastaurin+MPA versus the tacrolimus‐based control. Ongoing studies are evaluating alternative sotrastaurin regimens .     

Sotrastaurin in Calcineurin Inhibitor–Free Regimen Using Everolimus in De Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients

Sotrastaurin, a novel selective protein‐kinase‐C inhibitor, inhibits early T cell activation via a calcineurin‐independent pathway. Efficacy and safety of sotrastaurin in a calcineurin inhibitor—free regimen were evaluated in this two‐stage Phase II study of de novo kidney transplant recipients. Stage 1 randomized 131 patients (2:1) to sotrastaurin 300 mg or cyclosporine A (CsA). Stage 2 randomized 180 patients (1:1:1) to sotrastaurin 300 or 200 mg or CsA. All patients received basiliximab, everolimus (EVR) and prednisone. Primary endpoint was composite efficacy failure rate of treated biopsy‐proven acute rejection, graft loss, death or lost to follow‐up. Main safety assessment was estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) by MDRD‐4 at Month 12. Composite efficacy failure rates at 12 months were higher in sotrastaurin arms (Stage 1: 16.5% and 10.9% for sotrastaurin 300 mg and CsA; Stage 2: 27.2%, 34.5% and 19.4% for sotrastaurin 200 mg, 300 mg and CsA). eGFR was significantly better in sotrastaurin groups versus CsA at most time points, except at 12 months. Gastrointestinal and cardiac adverse events were more frequent with sotrastaurin. Higher treatment discontinuation, deaths and graft losses occurred with sotrastaurin 300 mg. Sotrastaurin combined with EVR showed higher efficacy failure rates and some improvement in renal allograft function compared to a CsA‐based therapy.     

Mycophenolic acid trough levels after kidney transplantation in a cyclosporine‐free protocol

Abstract Twenty‐seven stable kidney transplant recipients treated with cyclosporine and prednisone were converted to mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and prednisone 1 year after transplantation. After conversion the patients were treated with a standard daily dose of 1 g MMF b.i.d. and 10 mg prednisone for 4 months. Thereafter, two MMF dose reductions were performed with a 4‐month interval. Mycophenolic acid (MPA) trough levels were measured at regular intervals. A relation was found between MPA trough levels and MMF dose. The median MPA trough level for patients treated with 1 g MMF b. i. d. was 4.3 μg/ml (0.95‐15.5) and 3.0 μg/ml (0.73‐7.8) for patients treated with 750 mg b. i. d. (P = 0.0002). The MPA trough levels further decreased from 3.0 to 2.3 μg/ml (0.6‐6.63) in patients treated with 500 mg MMF b. i. d. (P = 0.01). Dose reduction of MMF from 1 g to 750 mg b.i.d. could be performed without acute rejections. A further dose reduction to 500 mg b.i.d. elicited 3 rejections. Patients experiencing an acute rejection had a median MPA trough level of 2.3 μg/ml (1.26‐3.38) compared to 3.8 μg/ml (1.48‐6.52) in patients without an acute rejection (P = 0.25). We conclude that there is a significant relation between MPA trough levels and MMF dose. MPA trough levels were not predictive of rejection in the present study.     

Single-shot antithymocyte globuline and daclizumab induction in simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplant recipient: three-year results

Since 1996, preoperative single-shot dose antithymocyte globuline (ATG) with prednisolone (PRD), mycophenolate mofetile (MMF), and tacrolimus (TAC) is the favorite induction therapy in our center. In a series of 25 first simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplant (SPK) recipients, 5 doses of daclizumab were administered in addition to standard induction. Here we present our 3-year experience. Immunosuppression was started prior to reperfusion consisting of daclizumab (1 mg/kg body weight [bw]), ATG (4-6 mg/kg bw) and 250 mg PRD. After surgery, PRD was reduced gradually, TAC trough levels were between 8-15 ng/mL, MMF was given twice daily (2-3 g/d) as well as 4 further doses dacilzumab every 14 days. After 3 years, patient, pancreas, and kidney graft survival rates are 100%, 84%, and 92%, respectively. Four pancreas grafts were lost (chronic allograft dysfunction, n = 2; recurrent abdominal infection, n = 1; acute rejection [AR] without treatment, n = 1). Both patients suffering from severe infection and untreated AR lost their kidney graft too. During the first 3 months after SPK, 3 AR episodes were observed in 2 patients (8%). After a 3-year period, 8 AR episodes occurred in 7 recipients (28%). AR was treated using PRD (n = 5) or ATG (n = 1). In 1 case, immunosuppression was switched from TAC to sirolimus successfully. Overall, 8 AR episodes occurred in 7 patients (28%) during the first 3 years after SPK. One severe infection led to graft lost 13 months after SPK. In this series, the combination of ATG and daclizumab prevented AR episodes, successfully providing considerable 3-year survival rates.