Differential outcomes in 3 types of acute antibody‐mediated rejection

Abstract: Introduction: The aim of this study is to investigate the prevalence, predictors, and clinical outcomes of acute antibody‐mediated rejection (AAMR). Methods: Retrospective analysis of 833 adult patients who received kidney transplantation between 1/1/2001 and 8/15/2007. Results: The prevalence of AAMR and acute cellular rejection was 2% and 8.2%, respectively. Eight patients had type I, seven type II, and two type III AAMR. All patients had at least one strong donor‐specific anti‐HLA antibodies (DSA) with a median fluorescence intensity (MFI) value of over 6000 and the mean number of strong DSAs was 2.0 ± 0.7. Fifteen of 17 patients received pre‐transplant desensitization treatment. During a median 28 months of follow‐up (range: 12–38 months), two patients died (88% patient survival), and nine lost their allografts (35% graft survival). While all type I AAMR patients responded to treatment, all type III patients, and four of seven patients with type II AAMR lost their allografts earlier, and three type II AAMR patients later due to transplant glomerulopathy. Conclusions: AAMR is mainly seen in patients with pre‐transplant strong DSAs. There is a striking difference in clinical outcomes of AAMR that types II and III AAMR patients have poor prognosis compared to type I AAMR patients.     

Bortezomib as the Sole Post‐Renal Transplantation Desensitization Agent Does Not Decrease Donor‐Specific Anti‐HLA Antibodies

Persistence of donor‐specific anti‐HLA antibodies (DSA) associated with antibody‐mediated graft injuries following kidney transplantation predicts evolution toward chronic humoral rejection and reduced graft survival. Targeting plasma cells, the main antibody‐producing cells, with the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib may be a promising desensitization strategy. We evaluated the in vivo efficacy of one cycle of bortezomib (1.3 mg/m²× 4 doses), used as the sole desensitization therapy, in four renal transplant recipients experiencing subacute antibody‐mediated rejection with persisting DSA (>2000 [Mean Fluorescence Intensity] MFI). Bortezomib treatment did not significantly decrease DSA MFI within the 150‐day posttreatment period in any patient. In addition, antivirus (HBV, VZV and HSV) antibody levels remained stable following treatment suggesting a lack of efficacy on long‐lived plasma cells. In conclusion, one cycle of bortezomib alone does not decrease DSA levels in sensitized kidney transplant recipients in the time period studied. These results underscore the need to evaluate this new desensitization agent properly in prospective, randomized and well‐controlled studies.     

Safety and efficacy of eculizumab in the prevention of antibody‐mediated rejection in living‐donor kidney transplant recipients requiring desensitization therapy: A randomized trial

We report results of a phase 2, randomized, multicenter, open‐label, two‐arm study evaluating the safety and efficacy of eculizumab in preventing acute antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR) in sensitized recipients of living‐donor kidney transplants requiring pretransplant desensitization (NCT01399593). In total, 102 patients underwent desensitization. Posttransplant, 51 patients received standard of care (SOC) and 51 received eculizumab. The primary end point was week 9 posttransplant treatment failure rate, a composite of: biopsy‐proven acute AMR (Banff 2007 grade II or III; assessed by blinded central pathology); graft loss; death; or loss to follow‐up. Eculizumab was well tolerated with no new safety concerns. No significant difference in treatment failure rate was observed between eculizumab (9.8%) and SOC (13.7%; P = .760). To determine whether data assessment assumptions affected study outcome, biopsies were reanalyzed by central pathologists using clinical information. The resulting treatment failure rates were 11.8% and 21.6% for the eculizumab and SOC groups, respectively (nominal P = .288). When reassessment included grade I AMR, the treatment failure rates were 11.8% (eculizumab) and 29.4% (SOC; nominal P = .048). This finding suggests a potential benefit for eculizumab compared with SOC in preventing acute AMR in recipients sensitized to their living‐donor kidney transplants (EudraCT 2010‐019630‐28).     

The use of eculizumab in renal transplantation

The complement system plays a vital role in mediating disease processes within renal allografts. Eculizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that targets complement protein C5, inhibiting cleavage into C5a and C5b, and therefore preventing formation of the membrane attack complex (MAC). It has been used primarily within renal transplantation to treat atypical hemolytic‐uremic syndrome (aHUS) and antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR) post‐transplant, and also as prophylaxis in transplants at high risk for these conditions. Eculizumab appears to be effective in protecting renal allografts when post‐transplant aHUS or AMR occur, although the published cases report relatively short follow‐up. It is unclear how long treatment should continue (a particularly important issue given the expense of the drug), or whether eculizumab contributes to the development of accommodation in humans. When used for prophylaxis, eculizumab also appears to be effective. Some highly sensitized patients have developed either acute AMR or features of chronic AMR despite administration of the drug – this suggests that complement activation is not the only mechanism responsible for AMR. All patients should receive vaccination against Neisseria meningitidis prior to receiving eculizumab. Clinical trials, predominantly in antibody‐incompatible renal transplantation, are ongoing to determine the optimal use of C5 inhibition.     

Safety and efficacy of eculizumab for the prevention of antibody‐mediated rejection after deceased‐donor kidney transplantation in patients with preformed donor‐specific antibodies

The presence of preformed donor‐specific antibodies in transplant recipients increases the risk of acute antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR). Results of an open‐label single‐arm trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of eculizumab in preventing acute AMR in recipients of deceased‐donor kidney transplants with preformed donor‐specific antibodies are reported. Participants received eculizumab as follows: 1200 mg immediately before reperfusion; 900 mg on posttransplant days 1, 7, 14, 21, and 28; and 1200 mg at weeks 5, 7, and 9. All patients received thymoglobulin induction therapy and standard maintenance immunosuppression including steroids. The primary end point was treatment failure rate, a composite of biopsy‐proved grade II/III AMR (Banff 2007 criteria), graft loss, death, or loss to follow‐up, within 9 weeks posttransplant. Eighty patients received transplants (48 women); the median age was 52 years (range 24‐70 years). Observed treatment failure rate (8.8%) was significantly lower than expected for standard care (40%; P < .001). By 9 weeks, 3 of 80 patients had experienced AMR, and 4 of 80 had experienced graft loss. At 36 months, graft and patient survival rates were 83.4% and 91.5%, respectively. Eculizumab was well tolerated and no new safety concerns were identified. Eculizumab has the potential to provide prophylaxis against injury caused by acute AMR in such patients (EudraCT 2010‐019631‐35).     

Terminal complement inhibition decreases antibody-mediated rejection in sensitized renal transplant recipients

Sensitized renal transplant recipients with high levels of donor-specific alloantibody (DSA) commonly develop antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), which may cause acute graft loss or shorten allograft survival. We examined the efficacy of terminal complement inhibition with the humanized anti-C5 antibody, eculizumab, in the prevention AMR in renal transplant recipients with a positive crossmatch against their living donor. The incidence of biopsy-proven AMR in the first 3 months posttransplant in 26 highly sensitized recipients of living donor renal transplants who received eculizumab posttransplant was compared to a historical control group of 51 sensitized patients treated with a similar plasma exchange (PE)-based protocol without eculizumab. The incidence of AMR was 7.7% (2/26) in the eculizumab group compared to 41.2% (21/51) in the control group (p = 0.0031). Eculizumab also decreased AMR in patients who developed high levels of DSA early after transplantation that caused proximal complement activation. With eculizumab, AMR episodes were easily treated with PE reducing the need for splenectomy. On 1-year protocol biopsy, transplant glomerulopathy was found to be present in 6.7% (1/15) eculizumab-treated recipients and in 35.7% (15/42) of control patients (p = 0.044). Inhibition of terminal complement activation with eculizumab decreases the incidence of early AMR in sensitized renal transplant recipients (ClincalTrials.gov number NCT006707).     

Splenic Irradiation for the Treatment of Severe Antibody‐Mediated Rejection

Patients requiring desensitization prior to renal transplantation are at risk for developing severe antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR) refractory to treatment with plasmapheresis and intravenous immunoglobulin (PP/IVIg). We have previously reported success at graft salvage, long‐term graft survival and protection against transplant glomerulopathy with the use of eculizumab and splenectomy in addition to PP/IVIg. Splenectomy may be an important component of this combination therapy and is itself associated with a marked reduction in donor‐specific antibody (DSA) production. However, splenectomy represents a major operation, and some patients with severe AMR have comorbid conditions that substantially increase their risk of complications during and after surgery. In an effort to spare recipients the morbidity of a second operation, we used splenic irradiation in lieu of splenectomy in two incompatible live donor kidney transplant recipients with severe AMR in addition to PP/IVIg, rituximab and eculizumab. This novel approach to the treatment of severe AMR was associated with allograft salvage, excellent graft function and no short‐ or medium‐term adverse effects of the radiation therapy. One‐year surveillance biopsies did not show transplant glomerulopathy (tg) on light microscopy, but microcirculation inflammation and tg were present on electron microscopy.     

Eculizumab in renal transplantation

Antibody-mediated rejection, be it acute, subacute or chronic, is currently recognized as the major cause of graft loss in kidney transplant recipients. Anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies are deleterious to the graft fate whether they pre-exist to the transplantation or appear in the course of transplantation. The role of complement is therefore prominent in most instances. As well, the role of complement activation is crucial in the recurrence of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome post-transplantation (aHUS) as well as following ischemia-reperfusion injury leading to delayed graft function.Eculizumab, a fully humanized monoclonal antibody directed against the C5 component of the complement cascade is efficient in chronically and safely blocking complement activation for example in paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria.In the setting of kidney transplantation, there is convincing but still limited evidence that eculizumab is efficient in preventing both acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejection in highly sensitized recipients requiring desensitization before getting a living donor kidney transplant. Studies are currently ongoing to determine its efficacy and safety in ABO incompatible transplantation, in the prevention of acute and chronic rejection either with a living or a deceased donor kidney as well as in the prevention of delayed graft function.Similar to its efficacy in aHUS on native kidneys, eculizumab prevents or treats recurrence after kidney transplantation.There is still a lot of research to be performed in order to determine precisely the exact indications and the length of treatment with this very active but also very expensive drug that will undoubtedly revolutionize the current management of patients with donor specific antibodies (DSAs) and at risk of HUS recurrence.     

Antibody Mediated Rejection Associated With Complement Factor H–Related Protein 3/1 Deficiency Successfully Treated With Eculizumab

Antibody mediated rejection (AMR) activates the classical complement pathway and can be detrimental to graft survival. AMR can be accompanied by thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA). Eculizumab, a monoclonal C5 antibody prevents induction of the terminal complement cascade (TCC) and has recently emerged as a therapeutic option for AMR. We present a highly sensitized 13‐year‐old female with end‐stage kidney disease secondary to spina bifida‐associated reflux nephropathy, who developed severe steroid‐, ATG‐ and plasmapheresis‐resistant AMR with TMA 1 week post second kidney transplant despite previous desensitization therapy with immunoglobulin infusions. Eculizumab rescue therapy resulted in a dramatic improvement in biochemical (C3; creatinine) and hematological (platelets) parameters within 6 days. The patient was proven to be deficient in complement Factor H‐related protein 3/1 (CFHR3/1), a plasma protein that regulates the complement cascade at the level of C5 conversion and has been involved in the pathogenesis of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome caused by CFH autoantibodies (DEAP‐HUS). CFHR1 deficiency may have worsened the severe clinical progression of AMR and possibly contributed to the development of donor‐specific antibodies. Thus, screening for CFHR3/1 deficiency should be considered in patients with severe AMR associated with TMA.     

Upfront use of eculizumab to treat early acute antibody-mediated rejection after kidney allotransplantation and relevance for xenotransplantation

Acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) early after transplant remains a challenge, both in allotransplantation and in xenotransplantation. We report the case of an early and severe acute AMR episode in a kidney transplant recipient that was successfully treated with upfront eculizumab. A 58-year-old woman had been on dialysis since 2014. She underwent a first kidney transplant in 2018 with primary non-function and received several blood transfusions. Postoperatively, she developed anti-HLA antibodies. One year later, she received a second allograft from a deceased donor. At day 0, there was only one preformed low-level donor-specific antibody (DSA) anti-DQ7. After initial excellent allograft function, serum creatinine increased on days 7-9, and this was associated with oligo-anuria. On day 7, there was an increase in her DSA anti-DQ7 and 4 de novo DSA had developed at high MFI values. Allograft biopsy showed severe active AMR with diffuse C4d deposits in peritubular capillaries. The early acute AMR episode was treated with upfront eculizumab administration (2 doses) with efficient CH50 blockade (< 10% CH50). Rituximab was also administered on day 12, and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) was given over the following days. There was an excellent clinical response to eculizumab administration. Eculizumab administration rapidly reversed the acute AMR episode without the need for plasmapheresis. Rituximab and IVIG were also used as B-cell immunomodulators to decrease DSA. Blocking efficiently the terminal complement pathway may become a useful strategy to treat acute AMR in sensitized recipients of allografts, and possibly in recipients of discordant xenografts.     

Eculizumab for Prevention of Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Blood Group-Incompatible Renal Transplantation

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is one of the leading causes of allograft failure especially in patients undergoing ABO-incompatible (ABOi) renal transplantation. We hypothesized that complement inhibition with eculizumab, a C5 inhibitor, would protect against AMR and maintain graft function in ABOi renal transplant recipients. Four patients undergoing living donor kidney transplant from ABOi donors were treated with a 9-week eculizumab course without therapeutic plasma exchange, intravenous immunoglobulin, or splenectomy. All patients had successful transplants and have normal graft function at the time of last follow-up. There were no cases of AMR or acute cellular rejection. Of note, 2 patients were transplanted despite persistent ABO antibody titers of 1:32, conventionally considered a contraindication to proceed in standard protocols. Eculizumab is a promising option to prevent AMR with ABOi renal transplantation without the need for splenectomy, post-transplant therapeutic plasma exchange, and intravenous immunoglobulin. Future multicenter studies are needed to determine long-term efficacy and safety.     

Effect of high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin on anti-HLA antibodies in sensitized kidney transplant candidates

Limited data exist on the effect of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) on anti-HLA antibodies as determined by solid-phase assays. We reviewed our experience treating sensitized wait-listed kidney transplant recipients with IVIg as a method for desensitization and report our results utilizing Luminex single antigen (LSA) bead assay to quantify antibody reactivity (MFI). Fifteen patients with a cPRA > 40% received 2 g/kg IVIg per month for four months or until transplanted. LSA testing was performed before and after IVIg. Median MFI for anti-class I antibodies fell in 11 (73%) and increased in 4 (27%) patients after IVIg. Similar significant changes in MFI for anti-class II antibodies were observed in 10 patients (66%). Administration of IVIg was associated with a modest decrease in reactivity to both class I and II HLA antigens (median MFI change 493 and 1110, respectively; p < 0.0001) but did not significantly alter mean cPRA (85% before IVIg vs. 80% after IVIg; p = 0.1). Our data suggest a smaller effect of IVIg on HLA antibody reactivity than previously described, leading us to question how best to measure the efficacy of a desensitization protocol in current practice.     

Long‐term survival in visceral transplant recipients in the new era: A single‐center experience

There is a paucity of data on long‐term outcomes following visceral transplantation in the contemporary era. This is a single‐center retrospective analysis of all visceral allograft recipients who underwent transplant between November 2003 and December 2013 with at least 3‐year follow‐up data. Clinical data from a prospectively maintained database were used to assess outcomes including patient and graft survival. Of 174 recipients, 90 were adults and 84 were pediatric patients. Types of visceral transplants were isolated intestinal transplant (56.3%), combined liver‐intestinal transplant (25.3%), multivisceral transplant (16.1%), and modified multivisceral transplant (2.3%). Three‐, 5‐, and 10‐year overall patient survival was 69.5%, 66%, and 63%, respectively, while 3‐, 5‐, and 10‐year overall graft survival was 67%, 62%, and 61%, respectively. In multivariable analysis, significant predictors of survival included pediatric recipient (P = .001), donor/recipient weight ratio <0.9 (P = .008), no episodes of severe acute rejection (P = .021), cold ischemia time <8 hours (P = .014), and shorter hospital stay (P = .0001). In conclusion, visceral transplantation remains a good option for treatment of end‐stage intestinal failure with parenteral nutritional complications. Proper graft selection, shorter cold ischemia time, and improvement of immunosuppression regimens could significantly improve the long‐term survival.     

Kidney paired exchange and desensitization: Strategies to transplant the difficult to match kidney patients with living donors

With organs in short supply, only a limited number of kidney transplants can be performed a year. Live donor donation accounts for 1/3rd of all kidney transplants performed in the United States. Unfortunately, not every donor recipient pair is feasible because of Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) sensitization and ABO incompatibility. To overcome these barriers to transplant, strategies such as kidney paired donation (KPD) and desensitization have been developed. KPD is the exchange of donors between at least two incompatible donor-recipient pairs such that they are now compatible. Desensitization is the removal of circulating donor specific antibodies to prevent graft rejection. Regardless of the treatment strategy, highly sensitized patients whose calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA) is ≥95% remain difficult to transplant with match rates as low as 15% in KPD pools. Desensitization has proved to be difficult in those with high antibody titers. A novel approach is the combination of both KPD and desensitization to facilitate compatible and successful transplantation. A highly sensitized patient can be paired with a better immunological match in the KPD pool and subsequently desensitized to a lesser degree. This article reviews the current progress in KPD and desensitization and their use as a combined therapy.     

The 6‐year clinical outcomes for patients registered in a multiregional United States Kidney Paired Donation program ‐ a retrospective study

We examined what happened during a 6‐year period to 1121 end‐stage renal disease patients who registered with their willing/incompatible living donors for kidney exchanges with the Alliance for Paired Donation (APD). Of all patients, 65% were transplanted: 37% in kidney paired donation (APD‐KPD, APD‐other‐KPD); 10% with compatible live donors (APD‐LD); and 18% with deceased donors (APD‐DD). The remaining patients were withdrawn (sick/died/others; 15%), or were still waiting (20%). For those patients with a cPRA 0–94%, 72% received a transplant. In contrast, only 49% of very highly sensitized (VHS; cPRA 95–100%) were transplanted. Of the VHS patients, 50% were transplanted by KPD/APD‐LD while 50% benefited through prioritization of deceased donors in the modified kidney allocation system (KAS introduced in 2014). All APD transplanted groups had similar death‐censored 4‐year graft survivals as their relevant Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) groups. It is noteworthy that VHS graft and patient survival results were comparable to less sensitized and nonsensitized patients. All patients should be encouraged to search for compatible donors through different options. Expanding the donor pool through KPD and the new KAS of the OPTN increases the likelihood of transplantation for VHS patients.     

Six‐year outcomes in broadly HLA‐sensitized living donor transplant recipients desensitized with intravenous immunoglobulin and rituximab

Desensitization with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and rituximab can improve transplantation rates in broadly sensitized kidney transplant recipients. However, long‐term outcomes are lacking. Here we analyze long‐term outcomes in living donor kidney transplant recipients desensitized with this regimen and compare them to low‐risk recipients. Living donor kidney transplants that took place between July 2006 and December 2010 were considered retrospectively. The primary end point of the study was death‐censored allograft survival at last follow‐up. Secondary end points included patient survival, incidence of rejection, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and proteinuria. There were 66 sensitized and 111 low‐risk patients included. Average follow‐up was 68 months. There was no difference in long‐term patient or graft survival. The rate of rejection was similar in the groups with more early rejection in the sensitized group and more late rejection in the low‐risk group. There was more antibody‐mediated rejection in the sensitized group. Estimated GFR was similar during the follow‐up period. Risk factors for rejection included a positive cross‐match (HR: 2.4 CI: 1.35–4.40) and age (HR: 0.97 CI: 0.95–0.99). Desensitization with IVIG and rituximab has good long‐term results with graft outcomes similar to non‐HLA‐sensitized patients despite higher immunologic risk.     

Mastering the Risk of HLA Antibodies in Kidney Transplantation: An Algorithm Based on Pretransplant Single‐Antigen Flow Bead Techniques

The utilization of sensitive techniques of detection of HLA antibodies to define and measure sensitization has greatly evolved in recent years. We present here an approach to minimize the risk of HLA antibodies in kidney transplantation based on the evaluation of graft accessibility of sensitized patients by calculated PRA (cPRA) and estimation of potential matched donors (PMD) using a national simulation software program. This study included all registered patients on our waiting list (WL) for deceased donor (DD) kidney transplants. All patients were screened by single‐antigen flow bead (SAFB) techniques. Of the 502 registered patients, 174 (34.7%) were sensitized. Among these, 48.3% (84 pts) had a cPRA>85%. For 75.3% of sensitized patients (90 pts with cPRA≤85% and 41 pts with cPRA>85%), the flow of PMD was considered sufficient to allow a transplant avoiding all unacceptable antigens. The 41 patients with a cPRA>85% (48.8%) had a satisfactory donor flow in the framework of the national prioritization program for highly sensitized patients. Finally, 43 sensitized patients (24.7%) were deemed eligible for a strategy of higher immunological risk through desensitization protocols or transplantation against HLA‐DSAs. This approach provides a logical and systematic strategy to rationalize the access of sensitized patients to kidney transplantation minimizing the risk of HLA antibodies.     

100 multivisceral transplants at a single center

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to summarize the evolution of multivisceral transplantation over a decade of experience and evaluate its current status. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Multivisceral transplantation can be valuable for the treatment of patients with massive abdominal catastrophes. Its major limitations have been technical and rejection of the intestinal graft. METHODS: This study consisted of an outcome analysis of 98 consecutive patients who received multivisceral transplantation at our institution. This represents the largest single center experience to date. RESULTS: The most common diseases in our population before transplant were intestinal gastroschisis and intestinal dysmotility syndromes in children, and mesenteric thrombosis and trauma in adults. Kaplan Meier estimated patient and graft survivals for all cases were 65% and 63% at 1 year, 49% and 47% at 3 years, and 49% and 47% at 5 years. Factors that adversely influenced patient survival included transplant before 1998 (P = 0.01), being hospitalized at the time of transplant (P = 0.05), and being a child who received Campath-1H induction (P = 0.03). Among 37 patients who had none of these 3 factors (15 adults and 22 children), estimated 1- and 3-year survivals were 89% and 71%, respectively. Patients transplanted since 2001 had significantly less moderate and severe rejections (31.6% vs 67.6%, P = 0.0005) with almost half of these patients never developing rejection. CONCLUSIONS: Multivisceral transplantation is now an effective treatment of patients with complex abdominal pathology. The incidences of serious acute rejection and patient survival have improved in the most recent experience. Our results show that the multivisceral graft seems to facilitate engraftment of transplanted organs and raises the possibility that there is a degree of immunologic protection afforded by this procedure.     

Successful living donor intestinal transplantation in crossmatch positive recipients: Initial experience

Sensitized patients tend to have longer waiting times on the deceased donor list and are at increased risk of graft loss from acute or chronic rejection compared to non-sensitized candidates. Desensitization protocols are utilized to decrease the levels of alloantibodies and to convert an initial positive cross-match to prospective donors into a negative crossmatch. These procedures are mostly available in the setting of living donation. Due to the elective nature of the procedure, desensitization protocols can be extended until the desire result is obtained prior to transplantation. We present two cases of successful desensitization protocol applied to living donor intestinal transplant candidates that converted to negative cross-match to their donors. We present two cases of intestinal transplant candidates with a potential living donor to whom they are sensitized. Both cases underwent successful transplantation after desensitization protocol. No evidence of humoral rejection has occurred in either recipient. Living donor intestinal transplantation in sensitized recipients against the prospective donors provides the ability to implement a desensitization protocol to convert to negative crossmatch.     

Outcomes of cPRA 100% deceased donor kidney transplant recipients under the new Kidney Allocation System: A single‐center cohort study

In light of changes in donor/recipient case‐mix and increased cold ischemia times under the Kidney Allocation System (KAS), there is some concern that cPRA 100% recipients might be doing poorly under KAS. We used granular, single‐center data on 109 cPRA 100% deceased donor kidney transplant (DDKT) recipients to study post‐KAS posttransplant outcomes not readily available in national registry data. We found that 3‐year patient (96.4%) and death‐censored graft survival (96.8%) was excellent. We also found that cPRA 100% recipients had a relatively low incidence of T cell–mediated rejection (9.2%) and antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR) (13.8%). T cell–mediated rejection episodes tended to be relatively mild—50% (5 episodes) were grade 1, 50% (5 episodes) were grade 2, and none were grade 3. Only 1 episode was associated with graft loss, but this was in the context of a mixed rejection. Although only 15 recipients (13.8%) developed an AMR episode, 2 of these were associated with a graft loss. Despite the rejection episodes, the vast majority of recipients had excellent graft function 3 years posttransplant (median serum creatinine 1.5 mg/dL). In conclusion, cPRA 100% DDKT recipients are doing well under KAS, although every effort should be made to prevent AMR to ensure long‐term outcomes remain excellent.