Coxsackie B virus infections in women with miscarriage

Serum samples from 1,765 consecutive Sardinian blood donors, negative for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and for antibodies to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (anti-HIV), were evaluated for the presence of antibodies to hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) by second-generation ELISA. Anti-HCV was detected in 25 (1.45%) of the 1,765 donors examined. Anti-HCV was found in 15 of the 1,690 (0.9%) donors with normal alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and in 10 of the 75 (13%) donors with elevated ALT (P < 0.0001). Of the 15 anti-HCV-positive donors with normal ALT, only five (33%) were confirmed to be positive by second-generation RIBA, six (40%) were indeterminate, while four (27%) were RIBA negative. HCV RNA, as detected by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using a set of primers from the 5′-noncoding region, was found in six of the 15 (40%) donors with normal ALT, including five RIBA, positive and one indeterminant. Of the 10 anti-HCV-positive donors with elevated ALT, all were RIBA positive and eight (80%) had detectable HCV RNA. Thus, among ELISA-reactive donors, those with elevated ALT had a significantly higher probability of being positive for secondgeneration RIBA and HCV RNA compared to those with normal ALT levels (P = 0.028). None of the 65 donors with elevated ALT but negative for anti-HCV by ELISA had detectable serum HCV RNA, as compared to eight of 10 anti-HCV ELISApositive donors (P < 0.0001). However, although negative for HBsAg, 12 of the 65 (18%) had serum HBV DNA by PCR. This study demonstrates that the combined use of second-generation ELISA and RIBA anti-HCV assays is highly effective in identifying HCV infection, whereas the specificity of ELISA alone for the screening of blood donors with normal ALT values appears to be limited. In contrast, in donors with elevated ALT levels, there is a positive correlation between second-generation assays (ELISA and RIBA) and HCV viremia. The high proportion of inapparent HBV infection in blood donors with elevated ALT levels underlines the importance of this test for the prevention of transfusion-associated viral hepatitis.     

聚合酶链反应鉴定丙型肝炎病毒母婴传播的状态及其…

采用多种方法,动态检测了１１例丙型肝炎病毒感的孕妇所生的婴儿血抗－ＨＣＶ和ＨＣＶＲＮＡ。发现用合成肽酶联免疫吸附试验检测婴儿抗－ＨＣＶ阳性率显著低于第二低重组抗原ＥＬＩＳＡ;用２ｎｄＥＬＩＳＡ检测,６例婴儿脐血和静脉血抗－ＨＣＶ阳性,５例持续１－５月阴转,１例阳性持续１３个月。     

A comparison between one first generation and three second generation anti-HCV ELISAs: an investigation in high- and low-risk subjects in correlation with recombinant immunoblot assay and polymerase chain reaction

One first generation assay (manufactured by Ortho, test I) and 3 second generation anti-HCV ELISAs (manufactured by Ortho, Abbott, and UBI, tests II-IV) were compared. Sera from 4 different sources were used: (1) intravenous drug-users (IVDUs, n = 50), (2) blood donors (n = 1055), (3) all clinical samples from one day of routine anti-HCV testing (n = 89), (4) hemodialysis patients previously found negative by test I but clinically suspected to have a HCV infection (n = 11). Confirmatory anti-HCV tests were carried out with a second generation recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA II). In sera positive exclusively by test IV, one antibody consumption test (UBI HCV Neutralization EIA) and one further immunoblot assay (INNO-LIA HCV Ab) were used. PCR for HCV RNA was carried out on all hemodialysis patient sera and in the RIBA II positive blood donor sera. The second generation ELISAs discriminated 11 more positive samples than the first generation test (2 IVDUs, 5 blood donors, 4 clinical samples). The 9 sera from blood donors and clinical samples were all RIBA II positive or indeterminate. The second generation tests thus showed increased sensitivity. The second generation tests also showed increased specificity in that 4 samples that were positive by test I but negative by the second generation tests, were also negative by RIBA II. With few exceptions, all RIBA II-positive and most of the indeterminate samples were positive by the second generation ELISAs. With few exceptions, all the RIBA II-negative samples were negative by the second generation ELISAs. Eleven blood donor sera were positive by test IV exclusively where RIBA II and other supplementary assays were negative. The recently introduced second generation anti-HCV ELISAs were found to have a higher sensitivity than the first generation test. The tests also showed a good concordance with the exception of test IV in the group of blood donor sera.     

Low prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection among dentists in Taiwan

To evaluate whether hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is an occupational hazard in the dental environment, serum samples collected in 1990–1991 from 461 dentists were tested for the antibody to HCV (anti-HCV) with first- and second-generation HCV enzyme-linked immunoassays (EIAs). Five of the 363 (1.38%) serum samples were reactive by the first-generation (C100–3) HCV EIA. Of the same 363 samples and the other 98 samples, 3 (0.65%) were reactive by the second-generation EIA. Those samples positive by the first- and/or second-generation HCV EIA were analyzed further by cDNA/polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect the presence of HCV RNA. Only 1 of the 5 first-generation EIA reactive samples were PCR positive. These results are comparable to the anti-HCV prevalence of healthy blood donors (0.95% by C100–3 assay) and pregnant women (0.63% by recombinant immunoblot assay). We conclude that the prevalence of HCV infection among dentists in Taiwan is low, and there is no increased risk of HCV infection through the practice of dentistry, at least in our area. © 1993 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Clinical significance of hepatitis C viral RNA status and its correlation to antibodies to structural HCV antigens in anti-HCV reactive patients with normal liver tests

Extensive serological testing and HCV RNA determination by RT-PCR was performed in serum, PBMCs, and liver tissue in thirteen anti-HCV reactive patients with persistently normal liver tests. Absolute concordance in the status of HCV RNA between serum, PBMCs, and liver was noted. Five patients were HCV RNA positive but only three had mild histological changes. Eight patients were HCV RNA negative in all three sites and had virtually normal liver histology. Patterns of reactivity in RIBA™ 2.0 strip immunoblot assay did not differentiate viremic from nonviremic patients. ELISA testing using multiple individual HCV recombinant antigens from the structural and non-structural regions of HCV demonstrated mean antibody titers to the structural antigens, in particular HCV E2 antibodies, to be significantly lower in HCV RNA negative patients. The status of HCV RNA in the serum appears to infer the status of HCV RNA in the liver and PBMCs in patients with persistently normal liver tests. Patients with persistently normal liver tests and undetectable HCV RNA have probably spontaneously cleared HCV infection. © 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Study on reliability of commercially available hepatitis C virus antibody tests.

The serodiagnosis of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection was analyzed by a recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA) with recombinant proteins encoded by the viral RNA isolated from our patients in Hamburg, Germany. The HCV RNA was amplified by PCR, and proteins encoded by the viral core and the NS3, NS4, and NS5 regions were expressed subsequently in Escherichia coli. The results obtained with our UKE RIBA were compared with the results of the Abbott HCV second-generation enzyme immunoassay (EIA). Serum samples from 270 patients, which were sent to us on the suspicion of HCV hepatitis and which were negative for hepatitis A virus and hepatitis B virus antibodies, were examined. In 227 cases (84.1%), there were identical positive (204 cases, 75.6%) or negative (23 cases, 8.5%) results in both tests. In 32 cases (11.9%), the reactive Abbott second-generation HCV EIA results could not be confirmed by the UKE RIBA and the HCV PCR. In follow-up studies conducted over 1 year, these results did not change. In three cases (1.1%), the UKE RIBA presented a positive result while the Abbott second-generation HCV EIA was negative. All three cases were positive in the HCV PCR and showed seroconversion in an HCV EIA 4 to 6 weeks later. In addition, 33 patient serum samples were examined by UKE RIBA in parallel with the Ortho RIBA 2.0. In three cases (9.1%), a positive Ortho RIBA 2.0 result could not be confirmed by the UKE RIBA and the HCV PCR. All three patients were free of complaints. The UKE RIBA showed also a smaller number of indeterminate results (3.0%) than the Ortho RIBA 2.0 (24.2%). This comparison study demonstrates that the commercially available HCV antibody tests should be further improved.     

Hepatitis C virus infection among pregnant women in Yaounde,Cameroon: prevalence,viremia, and genotypes

Central Africa is considered to be an area of high endemic hepatitis C infection. To determine the prevalence of anti-HCV antibodies, HCV RNA, and the genotype distribution in Cameroon, 1,494 pregnant women attending antenatal care units in Yaounde, Cameroon were screened for HCV infection. Anti-HCV antibodies were detected with a 3rd generation ELISA (Monolisa anti-HCV plus version 2, BioRad, Richmond, CA). All anti-HCV antibody-positive sera were then tested with another 3rd generation ELISA (AxSYM) HCV version 3, Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL) and subsequently for HCV RNA (Amplicor HCV, Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland). Genotype was determined by phylogenetic analysis of the NS5b gene. Seventy-three pregnant women were found to be anti-HCV antibody positive by the first ELISA, but only 28 were anti-HCV positive by both ELISA. The prevalence of anti-HCV antibodies was thus 1.9% (28/1,494) (95% CI: 1.3-2.7%). 21/28 (75%) of the positive samples by both ELISA were HCV RNA positive. The 45 samples that were HCV antibody negative by the second ELISA were also HCV RNA negative. The HCV subtypes identified were 1a (24%), 2f (38%) and 4f (38%). In contrast to previous studies, anti-HCV antibodies were rare among pregnant women in Cameroon. The percentage of HCV seropositive pregnant women who had circulating HCV RNA was similar to that observed in Europe. Several HCV genotypes were found in Cameroon.     

Indeterminate results of the second-generation hepatitis C virus (HCV) recombinant immunoblot assay: significance of high-level c22-3 reactivity and influence of HCV genotypes.

A second-generation recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA 2.0) is used in the United States to confirm infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) in samples that are anti-HCV (enzyme immunoassay) positive. In some cases, indeterminate results of RIBA 2.0, which are defined as reactivity to a single antigen species or reactivity limited to two proteins derived from the same coding region of the HCV genome, are encountered. This study was performed to establish the significance of indeterminate RIBA 2.0 results in relation to HCV RNA detection, high positivity for the c22-3 band, and the HCV genotype as determined by direct DNA sequencing. Ninety-six samples with indeterminate RIBA 2.0 results were studied. HCV RNA was detected in 21 of 34 (62%) samples with high reactivity to c22-3 and in 8 of 62 (13%) samples with low reactivity to c22-3. The HCV genotype distribution in samples that were RIBA 2.0 indeterminate and HCV RNA positive was significantly different from that in samples of a control group with positive results for both the RIBA 2.0 and HCV PCR. These results suggest that highly positive c22-3 samples are likely to be associated with HCV viremia and that infection with less common HCV genotypes is more commonly associated with indeterminate RIBA 2.0 results.     

Automated RIBA Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Strip Immunoblot Assay for Reproducible HCV Diagnosis

A comparison between the CHIRON RIBA hepatitis C virus (HCV) processor and manual systems was performed by using 88 specimens repeatedly reactive by the second-generation HCV enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (HCV 2.0 ELISA) and 111 random specimens from volunteer donors. For the second-generation RIBA HCV strip immunoblot assay (SIA) (RIBA HCV 2.0 SIA), test results correlated strongly between the manual and the automated runs (kappa value, 0.937). For the RIBA HCV 3.0 SIA, the correlation of the test results was also high (kappa value, 0.899). Among the specimens with positive results by RIBA HCV 2.0 and 3.0 SIAs, there was a very strong concordance of the test results between the manual and the automated runs with regard to the reactive bands. Nine samples had discordant results between the manual and the automated runs; this was probably attributable to increased variability in antigen scores close to the cutoff values for both tests. Run-to-run and within-run testing by the CHIRON RIBA HCV Processor System showed a very low rate of conflicting values. In conclusion, the CHIRON RIBA HCV Processor System is capable of performing RIBA HCV 2.0 and 3.0 SIAs accurately with minimal operator involvement. In addition, the CHIRON RIBA HCV Processor System shows excellent reproducibility, with the potential for operator-to-operator and site-to-site variability being greatly reduced. Our data indicate that this novel methodology may be very useful for supplemental anti-HCV testing of specimens repeatedly reactive by ELISA in routine clinical assessments and epidemiologic evaluations.     

Evolution of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection acquired at birth

Objectives Our aim was to analyze the evolution of HCV infection in children infected at birth. Methods Between September 1994 and December 1998 we analyzed in a prospective study 8 children born of anti-HCV and HCV RNA positive women. Each baby was controlled at birth, every 3 months during the first year of life, and then every 6 months searching for anti-HCV antibodies (ELISA 3, RIBA 2-3), HCV RNA (RT PCR), ALT and viral genotype. Results Viral RNA was detectable in the first 3 months of life in all babies (100%) and remained positive during the follow-up. Viral genotypes were the same for mothers and their children. In 6 babies (75%) ALT remained pathologic during follow-up. Conclusions HCV infection in children usually has an asymptomatic outcome; the infection has chronic features in the majority of cases.     

Significance of indeterminate third-generation hepatitis C virus recombinant immunoblot assay.

Indeterminate hepatitis C virus (HCV) third-generation recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA3.0; Ortho Diagnostic Systems) patterns were arbitrarily defined by the manufacturer as the detection of only one antibody out of the four that were sought, namely, c100 (NS4 encoded), c22 (core encoded), c33c (NS3 encoded), and NS5 (NS5 encoded). The aims of the present study were (i) to determine the prevalence of indeterminate RIBA3.0 patterns in patients consecutively tested for anti-HCV antibodies in a university hospital; (ii) to evaluate the significance of these patterns in terms of viral replication, liver disease, and risk factors for HCV; and (iii) to get an insight into the mechanism underlying this peculiar immune response. Among 3,074 serum samples consecutively tested for anti-HCV antibodies, 588 were found to be positive by screening assays. Fifty-nine of them (10%) were RIBA3.0 indeterminate and were compared with 59 RIBA3.0-positive ones. Thirty-one RIBA3.0-indeterminate and 53 RIBA3.0-positive serum samples were HCV RNA positive by PCR (53 versus 90%; P < 10(-6). RIBA3.0-indeterminate and RIBA-3.0-positive patients with positive PCR results were not significantly different for the prevalence of risk factors for HCV infection and elevated serum alanine aminotransferase activities. Immunosuppression, attributable to coexisting human immunodeficiency virus infection, organ transplantation, or the administration of immunosuppressive drugs, was significantly more frequent in PCR-positive, RIBA3.0-indeterminate patients than in PCR-negative, RIBA3.0 indeterminate patients (P < 0.001) and PCR-positive patients with a positive RIBA3.0 result (P < 0.01). The distribution of HCV genotypes did not differ significantly between HCV RNA-positive patients with indeterminate or positive RIBA3.0 results. In conclusion, the prevalence of indeterminate RIBA3.0 patterns in virology laboratories is about 10%; in about half of these patients HCV replication is detected by PCR; the main factor responsible for indeterminate RIBA3.0 patterns could be immunosuppression, whereas HCV genotypes do not seem to play major role.     

Clinical significance of serum hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA as marker of HCV infection.

We have evaluated the clinical significance of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA determination by analyzing a group of 221 hospitalized patients with abnormal liver function tests. Serum HCV RNA was detected by "nested" PCR amplification followed by nonisotopic hybridization. Of the 200 (90.5%) patients with anti-HCV-positive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay results, 152 (76%) were RIBA reactive, 47 (23.5%) had indeterminate results, and 1 (0.5%) was nonreactive. Of the 180 (90%) patients positive for anti-HCV and HCV RNA, 138 (76.7%) were RIBA reactive and 42 (23.3%) were RIBA indeterminate. The pattern of RIBA reactivity did not correlate with the presence of HCV RNA. Elevated alanine aminotransferase levels were associated neither with the presence of viremia nor with the RIBA pattern. Histological findings consistent with non-A non-B hepatitis correlated with the presence of HCV RNA but not with the RIBA pattern. HCV RNA was detected in 11 of 21 (52.4%) anti-HCV-negative patients. These 11 patients were either immunosuppressed or in the prodromic phase of acute hepatitis C. Circulating HCV RNA can therefore be described as being predictive of virus-induced liver damage in anti-HCV-positive patients and may be useful in the diagnosis of HCV infection in anti-HCV-negative immunosuppressed patients or in those with early acute infection.     

丙型肝炎病毒核心抗原在血液透析患者中的检测和应用

目的 探讨丙型肝炎病毒核心抗原酶联免疫吸附法在血液透析患者HCV感染检测中的应用.方法 对本院250名血液透析患者,用第三代酶联免疫吸附试剂盒检测抗.HCV抗体、酶联免疫吸附法检测HCV核心总抗原,用巢式RT-PCR法对阳性标本进行确认.结果 250例血液透析患者中抗-HCV抗体阳性43例(阳性率17.2%),HCV-cAg阳性45例(阳性率18%),经配对x2检验,P=0.839,差异无统计学意义;43例抗-HCV抗体阳性中RT-PCR检测结果 为36例HCV-RNA阳性,其中32例HCV-cAg也呈阳性,另外4例HCV-cAg阴性;45例HCV-cAg阳性标本中HCV-RNA结果 全阳性;13例核心抗原阳性但抗体阴性的患者样本中也含有HCV-RNA,抗-HCV抗体的漏检率为23.2%(13/56);核心抗原阳性标本测出病毒载量是(49258±28682)拷贝/ml,高于抗-HCV抗体阳性组(23938±10780)拷贝/ml(P<0.05);4例核心抗原阴性但抗-HCV抗体及RT-PCR均阳性标本的病毒载量是(306±161)拷贝/ml,明显低于HCV核心抗原阳性组(P<0.001).结论 HCV核心总抗原酶联免疫吸附试验将有益于由于免疫抑制状态、窗口期更长的血液透析患者,与抗-HCV的检测结果 具有互补性;HCV-cAg能很好反映HCV RNA,相对于PCR来说,HCV-cAg检测既具有成本效益好又可减少人力资源,具有广阔的临床应用前景.     

Anti-HCV RIBA/LiaTek reactivity and HCV genotype in EIA-negative patients with viremia.

Individuals infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) usually produce anti-HCV antibodies detectable by enzyme immunoassay (EIA); however, in certain viremic cases this antibody does not appear. To investigate whether anti-HCV in these cases is detectable by Western blot (WB), 38 HCV RNA positive/anti-HCV EIA-negative sera were tested by RIBA 3.0 or LiaTek III. The HCV genotypes (INNO-LiPA) were analyzed to determine whether the variance in these genotypes can be the reason for the late, weak antibody production or its absence. As the control group, 282 EIA-positive/HCV RNA-positive patients were examined. A single band reactivity of various intensities by RIBA or LiaTek was observed in 16/38 EIA negative sera. Positive results with NS3 were detected in 4 sera and weak positive (+/-) with core, NS3, and NS5 in 5, 6, and 1 sera, respectively. In 3 cases with anti-NS3, the seroreversion was observed in follow-up. The distribution of genotypes in anti-HCV-negative versus anti-HCV-positive groups was: 1b alone, 50.0% vs. 78.0%; 3a alone, 13.2% vs. 15.6%; and mixed (1b+3a), 36.8% vs. 5.0%, respectively. The follow-up studies showed that viremia was lost spontaneously in 12/35 patients. In some patients infected with two genotypes, the spontaneous loss of the 3a genotype was observed. The study showed that WB tests are useful for serological confirmation of HCV infection in some EIA negative/HCV RNA-positive patients but, because seroreversion may occur, sequential sera samples should be tested. No unusual HCV genotype was detected in anti-HCV-negative/HCV RNA-positive cases, but the frequency of mixed infection with the 1b+3a genotypes in this group was found to be higher than that in anti-HCV-positive hepatitis patients.     

Evaluation of first- and second-generation RIBA kits for detection of antibody to hepatitis C virus.

Samples reactive by first-generation recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA) to detect antibody to hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) (RIBA-1 [Chiron, Calif.]) remained reactive by a second-generation test (RIBA-2) for HCV antibodies. A total of 75% of specimens indeterminate by RIBA-1 became reactive, 12.5% were nonreactive, and 12.5% remained indeterminate by RIBA-2. Among RIBA-1-nonreactive specimens, 12.0% became positive and 5.1% became indeterminate by RIBA-2. The antigens c33c and c22-3 have increased the sensitivity of RIBA-2.     

A novel double antibody sandwich-lateral flow immunoassay for the rapid and simple detection of hepatitis C virus

The objective of this study was to screen for antigens of the hepatitis?C virus (HCV) to establish a new double antibody sandwich-lateral flow immunoassay (DAS-LFIA) method for testing the presence of anti-HCV antibodies in human serum or plasma. A series of different recombinant HCV proteins in Escherichia coli cells were constructed, expressed, purified and the new DAS-LFIA strip was developed. The sensitivity and specificity of new the DAS-LFIA strip were evaluated by detecting 23?HCV-positive sera, a set of quality control references for anti-HCV detection that contain known amounts of anti-HCV antibodies, and 8?HCV-negative sera. A total of 300?clinical serum samples was examined by both the new DAS-LFIA strip and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Data were analyzed using SPSS?11.5 software. The sensitivity and specificity of the new DAS-LFIA strip were 100%. The lowest test line of the HCV DAS-LFIA strips was 2?NCU/ml. Additionally, the concordance between the new DAS-LFIA strip and ELISA methods was 94.33%. In conclusion, our new testing method is rapid, simple, sensitive and specifically detects the presence of anti-HCV antibodies in human serum or plasma. Therefore, it may be used for monitoring HCV.     

Hepatitis C virus infection in hemodialysis patients in southern Sweden: Epidemiological,clinical, and diagnostic aspects

A prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibodies of 12% was found in 276 patients from 11 dialysis units. Between zero and 22% of the patients in the different units were anti-HCV positive. The epidemiology of HCV was studied in two units during a 2 year period by antibody assays and the polymerase chain reaction and correlated with clinical manifestations. Two types of epidemiologic patterns were found that may explain the wide difference of HCV prevalence described in different dialysis units. In one unit there was no evidence of spread within the unit, and the prevalence of HCV was dependent on the status of the patients entering for treatment. In the other unit, a clustering of infected patients could be seen in which 13 of 36 were infected during a 3 year period. Some patients who had not received blood transfusions were among the infected. Hepatitis C infection was the most common explanation for repeated abnormal transferase levels. Most of the HCV-infected patients reacted both for anti-HCV and HCV RNA. HCV RNA was in general detected earlier than anti-HCV seroconversion. Among 20 HCV RNApositive serum samples that were anti-HCV ELISA-positive 18 had indeterminate and two negative reactions by immunoblot (RIBA 2). Thus the RIBA 2 test should be used with caution as a confirmatory antibody test in this group of patients. © 1993 Wiley-Liss, Inc.