Background:
Undetected perforation during laparoscopic pyloromyotomy can be fatal. Detecting a perforation at the time of laparoscopic pyloromyotomy is difficult. The purpose of this study was to determine whether air insufflation of the stomach reliably detects perforation during laparoscopic pyloromyotomy.Case Reports:
Between 2007 and 2008, 71 patients underwent laparoscopic pyloromyotomy and 2 patients (3.3%) had perforation. Insufflating the stomach with air did not demonstrate the perforation in either case. Both perforations were detected by careful inspection of the myotomy; a small amount of mucus was seen at the perforation site. Both patients underwent open suture repair with an omental patch and had unremarkable postoperative courses.Conclusions:
Air insufflation of the stomach during laparoscopic pyloromyotomy does not reliably rule out perforation. As with all procedures with potential complications, a high index of suspicion and careful inspection of the entire myotomy may help detect perforation. 相似文献Methods: Twenty Clinical Anesthesia year 2 residents, novices in pediatric FI, were randomly assigned to either the traditional group (traditional eyepiece FI) or the video group (video-assisted FI). One of two attending anesthesiologists supervised each resident during FI of 15 healthy children, aged 1-6 yr. The time from mask removal to confirmation of endotracheal tube placement by end-tidal carbon dioxide detection was recorded. Intubation attempts were limited to 3 min; up to three attempts were allowed. The primary outcome measure, time to success or failure, was compared between groups. Failure rate and number of attempts were also compared between groups.
Results: Three hundred patient intubations were attempted; eight failed. On average, the residents in the video group were faster, were three times more likely to successfully intubate at any given time during an attempt, and required fewer attempts per patient compared to those in the traditional group. 相似文献