Comparative bioavailability study of two cefixime formulations administered orally in healthy male volunteers

The bioavailability of a new cefixime ((6R,7R)-7-[(Z)-2-(2-amino-4-thiazolyl)-2-(carboxymethoxyimino) acetamido]-8-oxo-3-vinyl-5-thia-1-azabicyclo-[4,2,0]-oct-2-ene-2-carboxylic acid, CAS 79350-37-1) tablet preparation (Loprax) was compared with that of a reference preparation of the drug in 24 healthy male volunteers. The trial was designed as an open, randomized, single-blind, two-sequence, two-period crossover study. Under fasting conditions, each subject received a single oral dose of 400 mg cefixime tablet as a test or reference formulation on 2 treatment days. The treatment periods were separated by a one-week washout period. The plasma concentrations of the drug were analyzed by a rapid and sensitive HPLC method with UV detection. The pharmacokinetic parameters included AUC0-24h, AUC0-infinity, Cmax, t1/2, and Ke. The mean AUC0-infinity of cefixime was 45008.7 +/- 10989.9 and 45221.3 +/- 2155.7 n x h/ml for the test and reference formulation, respectively. The maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of cefixime was on average 4746.9 +/- 1284 ng/ml for the test and 4726.3 +/- 1206.9 ng/ml for the reference product. No statistical differences were observed for Cmax and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve for test and reference tablets. The calculated 90% confidence intervals based on the ANOVA analysis for the mean test/reference ratios of Cmax, AUC0-infinity and AUC0-24h of cefixime were in the bioequivalence range (94%-112%). Therefore, the two formulations were considered to be bioequivalent.     

Comparative bioavailability study of cefixime (equivalent to 100 mg/5 ml) suspension (Winex vs Suprax) in healthy male volunteers

This investigation was carried out to evaluate the bioavailability of a new suspension formulation of cefixime (100 mg/5 ml), Winex, relative to the reference product, Suprax (100 mg/5 ml) suspension. The bio-availability study was carried out in 24 healthy male volunteers who received a single oral dose (200 mg) of the test (A) and the reference (B) products on 2 treatment days after an overnight fast of at least 10 hours. The treatment periods were separated by a one-week washout period. A randomized, balanced two-way crossover design was used. After dosing, serial blood samples were collected over a period of 16 hours. Plasma concentrations of cefixime were analyzed using a sensitive high-performance liquid chromatographic assay. The pharmacokinetic parameters for cefixime were determined using standard non-compartmental method. The parameters AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity), Cmax, Kel, t1/2 and Cmax/AUC(0-infinity) were analyzed statistically using raw and log-transformed data. The time to maximum concentration (tmax) was analyzed using raw data. The parametric 90% confidence intervals of the mean values of the pnfinity harmacokinetic parameters: AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity) Cmax, and Cmax/AUC(0-infinity) were within the range 80 - 125% which is acceptable for bioequivalence (using log-transformed data). The calculated 90% confidence intervals based on the ANOVA analysis for the mean test/reference ratios of AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity), Cmax, and Cmax/AUC(0-infinity) were 88.93 - 107.10%, 89.09 - 107.11%, 89.63 - 108.58% and 96.85 - 105.29%, respectively. The test formulation was found bioequivalent to the reference formulation with regard to AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity), and Cmax using the Schuirmann's two one-sided t-tests. Therefore, the two formulations were considered to be bioequivalent.     

Bioequivalence study of finasteride. Determination in human plasma by high-pressure liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry

Two different finasteride (CAS 98319-26-7) tablet formulations were evaluated for their relative bioavailability (Flaxin tablets 5 mg, as the test formulation vs reference formulation, tablets 5 mg) in 23 healthy male volunteers who received a single 5 mg oral dose of each preparation. The study was open, randomized with a two-period crossover design and a 7-day washout period. Plasma samples were obtained over a 48-h interval. The finasteride concentrations were determined by high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS). The analytical method developed has a limit of quantitation (LOQ) of 0.50 ng/ml in plasma. For the quality control the measured concentration was 2.05 +/- 0.14 ng/ml (mean +/- SD, n = 30) with a precision of 6.9% and an accuracy of 2.55% at a concentration of the starting solution of 2.00 ng/ml, while with 20.00 ng/ml starting solution the measured concentrations were 20 +/- 0.80 ng/ml (n = 30) with a precision of 3.81% and an accuracy of 0.09%. From the plasma finasteride concentration vs time curves the following pharmacokinetics parameters were obtained: AUC0-48, AUC0-infinity, Cmax, Cmax/AUC0-48, Ke, elimination half-life and tmax. Geometric mean test/reference formulations individual percent ratio was 95.71 for AUC0-48 h and 88.70% for Cmax. The 90% confidence interval for the geometric mean of the individual ratio test/reference formulations was 95.70-120.20% for AUC0-48 h, 94.60-121.30 for AUC0-infinity and 88.70-108% for Cmax. Since for both Cmax or AUC the 90% Cl values are within the interval proposed by the Food and Drug Administration, the test formulation is bioequivalent to the reference formulation for both the rate and extent of absorption after single dose administration.     

Comparative pharmacokinetic and relative bioavailability study of coated and uncoated azithromycin powder for suspension in healthy Bangladeshi male volunteers

Azithromycin (AZT; CAS 83905-01-5) is an efficient antibiotic and is widely prescribed in Bangladesh. The taste of uncoated AZT suspension is bitter. Although several taste masked oral suspensions of AZT are available in Bangladesh, information regarding the bioavailability of these formulations in Bangladeshi population is unavailable. The purpose of this study was to compare the relative bioavailability and other pharmacokinetic properties of two oral formulation of AZT (200 mg/5 ml) suspensions, the uncoated reference product and coated test product (Tridosil 200 mg/5 ml) and to evaluate whether these formulations meet the FDA criteria to assume bioequivalence in Bangladeshi male volunteers. A randomized, single-dose, two-way cross-over, open-label pharmacokinetic study was conducted in 24 healthy male volunteers after administration of a single dose of 500 mg AZT suspension under fasting condition following a washout period of three weeks. Blood samples were collected in different time intervals and analyzed for serum AZT concentration using a validated LC/MS/MS method. The pharmacokinetic parameters were determined by the non-compartmental method. From serum data, the obtained values for test and reference products were 383.21 +/- 11.59 and 432.28 +/- 7.22 ng/ ml for Cmax; 5677.47 +/- 1229.53 and 6144.56 +/- 1098.70 h x ng/ml for AUC(0-120); and 6085.29 +/- 1267.53 and 6694.15 +/- 1222.50 h x ng/ml for AUC(0-infinity), respectively. On analysis of variance, no period or sequence effects were observed for any pharmacokinetic property; however, a significant formulation effect was observed for Cmax and AUMC(0-infinity). The 90% confidence intervals of the test formulation/reference mean ratios of the Intransformed Cmax, AUC(0-120) and AUC(0-infinity) mean values were found to be 87.89% to 89.36%, 87.96% to 95.71% and 86.77% to 94.29% respectively. In this single-dose study of AZT, it was found that the test formulation met the regulatory criteria for bioequivalence to the reference suspension formulation.     

Bioequivalence study of two losartan formulations administered orally in healthy male volunteers

The bioavailability of a new losartan preparation (2-butyl-4-chloro-1-[p-(o-1H-tetrazol-5-ylphenyl)benzyl]imidazole-5-methanol monopotassium salt, CAS 114798-26-4) was compared with the reference preparation of the drug in 24 healthy male volunteers, aged between 19 and 32. The open, randomized, single-blind two-sequence, two-period crossover study design was performed. Under fasting conditions, each subject received a single oral dose of 100 mg losartan as a test or reference formulation. The plasma concentrations of losartan and its active metabolite were analyzed by a rapid and sensitive HPLC method with UV detection. The pharmacokinetic parameters included AUC0-36h, AUC0-infinity, Cmax, t1/2, and Ke. Values of AUC0-infinity demonstrate nearly identical bioavailability of losartan from the examined formulations. The AUC0-infinity of losartan was 2019.92+/-1002.90 and 2028.58+/-837.45 ng x h/ml for the test and reference formulation, respectively. The AUC0-infinity of the metabolite was 10851.52+/-4438.66 and 11041.18 +/-5015.81 ng x h/ml for test and reference formulation, respectively. The maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of losartan was 745.94+/-419.75 ng/ml for the test and 745.74+/-329.99 ng/ml for the reference product and the Cmax of the metabolite was 1805.77+/-765.39 and 1606.22 +/-977.22 ng/ml for the test and reference product, respectively. No statistical differences were observed for Cmax and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve for both losartan and its active metabolite. 90 % confidence limits calculated for Cmax and AUC from zero to infinity (AUC0-infinity) of losartan and its metabolite were included in the bioequivalence range (0.8-1.25 for AUC). This study shows that the test formulation is bioequivalent to the reference formulation for losartan and its main active metabolite.     

Pharmacokinetics of three organic nitrates in Chinese healthy male volunteers

Eighteen Chinese male subjects completed a single-blind, randomized, three-treatment, three-period, cross-over study. In each treatment phase, subjects received a single dose of 20 mg isosorbide dinitrate (CAS 87-33-2, ISDN) intravenous infusion, 20 mg isosorbide 5-mononitrate (CAS 16051-77-7, 5-ISMN) tablet or 20 mg isosorbide 5-mononitrate intravenous infusion. Each consecutive dosing was separated by a washout period of 7 days. Following each dosing, venous blood samples were collected over a period of 16 h. Plasma concentrations of ISDN and its two active metabolites isosorbide 2-mononitrate (2-ISMN), 5-ISMN had been measured by a validated gas chromatographic method. Various pharmacokinetic parameters including AUC0-t, AUC0-infinity, Cmax, tmax, t1/2, Kelm and MRT were determined for the three formulations and found to be in good agreement with literature values. AUC0-t and AUC0-infinity of 5-ISMN tablet and intravenous infusion were 2694 +/- 496 ng x ml(-1) x h vs. 2548 +/- 556 ng x ml(-1) x h and 3266 +/- 624 ng x ml(-1) x h vs. 3178 +/- 769 ng x ml(-1) x h, respectively, and the relative bioavailability of 5-ISMN tablet was 105 +/- 20%. As compared with 5-ISMN intravenous infusion, ISDN can rapidly reach the plateau concentration and metabolize to its active metabolites 5-ISMN and 2-ISMN, which both have vasodilator effect. The results of this study suggest that as evaluated from the pharmacokinetic profiles of the three formulations, 5-ISMN tablet and ISDN intravenous infusion are ideal vasodilators and anti-angina drugs especially in acute conditions due to their rapid onset and long duration of action.     

Pharmacokinetics of ketoconazole administered intravenously to dogs and orally as tablet and solution to humans and dogs

The single-dose pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of three ketoconazole formulations were evaluated using HPLC in five healthy human volunteers and six male mongrel dogs. The human volunteers received 400 mg po of ketoconazole as tablet (Ktab) and solution (Ksol) formulations. The dogs received 400 mg po of Ktab and Ksol, and 376 mg iv of an intravenous dose (Kiv). In humans the AUC value for Ksol (62.21 +/- 21.2 microgram X h/ml; mean +/- SD) was significantly greater than for Ktab (50.0 +/- 15.2 micrograms X h/ml; p less than 0.05). Peak serum concentrations (Cmax), time to peak serum concentrations (tmax), t1/2, and the terminal elimination rate constant (kel) did not differ between Ktab and Ksol. This suggests that the administration of Ksol may be a useful alternative to dosage increases in situations where low bioavailability of ketoconazole in tablet form is suspected. The mean systemic clearance (CLs) of Kiv in dogs was 2.74 +/- 1.10 mL/min/kg, the volume of distribution at steady state (Vdss) was 0.72 +/- 0.28 L/kg, and the half-life was 2.7 +/- 1.6 h. Considerable variability was seen in the AUC of ketoconazole, particularly with the oral preparations. The absolute bioavailability of Ktab was 0.50 +/- 0.38, which did not differ statistically from that of Ksol, 0.56 +/- 0.23. The Ksol showed less variability in AUC, Cmax, and F values than did Ktab, and two dogs with low bioavailability with Ktab (0.04 and 0.07) had substantially greater bioavailability with Ksol (F = 0.96 and 0.57, respectively). Evaluation of Kiv in dogs confirms decreased bioavailability from orally administered tablet formulations of ketoconazole.     

Bioavailability of a new effervescent tablet of diclofenac

OBJECTIVE: The bioavailability of a newly developed effervescent tablet containing 50 mg diclofenac Na (DIC-effervesc) was investigated and compared with an enteric-coated dragée (DIC-enteric). SUBJECTS AND METHOD: 24 healthy, male and informed volunteers (mean body weight 78.8 kg, mean age 31.9 years) received in a randomized cross-over design a single dose of 50 mg diclofenac as DIC-effervesc and DIC-enteric. A total of 19 blood samples were obtained before and up to 12 h after administration according to the different properties of the galenic formulation. Diclofenac was analyzed by a sensitive HPLC method with a lower limit of quantification of 20 ng/ml. The bioavailability was compared as ratios of the geometric means of AUC0-infinity and Cmax. RESULTS: DIC-effervesc shows no lag time, a tmax within 30 min and a double peak of Cmax in 15/24 subjects. The mean Cmax (arithm. mean +/- SD) for DIC-effervesc is 950+/-341 ng/ml (first Cmax) and for DIC-enteric 1364+/-335 ng/ml. The mean AUC0-infinity, (arithm. mean +/- SD) amounts to 1097+/-210 ng/ml x h for DIC-effervesc and 1262+/-220 ng/ml x h for DIC-enteric. Based on the point estimator and the 90% interval DIC-effervesc is bioequivalent in respect to amount absorbed (86.4%; 81.8 - 91.3%). DIC-effervesc was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: The new effervescent tablet of diclofenac Na shows a rapid absorption without lag time, the same amount of absorption and a slightly lower Cmax (caused by a double peak phenomenon) in comparison to the enteric-coated dragee. A rapid onset of therapeutic effect is postulated in acute pain disorders.     

Comparative bioavailability of 4 amoxicillin formulations in healthy human volunteers after a single dose administration

OBJECTIVE: To compare the bioavailability of two amoxicillin oral suspension (250 mg/5 ml) formulations and two amoxicillin capsule (500 mg) formulations (Amoxicilina from Medley S/A Indústria Farmace?tica, Brazil, as test formulations and Amoxil from SmithKline Beecham Laboratórios Ltda., Brazil, as reference formulations) in 48 volunteers of both sexes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was conducted open with a randomized two-period crossover design and a one-week washout period. Plasma samples were obtained over a 12-hour interval. Amoxicillin concentrations were analyzed by combined reversed phase liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) with positive ion electrospray ionization using the selected ion monitoring method. From the amoxicillin plasma concentration vs. time curves the following pharmacokinetic parameters were obtained: AUC(last), AUC(0-infinity) and Cmax. RESULTS: Geometric mean of Amoxicilina/Amoxil 250 mg/5 ml individual percent ratio was 103.70% for AUC(last), 103.15% for AUC(0-infinity) and 106.79% for Cmax. The 90% confidence intervals were 97.82-109.94%, 97.40 to 109.24%, and 96.38-118.33%, respectively. Geometric mean of Amoxicilina/Amoxil 500 mg capsule individual percent ratio was 93.26% for AUC(last), 93.27% for AUC(0-infinity) and 90.74% for Cmax. The 90% confidence intervals were 85.0-102.33%, 85.12-102.31%, and 80.14-102.73%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Since the 90% CI for both Cmax, AUC(last) and AUC(0-inifnity) were within the 80-125% interval proposed by the Food and Drug Administration, it was concluded that Amoxicilina 250 mg/5 ml oral suspension and Amoxicilina 500 mg capsule were bioequivalent to Amoxil 250 mg/5 ml oral suspension and to Amoxil capsule 500 mg, respectively, with regard to both the rate and extent of absorption.     

Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence study of two digoxin formulations after single-dose administration in healthy Chinese male volunteers

The pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability/bioequivalence of two formulations of digoxin (CAS 20830-75-5) were assessed in this paper. The study was conducted in 20 healthy Chinese male volunteers according to an open, randomized, single-blind, 2-way crossover study design with a wash-out phase of 14 days. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic profiling were taken up to 72 h post-dose and digoxin plasma concentrations were determined by a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LCMS/MS) method. Based on the plasma concentration-time data of each individual during two periods, pharmacokinetic parameters, Cmax, AUC0-tau, AUC0-infinity and t1/2, were calculated by applying noncompartmental analysis. Pharmacokinetic data for test and reference formulations were analyzed statistically to evaluate bioequivalence of the two formulations. After oral administration, the values of Cmax Tmax, t1/2, AUC0-tau, AUC0-infinity for test and reference formulations were 2.61 +/- 0.98 and 2.68 +/- 1.09 ng/ mL, 1.0 +/- 0.4 and 1.0 +/- 0.4 h, 27.94 +/- 3.14 and 27.56 +/- 3.86 h, 28.57 +/- 4.99 and 28.77 +/- 6.53 ng x h/mL, 33.44 +/- 4.85 and 33.63 +/- 7.57 ng x h/mL, respectively. Both primary target parameters, AUC0-infinity and AUC0-tau, were tested parametrically by analysis of variance (ANOVA). Relative bioavailabilities were 102.5 +/- 19.2% for AUC0-infinity, 102.0 +/- 19.3% for AUC0-tau. Bioequivalence between test and reference formulations was demonstrated for both parameters, AUC0-infinity and AUC0-tau. The 90% confidence intervals of the T/R-ratios of logarithmically transformed data were in the generally accepted range of 80%-125%, which means that the test formulation is bioequivalent to the reference formulation of digoxin.     

The bioequivalence study of folifer-Z: a new formulation of sustained-release iron and zinc

The bioequivalence of Folifer-Z tablets, a new sustained-release iron and zinc formulation was evaluated and compared to that of Fefol-Z capsules in 30 healthy male subjects. Each subject received a single oral dose of either product according to a randomized two-way crossover design. A washout period of 1 week was allowed after each treatment. Blood samples were obtained over a 24-h period, and iron and zinc concentrations were measured. The pharmacokinetic parameters of Folifer-Z were Cmax (103 +/- 46.2 micrograms/dl), Tmax (5.93 +/- 2.94 h) and AUC0-24 h (1937 +/- 706 micrograms/dl per h), whereas the corresponding Fefol-Z values were Cmax (109 +/- 41.5 micrograms/dl), Tmax (6.64 +/- 2.54) and AUC0-24 h (1865 +/- 699 micrograms/h per dl). Analysis of variance on log-transformed data for Cmax and AUC0-24 h revealed lack of significant differences among the two formulations. The mean relative bioavailability of AUCtest/AUCreference was 1.07 (90% confidence interval range: 99-115%) and for Cmax test/Cmax reference was 0.96 (90% confidence interval range: 88-105%). Regarding the zinc results, the pharmacokinetic parameters of Folifer-Z values were Cmax (101 +/- 20.7 micrograms/dl), Tmax (4.86 +/- 1.53 h) and AUC0-24 h (1944 +/- 202 micrograms/h per dl), while the corresponding Fefol-Z values were Cmax (102 +/- 20.7), Tmax (4.93 +/- 1.51) and AUC0-24 h (1953 +/- 200). Analysis of variance on log-transformed zinc data for Cmax, Tmax and AUC0-24 h revealed lack of significant difference among the two formulations. The mean relative bioavailability of AUCtest/AUCreference was 0.98 (90% confidence interval range; 95-101%) and for Cmax test/Cmax reference was 0.92 (90% confidence interval range: 89-96%). The results also indicate a possible inhibition of zinc absorption by iron content of both formulations. It is concluded that Folifer-Z product is bioequivalent to Fefol-Z product.     

Pharmacokinetics of naftidrofuryl in patients with renal impairment

Naftidrofuryl (CAS 31329-57-4) is used, mainly in elderly patients, in the treatment of various vascular disorders. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the pharmacokinetics of naftidrofuryl after single oral administration of a 200 mg naftidrofuryl tablet (Praxilene) in caucasian male and female subjects with renal impairment versus healthy volunteers. This prospective and open study was conducted in three parallel groups: Group A = healthy subjects with a Cl(CR) > 80 ml/min, Group B = uraemic patients with a 20 < or = Cl(CR) < 40 ml/min, Group C = uraemic patients with a Cl(CR) < 20 ml/min. Blood samples were taken over a period of 32 h after dosing. The mean values (+/-SD) of the pharmacokinetic parameters of naftidrofuryl for group A were as follows: tmax: 1.3 h (median), Cmax: 174 +/- 46 ng/ml, t(1/2 beta): 4.4 +/- 1.1 h, AUC(0-infinity): 1541 +/- 384 ng x h/ml; for group B: tmax: 2.5 h (median), Cmax: 239 +/- 94 ng/ml, t(1/2 beta): 5.0 +/- 1.2 h, AUC(0-infinity): 2361 +/- 751 ng x h/ml; for group C: tmax: 3.0 h (median), Cmax: 236 +/- 104 ng/ml, t(1/2 beta): 5.0 +/- 2.1 h, AUC(0-infinity): 2488 +/- 2003 ng x h/ml. The statistical analysis was performed on the pharmacokinetic parameters with one-way ANOVA in order to compare each group. No significant difference between each group was observed. In conclusion, renal insufficiency did not appear to influence the pharmacokinetic profile of oral naftidrofuryl.     

Bioequivalence of abacavir generic and innovator formulations under fasting and fed conditions

OBJECTIVE: Abacavir sulfate is a synthetic carbocyclic nucleoside analogue indicated for the treatment of HIV-1 infection in combination with other antiretroviral agents. The objective of the current study was to determine the bioequivalence between a generic formulation of abacavir and the innovator product. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 80 subjects were randomly assigned to receive a single 300 mg oral dose of abacavir sulfate as the generic (Ranbaxy-Abacavir, Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd., equivalent to 300 mg of abacavir) and innovator (Ziagen, GlaxoSmithKline) tablet formulations in 2-way crossover studies performed under fasting (n=40) and fed (n=40) conditions. Multiple blood samples were collected over 14 hours and plasma concentrations of abacavir were assayed using an LC/MS/MS method with a limit of quantitation of 25.0 ng/ml. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated using noncompartmental methods. RESULTS: Under fasting conditions, geometric mean area under the curve from time 0 to the last measurable concentration (AUC(0-t)), area under the curve extrapolated to infinity (AUC(0-infinity) and maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax) of abacavir for the generic (5565 ng x h/ml, 5668 ng x h/ml and 2526 ng/ml, respectively) and innovator (5675 ng x h/ml, 5770 ng x h/ml and 2528 ng/ml, respectively) products were very similar. Under fed conditions, mean values of AUC(0-t) AUC(0-infinity) and Cmax for the generic (4487 ng x h/ml, 4571 ng x h/ml and 1841 ng/ml, respectively) and innovator (4574 ng x h/ml, 4654 ng x h/ml and 1781 ng/ml, respectively) formulations were also very similar. Ratios of LSM and 90% confidence intervals of PK parameters between the 2 formulations were within 80.0 - 125.0% under fasting and fed conditions, suggesting that the 2 tablet formulations resulted in similar rate and extent of bioavailability. Adverse events for the generic and innovator products were similar in nature and frequency in the fasting and fed studies. CONCLUSIONS Based on the above results, the generic tablet formulation of abacavir developed by Ranbaxy should be equally effective as the innovator product.     

In vivo bioequivalence study of Sulpirid (GYKI-Alkaloida) and Dogmatil fort (Delagrange) 200 mg sulpiride tablets in healthy volunteers]

A single-dose, "crossover" bioequivalence study was conducted in healthy volunteers by comparing sulpiride serum levels after oral administration of the Test Product Sulpiride (200 mg) (GYKI-Alkaloida) in fasting subjects with those produced after oral administration of a marketed reference product (200 mg) (Delagrange Co., France). Statistical comparisons of Cmax, Tmax and AUC0-infinity have been performed utilizing ANOVA with subject, group, subject within group, period and product as sources of variance. No significant differences between the Test Drug and the Reference Drug considering the pharmacokinetic parameters Cmax, Tmax and AUC0-infinity were found. The 95% confidence intervals were as follows: AUC0-infinity: -20.46% and 31.19%, Cmax: -28.05% and 26.65% and Tmax: -43.53% and 20.67%. In the study for the analysis of Sulpiride a specific HPLC procedure with uv detection (lambda = 228 nm) and an internal standard were applied according to P. Nicolas et al. with modification. Sulpiride levels in serum reached a maximum at 4.4 hr +/- 1.5 (S.D.) following administration of Sulpiride tablet and at 5.0 hr +/- 0.8 (S.D.) after Dogmatil fort tablet. The maximal serum concentrations were 506.1 ng/ml +/- 87.2 (S.D.) and 509.1 ng/ml +/- 101.9 (S.D.) for Sulpiride and Dogmatil fort, respectively. The half-life of Sulpiride in serum was 9.9 hr +/- 1.3 (S.D.) following dosing with Dogmatil fort tablet and 12.2 hr +/- 3.0 (S.D.) following dosing with Sulpiride tablet.     

Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence study of a generic amlodipine tablet formulation in healthy male volunteers

Two different tablets containing amlodipine besylate (CAS 111470-99-6) (Vazkor 10 mg tablet as test preparation and 10 mg tablet of the originator product as reference preparation) were investigated in 18 healthy male volunteers in order to compare the bioavailability and prove the bioequivalence between both treatments after oral single dose administration. The study was performed according to an open-label, randomized, two-period cross-over design with a wash-out phase of 21 days. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic profiling were taken up to 144 h post-dose, and amlodipine plasma concentrations were determined with a validated LC-MS/MS method. Maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax) of 6,183.7 pg/ml (test) and 5,366.7 pg/ml (reference) were achieved. Areas under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(0-infinity)) of 267,231.0 pg x h/ml (test) and 266,061.7 ng x h/ml (reference) were calculated. The median tmax was 5.6 h (test) and 6.1 h (reference). Plasma elimination half-lives (t 1/2) were 46.46 h (test) and 45.34 h (reference). Both primary target parameters AUC(0-infinity) and Cmax were tested parametrically by analysis of variance (ANOVA); 90% confidence intervals were between 93.20%-107.16% (AUC(0-infinity) and 103.36%-123.13% (Cmax). Bioequivalence between test and reference preparation was demonstrated since for both parameters AUC and Cmax the 90% confidence intervals of the T/R-ratios of logarithmically transformed data were in the generally accepted range of 80%-125%.     

Pharmacokinetic study of a new oral buffered acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) formulation in comparison with plain ASA in healthy volunteers.

A single-blind, randomized, crossover pharmacokinetic study was carried out to investigate the bioavailability of a new oral buffered 325 mg acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) formulation (ASPIRINA 03) in comparison with a 325 mg plain tablet. Twelve healthy volunteers of both sexes, aged between 20 and 37 years, received buffered or plain ASA on two separate occasions with a wash-out interval of at least two weeks. ASA and salicylic acid (SA) plasma levels were determined by a chromatographic method. The results showed no difference between the area under concentration time curve (AUC0-infinity) ASA values of both formulations (p = 0.19), and buffered ASA relative bioavailability was 102.49% (= bioequivalence). A significant difference was found between the AUC0-30 min ASA values: 90.5 micrograms. min/ml with buffered and 67.7 micrograms. min/ml with the plain tablet (p less than 0.05). The buffered ASA time of maximum concentration was shorter (28 +/- 8 min) than the plain one (38 +/- 19 min, p less than 0.05). The plasma concentrations and pharmacokinetic parameters of SA were not significantly different after the administration of the two ASA formulations. The plain ASA tablet had a significantly lower (p less than 0.05) dissolution rate than buffered ASA tablet. Moreover, the buffered ASA tablet significantly (p less than 0.01) increased the pH by 0.5 units. In conclusion, the bioavailability of the new oral buffered ASA was equivalent to that of plain ASA, but the plasma concentration peak was reached in a shorter time.     

A randomized, crossover study to determine bioequivalence of two brands of dexibuprofen 400 mg tablets in healthy Asian adult male subjects of Indian origin

AIM: To estimate the bioavailability and evaluate bioequivalence of a single dose of a dexibuprofen tablet (test formulation, containing dexibuprofen 400 mg, manufactured by Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Pune, India) and to compare it with that of a single dose of a Seractil tablet (reference formulation, containing dexibuprofen 400 mg, manufactured by Genus Pharmaceuticals, Bershire, UK) under fasting conditions. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Using a two-treatment, two-period, two-sequence, randomized crossover design, test and reference formulations were administered as individual single doses to 24 healthy adult Asian male subjects of Indian origin under non-fed conditions, with 4 days washout period between dosing. 17 blood samples were drawn from each subject over a 12-hour period. Pharmacokinetic parameters, Cmax, AUC0-t, AUC0-infinity and Cmax/AUC0-infinity were calculated from the plasma concentration-time data of each individual and during each period by applying non-compartmental analysis. Analysis of variance was carried out using logarithmically transformed and non-transformed values of the stated pharmacokinetic parameters. Data for test and reference formulations were analyzed statistically to test for bioequivalence of the two formulations. RESULTS: All 24 subjects who received the two formulations on two occasions with a washout period of 4 days, completed the study and provided an adequate amount of blood at each sampling point. After oral administration the values of Cmax (microg/ml), tmax (h), AUC0-t (microg/ml x h), AUC0-infinity (microg/ml x h) for reference and test formulations were 23.501 and 22.948, 1.156 and 1.281, 69.795 and 68.455, and 72.454 and 70.208, respectively. ANOVA and CI test showed no significant (p > 0.05) variation in these pharmacokinetic parameters of test and reference formulations. When the AUC0-t values for both formulations for non-transformed and log-transformed data were compared, the test formulation showed a bioavailability of 98.08% and 99.56%, respectively, as compared to reference formulation. These values are within the acceptance limit of 80 - 120%. No adverse events were observed in any of the subjects during the two runs of the study. Both clinical and laboratory parameters of all subjects showed no clinically significant changes. CONCLUSION: The test formulation containing dexibuprofen 400 mg (manufactured by Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Pune, India) was bioequivalent to reference formulation (Seractil, manufactured by Genus Pharmaceuticals, Berkshire, UK). Both formulations were well tolerated. The test formulation can be considered a pharmaceutically and therapeutically equivalent alternative to Seractil.     

Bioequivalence study of two amoxicillin formulations

A randomized single-dose crossover study was conducted in 24 healthy male volunteers to compare the bioavailability of two amoxicillin (CAS 26787-78-0) formulations, Glomox tablet (test) and a commercially available original preparation, amoxicillin capsule (reference). One thousand milligram of each formulation were administered after an overnight fast with a washout period of three days. Sixteen blood samples were collected over 10 h, amoxicillin concentrations in deproteinized serum were determined by a high performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) assay, and pharmacokinetic parameters were analyzed by the standard non-compartmental method. Mean +/- SD maximum concentration (Cmax), time to reach maximum concentration (Tmax), area under the curve (AUC0-->t and AUC0-->infinity), and elimination half-life (t1/2) were 13.30 +/- 4.52 and 12.99 +/- 3.56 microg/ml, 1.92 +/- 0.76 and 2.02 +/- 0.62 h, 42.50 +/- 13.62 and 42.24 +/- 12.35 microg x h/ml, 46.31 +/- 13.23 and 46.08 +/- 12.14 microg x h/ml, and 1.54 +/- 0.39 and 1.48 +/- 0.48 h for the test and reference formulation, respectively. The parametric 90 % confidence intervals of the mean of the difference (test-reference) between log-transformed values of the two formulations were 92.61% to 109.50%, 92.83% to 109.12%, and 93.11% to 109.41% for AUC0-->t, AUC0-->infinity, and Cmax, respectively. The results indicate that the two formulations can be considered equivalent with regard to the rate and extent of absorption under fasting conditions.     

Effect of ensure on the oral bioavailability of gatifloxacin in healthy volunteers

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of Ensure on the relative oral bioavailability of gatifloxacin in healthy volunteers. DESIGN: Single-dose, randomized, crossover study. SETTING: University-affiliated research center. SUBJECTS: Twelve healthy volunteers (six men, six women) aged 18 years or older with no clinically significant abnormal findings on physical examination or in medical history. Intervention. Subjects consumed 120 ml of study liquid-water or Ensure-every 30 minutes for five doses. With the second dose, subjects ingested a single gatifloxacin 400-mg tablet that had been uniformly crushed and mixed into the study liquid. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Serial blood samples were collected for 48 hours, and gatifloxacin concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. Pharmacokinetic data were analyzed by using noncompartmental methods. Maximum serum concentration (Cmax) and area under the serum concentration-time curve from zero to infinity (AUC0-infinity) were tested for bioequivalence after log-transformation of the data. Comparison of parameters for gatifloxacin administered with water versus those with Ensure showed that Cmax (4.35 +/- 0.90 vs 2.41 +/- 0.58 mug/ml, p<0.0001) and AUC(0-infinity) (42.4 +/- 10.1 vs 31.3 +/- 8.3 mg*hr/L, p<0.0001) were significantly decreased with Ensure, and bioequivalence was not achieved for either parameter. The geometric least squares mean ratio was 0.553 (90% confidence interval [CI] 0.501-0.611) for Cmax and 0.730 (90% CI 0.664-0.802) for AUC0-infinity. The median time to reach Cmax was significantly prolonged when gatifloxacin was administered with Ensure versus that with water (2.5 hrs vs 1.0 hr, p=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: The Cmax and AUC0-infinity of gatifloxacin were significantly decreased when the drug was administered with Ensure. The clinical significance of these findings will depend on the offending pathogen and its susceptibility to gatifloxacin.     

Investigation of the bioavailability of hypericin, pseudohypericin, hyperforin and the flavonoids quercetin and isorhamnetin following single and multiple oral dosing of a hypericum extract containing tablet

The objective of these two open phase I clinical trials was the investigation of the bioavailability of five constituents from a hypericum extract containing tablet, which are discussed as the components contributing to the antidepressant action. Each trial included 18 healthy male volunteers who received the test preparation, containing 612 mg dry extract of St John's wort (STW-3, Laif 600), either as a single oral dose or as a multiple once daily dose over a period of 14 days. Concentration/time curves were determined for hypericin, pseudohypericin, hyperforin, the flavonoid aglycone quercetin, and its methylated form isorhamnetin for 48 h after single dosing and for 24 h on day 14 at the end of 2 weeks of continuous daily dosing. After single dose intake, the key pharmacokinetic parameters were determined as follows: hypericin: area under the curve (AUC(0-infinity)) = 75.96 h x ng/ml, maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) = 3.14 ng/ml, time to reach Cmax (t(max)) = 8.1 h, and elimination half-life (t1/2) = 23.76 h; pseudohypericin: AUC(0-infinity) = 93.03 h x ng/ml, Cmax = 8.50 ng/ml, t(max) = 3.0 h, t1/2 = 25.39 h; hyperforin: AUC(0-max) = 1009.0 h x ng/ml, Cmax = 83.5 nglml, t(max) = 4.4 h, t1/2 = 19.64 h. Quercetin and isohamnetin showed two peaks of maximum plasma concentration separated by about 4 h. Quercetin: AUC(0-infinity) = 318,7 h x ng/ml, Cmax (1) = 47.7 ng/ml, t(max) (1) = 1.17 h, Cmax (2) = 43.8 ng/ml, t(max) (2) = 5.47 h, t1/2 = 4.16 h; isorhamnetin: AUC(0-infinity) = 98.0 h x ng/ml, Cmax (1) = 7.6 ng/ml, t(max) (1) = 1.53 h, Cmax (2) = 9.0 ng/ml, t(max), (2) = 6.42 h, t1/2 = 4.45 h. Under steady state conditions reached during multiple dose administration similar results were obtained. Further pharmacokinetic characteristics calculated from the obtained data were the mean residence time (MRT), the lag-time, the peak-trough fluctuation (PTF), the lowest observed plasma concentration (Cmin), and the average plasma concentration (Cav). The data obtained for hypericin, pseudohypericin and hyperforin generally corresponded well with values previously published, with some deviations observed for the extent of absorption of hypericin and the time course of absorption and elimination of hyperforin. The kinetic characteristics of the hypericum flavonoids are reported here for the first time. The trial preparation was well tolerated.