The potencies of edrophonium and neostigmine as antagonists of pancuronium

Dose response curves were constructed for edrophonium and neostigmine when used to antagonise pancuronium, 0.07 mg/kg during thiopentone-nitrous oxide-halothane anaesthesia. The antagonist was given when 10% twitch height had been restored and the effect was measured 10 minutes later. Recoveries to 50% and 90% twitch height were achieved with 167 and 828 micrograms/kg of edrophonium, and 10.5 and 51 micrograms/kg of neostigmine. The dose response curves were parallel and neostigmine was 16 times more potent than edrophonium. Combinations of equipotent doses of edrophonium and neostigmine were also administered and produced additive but not synergistic effects. It is concluded that either edrophonium or neostigmine may be used for the reversal of pancuronium neuromuscular blockade, but the combination of the two offers no advantage.     

Priming with anticholinesterases — the effect of different combinations of anticholinesterases and different priming intervals

This study was designed to investigate the effect of different combinations of neostigmine and edrophonium when administered in divided doses and the effect of different intervals (priming intervals) between the doses. Seventy-two patients divided into 12 groups (n = 6 in each) were included in the study. An initial dose of neostigmine 0.012 mg.kg-1 or edrophonium 0.2 mg.kg-1 was administered, followed at different priming intervals (1, 2 or 3 min) by either edrophonium 0.8 mg.kg-1 or neostigmine 0.048 mg.kg-1 for antagonism of atracurium-induced neuromuscular blockade. Reversal was attempted at 10 per cent spontaneous recovery of twitch height. Adequate reversal of neuromuscular block (train-of-four ratio of 0.75) was achieved in all patients. Significant (p less than 0.05) acceleration of the recovery index (time taken for the twitch height to recover from 25 to 75 per cent of control) and reversal time (time taken from the end of injection of the priming dose until TOF ratio value had reached 0.75) was obtained in groups which received edrophonium-edrophonium combination. Recovery indices and reversal times were found to be significantly shorter (p less than 0.05) with a 1 min priming interval. In two additional groups of patients premedicated and anaesthetized as the others equipotent mixtures of the antagonists were administered as a single bolus dose. Reversal times were significantly longer (p less than 0.05) when compared to those given the same amounts of the combination but in divided doses with a 1 min priming interval.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Neostigmine and edrophonium as antagonists of atracurium and pancuronium

Edrophonium 0.5 mg/kg or neostigmine 0.04 mg/kg were administered to two groups of 30 patients each for antagonism of atracurium- or pancuronium-induced neuromuscular block at 25% single twitch recovery. Neuromuscular block was studied using both single twitch and train-of-four (TOF) nerve stimulation. The times to 100% single twitch recovery were significantly more rapid for patients receiving edrophonium (P less than 0.01) in both groups (atracurium and pancuronium); the TOF ratios were similar for atracurium, but for pancuronium they were greater after neostigmine than after edrophonium, and only at 25 min were these ratios similar. It is concluded that edrophonium in a dose of 0.5 mg/kg antagonizes neuromuscular blockade induced by atracurium, as does neostigmine in a dose of 0.04 mg/kg, but the former does not consistently antagonize neuromuscular blockade induced by pancuronium even at 25% of single twitch recovery.     

Profound atracurium induced neuromuscular blockade

Speed of reversal of profound atracurium induced neuromuscular blockade following edrophonium (0.5 or 1.0 mg/kg) or neostigmine (0.04 or 0.08 mg/kg) was measured using the train-of-four pattern of nerve stimulation. In all patients adequate clinical reversal was present when the ratio of the strength of the fourth to the first twitch (T4 ratio) was 0.5. Both doses of edrophonium were associated with a significantly faster speed of reversal than the smaller dose of neostigmine (p less than 0.05 in both cases). However, the larger dose of neostigmine was associated with a reversal time approaching that of edrophonium. Possible explanations for these findings are discussed in terms of contemporary theories of neuromuscular pharmacology.     

Dose-response relationships for edrophonium and neostigmine as antagonists of moderate and profound atracurium blockade

To measure the ability of neostigmine and edrophonium to reverse moderate and profound atracurium blockade, dose-response relationships were established for these reversal agents given at 1% and 10% twitch height recovery. Eighty-five ASA I and II adult patients received atracurium, 0.4 mg/kg, during a thiopental-nitrous oxide-enflurane anesthetic. Train-of-four stimulation was applied every 12 seconds, and the force of contraction of the adductor pollicis muscle was recorded. Edrophonium, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, or 1 mg/kg; neostigmine, 0.005, 0.01, 0.02 or 0.05 mg/kg; or no reversal agent was given when there was either 1% or 10% recovery of the first twitch response. With profound blockade, the slope of the edrophonium dose-response relationship was significantly flatter (P less than 0.05) than that of neostigmine. The dose of neostigmine required to achieve 80% first twitch recovery (ED80) after 10 minutes was 0.013 +/- 0.003 mg/kg (mean +/- SEM) if given at 10% recovery, and 0.032 +/- 0.004 mg/kg if given at 1% recovery. The ED80 for edrophonium was 0.22 +/- 0.04 mg/kg and 1.14 +/- 0.33 mg/kg, respectively. These values corresponded to neostigmine:edrophonium potency ratios of 16.6 +/- 3.5 and 35.3 +/- 8.9 at 90% and 99% blockade respectively (P less than 0.006). We conclude that the relative potency of neostigmine is greater than that of edrophonium for antagonism of profound atracurium blockade.     

Conditions to optimise the reversal action of neostigmine upon a vecuronium-induced neuromuscular block

Background: Since neostigmine was introduced for reversal of neuromuscular block, there has been controversy about the optimum dose for antagonizing neuromuscular block. The purpose of this study was to characterise recovery of neuromuscular transmission following a vecuronium-induced block 15 min after neostigmine administration using different stimulation patterns, and to determine the effects of different doses of neostigmine given at various pre-reversal twitch heights. Methods: Adductor pollicis (AP) mechanical activity in response to low (0.1 and 2 Hz) and high (50 and 100 Hz) frequency stimulation, was recorded 15 min after 20, 40 and 80 μg/kg neostigmine, given to reverse a vecuronium-induced block at 10, 25 and 50% pre-reversal twitch height (TH). Fifty four ASA class I and II anaesthetised (methohexital, fentanyl, N₂O/O₂) young adult patients were studied and randomly allocated into 9 groups of 6 patients each. Results: In contrast to twitch height (TH) and residual force after 50 Hz, 5 s tetanic stimulation (RF50_Hz), the greater sensitivity of train-of-four (TOF) ratio and residual force after 100 Hz, 5 s tetanic stimulation (RF100_Hz) points out the best reversal conditions (prereversal TH and the optimal neostigmine dose) (P<0.001, two-way analysis of variance). The highest reversal scores (about 0.9 TOF ratio and RF100_Hz) were obtained when 40 μg/ kg of neostigmine was given at 25 and 50% TH. A 0.9 TOF ratio was also observed when 40 μg/kg of neostigmine was given at 10% TH, but, under these conditions, RF100_Hz was only 0.6 (P<0.05, Duncan test). Conclusion: To optimise the reversal action of neostigmine in order to obtain the highest neuromuscular transmission recovery (0.9 TOF ratio and RF100_Hz) during a vecuronium-induced neuromuscular block, the 40 μg/kg dose has to be given at 25 to 50% recovery of TH.     

Recovery times following edrophonium and neostigmine reversal of pancuronium, atracurium, and vecuronium steady-state infusions

The ability of edrophonium and neostigmine to antagonize nondepolarizing neuromuscular blockade produced by steady-state infusions of atracurium, pancuronium, and vecuronium was studied in 71 adult patients anesthetized with nitrous oxide and halothane. Infusion rates of blocking drugs were adjusted so that single twitch depression as measured by the evoked integrated EMG of the hypothenar muscles was kept at 10% of control. Two minutes after the termination of the infusion either edrophonium (0.75 mg/kg) or neostigmine (0.05 mg/kg) was administered. Single twitch depression and train-of-four (T4/T1) fade was recorded during the recovery period. T4/T1 fade ratios observed at 20 min postreversal were 0.80 (atracurium-edrophonium); 0.76 (vecuronium-edrophonium); 0.44 (pancuronium-edrophonium); 0.95 (atracurium-neostigmine); 0.89 (vecuronium-neostigmine); and 0.68 (pancuronium-neostigmine). Under conditions of this study neostigmine produced more rapid and complete recovery than did edrophonium. Although edrophonium produced adequate antagonism of atracurium if 20-30 min were allowed to elapse, edrophonium reversal of pancuronium was rarely acceptable even at 30 min. Increasing the dose of edrophonium to 1.0 mg/kg produced single twitch values of 0.90 at 5 min postreversal but did not increase the rate of recovery of the train-of-four fade ratio. Neostigmine reversal of pancuronium, on the other hand, generally produced T4/T1 ratios of greater than 0.70 in 20-30 min. Although the pattern of recovery seen after reversal of vecuronium was in general quite similar to that seen after atracurium, two patients in the vecuronium-edrophonium group showed delayed recovery and also failed to respond significantly to subsequent doses of neostigmine.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Dose-response relationships for edrophonium and neostigmine as antagonists of atracurium and vecuronium neuromuscular blockade

To determine the potencies of edrophonium and neostigmine as antagonists of nondepolarizing neuromuscular blockade produced by atracurium and vecuronium, dose-response curves were constructed for both antagonists when given at 10% spontaneous recovery of first twitch height. Ninety ASA physical status 1 and 2 adults were given either 0.4 mg/kg atracurium or 0.08 mg/kg vecuronium during thiopental-nitrous oxide-enflurane anesthesia. Train-of-four stimulation was applied to the ulnar nerve every 12 s, and the force of contraction of the adductor pollicis muscle was recorded. When spontaneous recovery of first twitch height reached 10% of its initial control value, edrophonium (0.1, 0.2, 0.4, or 1 mg/kg) or neostigmine (0.005, 0.01, 0.02, or 0.05 mg/kg) was administered by random allocation. Neuromuscular function in another ten subjects was allowed to recover spontaneously. Assisted recovery was defined as actual recovery minus mean spontaneous recovery observed in patients who were not given antagonists. First twitch recovery was initially more rapid when vecuronium was antagonized compared with atracurium, but no difference was detected after 10 min. At 10 min the neostigmine ED80 was 0.022 +/- 0.003 (SEM) mg/kg after atracurium and 0.024 +/- 0.003 mg/kg after vecuronium. The edrophonium ED80 was 0.44 +/- 0.11 mg/kg with atracurium and 0.46 +/- 0.12 mg/kg with vecuronium, giving a neostigmine:edrophonium potency ratio of 20. Atracurium train-of-four fade could be antagonized more easily with edrophonium, whereas that of vecuronium was more easily antagonized by neostigmine. It is concluded that edrophonium and neostigmine are not equally effective against atracurium and vecuronium.     

Reversal of rocuronium with edrophonium during propofol versus sevoflurane anesthesia

BACKGROUND: The use of volatile anesthetics for maintenance of anesthesia can enhance the action of non-depolarizing muscle relaxants and interfere with the reversal of neuromuscular blockade. In this study, we studied the antagonism of rocuronium with edrophonium-atropine during propofol- versus sevoflurane-based anesthesia. METHODS: Following induction of anesthesia with propofol (2-2.5 mg kg(-1), i.v.) and fentanyl (1-2 microg kg(-1) i.v.), rocuronium 0.6 mg kg(-1) i.v. was administered to facilitate tracheal intubation. Patients were then randomized to receive either a propofol infusion (100 microg kg(-1) min(-1)) or sevoflurane (1.0%, end-tidal) in combination with nitrous oxide 66% for maintenance of anesthesia. Neuromuscular blockade was monitored using electromyography at the wrist, and reversed with edrophonium 1.0 mg kg(-1) and atropine 0.015 mg kg(-1) when the first twitch hight (T1) of the train-of-four (TOF) stimulation recovered to 25% of the baseline value. Anesthetic maintenance with propofol or sevoflurane was continued following reversal until a TOF ratio of 0.7 was attained. RESULTS: The clinical duration of action (i.e., time to 25% T1 recovery) was similar during both propofol- (39.3+/-14.6 min) and sevoflurane-based (48.1+/-19.7 min) anesthesia. However, the reversal time from 25% T1 to TOF ratio of 0.7 was significantly longer with sevoflurane [Median 2.8 (range 0.5-18.8) min] compared with propofol [1.5 (0.75-3) min] (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the clinical duration of action after a single dose of rocuronium, 0.6 mg kg(-1) i.v., was similar during both propofol- and sevoflurane-based anesthesia. However, the reversal of rocuronium-induced residual blockade was slower and more variable in the presence of sevoflurane.     

Neostigmine and edrophonium antagonism of varying intensity neuromuscular blockade induced by atracurium, pancuronium, or vecuronium

To compare the time course of neostigmine and edrophonium antagonism of varying intensity neuromuscular blockade induced by atracurium, pancuronium, or vecuronium, the authors studied 98 patients anesthetized with nitrous oxide (60%) and halothane or enflurane. Neuromuscular blockade, as monitored by single stimulus-induced twitch tension (TT), was antagonized at varying degrees of spontaneous recovery (2-80% of control TT). Time to antagonism (time from injection of neostigmine or edrophonium to 90% recovery of control TT) was not different between edrophonium, 0.5 mg/kg, and neostigmine, 0.04 mg/kg, when spontaneous recovery had been allowed to occur to at least 11% of control TT prior to antagonist administration (P greater than 0.05). For profound neuromuscular blockade (TT less than or equal to 10% of control) induced by pancuronium or vecuronium, time (mean +/- SD) to antagonism with neostigmine, 0.04 mg/kg, was 7.0 +/- 2.2 min and 5.6 +/- 1.7 min, respectively, while the same for edrophonium, 0.5 mg/kg, was 20.0 +/- 8.0 min and 15.0 +/- 12.5 min, respectively (P less than 0.05). Time to antagonism of profound atracurium-induced neuromuscular blockade was 8.5 +/- 3.3 min for neostigmine, 0.04 mg/kg, and 9.8 +/- 7.0 min for edrophonium, 0.5 mg/kg, (P less than 0.05). For profound vecuronium-and pancuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade, time to antagonism by edrophonium, 1.0 mg/kg, was 4.6 +/- 3.0 min and 3.9 +/- 1.6 min respectively. The authors conclude that neostigmine, 0.04 mg/kg, antagonizes neuromuscular blockade within 12 min when TT is greater than 2% of control at time of reversal. When TT is greater than 10% of control, edrophonium, 0.5 mg/kg, produces similar time to antagonism.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Antagonism of an intubation dose of vecuronium

To study the problem of rapid antagonization of an intubation dose of vecuronium (0.08 mg/kg), 36 surgical patients undergoing barbiturate/halothane anesthesia were given edrophonium 0.5, 0.75, and 1.0 mg/kg or neostigmine 0.04, 0.06, and 0.08 mg/kg precisely 5 min following injection of the muscle relaxant. T1 twitch (T1/Tc) and train-of-four (TOF) ratios (T4/T1) of the hypothenar muscle were monitored every 20 s with the aid of a commercially available EMG monitor (Datex-Relaxograph). As documented by T1 and T4/T1 follow-up curves (Figs. 1 and 2) and derived parameters of relaxation as well (Dur25, Dur50, Dur75, recovery index, and reversal time; Table 4), both edrophonium and neostigmine resulted in a significantly shorter duration of vecuronium blockade (P less than 0.001). The mean time for recovery of TOF ratio to above 0.7 was between 10.8 +/- 6.0 (neostigmine 0.08 mg/kg) and 21.2 +/- 7.8 (neostigmine 0.06 mg/kg) min (mean +/- SD) following injection of the antagonist as compared to 58 +/- 18.4 min in the control group (P less than 0.001). Recurarization did not occur. Differences between drugs and dose-dependent effects were minimal; edrophonium did not prove superior to neostigmine with the exception of less pronounced muscarinic side effects, hence less bradycardia and a minimum heart rate of 57 +/- 8.2 bpm 20 min after the injection of neostigmine as opposed to 72 +/- 8.2 bpm following edrophonium (P less than 0.05; Fig. 4). As to the restitution of a ventilatory force sufficient to allow spontaneous breathing, no definite conclusions can be made.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Train-of-Four recovery after pharmacologic antagonism of pancuronium-, pipecuronium-, and doxacurium-induced neuromuscular block in anaesthetized humans

Previous studies have suggested that the increased duration of action of long-acting neuromuscular relaxants may make their pharmacologic antagonism more difficult and, thus, increase the likelihood of residual block. This hypothesis was tested in healthy, adult humans who received a background of isoflurane/N₂O/fentanyl anaesthesia.
Study subjects were paralyzed with either pancuronium (N=8), pipecuronium (N=8), or the longer-acting relaxant, doxacurium (N=8). Neuromuscular function was monitored, and, using a blinded, randomized study design, the relaxants were titrated to identify the ED₉₅ dose in each patient. Thereafter, spontaneous recovery was observed until there was 25% ofbaseline response to the first supramaximal twitch (Tl) in a train-of-four (TOF). At this time, the block was antagonized with neostigmine 0.07 mg/kg and glycopyrrolate 0.014 mg/kg i.v., and recovery of TOF was recorded.
Spontaneous recovery to 25% of the baseline Tl response occurred at 52± 14 min (mean±SD) following administration of either pancuronium and pipecuronium, and 85 ±33 min following doxacurium ( P <0.05 for doxacurium versus pancuronium and pipecuronium). In doxacurium-rreated patients, reversal of block with neostigmine was less predictable and less complete than with the other two relaxants. For example, the ratio of the fourth to first twitch (T4/T1) of the TOF at 10 and 15 min after reversal was significantly less with doxacurium (59 ±14% and 61±16%, respectively) than with either pancuronium (75±6% and 75±10%) or pipecuronium (76±9% for both). At 30 min post-neostigmine, the incidence of residual block (i.e. T4/T1 <0.70) was: pancuronium 2 patients, pipecuronium 1 patient, and doxacurium 5 patients.
These studies support the hypothesis that incomplete reversal of neuromuscular block is more likely with longer-acting neuromuscular relaxants.     

Dose-response curves for edrophonium, neostigmine, and pyridostigmine after pancuronium and d-tubocurarine

To determine the potencies of neostigmine, pyridostigmine, and edrophonium in reversing pancuronium and d-tubocurarine blockade, dose-response curves were established for first twitch height recovery and train-of-four ratio. One hundred and twenty ASA physical status I or II patients scheduled for elective surgery received either 0.06 mg/kg pancuronium or 0.36 mg/kg d-tubocurarine during a thiopental-nitrous oxide-enflurane anesthetic. Train-of-four stimulation was applied every 12 s, and the force of contraction of the adductor pollicis muscle was recorded. When first twitch height had recovered spontaneously to 10% of its initial value, neostigmine (0.005, 0.01, 0.02 or 0.05 mg/kg), pyridostigmine (0.02, 0.04, 0.1, or 0.2 mg/kg), or edrophonium (0.1, 0.2, 0.4 or 1 mg/kg) was injected by random allocation. Recovery was measured 10 min after the injection of the antagonist. First twitch ED50's were 0.013, 0.085, and 0.17 mg/kg after pancuronium, and 0.017, 0.11, and 0.27 mg/kg after d-tubocurarine, for neostigmine, pyridostigmine, and edrophonium, respectively. The ED50 for pyridostigmine and edrophonium obtained after d-tubocurarine was significantly larger (P less than 0.05) than that after pancuronium. The train-of-four dose-response curves were significantly flatter for edrophonium than for the other two agents, indicating a greater ability of edrophonium to antagonize fade at low doses. It is concluded that the potency of reversal agents may be different for different relaxants, and that potency ratios might depend upon the end-point chosen as full neuromuscular recovery.     

Reversal of pancuronium

Moderate to deep (67-99% single twitch depression) pancuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade was antagonised with neostigmine (30 micrograms/kg, 60 micrograms/kg, or 80 micrograms/kg) in combination with glycopyrronium. Twenty-seven patients were reversed from 91%-99% twitch depression. Recovery of the first twitch of a train-of-four to 95% of control twitch took at least 20 minutes with neostigmine 30 micrograms/kg. The higher doses were significantly faster (60 micrograms/kg p less than 0.05, 80 micrograms/kg p less than 0.01) and took 15.8 and 14.8 minutes respectively. Reversal to a train of four ratio of 0.75 was not consistently achieved in under 30 minutes with any dose of neostigmine. Nineteen patients were antagonised from a 67%-80% depression of first twitch and in all but two recovery to 95% of control took under 10 minutes. To achieve a train of four ratio of 0.75 took less than 12.5 minutes except in three patients, two of whom, both given neostigmine 30 micrograms/kg, took longer than 20 minutes. Neostigmine 60 micrograms/kg produced as rapid a degree of antagonism as 80 micrograms/kg. Heart rates after reversal decreased gradually in all groups, although the decrease was initially greater in the low dose neostigmine (30 micrograms/kg) group. A fixed 5:1 ratio of neostigmine and glycopyrronium will usually antagonise a moderate (70%-80%) pancuronium block to a train of four of greater than 75% within 12.5 minutes if at least 60 micrograms/kg of neostigmine is administered. More than 30 minutes may be required for reversal whatever the dose of neostigmine, for antagonism from greater than 90% twitch depression.     

Effect of epidurally administered bupivacaine on atracurium-induced neuromuscular blockade

The effect of epidurally administered bupivacaine on duration, intensity and reversal characteristics of atracurium-induced neuromuscular blockade was studied in 30 healthy patients anaesthetized with thiopentone, fentanyl, midazolam and nitrous oxide. Fifteen patients received, in addition, epidural anaesthesia with bupivacaine. The remaining patients served as controls. The ulnar nerve was stimulated at the wrist and the evoked twitch response from the adductor pollicis was measured with a force displacement transducer. Neuromuscular blockade was induced with atracurium 0.5 mg i.v. and maintained with repeated doses of atracurium 0.15 mg/kg whenever the twitch height had recovered to 15% of the initial twitch height. After operation, the neuromuscular blockade was reversed with neostigmine when the twitch height had recovered to 15%. In the epidural group the clinical duration of neuromuscular blockade, time until first response to train-of-four (TOF) and reversal time were all significantly prolonged (P less than 0.05). Post-tetanic count (PTC) after 20 min was also significantly lower in the epidural group (P less than 0.05). It is therefore concluded that epidurally administered bupivacaine prolongs atracurium-induced neuromuscular blockade. The clinical implication of the modest prolongation is, however, limited.     

Factors predicting atracurium reversal time

BACKGROUND: To identify individual factors and combination of factors predictive of reversal time (defined as time from neostigmine administration to train-of-four (TOF) ratio 0.70) from atracurium-induced neuromuscular block, the present study tested the following variables as possible predictors of reversal time: 1) degree of block at the time of antagonism as quantified by first response to TOF or double-burst stimulation (DBS); 2) time from last supplemental dose of atracurium to administration of neostigmine (pre-reversal time); and 3) time from administration of initial atracurium dose to T1 (the magnitude of the first twitch in TOF) recovered to 10% (duration of action of the initial dose of atracurium). METHODS: The study population comprised 83 female patients, ASA physical status 1 or 2, anaesthetized with fentanyl, thiopental, halothane and nitrous oxide. Initial and supplemental doses of atracurium were 0.5 mg x kg(-1) and 0.15 mg x kg(-1), respectively. Evoked responses to TOF or DBS were recorded mechanomyographically. Neuromuscular block was antagonized with neostigmine, 0.07 mg x kg(-1), at varying time intervals (6-50 min) after the final atracurium dose. RESULTS: Multiple linear regression analyses testing T1, D1 (the magnitude of the first twitch in DBS), pre-reversal time and duration of action of the initial dose of atracurium, demonstrated that with superficial block, T1 >15%, T1 is the only significant predictor for reversal time. With moderate block, 0< T1 < or =15%, both T1 and duration of action of the initial atracurium dose are significant predictors for reversal time. With profound block, T1=0, duration of action of the initial dose and pre-reversal time are significant predictors for reversal time. CONCLUSION: 1) T1 is a more important predictor for reversal time from atracurium-induced neuromuscular block than D1; 2) predictors differ with the degree of block: with T1 > 15%, T1 is the only significant predictor; with 0< T1 < or =15%, the duration of action of the initial dose and T1 are predictors for reversal time; with T1=0, the duration of action of the initial dose and pre-reversal time predict reversal time.     

Dosage of neostigmine for reversal of rocuronium block from two levels of spontaneous recovery

Spontaneous recovery, and recovery following neostigmine 20, 35 or 50 microgram.kg-1 administered at 10 or 25% of recovery of the first twitch of the train-of-four, was assessed in 80 patients after rocuronium administration under continued isoflurane anaesthesia. In an additional 40 patients, isoflurane administration was discontinued and neostigmine 35 or 50 microgram.kg-1 was given at 10 or 25% recovery. The administration of neostigmine reduced the recovery times significantly. A neostigmine dose of 20 microgram.kg-1 resulted in slower recovery compared with the higher doses, particularly when reversal was attempted at a first twitch height of 10%. Higher doses of neostigmine given at a first twitch height of 25% resulted in rapid reversal of block [mean (SD) times of 7.0 (4.8) and 6.4 (1.9) min with the 35 and 50 microgram.kg-1 doses, respectively, for attaining a train-of-four ratio of 0.8]. Discontinuing isoflurane did not alter recovery times. The incidence of emetic symptoms did not differ between groups, including one group that received atropine instead of glycopyrronium in combination with neostigmine. We conclude that rocuronium block can be antagonised safely using a neostigmine dose of 35 microgram.kg-1, although recovery may be slightly slower if administered at a first twitch of 10% of control.     

A comparison of the neuromuscular blocking effects and reversibility of cisatracurium and atracurium

The neuromuscular blocking effects and the reversibility of cisatracurium 0.1 or 0.15 mgkg⁻¹ were compared with those of atracurium 0.5 mgkg⁻¹ during anaesthesia with propofol, nitrous oxide and isoflurane. Neuromuscular block was monitored using train-of-four stimulation while recording the mechanomyographic response of the adductor pollicis muscle. The block was either allowed to recover spontaneously or was antagonised with neostigmine 50 μgkg⁻¹ at 10% or 25% recovery of the first twitch of the train-of-four. The median times to maximum block were 2.7, 2.2 and 1.5 min following cisatracurium 0.1 and 0.15 mgkg⁻¹ and atracurium 0.5 mgkg⁻¹, respectively. After cisatracurium 0.1 mgkg⁻¹ had been given, the median time to recovery of the train-of-four ratio to 0.8 ('adequate recovery') was 74 min during spontaneous recovery, 48 min after reversal with neostigmine when the first twitch of the train-of-four had returned to 10% of control and 50 min after reversal when the first twitch of the train-of-four had returned to 25% of control. These times for cisatracurium 0.15 mgkg⁻¹ and atracurium 0.5 mgkg⁻¹ were 90, 66 and 57 min and 75, 56 and 54 min, respectively. Administration of neostigmine significantly shortened the time to adequate recovery for both drugs but there were no significant differences in the case of either neuromuscular blocking drug between the groups of patients given neostigmine at 10 or 25% recovery of the first twitch of the train-of-four.     

Neostigmine and edrophonium for reversal of pipecuronium neuromuscular blockade

Neostigmine 0.06 mg.kg-1 or edrophonium 1 mg.kg-1 were administered to two groups of 15 patients each for antagonism of pipecuronium-induced neuromuscular block at 20% spontaneous recovery of the first twitch (T1) of the train-of-four (TOF) stimulation. The mean onset of action (+/-SEM) of edrophonium (18.1 +/- 2.4 sec) was significantly more rapid (P less than 0.01) than that of neostigmine (47.6 +/- 4 sec), as were the times taken to attain a TOF ratio of 0.25 and 0.5. Nevertheless, the reversal time (time taken from the end of injection of the antagonist until TOF ratio value had reached 0.75) was significantly shorter (P less than 0.01) in the neostigmine than in the edrophonium group (499.3 +/- 62 vs 767 +/- 52 sec respectively). The TOF ratio ten minutes after reversal was greater in the neostigmine group than in the edrophonium group (P less than 0.01), 0.78 +/- 0.02 vs 0.68 +/- 0.02 min respectively. At that time, 33% (5 out of 15) and 80% (12 out of 15) patients failed to be reversed adequately (TOF ratio of 0.75) after neostigmine 0.06 mg.kg-1 and edrophonium 1 mg.kg-1, respectively. Administration of one additional dose (one-third of the initial dose) of the same antagonist resulted in adequate antagonism in the remaining five patients in the neostigmine group and in nine patients in the edrophonium group. Two such doses were required in the remaining three patients in the latter group. The mean total dose of neostigmine and edrophonium employed in this study was 0.067 +/- 0.002 and 1.3 +/- 0.05 mg.kg-1, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Comparison of recovery following rapacuronium, with and without neostigmine, and succinylcholine

The neuromuscular blocking effects of a single dose of rapacuronium 1.5 mg x kg(-1) with or without reversal with neostigmine have been examined in the present study and compared with a dose of succinylcholine 1.0 mg x kg(-1). Neuromuscular block was measured mechanomyographically using train-of-four stimulation. Complete block occurred within 1 min with both agents. Twenty-five per cent recovery of the first response of the train-of-four occurred in a median [range] time of 7.6 [5.7-11.3] min in the succinylcholine group and in 14.2 [8.8-23.6] and 15.1 [9.6-23.4] min in the rapacuronium groups with and without neostigmine reversal, respectively. Spontaneous recovery to a train-of-four ratio of 0.8 took 33.4 [20.0-79.0] min with rapacuronium but this was reduced to about 21.2 [13.9-33.7] min when neostigmine was administered at 25% recovery of first twitch of the train-of-four.