Is Laparoscopic Resection Adequate in Patients with Neuroendocrine Pancreatic Tumors?

Since the first reports with laparoscopic resection of islet cell tumors in 1996, the experience worldwide is still limited, with only short-term outcomes available. Some have suggested that a malignant tumor is a contraindication to laparoscopic resection. Aim The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and long-term outcome of the laparoscopic approach in patients with functioning, nonfunctioning, or overt malignant pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PNT). To our knowledge this is the largest single-institution series on this subject to date. Patients and methods A total of 49 consecutive patients (43 women, 6 men; mean age 58 years, range 22–83 years) underwent laparoscopic pancreatic surgery (LPS) from April 1998 to June 2007. Preoperative localization was done by computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, endoscopic ultrasonography, and Octreoscan imaging. Other than 9 PNTs localized in the head of the pancreas, all tumors were located in the left pancreas. Malignancy was diagnosed based on the presence of lymph nodes or liver metastasis. There were 33 patients with functioning tumors: 4 with gastrinomas (mean size 1.2 cm), 1 with a glucagonoma (4 cm), 3 with vipomas (3.2 cm), 2 with carcinoids (5.2 cm), 20 with sporadic insulinomas (1.4 cm), 2 with insulinoma/multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN-1) (4.4 cm), and 1 with a malignant insulinoma (13 cm). Sixteen patients had a nonfunctioning tumor (mean size 5 cm). The following techniques were performed: laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (Lap SPDP), laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy (Lap SxDP) and laparoscopic enucleation (Lap En)/laparoscopic excision (Lap E). Lymph node dissection was performed when malignancy was suspected (Strasberg′s technique). Evaluation criteria included operative and postoperative factors, pathologic data including R0 or R1 resection (the pancreatic transection margin and all transection margins on the specimen were inked). Long-term outcomes were analyzed by tumor recurrence and patient survival. Results Four cases (8.2%) were converted to open surgery. Overall, Lap SPDP, Lap SxDP, and Lap En/Lap E were performed in 15 (33.3%), 8 (17.8%), and 22 (48.9%) patients, respectively. The operative time and blood loss was significantly lower in the Lap En group compared with the other laparoscopic techniques. The group of patients with malignant tumors undergoing Lap SxDP had a longer operating time and greater blood loss compared with the other distal pancreatectomy (Lap DP) techniques. Overall, the postoperative complications were significantly higher in the Lap En group (42.8%) than in the Lap DP (Lap SPDP + Lap SxDP) group (22%). These complications were mainly pancreatic fistula: 8.7% after Lap DP and 38% after Lap En. The overall morbidity was significantly higher after Lap SPDP (26.7%) than after Lap SxDP (12.5%) owing to the occurrence of splenic complications in the Lap SPDP group without splenic vessel preservation two of seven (28.5%). The means and ranges of hospital stay after Lap SPDP, Lap SxDP, and Lap En/Lap E were 5.9 (5–14), 7.5 (5–12), and 5.5 (5–7) days, respectively (NS). Pathology examination of the specimen showed R0 resection in all patients with malignant PNT. The mean time to resumption of previous activities for patients undergoing Lap DP or Lap En was 3 weeks. There were no postoperative (30 days) or hospital deaths. Conclusions This series demonstrates that LPS is feasible and safe in benign-appearing and malignant neuroendocrine pancreatic tumors (NEPTs). The benefits of minimally invasive surgery were manifest in the short hospital stay and acceptable pancreas-related complications in high-risk patients. LPS can achieve negative tangential margins in a high percentage of patients with malignant tumors. Although surgical cure is rare in malignant NEPTs, significant long-term palliation can be achieved in a large proportion of patients with an aggressive surgical approach.     

Pancreatic Lesions in von Hippel–Lindau Disease? A Systematic Review and Meta-synthesis of the Literature

Background

von Hippel?CLindau (vHL) disease is a rare condition that leads to characteristic lesions within many different body systems. Pancreatic manifestations of vHL cover a wide spectrum of pathologies, and thus, accurate characterization and management is critical.

Methods

A comprehensive and systematic text word and MeSH search of the medical literature was performed to identify studies where information regarding the prevalence, clinical characteristics, and management recommendations could be extracted.

Results

Eleven studies were identified but 2 studies utilized the same data set. Of the 10 remaining studies, a total of 1,442 patients with vHL were available for analysis. Four hundred and twenty patients were examined for any type of pancreatic lesion, 362 for simple cysts or serous cystadenomas (SCAs), and 1,442 for neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Of the 420 assessed for any pancreatic manifestation of vHL, 252 (60%) had a pancreatic lesion identified. Simple cysts that present as the sole manifestation of pancreatic disease were common and found in 169 of 362 (47%) patients. These are usually asymptomatic and do not normally require intervention. SCAs were reported in 39 of 362 (11%) patients and followed a similar benign course; resection is acceptable in symptomatic patients. NETs were identified in 211 of 1,442 (15%) patients, and 27 of 1,442 (2%) lesions behaved malignantly. Management of NETs depends on size, doubling time, and underlying genetics. Renal cell carcinoma is a characteristic in vHL, but there were no cases of pancreatic metastases identified from the included studies. Adenocarcinomas of the pancreas are not pathogenically linked to vHL.

Conclusions

This review highlights the wide spectrum and high prevalence of pancreatic lesions in vHL. Simple cysts and SCAs are benign, but NETs require careful observation due to their malignant potential.     

Population-Level Analysis of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors 2 cm or Less in Size

Background

There is a paucity of evidence regarding incidence and predictors of survival in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) ≤2 cm in size.

Methods

Patients having undergone resection for nonfunctioning PNETs were selected from the SEER database (1988–2009) and an institutional pathology database (1996–2012). PNETs ≤2 cm were compared with PNETs >2 cm. Data were analyzed with χ ² tests, ANOVA, the Kaplan–Meier method, log rank tests, and Cox proportional hazard, and binary logistic regression.

Results

The incidence of PNETs ≤2 cm in the United States has increased by 710.4 % over the last 22 years. Rates of extrapancreatic extension, nodal metastasis, and distant metastasis in PNETs ≤2 cm in the SEER database were 17.9, 27.3, and 9.1 %, respectively. The rate of nodal metastasis in our institutional series was 5.7 %. Disease-specific survival at 5, 10, and 15 years for PNETs ≤2 cm was 91.5, 84.0, and 76.8 %. Decreased disease-specific survival was not associated with nodal metastasis, but rather with high grade [moderately differentiated, hazard ratio (HR) 37.2, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 2.7–518.8; poorly differentiated, HR 94.2, 95 % CI 4.9–1,794.4; reference, well differentiated], and minority race (Asian, HR 30.2, 95 % CI 3.1–291.7; Black, HR 60.1, 95 % CI 2.1–1,027.9; reference, White).

Conclusions

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors ≤2 cm are increasingly common, and the most significant predictors of disease-specific survival are grade and race. The SEER database excludes PNETs considered to be benign, and rates of extrapancreatic extension, nodal metastasis, and distant metastasis are overestimated. Small size, however, does not preclude malignant behavior.     

Is the New Classification of Neuroendocrine Pancreatic Tumors of Clinical Help?

A new concept of classifying neuroendocrine pancreatic tumors based on clinicopathologic patterns was summarized recently. To evaluate the clinical reliability and prognostic specificity of this classification system, 100 neuroendocrine pancreatic tumors were retrospectively categorized as “benign,”“uncertain,” and “malignant” based on tumor risk factors (size, local invasion and angioinvasion, cell atypia, metastases) and were followed for disease recurrence and progression. Altogether, 71 functioning tumors (insulinoma, gastrinoma, glucagonoma, enterochromaffin-like (ECL)oma, somatostatinoma) and 29 nonfunctioning neuroendocrine pancreatic tumors (NETs) were studied. NETs had an increased risk of malignancy (p < 0.05). Tumor size, gross invasion, and metastases correlated significantly with tumor behavior and allowed us to distinguish between “benign” and “malignant” tumors. About 89% of the tumors ≤ 20 mm were “benign,” whereas 71% > 20 mm were “malignant” (p < 0.05). In patients with “benign” and “uncertain” neuroendocrine pancreatic tumors, neither recurrence nor progression of disease was seen. About 41% of the patients with “malignant” tumors died of the disease. The 5-year estimated cumulative survival of those with “benign” and “uncertain” tumors was 100% and 52 ± 10% for those with “malignant” tumors (p < 0.05). Histomorphologic details classifying the behavior of an “uncertain” tumor are known only after initial treatment and definitive histopathologic investigation. Thus this information is of limited clinical help for treatment strategies.     

Von Hippel–Lindau disease manifesting disseminated leptomeningeal hemangioblastomatosis: surgery or medication?

We report the case of a 46-year-old man with von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease, manifesting disseminated leptomeningeal hemangioblastomatosis. The patient initially presented with a solitary hemangioblastoma in the right cerebellum. Later, he was diagnosed with VHL disease and underwent several surgical procedures in the following 14 years. But the prognosis was poor. Recently, the hemangioblastomatosis disseminated along leptomeninges involving both brain and spine. We aim to analyze the possible reason for the leptomeninges dissemination, discuss the imaging characteristics of this rare disease with ominous manifestation and propose the optimal strategy for treatment. We think the optimal treatment strategy should be surgical biopsy and surgical decompression. A long-term follow-up is inevitable. Antiangiogenic medication might be the hope for remission of this disease.     

Role of SDHAF2 and SDHD in von Hippel–Lindau Associated Pheochromocytomas

Background

Pheochromocytomas (PCCs) develop from the adrenal medulla and are often part of a hereditary syndrome such as von Hippel–Lindau (VHL) syndrome. In VHL, only about 30 % of patients with a VHL missense mutation develop PCCs. Thus, additional genetic events leading to formation of such tumors in patients with VHL syndrome are sought. SDHAF2 (previously termed SDH5) and SDHD are both located on chromosome 11q and are required for the function of mitochondrial complex II. While SDHAF2 has been shown to be mutated in patients with paragangliomas (PGLs), SDHD mutations have been found both in patients with PCCs and in patients with PGLs.

Materials and methods

Because loss of 11q is a common event in VHL-associated PCCs, we aimed to investigate whether SDHAF2 and SDHD are targets. In the present study, 41 VHL-associated PCCs were screened for mutations and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in SDHAF2 or SDHD. Promoter methylation, as well as mRNA expression of SDHAF2 and SDHD, was studied. In addition, immunohistochemistry (IHC) of SDHB, known to be a universal marker for loss of any part the SDH complex, was conducted.

Results and conclusions

LOH was found in more than 50 % of the VHL-associated PCCs, and was correlated with a significant decrease (p < 0.05) in both SDHAF2 and SDHD mRNA expression, which may be suggestive of a pathogenic role. However, while SDHB protein expression as determined by IHC in a small cohort of tumors was lower in PCCs than in the surrounding adrenal cortex, there was no obvious correlation with LOH or the level of SDHAF2/SDHD mRNA expression. In addition, the lack of mutations and promoter methylation in the investigated samples indicates that other events on chromosome 11 might be involved in the development of PCCs in association with VHL syndrome.     

Pancreatic surgery in infants with Beckwith–Wiedemann Syndrome and Hyperinsulinism

PurposeTo present our experience in the care of infants with Beckwith–Wiedemann syndrome (BWS) who required pancreatectomy for the management of severe Congenital Hyperinsulinism (HI).MethodsWe did a retrospective chart review of patients with BWS who underwent pancreatectomy between 2009 and 2012.ResultsFour patients with BWS and severe HI underwent pancreatectomy, 3 females and one male. Eight other BWS patients with HI could be managed medically. The diagnosis of BWS was established by the presence of mosaic 11p15 loss of heterozygosity and uniparental disomy in peripheral blood and/or pancreatic tissue. All patients had hypoglycemia since birth that did not respond to medical management with diazoxide or octreotide, and required glucose infusion rates of up to 30 mg/kg/min. Preoperative 18-F-DOPA PET/CT scans showed diffuse uptake of the radiotracer throughout an enlarged pancreas in three patients and a normal sized pancreas with a large area of focal uptake in the pancreatic body in one patient. None of the patients had mutations in the ABCC8 or KCNJ1 genes that are typically associated with diazoxide-resistant HI. Age at surgery was 1, 2, 4, and 12 months and the procedures were 85%, 95%, 90%, and 75% pancreatectomy, respectively, with the pancreatectomy extent tailored to HI severity. Pathologic analysis revealed marked diffuse endocrine proliferation throughout the pancreas that occupied up to 80% of the parenchyma with scattered islet cell nucleomegaly. One patient had a small pancreatoblastoma in the pancreatectomy specimen. The HI improved in all cases after the pancreatectomy, with patients being able to fast safely for more than 8 h. All patients are under close surveillance for embryonal tumors. One patient developed a hepatoblastoma at age 2.ConclusionThe pathophysiology of HI in BWS patients is likely multifactorial and is associated with a dramatic increase in pancreatic endocrine tissue. Severe cases of HI that do not respond to medical therapy improve when the mass of endocrine tissue is reduced by subtotal or near-total pancreatectomy.     

Outcomes of Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Are Combined Procedures Justified?

Efficacy and outcomes of resection for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNET) are well established; specific data on outcomes for pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), either alone or with combined procedures, are limited. A retrospective review of PDs for pNET (1998–2014) at our institution was conducted. Patients were categorized into standard PD (SPD) alone or combined PD (CPD) defined as patients undergoing concurrent vascular reconstruction or additional organ resection for curative intent. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were performed. PD for pNET was performed for 95 patients. Tumors were functional in 11 patients (9 %). Twenty-six patients (28 %) underwent CPD. The 30/90-day mortality was 1.1/5.3 % respectively and similar between SPD and CPD (p?=?0.61/p?=?0.24). Five-year overall survival after PD for pNET was 85.1/71.9 % and similar between SPD/CPD groups (p?=?0.17). Recurrence-free and overall survival for low-grade tumors was 74.7/93.9 % at 5 years compared to only 14.8/49.7 % for high-grade tumors (p?<?0.001) and not predicted by extent of resection (SPD/CPD, respectively). PD with or without concurrent resection provides an acceptable, perioperative and long-term oncologic, outcome for pNET. CPD is justified treatment modality, particularly for patients with low-grade tumors. The need for combinatorial procedures during PD is not contraindication alone for otherwise resectable patients with pNET.     

Conservative management of endolymphatic sac tumors in von Hippel–Lindau disease: case report

In endolymphatic sac tumors associated with von Hippel–Lindau disease, early detection and surgery have been warranted to avoid associated neurological morbidity. However, in lately discovered tumors, hearing preserving surgery is often impossible and timing of surgical resection is difficult to define. We report two cases of tumors revealed by a sudden and profound hearing loss and managed conservatively for more than 15 years without worsening of the neurological symptoms associated with the endolymphatic sac tumor. Tumor size remained stable for the first patient and a stuttering growth pattern was observed for the second patient. Initial observation may be considered a not unreasonable management paradigm in these cases.     

Von Hippel–Lindau and myotonic dystrophy of Steinert along with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor and renal clear cell carcinomal neoplasm: Case report and review of the literature

INTRODUCTIONMyotonic dystrophy of Steinert, DM1, is the most common adult muscular dystrophy and generally is not associated to development on multiple site neoplasm. Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease is a dominantly inherited familial cancer syndrome that is associated to tumors such as hemangioblastoma of the retina or central nervous system, clear-cell renal carcinoma (RCC) and endocrine tumors, most commonly pheochromocytoma and non-secretory pancreatic islet cell cancers. No data exist in literature describing the coexistence of both DM1 and VHL.PRESENTATION OF CASEHerein we report a case of renal and pancreatic neoplasm in a young adult female affected by DM1 and VHL simultaneously.DISCUSSIONDM1 is due to an unstable trinucleotide (CTG) expansion in the 30 antranslated region of the dystrophia myotonica-protein kinase (DMPK) gene, located on chromosome 19q13.3. Several molecular mechanisms thought to be determining the classical DM phenotype have been shown. VHL disease is characterized by marked phenotypic variability and the most common tumors are hemangioblastomas of the retina or central nervous system, clear-cell renal carcinoma (RCC) and endocrine tumors, most commonly pheochromocytoma and non-secretory pancreatic islet cell cancers. The pancreatic manifestations seen in patients with VHL disease are divided into 2 categories: pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PNET) as solid tumors, and cystic lesions, including a simple cyst and serous cystadenoma. The surgical approach for these cistic lesions is to consider as golden standard. Blansfield has proposed 3 criteria to predict metastatic disease of PNET in patients with VHL disease: (1) tumor size greater than or equal to 3 cm; (2) presence of a mutation in exon 3; and (3) tumor doubling time less than 500 d. If the patient has none of these criteria the patient could be followed with physical examination and radiological surveillance on a 2/3 years base.⁴ If the patient has 1 criterion, the patient should be followed more closely every 6 months to 1 year. If the patient has 2 or 3 criteria, the patient should be considered for surgery given the high risk of future malignancy. Our patient owned only one criterion but in presence of a second malignant tumor. Our hypothesis for this rare findings is that both DM and VHL might be derived from genetic aberration and these might be linked to a major cancer susceptibility. As far as we know this is the first confirmed case of RCC and neuroendocrine pancreatic cancer occurring concurrently with VHL and, at the same time, DM1. According to this case report and the literature data a VHL should be ruled out in the presence of RCC presenting along with pancreatic cysts/tumor.CONCLUSIONAs far as we know this is the first confirmed case of RCC and neuroendocrine pancreatic cancer occurring concurrently with VHL and, at the same time, DM1. Our hypothesis for the unusual findings is that both DM and VHL derived from genetic aberration and these are linked to a major cancer susceptibility.     

Genetic evaluation of von Hippel–Lindau disease for early diagnosis and improved prognosis

von Hippel-Lindau disease (VHL) is a rare autosomal-dominant disorder in which affected individuals develop tumors in a number of locations. It occurs at a frequency of one per 36,000 population. Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains the leading cause of mortality in patients with clear cell RCC arising from mutations in the VHL tumor suppressor. RCC is the presenting feature in only 10% of VHL patients. VHL patients can present with a number of other renal lesions, such as hemangiomas and benign adenomas, in addition to simple cysts and RCC. We have investigated VHL gene mutations in familial RCC. The study cohort consisted of four patients with synchronous VHL and RCC and 31 kindreds. Analysis of the chromosomes was performed by the Moorehead method. Although none of the kindreds investigated had clinical evidence of VHL disease, 22 were found to have a VHL gene mutation consisting of deletions on the short arm of chromosomes 3, 17, and 19. Detailed clinical examination of the 22 kindreds with a VHL mutation revealed cerebellar hemangioblastoma (three kindreds), meningioma (two) and renal cell carcinoma (five). No VHL gene mutation was detected in nine kindreds. The prevalence of VHL gene mutations was 70.9% in the familial RCC kindreds. As a result of this study, the kindreds of patients with synchronous VHL and RCC have undergone molecular genetic testing and should be investigated for associated disorders.     

Hereditary renal cell carcinoma associated with von Hippel–Lindau disease: a description of a Nova Scotia cohort

Background

von Hippel–Lindau (VHL) disease is an autosomal dominant condition characterized by the development of benign and malignant tumours, including cases of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Early detection of RCC through routine surveillance can lead to decreased morbidity and mortality. Data on the number of patients in Nova Scotia (NS) who have VHL disease, disease manifestations and the frequency and mode of the surveillance have not previously been collected or reported. This project was designed to obtain that information.

Methods

The number and management of patients with VHL disease was determined by multiple sources: the Maritime Medical Genetics Service, patient charts, and pathology, radiology and laboratory data. The actual surveillance being performed was compared with that recommended in the literature.

Results

Twenty-one patients from 11 families in NS were identified. Manifestations included cases of RCC (31.6%), central nervous system (CNS) hemangioblastoma (73.7%), retinal hemangioma (47.4%), renal cyst (47.4%) and pheochromocytoma (10.5%). Of the 6 patients with RCC, 4 had bilateral tumours, 2 required kidney transplants and 1 developed metastatic disease. Routine surveillance was being done for the CNS in 62.5% of patients, retina in 47.4%, abdomen in 43.8% and urine catecholamines in only 10.5%. Only 1 of the 6 patients who developed RCC was undergoing routine abdominal imaging. Surveillance investigations were ordered by a number of different specialists.

Conclusion

Patients with VHL disease in NS have a number of manifestations associated with their disease, including RCC, in a similar frequency to that reported in the literature. The surveillance of these patients is suboptimal in frequency and coordination. von Hippel–Lindau disease is a complex condition that requires a coordinated approach to care to ensure proper surveillance and treatment. Our study highlights current deficiencies and offers an enormous opportunity for improvement.     

Chemoprevention with Somatuline© Delays the Progression of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms in a Mouse Model of Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1 (MEN1)

World Journal of Surgery - Long-acting synthetic somatostatin analogues (SSA) are an essential part of the treatment of neuroendocrine neoplasms. We evaluated the chemopreventive effects of a...     

Nonfunctional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors <2 cm on Preoperative Imaging are Associated with a Low Incidence of Nodal Metastasis and an Excellent Overall Survival

Background

The optimal surgical management of small nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-PNETs) remains controversial. We sought to identify (1) clinicopathologic factors associated with survival in NF-PNETs and (2) preoperative tumor characteristics that can be used to determine which lesions require resection and lymph node (LN) harvest.

Methods

The records of all 116 patients who underwent resection for NF-PNETs between 1989 and 2012 were reviewed retrospectively. Preoperative factors, operative data, pathology, surgical morbidity, and survival were analyzed.

Results

The overall 5- and 10-year survival rates were 83.9 and 72.8 %, respectively. Negative LNs (p?=?0.005), G1 or G2 histology (p?=?0.033), and age <60 years (p?=?0.002) correlated with better survival on multivariate analysis. The 10-year survival rate was 86.6 % for LN-negative patients (n?=?73) and 34.1 % for LN-positive patients (n?=?32). Tumor size ≥2 cm on preoperative imaging predicted nodal positivity with a sensitivity of 93.8 %. Positive LNs were found in 38.5 % of tumors ≥2 cm compared to only 7.4 % of tumors <2 cm.

Conclusions

LN status, a marker of systemic disease, was a highly significant predictor of survival in this series. Tumor size on preoperative imaging was predictive of nodal disease. Thus, it is reasonable to consider parenchyma-sparing resection or even close observation for NF-PNETs <2 cm.