Long-term prognosis after normal dobutamine stress echocardiography

Patients with normal dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) were shown to have a favorable outcome at an intermediate-term follow-up. However, there are scarce data regarding long-term survival after normal DSE. This study sought to assess the long-term outcome after normal DSE. We studied 401 patients (age 62 +/- 10 years, 264 men) who had a normal echocardiogram at rest and with high-dose dobutamine stress. End points during a mean follow-up of 5 +/- 1.7 years (minimum 3.5) were all-cause mortality and hard cardiac events (cardiac death and nonfatal myocardial infarction). During follow-up, 45 patients (11%) died due to various causes (cardiac death in 10 patients). Thirteen patients had nonfatal myocardial infarction (a total of 23 hard cardiac events). The annual mortality rate was 2% in the first 3 years and 2.4% between the fourth and sixth years. The annual hard cardiac event rate was 0.8% in the first 3 years and 1.7% between the fourth and sixth years. Predictors of mortality in a multivariate analysis model were advanced age (hazard ratio 1.2, 95% confidence interval CI 1.1 to 1.4) and higher heart rate at rest (hazard ratio 0.92, 95% confidence interval 0.85 to 0.99). Patients with normal DSE had excellent outcomes during the 3 years after the study. The cardiac event rate was higher between the fourth and sixth year; therefore, it may be useful to repeat the study after 3 years to reassess risk status.     

Influence of gender and race on hemodynamic response to dobutamine during dobutamine stress echocardiography

This study sought to determine the influence of gender and/or race on the hemodynamic response to dobutamine during dobutamine stress echocardiography. Blood pressure response patterns differed by gender and race, and completion of testing was often limited because of adverse events, namely, hypertension. Gender and racial differences in blood pressure response merit consideration as potential contributors to the suboptimal response in dobutamine stress testing.     

Long-term prognosis in women with normal dobutamine stress echocardiography

Although the long-term prognosis for patients with a normal dobutamine stress echocardiographic result is good, most studies have focused on men. We assessed the long-term cardiac prognosis for women by reviewing the cases of 100 women who underwent dobutamine stress echocardiography for suspected coronary artery disease and found that women with a normal result have an excellent long-term cardiac prognosis.     

Real-time three-dimensional dobutamine stress echocardiography in assessment stress echocardiography in assessment of ischemia: comparison with two-dimensional dobutamine stress echocardiography

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to test the feasibility and efficacy of using real-time three-dimensional echocardiography (RT-3D) to detect ischemia during dobutamine-induced stress (DSE) and compares the results with conventional two-dimensional echocardiography (2D). BACKGROUND: Real-time three-dimensional echocardiography, a novel imaging technique, offers rapid acquisition with multiple simultaneous views of the left ventricle (LV). These features make it attractive for application during stress. METHODS: Of 279 consecutive patients screened for image quality by 2D, 253 patients with adequate images underwent RT-3D and 2D within 30 s of each other at baseline and at peak DSE. RESULTS: Real-time three-dimensional echocardiography and 2D showed good concordance in detection of abnormal LV wall motion at baseline (84%: Kappa = 0.59) and at peak DSE (88.9%: Kappa = 0.72). Left ventricular wall motion scores were similar at baseline and peak DSE using both techniques. Interobserver agreements for detection of ischemia at peak DSE were superior for RT-3D, 92.7% compared with 84.6% for 2D (p < 0.05). Mean scanning time at peak stress by RT-3D in 50 randomly selected patients was shorter, 27.4 +/- 10.7 s compared with 62.4 +/- 20.1 s by 2D (p < 0.0001). In 90 patients with coronary angiograms, RT-3D had a sensitivity of 87.9% in the detection of coronary artery disease (CAD) compared with 79.3% by 2D. CONCLUSIONS: Real-time three-dimensional dobutamine stress echocardiography is feasible and sensitive in the detection of CAD. The procedure offers shorter scanning time, superior interobserver agreements and unique new views of the LV.     

Effects of gender on prognosis of patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease undergoing contrast-enhanced dobutamine stress echocardiography.

BACKGROUND: Gender differences in the predictors of outcome among patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing contrast-enhanced dobutamine stress echocardiography (CE-DSE) have not been completely determined. METHODS AND RESULTS: Follow-up (30+/-17 months) data for 581 men and 309 women with known or suspected CAD who underwent CE-DSE (mean age: 66 years) were obtained. Hard cardiac events included cardiac death and nonfatal myocardial infarction. Total cardiac events included hard cardiac events, unstable angina, congestive heart failure, and late revascularization (>3 months). Cardiac events occurred in 123 male and 50 female patients. Positive results for CE-DSE were associated with worse prognosis in both men and women (2-year total event free rate: 73.5% vs 88.2% in men, p<0.0001, 80.3% vs 91.3% in women, p<0.01). Addition of CE-DSE results, including abnormal left ventricular end-systolic volume response and left ventricular ejection fraction at peak stress <50%, to the clinical and rest echocardiography model provided incremental information for predicting total cardiac events (increase in chi-square value for the model from 60 to 72, p<0.001) in men and (increase in chi-square value for the model from 17 to 32, p<0.001) in women. CONCLUSIONS: CE-DSE provides incremental information for predicting future cardiac events in both men and women.     

Outcomes after normal dobutamine stress echocardiography and predictors of adverse events: long-term follow-up of 3014 patients.

AIMS: Normal exercise echocardiography predicts a good prognosis. Dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) is generally reserved for patients with comorbidities which preclude exercise testing. We evaluated predictors of adverse events after normal DSE. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 3014 patients (1200 males, 68+/-12 years) with normal DSE, defined as the absence of wall motion abnormality at rest or with stress. During median follow-up of 6.3 years, all-cause mortality and cardiac events, defined as myocardial infarction and coronary revascularization, occurred in 920 (31%) and 231 (7.7%) patients, respectively. Survival and cardiac event-free probabilities were 95 and 98% at 1 year, 78 and 93% at 5 years, and 56 and 89% at 10 years, respectively. Age, diabetes mellitus, and failure to achieve 85% age-predicted maximal heart rate were independent predictors of mortality and cardiac events. Patients with all three of these characteristics had a 13% probability of cardiac events within the first year and higher risk throughout follow-up. CONCLUSION: Prognosis after normal DSE is not necessarily benign, but depends on patient and stress test characteristics. Careful evaluation, using clinical and stress data, is required to identify patients with normal DSE who are at increased risk of adverse outcomes during long-term follow-up.     

The clinical impact of dynamic intraventricular obstruction during dobutamine stress echocardiography.

We selected 73 consecutive patients without myocardial-infarction, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy or hypertension complaining of effort chest discomfort/dyspnoea, and/or reporting exercise ischaemic ECG changes, and submitted them to simultaneous dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) and 99mTc tetrofosmin SPECT (T SPECT) and to coronary angiography to evaluate the clinical impact of intraventricular obstruction (IVO) during dobutamine infusion. Sixteen patients (22%, 7 males, mean age+/-SD 63+/-8 years, group 1) developed IVO (mean CW Doppler velocity+/-SD: 3.8+/-1.0 m/s) and 57 (41 males, mean age+/-SD 63+/-10 years, group 2) did not. The two groups had similar incidence of angina and ischaemic ECG changes at exercise tolerance test. DSE did not demonstrate wall motion abnormalities in any group 1 patient while T SPECT showed a perfusion defect in the only one with coronary artery disease (CAD). DSE reproduced symptoms in a higher percentage of patients with than without IVO, while there was no statistical difference in the reproduction of ischaemic ECG changes, despite CAD prevalence was much lower in group 1. Group 1 patients remained asymptomatic on beta-blockers at 12-month follow-up. Dobutamine-induced IVO, by reproducing symptoms, suggests that IVO plays a role in the clinical setting in patients without CAD complaining of unexplained reduced effort tolerance who should undergo DSE.     

Effect of dobutamine stress echocardiography on mitral regurgitation

Objectives. This study was performed to examine the effect of dobutamine stress echocardiography on mitral regurgitation and to test the hypothesis that mitral regurgitation will increase in patients with an ischemic response.Background. New or worsening mitral regurgitation during stress testing has been proposed as a marker of ischemia. However, it is unclear whether ischemia induced by dobutamine is associated with mitral regurgitation because the hemodynamic effects of dobutamine may vary with regard to mitral regurgitation, depending on left ventricular function and maximal dose attained.Methods. Dobutamine stress echocardiography was performed in 102 consecutive patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease. Color flow Doppler was used to determine the presence and change in mitral regurgitation at baseline and peak dobutamine infusion (up to 40 μg/kg body weight per min). The mitral regurgitation color flow Doppler area was semiquantitatively graded as mild (<4 cm²), moderate (4 to 8 cm²) or severe (>8 cm²). Patients were assigned to ischemic and nonischemic groups according to the dobutamine stress echocardiographic results.Results. The two groups achieved the same maximal dose and demonstrated similar blood pressure and heart rate responses to dobutamine infusion. Only two patients developed new mitral regurgitation during dobutamine infusion, and both had a normal dobutamine echocardiographic result. More patients without ischemia had no mitral regurgitation compared with patients with ischemia. There was an insufficient number of patients with coronary angiographic data to determine the effects of mitral regurgitation on the sensitivity and specificity of dobutamine stress echocardiography. Of 23 patients with a rest ejection fraction <50%, 61% had an improvement in mitral regurgitation grade compared with 25% of patients with a rest ejection fraction ≥50% (p < 0.02).Conclusions. These data indicate that although dobutamine infusion often improves mitral regurgitation in patients with left ventricular dysfunction during stress echocardiography, it does not induce or worsen mitral regurgitation in those who demonstrate an ischemic response. Future studies are necessary, with larger numbers of patients, to determine the effects of mitral regurgitation on the sensitivity and specificity of dobutamine stress echocardiography.     

Recent advances in dobutamine stress echocardiography

Dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) is a reliable cardiac risk stratifier that has widespread applicability because of its clinical accuracy and cost effectiveness. Dobutamine has positive inotropic and chronotropic effects and is commonly used in patients who cannot exercise or achieve an adequate heart rate response with exercise. Recently available long-term results from several independent clinical trials, combined with enhancements in image quality, have improved the ability to detect significant coronary artery disease and determine myocardial viability. Dobutamine stress echocardiography has an excellent safety profile with clinical results superior to regular exercise electrocardiography and comparable with exercise echocardiography and radionucleotide perfusion stress imaging. Low-dose dobutamine response can accurately predict dysfunctional yet viable myocardial regions that may improve with revascularization. Clinical studies are now available refining the common use of DSE preoperatively in female patients with valvular disease, as well as in the emergency department. Dobutamine stress echocardiography does have some limitations in discriminating particular regions of ischemia when multiple ventricular segments are involved and when the imaging is suboptimal. It can be applied using minimal additional resources in an otherwise functioning echocardiography laboratory and, with appropriate training, can result in clinical results comparable with those of large-scale multicenter trials. Ongoing improvements in technology and the development of new reagents such as myocardial contrast agents hold promise for further advancement in the near future.     

Myocardial viability after primary coronary angioplasty: low-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography versus myocardial contrast echocardiography.

BACKGROUND: Successful reperfusion therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) improves survival. Indeed, after AMI myocardial dysfunction may be reversible (hibernating or stunned myocardium). Low-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography (LDDSE) provides us with the possibility of evaluating viable myocardial segments, while myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) allows the study of the microcirculation in the same myocardial areas. The aim of our study was to compare LDDSE and MCE, in the prediction of the recovery of segments in patients with AMI who were submitted to primary coronary angioplasty (PTCA). METHODS: We studied 14 patients with AMI. Both LDDSE and MCE with Levovist were performed after primary PTCA. The viability gold standard was a recovery of contractility detected at echocardiography 2 months later. RESULTS: For LDDSE, the sensitivity was 91%, the specificity 71% and the positive and negative predictive values were 93 and 64% respectively. For MCE, the sensitivity was 94%, the specificity 44%, the positive predictive value 89%, and the negative predictive value 59%. Two tests agreed in 81% of the cases. Stress echocardiography and contrast echocardiography agreed in 81% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: LDDSE has a very good positive accuracy, it has an acceptable negative predictive value and is relatively cheap. On the other hand, MCE has a good positive accuracy, but a low negative accuracy and carries a high cost. The integration of these two tests, which are too expensive in clinical practice, could improve our comprehension of the post-PTCA pathophysiology.     

Atrial fibrillation in dobutamine stress echocardiography

OBJECTIVES: To describe the incidence of atrial fibrillation induced by dobutamine stress echocardiography and characterize patients at risk of developing atrial fibrillation, by constructing a simple validated risk score index. DESIGN: An observational study using prospectively collected data. METHODS: 3800 consecutive patients in sinus rhythm undergoing dobutamine stress echocardiography were randomly divided to a case (2/3) and test group (1/3). Associations of predetermined demographic, clinical, electrocardiographic and echocardiographic variables were calculated in patients with and without atrial fibrillation induced by dobutamine stress echocardiography in the case group. Logistic regression analysis determined significant independent risk predictors, a scoring index was constructed and validated on the test group. RESULTS: There was a 2% incidence of dobutamine stress echocardiography-induced atrial fibrillation in the study population. Risk predictors of atrial fibrillation included: a history of atrial fibrillation (2 points), increased left atrial diameter, right bundle branch block, decreased rest heart rate and hypertension (1 point each). The case subgroup low-risk patients (score 0-2) had a 1% risk, moderate-risk patients (score 3) a 2.7% and high-risk patients (score 4-6) a 14.5% risk of developing atrial fibrillation during dobutamine stress echocardiography. The rates in the test subgroup were 1%, 3.8% and 15.3%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Atrial fibrillation during dobutamine stress echocardiography is not common, the risk of developing atrial fibrillation during dobutamine stress echocardiography can be predicted by using a simple risk score system comprised of clinical, electrocardiographic and rest echocardiographic variables, which may be of help when planning a dobutamine stress echocardiography test in selected cases.     

Cardiac rupture during contrast-enhanced dobutamine stress echocardiography

Dobutamine stress echocardiography is widely used after myocardial infarction. This technique is safe and severe adverse reactions are uncommon. We report one case of cardiac rupture during contrast-enhanced dobutamine stress echocardiography.     

Risk stratification after acute myocardial infarction: limitations of dobutamine stress echocardiography in females]

BACKGROUND: Dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) is an imaging test widely used for risk stratification of patients after acute myocardial infarction. METHODS: We evaluated the sensitivity of DSE with respect to the gender and the stenotic coronary artery in patients who survived a myocardial infarction and with angiographic evidence of single-vessel coronary artery disease. RESULTS: The sensitivity of DSE was generally low. In particular, it was significantly lower in the presence of stenosis of the left circumflex and right coronary arteries with respect to the left anterior descending coronary artery. In females it was lower, especially when the stenosis involved the right coronary and left circumflex arteries. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that in female gender the use of other imaging tests and particularly of coronarography should be strongly recommended for risk stratification after acute myocardial infarction.     

Rupture of papillary muscle during dobutamine stress echocardiography

A 72-year-old man presented with an acute myocardial infarction, he did not receive any reperfusion therapy because he presented as a non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (MI). A dobutamine stress echocardiography was done five days after. A partial rupture of the posterior papillary muscle occurred during the stress test. The patient developed cardiogenic shock; he improved after medical management, and mitral repair was done a few days after.