Bevacizumab in combination with fluorouracil and leucovorin: an active regimen for first-line metastatic colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: In a phase III trial, combining bevacizumab (BV)--a recombinant, humanized, monoclonal antibody targeting vascular endothelial growth factor--with irinotecan, bolus fluorouracil (FU), and leucovorin (LV; IFL) increased survival compared with IFL alone in first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). Results for the parent study of IFL/BV versus IFL/placebo are reported elsewhere. Here, we describe efficacy and safety results for the third patient cohort in this trial, who received BV combined with FU/LV, and compare them with results for concurrently enrolled patients who received IFL. METHODS: Patients (N = 923) were randomly assigned to receive IFL/placebo (control), IFL/BV, or FU/LV/BV. Bevacizumab (Avastin; Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, CA) 5 mg/kg was administered intravenously every 2 weeks. Before an interim analysis confirmed acceptable safety for IFL/BV, 313 patients were concurrently randomly assigned to these three arms; after this analysis, the FU/LV/BV arm was discontinued. RESULTS: Median overall survivals were 18.3 and 15.1 months with FU/LV/BV (n = 110) and IFL/placebo (n = 100), respectively. Median progression-free survivals were 8.8 and 6.8 months, respectively. Overall response rates were 40.0% and 37.0%, and median response durations were 8.5 and 7.2 months, respectively. Adverse events consistent with those expected from FU/leucovorin- or IFL-based regimens were seen, as were modest increases in hypertension and bleeding in the bevacizumab arm, which were generally easily managed. CONCLUSION: The FU/LV/BV regimen seems as effective as IFL and has an acceptable safety profile. FU/LV/BV is an active alternative treatment regimen for patients with previously untreated metastatic CRC.     

Combined analysis of efficacy: the addition of bevacizumab to fluorouracil/leucovorin improves survival for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: Bevacizumab (Avastin; Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, CA), a recombinant, humanized anti-vascular endothelial growth factor monoclonal antibody that inhibits tumor angiogenesis, has demonstrated survival benefit in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer when combined with irinotecan/fluorouracil (FU)/leucovorin (LV; IFL). Three randomized clinical studies have evaluated bevacizumab in combination with FU/LV alone. A combined analysis of raw data from these studies was performed to better assess the efficacy of bevacizumab with FU/LV. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The analysis used primary efficacy data from three independent studies, including 241 patients in a combined control group receiving either FU/LV or IFL and 249 patients receiving FU/LV/bevacizumab (5 mg/kg once every 2 weeks). The efficacy data included response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival. RESULTS: The median duration of survival was 17.9 months in the FU/LV/bevacizumab group, compared with 14.6 months in the combined control group, corresponding to a hazard ratio for death of 0.74 (P = .008). The median duration of progression-free survival was 8.8 months in the FU/LV/bevacizumab group, compared with 5.6 months in the combined control group, corresponding to a hazard ratio for disease progression of 0.63 (P < or = .0001). The addition of bevacizumab also improved the response rate (34.1% v 24.5%; P = .019). CONCLUSION: The addition of bevacizumab to FU/LV provides a statistically significant and clinically relevant benefit to patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer.     

Randomized phase III trial in elderly patients comparing LV5FU2 with or without irinotecan for first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (FFCD 2001–02)

BackgroundMetastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) frequently occurs in elderly patients. However, data from a geriatric tailored randomized trial about tolerance to and the efficacy of doublet chemotherapy (CT) with irinotecan in the elderly are lacking. The benefit of first-line CT intensification remains an issue in elderly patients.Patients and methodsElderly patients (75+) with previously untreated mCRC were randomly assigned in a 2 × 2 factorial design (four arms) to receive 5-FU (5-fluorouracil)-based CT, either alone (FU: LV5FU2 or simplified LV5FU2) or in combination with irinotecan [IRI: LV5FU2–irinotecan or simplified LV5FU2–irinotecan (FOLFIRI)]. The CLASSIC arm was defined as LV5FU2 or LV5FU2–irinotecan and the SIMPLIFIED arm as simplified LV5FU2 or FOLFIRI. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points were overall survival (OS), safety and objective response rate (ORR).ResultsFrom June 2003 to May 2010, 71 patients were randomly assigned to LV5FU2, 71 to simplified LV5FU2, 70 to LV5FU2–irinotecan and 70 to FOLFIRI. The median age was 80 years (range 75–92 years). No significant difference was observed for the median PFS: FU 5.2 months versus IRI 7.3 months, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.84 (0.66–1.07), P = 0.15 and CLASSIC 6.5 months versus SIMPLIFIED 6.0 months, HR = 0.85 (0.67–1.09), P = 0.19. The ORR was superior in IRI (P = 0.0003): FU 21.1% versus IRI 41.7% and in CLASSIC (P = 0.04): CLASSIC 37.1% versus SIMPLIFIED 25.6%. Median OS was 14.2 months in FU versus 13.3 months in IRI, HR = 0.96 (0.75–1.24) and 15.2 months in CLASSIC versus 11.4 months in SIMPLIFIED, HR = 0.71 (0.55–0.92). More patients presented grade 3–4 toxicities in IRI (52.2% versus 76.3%).ConclusionIn this elderly population, adding irinotecan to an infusional 5-FU-based CT did not significantly increase either PFS or OS. Classic LV5FU2 was associated with an improved OS compared with simplified LV5FU2.Clinicaltrials.govNCT00303771.     

Bevacizumab in combination with irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFIRI) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who were previously treated with oxaliplatin-containing regimens: a multicenter observational cohort study (TCTG 2nd-BV study)

The efficacy of bevacizumab combined with infusional 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) plus irinotecan (FOLFIRI) as the second-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has not been fully clarified, although bevacizumab combined with infusional 5-FU/LV plus oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) in the second-line setting has demonstrated a survival benefit. We investigated the efficacy of bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI in mCRC patients who failed oxaliplatin-containing regimens without bevacizumab. Patients who received bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI or bevacizumab plus FOLFOX as second-line chemotherapy between July 2007 and March 2008 were registered (trial registration: UMIN000001547). Patient background data and progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), response, and bevacizumab-related adverse events were prospectively collected every 6?months. A total of 195 patients were enrolled from 26 institutions. Among them, 115 patients received bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI after failure of oxaliplatin and fluoropyrimidine (FOLFIRI+BV after OX/FU group), and 45 patients received bevacizumab plus FOLFOX after failure of irinotecan and fluoropyrimidine (FOLFOX+BV after IRI/FU group). Median PFS was 8.3?months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.7-9.9) for the FOLFIRI+BV after OX/FU group and 7.8?months (95% CI, 5.8-9.7) for the FOLFOX+BV after IRI/FU group. Median OS was 21.6?months (95% CI, 17.6-25.6) and 16.5?months (95% CI, 11.8-21.2), respectively. Overall response rates were 25 and 29%, respectively. The most common grade ≥3 bevacizumab-related adverse events were hypertension (5.0%) and bleeding (3.8%). FOLFIRI+BV after OX/FU showed comparable efficacy to FOLFOX+BV after IRI/FU.     

Irinotecan in the treatment of colorectal cancer

Irinotecan, a water-soluble, semisynthetic derivative of camptothecin, is a key component of first- and second-line treatment regimens for metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). In the first-line treatment of metastatic CRC, the results of two prospective, multicenter phase III trials have shown that the combination of irinotecan with bolus or infusional 5-fluorouracil (5FU)/leucovorin (LV) can significantly prolong survival compared with 5FU/LV alone, with a manageable side effects profile. In addition, irinotecan-based regimens, with or without oxaliplatin, may improve resectability of metastases and further increase patient survival. Studies of irinotecan in the first-line setting in combination with newer agents, such as bevacizumab, have shown impressive overall survival. In the second-line setting, irinotecan has demonstrated efficacy superior to that of best supportive care. Initial studies of irinotecan plus bolus 5FU/LV, and the preliminary results from trials of irinotecan plus infusional 5FU/LV in the adjuvant setting, have been disappointing; however, for the largest trial, the Pan-European Trial in Adjuvant Colon Cancer, results with sufficient follow-up are pending. Irinotecan has an acceptable tolerability profile and is not associated with cumulative toxicities in patients with metastatic CRC; regimens containing irinotecan extend treatment duration and improve survival. New regimens and adjunctive therapies are being explored to reduce the incidence of common complications of irinotecan treatment, such as diarrhea and neutropenia.     

Randomized multicenter phase II trial of bolus plus infusional fluorouracil/leucovorin compared with fluorouracil/leucovorin plus oxaliplatin as third-line treatment of patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: The addition of oxaliplatin to fluorouracil (FU) and leucovorin (LV) improves the outcome of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). This multicenter study evaluated FU/LV with or without oxaliplatin in patients with metastatic CRC after disease progression on sequential fluoropyrimidine and irinotecan. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred fourteen patients were randomly assigned to receive LV 200 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) and FU 400 mg/m2 IV bolus, followed by FU 600 mg/m2 IV over 22 hours on days 1 and 2, every 2 weeks (LV5FU2); or LV and FU as described, plus oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 IV over 2 hours on day 1 of the schedule (FOLFOX4). The primary end point was overall response. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar in the two treatment arms. Objective response (complete + partial) rates for LV5FU2 versus FOLFOX4 were 2% v 13% (P = .0027), respectively. Median time to disease progression was 2.4 v 4.8 months (P < .0001), and median survival was 11.4 v 9.9 months (P = .20) for LV5FU2 and FOLFOX4, respectively. Among the 72 patients who crossed over from LV5FU2 to FOLFOX4, 6% responded. Symptomatic improvement was significantly better for patients in the FOLFOX4 arm (32% v 18% for LV5FU2, P = .05). Grade 3/4 toxicities for LV5FU2 and FOLFOX4 were neutropenia (13% and 42%, respectively), diarrhea (6% and 16%, respectively), and overall neuropathy (0% and 6%, respectively). CONCLUSION: In patients with metastatic CRC, the FOLFOX4 regimen was superior to LV5FU2 with a higher response rate and time to disease progression. FOLFOX4 is an effective regimen even after disease progression on two previous chemotherapy regimens with fluoropyrimidines and irinotecan.     

FOLFIRI followed by FOLFOX6 or the reverse sequence in advanced colorectal cancer: a randomized GERCOR study.

PURPOSE: In metastatic colorectal cancer, phase III studies have demonstrated the superiority of fluorouracil (FU) with leucovorin (LV) in combination with irinotecan or oxaliplatin over FU + LV alone. This phase III study investigated two sequences: folinic acid, FU, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) followed by folinic acid, FU, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX6; arm A), and FOLFOX6 followed by FOLFIRI (arm B). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Previously untreated patients with assessable disease were randomly assigned to receive a 2-hour infusion of l-LV 200 mg/m(2) or dl-LV 400 mg/m(2) followed by a FU bolus 400 mg/m(2) and 46-hour infusion 2,400 to 3,000 mg/m(2) every 46 hours every 2 weeks, either with irinotecan 180 mg/m(2) or with oxaliplatin 100 mg/m(2) as a 2-hour infusion on day 1. At progression, irinotecan was replaced by oxaliplatin (arm A), or oxaliplatin by irinotecan (arm B). RESULT: Median survival was 21.5 months in 109 patients allocated to FOLFIRI then FOLFOX6 versus 20.6 months in 111 patients allocated to FOLFOX6 then FOLFIRI (P =.99). Median second progression-free survival (PFS) was 14.2 months in arm A versus 10.9 in arm B (P =.64). In first-line therapy, FOLFIRI achieved 56% response rate (RR) and 8.5 months median PFS, versus FOLFOX6 which achieved 54% RR and 8.0 months median PFS (P =.26). Second-line FOLFIRI achieved 4% RR and 2.5 months median PFS, versus FOLFOX6 which achieved 15% RR and 4.2 months PFS. In first-line therapy, National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria grade 3/4 mucositis, nausea/vomiting, and grade 2 alopecia were more frequent with FOLFIRI, and grade 3/4 neutropenia and neurosensory toxicity were more frequent with FOLFOX6. CONCLUSION: Both sequences achieved a prolonged survival and similar efficacy. The toxicity profiles were different.     

Advances in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer

The overall 5-year survival rate for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) is less than 10%. Median survival with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV) therapy is approximately 12 months. Recent additions to the chemotherapy armamentarium for this disease have begun to prolong median survival times. In trials in which patients are exposed to all three approved chemotherapy agents, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and 5-FU/LV, or capecitabine during the course of their disease, median survival has reached 20 months. The addition of oxaliplatin and irinotecan to 5-FU/LV regimens has also led to the maintenance of quality of life for longer intervals than were traditionally observed with 5-FU/LV alone. Current standard first-line regimens for metastatic CRC are FOLFOX (infusional 5-FU/LV with oxaliplatin) and FOLFIRI (infusional 5-FU/LV with irinotecan). The addition of bevacizumab to a two-drug regimen (irinotecan with 5-FU/LV) prolongs median survival to 20 months, with a modest amount of additional toxicity. Improvements in this median survival have not yet been realized with modifications to the current standard regimens; however, the oral agent capecitabine appears to be a reasonable substitute for infusional 5-FU/LV in combination regimens or as a single agent, with the advantage of reducing the inconvenience of the long infusion time. Ongoing investigations will identify a place for capecitabine, epidermal growth factor inhibitors, and new cytotoxics in the treatment of metastatic CRC.     

Commentary on a phase III trial of bevacizumab plus XELOX or FOLFOX4 for first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: the NO16966 trial

Replacing infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) leucovorin (LV) with oral capecitabine would be more convenient to patients, because it would lead to reduced hospital chair time and infusion-related toxicities. Previous trials with oral capecitabine-based regimens (other than XELOX [capecitabine/oxaliplatin]) have failed to demonstrate the equivalent efficacy of capecitabine based regimens to various 5-FU/oxaliplatin regimens (nonstandard FOLFOX [5-FU/LV/oxaliplatin] combinations); of note, these trials did not use the XELOX and standard FOLFOX regimens. An international phase III trial (NO16966) was initiated to demonstrate the noninferiority of XELOX to FOLFOX4 for the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. The protocol was later amended to compare bevacizumab and chemotherapy versus placebo and chemotherapy. The efficacy data showed that XELOX was as effective as FOLFOX4 (progression-free survival [PPS; intent-to-treat population]: hazard ratio [HR], 1.04; 97.5% confidence interval, 0.93-1.16). Also, bevacizumab/chemotherapy(pooled with XELOX or FOLFOX) significantly prolonged PPS (HR 0.83; p=0.0023) compared with placebo and chemotherapy (XELOX/FOLFOX). In subgroup analysis, the addition of bevacizumab to XELOX (9.3 months vs. 7.4 months. HR.0.77; P=0.0026) and FOLFOX4(9.4 months vs. 8.6 months; HR, 0.89; P = 0.1871) prolonged PFS compared with respective placebo arms; however, it did not show statistical significance with the FOLFOX4 regimen. The adverse events were manageable and comparable between treatment arms.     

Can inhibition of angiogenic pathways increase the efficacy of intravenous 5-fluorouracil-based regimens?

First-line irinotecan-containing regimens are toxic and may not be tolerated well by all patient subgroups. Trials evaluating less toxic regimens include a randomized, double-blind, multicenter study (AVF2192g) assessing 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV) with bevacizumab. Patients were randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. In arm 1, patients received LV intravenously (I.V.) over 2 hours and 5-FU I.V. over 1 hour every week for 6 weeks of an 8-week cycle, and bevacizumab 5 mg/kg was administered I.V. over 30-90 minutes every 2 weeks. In the second arm, patients received LV and 5-FU as in arm 1, and placebo I.V. over 30-90 minutes every 2 weeks. The primary objective was duration of survival. Eligible patients with untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) were >or= 65 years of age, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1/2, a serum albumin level 相似文献   

High-dose irinotecan plus LV5FU2 or simplified LV5FU (HD-FOLFIRI) for patients with untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: a new way to allow resection of liver metastases?

The antitumor efficacy of irinotecan may be dose dependent. This study aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of high-dose (HD) irinotecan combined with LV5FU2 or simplified LV5FU (LV5FUs) in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Patients and Methods: Patients with unresectable and measurable metastatic colorectal cancer, not pretreated for metastatic disease, were given irinotecan 260 mg/m(2) combined with LV5FU2 in the first 25 patients, then with LV5FUs (HD-FOLFIRI) in 35 patients. G-CSF was given in case of febrile neutropenia, grade 4 neutropenia >7 days or neutropenia grade >1 at day 15. Results: The response rate was 57% (95% confidence interval 43-69%). Second surgery with curative intent was performed in 28% of patients, leading to 20% radiological complete response. Median response duration, time to progression and overall survival were 11, 9 and 22 months, respectively. The median dose intensity of irinotecan was 117 mg/m(2)/week. G-CSF was given to 45% of patients over 33% of cycles. Usual toxicity of irinotecan and 5-FU were observed without major increased frequency, except hematological toxicity. Tolerance was similar with LV5FU2 and LV5FUs, though more asymptomatic grade 3-4 neutropenia was observed with LV5FU2. Conclusion: HD-irinotecan plus LV5FU2 or HD-FOLFIRI is feasible and achieved a high response rate and postsurgery complete response rate.     

Mucinous histology predicts for reduced fluorouracil responsiveness and survival in advanced colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Mucinous carcinoma of the colon and rectum (mucinous CRC) is a histological subtype of colorectal adenocarcinoma for which there is little data on chemotherapy responsiveness. The purpose of this study was to investigate specifically the efficacy of fluorouracil-based first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced mucinous CRC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients with advanced mucinous CRC enrolled in three prospective randomized trials evaluating infused 5-fluorouracil as first-line treatment were compared with patients with non-mucinous subtypes enrolled in the same trials in a case-control study. Prognostic factors associated with overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were identified using univariate and multivariate logistic and/or Cox proportional hazards analyses. RESULTS: The study included 135 patients (45 cases and 90 controls). The response rates for cases and controls were 22% [95% confidence interval (CI), 11% to 38%] and 47% (95% CI, 36.1% to 58.2%), respectively (P=0.0058). Median OS for the mucinous CRC patients was 11.8 months (95% CI, 8.87-14.8) compared with 17.9 months (95% CI, 13.38-22.39) in the control group (univariate analysis, P=0.056); after correcting for significant prognostic factors by multivariate Cox regression analysis, P=0.0372 and hazard ratio (HR)=1.497 (1.02-2.19). CONCLUSION: Patients with advanced mucinous CRC have a poorer response to fluorouracil-based first-line chemotherapy and reduced survival compared with patients with non-mucinous CRC.     

晚期结直肠癌内科治疗进展

晚期转移性结直肠癌的5年生存率低于10％。5-FU／LV方案治疗的中位生存期大约12个月。最近化疗方案的更新延长了患者的中位生存期。研究发现奥沙利铂、伊立替康联合5-FU／LV或者卡培他滨等化疗方案使中位生存期延长到20个月。奥沙利铂，伊立替康联合5-FU／LV比传统的单药5-FU／LV使生活质量改善时间延长。目前转移性结直肠癌标准的一线治疗方案为FOLFOX和FOLFIRI。正在进行的研究关注新的分子靶向药物（molecular targeted therapy）联合化疗治疗转移性结直肠癌，且部分试验取得了较好的疗效。本文将对5-FU、新一代化疗药物以及分子靶向药物在转移性结肠癌治疗的演进及新进展作一综述。     

Phase II, randomized trial comparing bevacizumab plus fluorouracil (FU)/leucovorin (LV) with FU/LV alone in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: This phase II trial investigated the safety and efficacy of two doses of bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody to vascular endothelial growth factor, plus fluorouracil (FU)/leucovorin (LV) versus FU/LV alone in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred four previously untreated patients with measurable metastatic colorectal cancer were randomly assigned to one of the following three treatment groups: 36 to FU (500 mg/m(2))/LV (500 mg/m(2)) alone, 35 to FU/LV + low-dose bevacizumab (5 mg/kg every 2 weeks), and 33 to FU/LV + high-dose bevacizumab (10 mg/kg every 2 weeks). FU/LV was given weekly for the first 6 weeks of each 8-week cycle. RESULTS: Compared with the FU/LV control arm, treatment with bevacizumab (at both dose levels) plus FU/LV resulted in higher response rates (control arm, 17%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 7% to 34%; low-dose arm, 40%, 95% CI, 24% to 58%; high-dose arm, 24%, 95% CI, 12% to 43%), longer median time to disease progression (control arm, 5.2 months, 95% CI, 3.5 to 5.6 months; low-dose arm, 9.0 months, 95% CI, 5.8 to 10.9 months; high-dose arm, 7.2 months, 95% CI, 3.8 to 9.2 months), and longer median survival (control arm, 13.8 months; 95% CI, 9.1 to 23.0 months; low-dose arm, 21.5 months, 95% CI, 17.3 to undetermined; high-dose arm, 16.1 months; 95% CI, 11.0 to 20.7 months). After cross-over, two of 22 patients had a partial response to bevacizumab alone. Thrombosis was the most significant adverse event and was fatal in one patient. Hypertension, proteinuria, and epistaxis were other potential safety concerns. CONCLUSION: The encouraging results of this randomized trial support further study of bevacizumab 5 mg/kg plus chemotherapy as first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer.     

Integrating the anti-VEGF-A humanized monoclonal antibody bevacizumab with chemotherapy in advanced colorectal cancer

Recent advances in the treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC) include the incorporation of new drugs to treat a disease where only one drug was known to be active. Oxaliplatin and irinotecan have been incorporated into 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based regimens where they have increased response rates and survival. Targeted therapies against the epidermal growth factor pathway and the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway are also on the forefront of oncology research, and are beginning to play a role in the treatment of CRC. Current research efforts are trying to optimize the integration of targeted therapies into chemotherapy regimens such as IFL (irinotecan/bolus 5-FU/leucovorin [LV]), FOLFIRI (irinotecan/infusional 5-FU/LV), and FOLFOX (oxaliplatin/infusional 5-FU/LV). In this article, the incorporation of the monoclonal antibody bevacizumab into the IFL regimen will be reviewed in detail. Bevacizumab targets VEGF-A, an important angiogenesis signaling factor commonly expressed in metastatic CRC. The addition of bevacizumab to the IFL regimen significantly increased response rates, median time to progression, and overall survival in patients receiving first-line treatment for CRC, thus leading the Food and Drug Administration to approve bevacizumab for the treatment of CRC in combination with 5-FU-based regimens. Bevacizumab treatment is associated with an increased rate of hypertension. In addition, there may be slight (1%-2%) but relevant increased risks related to gastrointestinal perforations and cardiovascular events. A modest increased risk of wound healing complications was observed in patients who underwent surgery while still receiving, or shortly after receiving, bevacizumab. Bevacizumab plus 5-FU is also a highly active first-line regimen. The role of bevacizumab with other first-line combination regimens, as well as its activity in the second-line setting, is now being determined by ongoing clinical trials.     

Survival of patients with advanced colorectal cancer improves with the availability of fluorouracil-leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin in the course of treatment.

PURPOSE: Fluorouracil (FU)-leucovorin (LV), irinotecan, and oxaliplatin administered alone or in combination have proven effective in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). Combination protocols using FU-LV with either irinotecan or oxaliplatin are currently regarded as standard first-line therapies in this disease. However, the importance of the availability of all three active cytotoxic agents, FU-LV, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin, on overall survival (OS) has not yet been evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed data from seven recently published phase III trials in advanced CRC to correlate the percentage of patients receiving second-line therapy and the percentage of patients receiving all three agents with the reported median OS, using a weighted analysis. RESULTS: The reported median OS is significantly correlated with the percentage of patients who received all three drugs in the course of their disease (P =.0008) but not with the percentage of patients who received any second-line therapy (P =.19). In addition, the use of combination protocols as first-line therapy was associated with a significant improvement in median survival of 3.5 months (95% CI, 1.27 to 5.73 months; P =.0083). CONCLUSION: Our results support the strategy of making these three active drugs available to all patients with advanced CRC who are candidates for such therapy to maximize OS. In addition, our findings suggest that, with the availability of effective salvage options, OS should no longer be regarded as the most appropriate end point by which to assess the efficacy of a palliative first-line treatment in CRC.     

Randomized multicenter phase II trial of a biweekly regimen of fluorouracil and leucovorin (LV5FU2), LV5FU2 plus cisplatin, or LV5FU2 plus irinotecan in patients with previously untreated metastatic gastric cancer: a Federation Francophone de Cancerologie Digestive Group Study--FFCD 9803.

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and safety of a biweekly regimen of leucovorin (LV) plus fluorouracil (FU) alone or in combination with cisplatin or irinotecan in patients with previously untreated metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma and to select the best arm for a phase III study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred thirty-six patients (two were ineligible) were enrolled onto the randomized multicenter phase II trial. Patients received LV 200 mg/m(2) (2-hour infusion) followed by FU 400 mg/m(2) (bolus) and FU 600 mg/m(2) (22-hour continuous infusion) on days 1 and 2 every 14 days (LV5FU2; arm A), LV5FU2 plus cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) (1-hour infusion) on day 1 or 2 (arm B), or LV5FU2 plus irinotecan 180 mg/m(2) (2-hour infusion) on day 1 (arm C). RESULTS: The overall response rates, which were confirmed by an independent expert panel, were 13% (95% CI, 3.4% to 23.3%), 27% (95% CI, 14.1% to 40.4%), and 40% (95% CI, 25.7% to 54.3%) for arms A, B, and C, respectively. Median progression-free survival and overall survival times were 3.2 months (95% CI, 1.8 to 4.6 months) and 6.8 months (95% CI, 2.6 to 11.1 months) with LV5FU2, respectively; 4.9 months (95% CI, 3.5 to 6.3 months) and 9.5 months (95% CI, 6.9 to 12.2 months) with LV5FU2-cisplatin, respectively; and 6.9 months (95% CI, 5.5 to 8.3 months) and 11.3 months (95% CI, 9.3 to 13.3 months) with LV5FU2-irinotecan, respectively. CONCLUSION: Of the three regimens tested, the combination of LV5FU2-irinotecan is the most promising and will be assessed in a phase III trial.     

Phase III study of weekly high-dose infusional fluorouracil plus folinic acid with or without irinotecan in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Gastrointestinal Group Study 40986.

PURPOSE: To demonstrate that adding irinotecan to a standard weekly schedule of high-dose, infusional fluorouracil (FU) and leucovorin (folinic acid [FA]) can prolong progression-free survival (PFS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four hundred thirty patients with measurable or assessable metastatic colorectal cancer were randomly assigned to receive either FA 500 mg/m(2) as a 2-hour infusion and FU 2.6 g/m(2) by intravenous 24-hour infusion, both administered weekly for 6 weeks, followed by a 2-week rest (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Internistische Onkologie [AIO] arm, n = 216), or a similar schedule but with FU 2.3 or 2.0 g/m(2) preceded by irinotecan 80 mg/m(2) administered over 30 minutes (experimental group, n = 214). RESULTS: The median PFS time in the experimental group was 8.5 months (95% CI, 7.6 to 9.9 months) compared with 6.4 months (95% CI, 5.3 to 7.2 months) in the AIO arm (P < .0001). The median overall survival time was increased from 16.9 to 20.1 months (P = .2779). The objective response rate was 62.2% (95% CI, 55.0% to 69.5%) in the experimental group and 34.4% (95% CI, 27.5% to 41.3%) in the AIO arm (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: The addition of irinotecan to the standard AIO FU/FA regimen was associated with a highly significant improvement in PFS and response rate and was well tolerated. The results of this study confirm that irinotecan in combination with high-dose infusional FU/FA is a reference first-line treatment.     

Rechallenge with bevacizumab in patients with glioblastoma progressing off therapy

Rechallenge with temozolomide has been shown to be a valid option in selected patients with progressive glioblastoma. Herein, we assessed the efficacy of rechallenge with bevacizumab in glioblastoma patients progressing off therapy. We retrospectively identified and analyzed the characteristics of patients with glioblastoma rechallenged with a bevacizumab-based chemotherapy regimen after having received bevacizumab as first-line treatment in association with temozolomide radiochemotherapy or at recurrence in association with temozolomide, CCNU or irinotecan. Twenty-five patients were identified. In all included patients, the first bevacizumab treatment resulted in an objective response and was discontinued for reasons other than disease progression (adverse event n?=?9, physician or patient decision n?=?16). Median duration of first bevacizumab treatment was 6 months (range: 2–58 months). None of the patients presented a rebound effect after bevacizumab discontinuation. The median interval between discontinuation of first bevacizumab treatment and bevacizumab rechallenge was 8.9 months (range: 2–58 months). At this time, bevacizumab was given in association with lomustine (n?=?17), temozolomide (n?=?6), irinotecan (n?=?1), or alone (n?=?1). Bevacizumab rechallenge resulted in an objective response in 15 patients (60%). Median progression-free survival was 6.7 months and overall survival was 9.6 months after bevacizumab rechallenge. Timing of first bevacizumab treatment (as first-line treatment or at recurrence) was not associated with the duration of response after treatment rechallenge. In the present series, patients who responded to bevacizumab and in whom this treatment was discontinued in the absence of tumor progression seemed to benefit from rechallenge with a bevacizumab-based chemotherapy regimen.     

Bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy in the second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: results from the phase II BEVACOLOR study

BackgroundThis prospective phase II study assessed the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab plus chemotherapy regimens commonly used in the second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).MethodsPatients with mCRC who progressed or relapsed after first-line oxaliplatin-based or irinotecan-based treatment received bevacizumab 2.5 mg/kg/week plus chemotherapy until disease progression. The primary endpoint was disease-control rate (DCR). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety.ResultsFifty-three patients (66% men; median age, 62 years old) received second-line bevacizumab plus folinic acid, fluorouracil, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI; 57%), folinic acid, fluorouracil, oxaliplatin (FOLFOX; 26%), irinotecan (15%), or capecitabine plus irinotecan (XELIRI; 2%). The DCR was 87% (95% CI, 77%-97%); ORR was 32% (95% CI, 19%-46%). Median PFS was 6.5 months (95% CI, 5.8-7.8 months) and median OS 19.3 months, (95% CI, 14.2-25.1 months).The most frequent grade 3/4 adverse events included neutropenia (21%), diarrhea (15%), asthenia, and vomiting (9% each). Five patients (9%) had grade 3/4 targeted toxicities: grade 3 hypertension (n = 2), grade 3 venous thromboembolism (n = 2), and grade 4 arterial thromboembolism (n = 1). None of these events led to death during the study.ConclusionBevacizumab plus standard second-line chemotherapy is highly active in patients with mCRC and has an acceptable safety profile.