Effectiveness and safety of immunization with live-attenuated and inactivated vaccines for pediatric liver transplantation recipients

BackgroundLiver transplantation recipients are at high risk for severe complications due to infections because of being treated with immunosuppressive drugs that affect the immune system. Vaccination for liver transplantation candidates is generally recommended before surgery, but the opportunities for vaccination prior to transplantation in pediatric candidates are often limited by severe disease conditions.MethodsThe participants in this study comprised 39 pediatric recipients of living donor liver transplantation performed between 2005 and 2013. Criteria for administering live-attenuated (measles, rubella, mumps, and varicella) and inactivated (hepatitis B, pertussis, and Japanese encephalitis) vaccines were as follows: (1) >1 year after transplantation; (2) no use of systemic steroids to treat acute rejection within the last 6 months; (3) serum trough concentration of tacrolimus <5 ng/mL; (4) no severe immunosuppression according to blood examinations; and (5) provision of written informed consent. Median age at transplantation was 17 months, and median period from transplantation to the beginning of immunization was 18 months.ResultsSeroprotection rates for measles, rubella, mumps, varicella, hepatitis B, pertussis, and Japanese encephalitis after post-transplant immunization were 44% (11/25), 70% (19/27), 48% (12/25), 32% (6/19), 83% (19/23), 87% (13/15), and 88% (7/8), respectively. Seroprotection rates for measles, rubella, mumps, and varicella after second vaccination for recipients with primary vaccine failure after first vaccination were 100% (8/8), 50% (1/2), 71% (5/7), and 50% (5/10), respectively. While four recipients contracted mumps and eight contracted varicella before immunization, one recipient developed varicella after immunization. No serious systemic adverse events were observed in vaccinated recipients.ConclusionsSeroprotection rates for measles, mumps, and varicella appeared low in children after the first post-transplantation vaccination. Immunizations with four live-attenuated and three inactivated vaccines were safe and effective for pediatric liver transplantation recipients who were not severely immunosuppressed.     

Oral and inactivated poliovirus vaccines in the newborn: A review

Background

Oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) remains the vaccine-of-choice for routine immunization and supplemental immunization activities (SIAs) to eradicate poliomyelitis globally. Recent data from India suggested lower than expected immunogenicity of an OPV birth dose, prompting a review of the immunogenicity of OPV or inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) when administered at birth.

Methods

We evaluated the seroconversion and reported adverse events among infants given a single birth dose (given ≤7 days of life) of OPV or IPV through a systematic review of published articles and conference abstracts from 1959 to 2011 in any language found on PubMed, Google Scholar, or reference lists of selected articles.

Results

25 articles from 13 countries published between 1959 and 2011 documented seroconversion rates in newborns following an OPV dose given within the first seven days of life. There were 10 studies that measured seroconversion rates between 4 and 8 weeks of a single birth dose of TOPV, using an umbilical cord blood draw at the time of birth to establish baseline antibody levels. The percentage of newborns who seroconverted at 8 weeks range from 6–42% for poliovirus type 1, 2–63% for type 2, and 1–35% for type 3. For mOPV type 1, seroconversion ranged from 10 to 76%; mOPV type 3, the range was 12–58%; and for the one study reporting bOPV, it was 20% for type 1 and 7% for type 3. There were four studies of IPV in newborns with a seroconversion rate of 8–100% for serotype 1, 15–100% for serotype 2, and 15–94% for serotype 3, measured at 4–6 weeks of life. No serious adverse events related to newborn OPV or IPV dosing were reported, including no cases of acute flaccid paralysis.

Conclusions

There is great variability of the immunogenicity of a birth dose of OPV for reasons largely unknown. Our review confirms the utility of a birth dose of OPV, particularly in countries where early induction of polio immunity is imperative. IPV has higher seroconversion rates in newborns and may be a superior choice in countries which can afford IPV, but there have been few studies of an IPV dose for newborns.     

流行性乙型脑炎灭活疫苗与减毒活疫苗相结合的免疫策略研究

目的　为合理利用流行性乙型脑炎 (乙脑 )灭活疫苗和减毒活疫苗各自的优点 ,降低预防接种反应的发生率 ,提高免疫学效果 ,开展了乙脑灭活疫苗与减毒活疫苗相结合的免疫策略研究。方法　观察比较两种疫苗单一使用与联合使用的免疫学效果及安全性。结果　联合使用组在疫苗接种后 2 4h的全身中强以上发热反应发生率为 0 .73 % ,局部红晕反应为 1 .46 % ,而单一使用灭活疫苗组的发热反应发生率为 2 .8%。不同观察组疫苗接种后中和抗体几何平均滴度由免疫前的 1∶1 .0 5～1∶3 .35上升至 1∶47.34～ 1∶1 0 1 .30 ,联合使用组的中和抗体阳转率为 97.67% ,明显高于单一使用灭活疫苗组 86 .2 7%的阳转率 (χ2 =3 .89,P <0 .0 5) ,但与单一使用减毒活疫苗组 93 .75 %的阳转率差异无显著性 (χ2 =0 .74,P >0 .0 5)。结论　研究表明对婴幼儿使用乙脑灭活疫苗基础免疫、减毒活疫苗加强免疫有很好的免疫学效果及安全性 ,也是切实可行和比较理想的免疫策略     

Safety of COVID-19 vaccines during pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundAssessment of COVID-19 vaccines safety during pregnancy is urgently needed.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the safety of COVID-19 vaccines, including their components and technological platforms used in other vaccines during pregnancy and animal studies to complement direct evidence. We searched literature databases from its inception to September 2021 without language restriction, COVID-19 vaccine websites, and reference lists of other systematic reviews and the included studies. Pairs of reviewers independently selected, data extracted, and assessed the risk of bias of the studies. Discrepancies were resolved by consensus. (PROSPERO CRD42021234185).ResultsWe retrieved 8,837 records from the literature search; 71 studies were included, involving 17,719,495 pregnant persons and 389 pregnant animals. Most studies (94%) were conducted in high-income countries, were cohort studies (51%), and 15% were classified as high risk of bias. We identified nine COVID-19 vaccine studies, seven involving 309,164 pregnant persons, mostly exposed to mRNA vaccines. Among non-COVID-19 vaccines, the most frequent exposures were AS03 and aluminum-based adjuvants.A meta-analysis of studies that adjusted for potential confounders showed no association with adverse outcomes, regardless of the vaccine or the trimester of vaccination.Neither the reported rates of adverse pregnancy outcomes nor reactogenicity exceeded expected background rates, which was the case for ASO3- or aluminum-adjuvanted non-COVID-19 vaccines in the proportion meta-analyses of uncontrolled studies/arms. The only exception was postpartum hemorrhage after COVID-19 vaccination (10.40%; 95% CI: 6.49–15.10%), reported by two studies; however, the comparison with non-exposed pregnant persons, available for one study, found non-statistically significant differences (adjusted OR 1.09; 95% CI 0.56–2.12). Animal studies showed consistent results with studies in pregnant persons.ConclusionWe found no safety concerns for currently administered COVID-19 vaccines during pregnancy. Additional experimental and real-world evidence could enhance vaccination coverage. Robust safety data for non-mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines are still needed.     

A systematic review of adverse events following immunization during pregnancy and the newborn period

In 2013, the WHO Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization (SAGE) requested WHO to develop a process and a plan to move the maternal immunization agenda forward in support of an increased alignment of data safety evidence, public health needs, and regulatory processes. A key challenge identified was the continued need for harmonization of maternal adverse event following immunization (AEFI) research and surveillance efforts within developing and developed country contexts. We conducted a systematic review as a preliminary step in the development of standardized AEFI definitions for use in maternal and neonatal clinical trials, post-licensure surveillance, and other vaccine studies. We documented the current extent and nature of variability in AEFI definitions and adverse event reporting among 74 maternal immunization studies, which reported a total of 240 different types of adverse events. Forty-nine studies provided explicit AEFI case definitions describing 35 separate types of AEFIs. We identified variability in how AEFIs were determined to be present, in how AEFI definitions were applied, and in the ways that AEFIs were reported. Definitions for key maternal/neonatal AEFIs differed on four discrete attributes: overall level of detail, physiological and temporal boundaries and cut-offs, severity strata, and standards used. Our findings suggest that investigators may proactively address these inconsistencies through comprehensive and consistent reporting of AEFI definitions and outcomes in future publications. In addition, efforts to develop standardized AEFI definitions should generate definitions of sufficient detail and consistency of language to avoid the ambiguities we identified in reviewed articles, while remaining practically applicable given the constraints of low-resource contexts such as limited diagnostic capacity and high patient throughput.     

Characterization of immune responses induced by inactivated,live attenuated and DNA vaccines against Japanese encephalitis virus in mice

Vaccination is the most effective countermeasure for protecting individuals from Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) infection. There are two types of JEV vaccines currently used in China: the Vero cell-derived inactivated vaccine and the live attenuated vaccine. In this study, we characterized the immune response and protective efficacy induced in mice by the inactivated vaccine, live attenuated vaccine and the DNA vaccine candidate pCAG-JME, which expresses JEV prM-E proteins. We found that the live attenuated vaccine conferred 100% protection and resulted in the generation of high levels of specific anti-JEV antibodies and cytokines. The pCAG-JME vaccine induced protective immunity as well as the live attenuated vaccine. Unexpectedly, immunization with the inactivated vaccine only induced a limited immune response and partial protection, which may be due to the decreased activity of dendritic cells and the expansion of CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells observed in these mice. Altogether, our results suggest that the live attenuated vaccine is more effective in providing protection against JEV infection than the inactivated vaccine and that pCAG-JME will be a potential JEV vaccine candidate.     

High resolution identity testing of inactivated poliovirus vaccines

BackgroundDefinitive identification of poliovirus strains in vaccines is essential for quality control, particularly where multiple wild-type and Sabin strains are produced in the same facility. Sequence-based identification provides the ultimate in identity testing and would offer several advantages over serological methods.MethodsWe employed random RT-PCR and high throughput sequencing to recover full-length genome sequences from monovalent and trivalent poliovirus vaccine products at various stages of the manufacturing process.ResultsAll expected strains were detected in previously characterised products and the method permitted identification of strains comprising as little as 0.1% of sequence reads. Highly similar Mahoney and Sabin 1 strains were readily discriminated on the basis of specific variant positions. Analysis of a product known to contain incorrect strains demonstrated that the method correctly identified the contaminants.ConclusionRandom RT-PCR and shotgun sequencing provided high resolution identification of vaccine components. In addition to the recovery of full-length genome sequences, the method could also be easily adapted to the characterisation of minor variant frequencies and distinction of closely related products on the basis of distinguishing consensus and low frequency polymorphisms.     

Understanding factors influencing vaccination acceptance during pregnancy globally: A literature review

Maternal vaccination has been evaluated and found to be extremely effective at preventing illness in pregnant women and new-borns; however, uptake of such programmes has been low in some areas.To analyse factors contributing to uptake of vaccines globally, a systematic review on vaccine hesitancy was carried out by The Vaccine Confidence Project in 2012. In order to further analyse factors contributing to uptake of maternal immunisation, a further search within the broader systematic review was conducted using the terms ‘Pregnan*’ or ‘Matern*’. Forty-two articles were identified. Pregnancy-related articles were further screened to identify those focused on concerns, trust and access issues regarding maternal vaccination reported by pregnant women and healthcare workers. Thirty-five relevant articles were included which were then searched using the snowballing technique to identify additional relevant references cited in these articles. A search alert was also conducted from February to April 2015 in PubMed to ensure that no new relevant articles were missed. A total of 155 relevant articles were included.Most of the literature which was identified on hesitancy surrounding vaccination during pregnancy reports on determinants of influenza vaccine uptake in North America. Research conducted in low-income countries focused primarily on tetanus vaccine acceptance. The main barriers cited were related to vaccine safety, belief that vaccine not needed or effective, not recommended by healthcare worker, low knowledge about vaacines, access issues, cost, conflicting advice. From the point of view of healthcare workers, barriers included inadequate training, inadequate reimbursement and increased workload. Twenty-seven out of 46 (59%) articles mentioning ethnicity reported lower rates of coverage among ethnic minorities.Barriers to vaccination in pregnancy are complex and vary depending on context and population. There are wide gaps in knowledge regarding the attitudes of healthcare workers and how ethnicity and gender dynamics influence a pregnant woman's decision to vaccinate.     

A systematic review of the evidence on the effectiveness and risks of inactivated influenza vaccines in different target groups

Purpose

To systematically review the evidence regarding the efficacy, effectiveness and risks of the use of inactivated influenza vaccines in children, healthy adults, elderly individuals and individuals with co-morbidities such as diabetes, chronic lung disease, cardiovascular disease, kidney or liver disease and immune suppression.

Methods

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews was searched for relevant reviews and supplemented with searches of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials database and Medline. Two reviewers independently assessed review and trial quality and extracted data.

Results and conclusions

The inactivated influenza vaccine has been proven effective in preventing laboratory-confirmed influenza among healthy adults (16-65 years) and children (≥6 years) (GRADE A evidence). However, there is strikingly limited good-quality evidence (all GRADE B, C or not existing) of the effectiveness of influenza vaccination on complications such as pneumonia, hospitalisation and influenza-specific and overall mortality. Inconsistent results are found in studies among children younger than 6 years, individuals with COPD, institutionalised elderly (65 years or older), elderly with co-morbidities and healthcare workers in elderly homes, which can only be explained by bias of unknown origin. The vaccination of pregnant women might be beneficial for their newborns, and vaccination of children might be protective in non-recipients of the vaccine of all ages living in the same community (one RCT, Grade B evidence).     

Impact of maternal and pre-existing antibodies on immunogenicity of inactivated rotavirus vaccines

Rotavirus (RV) is a major pathogen causing severe diarrhea in infants and children aged less than 5 years. Vaccination is an economically feasible and effective strategy to prevent rotavirus infections. However, immune efficacy of live vaccines could be interfered by maternal antibodies and pre-existing antibodies of children. To develop an inactivated rotavirus vaccine (IRV), we had previously isolated a wild-type human rotavirus strain ZTR-68-A (G1P[8]) from the fecal samples of infants having severe diarrhea in a region endemic for the presence of this pathogen. In our present study, we assessed whether the presence of maternal and pre-existing antibodies in newborn BALB/c mice affected the immunogenicity of IRV administered to these animals. Our results indicate that maternal antibodies, generated from either vaccine immunization or rotavirus infection, showed partial influence with the immune responses generated by two doses of IRV vaccination. Increasing the number of immunizations can significantly improve the titer of serum neutralizing antibody and a seroconversion rate of up to 100%. In newborn mice, single-virus infection did not elicit detectable levels of serum neutralizing antibodies. After an IRV vaccination, the immune responses of these mice remained unaffected, with no significant differences in titers compared with those of control-group mice. In summary, choosing a suitable immunization dose and dosing frequency is essential for the immune effectiveness of IRV. The results of this study will provide animal experimental support for the IRV clinical research in future.     

Post-marketing surveillance of adverse events following immunization with inactivated quadrivalent and trivalent influenza vaccine in health care providers in Western Australia

In 2015, inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIV) was first introduced into the Australian market. A routine vaccine safety surveillance system in Western Australia was used to conduct post-licensure surveillance of adverse events following immunization with inactivated QIV and trivalent influenza vaccines (TIV) in a sample of 1685 healthcare providers (HCPs). A similar percentage of HCPs who received QIV reported having any reaction seven days post-vaccination as HCPs who received TIV (13.6 vs. 12.8%, respectively; p = 0.66). However, a slightly higher percentage of HCPs who received QIV reported pain or swelling at the injection site as compared to HCPs who received TIV (6.9% vs. 4.2%, respectively; p = 0.02). No serious vaccine-associated adverse events were detected during follow-up of either vaccine. Acknowledging the study limitations, the results of this post-marketing surveillance support the safety of QIV, suggesting there is little difference in the reactogenicity of QIV as compared to TIV.     

Studies on the usefulness of intranasal inactivated influenza vaccines

Intranasal inactivated influenza vaccines have the advantage over parenteral vaccines in that they are not associated with the pain of an injection. However, they would be most useful if they were available for all age groups, including high-risk groups, and also would provide cross-protection against variant virus strains. Supporting the latter objective is our observation that intranasal inactivated vaccines provide cross-protection against variants within a subtype of the A virus (or variants within the B virus), together with inducing highly cross-reactive secretory-IgA antibodies to viral HA and the weakly cross-reactive IgG antibodies in the respiratory tract. This review summarizes the most important observations of our studies on intranasal inactivated influenza vaccines, which have been ongoing since 1987. These studies center on a mouse model of influenza in which mice are immunized intranasally with inactivated vaccines mixed with a cholera toxin B subunit adjuvant and then infected with mouse-adapted influenza viruses.     

Safety of concomitant administration of inactivated hepatitis A vaccine with other vaccines in children under 16 years old in post-marketing surveillance

BackgroundConcomitant administration refers to the receipt of two or more vaccines during a single healthcare encounter, which is an efficient way to increase vaccination coverage in children. However, the post-marketing safety studies of concomitant administration are scarce. Inactivated hepatitis A vaccine (Healive®) has been used widely in China and other countries for more than a decade. We aimed to explore the safety of Healive® co-administered with other vaccines compared to Healive® alone in children under 16 years old.MethodsWe retrieved Adverse Events Following Immunization (AEFI) cases and vaccination doses of Healive® during 2020–2021 in Shanghai, China. The AEFI cases were divided into concomitant administration group and Healive® alone group. We used administrative data on vaccine doses as denominators to calculate and compare crude reporting rates between groups. We also compared baseline gender and age distribution, clinical diagnoses, and time interval from vaccination to onset of symptoms between groups.ResultsA total 319,247 doses of inactivated hepatitis A vaccine (Healive®) were used and 1,020 AEFI cases (319.50 per million doses) associated with Healive® were reported during 2020–2021 in Shanghai. There were 259,346 doses concomitantly administered with other vaccines and 830 AEFI cases (320.04 per million doses) were reported. There were 59,901 doses of Healive® that vaccinated alone, with 190 AEFI cases (317.19 per million doses). There was only one case with serious AEFI in concomitant administration group, with a rate of 0.39 per million doses. Reported rates of AEFI cases were similar between groups in general (p > 0.05).ConclusionConcomitant administration of inactivated hepatitis A vaccine (Healive®) with other vaccines has a similar safe profile as Healive® alone.     

Uptake and safety of Hepatitis B vaccination during pregnancy: A Vaccine Safety Datalink study

IntroductionHepatitis B virus (HBV) infection acquired during pregnancy can pose a risk to the infant at birth that can lead to significant and lifelong morbidity. Hepatitis B vaccine (HepB) is recommended for anyone at increased risk for contracting HBV infection, including pregnant women. Limited data are available on the safety of HepB administration during pregnancy.ObjectivesTo assess the frequency of maternal HepB receipt among pregnant women and evaluate the potential association between maternal vaccination and pre-specified maternal and infant safety outcomes.MethodsWe examined a retrospective cohort of pregnancies in the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) resulting in live birth outcomes from 2004 through 2015. Eligible pregnancies in women aged 12–55 years who were continuously enrolled from 6 months pre-pregnancy to 6 weeks postpartum in VSD integrated health systems were included. We compared pregnancies with HepB exposure to those with other vaccine exposures, and to those with no vaccine exposures. High-risk conditions for contracting HBV infection were identified up to one-year prior to or during the pregnancy using ICD-9 codes. Maternal and fetal adverse events were also evaluated according to maternal HepB exposure status.ResultsAmong over 650,000 pregnancies in the study period, HepB was administered at a rate of 2.1 per 1000 pregnancies (n = 1399), commonly within the first 5 weeks of pregnancy. Less than 3% of the HepB-exposed group had a high-risk ICD-9 code indicating need for HepB; this was similar to the rate among HepB unvaccinated groups. There were no significant associations between HepB exposure during pregnancy and gestational hypertension, gestational diabetes, pre-eclampsia/eclampsia, cesarean delivery, pre-term delivery, low birthweight or small for gestational age infants.ConclusionsMost women who received maternal HepB did not have high-risk indications for vaccination. No increased risk for the adverse events that were examined were observed among women who received maternal HepB or their offspring.     

Comparing live attenuated and inactivated hepatitis A vaccines: an immunogenicity study after one single dose

Introduction

While three types of hepatitis A vaccines are available in China, little data are available to compare them in terms of early antibody response. We conducted a trial to compare antibody response at 7, 14 and 28 days.

Methods

We randomized primary school children in Gansu and Jilin provinces into four groups to receive either (1) Chinese live attenuated hepatitis A vaccine (H2 strain), (2) domestic inactivated hepatitis A vaccine (Healive^®), (3) imported inactivated hepatitis A vaccine (Havrix^®) or (4) hepatitis B vaccine (Control group). We compared groups at 7, 14 and 28 days in terms of proportion of sero-conversions (≥10 mUI/ml), and Geometric Mean Concentration (GMC) of antibodies measured with a Microparticle Enzyme Immunoassay (MEIA). We compared rates of self-reported adverse events following immunization (AEFI) in the first three days.

Results

204 children received the H2 vaccine, 208 received Healive^®, 214 received Havrix^®, and 215 received hepatitis B vaccine (no differences across groups in terms of age, sex, weight and height). At seven days, sero-conversion proportions were 25%, 35%, 27% and 2% (p < 0.0001) with GMC of 6 mIU/ml, 8 mIU/ml, 6 mIU/ml and 3 mIU/ml, respectively for the four groups. At 28 days, sero-conversion proportions were 98%, 100%, 93% and 3% (p < 0.0001) with GMC of 47 mIU/ml, 71 mIU/ml, 67 mIU/ml and 3 mIU/ml, respectively. AEFI were benign and did not differ across groups (p = 0.94).

Conclusions

While our study was not able to identify differences between Havrix^®, Healive^® and H2 vaccine in terms of sero-conversion proportion and GMC between seven and 28 days, further studies should evaluate non-inferiority or equivalence of the Chinese vaccines, particularly with respect to the GMC concentration for the H2 vaccine since it could affect long-term protection.     

Safety of tetanus,diphtheria, acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccination during pregnancy

The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety of prenatal tetanus, diphtheria, acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccination. This cohort study was conducted among pregnant members at Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC). The exposed cohort consisted of women who received Tdap vaccine on or after the 27th week of pregnancy between January 2018 and January 2019. The unexposed cohort consisted of matched women who were pregnant between January 2012 and December 2014 and were not vaccinated with any Tdap vaccine throughout their pregnancy. Maternal and infant characteristics and pre-specified endpoints were collected through automated data and review of the electronic health records. Unadjusted and adjusted relative risks (aRRs) with confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated by Poisson regression. Non-inferiority testing (i.e., to rule out a two-fold increase) was conducted for primary endpoints with adjustment for multiplicity. Superiority testing was conducted without multiplicity adjustment for secondary endpoints. The analysis consisted of 16,606 pairs of Tdap recipients and unexposed pregnant women. For the primary endpoints, the aRR for preeclampsia/eclampsia was 1.38 (98.75% CI:1.21–1.58) and the aRR for intrauterine infection was 1.28 (98.75% CI:1.12–1.47). These increases were consistent with the background increasing trend of these diagnoses among all pregnant women at KPSC since 2011, and the upper limit of the 98.75% CI of both aRRs did not exceed the pre-specified threshold of 2. No increased risks of small for gestational age (aRR = 1.04, 98.75% CI:0.94–1.16) or preterm delivery (aRR = 0.71, 98.75% CI:0.64–0.78) were observed. No evidence of increased risks for secondary endpoints, including poor fetal growth, preterm pre-labor rupture of membranes, stillbirth/fetal death, placental abruption, transfusion during delivery hospitalization, and neonatal death, was observed. Prenatal Tdap vaccination after the 27th week of pregnancy was not associated with increased risks of pre-specified maternal and infant outcomes, supporting the safety of Tdap vaccination during pregnancy.     

Uptake and safety of hepatitis A vaccination during pregnancy: A Vaccine Safety Datalink study

IntroductionInfection with hepatitis A virus (HAV) during pregnancy, although uncommon, is associated with gestational complications and pre-term labor. Hepatitis A vaccine (HepA) is recommended for anyone at increased risk for contracting hepatitis A, including women at risk who are also pregnant. Limited data are available on the safety of maternal HepA vaccination.ObjectivesAssess the frequency of maternal HepA receipt and evaluate the potential association between maternal vaccination and pre-specified maternal and infant safety outcomes.MethodsA retrospective cohort of pregnancies in the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) resulting in live births from 2004 through 2015 was included. Pregnancies with HepA exposure were compared to those with other vaccine exposures, and to those with no vaccine exposures. Risk factors for contracting hepatitis A were identified up to one-year prior to or during the pregnancy using ICD-9 codes. Maternal and fetal adverse events were evaluated according to maternal HepA exposure status. Adjusted odds ratio (OR) were used to describe the association.ResultsAmong 666,233 pregnancies in the study period, HepA was administered at a rate of 1.7 per 1000 (n = 1140), most commonly within the first six weeks of pregnancy. Less than 3% of those exposed to HepA during pregnancy had an ICD-confirmed risk factor. There were no significant associations between HepA exposure during pregnancy and gestational hypertension, gestational diabetes, pre-eclampsia/eclampsia, cesarean delivery, pre-term delivery, and low birthweight. There was a statistically significant association between HepA exposure during pregnancy and small-for-gestational age (SGA) infants (aOR 1.32, [95% CI 1.09, 1.60], p = 0.004).ConclusionsThe rate of maternal HepA vaccination was low and rarely due to documented risk factors for vaccination. HepA vaccination during pregnancy was not associated with an increased risk for a range of adverse events examined among pregnancies resulting in live births, but an identified association between maternal HepA and SGA infant outcomes, while likely due to unmeasured confounding, warrants further exploration.     

Maternal benefits of immunization during pregnancy

The US Centers for Disease Control & Prevention currently recommend routine immunization to prevent 17 vaccine-preventable diseases that occur in infants, children, adolescents, or adults. Pregnant women are at particularly high risk for morbidity and mortality related to several vaccine-preventable diseases. Furthermore, such illnesses are also associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes such as spontaneous abortion, congenital anomalies, preterm birth, and low birthweight. In addition to directly preventing maternal infection, vaccination during pregnancy may offer fetal and infant benefit through passive immunization. Several vaccines aimed at providing passive immunity to neonates are either currently recommended or in development. This article specifically addresses maternal benefits of maternal immunization following (1) vaccines recommended for all pregnant women; (2) vaccines recommended for pregnant women with particular risk factors; and (3) novel vaccines currently under development that primarily aim to at reduce infant morbidity and mortality.     

Safety of live, attenuated oral vaccines in HIV-infected Zambian adults: Oral vaccines in HIV

Background

Current recommendations are that HIV-infected persons should not be given live vaccines. We set out to assess potential toxicity of three live, attenuated oral vaccines (against rotavirus, typhoid and ETEC) in a phase 1 study.

Methods

Two commercially available oral vaccines against rotavirus (Rotarix) and typhoid (Vivotif) and one candidate vaccine against Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ACAM2017) were given to HIV seropositive (n = 42) and HIV seronegative (n = 59) adults. Gastrointestinal symptoms were sought actively by weekly interview up to 1 month of vaccination. In rotavirus vaccine recipients, intestinal biopsies were collected by endoscopy and evaluated for expression of IL-8 and pro-inflammatory cytokines.

Results

No difference was observed between symptoms in HIV infected and HIV uninfected vaccinees, except for diarrhoea reported more than 7 days after the last dose of vaccine. If only diarrhoea episodes within 7 days of vaccination are included, diarrhoea was not more frequent in HIV seropositive than in HIV seronegative vaccinees (OR 6.7, 95% CI 1.2–67; P = 0.09). However, if later episodes of diarrhoea are included, a significant increase in diarrhoea was demonstrated (OR 5.3, 95% CI 0.98–53; P = 0.04). All episodes were mild and transient. IL-8 was slowly up-regulated over the week following vaccination (P = 0.02), but IL-β, IFNγ or TNFα were not.

Conclusions

No evidence was found of adverse events following administration of these three vaccines, except for late episodes of diarrhoea which may not be attributable to vaccination. Our data do not support the need for a prohibition on oral administration of live, attenuated vaccines to all HIV infected adults, though further work on severely immunocompromised adults and children are required.     

Clinical development and regulatory points for consideration for second-generation live attenuated dengue vaccines

Licensing and decisions on public health use of a vaccine rely on a robust clinical development program that permits a risk-benefit assessment of the product in the target population. Studies undertaken early in clinical development, as well as well-designed pivotal trials, allow for this robust characterization. In 2012, WHO published guidelines on the quality, safety and efficacy of live attenuated dengue tetravalent vaccines. Subsequently, efficacy and longer-term follow-up data have become available from two Phase 3 trials of a dengue vaccine, conducted in parallel, and the vaccine was licensed in December 2015. The findings and interpretation of the results from these trials released both before and after licensure have highlighted key complexities for tetravalent dengue vaccines, including concerns vaccination could increase the incidence of dengue disease in certain subpopulations. This report summarizes clinical and regulatory points for consideration that may guide vaccine developers on some aspects of trial design and facilitate regulatory review to enable broader public health recommendations for second-generation dengue vaccines.