Value of first day angiography/angioplasty in evolving Non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction: an open multicenter randomized trial. The VINO Study.

AIMS: Direct angioplasty is an effective treatment for ST-elevation myocardial infarction. The role of very early angioplasty in non-ST-elevation infarction is not known. Thus, a randomized study of first day angiography/angioplasty vs early conservative therapy of evolving myocardial infarction without persistent ST-elevation was conducted. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-one patients with confirmed acute myocardial infarction without ST-segment elevations were randomized within 24 h of last rest chest pain: 64 in the first day angiography/angioplasty group and 67 in the early conservative group (coronary angiography only after recurrent or stress induced myocardial ischaemia). RESULTS: All patients in the invasive group underwent coronary angiography on the day of admission (mean randomization-angiography time 6.2 h). First day angioplasty of the infarct related artery was performed in 47% of the patients and bypass surgery in 35%. In the conservative group, 55% underwent coronary angiography, 10% angioplasty and 30% bypass surgery within 6 months. The primary end-point (death/reinfarction) at 6 months occurred in 6.2% vs 22.3% (P<0.001). Six month mortality in the first day angiography/angioplasty group was 3.1% vs 13.4% in the conservative group (P<0.03). Non-fatal reinfarction occurred in 3.1% vs. 14.9% (P<0.02). CONCLUSIONS: First day coronary angiography followed by angioplasty whenever possible reduces mortality and reinfarction in evolving myocardial infarction without persistent ST-elevation, in comparison with an early conservative treatment strategy.     

Primary angioplasty for cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction.

To evaluate the role of primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in cardiogenic shock, 53 patients admitted with the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock were studied. Thirty-five (66.0%) patients received intravenous thrombolytic therapy (streptokinase 15 lac units) and 18 (34.0%) underwent primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. There was no significant difference in the mean age, risk factor profile, presence of prior myocardial infarction, site of myocardial infarction and cardiac enzyme levels at presentation between the two groups. More male patients were present in the group undergoing primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (94.44% vs 68.57%; p = 0.04). The time delay between the onset of symptoms and presentation to the hospital did not differ significantly between the two groups (318.9 vs 320.0 minutes; p = NS). In the primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty group, 17 patients had a single infarct-related artery and one had both left anterior descending and right coronary artery occlusion. Thus in 18 patients, 19 vessels were attempted. Angiographic success (< 50% residual stenosis) was achieved in 15 (78.94%) vessels of which TIMI III flow was achieved in 10 (52.63%) vessels and TIMI II flow in five (26.31%). Intra-aortic balloon pump was needed in five (27.77%) patients undergoing coronary angioplasty. In-hospital mortality was 27.77 percent in patients undergoing primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and 57.14 percent in patients receiving intravenous thrombolytic therapy (p = 0.04). In the thrombolytic therapy group, mortality was higher (85.91%) in patients presenting six hours or later after the onset of symptoms as compared to those presenting in less than six hours of the onset of symptoms (50%). In primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty group, mortality was 21.42 percent in patients with successful and 50 percent in patients with failed angioplasty. Thus, in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock, an aggressive invasive strategy with primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, as compared to intravenous thrombolytic therapy, is helpful in reducing in-hospital mortality.     

Favorable early and long-term prognosis following coronary bypass surgery therapy for myocardial infarction: results of a multicenter trial. TAMI Study Group

Coronary bypass surgery was performed before hospital discharge on 82 (21%) of 386 consecutive patients enrolled in the Thrombolysis and Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (TAMI) multicenter trial of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator and coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. Time from infarct symptom onset to coronary bypass surgery was 7.3 +/- 1.9 hours for 24 patients operated upon on an emergency basis and 9.3 +/- 5.2 days for 58 patients having late in-hospital surgery. There were no operative deaths and five in-hospital deaths in the surgical group, all of which occurred in patients with preoperative cardiogenic shock. Although patients in the surgical group were older (59.7 +/- 10.4 years versus 54.9 +/- 10.2 years; p = 0.03), had more extensive coronary artery disease (42% three-vessel disease versus 11%; p = 0.001), and had a higher incidence of anterior wall myocardial infarction (48% versus 39%; p = 0.02), in-hospital mortality for the surgical group (6%) was similar to that in 301 patients not undergoing surgery (7%) in this trial. For patients discharged from the hospital, mortality at 1 year was 2.5% in the surgical group and 1.8% in patients not having coronary bypass surgery before hospital discharge. At a 1 year follow-up, there were no significant differences in the frequency of cardiac or noncardiac-related hospitalizations or in event-free survival between surgical and nonsurgical groups. The majority of patients in both groups considered themselves to be in excellent or good condition. Coronary bypass surgery can be performed with low morbidity and mortality rates in close temporal association to acute myocardial infarction.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Safety of single versus multi-vessel angioplasty for patients with acute myocardial infarction and multi-vessel coronary artery disease: report from the New York State Angioplasty Registry

BACKGROUND: The conventional strategy for primary angioplasty during acute myocardial infarction is angioplasty of the infarct-related vessel, even in patients with multi-vessel disease. Patients, however, often have significant lesions in multiple coronary arteries and a strategy for multi-vessel angioplasty during acute myocardial infarction has not been explored. The purpose of this study was to examine whether multi-vessel angioplasty is as safe as infarct-related vessel angioplasty in patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease during acute myocardial infarction. METHODS: Using the 2000-2001 New York State Angioplasty Registry database, we compared the in-hospital clinical outcomes of patients with multi-vessel disease (>70% stenosis in at least two major coronary arteries), who underwent either multi-vessel angioplasty (n=632) or infarct-related vessel angioplasty (n=1350) within 24 h of acute myocardial infarction. Patients with previous myocardial infarction, angioplasty, bypass surgery, or cardiogenic shock were excluded. RESULTS: Patients in the multi-vessel angioplasty group were less likely to be female, to have peripheral vascular disease or diabetes. They had more complex lesions and were more likely to receive stents. In-hospital mortality was three-fold lower (0.8 versus 2.3%, P=0.018) in the multi-vessel angioplasty group. No differences were observed in other ischemic complications, renal failure, or length of stay. After multivariate analysis, multi-vessel angioplasty remained a significant predictor of lower in-hospital death (odds ratio=0.27, 95% confidence interval=0.08-0.90, P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the added complexity of multi-vessel angioplasty, patients in this group had significantly lower in-hospital mortality. Therefore, a strategy of multi-vessel angioplasty during acute myocardial infarction may be safe compared with infarct-related angioplasty in selected patients.     

Cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: the use of coronary angioplasty and the integration of the new support devices into patient management.

Conventional therapy for cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction continues to be associated with a high in-hospital mortality rate. Hemodynamic support with new mechanical devices and emergency coronary revascularization may alter the long-term prognosis for patients with this complication. Between July 1985 and March 1990, 68 patients presented to the University of Michigan with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock. Interventions performed included thrombolytic therapy (46%), intraaortic balloon pump counterpulsation (70%), cardiac catheterization (86%), coronary angioplasty (73%), emergency coronary artery bypass grafting/ventricular septal defect repair (15%), Hemopump insertion (11%), percutaneous cardiopulmonary support (4%) and ventricular assist device (3%). The 30-day survival rate was significantly better in patients who had successful angioplasty of the infarct-related artery than in patients with failed angioplasty (61% vs. 7%, p = 0.002) or no attempt at angioplasty (61% vs. 14%, p = 0.003). This difference was maintained over the 1-year follow-up period. The only clinical variable that predicted survival was age less than 65 years. The early use of the new support devices in 10 patients was associated with death in 8 (80%), but this poor outcome may reflect a selection bias for an especially high risk population. Collectively, these recent data continue to suggest that emergency revascularization with angioplasty may reduce the mortality rate, but further study is required to define optimal utilization and integration of new support devices.     

Primary coronary angioplasty in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: prediction of the thirty-day mortality risk in an unselected population of patients.

BACKGROUND: The 30-day mortality in catheter-based reperfusion therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction varies widely in the literature and only some factors, such as cardiogenic shock, are clearly associated with the risk. This non-randomized, single center study investigates the potential factors influencing the 30-day mortality in 586 consecutive patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction, treated with primary coronary angioplasty (PTCA). METHODS: In the whole series and in two subgroups (with and without cardiogenic shock) the clinical, angiographic and procedural variables were used to develop multivariate statistical models for the prediction of the endpoint. RESULTS: The overall 30-day mortality was 7.3%: 35.8 and 4.5% in patients with and without cardiogenic shock, respectively (p < 0.001). Independent predictors of the 30-day mortality included: a) in the entire series: shock, PTCA angiographic success, time to treatment, age, and coronary artery disease extension; b) in patients with cardiogenic shock: PTCA angiographic success, time to treatment, coronary artery disease extension, and use of abciximab; c) in patients without cardiogenic shock: time to treatment, age, and coronary artery disease extension. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction submitted to primary PTCA, the 30-day mortality rate is a highly predictable endpoint. The role of abciximab therapy and of other independent predictors varies according to the presence or otherwise of cardiogenic shock.     

Primary angioplasty of unprotected left main coronary artery for acute anterolateral myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND: Mortality of acute unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) occlusion is very high. The objectives of this analysis were to determine the effect of primary angioplasty and the impact of cardiogenic shock on unprotected LMCA occlusion-induced acute anterolateral myocardial infarction (AAMI). METHODS: Of 1,736 consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), 38 (2.2%) had LMCA occlusion-induced AAMI with Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow less than or equal to 2. All were given primary angioplasty. RESULTS: Of these 38 patients, 17 (45%) were discharged, and 21 (55%) died in-hospital. Cardiogenic shock was overt in 28 patients; 47.1% of the survival group and 95.2% of the mortality group (p=0.0008). On arrival, the survival-group had higher pH (7.40+/-0.10 vs. 7.30+/-0.14; p=0.013) and base excess (-4.5+/-3.9 vs. -10.4+/-6.0 mEq/L; p=0.0013). In the survival group reperfusion was successful in 100% of patients, as opposed to 57.1% in the mortality group (p=0.0020), and the incident of stenting was not different between the two groups (64.7% vs. 71.4%, p=0.66). Shock patients had lower successful angioplasty rate (67.9% vs. 100%, p=0.040), higher in-hospital mortality (71.4% vs. 10.0%, p=0.0008), and higher 1-year mortality rates (p=0.0064), than stable patients. All shock patients with failed angioplasty died, but the mortality rate was 57.9% (p=0.021) when angioplasty was successful. CONCLUSIONS: Patients presenting with AAMI, LMCA occlusion, and cardiogenic shock have poor survival regardless of primary angioplasty in conjunction with coronary stents. Nevertheless, primary angioplasty is a feasible and effective procedure, and it may save lives in this clinical setting.     

In-hospital and long-term mortality in women with acute myocardial infarction treated by primary angioplasty

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Mortality and morbidity after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are higher in women than men. It is not clear whether reperfusion by elective treatment with primary angioplasty can improve the poor prognosis in women with this condition. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of sex on clinical characteristics, and on in-hospital and long-term outcomes in patients with STEMI undergoing reperfusion by primary angioplasty. METHODS: A prospective observational study was performed in 838 consecutive patients with STEMI treated by primary angioplasty at a single hospital. Of these, 183 (22%) were women. RESULTS: Women were older (70 years vs 62 years; P<.01), were less frequently smokers (8% vs 53%; P<.01), more frequently had diabetes (45% vs 27%; P<.01) or hypertension (59% vs 36%; P<.01), presented later for angioplasty (4.1 h vs 3.6 h; P=.05), and experienced cardiogenic shock more frequently during the procedure (21% vs 12%; P<.01). There were no differences in the culprit vessel most often responsible for the infarction, in the procedural success rate, or in stent or glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor use. The total in-hospital mortality rate was higher in women (22% vs 9%; P<.01), as was the adjusted in-hospital rate (odds ratio 2.5, 95% confidence interval 1.2-5.2). During long-term follow-up after discharge (median 35.4 months), there was no significant difference in age-adjusted survival rate (relative risk 1.2, 95% confidence interval 0.7-1.9). CONCLUSIONS: Despite recent advances in the treatment of STEMI, women experience greater in-hospital mortality, even after adjustment for baseline clinical characteristics. However, the long-term age-adjusted mortality rate in women discharged from hospital was similar to that in men.     

Cardiogenic shock: single center experience with and without on-site catheterization facilities

BACKGROUND: The beneficial effect of on-site catheterization facilities on the survival of all patients with myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock has been questioned. Our objective was to evaluate the impact of the availability of on-site catheterization facilities on the outcome of unselected patients with cardiogenic shock. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied the hospital records of 70 consecutive patients with cardiogenic shock admitted to our intensive coronary care unit during 1990-1996, and compared two groups of patients: those admitted before (n = 34) and after (n = 36) the opening of our catheterization laboratory. Patients admitted when the catheterization laboratory was available were of similar age, but included fewer males and fewer patients with prior myocardial infarction. Following the activation of the catheterization laboratory, utilization rates of coronary angiography, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and intra-aortic balloon pump increased, compared with the previous period. However, there was no improvement in in-hospital (88 vs. 83%; p = 0.7) and 30-day mortality (91 vs. 86%; p = 0.7) before versus after the activation of our catheterization laboratory. Twelve patients selected to cardiac catheterization (9 underwent percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty) experienced lower in-hospital and 30-day mortality compared with patients who were not selected (58 vs. 96, and 67 vs. 96%, respectively; p < 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Following the activation of the catheterization laboratory, the mortality of the entire population of cardiogenic shock patients remained relatively unchanged. Still, a small subgroup of these patients selected for urgent cardiac catheterization had a lower mortality compared with patients who were not selected.     

Long-term results after acute percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock

The aim of this study was to determine the long-term outcome in unselected, consecutive patients after acute percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTCA) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock. This involved a follow-up study from a prospectively conducted patient registry in a tertiary referral center. A total of 59 patients (10 female/49 male; median age 62 years (32-91)) with percutaneous transluminal cardiac interventions in primary cardiogenic shock were identified between January 1995 and January 2000. Twenty-two patients (37%) had been resuscitated successfully before intervention. The in-hospital mortality of shock patients was 36% (n=21, median age 68 (47-84)). The median follow-up of survivors was 18.1 (7-57.3) months, during which three further patients died (8%; two because of sudden cardiac deaths, one because of acute reinfarction). Achievement of thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow III after acute PTCA (84% in survivors vs. 38% in non-survivors; P<0.001) and the absence of the left main coronary artery (3% survivors vs. 29% non-survivors; P=0.003) as culprit lesion in patients with cardiogenic shock was strongly associated with an improved survival rate. A second cardiac intervention was performed in seven patients (18%). Overall functional capacity of shock survivors was good. At final follow-up, 80% of the survivors were completely asymptomatic. One patient had angina pectoris NYHA II, five patients dyspnoea NYHA class II. Exercise stress-test was performed in 24 of the 38 surviving patients, median exercise capacity was 100% (range 55-113%) of the age adjusted predicted value. In unselected patients with cardiogenic shock due to AMI, treatment with acute PTCA resulted in an in-hospital mortality of 36%, low late mortality and good functional capacity in long-term survivors. TIMI flow grade III after acute PTCA in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock was strongly associated with an improved survival rate whereas the left main coronary artery as culprit lesion was associated with worse outcome.     

Comparison of primary balloon angioplasty with bailout stenting strategy to primary coronary stenting strategy in the treatment of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)

BACKGROUND: In recent years significant progress has been made in invasive treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Primary coronary stenting is currently a routine strategy which replaced primary balloon angioplasty with bailout stenting preferred in the past. Studies comparing these two strategies of stenting in AMI are scarce. AIM: To compare the immediate and long-term outcomes after primary angioplasty strategy and bailout stenting versus primary stent placement strategy in patients with AMI. METHODS: We analysed data from a single-centre registry of consecutive patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction admitted between January 1998 and October 2003. In our centre in years 1998-2000 stenting was used only after failed or suboptimal balloon angioplasty. Starting from year 2001 we used routine primary stenting strategy. We compared these two angioplasty strategies applied in different time intervals with regard to in-hospital outcome and long-term mortality. Patients with cardiogenic shock at admission were excluded. RESULTS: Out of a total of 1602 patients treated invasively for AMI (cardiogenic shock excluded) 479 underwent primary balloon angioplasty strategy with bailout stenting - group 1 (years 1998-2000) and 1123 were treated with primary stenting strategy - group 2 (years 2001-2003). In group 1 bailout stenting occurred in 34.4% of patients whereas in group 2 stents were implanted in 83% of patients. Patients in the balloon angioplasty group were younger, had shorter time from the onset of symptom to hospital arrival and more frequently underwent rescue coronary intervention after failed thrombolysis. In-hospital mortality was 2.9 vs. 2.4% in groups 1 and 2, respectively (p=NS). Twenty-four month mortality rate was 9.8% in group 1 and 10.06% in group 2 (p=NS). CONCLUSIONS: 1. Effectiveness of coronary angioplasty is high and comparable in both groups. 2. In-hospital and long-term mortality and procedure-related complication rate are all low and comparable with both stenting strategies. 3. Independent factors increasing long-term mortality include: culprit vessel reocclusion, multivessel coronary disease, older age and hypertension. 4. Patients with complete patency of culprit vessel restored and with higher left ventricular ejection fraction presented lower 2-year mortality rate. 5. Bailout stenting did not increase 2-year mortality.     

Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in patients with cardiogenic shock.

In cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty has been reported to significantly improve the modest survival benefits afforded by emergency surgical revascularization and thrombolytic therapy. The records of all patients who underwent angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock were retrospectively reviewed to determine whether coronary angioplasty improves survival. Of the 45 patients, 28 (group 1, 62%) had successful dilation of the infarct-related artery and 17 (group 2, 38%) had unsuccessful angioplasty. The groups were similar in extent of coronary artery disease, infarct location, incidence of multivessel disease and hemodynamic variables. The overall hospital survival rate was 56% (71% in group 1 and 29% in group 2). Group 1 patients had more left main coronary artery disease, and group 2 patients were older and had a higher incidence of prior myocardial infarction. Multivariate analysis showed that the survival advantage in patients with successful angioplasty was statistically significant (p = 0.014) when these factors were taken into account. At a mean follow-up interval of 2.3 years (range 1 month to 5.6 years), there were five deaths (four cardiac and one noncardiac), for a 2.3-year survival rate of 80% in patients surviving to hospital discharge. During the follow-up period, 36% of hospital survivors had repeat hospitalization for cardiac evaluation, 8% had myocardial infarction, 8% had coronary artery bypass surgery and 24% had angina.     

Predictors of survival after contemporary percutaneous coronary revascularization for acute myocardial infarction in the real world

Management strategies for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) have undergone great evolution over the past decade. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the in-hospital and long-term clinical outcomes, as well as predictors of survival, among patients who received the most contemporary percutaneous coronary revascularization strategies for STEMI in real clinical practice. During the period from October 1, 2000 to April 30, 2002, 316 patients have undergone primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in a tertiary University hospital, the in-hospital (11.1%), 30-day (13.9%) and long-term (21.8%) mortality rates were higher than that reported in randomized studies. This is likely to be due to the higher prevalence of adverse clinical profiles. Multivariable analysis show that age >65, cardiogenic shock, resuscitated cardiac arrest and intubation independently predicted in-hospital and long-term mortality, while multi-vessel disease predicted major adverse cardiac event (MACE). Among patients with cardiogenic shock, similar mortality was observed in patients with anterior myocardial infarction (MI) or inferior MI with/without right ventricle involvement.     

Early and late results of coronary angioplasty without antecedent thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction

Direct coronary angioplasty without antecedent thrombolytic therapy was performed in 500 consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction. Anterior and inferior infarctions were noted in 217 and 283 patients, respectively. Two hundred fifteen patients (43%) had 1-vessel disease, 85 patients (17%) were greater than 70 years of age and 39 (8%) presented in cardiogenic shock. Successful angioplasty of the infarct vessel was achieved in 94% of patients. The overall in-hospital mortality was 7.2%. Cardiogenic shock, 3-vessel disease and failed angioplasty were the 3 strongest multivariate correlates of early mortality. Reocclusion of the infarct-vessel was noted in 47 (15%) of the 307 patients with angiographic follow-up before hospital discharge. Significant bleeding complications occurred in only 3% of patients; stroke or myocardial rupture was not seen. The global ejection fraction increased from 53% on the preangioplasty ventriculograms to 59% at 1 week (p less than 0.001). Significant regional wall motion improvement in the infarct segments was noted in 53% of patients. Global ejection fraction improved most dramatically in patients presenting with baseline ejection fractions less than or equal to 45% (increasing from 36 to 50%). The 1- and 5-year survival rates after hospital discharge were 95 and 84%, respectively. The 1-year reinfarction rate was 3%. Thus, direct coronary angioplasty was highly effective in reestablishing infarct-vessel patency and salvaging ischemic myocardium, resulting in low in-hospital and long-term mortality.     

70岁及以上患者冠状动脉无保护左主干病变支架置入术后的随访研究

目的 观察年龄70岁及以上患者无保护左主干病变经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)预后的近期和长期临床随访结果。 方法 回顾性分析100例无保护左主干病变行药物洗脱支架置入患者临床资料,比较年龄70～90岁组(52例)和37～69岁组(48例)的病死率、心肌梗死、再次血运重建及其综合终点。 结果 两组危险因素、血管病变及置入支架等基线资料比较,差异无统计学意义（均P＞0.05）。70～90岁组和37～69岁组手术成功率分别为96.2％(50例)与97.9％（47例）,差异无统计学意义(x2=1.75,P＞0.05),住院病死率分别为3.8％（2例）与2.1％（1例）,差异无统计学意义（x2 =0.27,P＞0.05）。两组平均随访时间分别为（22.0±2.5）个月与（23.0±11.7）个月,差异无统计学意义（t=-0.78,P＞0.05）。随访期间70～90岁与37～69岁组病死率、心肌梗死、再次PCI分别为3.8％（2例）与2.1％（1例）、7.7％（4例）与4.2％（2例）和13.5％（7例）与12.5％(6例),差异无统计学意义（x2值分别为2.51、0.55、0.02,均P＞0.05）,死亡、心肌梗死及再次血运重建综合终点分别为30.8％（16例）与18.8％（9例）,差异无统计学意义(x2= 1.92,P＞0.05)。 结论 70岁及以上患者冠状动脉无保护左主干病变药物洗脱支架置入手术成功率高,长期随访安全有效。     

Coronary perfusion during acute myocardial infarction with a combined therapy of coronary angioplasty and high-dose intravenous streptokinase

Two hundred and sixteen patients with acute myocardial infarction were treated with immediate infusion of high-dose (1.5 million units) intravenous streptokinase followed by emergency coronary angioplasty. The infarct lesion was crossed and dilated in 99% and persistent coronary perfusion after the procedure was achieved in 90% (including 3% with significant residual stenosis). Total in-hospital mortality was 12%. Multivariable analysis showed a higher hospital mortality with cardiogenic shock (41% vs 5% without shock), older age, lower left ventricular ejection fraction, and female sex. Final patency of the infarct-related vessel was determined by follow-up in-hospital cardiac catheterization. Coronary reocclusion occurred in 11% (symptomatic in 7%, treated with emergency angioplasty or bypass surgery; silent in 4%, treated medically). Of the surviving patients with successful initial establishment of infarct vessel patency, 94% were discharged from the hospital with an open infarct artery or a bypass graft to the infarct vessel. There was significant improvement in both ejection fraction (44% to 49%; p less than .0001) and regional wall motion in the infarct zone (-3.0 SD to -2.4 SD; p less than .0001) among patients with persistent coronary perfusion and insignificant residual stenosis at the time of the follow-up cardiac catheterization. Thus, a treatment strategy for acute myocardial infarction that includes immediate administration of streptokinase followed by emergency coronary angioplasty, and coronary bypass surgery when necessary, results in a high rate of early and sustained patency of the infarct-related vessel.     

Timing and mechanism of in-hospital and late death after primary coronary angioplasty during acute myocardial infarction

The effect of early myocardial reperfusion on patterns of death after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is unknown. Thus, the mechanism and timing of in-hospital and late deaths among a group of 614 patients treated with coronary angioplasty without antecedent thrombolytic therapy for AMI were determined. Death occurred in 49 patients (8%) before hospital discharge. Four patients died in the catheterization laboratory. Death was due to cardiogenic shock in 22 patients, acute vessel reclosure in 5 patients, was sudden in 8 patients and followed elective coronary artery bypass surgery in 8 patients. Cardiac rupture was observed in only 2 patients after failed infarct angioplasty, and did not occur among the 574 patients with successful infarct reperfusion. Intracranial hemorrhage did not occur. Multivariate predictors of in-hospital death included failed infarct angioplasty, cardiogenic shock, 3-vessel coronary artery disease and age greater than or equal to 70 years. During a follow-up period of 32 +/- 21 months (range 1 to 87), 55 patients died. The cause of death was cardiac in 36 patients, including an arrhythmic death in 23 patients and was due to circulatory failure in 13 others. One patient died of reinfarction due to late reclosure of the infarct artery. Actuarial survival curves demonstrated overall survival after hospital discharge of 95 and 87% at 1 and 4 years, respectively. Freedom from cardiac death at 1 and 4 years was 96 and 92%. Multivariate predictors of late death included 3-vessel disease, a baseline ejection fraction of less than or equal to 40%, age greater than 70 years and female gender.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Characteristics and outcome of patients with ST‐elevation infarction in relation to whether they received thrombolysis or underwent acute coronary angiography: Are we selecting the right patients for coronary angiography?

BACKGROUND: During the last decade, there has been an on-going debate with regard to whether percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or thrombolysis should be preferred in patients with ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Some studies clearly advocate PCI, while others do not. HYPOTHESIS: The study aimed to describe the characteristics and to evaluate outcome of patients with suspected ST-elevation or left bundle-branch block infarction in relation to whether they received thrombolysis or had an acute coronary angiography aiming at angioplasty. METHODS: The study included all patients admitted to Sahlgrenska University Hospital in G?teborg, Sweden, with suspected acute myocardial infarction who, during 1995-1999, had ST-elevation or left bundle-branch block on admission electrocardiogram (ECG) requiring either thrombolysis or acute coronary angiography. A retrospective evaluation with a follow-up of 1 year after the intervention was made. RESULTS: In all, 413 patients had thrombolytic treatment and 400 had acute coronary angiography. The patients who received thrombolysis were older (mean age 70.3 vs. 64.1 years). Mortality during 1 year of follow-up was 20.9% in the thrombolysis group and 16.6% in the angiography group (p = 0.12). Among patients in whom acute coronary angiography was performed, only 85% underwent acute percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). There was a mortality of 12.1 vs. 41.7% among those who did not undergo acute PCI. Development of reinfarction, stroke, and requirement of rehospitalization was similar regardless of type of initial intervention. The thrombolysis group more frequently required new coronary angiography (36.9 vs. 20.6%; p<0.0001) and new PCI (17.8 vs. 11.9%; p = 0.01). Despite this, after 1 year symptoms of angina pectoris were observed in 27% of patients in the thrombolysis group and in only 14% of those in the angiography group (p = 0.0002). CONCLUSION: In a Swedish university hospital with a high volume of coronary angioplasty procedures, we found no significant difference in mortality between patients who had thrombolysis and those who underwent acute coronary angiography. However, requirement of revascularization and symptoms of angina pectoris 1 year later was considerably less frequent in those who had undergone acute coronary angiography. However, distribution of baseline characteristics was skewed and efforts should be focused on the selection of patients for the different reperfusion strategies.     

Primary angioplasty for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction: experience at two community hospitals without cardiac surgery

OBJECTIVES: We sought to establish the safety and efficacy of primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) at two community hospitals without on-site cardiac surgery. BACKGROUND: Though randomized studies indicate that primary angioplasty in AMI may result in superior outcomes compared with fibrinolytic therapy, the performance of primary angioplasty at hospitals without cardiac surgery is debated. METHODS: Three experienced operators performed 506 consecutive immediate coronary angiograms with primary angioplasty when appropriate in patients with suspected AMI at two community hospitals without cardiac surgery, following established rigorous program criteria. RESULTS: Clinical high risk predictors (Killip class 3 or 4, age > or = 75 years, anterior AMI, out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation) and/or angiographic high risk predictors (left main or three-vessel disease or ejection fraction <45%) were present in 69.6%. Angioplasty was performed in 66.2%, with a median time from emergency department presentation to first angiogram of 94 min and a procedural success rate of 94.3%. The in-hospital mortality for the entire study population was 5.3%. Of those without initial cardiogenic shock, the in-hospital mortality was 3.0%. Of 300 patients who were discharged after primary angioplasty, only four died within the first 6 months, with 97.7% follow-up. No patient died or needed emergent aortocoronary bypass surgery because of new myocardial jeopardy caused by a complication of the cardiac catheterization or angioplasty procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Immediate coronary angiography with primary angioplasty when appropriate in patients with AMI can be performed safely and effectively in community hospitals without on-site cardiac surgery when rigorous program criteria are established.     

Mortality prognostic factors of cardiogenic shock complicating an acute myocardial infarction and treated by percutaneous coronary intervention

OBJECTIVE: To determine the in-hospital prognosis and late outcome of cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction treated by early (< 24 hours) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: Retrospective monocentric study of a consecutive cohort of patients undergoing early PCI (< 24 heures) for cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction from 1994 to 2004. RESULTS: The cohort included 175 patients (mean age = 65 +/- 14 years, 68% male). A successful PCI was obtained in 69% of patients. The in-hospital mortality was 43%. Independent risk factors associated with an increased mortality were: absence of TIMI three flow (P < 0.0001), absence of smoking (P < 0.009) and the need for mechanical ventilation (P < 0.002). Nor stent use or anti GP IIb/IIa infusions were predictors of a better outcome. At hospital discharge, mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 38 +/- 12%. Kaplan-Meier estimate of survival was 63% for in-hospital survivors (maximum follow-up = 9 years). Independent predictors of an impaired long-term outcome were: a LVEF < 0.3 (P < 0.028) and 3-vessel disease on coronary angiography (P < 0.004). CONCLUSION: In-hospital mortality of patients suffering cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction and treated by PCI remains high despite PCI improvement. The long-term survival appears, however, to be better than that of patients with coronary artery disease and low LVEF.