Risk Factors for Abdominal Wound Dehiscence in Children: A Case-Control Study

Background  In the limited literature concerning abdominal wound dehiscence after laparotomy in children, reported incidences range between 0.2–1.2% with associated mortality rates of 8–45%. The goal of this retrospective case-control study was to identify major risk factors for abdominal wound dehiscence in the pediatric population. Methods  Patients younger than aged 18 years who developed abdominal wound dehiscence in three pediatric surgical centers during the period 1985–2005 were identified. For each patient with abdominal wound dehiscence, four controls were selected by systematic random sampling. Patients with (a history of) open abdomen treatment or abdominal wound dehiscence were excluded as control subjects. Putative relevant patient-related, operation-related, and postoperative variables for both cases and control subjects were evaluated in univariate analyses and subsequently entered in multivariate stepwise logistic regression models to identify major independent predictors of abdominal wound dehiscence. Results  A total number of 63 patients with abdominal wound dehiscence and 252 control subjects were analyzed. Mean presentation of abdominal wound dehiscence was at postoperative day 5 (range, 1–15) and overall mortality was 11%. Hospital stay was significantly longer (p < 0.001) in the case group (median, 42 vs. 10 days). Major independent risk factors for abdominal wound dehiscence were younger than aged 1 year, wound infection, median incision, and emergency surgery. Incisional hernia was reported in 12% of the patients with abdominal wound dehiscence versus 3% in the control group (p = 0.001). Conclusions  Abdominal wound dehiscence is a serious complication with high morbidity and mortality. Median incisions should be avoided whenever possible.     

Wound management after colon injury: open or closed? A prospective randomized trial

It is unknown whether leaving the skin wound open to heal by secondary intention is associated with a lower rate of wound infections compared with primary skin-wound closure after operations for colon injuries. From June 1998 to December 2000 at our Level I academic trauma center 48 patients entered into a randomized controlled trial (RCT) and were randomized to have their skin wound primarily closed (CLOSED-RCT) or left open (OPEN-RCT). At the same time patients not included in the RCT were followed prospectively. At the discretion of the surgeon their skin wounds were managed by primary closure (CLOSED-nonRCT) or were left open (OPEN-nonRCT). Univariate and multivariate analysis was done to identify independent risk factors of wound infection, wound dehiscence, and necrotizing soft tissue infection. Wound infection developed in 65 per cent of CLOSED-RCT and 36 per cent of OPEN-RCT patients (P = 0.04) and wound dehiscence in 31 per cent and 14 per cent respectively (P = 0.18). No remarkable differences were noted in any other variable including length of hospital stay. Wound infection developed in 29 per cent of CLOSED-nonRCT and 15 per cent of OPEN-nonRCT patients (P = 0.46). There were three independent risk factors of wound infection: primary wound closure [odds ratio (OR) = 5.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.8-19.4], colectomy (OR = 3.4, 95% CI = 1.2-10.4), and intraabdominal infection (OR = 5.3, 95% CI = 1.3-24.2). There were two independent risk factors for wound dehiscence and/or necrotizing soft tissue infection: wound infection (OR = 20.9, 95% CI = 4.9-152.3) and intra-abdominal infection (OR = 19.3, 95% CI = 4.0-146.9). Primary closure of the wound almost doubles the rate of wound infection compared with leaving the wound open in operations for colon injuries. Primary wound closure is a risk factor for wound infection and wound infection is a risk factor for wound dehiscence or necrotizing soft tissue infection. Because of the complexity of evaluating the real clinical significance of superficial wound infection larger studies on trauma patients are required.     

Wound Outcome Following Primary and Delayed Primary Skin Closure Techniques After Laparotomy for Non-Traumatic Ileal Perforation: a Randomized Clinical Trial

To study the effect of primary and delayed primary closure of skin incision on wound outcome in patients with non-traumatic ileal perforation, 68 patients of ileal perforation were studied in a prospective randomized clinical trial. Patients fulfilling inclusion criteria were divided into ileostomy and non-ileostomy groups, both of which were then randomized into two subgroups each depending on whether skin was closed primarily or in a delayed primary manner. Wound infection and dehiscence were the main outcome parameters studied. The data collected was analyzed using appropriate statistical tools taking significant p value at 5 %. Most patients were 21–30 years of age. Male:female ratio was 3.2:1. The overall incidence of wound infection was 63 %. Wound infection was strongly associated with the incidence of superficial wound dehiscence and total wound dehiscence that were 11.76 and 47 %, respectively. Mortality was 10.3 %. Methodology of wound closure has no significant impact on incidence of wound infection, wound dehiscence, and mortality, although the onset of wound complications is significantly delayed with delayed primary closure of the skin.     

Macromastia as a Factor in Sternal Wound Dehiscence Following Cardiac Surgery: Management Combining Chest Wall Reconstruction and Reduction Mammoplasty

Major sternal wound infection occurs in nearly 2% of patients following coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The relationship of this complication to gender has not been reported in detail, nor has female breast size previously been implicated as a factor increasing the risk of sternotomy dehiscence. We report two cases of sternotomy wound dehiscence in women with large, pendulous breasts undergoing myocardial revascularization surgery and postulate that the weight of large, unsupported breasts produced inferolateral tension on the midline sternotomy incisions, contributing to dehiscence of the wounds. Chest wall reconstruction was accomplished using pectoralis muscle flaps, and the procedures were combined with amputative reduction of the size of the breasts, with subsequently successful healing in each case. Combining sternal reconstruction with breast reduction surgery may lead to improved secondary outcome, and postoperative use of supportive brassieres may reduce the frequency of this complication.     

Quadriceps keystone island flap for radical inguinal lymphadenectomy: a reliable locoregional island flap for large groin defects

Background: Radical inguinal lymphadenectomy (RIL) for bulky metastatic melanoma and non‐melanoma skin cancers of the inguinal region, while shown to improve morbidity and survival oncologically, can result in substantial morbidity from wound complications. Skin defects cannot be closed primarily and the substantial dead space predisposes to seroma, wound dehiscence and infection. Despite the clear need for reconstructive options, extended series describing reconstruction of large inguinal defects in this setting have not been reported. Methods: A prospectively entered, retrospectively reviewed study of 20 consecutive patients undergoing quadriceps keystone island flaps (QKIF) for the closure of complicated inguinal defects is described. Results: There was 100% flap survival, with no partial or complete flap losses. A reduction in wound breakdown/dehiscence from reported rates was seen, with four patients (20%) having wound breakdown, compared to double that rate in reported series. Other wound complications comprised six patients (30%) with mild wound infections, seven patients (35%) with seromas and two patients (10%) with haematomas. Conclusion: The QKIF is an effective means of reconstructing inguinal defects after RIL, particularly in high‐risk patients, and is technically simpler than other reconstructive techniques advocated for this purpose. Furthermore, the QKIF offers patients with advanced disease (where management is primarily palliative) a potentially improved quality of life with reduced operative morbidity.     

Are wound complications after a kidney transplant more common with modern immunosuppression?

BACKGROUND: The most common surgical complication after a kidney transplant is likely related to the wound. The purpose of this analysis was to determine the incidence of, and risk factors for, wound complications (e.g., infections, hernias) in kidney recipients and to assess whether newer immunosuppressive drugs increase the risk for such complications. METHODS: Between January 1, 1984 and September 30, 1998, we performed 2013 adult kidney transplants. Of these 2013 recipients, 97 (4.8%) developed either a superficial or a deep wound infection. Additionally, 73 (3.6%) recipients developed either a fascial dehiscence or a hernia of the wound. We used univariate and multivariate techniques to determine significant risk factors and outcomes. RESULTS: Mean time to development of a superficial infection (defined as located above the fascia) was 11.9 days posttransplant; to development of a deep infection (defined as located below the fascia), 39.2 days; and to development of a hernia or fascial dehiscence, 12.8 months. By multivariate analysis, the most significant risk factor for a superficial or deep wound infection was obesity (defined as body mass index>30 kg/m2) (RR=4.4, P=0.0001). Other significant risk factors were a urine leak posttransplant, any reoperation through the transplant incision, diabetes, and the use of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (vs. azathioprine) for maintenance immunosuppression (RR=2.43, P=0.0001). Significant risk factors for a hernia or fascial dehiscence were any reoperation through the transplant incision, increased recipient age, obesity, and the use of MMF (vs. azathioprine) for maintenance immunosuppression (RR=3.54, P=0.0004). Use of antibody induction and treatment for acute rejection were not significant risk factors for either infections or hernias. Death-censored graft survival was lower in recipients who developed a wound infection (vs. those who did not); it was not lower in recipients who developed an incisional hernia or facial dehiscence (vs. those who did not). CONCLUSIONS: Despite immunosuppression including chronic steroids, the incidence of wound infections, incisional hernias, and fascial dehiscence is low in kidney recipients. As with other types of surgery, the main risk factors for postoperative complications are obesity, reoperation, and increased age. However, in kidney recipients, use of MMF (vs. azathioprine) is an additional risk factor -one that potentially could be altered, especially in high-risk recipients.     

Multiple laparotomies are a predictor of fascial dehiscence in the setting of severe trauma

The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of wound dehiscence after repeat trauma laparotomy. We performed a retrospective analysis of adult trauma patients who underwent laparotomy at an urban level 1 trauma center during the past 5 years. Patients were divided into single (SL) and multiple laparotomy (ML) groups. Demographic, clinical, and outcome data were collected. Data were analyzed using chi2, t testing, and ANOVA. Overall dehiscence rate was 0.7 per cent. Multiple laparotomy patients had damage control, staged management of their injuries, or abdominal compartment syndrome as the reason for reexploration. SL and ML patients had similar age and sex. ML patients had a higher rate of intra-abdominal abscess than SL patients (13.7% vs 1.2% P < 0.0001), but intra-abdominal abscess did not predict wound dehiscence in the ML group (P = 0.24). This was true in spite of the fact that ML patients had a significantly higher Injury Severity Score (ISS) than SL patients (21.68 vs 14.35, P < 0.0001). Interestingly, wound infection did not predict dehiscence. Patients undergoing repeat laparotomy after trauma are at increased risk for wound dehiscence. This risk appears to be associated with intraabdominal abscess and ISS, but not wound infection. Surgeons should leave the skin open in the setting of repeat trauma laparotomy, which will allow serial assessment of the integrity of the fascial closure.     

Ten-year experience with Mersilene-reinforced sternal wound closure

BACKGROUND: We were interested in reviewing our experience with Mersilene-reinforced sternal wound closure to evaluate its overall morbidity and its impact on patient management. METHODS: We reviewed our experience with 1,039 patients undergoing median sternotomy with Mersilene-reinforced sternal wound closure over the past 10 years. Major wound complications, which were categorized into two groups, required in-hospital management and operative intervention. Group 1 had a sternal dehiscence alone. Group II had a major sternal infection or mediastinitis. RESULTS: The incidence of wound morbidity was 2.4% (n = 25). There were 6 (0.58%) sternal dehiscences (Group I) and 19 (1.8%) sternal wound infections (Group II). Patients taken to the operating room for repair of their sternal dehiscence or sternal infection were noted to have two completely intact sternal halves. CONCLUSIONS: While wound related morbidity with Mersilene tape closure is equivalent to the historical results of conventional wire closure, dehiscence occurs in a more controlled fashion with less bony destruction. The reduction in tissue damage associated with sternal wound dehiscence and sternal infection after Mersilene-reinforced sternal wound closure makes treatment of these potentially devastating complications easier and more efficient.     

Surgical technique for closure of difficult abdomen

Abdominal dehiscence reported to occur with a frequency of one per cent even under the best circumstances, is a dreaded complication. Closure of the dehisced abdominal wall under adverse conditions like local infection and wound edge retraction may be difficult. We describe a new technique which is a modification of classical retention sutures for the abdominal wall closure.     

Surgical Technique for Closure of Difficult Abdomen

Abdominal dehiscence reported to occur with a frequency of one per cent even under the best circumstances, is a dreaded complication. Closure of the dehisced abdominal wall under adverse conditions like local infection and wound edge retraction may be difficult. We describe a new technique which is a modification of classical retention sutures for the abdominal wall closure.     

Addition of Rectus Sheath Relaxation Incisions to Emergency Midline Laparotomy for Peritonitis to prevent Fascial Dehiscence

The incidence of fascial dehiscence and incisional hernia after two methods for abdominal wound closure (rectus sheath relaxation incisions and conventional mass closure) was studied in a randomized prospective clinical trial in a consecutive series of 100 patients undergoing midline laparotomy for peritonitis. The two groups were well matched for etiologies of peritonitis, the surgical procedures performed, and the presence of known risk factors for fascial dehiscence. Fifty patients each were randomized either to the conventional continuous mass closure procedure or the rectus sheath relaxation incision technique (designed to increase wound elasticity and decrease tension in the suture line) using identical polypropylene sutures. The incidence of postoperative complications such as duration of ileus, chest infection, and wound infection were not statistically different between the two groups. The intensity of postoperative pain in the rectus sheath relaxation incision group was significantly less. The incidence of wound hematoma was significantly increased in the rectus sheath relaxation incision group. The incidences of fascial dehiscence (16% vs,28%; p < 0.05) and incisional hernia (18% vs, 30%; p < 0.05) were significantly lower after rectus sheath relaxation incisions compared to conventional mass closure. Closure of the midline laparotomy wound in cases of peritonitis using the rectus sheath relaxation technique is safe and less painful, provides increased wound elasticity and decreased tension on the suture line, and significantly decreases the incidence of wound dehiscence.     

New transverse plate fixation system for complicated sternal wound infection after median sternotomy

Wire fixation after median sternotomy is a safe procedure, but it is still associated with potential wound infection including bony dehiscence. In case of infection and dehiscence the sternum is re-fixated with steel wires. If this is insufficient, then flap reconstruction would be another option. We describe an alternative way for complicated sternal closure by using a rigid sternal fixation system that is feasible for cardiac surgeons. Three patients suffering from sternal instability and infection were operated on with the new titanium plates. The procedures were uneventful and short-term follow-up showed stable sternal conditions. In this report the technical concept has been described in detail in 1 patient. This new sternal fixation technique is safe and easy to handle and broadens the spectrum for closure of complicated sternal wound infections or dehiscence.     

Aseptic surgical preparation for upper eyelid blepharoplasty via full‐face octenidine antiseptic without antibiotic medication shows effective prophylaxis against post‐surgical wound infection

Blepharoplasty is the third most common plastic surgical procedure in the USA. Due to the emergence of multiresistant bacteria, optimising the antiseptic procedure is crucial. Choice of antiseptics plays an important role as they may cause skin irritation and colouring of disinfected areas. In this study, the use of the aqueous antiseptic octenisept^® (octenidine) was evaluated in the outcome of blepharoplasties: incidence of wound dehiscence; haematoma; and infection in correlation with gender, medication, smoking habits and time of year. This retrospective surveillance study included 352 patients (median age 58·3 years). Skin disinfection was performed thrice prior to blepharoplasty. Sutures were removed on day 6. None of the patients suffered from wound infection. The total rate of wound dehiscence was 6·3%, with a higher ratio among male patients. Smokers and patients on anticoagulant medication showed a significantly higher incidence of wound dehiscence. Throughout the year, rates of wound dehiscence were highest in summer. Aseptic surgical preparation for blepharoplasty via full‐face scrub with octenisept^® without oral antibiotic prophylaxis is well tolerated, with no report of wound infection, which may improve antibiotic stewardship as well as patient comfort. Elective upper eyelid blepharoplasty may ideally be performed in winter.     

Negative pressure wound therapy reduces incidence of postoperative wound infection and dehiscence after long-segment thoracolumbar spinal fusion: a single institutional experience

Background contextWound dehiscence and surgical site infections (SSIs) can have a profound impact on patients as they often require hospital readmission, additional surgical interventions, lengthy intravenous antibiotic administration, and delayed rehabilitation. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) exposes the wound site to negative pressure, resulting in the improvement of blood supply, removal of excess fluid, and stimulation of cellular proliferation of granulation tissue.PurposeTo assess the incidence of wound infection and dehiscence in patients undergoing long-segment thoracolumbar fusion before and after the routine use of NPWT.Study designRetrospective study.Patient sampleOne hundred sixty patients undergoing long-segment thoracolumbar spine fusions were included in this study.Outcome measuresPostoperative incidence of wound infection and dehiscence.MethodsAll adult patients undergoing thoracolumbar fusion for spinal deformity over a 6-year period at Duke University Medical Center by the senior author (CB) were included in this study. In 2012, a categorical change was made by the senior author (CB) that included the postoperative routine use of incisional NPWT devices after primary wound closure in all long-segment spine fusions. Before 2012, NPWT was not used. After primary wound closure, a negative pressure device is contoured to the size of the incision and placed over the incision site for 3 postoperative days. We retrospectively review the first 46 cases in which NPWT was used and compared them with the immediately preceding 114 cases to assess the incidence of wound infection and dehiscence.ResultsOne hundred sixty (NPWT: 46 cases, non-NPWT: 114 cases) long-segment thoracolumbar spine fusions were performed for deformity correction. Baseline characteristics were similar between both cohorts. Compared with the non-NPWT cohort, a 50% decrease in the incidence of wound dehiscence was observed in the NPWT patient cohort (6.38% vs. 12.28%, p=.02). Similarly, compared with the non-NPWT cohort, the incidence of postoperative SSIs was significantly decreased in the NPWT cohort (10.63% vs. 14.91%, p=.04).ConclusionsRoutine use of incisional NPWT was associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of postoperative wound infection and dehiscence.     

Fracture and herniation of bowel at bone graft donor site in the iliac crest

Fracture at a bone graft donor site in the iliac crest is an uncommon but documented occurrence. Herniation at this site requires a deep dehiscence of the wound, and is rare. A patient is reported with complete wound dehiscence in association with a fracture at a bone graft donor site in the iliac crest.     

Wound dehiscence in urological patients.

The causes of wound dehiscence in urological patients are discussed. In 576 patients undergoing 672 consecutive transperitoneal urological operations there were 9 instances of complete dehiscence (1.3%). All 9 cases involved male patients. Postoperative abdominal distnsion, wound infection, enterocutaneous fistula and simple layered closure with chromic catgut were associated with an increased incidence of dehiscence.     

Use of synthetic absorbable sutures for abdominal and chest wound closure. Experience with 650 consecutive cases.

The advent of synthetic collagen suture (polyglycolic acid and polyglacin 910) has provided a new dimension in surgical suturing. However, surgeons in general have not yet taken full advantage of the potential that this new material offers. Associated evisceration and wound dehiscence rates as well as the incidence rate of wound infection were assessed since these represent standards by which the suture material can be evaluated. In an entire series of 650 cases, there has been one case of wound dehiscence with evisceration. The incidence of infection has been less than 1%, which is comparable to previous experience with interrupted, nonabsorbable sutures. The time required for closure using the new material has been approximately one third of that associated with the use of conventional interrupted closure sutures. This implies a substantial cost reduction for the patient. As a result of this experience, the synthetic absorbable sutures seem to represent the material of choice for routine abdominal or chest wound closure.     

Simple and reliable way in sternum wound coverage--tripedicle pectoralis major musculocutaneous flap

Objective: Sternotomy wound infection requires radically debridements and need secondary reconstruction of the resulting defect. Pectoralis major muscular or musculocutaneous flap is quite common in sternal wound closure. We modified the pectoralis major musculocutaneous flap design: bipedicle advancement cutaneous flap combined with thoracoacromial myocutaneous perforators, as a “tripedicle” fashion. We tried to utilize the cutaneous pedicle to provide a reliable skin coverage and decrease the wound dehiscence rate in lower one third sternal wound. Methods: Four patients undergoing median sternotomy surgery between 2004 and 2007 suffered from sternal wound infection and received tri‐pedicle pectoralis major musculocutaneous flaps transfer. Results: No skin paddle necrosis or wound dehiscence occurred in the postoperative course. Cosmetically and chest stability were satisfactory without complains about the daily activity. Conclusions: Tripedicle pectoralis major musculocutaneous flap is a simple and reliable technique to cover sternal wound defect necessitating resurfacing surgery. The blood supply to the skin paddle can be enriched by the superior and inferior cutaneous pedicle and the wound dehiscence rate is decreased with this technique. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. Microsurgery, 2008.     

Factors influencing wound dehiscence.

Thirty-one abdominal fascial wound dehiscences occurred in 2,761 patients undergoing major abdominal surgery during a 5-year period (1%). Twenty-two specific local and systemic risk factors were analyzed and compared with the risk factors of a control group of 38 patients undergoing similar procedures without dehiscence. Through multivariate analysis, each factor was assessed as an independent statistical variable. Significant factors (p less than 0.05) were found to include age over 65, wound infection, pulmonary disease, hemodynamic instability, and ostomies in the incision. Additional systemic risk factors that were found to be significant included hypoproteinemia, systemic infection, obesity, uremia, hyperalimentation, malignancy, ascites, steroid use, and hypertension. Risk factors not found to be important independent variables included sex, type of incision, type of closure, foreign body in the wound, anemia, jaundice, and diabetes. When dehiscence and control groups were combined, 30% of patients with at least five significant risk factors developed dehiscence, and all the patients with more than eight risk factors developed a wound dehiscence. There was an overall mortality of 29%, which was directly related to the number of significant risk factors. The co-existence of 9 risk factors portended death in one third of the patients, and all the patients with more than 10 risk factors died.     

冠心病搭桥术后胸骨裂开的防治(附5例报道)

目的 探讨冠心病搭桥术后胸骨裂开及其合并感染的诊断、治疗和预防。方法 未感染者及时再手术重新固定,合并感染者及时彻底清创、有效引流、牢固固定。结果 本组治愈率100％,伤口愈合时间平均10天(7～14天),1例除外。二次术后平均拔除引流管时间7.4天(2～20天)。结论 伤口局部的症状、体征、全身表现和X线胸片对诊断和治疗有重要意义。早发现、早诊断,及时重新固定,合并感染者及时彻底清创、有效引流、牢固固定是治疗成功的关键,可以有效缩短住院时间。重视胸骨裂开的预防,可减少其发生率。