Ethical Aspects of the Use of Stem Cell Derived Gametes for Reproduction

A lot of interest has been generated by the possibility of deriving gametes from embryonic stem cells and bone marrow stem cells. These stem cell derived gametes may become useful for research and for the treatment of infertility. In this article we consider prospectively the ethical issues that will arise if stem cell derived gametes are used in the clinic, making a distinction between concerns that only apply to embryonic stem cell derived gametes and concerns that are also relevant for gametes derived from adult stem cells. At present, it appears preferable to use non-embryonic stem cells for the derivation of gametes. Adult stem cell derived gametes do not present any problems with regard to the moral status of the human embryo, bypass the safety risks linked to SCNT and do not present any ambiguity or novel problems with regard to informed consent, psychological consequences for the child or genetic parenthood. A remaining ethical concern, however, regards the safety of the procedure in terms of the welfare of the resulting children. This should spark a thorough reflection on how far one must go to accommodate a person’s wish to have a genetically related child.     

Bioethische und sozialethische Probleme bei der Verwendung von Geweben aus humanen embryonalen Stammzellen sowie der Aufbewahrung von Stammzellen aus dem Nabelschnurblut durch private Firmen zum autologen Gebrauch

The regulation of the European Council and Parliament on advanced therapy medicinal products also includes therapies with human embryonic stem cells. The use of these stem cells is controversially and heavily discussed. Contrary to the use of adult stem cells, medical and ethical problems concerning the use of human embryonic stem cells persists, because this use is based on the destruction of human life at the very beginning. The regulation forsees, therefore, subsidiarity within the European Member States. Although there are no ethical problems in principle with the use of stem cells from the umbilical cord blood, there are social ethical doubts with the banking of these stem cells for autologous use without any currently foreseeable medical advantage by commercial blood banks. Also in this case subsidiarity is valid.     

Some ethical aspects of donation and transplantation

Ethical and legal consensus in our country bases the practice of donations and transplants on different ethical principles, which are contained in the legislation, closely conforming to the four principles of principialist bioethics: autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice. The level of donations achieved in our milieu might, in fact, be related to a strict respect for these principles by the health professionals, as well as to the excellent organisation of the transplant world. Many scientific, technical and ethical challenges have had to be met to reach the present state of the transplant. And there are many current challenges. The article only analyses some of these due to their technical, ethical and social repercussions: organ transplants involving a live donor, the public request for organs, the organ market, the transplant of non-vital organs (basically the face transplant), the use of stem cells and the banks of umbilical cord cells. The aim of the article is to state the ethical problems raised by these new practices, in order to lay the foundations for a moral deliberation that must necessarily involve the whole of society.     

人胚胎干细胞建系研究中的伦理管理

目的：建立国人胚胎干细胞系递交国际干细胞库,并在此基础上建立既符合中国国情又得到国际认可的相关伦理管理体系。方法：在比尔盖茨基金会的资助下,与北京大学生命科学院再生生物学实验室合作,募集胚胎建立人胚胎干细胞系,在此过程中探讨可行的符合国际伦理原则的相关伦理管理机制。结果：成功建立了国人胚胎干细胞系及相关伦理管理体系。结论：进行干细胞研究时应充分重视伦理问题,国际干细胞伦理管理与中国相关伦理原则是可以有机结合的。     

人胚胎干细胞建系研究中的伦理管理

目的：建立国人胚胎干细胞系递交国际干细胞库,并在此基础上建立既符合中国国情又得到国际认可的相关伦理管理体系。方法：在比尔盖茨基金会的资助下,与北京大学生命科学院再生生物学实验室合作,募集胚胎建立人胚胎干细胞系,在此过程中探讨可行的符合国际伦理原则的相关伦理管理机制。结果：成功建立了国人胚胎干细胞系及相关伦理管理体系。结论：进行干细胞研究时应充分重视伦理问题,国际干细胞伦理管理与中国相关伦理原则是可以有机结合的。     

Banking on it: public policy and the ethics of stem cell research and development

If the therapeutic potential of stem cell-based therapies is ever realized, demand for stem cells and derivative tissues will be tremendous and will create new challenges for health care systems, especially publicly funded health care systems. We propose a framework for the ethical analysis of stem cell research and development that considers the welfare of communities, tissue recipients, and cell sources in relation to a range of stem cell production and distribution options. Ethical desiderata include: equitable access, maximized potential therapeutic benefit across demographic and disease groups, and reasonable cost. Other ethical priorities include the minimization of stem cell line and tissue wastage, risk of immune rejection, risk of transmitting diseases, the use of human embryos, and risk to those contributing source cells. We array plausible sources of stem cells and distribution strategies to characterize 12 potential models for producing and distributing cells and tissues in the future. We describe "personalized", "matched", and "universalized" models, and compare the ethical acceptability of these models. Popular and scientific discourses about stem cells typically emphasize personalized or matched stem cell distribution models. We show that universalized models may ultimately best serve the interest of taxpayers, communities and patients who hold high stakes in the therapeutic success of stem cell science. They are therefore highly worthy of scientific pursuit. This conclusion is provisional and the framework must be reapplied as scientific knowledge, technological capacity and ethical mores evolve.     

Ethical boundary-work in the embryonic stem cell laboratory

Most accounts of the ethics of stem cell research are de- contextualised reviews of the ethical and legal literature. In this chapter we present a socially embedded account of some of the ethical implications of stem cell research, from the perspectives of scientists directly involved in this area. Based on an ethnography of two leading embryonic stem cell laboratories in the UK, our data form part of the findings from a larger project mapping the scientific, medical, social and ethical dimensions of innovative stem cell treatment, focusing on the areas of liver cell and pancreatic islet cell transplantation. We explore three key issues: what individual scientists themselves view as ethical sources of human embryos and stem cells; their perceptions of human embryos and stem cells; and how scientists perceive regulatory frameworks in stem cell research. We argue that these dimensions of laboratory practice are all examples of 'ethical boundary-work', which is becoming an integral part of the routine practice and performance of biomedical science. Our work adds to the relatively few sociological studies that explore ethics in clinical settings and to an even smaller body of work that explores scientists' views on the ethical issues relating to their research.     

Differentiation of embryonic and adult stem cells into insulin producing cells

Replacement of insulin producing cells represents an almost ideal treatment for patients with diabetes mellitus type 1. Transplantation of pancreatic islets of Langerhans is successful in experienced centers. The wider application of this therapy, however, is limited by the lack of donor organs. Insulin producing cells generated from stem cells represent an attractive alternative. Stem cells with the potential to differentiate into insulin producing cells include embryonic stem cells (ESC) as well as adult stem cells from various tissues including the pancreas, liver, bone marrow and adipose tissue. The use of human ESC is hampered by ethical concerns but research with human ESC may help us to decipher important steps in the differentiation process in vitro since almost all information available on pancreas development are based on animal studies. The present review summarizes the current knowledge on the development of insulin producing cells from embryonic and adult stem cells with special emphasis on pancreatic, hepatic and human mesenchymal stem cells.     

Stem cell sources for cardiac regeneration

Cell-based cardiac repair has the ambitious aim to replace the malfunctioning cardiac muscle developed after myocardial infarction, with new contractile cardiomyocytes and vessels. Different stem cell populations have been intensively studied in the last decade as a potential source of new cardiomyocytes to ameliorate the injured myocardium, compensate for the loss of ventricular mass and contractility and eventually restore cardiac function. An array of cell types has been explored in this respect, including skeletal muscle, bone marrow derived stem cells, embryonic stem cells (ESC) and more recently cardiac progenitor cells. The best-studied cell types are mouse and human ESC cells, which have undisputedly been demonstrated to differentiate into cardiomyocyte and vascular lineages and have been of great help to understand the differentiation process of pluripotent cells. However, due to their immunogenicity, risk of tumor development and the ethical challenge arising from their embryonic origin, they do not provide a suitable cell source for a regenerative therapy approach. A better option, overcoming ethical and allogenicity problems, seems to be provided by bone marrow derived cells and by the recently identified cardiac precursors. This report will overview current knowledge on these different cell types and their application in cardiac regeneration and address issues like implementation of delivery methods, including tissue engineering approaches that need to be developed alongside.     

Stem cell strategies for Alzheimer's disease therapy

We have found much evidence that the brain is capable of regenerating neurons after maturation. In our previous study, human neural stem cells (HNSCs) transplanted into aged rat brains differentiated into neural cells and significantly improved the cognitive functions of the animals, indicating that HNSCs may be a promising candidate for cell-replacement therapies for neurodegenerative diseases including Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, ethical and practical issues associated with HNSCs compel us to explore alternative strategies. Here, we report novel technologies to differentiate adult human mesenchymal stem cells, a subset of stromal cells in the bone marrow, into neural cells by modifying DNA methylation or over expression of nanog, a homeobox gene expressed in embryonic stem cells. We also report peripheral administrations of a pyrimidine derivative that increases endogenous stem cell proliferation improves cognitive function of the aged animal. Although these results may promise a bright future for clinical applications used towards stem cell strategies in AD therapy, we must acknowledge the complexity of AD. We found that glial differentiation takes place in stem cells transplanted into amyloid-( precursor protein (APP) transgenic mice. We also found that over expression of APP gene or recombinant APP treatment causes glial differentiation of stem cells. Although further detailed mechanistic studies may be required, RNA interference of APP or reduction of APP levels in the brain can significantly reduced glial differentiation of stem cells and may be useful in promoting neurogenesis after stem cell transplantation.     

The importance of the use of stem cells for public health

Stem cells were elected 'Breakthrough of the Year' by Science(1) magazine in 1999, having shown that stem cells from adult tissues retained the ability to differentiate into other tissue types. During the previous year, the first human embryo stem cell lines were established. Since then, the number of scientific papers on stem cells has been increasing exponentially, establishing new paradigms that are rapidly challenged by subsequent experiments. This paper reviews the stem cell research field, divided into two groups: embryo and adult stem cells. While the differentiation potential of the former is well characterized in mice and humans, their use in cell therapy and research has been hampered by histocompatibility, safety and ethical issues. In contrast, adult stem cells do not present these problems. However, the extent of their plasticity is still under investigation. Nevertheless, numerous clinical trials in humans are under way, mainly with stem cells derived from bone marrow. This paper discusses discuss the importance of working with both classes of human stem cells in order to fulfill the promise of stem cell therapies.     

Nontraditional sources of pluripotent stem cells: a new chapter in the debate about embryonic stem cell research

Recent efforts to resolve the political impasse over human embryonic stem cells (ESC) have generated proposals for obtaining ESC while avoiding the destruction of human embryos. This new chapter in the scientific and ethical debate provides an important opportunity to introduce additional ethical considerations to enhance public discourse.     

Stem cell research: licit or complicit? Is a medical breakthrough based on embryonic and fetal tissue compatible with Catholic teaching?

In November 1998 biologists announced that they had discovered a way to isolate and preserve human stem cells. Since stem cells are capable of developing into any kind of human tissue or organ, this was a great scientific coup. Researchers envision using the cells to replace damaged organs and to restore tissue destroyed by, for example, Parkinson's disease, diabetes, or even Alzheimer's. But, since stem cells are taken from aborted embryonic and fetal tissue or "leftover" in vitro embryos, their use raises large ethical issues. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) recently decided to fund research employing, not stem cells, but "cell lines" derived from them. The NIH has essentially made an ethical determination, finding sufficient "distance" between cell lines and abortion. Can Catholic universities sponsoring biological research agree with this finding? Probably not. In Catholic teaching, the concept of "complicity" would likely preclude such research. However, Catholic teaching would probably allow research done with stem cells obtained from postpartum placental tissue and from adult bone marrow and tissue. These cells, which lack the pluripotency of embryonic and fetal stem cells, are nevertheless scientifically promising and do not involve the destruction of human life.     

Humane embryonale Stammzellen im Kontext internationaler Forschungsaktivitäten

Research involving pluripotent human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) is a rapidly growing field of science. Since hESCs originate from early human embryos, alternative methods for producing pluripotent cells have been developed. This article introduces some of those strategies and, in addition, covers international efforts to establish consistent international standards for cultivation, characterization and preservation of hESCs. Furthermore, global trends to form networks in the field of stem cell research as well as endeavors to harmonize ethical standards for hESC research are presented. Finally, potential applications of hESCs in the field of pharmacology/toxicology are discussed as well as recent results of animal studies using hESCs.     

A European discussion about stem cells for therapeutic use

Stem cells as a source material for growing cellular transplants to repair dysfunctional organs appear to be a new challenge for medical science. Though stem cells are also present in foetal and adult organs, embryonic stem cells from the pre-implantation embryo in particular have the potency to proliferate easily in vitro and the capacity to differentiate into all the body's organ-specific cells. Therefore, these are the ideal cells for developing new cell transplantation therapies for diseases such as Parkinson's disease, diabetes mellitus and heart failure. The use of spare in vitro fertilization (IVF) embryos or pre-implantation embryos specially created to harvest human embryonic stem cells is, however, controversial and an ethical problem. In a European discussion platform organised by the European Commission Research Directorate-General, the status quo of the progress was presented and subsequently commented upon and discussed in terms of medical-ethical, social, industrial and patient interests. The expectations of this new medical technology were high, but clinical trials seem only acceptable once the in vitro differentiation of stem cells can be adequately controlled and once it is known how in vitro prepared stem cells behave after implantation. The ethical justification of the use of in vitro pre-implantation embryos remains controversial. The prevailing view is that the interests of severely ill patients for whom no adequate therapy exists, surmounts the interest of protection of a human in vitro pre-implantation embryo, regardless of whether it was the result of IVF or of transplantation of a somatic cell nucleus of the patient in an enucleated donor egg cell (therapeutic cloning).     

Die Kriterien der Hochrangigkeit, der hinreichenden Vorklärung und der „Alternativlosigkeit“ nach § 5 Stammzellgesetz aus ethischer Sicht

The German Stem Cell Act forbids, in principle, the importation und use of human embryonic stem cells, but provides for exceptions under specific conditions. It is the first Federal German law that grants an ethical review authority over the approval process. The legislature has indeed established the criteria for the work of the members of the "Central Ethics Commission for Stem Cell Research" appointed by the Federal Government. The three criteria include the following: 'high priority of the research goals', sufficiencyy of research in the animal and adult human models' and 'the absence of an alternative'. Together they legitimate the importation and use of human embryonic stem cells. This paper seeks to elucidate these three criteria, to analyze their dual function as ethical and as scientific concepts, and to illustrate the ways in which they are being used.     

干细胞研究进展及相关伦理学问题思考

始于上世纪末,迄今仍方兴未艾的干细胞研究,由于其特殊的细胞分化,组织再生,甚至可能的器官再造特性,引起了又一次生物医学革命,被视为20世纪末最重要的生物医学成就。但同时由于胚胎干细胞涉及的人类胚胎生命及组织、器官的再生成等伦理学问题,干细胞研究从问世的第一天起,就在生物医学家、哲学家、法学家、政治家间引起广泛的争论。文章简要复习了近年来干细胞研究成果及干细胞研究引起的相关伦理学争论,并就干细胞研究引发的伦理学问题及对未来医疗发展的影响提出作者的观点。     

From fibroblasts and stem cells: implications for cell therapies and somatic cloning

Pluripotent embryonic stem cells (ESCs) from the inner cell mass of early murine and human embryos exhibit extensive self-renewal in culture and maintain their ability to differentiate into all cell lineages. These features make ESCs a suitable candidate for cell-replacement therapy. However, the use of early embryos has provoked considerable public debate based on ethical considerations. From this standpoint, stem cells derived from adult tissues are a more easily accepted alternative. Recent results suggest that adult stem cells have a broader range of potency than imagined initially. Although some claims have been called into question by the discovery that fusion between the stem cells and differentiated cells can occur spontaneously, in other cases somatic stem cells have been induced to commit to various lineages by the extra- or intracellular environment. Recent data from our laboratory suggest that changes in culture conditions can expand a subpopulation of cells with a pluripotent phenotype from primary fibroblast cultures. The present paper critically reviews recent data on the potency of somatic stem cells, methods to modify the potency of somatic cells and implications for cell-based therapies.     

诱导多潜能性干细胞的研究现状与临床应用前景

胚胎干细胞可作为细胞替代治疗中很好的供体细胞来源。但由于伦理学的原因,限制了胚胎干细胞在细胞替代治疗中的应用前景,而诱导多潜能性干细胞(induced pluripotent stem cell,iPS细胞)的出现则提供了一种替代胚胎干细胞的多潜能性细胞。因为iPS细胞的建立不需要卵细胞,也不破坏发育中的胚胎,所以iPS细胞不涉及伦理学问题。而且iPS细胞的建立相对简单,重复性好。因此,iPS细胞在细胞替代治疗和再生医学中有着广泛的应用前景。本文将回顾iPS细胞技术发展的历史,介绍现有的建立iPS细胞的不同方法和评估iPS细胞质量的手段,展望iPS细胞在细胞替代治疗上有待解决的问题和应用前景。     

Ethics, politics, and human embryo stem cell research.

Three reports on ethical aspects of research involving human embryonic stem cells were issued in the final months of 1999. Two were from governmental agencies or commissions: the National Institutes of Health and the National Bioethics Advisory Commission. The third report was issued by the American Association for the Advancement of Science and the Institute for Civil Society. All three reports endorse the use of federal funds for embryonic stem cell research, but other differences distinguish these reports. This article describes the differences and provides an ethical analysis of the main arguments.