Spinal cord injury in Italy: A multicenter retrospective study

OBJECTIVE: To investigate certain factors influencing the length of stay (LOS) in a rehabilitation center, the incidence of pressure ulcers, and the neurologic improvement of patients with traumatic (T/SCI) and nontraumatic spinal cord injury (NT/SCI). DESIGN: A multicenter retrospective study of patients with SCI admitted to rehabilitation centers between 1 January 1989 and 31 December 1994 (only first admissions). SETTING: Seven Italian rehabilitation centers. PATIENTS: A total of 859 consecutively admitted adult patients with SCI. INTERVENTION: Examined medical records of patients admitted to rehabilitation centers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pressure ulcers on admission as an indicator of nursing care in acute phase, LOS in rehabilitation centers, and neurologic improvement on discharge (using the Frankel classification system). Other measures included level of lesion, associated lesions (if T/SCI), surgical stabilization (if T/SCI), and time from the event to admission to a rehabilitation center. RESULTS: In all cases, the time from event to admission to a rehabilitation center exceeded 30 days (average +/- standard deviation: T/SCI, 54.6 +/- 43.7d; NT/SCI, 166.9 +/- 574d); pressure ulcers on admission were present in 34.1% of T/SCI and 17.1% of NT/SCI patients. The average LOS in a rehabilitation center was 143.1 +/- 89.1 days for T/SCI and 91.7 +/- 78.9 days for NT/SCI; Frankel grades improved by 1 or more in 34.4% of T/SCI and 34.1% of NT/SCI patients. The presence of pressure ulcers on admission, rehabilitation LOS, and neurologic improvement on discharge correlated highly with severe neurologic damage on admission in both T/SCI and NT/SCI patients as well as with management of the patient immediately before admission to a rehabilitation center, mainly in NT/SCI patients. CONCLUSIONS: Severe neurologic damage is the major determining factor in predicting neurologic recovery. Pressure ulcer prevention is statistically associated with neurologic improvement and the shortening of rehabilitation LOS. Patient management immediately before admission to rehabilitation has a statistical correlation with neurologic improvement in all patients studied and on both rehabilitation LOS and incidence of pressure ulcers in the NT/SCI patients.     

Rehabilitation outcomes after infection-related spinal cord disease: a retrospective analysis

OBJECTIVES: To compare injury characteristics, demographics, and functional outcomes of patients with infection-related spinal cord disease (IR-SCD) vs. those with traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). DESIGN: A 10-yr retrospective review of 34 consecutive patients with IR-SCD admitted to an SCI rehabilitation unit at a Level 1 tertiary university medical center. Outcome measures included length of stay (LOS), FIM motor scores, and home discharge rates. RESULTS: The cause of IR-SCD was most often spinal epidural abscess secondary to Staphylococcus aureus (74%). Weakness (90%) and neck/back pain (84%) were the most frequent initial admitting symptoms. Identifiable risk factors included history of recent infection (42%), diabetes mellitus (32%), and intravenous drug abuse (26%). SCD-related complications most commonly included pain (81%), urinary tract infection (52%), and spasticity (45%). When compared with traumatic SCI (n = 560), patients with IR-SCD comprised significantly less of the SCI/D rehabilitation admissions (3% vs. 61%), were older (53 vs. 40 yrs), and more often female (35% vs. 16%). Injuries were more commonly located in the thoracic region (48% vs. 38%). Patients with IR-SCD more often had incomplete injuries (94% vs. 57%). Thirty-two percent of IR-SCD patients had improvements in AIS impairment scale classification. LOS was longer on acute care (25 vs. 16 days), but similar on rehabilitation (36 vs. 34 days), and with lower FIM motor changes (16.2 vs. 22.8) during rehabilitation. Patients with IR-SCD were less often discharged to home (56% vs. 75%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with infection-related SCD comprise a significant subset of SCI/D rehabilitation admissions and have differing demographic and injury characteristics compared with traumatic SCI. Despite less-severe injury characteristics and similar rehabilitation LOS, they achieve lower functional improvements and are less often discharged home, underscoring the importance of patient/family education and discharge planning.     

Nontraumatic spinal cord injury rehabilitation: pressure ulcer patterns, prediction, and impact

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the characteristics, predictors, and consequences of pressure ulcers in patients with nontraumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). DESIGN: Retrospective, 3-year, case series. SETTING: Tertiary medical unit specializing in SCI rehabilitation. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive sample of 134 adult inpatient referrals with nontraumatic SCI. Patients requiring initial rehabilitation or readmission were included. INTERVENTION: Chart review. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome measures were presence of pressure ulcers on admission to rehabilitation, incidence of new pressure ulcers developing during hospitalization, and any complications attributable to pressure ulcers during inpatient rehabilitation. Secondary objectives were to examine the predictability of risk factors for pressure ulcers, to assess the usefulness of a model previously developed for predicting pressure ulcers in patients with chronic SCI, and to estimate the effect of pressure ulcers on rehabilitation of nontraumatic SCI. RESULTS: Prevalence of pressure ulcers among admissions was 31.3% (n=42). Only 2.2% (n=3) of patients developed a new pressure ulcer after admission. The length of stay (LOS) of patients admitted with a pressure ulcer was significantly longer than that of those without a pressure ulcer (geometric mean, 62.3 d for pressure ulcer vs 28.2 d for no pressure ulcer, P=.0001). Many previously identified risk factors for pressure ulcers in SCI patients did not apply to our nontraumatic SCI patients. It is estimated that the inpatient LOS for those patients with a significant pressure ulcer was increased by 42 days. CONCLUSIONS: Pressure ulcers are a common complication for people with nontraumatic SCI who are admitted for rehabilitation, and they have a significant impact on LOS.     

An Italian survey of traumatic spinal cord injury. The Gruppo Italiano Studio Epidemiologico Mielolesioni study

OBJECTIVE: To describe the etiology, clinical presentation, complications, outcome indicators, and links between emergency and acute intervention and rehabilitation of patients with traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). DESIGN: Multicenter prospective study involving patients with SCI discharged, after rehabilitative care, between February 1, 1997, and January 31, 1999. SETTING: Thirty-two Italian hospitals involved in SCI rehabilitation. PARTICIPANTS: Six hundred eighty-four patients with traumatic SCI on their first admission to a rehabilitation center. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Neurologic improvement (NI), bladder autonomy, feelings of dependency, and destination were evaluated on discharge. Pressure ulcers on admission, time from injury to admission, and length of stay (LOS) were considered as indirect measures of the effectiveness of the health system. RESULTS: Traumatic etiology had a male-to-female ratio of 4:1 (548:136). Collision on the road was the main cause of traumatic injury (53.8%). Mean time from injury to admission was 36.8 days; 126 patients (18%) were admitted within the first week after injury. Mean LOS was 135.5 days. In 184 patients (26.9%), a pressure ulcer was present on admission. On discharge, NI was recorded in 179 patients (26.2%), whereas 446 (65%) and 418 (61%) had bladder and bowel autonomy, respectively, and 560 (81.9%) returned home. In the multivariate analysis, independent variables predicting poor outcome (NI, feelings of dependency, sphincter autonomy, discharge to home, LOS) were related both to the lesion (completeness, cervical involvement) and to the indicators of health service organization (time from injury to admission, complications on admission and during stay). CONCLUSIONS: Our focus on the etiology of traumatic SCI showed that efforts should be made to prevent collisions on the road. Our study also highlights problems in the comprehensive management of patients with SCI in Italy. Better organization could help reduce the time from injury to admission, the number of complications on admission, and LOS, and it could help improve rehabilitation outcome.     

Course of functional improvement after stroke, spinal cord injury, and traumatic brain injury.

OBJECTIVE: To examine functional improvement patterns of persons with stroke, traumatic brain injury (TBI), and spinal cord injury (SCI). DESIGN: Statistical analysis of data from a multisite study evaluating rehabilitation outcomes. SETTING: Eight inpatient rehabilitation facilities. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 314 consecutive admissions of persons with stroke, SCI, and TBI who received acute medical rehabilitation between 1994 and 1998. INTERVENTION: Calibration of motor and cognitive items from the FIM instrument, grouping of cases by number of weeks of rehabilitation (length of stay [LOS] groups), and plotting of weekly averages across time. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Weekly motor and cognitive functional status. RESULTS: With the exception of cognitive functioning for persons with SCI, LOS was related to initial functional status, with patients with greater disability having longer LOS (eg, initial motor status for persons with stroke was 48.3 for those with a 2-week stay, 36.8 for a 6-week stay, with the averages between decreasing monotonically). With the exception of cognitive gains for person with TBIs, the amount of functional gain during rehabilitation was essentially the same for all LOS groups (eg, the overall average total motor gain for persons with SCI is 22.3, with no patterns of increase or decrease across LOS groups); however, the rate of improvement in motor (but not cognitive) functioning differed across LOS groups, with patients with shorter stays having the greater rates of improvement (eg, the overall average weekly motor gain for persons with SCI was 3.6, with the averages by LOS group monotonically decreasing from 6.4 for those with 4-week stays to 2.7 for those with 9-week stays). CONCLUSIONS: When examined separately for persons grouped by LOS, functional status improved linearly during the rehabilitation stay, with differences in rate of improvement depending on initial functional status.     

Neoplastic versus traumatic spinal cord injury: an outcome comparison after inpatient rehabilitation.

OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes of patients with neoplastic spinal cord compression (SCC) to outcomes of patients with traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) after inpatient rehabilitation. DESIGN: A comparison between patients with a diagnosis of neoplastic SCC admitted to an SCI rehabilitation unit and patients with a diagnosis of traumatic SCI admitted to the regional Model Spinal Cord Injury Centers over a 5-year period, controlling for age, neurologic level of injury, and American Spinal Injury Association impairment classification. SETTING: Tertiary university medical centers. PATIENTS: Twenty-nine patients with neoplastic SCC and 29 patients with SCI of traumatic etiology who met standard rehabilitation admission criteria. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Acute and rehabilitation hospital length of stay (LOS), Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores, FIM change, FIM efficiency, and discharge rates to home. RESULTS: Patients with neoplastic SCC had a significantly (p < .01) shorter rehabilitation LOS than those with traumatic SCI (25.17 vs 57.46 days). No statistical significance was found in acute care LOS. Motor FIM scores on admission were higher in the neoplastic group, but discharge FIM scores and FIM change were significantly lower. Both groups had similar FIM efficiencies and community discharges. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with neoplastic SCC can achieve rates of functional gain comparable to those of their counterparts with traumatic SCI. While patients with traumatic SCI achieve greater functional improvement, patients with neoplastic SCC have a shorter rehabilitation LOS and can achieve comparable success with discharge to the community.     

Rehospitalization after initial rehabilitation for acute spinal cord injury: incidence and risk factors

Many acute spinal cord injury (SCI) patients require rehospitalization after discharge from initial rehabilitation. Previous studies of rehospitalization for these patients have been cross-sectional with respect to time since injury (in years), and have not allowed for comparison of patients with equal exposure to the risk of medical complications once they have reentered the community. To examine the incidence, cause, and monetary cost of rehospitalizations during the first year after discharge from initial rehabilitative care (day 365), the medical records of 88 consecutive, acute SCI patients who completed initial rehabilitation at a regional model SCI care system were reviewed. Cases were excluded from the study if the patient was lost to follow-up before day 365. All readmissions to the regional SCI care system during the follow-up period were reviewed for primary diagnosis, length of stay (LOS), and hospital charges incurred. Thirty-four patients (39%) were readmitted at least once by day 365. There was a total of 47 readmissions; mean LOS was 11.9 +/- 2.1 days per admission (+/- 1SE), and mean hospital charge per admission was $9,683. Univariate comparisons between the characteristics of patients who were readmitted vs those who were not indicated that the readmitted group was less educated (11.8 +/- 2.1 years vs 12.9 +/- 0.3 years, p less than 0.05) and had a substantially longer initial rehabilitation LOS (88.9 +/- 6.6 days vs 72.9 +/- 5.1 days, p less than 0.05). Readmissions were less common among patients who were discharged at Frankel class C or D (p less than 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Reasons for rehospitalization in patients with spinal cord injury: 5 years' experience

The aim of this study was to determine the causes of rehospitalization in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) treated in Istanbul Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Centre and to compare the data with previous studies. Patients who were rehospitalized after an initial phase of rehabilitation between 1 January 1996 and 31 December 2001 were enrolled into the study. SCI patients aged 17 years or over at the time of injury were included. This retrospective study was designed using our medical records. In 5 years, 733 SCI patients were treated and 56 of them experienced rehospitalization. We examined the demographic and injury characteristics of rehospitalized patients with SCI. The SPSS computer programme was used for statistical analysis. We found that the rate of rehospitalization was 7.6%, the length of stay (LOS) was 72.21 days and the average age was 34.25 years. The reasons for rehospitalization were, in descending order, spasticity 25%, additional rehabilitation 21.4%, pressure sores 17.9%, urinary infection 16.1%, spinal surgery 8.9%, urinary system surgery 5.4% and pain 5.4%. Statistical significance was found between mean age and causes. The patients who were rehospitalized because of spinal surgery had a lower mean age than those rehospitalized because of pain (P=0.04, F=2.4). The most frequent reasons for rehospitalization of patients over 25 years old were spasticity and pressure sores. In conclusion, SCI patients' LOS was longer than found in previous studies because of a lack of efficient home rehabilitation. The most frequent cause of rehospitalization was spasticity, because of uncontrolled medical therapy. The study demonstrates how education of the patients and their families is important, and that home-based rehabilitation services must be established and supported by government.     

Nontraumatic spinal cord injury: an Italian survey

OBJECTIVE: To describe the demographic and clinical characteristics and the clinical course of patients with nontraumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). DESIGN: A multicenter prospective study. SETTING: Thirty-two rehabilitation centers in several Italian regions. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with nontraumatic SCI (N=330) on first admission (February 1, 1997-January 31, 1999) to rehabilitation centers. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Indicators of rehabilitation process quality were efficient bladder and bowel management. The indica-tor of neurologic recovery was improvement in American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) level at discharge. The indicator of rehabilitation outcome was return home. Length of stay (LOS) was also measured as an indicator of the care process. RESULTS: Of the 330 patients, 30% exhibited an improvement in AIS classification at discharge, and 73% returned home. In multivariate analysis, a longer LOS was associated with vascular etiology, complete lesions, residence outside the district of the rehabilitation center, and presence of clinical complications. Neurologic improvement was related to incompleteness of the lesion and longer LOS. Factors predicting a return home were married status, incompleteness of lesion, clinical improvement, efficient bowel and bladder management, absence of pressure ulcers, and longer LOS. CONCLUSIONS: Patients showed long waiting times between diagnosis and initiation of rehabilitation, a good chance of improvement on the AIS, and low rates of home returns.     

Rehabilitation outcomes of terror victims with multiple traumas

OBJECTIVES: To describe the rehabilitation outcomes of terror victims with multiple traumas, and to compare those outcomes with those of patients with nonterror-related multiple traumas treated in the same rehabilitation facility over the same time period. DESIGN: Retrospective chart reviews. SETTING: Rehabilitation department in a university hospital in Jerusalem, Israel. PARTICIPANTS: Between September 2000 and September 2004, we treated 72 victims of terrorist attacks who had multiple traumas. Among them, 47 (65%) had multiple traumas without central nervous system involvement (MT subgroup), 19 (26%) had multiple traumas with traumatic brain injury (TBI subgroup), and 6 (8%) had multiple traumas with spinal cord injury (SCI subgroup). We matched, according to their types of injury and demographic data, each terror victim with a control patient treated in the same period in our rehabilitation department. INTERVENTION: Interdisciplinary inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hospital length of stay (LOS) in acute care departments, inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation departments, functional outcome (FIM instrument score), occupational outcome (returning to previous occupation), and psychologic outcome (Solomon PTSD [post-traumatic stress disorder] Inventory). RESULTS: The mean LOS of terror victims was 218+/-131 days; for the nonterror group it was 152+/-114 days (P<.01). In comparison with the control subgroups, the MT subgroup of terrorist victims had significantly longer LOS in the acute care and outpatient rehabilitation departments (P=.06) and the terror TBI subgroup had a longer LOS in outpatient department only (P<.05). The LOS of the SCI patients, both terror victims and control patients, was significantly longer than that of the other 2 subgroups. The difference between FIM value at entry and discharge (DeltaFIM) was significantly higher for terror victims than for the controls (41.1+/-21.6 vs 30.8+/-21.8, P=.002). This difference was mainly the result of the significantly higher DeltaFIM achieved by the terror MT subgroup than by the MT controls. The rate of PTSD was higher among terror victims than among controls (40.9% vs 24.2%, P=.04). The rate of return to previous occupations was similar between terror victims and nonterror patients (53% vs 46.9%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Victims of terror spent longer periods in rehabilitation than the nonterror group; however, they regained most activity of daily living functions similar to the nonterror group. Despite the higher rate of PTSD, terror victims succeeded in returning to their previous occupations at a similar rate to that of the nonterror group.     

Functional outcomes and disability after nontraumatic spinal cord injury rehabilitation: Results from a retrospective study

OBJECTIVE: To describe, in a group of patients undergoing initial inpatient rehabilitation after nontraumatic spinal cord injury (SCI), the demographic characteristics, clinical features, and outcomes, with a focus on the functional status and disability. DESIGN: Retrospective data analysis, 3-year case series. SETTING: Tertiary medical unit specializing in nontraumatic SCI rehabilitation. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive sample of 70 adult inpatient referrals with nontraumatic SCI undergoing initial inpatient rehabilitation. INTERVENTION: Chart review. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were demographic characteristics, clinical features, mortality, length of stay (LOS), neurologic classification, accommodation setting, support services, mobility, bladder and bowel continence, and FIM instrument scores. RESULTS: Forty-one patients (58.6%) were paraplegic incomplete, 23 (32.9%) were tetraplegic incomplete, and 6 (8.6%) were paraplegic complete. Eight patients (11.4%) died before hospital discharge. Of those who survived, 47 (75.8%) were discharged home, 11 (17.7%) were transferred to a nursing home, and 4 (6.4%) went elsewhere in the community. The geometric mean LOS was 55.8 days. Nine patients (14.5%) were discharged walking unaided, 27 (43.5%) were walking at least 10 m with a gait aid, and 26 (41.9%) were wheelchair dependent for mobility. Thirty patients (48.4%) were voiding on sensation, 7 (11.1%) used intermittent catheterization, 23 (37.2%) had an indwelling catheter, and 2 (2.8%) used reflex voiding. Eleven patients (17.7%) were fecally continent on sensation and 47 (75.8%) were fecally continent with a bowel program, 1 patient (1.6%) had a colostomy, and 3 patients (4.8%) were discharged fecally incontinent. The mean Rasch FIM motor score was 39.6 on admission and 58.7 at discharge (paired t test, t=-11.2; P<.000). CONCLUSIONS: Most nontraumatic SCI patients returned home with a good level of functioning regarding mobility, bladder, and bowel status, in comparison to other studies of patients with SCI. Patients' disability was usually significantly reduced during rehabilitation.     

Predicting "charge outliers" after spinal cord injury: a multicenter analysis of demographics, injury characteristics, outcomes, and rehabilitation charges

OBJECTIVE: To describe the distribution of charges, to distinguish between "charge outliers" and nonoutliers, and to identify a model that uses demographics and injury characteristics to predict charge outlier status in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). DESIGN: Retrospective data analysis of patients admitted to 24 acute inpatient rehabilitation national Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems centers. Statistical analysis, including proportions, means, and standard deviations (SDs), were compiled for the following variables: demographic and injury information, rehabilitation charges, medical complications, associated injuries, and surgical procedures. SETTING: Tertiary, university medical centers participating in the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research's SCI Model Systems project. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 13,392 patients who were admitted to 24 acute, intensive, interdisciplinary rehabilitation settings after traumatic SCI between November 1972 and August 1996. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Statistical data analysis was used to determine significance between charge outliers and nonoutliers on the basis of demographic, injury characteristics, and clinical factors. Outliers, under the current diagnostic-related group system, are defined as cases in which lengths of stay exceed the mean by the lesser of 20 days or 1.94 SDs. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were found between SCI charge outliers and nonoutliers based on ethnicity, education, employment, level of injury, American Spinal Injury Association impairment classification, and sponsor of hospitalization. On average, outliers were 4 years older than nonoutliers, and tended to have more associated injuries, pressure ulcers, surgical procedures, and medical complications. A forward-conditional stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis was used to confirm univariate analysis and to predict the presence or absence of outliers based on the predictor variables. A model for the prediction of SCI charge outlier status was defined. CONCLUSIONS: SCI charge outliers are most likely to be retired, insured, have high cervical level injuries, and be educated beyond high school. Improved treatment efficiency serves as a means of cost reduction and is a reason to identify outlier characteristics.     

Paraplegia after aortic aneurysm repair versus traumatic spinal cord injury: functional outcome, complications, and therapy intensity of inpatient rehabilitation

Yokoyama O, Sakuma F, Itoh R, Sashika H. Paraplegia after aortic aneurysm repair versus traumatic spinal cord injury: functional outcome, complications, and therapy intensity of inpatient rehabilitation.

Objective

To compare outcomes, complications, and therapy intensity of inpatient rehabilitation in patients with paraplegia caused by spinal cord injury associated with aortic aneurysm repair (SCI-AA) versus patients with traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI).

Design

Case-controlled study.

Setting

SCI unit in a rehabilitation center.

Participants

Seventeen patients with SCI-AA and 17 patients with traumatic SCI.

Intervention

Standard rehabilitation therapy for SCI.

Main Outcome Measures

Length of stay (LOS) in acute and rehabilitation hospitals; FIM instrument scores; FIM change; FIM efficiency; complications; therapy intensity; and ambulatory state and return to community at discharge.

Results

No significant differences were noted in acute and rehabilitation LOS and admission FIM scores. Discharge FIM scores, FIM change, and FIM efficiencies were significantly lower in the SCI-AA group, which had many complications related to AA and SCI. Intensity of rehabilitation sports therapy in the SCI-AA group was significantly lower than that of the traumatic SCI group, but total therapy intensity did not differ significantly. Both had similar rates of return to ambulatory state and discharge to the community.

Conclusions

SCI-AA patients had many complications that interfered with rehabilitation therapy, and could not achieve functional gains comparable to those with traumatic SCI. However, both groups achieved comparable success with return to ambulatory state and discharge to the community.     

Gender-related differences in acute rehabilitation lengths of stay, charges, and functional outcomes for a matched sample with spinal cord injury: a multicenter investigation

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of gender on length of stay (LOS), treatment costs, and outcomes by using a matched sample of patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). DESIGN: A 2 x (15 x 3) mixed, block design was used retrospectively to analyze the impact of gender on subjects matched for age, American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) motor impairment classification, and level of neurologic injury. SETTING: Twenty medical centers in the federally sponsored Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems project. PARTICIPANTS: One thousand seventy-four adult patients with SCI admitted between 1988 and 1998 were assessed at acute-care admission, inpatient rehabilitation admission, and inpatient rehabilitation discharge. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: ASIA motor index and FIM instrument admission, discharge, and efficiency scores; rehabilitation LOS and medical care charges; and discharge disposition. RESULTS: Analysis revealed no gender-related differences in FIM motor scores on admission and discharge. No differences in FIM motor efficiencies or daily change were observed. No significant differences were found for ASIA motor scores on acute-care admission and rehabilitation discharge. No differences in acute rehabilitation LOS and charges were observed. No gender-related differences were seen in the likelihood of discharge to an institutional setting. CONCLUSION: Gender was not a significant factor in functional outcome of SCI patients after acute rehabilitation.     

Outcomes of early surgical management versus late or no surgical intervention after acute spinal cord injury

OBJECTIVE: To compare neurologic, medical, and functional outcomes of patients with acute spinal cord injury (SCI) undergoing early (<24 h and 24-72 h) and late (>72 h) surgical spine intervention versus those treated nonsurgically. DESIGN: Retrospective case series comparing outcomes by surgical and nonsurgical groups during acute care, rehabilitation, and at 1-year follow-up. SETTING: Multicenter National Spinal Cord Injury Database. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive patients with acute, nonpenetrating, traumatic SCI from 1995 to 2000, admitted in the first 24 hours after injury. Surgical spinal intervention was likely secondary to nature of injury and the need for spinal stabilization. Interventions Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in neurologic outcomes (motor and sensory levels, motor index score, American Spinal Injury Association [ASIA] Impairment Scale [AIS]), medical complications (pneumonia and atelectasis, deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, pressure ulcers, autonomic dysreflexia, rehospitalization), and functional outcomes (acute and rehabilitation length of stay [LOS], hospital charges, FIM instrument score, FIM motor efficiency scores). RESULTS: Subjects in the early surgery group were more likely ( P <.05) to be women, have paraplegia, and have SCI caused by motor vehicle collisions. The nonsurgical group was more likely ( P <.05) to have an older mean age and more incomplete injuries. ASIA motor index improvements (from admission to 1-y follow-up) were more likely ( P <.05) in the nonsurgical groups, as compared with the surgical groups. Those with late surgery had significantly ( P <.05) increased acute care and total LOS and hospital charges along with higher incidence of pneumonia and atelectasis. No differences between groups were found for changes in neurologic levels, AIS grade, or FIM motor efficiency. CONCLUSIONS: ASIA motor index improvements were noted in the nonsurgery group, though likely related to increased incompleteness of injuries within this group. Early versus late spinal surgery was associated with shorter LOS and reduced pulmonary complications, however, no differences in neurologic or functional improvements were noted between early or late surgical groups.     

Body Temperature after EMS Transport: Association with Traumatic Brain Injury Outcomes

Introduction: Low body temperatures following prehospital transport are associated with poor outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, a minimal amount is known about potential associations across a range of temperatures obtained immediately after prehospital transport. Furthermore, a minimal amount is known about the influence of body temperature on non-mortality outcomes. The purpose of this study was to assess the correlation between temperatures obtained immediately following prehospital transport and TBI outcomes across the entire range of temperatures. Methods: This retrospective observational study included all moderate/severe TBI cases (CDC Barell Matrix Type 1) in the pre-implementation cohort of the Excellence in Prehospital Injury Care (EPIC) TBI Study (NIH/NINDS: 1R01NS071049). Cases were compared across four cohorts of initial trauma center temperature (ITCT): <35.0°C [Very Low Temperature (VLT)]; 35.0–35.9°C [Low Temperature (LT)]; 36.0–37.9°C [Normal Temperature (NT)]; and ≥38.0°C [Elevated Temperature (ET)]. Multivariable analysis was performed adjusting for injury severity score, age, sex, race, ethnicity, blunt/penetrating trauma, and payment source. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for mortality were calculated. To evaluate non-mortality outcomes, deaths were excluded and the adjusted median increase in hospital length of stay (LOS), ICU LOS and total hospital charges were calculated for each ITCT group and compared to the NT group. Results: 22,925 cases were identified and cases with interfacility transfer (7361, 32%), no EMS transport (1213, 5%), missing ITCT (2083, 9%), or missing demographic data (391, 2%) were excluded. Within this study cohort the aORs for death (compared to the NT group) were 2.41 (CI: 1.83–3.17) for VLT, 1.62 (CI: 1.37–1.93) for LT, and 1.86 (CI: 1.52–3.00) for ET. Similarly, trauma center (TC) LOS, ICU LOS, and total TC charges increased in all temperature groups when compared to NT. Conclusion: In this large, statewide study of major TBI, both ETs and LTs immediately following prehospital transport were independently associated with higher mortality and with increased TC LOS, ICU LOS, and total TC charges. Further study is needed to identify the causes of abnormal body temperature during the prehospital interval and if in-field measures to prevent temperature variations might improve outcomes.     

Can pharmacy data improve prediction of hospital outcomes? Comparisons with a diagnosis-based comorbidity measure

OBJECTIVES: The performance of comorbidity measures derived from the hospital discharge abstract, the outpatient pharmacy record, and from both sources combined, were compared in predicting all-cause and unplanned hospital readmission and length of stay. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Automated hospital and pharmacy data came from Kaiser-Permanente and included 6721 acute hospitalizations in Southern California from April 1993 to February 1995. The Deyo adaptation of Charlson's 17 comorbidities was derived from hospital discharge data and the 29 Chronic Disease Score (CDS) comorbidity markers were derived from outpatient pharmacy claims data. Logistic and OLS regression models were used to compare the performance of each measure in baseline models and to evaluate whether the CDS contributed additional explanatory power in a combined model. RESULTS: The CDS was a significant predictor of unplanned readmission (C = 0.68) and LOS (Adjusted R(2) = 0.26) in multivariable models adjusted for baseline patient demographic and hospitalization characteristics. The Deyo measure was a significant predictor of all-cause readmission (C = 0.63), unplanned readmission (C = 0.68), and LOS (Adjusted R(2) = 0.26). When pharmacy-based disease markers were added to the Deyo baseline model, modest, statistically significant improvements in predictive power were noted in the unplanned readmission and LOS models. CONCLUSIONS: The finding that both measures of comorbid disease demonstrated similar predictive power is noteworthy, because secondary diagnosis data document relevant illness in hospital patients and pharmacy claims data were never intended for that purpose. The results suggest that small improvements in model performance may come from combining both sources of data in models to predict hospital readmission and LOS.     

Characteristics of persons rehospitalized after stroke rehabilitation

OBJECTIVE: To develop classification models for risk of hospital readmission 80 to 180 days after discharge based the demographic and functional characteristics of persons discharged from acute inpatient rehabilitation after stroke. DESIGN: Retrospective, using information from US facilities subscribing to the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation (UDS(MR)). SETTING: Information submitted to the UDS(MR) from 1994 through 1996 by 167 hospital and rehabilitation facilities from 40 states was examined. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 15,992 records of patients (mean age +/- standard deviation, 70.97 +/- 12.19yr) with a diagnosis of stroke were included in the final sample. The sample included 52.7% women and was 80% non-Hispanic white with an average length of stay (LOS) of 25.31 +/- 14.72 days. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Six subscales of the FIM instrument (self-care, sphincter control, transfers, locomotion, communication, social cognition), total FIM, and other predictor variables for regression analysis (gender, age, ethnicity, marital status, prehospital living setting, LOS, primary payer source, level of function-related group). RESULTS: A logistic regression model included the following statistically significant variables (p <.05): ethnicity, sphincter control, self-care ability, gender, and LOS. The greatest variability occurred among men. Exactly 18.1% of non-Hispanic white men and 17.9% of African-American men were rehospitalized. In contrast, only 10.1% of Hispanic men and 11.4% of Asian men were rehospitalized. The odds of rehospitalization were lowest for Hispanic men. CONCLUSION: As prospective payment systems are introduced for postacute care, it is important that the relationship among functional abilities, demographic characteristics, and incidence of hospital readmission following medical rehabilitation be examined.