Global Improvement in Genotyping of Human Papillomavirus DNA: the 2011 HPV LabNet International Proficiency Study

Accurate and internationally comparable human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA genotyping is essential for HPV vaccine research and for HPV surveillance. The HPV Laboratory Network (LabNet) has designed international proficiency studies that can be issued regularly and in a reproducible manner. The 2011 HPV genotyping proficiency panel contained 43 coded samples composed of purified plasmids of 16 HPV types (HPV6, -11, -16, -18, -31, -33, -35, -39, -45, -51, -52, -56, -58, -59, -66, -68a, and -68b) and 3 extraction controls. Tests that detected 50 IU of HPV16 and HPV18 and 500 genome equivalents for the other 14 HPV types in both single and multiple infections were considered proficient. Ninety-six laboratories worldwide submitted 134 data sets. Twenty-five different HPV genotyping assay methods were used, including the Linear Array, line blot/INNO-LiPA, PapilloCheck, and PCR Luminex assays. The major oncogenic HPV types, HPV16 and HPV18, were proficiently detected in 97.0% (113/116) and 87.0% (103/118) of the data sets, respectively. In 2011, 51 data sets (39%) were 100% proficient for the detection of at least one HPV type, and 37 data sets (28%) were proficient for all 16 HPV types; this was an improvement over the panel results from the 2008 and 2010 studies, when <25 data sets (23% and 19% for 2008 and 2010, respectively) were fully proficient. The improvement was also evident for the 54 laboratories that had also participated in the previous proficiency studies. In conclusion, a continuing global proficiency program has documented worldwide improvement in the comparability and reliability of HPV genotyping assay performances.     

Global Proficiency Study of Human Papillomavirus Genotyping

Internationally comparable quality assurance of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) DNA detection and typing methods is essential for evaluation of HPV vaccines and effective monitoring and implementation of HPV vaccination programs. Therefore, the World Health Organization (WHO) HPV Laboratory Network (LabNet) designed an international proficiency study. Following announcement at the WHO website, the responding laboratories performed HPV typing using one or more of their usual assays on 43 coded samples composed of titration series of purified plasmids of 16 HPV types (HPV6, -11, -16, -18, -31, -33, -35, -39, -45, -51, -52, -56, -58, -59, -66, and -68). Detection of at least 50 IU of HPV16 or HPV18 DNA and of 500 genome equivalents (GE) of the other 14 HPV types (in samples with single and multiple HPV types) was considered proficient. Fifty-four laboratories worldwide submitted a total of 84 data sets. More than 21 HPV-genotyping assays were used. Commonly used methods were Linear Array, Lineblot, InnoLiPa, Clinical Array, type-specific real-time PCR, PCR-Luminex and microarray assays. The major oncogenic HPV types (HPV16 and -18) were detected in 89.7% (70/78) and 92.2% (71/77) of the data sets, respectively. HPV types 56, 59, and 68 were the least commonly detected types (in less than 80% of the data sets). Twenty-eight data sets reported multiple false-positive results and were considered nonproficient. In conclusion, we found that international proficiency studies, traceable to international standards, allow standardized quality assurance for different HPV-typing assays and enable the comparison of data generated from different laboratories worldwide.Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection has been established as the major cause of cervical cancer (2). Epidemiological studies have classified genital HPV types into high- and low-risk HPV types, reflecting their association with invasive cancer (19). The most important high-risk types, HPV16 and HPV18, account for about 70% of all invasive cervical cancers worldwide. The next most common HPV types on all continents are HPV31, -33, -35, -45, -52, and -58, found in approximately 20% of cervical cancers (19).An accurate and internationally comparable HPV DNA detection and typing methodology is an essential component in the evaluation of HPV vaccines and in effective implementation and monitoring of HPV vaccination programs. The genotyping assays used today differ in their performance with regard to type-specific detection rates (10). As the methodology for quality assurance and evaluation of assay performance is not standardized, comparisons between different studies that use different assays is particularly difficult (10).The World Health Organization (WHO) establishes international biological standard materials and reference reagents for substances of biological origin used in prophylaxis and in therapy or diagnosis of human diseases (http://www.who.int/biologicals/reference_preparations/en/). At the WHO meeting held in Geneva, Switzerland, from 15 to 17 August 2005, an expert group recommended the establishment of a global HPV laboratory network (HPV LabNet) to contribute to improving the quality of laboratory services for effective surveillance and HPV vaccination impact monitoring. Major activities within the HPV LabNet include the development of international standard reagents and standard operating procedures (SOPs) and the development of internationally comparable quality assurance methods (5, 26).International proficiency panels are already widely used for several microorganisms, including hepatitis A, B, and C viruses; herpes simplex virus (HSV); and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (15, 18, 24). As there is no natural source of biological material that could be used to generate type-specific HPV international standards (ISs), the first WHO international collaborative study of the detection of HPV DNA examined the feasibility of using recombinant HPV DNA plasmids as standards, focusing on HPV16 and HPV18 (13). ISs of HPV16 and HPV18 DNA were established for detection and quantification of HPV16 and HPV18 DNA by the WHO Expert Committee on Biological Standardization in 2008 with assigned potency in international units (IU).The international WHO proficiency study described in this report was based on a proficiency panel composed of purified plasmids containing the genomes of 14 oncogenic HPV types and 2 benign HPV types. As the amount of plasmid DNA was titrated in amounts traceable to the IS, the proficiency panel allowed an internationally standardized definition of assay sensitivity. Specificity was defined as an absence of incorrect typing. We also evaluated sample preprocessing with extraction controls of cervical cancer cell lines. The panel was distributed to 61 laboratories worldwide and analyzed using a range of HPV DNA-typing assays in a blinded manner. We report the results in terms of the ability of participating laboratories to correctly identify HPV types, grouped by methods performed, as well as the analytical sensitivity of detecting the HPV types included.     

Results of the first World Health Organization international collaborative study of detection of human papillomavirus DNA

Twenty-nine laboratories in 12 countries participated in a study to assess the performance of various human papillomavirus (HPV) detection assays through the use of a recombinant HPV DNA standard reagent panel. The panel was designed by a group of HPV experts, and samples were prepared and distributed by the World Health Organization International Laboratory for Standards and Biologicals in The Netherlands. Each panel consisted of 24 coded samples including a dilution series for HPV types 16 and 18, alone or in combination with five other high-risk (HR) HPV types including HPV types 31, 33, 35, 45, and 52, the low-risk HPV type 6, and a negative control. Qualitative assays were generally consistent across laboratories, and most invalid results reflected a lack of HPV test sensitivity. The combined data sets had a proficiency for HPV 16 of 62.5% (15/24) and for HPV 18 of 73.9% (17/23). HPV 31 was the least accurately detected by participating laboratories. Approximately half of participating laboratories failed to detect high concentrations of HPV 31 and, to a lesser extent, to detect HPV types 35, 52, and 6. The panel sample materials offer a source of renewable and reproducible material that could be used in the future development of international standard reagents for calibration of HPV DNA assays and kits.     

High prevalence of intermediate-risk human papillomavirus infection in uterine cervices of Kenyan women infected with human immunodeficiency virus

The aim of this study was to investigate an association between certain human papillomavirus (HPV) types and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infections. Sexually active females (n = 487; 19-61 years old) were enrolled in the study. Subjects underwent Pap testing and evaluations of HIV and HPV infection status on uterine cervical cell samples. HPV genotyping was performed using a Kurabo GeneSQUARE DNA microarray test. Overall, 23 HPV genotypes were detected, and the most prevalent HPV genotype was HPV-52, followed by HPV-39, -54, -45, -56, -53, -31, -42, -16, -68, and -51. HPV-30, -53, -54, -61, and -66, which are associated with abnormal cytology, are categorized as intermediate-risk in this study. Detection of both high- and intermediate-risk HPV types was significantly associated with cervical abnormality and HIV infection. Multivariate analysis revealed that some high-risk HPV types (HPV-31, -45, -51, -56, and -59) and most intermediate-risk HPV types were associated with HIV infection, while the high-risk types (HPV-16, -18, -33, -35, -39, -52, -58, and -68) were not. The oncogenic effect of the most malignant HPV types (e.g., HPV-16 and -18) appear to be lower, while that of intermediate-risk types are greater, in areas with a high prevalence of HIV infection.     

Correlation between human papillomavirus infection and histopathological diagnosis of women in Northeast Brazil

Cervical carcinoma is the fourth leading cause of death among women worldwide. Epidemiological studies claim that human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is a necessary condition for cervical cancer development. Knowledge of the geographic distribution of HPV is important in guiding the introduction of prophylactic vaccines. This study analyzed the prevalence of HPV infection in cervical samples obtained from women with abnormal cervical histopathological diagnosis in Northeast Brazil. The study included an analysis of 211 women whose diagnosis was confirmed for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia type 1 (CIN-1), cervical intraepithelial neoplasia type 2 (CIN-2), cervical intraepithelial neoplasia type 3 (CIN-3), and cancer. The identification of the HPV genotypes was based on the polymerase chain reaction–restriction fragment length polymorphism technique. A total of 42.7% of the samples showed a single HPV infection, while 57.3% showed multiple infections. The most common genotypes detected were HPV-16, HPV-18, and HPV-31. HPV-16, HPV-31, HPV-35, and HPV-18 were the most common types in CIN-1 with a single infection. HPV-16 and HPV-18 were the most often found in CIN-2 with a single infection. HPV-16, HPV-18, and HPV-31 were the most detected in CIN-3 with a single infection. HPV-16 and HPV-31 were the most frequent in cancer with a single infection. Multiple infection with HPV-16 shows a 2.7 times greater risk of CIN-3 (P = .04). Multiple infections for HPV with HPV-16 and excluding the HPV18/31 types, were associated with CIN-3 (P = .01). The results allowed the detection and genotyping of HPV types circulating in the population studied. These findings must be taken into account when devising vaccination strategies against HPV.     

子宫颈刮片中人乳头瘤病毒的基因分型

目的 确定不同型人乳头瘤病毒（ＨＰＶ）感染的自然历程以及其持续感染在子宫颈癌发展过程中的作用。方法 应用聚合酶链反应检测荷兰１５５名妇女子宫刮颈片中的ＨＰＶ ＤＮＡ，应用线样探针分析法（ＬｉＰＡ）进行，包括ＨＰＶ６，１１，１６，１８，３１，３３，３５，４０，４２，４３，４４，４５，５１，５２，５６和５８的基因分型。结果 １５５例妇女子宫颈片中ＨＰＶ ＤＮＡ检出率为６０％，其中在宫颈细胞学检查正常或     

Evaluation of HPV-16 and HPV-18 genotyping for the triage of women with high-risk HPV+ cytology-negative results

The ATHENA (Addressing THE Need for Advanced HPV Diagnostics) HPV study evaluated the clinical usefulness of the cobas HPV Test (Roche Molecular Systems, Pleasanton, CA) for high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) testing (14 HR types) and individual HPV-16/HPV-18 genotyping in women undergoing routine cervical cytology screening in the United States. For the study, 47,208 women were recruited, including 32,260 women 30 years or older with negative cytology. All women with positive results for HR-HPV (n = 4,219) plus a subset of HR-HPV- women (n = 886) were referred for colposcopy and biopsy. The overall prevalence of HR-HPV was 6.7% and of HPV-16/HPV-18 was 1.5%. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 (CIN 2) or worse was found in 1.2% of women examined. The estimated absolute risk of CIN 2 or worse in HPV-16+ and/or HPV-18+ women was 11.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.4%-14.8%) compared with 6.1% (95% CI, 4.9%-7.2%) in HR-HPV+ and 0.8% (95% CI, 0.3%-1.5%) in HR-HPV- women. These analyses validate the 2006 American Society of Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology guidelines for HPV-16/HPV-18 genotyping, which recommend referral to colposcopy of HPV-16/HPV-18+ women with negative cytology.     

Sourcing of the WHO human papillomavirus type 18 international standards for HPV antibody levels

BackgroundHPV serology is important for studies of vaccine immunogenicity, but can not be performed in a comparable manner without international standardisation.ObjectivesTo find suitable candidate sera from naturally infected persons for use as International Standards (IS) for antibodies to high-risk HPVs, with priority for HPV-18.Study design946 healthy Thai women (median age 44, range 18–83) and 61 cervical cancer patients were screened using an HPV pseudovirion-Luminex assay to detect antibodies to genital (HPV-6,-11,-16,-18,-31,-33,-45,-52,-58,-68) and non-genital HPV types (HPV-5,-15,-32,-38 and -76). Suitable candidate sera should ideally be mono-specific (have reactivity against only one genital HPV) and have high antibody levels that are stable over time.ResultsSeroprevalences of HPV-16,-31,-52 and -58 were at least twice as high among cancer patients compared to healthy individuals. Thirteen healthy women who met the IS inclusion criteria in initial testing also consented to blood-bag donations. Donations from 2 women with high HPV-18 Ab titers were pooled to the HPV-18 candidate IS, later established as the WHO official IS for HPV antibodies. Sera that could potentially be used as candidate IS for other oncogenic HPVs have also been identified.ConclusionsIn the Thai population, seroepidemiology implicated HPV types HPV-16,-31,-52 and -58 as particularly associated with cervical cancer. A well characterized cohort study has allowed sourcing of materials for an IS for HPV-18 antibodies and could conceivably be used for IS for other HPV types as well.     

The prevalence of HPV-18 and variants of E6 gene isolated from cervical cancer patients in Taiwan.

BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer is the second most common cancer in women worldwide. It has been considered that human papillomavirus (HPV) is associated with cervical cancer. Currently, more than 80 different serotypes of HPV have been characterized and they are divided into low- and high-risk groups. The most common types that lead to cervical cancer are HPV-16 and -18. The viral oncogenes E6 and E7 are associated with the development of cervical cancer. In previous study, the variants of HPV-16 E6 gene have been reported. It suggests that variants may influence the morbidity of carcinogenesis, but the variant study on HPV-18 remains unknown. OBJECTIVES: To identify the variants of integrated HPV-18 E6 gene in the prevalent infection of HPV-18 of cervical cancer patients. STUDY DESIGN: 25 cervical cancer patients were clinically identified and the biopsies were obtained. The infectious HPV types were identified by PCR and Southern blotting analysis. The DNA fragments of the integrated HPV-18 E6 were amplified by PCR and cloned. The nucleotide sequences were obtained by sequencing. RESULTS: The prevalence of HPV infection in our 25 cases was HPV-18 (100%) and 7 out of these 25 cases (28%) were co-infected with HPV-16. The most dominant mutation among 25 tested patients was a silence mutation C183G of the E6 coding region. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalent HPV infectious serotype is HPV-18, which differs from the worldwide prevalent type. The identified HPV-18 E6 variants had a unique silence mutation located on C183G in E6 coding region.     

Development of a sensitive and specific assay combining multiplex PCR and DNA microarray primer extension to detect high-risk mucosal human papillomavirus types

The importance of assays for the detection and typing of human papillomaviruses (HPVs) in clinical and epidemiological studies has been well demonstrated. Several accurate methods for HPV detection and typing have been developed. However, comparative studies showed that several assays have different sensitivities for the detection of specific HPV types, particularly in the case of multiple infections. Here, we describe a novel one-shot method for the detection and typing of 19 mucosal high-risk (HR) HPV types (types 16, 18, 26, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 53, 56, 58, 59, 66, 68, 70, 73, and 82). This assay combines two different techniques: multiplex PCR with HPV type-specific primers for amplification of viral DNA and array primer extension (APEX) for typing. This novel method has been validated with artificial mixtures of HPV DNAs and clinical samples that were already analyzed for the presence of mucosal HPV types by a different consensus PCR method, i.e., GP5+/GP6+. Our data showed a very good agreement between the results from the multiplex PCR/APEX assay and those from the GP5+/GP6+ PCR (overall rates of HPV positivity, 63.0 and 60.9%, respectively). Whereas the GP5+/GP6+ PCR was slightly more sensitive for the detection of HPV type 16 (HPV-16), multiplex PCR-APEX found a higher number of infections with HPV-33, HPV-53, and multiple HPV types. These favorable features and the high-throughput potential make our present novel assay ideal for large-scale clinical and epidemiological studies aimed at determining the spectrum of mucosal HR HPV types in cervical specimens.     

用聚合酶链反应检测食管癌组织中人乳头瘤病毒DNA

应用聚合酶链反应（ＰＣＲ）技术对汕头市区６８例食管癌的石蜡包埋标本进行人乳头瘤病毒（ＨＰＶ）ＤＮＡ序列检测，结果显示，ＨＰＶＤＮＡ总阳性率为６６．１８％（４５／６８），检出型别主要为ＨＰＶ６、１１、１６，检出率分别为２７．９４％、３６．７６％和２７．９４％，经统计学处理三型间无显著性差异；ＨＰＶ－１８及未定型别各占８．８２％。值得注意的是ＨＰＶ感染中多重感染占阳性病例的５３．３３％（２４／４５）。初步结果表明，汕头市食管癌高发区有较高的ＨＰＶ感染率，此与食管癌的发生，可能有密切关系。     

Performance of commercial reverse line blot assays for human papillomavirus genotyping

The performance of three line blot assays (LBAs), the Linear Array HPV genotyping assay (LA) (Roche Diagnostics), INNO-LiPA HPV Genotyping Extra (LiPA) (Innogenetics), and the reverse hybridization assay (RH) (Qiagen), was evaluated using quantitated whole genomic human papillomavirus (HPV) plasmids (types 6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, and 68b) as well as epidemiologic samples. In a plasmid titration series, LiPA and RH did not detect 50 international units (IU) of HPV type 18 (HPV18) in the presence of 5 × 10(4) IU or more of HPV16. HPV DNA (1 to 6 types) in the plasmid challenges at 50 IU or genome equivalents (GE) were identified with an accuracy of 99.9% by LA, 97.3% by LiPA, and 95.4% by RH, with positive reproducibility of 99.8% (kappa = 0.992), 88.2% (kappa = 0.928), and 88.1% (kappa = 0.926), respectively. Two instances of mistyping occurred with LiPA. Of the 120 epidemiologic samples, 76 were positive for high-risk types by LA, 90 by LiPA, and 69 by RH, with a positive reproducibility of 87.3% (kappa = 0.925), 83.9% (kappa = 0.899), and 90.2% (kappa = 0.942), respectively. Although the assays had good concordance in the clinical samples, the greater accuracy and specificity in the plasmid panel suggest that LA has an advantage for internationally comparable genotyping studies.     

Evaluation of a Newly Developed GenoArray Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Genotyping Assay and Comparison with the Roche Linear Array HPV Genotyping Assay

Persistent infection with high-risk types of human papillomavirus (HPV) is a necessary step in the development of cervical cancer. The incorporation of HPV detection into cervical screening programs may improve the ability to identify women at risk of cervical cancer. We recently evaluated the performance characteristics of a newly developed HPV detection assay, the GenoArray (GA) genotyping assay, for the detection of HPV infections by comparing it with the commercial Roche Linear Array (LA) HPV genotyping assay. The GA assay has an analytical sensitivity for the detection of HPV types 16 (HPV-16) and HPV-18 of as few as 10 to 50 copies, and its reproducibility is adequate. The GA and LA assays showed no significant difference in the rates of detection of genotypes detected by both HPV genotyping assays and oncogenic genotypes, and the interassay agreement was excellent. The GA and LA assays revealed either concordant or compatible genotyping results for 97.5% of the samples and discordant results for only eight (2.5%) samples. Compatible results were also observed for the detection of single or multiple HPV infections and the detection of most of the genotypes. The GA assay also demonstrated good clinical performance characteristics when the comparisons were carried out with clinical subgroups of samples from patients with normal cytologies, low-grade or high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, and cancers. Therefore, the GA assay appears to be highly sensitive and specific for the genotyping of HPV. It has the advantage that it specifically detects HPV-52, which overcomes a limitation of the LA assay, and hence, it has potential value for use for genotyping, especially in regions where HPV-52 has a high prevalence.Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the main etiological agent for the development of cervical cancer. Persistent infection with high-risk (HR) HPV types is recognized as a necessary step in the progression to neoplastic disease (26). Tests for HPV DNA have shown encouraging results when they are used in conjunction with the traditional cytology screening method (3, 7, 8). Many molecular methods for testing for HPV are currently available. The Digene/Hybrid Capture II (HC II) commercial HPV detection kit and the Cervista HPV HR and Cervista 16/18 tests are approved by the FDA for use for routine screening for HPV (9, 19). However, both the HC II and the Cervista HPV HR assays are unable to discriminate specific genotypes or to identify infections involving multiple genotypes, and the Cervista assay detects only two HPV types (types 16 and 18). Recent studies have suggested that different high-risk HPV types have different oncogenic potentials (5). Besides the clinical aspect, HPV genotyping is also a key part of epidemiological studies of HPV infections worldwide.A number of PCR-based HPV genotyping assays have been developed to amplify HPV DNA, followed by reverse hybridization against immobilized genotype-specific probes, allowing the simultaneous identification of a broad range of anogenital HPV genotypes. However, the different assays have potential variations in their abilities to detect different HPV types due to their different analytical sensitivities and specificities and their failure to detect specific variants (2, 17, 20).The HPV GenoArray (GA) test (Hybribio Ltd., Hong Kong) is a newly developed PCR-based HPV genotyping assay. It utilizes L1 consensus primers to simultaneously amplify 21 HPV genotypes, followed by flowthrough hybridization with immobilized genotype-specific probes. It is marked as Conformité Européenne (CE) for use in Europe and is currently being used in some hospitals in China.The present study was designed to evaluate the analytical and clinical performance characteristics of the Hybribio GA test, and the level of concordance of the genotypes detected by the GA test was compared to that of the Roche Linear Array (LA) HPV test. We focused on interassay agreement for overall HPV DNA detection and for the detection of HPV oncogenic risk types. We also assessed the interassay agreement for type-specific as well as single and multiple HPV infections.     

Evaluation of Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Assay for Detection and Typing of Human Papilloma Virus 16 and 18 from Endocervical Samples

Background: Many human papillomavirus (HPV) types are associated with cervical cancer (CC). Therefore, HPV genotyping has both clinical and epidemiological importance. HPV 16 and 18 are two principal high-risk types responsible for more than 70% of all CC cases. Although several commercial and non-commercial genotyping assays are available, there is a need for a cost-effective and sensitive genotyping method for low- and middle-income countries. Methods: The study was aimed at evaluation of loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay for HPV genotyping in cervical samples. A total of six primer sets for each HPV type were selected for the assay. The LAMP assay was standardised and validated with HPV control panel. Cervical biopsies were subjected to nested multiplex polymerase chain reaction (NM-PCR; as a part of routine diagnostic workup) and LAMP (HPV 16 and 18) simultaneously. Results: A total of 225 clinical samples were processed during the study period. The sensitivity of the assay was determined using the 10-fold dilutions of positive controls. Both the HPV 16-LAMP and HPV 18-LAMP assays were shown to detect as low as 10 viral copies per reaction, which is similar to that of NM-PCR. The LAMP assay had a good agreement (new cases; 92%, post-chemoradiotherapy [post-CRT]; 89.1%) with NM-PCR for the detection of both HPV 16 and 18. As compared to histology (new cases; 79.8%, post-CRT; 51.3%), LAMP had better agreement with NM-PCR for detection of HPV from post-CRT cases. Conclusions: We evaluated the LAMP assay for simultaneous detection and typing of HPV 16 and 18. The assay had good agreement with NM-PCR for detection of both HPV 16 and 18. The LAMP assay is a promising tool for HPV genotyping along with routine cervical cytology, especially in resource-constrained settings.     

Koilocytic changes are not elicited by human papillomavirus genotypes with higher oncogenic potential

Koilocytes are considered a common cytopathological effect in patients with human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. Thus, we aimed to elucidate whether koilocytes are common to all HPV infections. Liquid-based cytology samples from 651 patients with abnormal Papanicolaou (Pap) test results were used to analyze the presence of koilocytes and HPV genotype. HPV genotype was determined in complete liquid cytology samples and microdissected cell samples from Pap smear slides using the uniplex E6/E7 polymerase chain reaction method, which can detect 39 mucosal HPV genotypes. Koilocytes were found in 29.3% (191) of all patients. Logistical regression analysis of diverse HPV genotypes revealed that infections with low-risk HPV types (HPV-6b, HPV-40, HPV-42, HPV-61, HPV-74, HPV-89, and HPV-90), probably high-risk HPV types (HPV-53 and HPV-66), and high-risk types (HPV-39 and HPV-56) were significantly associated with the presence of koilocytes. However, HPV-16, HPV-18, and HPV-52, which have higher oncogenic potential, were not found to be associated with koilocytes. These results were confirmed by HPV genotyping using microdissected koilocytes in 27 patients.Most common high-risk types belonging to α-9 and α-7 genotypes appear to rarely induce koilocytic changes. Therefore, koilocytes may provide additional useful information for predicting the risk of progression to high-grade lesions.     

Human papillomavirus genotyping as a predictor of high-grade cervical dysplasia in women with mildly cytologic abnormalities: a two-year follow-up report

High-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) DNA testing has emerged as another testing modality for women with mildly cytologic abnormalities. We conducted a two-year follow-up study of 108 women with mildly abnormal cervical cytology for detection of CIN 2/3. A cervical swab sample was obtained for HPV genotyping by a HPV blot and histologic follow-up results were correlated with HR-HPV types. Of the 108 cases, 93 (86.1%) were positive for HR-HPV DNA. HPV-16 was detected in 45.1% of patients. CIN grade 2 or 3 was confirmed in 25 (23.1%) of the 108 women during the two-year follow-up period. The two-year cumulative incidence rates of CIN 2/3 were 38.6% (17/44) among HPV-16- positive women, but only 5.6% among HR-HPV-positive women without HPV-16 or HPV-18. The sensitivity of a positive HPV-16 test for CIN 2/3 was 68.0%, the specificity was 67.5%. Our results demonstrated that the type-specific HPV-16 test increased sensitivity of detecting high-grade cervical dysplasia for women who have mildly cytologic abnormalities. The implication of the present findings is that HPV genotyping may identify women with the greatest risk of high-grade CIN.     

宫颈上皮内瘤样病变患者高危型HPV感染基因分型分析

目的了解宫颈上皮内瘤变患者的高危型HPV的感染及其分型和不同程度宫颈病变的主要感染型别情况。方法应用型特异PCR检测宫颈癌前病变的患者的主要高危型HPV-16、18、33、58的感染及其分型情况的相关性研究。结果在本研究宫颈上皮内瘤变患者98例中,4种高危型HPV的总阳性例数为73例,HPV总的感染率为74.5%,存在多重感染。其中HPV-16、18、33、58的总感染率分别为53.1%、38.7%、17.3%和30.6%。CIN的Ⅰ/Ⅱ/Ⅲ3组患者的4种高危型HPV的感染率分别为42.9%、61.1%和93.2%。结论主要高危型HPV在宫颈上皮内瘤变患者中感染的主要型别依次为HPV16、HPV18、HPV58、HPV33,主要为HPV16和HPV18型;不同程度CIN的高危型HPV的总感染率不同,随病变程度的加重而增加。     

Serum antibodies to human papillomavirus (HPV) pseudovirions correlate with natural infection for 13 genital HPV types

BackgroundSerology for human papillomaviruses (HPV) types -16 and -18 is established as an important tool for studies of HPV vaccinology and epidemiology. However, as there are a large number of oncogenic genital types of HPV there is a need for development of high-throughput, validated HPV serological assays that can be used for more comprehensive seroepidemiological studies and for research on multivalent HPV vaccines.ObjectivesTo develop a multiplexed pseudovirion-based serological assay (PsV-Luminex) encompassing 21 HPV types and validate the method by correlating the serology with the presence of type specific HPV DNA in cervical samples.Study designCervical swabs from 3,291 unvaccinated women attending organized cervical screening in Slovenia were tested with 3 different HPV DNA detection methods and presence of HPV DNA compared to presence of serum antibodies to pseudovirions from 15 genital HPV types (HPV-6,-11,-16,-18,-31,-33,-35,-39,-45,-52,-56,-58,-59,-68,-73).ResultsOn average 51% of the HPV DNA positive women were seropositive for the same HPV type that was detected in the cervical specimen. We found a strong correlation with presence of HPV DNA and antibodies to the same HPV type for 13/15 genital HPV types (median OR = 5.7, CI 95% = 2.4–12.9). HPV-52 serology failed the validation and HPV-11 serology could not be validated because only a single woman was positive for HPV-11 DNA. The correlation between serology and HPV DNA status tended to be stronger among women infected with single HPV type (median OR = 10.5, CI 95% = 2.4–48.4) than among women with multiple HPV infections (median OR = 4.6, CI 95% = 1.8–11.7).ConclusionsA multiplexed HPV PsV-Luminex assay has been developed and validated to correlate with natural HPV infection for 13 HPV types, thus enabling more comprehensive studies in HPV epidemiology and vaccine research.     

Comparative Evaluation of Three Commercial Systems for Detection of High-Risk Human Papillomavirus in Cervical and Vaginal ThinPrep PreservCyt Samples and Correlation with Biopsy Results

Genital human papillomavirus (HPV) is the etiologic agent of more than 99% of all cervical cancers worldwide, with 14 genotypes being considered oncogenic or “high risk” because of their association with severe dysplasia and cervical carcinoma. Among these 14 high-risk types, HPV-16 and -18 account for approximately 70% of cervical cancers. The aim of this study was to evaluate three FDA-approved HPV nucleic acid-based tests for the ability to predict high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasias (CIN2 or worse) in corresponding tissue biopsy specimens. Residual specimens (total n = 793, cervical n = 743, vaginal n = 50) collected in ThinPrep PreservCyt medium with a cytologic result of ≥atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance were tested by the Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) assay (Qiagen, Gaithersburg, MD), the cobas HPV test (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN), and the APTIMA HPV assay (Hologic, San Diego, CA). Genotyping for HPV-16 and HPV-18 was simultaneously performed by the cobas HPV test. Results were compared to cervical or vaginal biopsy findings, when they were available (n = 350). Among the 350 patients with corresponding biopsy results, 81 (23.1%) showed ≥CIN2 by histopathology. The ≥CIN2 detection sensitivity was 91.4% by the cobas and APTIMA assays and 97.5% by HC2 assay. The specificities of the cobas, APTIMA, and HC2 assays were 31.2, 42.0, and 27.1%, respectively. When considering only positive HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 genotype results, the cobas test showed a sensitivity and a specificity of 51.9 and 86.6%, respectively. While the HC2, cobas, and APTIMA assays showed similar sensitivities for the detection of ≥CIN2 lesions, the specificities of the three tests varied, with the greatest specificity (86.6%) observed when the HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 genotypes were detected.     

High-risk human papillomavirus testing in women with ASC-US cytology: results from the ATHENA HPV study

This study evaluated the clinical performance of the cobas 4800 HPV Test (Roche Molecular Systems, Pleasanton, CA) for high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) testing with individual HPV-16/HPV-18 genotyping in women 21 years or older with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US). Women (N = 47,208) were recruited in the United States during routine screening, and liquid-based cytology and HPV testing were performed. The ASC-US prevalence was 4.1% (1,923/47,208), and 1,578 women underwent colposcopy with valid results. The cobas 4800 HPV Test demonstrated performance comparable to the Hybrid Capture 2 test (QIAGEN, Gaithersburg, MD) for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 2 or worse and grade 3 or worse. HPV-16/HPV-18+ women had a greater absolute risk of CIN 2 or worse compared with pooled HR-HPV+ and HR-HPV- women (24.4%, 14.0%, and 0.8%, respectively). The cobas 4800 HPV Test is clinically validated for ASC-US triage. HPV-16/HPV-18 genotyping can identify women at highest risk for high-grade cervical disease, and this additional risk stratification may be used in formulating patient management decisions.