The Effects of Rate-Adaptive Atrial Pacing Versus Ventricular Backup Pacing on Exercise Capacity in Patients with Left Ventricular Dysfunction

Background: Atrial rate-adaptive pacing may improve cardiopulmonary reserve in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.
Methods: A randomized, blinded, single-crossover design enrolled dual-chamber implantable defibrillator recipients without pacing indications and an ejection fraction ≤40% to undergo cardiopulmonary exercise treadmill stress testing in both atrial rate-adaptive pacing (AAIR) and ventricular demand pacing (VVI) pacing modes. The primary endpoint was change in peak oxygen consumption (VO₂). Secondary endpoints were changes in anaerobic threshold, perceived exertion, exercise duration, and peak blood pressure.
Results: Ten patients, nine males, eight with New York Heart Association class I, mean ejection fraction 24 ± 7%, were analyzed. Baseline VO₂ was 3.6 ± 0.5 mL/kg/min. Heart rate at peak exercise was significantly higher during AAIR versus VVI pacing (142 ± 18 vs 130 ± 23 bpm; P = 0.05). However, there was no difference in peak VO₂ (AAIR 23.7 ± 6.1 vs VVI 23.8 ± 6.3 mL/kg/min; P = 0.8), anaerobic threshold (AAIR 1.3 ± 0.3 vs VVI 1.2 ± 0.2 L/min; P = 0.11), rate of perceived exertion (AAIR 7.3 ± 1.5 vs VVI 7.8 ± 1.2; P = 0.46), exercise duration (AAIR 15 minutes, 46 seconds ± 2 minutes, 54 seconds vs VVI 16 minutes, 3 seconds ± 2 minutes, 48 seconds; P = 0.38), or peak systolic blood pressure (AAIR 155 ± 22 vs VVI 153 ± 21; P = 0.61) between the two pacing modes.
Conclusion: In this study, AAIR pacing did not improve peak VO_2, anaerobic threshold, rate of perceived exertion, or exercise duration compared to VVI backup pacing in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and no pacing indications.     

Role of rate control and regularization through pacing in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation and preserved ventricular function: the VRR study

Aim: High heart rates in chronic atrial fibrillation (CAF) is one of the factors responsible for hemodynamic alterations and may lead to tachycardiomyopathies. The ventricular rate regulation (VRR) study evaluates the effect of ventricular rate regularization in CAF patients with preserved ventricular function, marked ventricular rate variability, and indications for pacemaker (PM) implantation owing to symptomatic pauses. Rate regularization was achieved using VRR algorithm (INSIGNIA® pacemakers, Guidant Corp., St. Paul, MN, USA) .
Methods: One month after PM implantation, 58 patients followed two 3-month crossover periods (VRR-OFF; VRR-ON) in which the VRR algorithm was randomized and compared to fixed rate stimulation at 60 ppm. During follow-up visits a 6-minute walk test was performed under partially inhibited conditions (PM at 40 ppm) and ventricular response was recorded. The following parameters were measured: mean ventricular rate (MR), rate variability (RR30), rate recovery after exercise (SLOPE = (R-END – R-REC)/(R-END – 40)), R-END being the rate at end of walk and R-REC the rate 1 minute after exercise.
Results: The VRR algorithm decreased rate variability (RR30: −7.36 ± 8.8; P < 0.01) without increasing ventricular rate (MR: −1.11 ± 8.3 P = NS), while SLOPE improved significantly (SLOPE: +15.41 ± 16.8 P < 0.01).
Conclusions: VRR effectively stabilizes rate, without increasing pacing rate above spontaneous rhythm and helps achieve a more favorable autonomic balance, improving rate recovery after exercise.     

Accelerometer-Based Adaptive-Rate Pacing: A Multicenter Study

A new adaptive rate pacemaker, using an acceleromeler to detect body motion as an indicator of metabolic demand, was evaluated in 13 centers located in five countries. During the study, 55 patients with a broad range of indications were implanted with the EXCEl™ VR single chamber pacemaker. One month evaluations were completed on a subgroup 0f 37 patients. The pacemaker response was optimized before discharge using a simple walking test. An "exercise test" recording feature in the programmer eliminated the need for ECG monitoring. At nominal settings, the mean (± SD) pacing rate increased 29 ± 9 ppm while walking slowly and 44 ± 11 ppm (n = 33) during a brisk walk. This information was used to optimize the parameter settings. Without further changes to the programmed settings the patients were subsequently tested 2–4 weeks postimplant with a symptom-limited treadmill test using the chronotropic assessment exercise protocol (CAEP). Mean pacing rate increased from 74.5 ±2.5 ppm (n = 24) at rest to 118.6 ± 12.2 ppm (n = 21) at 3 mph/6% grade to 143.5 ± 3.5 ppm [n = 2) at 3.8 mph/8% grade. Conclusion: The individual responses were proportional to the physical exertion imposed on the patients. Pacing rates were considered to be appropriate using the chronotropic response zone as a criterion for appropriate rate modulation. A simple walking test utilizing the exercise test facility, results in appropriate optimization of the pulse generator to the individual patient.     

Benefits and Limitations of Rate Adaptive Pacing Under Laboratory and Daily Life Conditions in Patients with Minute Ventilation Single Chamber Pacemakers

Rate adaptive pacing has been shown to improve hemodynamic performance and exercise tolerance during acute testing. However, there remain concerns about its benefit in daily life and possible complications incurred by unnecessary pacing. This double-blind crossover study compared the benefit of rate adaptive (SSIR) versus fixed rate (SSI) pacing under laboratory and daily life conditions in 20 rate incompetent patients with minute ventilation single chamber pacemakers (META II). The heart rate (HR) response during three different exercise tests (treadmill, bicycle ergomctry, walking test) was correlated with the Holler findings during daily life in either pacing mode. The maximal HR was significantly higher in the SSIR-mode compared to the SSI-mode, both during laboratory testing (treadmill: 123 ± 15 vs 93 ± 29 beats/min: ergometry: 118 ± 15 vs 89 ± 27 beats/min; walking test: 127 ± 9 vs 95 ± 26 beats/min, all P values < 0.01) as well as during daily life (Holter: 126 ± 13 vs 103 ± 24 beats/min, P < 0.01). On Holter, the average HR (71 ± 14 vs 71 ± 8 beats/min) and the percentage of paced rhythm (54 % vs 62%, SSI- vs SSIR-mode, P = NS) were not different in either mode. However, despite a 30% rate gain in the SSIR-mode, the exercise capacity remained unchanged, and only 38% of patients preferred the SSIR-mode. Minute ventilation pacemakers provide a physiological rate response to exercise. Irrespective of the protocol used, the findings of laboratory testing are comparable to those during daily life. However, patient selection for rate adaptive single chamber pacing should be made with caution, since the objective benefit of restoring normal chronotropy may subjectively be negligible for most patients.     

An Integrated Dual Sensor System Automatically Optimized by Target Rate Histogram

The use of combined sensors and advanced algorithms using different principles can improve rate performance over a single sensor system. Combinations of sensors and more sophisticated algorithms, however, invariably increase the complexity of pacemaker programming. An automatically optimized combined minute ventilation and activity DDDR pacemaker was developed to minimize repeated sensor adjustment. The device used subthreshold (below cardiac stimulation threshold) lead impedance to detect lead configuration at implantation automatically, followed by "implant management," including setting of lead polarity and initiation of DDDR pacing. Automatic sensor adaptation was achieved by programming a "target rate histogram" based on the patient's activity level and frequency of exertion, and the rate profile optimization process matched the recorded integrated sensor response to the target rate histogram profile. In nine patients implanted with the DX2 pacemakers, the implant management gave 100% accuracy in the detection of lead polarity. Rate profile optinuzation automatically increased the pacing rate during exercise between discharge and 3-month follow-up (hall walk: 78 ± 3 vs 98 ± 3 beats/min, and maximal treadmill exercise: 89 ± 6 vs 115 ± 5 beats/min, P < 0.001) with a significant increase in exercise duration during maximal exercise (7.18 ± 1 min vs 9.56 ± 2 min, P = 0.05). The accuracy of rate profile optimization versus manual programming was assessed at 1 month, and there was no significant difference between pacing rate kinetics and maximal pacing rate between the two methods of programming. In conclusion, pacemaker automaticity can be initiated at implantation and the self-optimized rate adaptive response appeared to be comparable to that derived from a manual programming procedure, which may reduce the need to perform time consuming sensor programming.     

Beat-to-beat heart rate adaptation in pediatric and late adolescent patients with closed loop rate-responsive pacemakers

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of physiological rate-responsive pacemakers (Closed Loop Stimulation--CLS) to pace pediatric and late adolescent patients undergoing rest, mental, standing, and exercise testing. Dual-chamber pacemaker is increasingly indicated for young patients. A new physiological pacing mode based on the indirect measure of ventricular contractility (CLS), has shown interesting results in adults, while no data on pediatric patients are available. RR intervals and beat-to-beat systolic and diastolic pressures were monitored in 12 pediatric patients (6 males, mean age 17 years [12-22 years]) who had a transvenous implant of Inos2+-CLS dual-chamber pacemaker (Biotronik GmbH, Berlin, Germany) and endocardial leads. All the patients showed correct electrical parameters at the implant and during the follow-ups. Paced RR intervals decreased significantly (F = 7.28, P = 0.01) from 0.85 +/- 0.08 seconds (rest) to 0.73 +/- 0.10 seconds (mental) and to 0.75 +/- 0.010 seconds (standing); systolic/diastolic pressure was significantly higher (F = 12.2, P = 0.002/F = 13.6, P = 0.001) in mental (134.4 +/- 19.9/74.4 +/- 8.1 mmHg) with respect to rest (115.1 +/- 18.3/61.0 +/- 6.1 mmHg), and standing (118.7 +/- 23.9/67.3 +/- 0.1 mmHg). During exercise the paced RR interval showed significant decrease of about 35% from baseline to maximum load (F = 24.90, P = 0.001) and systolic pressure increased significantly (F = 4.91, P = 0.019) by about 34% from baseline to maximum load. The comparison between paced and spontaneous rates showed very similar values and trend. In addition, CLS mode does not seem to overrun the spontaneous heart activity, when present. This is a study to evaluate CLS pacing in pediatric and late adolescent patients. The study shows that CLS pacing responds to both physical and non-physical stressors, providing physiological pacing rates, as previously observed in adults.     

Heart rate turbulence and heart rate variability in patients with atrial synchronous ventricular pacing

Background: Heart rate turbulence (HRT) and heart rate variability (HRV) have been shown to be independent and powerful predictors of mortality in a specific group of cardiac patients. Pacing has unfavorable effects on autonomic function. Our aim is to investigate autonomic responses to atrial synchronous ventricular pacing (VDD) by evaluating HRT and HRV parameters.
Methods and Results: The study groups comprised 12 control and 12 patients without organic heart disease and with normal sinus function who were implanted with a permanent VDD pacing system for high-degree atrioventricular block. The HRV and HRT analysis were assessed from a 24-hour Holter recording. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups for HRV parameters. When HRT parameters were compared, turbulence onset was significantly higher in the cardiac paced group than the controls group (2.729 ± 8.818 vs –1.565 ± 8.301, P = 0.006), but no statistically significant difference was found between the two groups for turbulence slope (11.166 ± 10.034 vs 31.675 ± 28.107, P = 0.68). The number of patients who had abnormal HRT onset was significantly higher in the paced group than controls (9 vs 2, P = 0.004).
Conclusion: Atrial synchronous pacing has unfavorable effects on autonomic function. Altered ventricular depolarization sequence may lead to changes in autonomic response. Although we found no difference in HRV parameters between the control and VDD patient groups, the HRT onset and number of patients with abnormal HRT onset was significantly higher in VDD patients. HRT onset can be a better way of noninvasive autonomic response predictor in VDD patients.     

Superior Cardiac Hemodynamics of Atrioventricular Synchrony Over Rate Responsive Pacing at Submaximal Exercise: Observations in Activity Sensing DDDR Pacemakers

LAU, C.-P., ET AL.: Superior Cardiac Hemodynamics of Atrioventricular Synchrony Over Rate Responsive Pacing at Submaximal Exercise: Observations in Activity Sensing DDDR Pacemakers. The relative hemodynamic profile between dual chamber pacing (DDD) and activity sensing rate responsive pacing (VVIR) was compared in ten patients with dual chamber rate responsive pacemakers (Synergist 11). With a double blind, randomized exercise protocol, DDDR pacemakers were programmed into VVI, VVIR, and DDD (AV interval 150 msec) modes and in seven patients the test in the DDD mode was repeated with the AV interval programmed at 75 msec. A treadmill exercise test of 6-minutes duration (2 stages, Stage 1 at 2 mph, 0% gradient and Stage II at 2 mph, 15% gradient) was performed at each of the programmed settings, with a rest period of 30 minutes in between tests. Cardiac output was assessed using continuous-wave Doppler sampling ascending aortic flow and expressed as a percentage of the value achieved during VVI pacing. During exercise, pacing rate between DDD and VVIR pacing was similar but was higher with DDD at the first minute of recovery (91 ± 4vs 81 ± 3 beat/min, respectively). Cardiac output was significantly higher at rest, during low level exercise, and recovery with DDD pacing compared with VVIR pacing (resting: 21 ± 14 vs -2 ± 7%; Stage I: 36 ± 6 vs 16 ± 7%; Stage II: 25 ± 15 vs 10 ± 8%; recovery: 26 ± 12 vs 4 ± 9%; p < 0.05 in all cases). Systolic blood pressure was significantly higher during low level of exercise in the DDD mode. Shortening of the AV interval to 75 msec did not significantly affect cardiac output during exercise, but cardiac output after exercise was reduced (2 ± 6 vs 23 ± 6% at an AV interval of 150 msec, p < 0.02). By enhancing the stroke volume, DDD pacing improves cardiac hemodynamics at rest, during low level exercise, and early postexercise recovery.     

The Effect of Maximum Heart Rate On Oxygen Kinetics and Exercise Performance at Low and High Workloads

The normal heart rate is lineurly related to oxygen consumption during exercise. The maximum heart rate of the normal sinus node is approximated by the formula: HR_max= (220-age) with a variance of approximately 15%. However, the nominal upper rate of most permanent pacemakers is 120 beats/min, a value that remains unchanged for many patients. As this nominal setting falls well below the maximum predicted heart rate for most patients, it is possible that the chronotropic response of rate adaptive pacemakers during moderate und maximal exercise workloads may be less than optimal. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the upper programmed rate on oxygen kinetics during submaximal exercise workloads and maximum exercise performance during symptom-limited treadmill exercise. Exercise performance with an upper rate programmed to 220-age was compared with an upper rate of 120 beats/min. Eleven patients (5 men and 6 women, mean age 54 ± 10 years) with complete heart block following catheter ablation of the atrioventricular junction for refractory atrial fibrillation who were implanted with permanent, rate-modulating VVIR pacemakers comprised the study population. The rate adaptive sensors were based on activity in 8 patients, minute ventilation in 2 patients, and mixed venous oxygen saturation in 1 patient. After performing a symptom-limited treadmill exercise test to determine maximum exercise capacity and to optimize programming of the rate adaptive sensor, each subject performed two treadmill exercise tests in random sequence with a rest period of at least 1 hour between tests. During one of the tests the upper rate was programmed to a value calculated by the formula: HR_max= (220-age). During the other exercise test the upper rate was programmed to 120 beats/min. Patients were blinded as to their programmed values and to the hypothesis of the study. A novel treadmill exercise protocol was used that consisted of a 6 minute, constant-workload phase at approximately 50% of maximum workload followed immedictely by incremental, symptom-limited exercise using a modified Chronotropic Assessment Exercise Protocol (CAEP) with 1 minute stages until peak exertion. Breath-by-breath analysis of expired gases was performed with subjective scoring of exertional difficulty at the end of the constant workload phase and during each stage of incremental exercise using the Borg Perceived Exertion Scale. Exercise duration was significantly longer (6.37 ± 47 vs 611 ±48 seconds. P < 0.005) with the higher programmed upper rate. Oxygen kinetics were also significantly improved with an age predicted upper rate with a lower O₂ deficit (258 ± 88 vs 395 ± 155 ml, P = 0.002) and higher VO₂ rate constant (3.6 ± 1.0 vs 2.4 ± 0.7. P < 0.001.). The V0_2maxduring peak exertion was higher with an age predicted upper rate than with an upper rate of 120 beats/min (1807 ± 751 vs 1716 ± 702 mL/min, P = 0.01). The mean Borg score was lower during the last common treadmill stage during maximum exercise with an age predicted upper rate than with an upper rate of 120 beats/min (15.7 ± 2.0 vs 16.5 ± 1.9. P = 0.04). The mean Borg score during submaximal. constant workload exercise was also lower with a higher upper rate (9.0 ±2.5 vs 9.6 ± 2.2, P = 0.10). Programming the upper rate of rate adaptive pacemakers based on the age of the patient improves exercise performance and exertional symptoms during both low and high exercise workloads as compared with a standard nominal value of 120 beats/min.     

Clinical Evaluation of a Dual Sensor, Rate Responsive Pacemaker

Dual sensor pacemakers should respond more appropriately during differing exercise modes than a single sensor device. The Topaz™ models 515 (QT and activity count [ACT] sensing) pacemaker shows appropriate rate response during treadmill exercise testing. We postulated that adjustments to relative sensor contribution should allow fine tuning of the onset of rate response. Eleven patients with this pacemaker were studied. Three standard exercise tests were performed with adjustment of sensor blending and activity threshold between each one. We also assessed the response to isometric exercise and a false positive activity signal. Results : Times to 100 ppm (3.7 ± 1.3, 4.4 ± 2.0, 5.3 ±1.5 mins), times to peak rate (6.1 ± 1.6, 5.6 ± 1.4, 6.5 ± 1.3 mins) and accelerations to peak (9.0 ± 2.4, 9.2 ± 5.3, 7.7 ± 2.8 ppm/min) were measured in all three different sensor settings (QT = ACT, QT 相似文献   

Abnormal Nocturnal Heart Rate Variability and QT Dynamics in Patients with Brugada Syndrome

Background: In Brugada syndrome (BSY), most of the ventricular arrhythmic events are nocturnal, suggesting an influence of the autonomic nervous system.
Methods: In 46 patients (mean age = 41 ± 14 years, 43 men) with electrocardiograms (ECG) consistent with BSY and structurally normal hearts, we measured heart rate variability (HRV) and QT dynamics (QT/RR slopes) on 24-hour ambulatory ECG. Type 1 BSY-ECG was spontaneous in 23 (50%) and induced in 23 patients.
Results: History of syncope was present in 23 patients (50%). Programmed ventricular stimulation induced ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VTA) in 13 patients (28%). A single patient developed ventricular tachycardia during a mean follow-up of 34 months. Compared to a control group matched for age and sex, HRV was decreased over 24 hours and during nighttime in patients with BSY (SDNN 122 ± 44 vs 93 ± 36 ms, P = 0.0008 and SDANN 88 ± 39 vs 54 ± 24 ms, P < 0.0001). QTend /RR slopes were decreased over 24 hours in patients with BSY (0.159 ± 0.05 vs 0.127 ± 0.05, P = 0.003) and particularly at night (0.123 ± 0.04 vs 0.089 ± 0.04, P = 0.0001). QTend /RR slopes were significantly decreased during nighttime in patients with spontaneous versus provoked BSY-ECG patterns. By contrast, HRV and QT/RR slopes were similar in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients, whether VTA were induced or not.
Conclusions: Patients with a BSY-ECG pattern had lower HRV and QT/RR slopes than control subjects during nighttime. High-risk patients with spontaneous BSY-ECG patterns had the lowest nocturnal QTend/RR slopes. These unique repolarization dynamics might be related to the frequent nocturnal occurrence of VTA in BSY.     

Validity of the 6-minute walk test for assessing heart rate recovery after an exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation programme

Objectives

To compare heart rate responses in the 6-minute walk test and the treadmill exercise test before and after an exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation programme.

Design

Prospective cohort study.

Setting

Hospital-based cardiac rehabilitation programme in Hong Kong.

Participants

Thirty patients (mean age 62.1 ± 8.5 years, 20 males) with stable ischaemic heart disease.

Interventions

Eight-week exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation programme involving upper and lower limb aerobic and resistance training.

Main outcome measures

Six-minute walk test and treadmill exercise test before and after the exercise programme.

Results

Comparing parameters before and after the exercise programme, the peak heart rate in the 6-minute walk test increased (median of 105 beats per minute (bpm), interquartile range 96.8-116.5 versus 110 bpm, interquartile range 100.5-124.5, P = 0.006), while heart rate recovery improved in each 30-second interval of a 2-minute recovery period. The distance covered during the 6-minute walk increased from a mean of 486.3 m (±standard deviation 113.9 m) to 552.5 m (±standard deviation 111.9 m) (P < 0.001). Rating of perceived exertion during the 6-minute walk test decreased from a median of 14 (interquartile range 13-15) to 13 (interquartile range 13-13) (P = 0.001). Heart rate recovery following treadmill exercise testing improved during the 30-second periods from 60 to 90 seconds and from 90 to 120 seconds of recovery. Metabolic equivalents increased during treadmill testing from a median of 7.0 (interquartile range 5.8-8.6) to 8.6 (interquartile range 7-8.6) (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Both treadmill exercise and 6-minute walk tests demonstrated improvements in heart rate recovery and increases in achieved workload following exercise training. This suggests that the 6-minute walk test is a valid tool to assess heart rate recovery following such a programme.     

Blood Pressure Response to Transition from Supine to Standing Posture Using an Orthostatic Response Algorithm

Upon standing from a supine position, the normal response is an increase in heart rate to maintain blood pressure (BP). In patients with chronotropic incompetence, heart rate may not increase upon standing, and they may experience orthostatic hypotension (OH). We evaluated a new orthostatic response (OSR) pacing algorithm that uses an accelerometer signal to detect sudden activity following prolonged rest to trigger a 2 minutes increase in pacing rate to 94 bpm. Ten recipients of DDDR pacemakers which contain the OSR compensation algorithm (mean age = 77 ± 9 years, 8 women) with sick sinus syndrome (n = 6) or atrioventricular block (n = 4) were studied. In all patients BP was measured before and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, and 3 minutes after standing at their programmed base rate. A 20 mmHg fall in systolic BP upon standing was observed in five patients (OH patients), while the other five were considered non-OH patients. The measurements were repeated with the OSR algorithm turned on. Mean BP was defined as 1/3 systolic BP + 2/3 diastolic BP. Baseline heart rate was significantly slower in OH patients (62 ± 2 bpm) than non-OH patients (71 ± 7 bpm, P < 0.05). In OH patients mean BP increased significantly upon standing (P < 0.05 for all comparisons) with the algorithm ON instead of decreasing with the algorithm OFF, at 1 minute (+3.4 vs −10.3 mmHg), 1.5 minutes (+7.0 vs −4.9 mmHg), 2 minutes (+1.6 vs −6.7 mmHg), and 3 minutes (+2.5 vs −8.5 mmHg). These preliminary results suggest that the OSR algorithm maintains BP upon standing in patients with OH.     

Long-Term Clinical Performance of a Central Venous Oxygen Saturation Sensor for Rate Adaptive Cardiac Pacing

Rate adaptive ventricular pacemakers using central venous oxygen saturation (O₂Sat) to control the pacing rate have been implanted in 14 patients (mean age 71 years), with a mean follow-up period of 44 months (range 2–63 months). In eight patients the pacemakers were replaced due to signs of battery depletion after an implant duration of 39–58 months. During bicycle exercise testing the O₂Sat decreased on average from 61%± 4% at rest to 36%± 4% (P < 0,0001) at peak exercise, and the maximum pacing rate was 122 ± 5 beats/min. The time delay until the O₂Sat bad dropped 10%, 65%, and 90% of the total reduction during exercise was 4.8 ± 0.9 seconds, 39.8 ± 3.8 seconds, and 71.3 ± 7.5 seconds, respectively. The O₂Sat decreased 9.4%± 2% (P <0.005) from resting supine to resting sitting. Oxygen breathing increased the telemetered O₂Sat from the pacemaker by 8.4 %± 1 % (P < 0.001). During follow-up the O₂Sats were relatively stable in 50% of the patients, but demonstrated significant fluctuations in the others. At 1-year invasive follow-up O₂Sat measured by the pacemaker decreased 22%± 2%, and in blood samples from the right ventricle 22%± 2% from rest to 3 minutes exercise at 25 watts. There was a significant correlation between O₂Sat measured by the pacemaker and in blood samples from right ventricle (n = 105; r = 0.73; P < 0.001). In two patients the O₂Sat dropped significantly during pneumonia. In another patient episodes of angina pectoris was associated with low O₂Sat and a concomitant fast pacing rate.     

A Rate Responsive Pacemaker that Physiologically Reduces Pacing Rates at Rest

Current rate responsive pacemakers incorporate sensors such as minute ventilation (MV) for adapting to changing patient conditions during exercise and periods of exertion. However, for sleep and/or rest periods, the only pacemakers currently on the market that slow the pacing rate utilize an internal timer to determine a decrease in pacing rate. It would be advantageous if the pacing rate could be automatically lowered during periods of sleep or rest. This study utilized a rate responsive sensor, MV, to track the patient's sleeping and resting periods and to decrease the pacing rate at such times. A total of eight patients implanted with Sentri 1210 single chamber MV sensor pacemakers were studied. A sleep rate (SH) of 45 beats/min was selected. A sleep rate response function, which indicated the relationship between changes in MV and corresponding heart rate, was initially set at a value of 16 and continually and automatically updated in a 3-month study. Adaptation was based on the premise that 3 hours per day should be spent at the SR. The average decrease in pacing rates from onset to 3 month for the eight patients was 12.4%± 5.3%. Correspondingly, the histograms of the lowest datalog histogram (40–59 beats/min) increased from 0% to 15.4%± 0.9% of paced beats. Correlation between the patients' 24-hour diary and Holter recordings showed that the pacing rates during sleep were consistently lower than when the patients were awake and active. This was also the case with a patient whose nocturnal and daily routine was intentionally altered. In conclusion, the MV sensor has shown to be an accurate sensor for the automatic determination of periods of sleep or rest. Data demonstrates that the decreased average pacing rate will increase pacer longevity as well as potentially provide more physiological pacing rates at night.     

Benefit of Single Setting Rate Responsive Ventricular Pacing Compared with Fixed Rate Demand Pacing in Elderly Patients

In order to assess the value of a simple, single setting rate response option to VVI pacing, 12 patients (mean age 75.1 ± 6,2, range 62–83 years, seven males, five females) with symptomatic complete heart block were entered into a double-blind, randomized crossover trial of VVI versus VVIR (single setting rate responsive) pacing using Medtronic Activitrax pacemakers. Assessment was by time taken in seconds (sec) and Borg scale symptom score (6–20) for simple activities (standing from chair x 30; walking 800 meters; 52 steps on stairs [slow and fast pace], and incremental, noninclined maximal treadmill exercise), performed after a 4-week period with the patient in each pacing mode. Times were significantly improved in VVIR mode for standing from chair [mean ± SD] (78.7 ± 22.5 vs 70.7 ± 19.5 sec; P < 0.05), for 800 m walk (1032 ± 80 vs 885 ± 59 sec; P < 0.05), fast ascent of stairs (29.5 ± 7.7 vs 26.5 ± 5.6 sec; P < 0.02), and treadmill exercise (626.7 ± 189.5 vs 741.0 ± 170.2 sec, P < 0.005) although no difference in time for slow stair ascent was demonstrated. Symptom scores were significantly less in VVIR for standing from chair (12.7 ± 2.8 vs 10.3 ± 1.8; P < 0.01), 800 m walk (10.9 ± 2.7 vs 9.0 ± 2.4; P < 0.01), slow ascent of stairs (11.6 ± 2.1 vs 10.0 ± 2.0; P < 0.01), and fast ascent of stairs (13.0 ± 2.0 vs 11.7 ± 1.9; P < 0.02) but unchanged for treadmill exercise. Single setting VVIR pacing increases maximum exercise capacity and decreases perceived difficulty of submaximal exercise in elderly patients with symptomatic heart block. This would be a beneficial addition to most limited and multiprogrammable VVI systems for use in the elderly.     

Quality of Life in Patients with Rate Responsive Pacemakers: A Randomized, Cross-Over Study

Eleven patients with rate responsive pacemakers (7 men, 4 women, mean age 41 years with a range of 23-60) were randomly assigned to a cross-over study in order to assess their overall exercise capacity and quality-of-life (QOL) scores. All of the pacemakers were implanted for complete AV block or sick sinus syndrome. The pacemakers were randomly programmed into VVI or rate responsive (VVIR) pacing modes for 3-week study periods in each mode. At the end of each period, an exercise test was performed and the QOL was evaluated by the "Hacettepe Quality-of-Life Questionnaire". All patients exercised longer in the VVIR mode (mean 10.54 ± 0,73 min) than in the VVI mode (mean 7.81 ± 0.62 min) (P < 0.05). QOL scores were also found to be significantly higher in the VVIR mode (mean 173.81 ± 16.22 points) compared to the VVI mode (mean 156.27 ± 21.22 points) (P < 0.01). In conclusion, our results suggest that VVIR pacing offers a better QOL in addition to an improved exercise capacity, compared to the single chamber nonrate modulated pacing (VVI).     

The Plasma Catecholamine Responses to Ventricular Pacing: Implications for Rate Responsive Pacing

Many patients with WI and WIR pacemakers will alternate between periods of sinus rhythm and ventricular pacing. These rhythm shifts may be poorly tolerated by some patients. Changes in plasma Catecholamine levels during these rhythm shifts may contribute to these patients'symptoms. We measured blood pressure, ejection fraction and plasma norepinephrine, epinephrine, and dopamine serially in nine patients with normal left ventricular ejection fractions and WI pacemakers during sinus rhythm and at paced rates of 10 beats per minute (bpm) above sinus rates (10 + NSR), 100 bpm, and 130 bpm. The mean norepinephrine level at baseline was 143 ± 16 pg/mL and increased to 166 ± 36 pg/mL at 10 + NSR, 204 ± 47 pg/mL at 100 bpm, and 182 ± 34 pg/mL at 130 bpm. These increases corresponded to mean percent changes from baseline of 17% (P = 0.02), 33% (P = 0.002), and 24% (P = 0.07), respectively. The magnitude of the norepinephrine response was not correlated with the pacing rate. The mean plasma epinephrine level at baseline was 57 ± 6 pg/mL and peaked at 51 ± 12 pg/mL at 10 + NSR, 89 ± 31 pg/mL at 100 bpm and 101 ± 28 pg/mL at 130 bpm. These increases corresponded to mean percent changes from baseline of- 10% (P = NS), 30% (P = 0.07), and 89% (P = 0.02), respectively. No trends in the dopamine response to pacing were noted. During ventricular pacing there were no significant changes in mean blood pressure and only slight changes in ejection fraction. The individual percent changes in plasma norepinephrine and epinephrine at 100 bpm were inversely correlated to the changes in systolic blood pressure (R =−0.68, P = 0.06, and R =−0.81, P = 0.03, respectively). These results suggest that plasma norepinephrine and epinephrine increase acutely in response to ventricular pacing at rates commonly seen during rate responsive ventricular pacing.     

Clinical Study of a New Activity Sensor for Rate Adaptive Pacing Controlled by Electrical Signals Generated by the Kinetic Energy of a Moving Magnetic Ball

A new rate adaptive pacemaker (Sensorithm) controlled by an activity sensor providing electrical signals induced by a magnetic ball moving freely in an elliptical cavity surrounded by two copper coils, was implanted in ten patients; mean age of 75 years (range 64–89). Six patients had atrioventricular block and four had sinus node disease. In auto-set testing procedure during a 1-minute walk in the corridor, a slope resulting in a maximum rate of 95 beats/min was selected in every patient, and a medium reaction time was programmed. During graded treadmill exercise tests the heart rate increased 63 ± 7 beats/min to 135 ± 6 beats/min in rate adaptive pacing mode (VVIR), and 15 ± 6 beats/min (P < 0.0001) in ventricular pacing mode (VVI). The symptom-limited exercise time was 9.1 ± 1.1 minutes and 8.2 ±1.2 minutes (P = NS), and the exercise distance was 501 ± 95 meters and 428 ± 92 meters (P < 0.05) in VVIR and VVI pacing mode, respectively. The maximum oxygen uptake was 20.6 ± 2.6 mL/kg per minute in VVIR pacing and 18.1 ± 2.1 mL/kg per minute (P < 0.05) in VVI pacing. The delay time until the pacing rate increased 10% of the total rate increase at onset of treadmill exercise was 4.4 ± 0.7 seconds. Assuming a linear relation between metabolic workload and heart rate response from rest to the age predicted maximum heart rate, a deviation of heart rate ranging from 13.5 ± 11.2% to –1.6 ± 5.2% from the expected heart rate at mid-point and endpoint of each quartile of workload was observed during treadmill testing. Conclusions : By using a 1 -minute walk test for selecting an appropriate slope setting, Sensorithm provided a significant and proportional heart rate increase during exercise resulting in an improvement of exercise capacity during VVIR pacing compared to VVI pacing.     

Evaluation of a New Rate Adaptive Ventricular Pacemaker Controlled by Double Sensors

The LEGEND-PLUS, a new rate adaptive pacemaker that combines activity and minute ventilation sensing for automatic rate adaptation was implanted in the right ventricle (VVIR) in 11 patients (mean age 62 ± 9 years). Initial programming was performed using the Programmer Exercise Protocol (a 3-minute walk). This programming was evaluated by treadmill tests, up-stairs and down-stairs walking, and Holier recordings. Results: Following the final programming of LEGEND-PLUS, the mean upper activity rate was 102 ± 7 beats/rain (range 90–120 beats/min), while the mean upper minute ventilation rate was 125 ± 16 beats/min (range 100–150 beats/min). The mean rate responses during the exercise protocol and the final programming in minute ventilation and activity sensing modes were 5.4 ± 2.3 (range 1–9), versus 4 ± 2.4 (range 1–8; P < 0.01) and 7.6 ±1.1 (range 5–9), versus 7.5 ± 0.8 (range 6–9; P = 0.8), respectively. In the combined sensing mode, the acceleration rate was identical to the activity rate response and the deceleration rate mimicked the minute ventilation. Conclusion: Dual sensor VVIR pacemakers have the potential to improve rate adaptation to exercise. The rate response to exercise in patients fitted with activity and minute ventilation sensors, VVIR pacemakers closely mimics the physiological rate response.