Final height in idiopathic growth hormone deficiency: the KIGS experience. KIGS International Board

Final height was evaluated in 369 patients with idiopathic growth hormone deficiency (IGHD) enrolled in KIGS--the Pharmacia & Upjohn International Growth Database. At the start of growth hormone (GH) therapy, the patients were 9.8 years of age, their mid-parental height SDS was -0.8, and their height SDS was -3.1. Of the 369 patients, 50% had multiple hormone deficiencies, and puberty was induced in 31%. Patients were 18 years of age at completion of GH therapy, and had received GH at a dose of 0.49 IU/kg/week (0.16 mg/kg/week), with a mean of 5.2 injections/week for 8.1 years. Final height SDS was -1.5, final minus initial height SDS was 1.7 and final minus mid-parental height SDS was -0.5. A Swedish subgroup (n = 69) received conventional GH therapy throughout at 0.65 IU/kg/week (0.22 mg/kg/week), with seven injections/week for a mean of 9.4 years. These patients achieved their genetic potential (final minus mid-parental height SDS, 0.03), with a normal final height SDS of -0.3. For the total group, the following variables were associated with final height: mid-parental height SDS (r = 0.62), injection frequency (r = 0.37), duration of GH treatment (r = 0.28), peak stimulated GH concentration (r = -0.25), age (r = -0.19) (all p < 0.001) and height velocity SDS in the first year of treatment (r = 0.20, p = 0.004). In conclusion, genetic potential, expressed as the mid-parental height, is the variable with the greatest identified influence on final height during GH treatment in IGHD. Current GH regimens will lead to a normal height and attainment of mid-parental height. However, higher dose, individualized GH regimens are likely to be necessary for patients with IGHD who are disadvantaged at the time of commencing GH therapy, such as those with short parents, those whose treatment began in late childhood or adolescence and those with less severe GHD.     

Effect of combined treatment with gonadotropin releasing hormone analogue and growth hormone in patients with central precocious puberty who had subnormal growth velocity and impaired height prognosis

Growth hormone-insulin-like growth factor-I status and response to growth hormone therapy (0.6 IU/kg/week sc, six times a week for 12 months) were evaluated in 12 girls (chronological age 9.4 ± 1.6 years) suffering from central precocious puberty with growth velocity less than 4 cm/year and no substantial increase or decrease in predicted adult height during gonadotropin releasing hormone (Gn-RH) analogue treatment (D-Trp⁶-LH-RH, 60 μg/kg im/28 days). At baseline, large variations were observed in nocturnal growth hormone (GH) means (pathological values (< 3.6μg/l) 33.3%), stimulated levodopa GH peaks (pathological values (<10.0 μg/I) 28.6%) and serum insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) levels. Neither GH nor IGF-I levels were correlated with growth velocity. During recombinant GH therapy, growth velocity increased significantly (baseline 3.0 ± 0.9 cm/year; 6 months 6.4 ± 1.9cm/year, p < 0.001 versus baseline; 12 months 6.0 ± 1.3cm/year, p < 0.001 versus baseline). There was a significant increase in height SDS for bone age (baseline –1.6 ±0.5 SDS; 12 months -1.04 ± 0.6SDS; p < 0.002) and in predicted adult height (baseline 152.0 ± 3.6cm; 12 months 155.9 ± 3.4cm; p < 0.002). Our results suggest that combined therapy with Gn-RH analogues and recombinant GH can improve growth velocity and predicted adult height in girls with central precocious puberty and impaired height prognosis during Gn-RH analogue treatment.     

Growth hormone (GH) profiles in response to continuous subcutaneous infusion of GH-releasing hormone(1— 29)-NH2 in children with GH deficiency

Six children presenting with partial growth hormone (GH) deficiency (mean GH peak in two different tests, 8.0 k1.3 μ g/l ) aged 8–10.3 years (mean, 2.7 ± 0.9 years) were treated for 6 months by continuous subcutaneous infusion of GH-releasing hormone(1–29)-NH, (GHRH(1–29)-NH₂); 24-hour GH profiles and height velocity were measured. A biphasic effect of GHRH(1–29)-NH₂ infusion was observed. After an early substantial increase in the 24-hour integrated concentration of GH, from 1.6 ± 0.1 to 3.5 ± 0.7 μg/l/minute, a subsequent consistent decrease occurred by 3 months, which was more pronounced after 6 months (mean 24-hour integrated concentration of GH, 1.9± 0.9 μg/l/minute). This effect reflects modification of both pulse amplitude and frequency of GH secretion. At the end of the study, one child had complete suppression of GH secretion and two others showed only one peak above 5 μg/1 during a 24-hour period. No correlation was found between these changes and height velocity. Three children did not grow significantly; the other three children who had a growth response to GHRH(1–29)-NH₂ were those with the lowest 24-hour integrated GH concentration at the end of the study. The possible mechanisms involved in this biphasic effect, including GHRH antibodies, changes in somatostatin levels and/or desensitization of pituitary GHRH receptors, have been investigated.     

Preliminary validation of a prediction model for the short-term growth response to growth hormone therapy in children with idiopathic short stature

A discriminant scoring system, using multivariate analysis, has been developed for pretreatment prediction of responsiveness to a 6-month trial of growth hormone (GH) treatment in short children with subnormal growth velocity, but without GH deficiency. Inclusion criteria included a birth weight above 2.5 kg, height below the 3rd centile for chronological age, height velocity below the 25th centile for bone age, no signs of puberty, a maximal GH response to pharmacological stimulation of above 10 μg/l and treatment with GH at a dose of 12–16 IU/m²/week. Children with an increase in height velocity greater than 2.5 cm/year after therapy were considered to be responders. Pretreatment clinical data from 67 patients were employed in a discriminant analysis in order to establish the model. The scoring system developed was as follows: score = -0.4 + 0.92X₁– 0.87X₂, where X₁ is the height velocity SD score (SDS) for chronological age, and X₂ is the bone age SDS for chronological age. This model had a specificity of 96.3% and a sensitivity of 92.5% in predicting the responsiveness to GH. The model has subsequently been applied to a group of 14 patients in order to establish its validity; in this group its sensitivity was 83.3% and its specificity 100%. These preliminary data suggest that the model can be used as a guideline for selecting short, slowly growing, non-GH-deficient children who will respond to short-term GH therapy.     

Treatment of children with congenital heart disease and growth retardation with recombinant human growth hormone

Seven prepubertal short children with congenital heart disease were treated with recombinant human growth hormone (GH). Although complete surgical correction was performed for their heart disease at least 2 years before the start of GH therapy, improvement in growth was less than expected in these children. They received 0.5 IU kg⁻¹ week⁻¹ of GH daily for 2 years or more. The growth rate increased from a mean of 4.3 cm year⁻¹ before treatment to a mean of 7.8 cm year⁻¹ in the first year and to a mean of 6.3 cm year⁻¹ in the second year of treatment. Their mean standardized height improved from −3.41 ± 0.78 to −2.54 ± 0.62 after 2 years. The mean height age difference minus the bone age difference became positive in these children. We conclude that recombinant GH increases the growth rate in children with congenital heart disease and prepubertal growth retardation.     

Physical effects of growth hormone treatment in children with Prader-Willi syndrome

A randomized, controlled study of 54 children (age, 4-16 years) with Prader-Willi syndrome was conducted to assess the potential beneficial effects of growth hormone (GH) treatment. After observation for 6 months, the children were randomized to receive GH at a dose of 3 IU/m²/day (1 mg/m²/day) ( n = 35) or no intervention ( n = 19). The effects of GH treatment on linear growth, body composition, muscle strength, pulmonary function and resting energy expenditure were assessed. The levels of GH secreted in resonse to clonidine stimulation were universally low, and mean (± SD) insulin-like growth factor I SDS was -1.2 ± 0.8 pretreatment. In children treated for 1 year, mean height velocity SDS significantly increased from -1.0 ± 2.5 to 4.6 ± 2.9 ( p < 0.0001), mean percentage body fat decreased from 46.3 ± 8.4% to 38.4 ± 10.7% ( p < 0.001), mean lean body mass increased from 20.5 ± 6.3 kg to 25.6 ± 4.3 kg ( p <0.01) and respiratory muscle function and physical strength imporved. Mean respiratory quotients significantly decreased from 0.81 to 0.77 ( p < 0.001); however, resting energy expenditure did not change. Therefore, GH therapy appears to reduce some of the physical disabilities experienced by children with Prader-Willi syndrome.     

Pharmacokinetics of growth hormone-releasing hormone(1–29)-NH2 and stimulation of growth hormone secretion in healthy subjects after intravenous or intranasal administration

The growth hormone-releasing hormone analogue GHRH(1–29)-NH, was administered intravenously or intranasally to 30 healthy men aged 19–43 years. Intravenous injection of the lowest dose tested, 0.25 μg/kg body weight, elicited significant release of growth hormone (GH). Maximal release (mean GH peaks of about 90 mU/1) was obtained with a dose of 1–2 μg/kg. Although GHRH(1–29)-NH₂ was rapidly eliminated after intravenous injection, GH levels were elevated for about 3 hours. Absorption of GHRH(1–29)-NH₂ through the nasal mucosa was found to be low, and the bioavailability was only 3–5%. There was a dose-dependent release of GH after intranasal administration of GHRH(1–29)-NH₂, with the maximal response obtained with about 50 μg/kg; this dose was approximately as potent as 1 μg/kg injected intravenously. The GH response after repeated intranasal administration of GHRH(1–29)-NH₂ was sustained; there was no suppression of GH secretion during the night following a day when GHRH(1–29)-NH₂ had been given three times intranasally. Based on these findings and the obvious convenience of intranasal administration compared with injections, it would be justified to test intranasal therapy for treatment of short stature in children with GH deficiency caused by hypothalamic damage.     

Improved Growth Response to GH Treatment in Irradiated Children

ABSTRACT. The growth response to two years of GH treatment was studied in fifteen children after radiotherapy for a cranial tumor. The growth response was compared to that of short children (– 2 SD) and that of children with idiopathic growth hormone deficiency (GHD) of similar ages. All children were treated with hGH 0.1 IU/kg/day s.c; which is a higher dose and frequency than previously reported for irradiated children. On this protocol the growth rate increased 5.0 ± 0.5 cm/y (mean ± SEM) the first year and 3.8 ± 0.7 cm/y the second year compared to the growth rate the year before GH-treatment. Although the net gain in growth was higher than previously reported, the first year growth response was significantly reduced ( p < 0.05) compared to that of GHD-children (7.6 ± 0.5 cm/y) but exceeded ( p < 0.05) that of short children (3.4 ± 0.3 cm/y). The median spontaneous 24 h-GH secretion was 209 mU/I in the short children, 52 mU/I in the irradiated children and 16 mU/1 in the idiopathic GHD children. Thus the growth increment varied inversely to the spontaneous GH secretion observed in the three groups.     

The insulin-like growth factor I generation test in the investigation of short stature

Genotypic and phenotypic heterogeneity in patients with growth hormone (GH) insensitivity syndrome suggests that partial defects exist in the GH receptor. The insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) generation test was assessed as a means of identifying partial GH receptor defects in a heterogeneous group of 22 prepubertal children with short stature. In a subgroup of nine patients with peak GH levels of 63.7 ± 3.7 mU/l during a glucagon tolerance test, the response to the IGF-I generation test was no different from that for the group as a whole (peak GH, 43.3 ± 4.5 mU/l), despite the fact that this subgroup exhibited a negative relationship between height SDS and peak GH and a positive relationship between height SDS and IGF binding protein-3. This preliminary study therefore suggests that the IGF-I generation test in its present form will not be useful as a primary screening test for partial GH insensitivity. Despite this, the IGF-I generation test has been extremely useful in the confirmation of the diagnosis of GHIS and may therefore also prove useful in the confirmation of partial defects in the GH receptor. A subgroup of short children with peak GH levels above 40 mU/l had some characteristics of partial GH receptor deficiency. These children, to whom GH therapy would not normally be given, may respond better to recombinant human IGF-I.     

Growth in pre-pubertal children with myelomeningocele (MMC) on growth hormone (GH): the KIGS experience

PURPOSE: To analyse the auxological data of children with myelomeningocele (MMC) on growth hormone (GH) therapy whose growth data was documented within KIGS (Pfizer International Growth Database). Longitudinal growth data of a sub-group of pre-pubertal children were studied after a treatment period of 3 years. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty patients (38 m, 42 f) with MMC with a median chronological age (CA) of 11.6 years (at latest visit) on GH were registered in the KIGS database. In 52 patients, GH deficiency was documented. GH therapy started with a median dose of 0.23 mg kg(-1) per week. The 3-year longitudinal growth was analysed in 21 patients (13 m, 8 f; median CA 9.2 years, latest visit), all of whom were pre-pubertal at start and during GH therapy. RESULTS: GH therapy started at 7.5 years with a dose of 0.23 mg kg(-1) per week. Birth length SDS (-0.51) and mid-parental height SDS (+0.07) were in the normal range. BMI SDS at start was +0.24, at latest visit -0.03. After a median treatment duration of 3.0 years (latest visit), height SDS improved from -2.97 (start of GH) to -2.01. The sub-group of pre-pubertal MMC patients started GH therapy (dose 0.22 mg kg(-1) per week) at 6.2 years. Growth velocity (GV) SDS increased significantly (at start: -1.77; 1 year: +2.60, 2 years: +2.25, 3 years: +1.24), thus height SDS improved from -3.25 at start to -1.87 at 36 months. BMI SDS was in the normal range and remained unchanged during GH therapy. No major side effects of GH were recorded. CONCLUSION: GH had positive effects on height SDS in MMC patients. The analysis of the longitudinal growth data of pre-pubertal MMC patients showed a significant increase in GV SDS and improvement of height SDS.     

A Controlled Trial of Methionyl Growth Hormone Therapy in Prepubertal Children with Short Stature, Subnormal Growth Rate and Normal Growth Hormone Response to Secretagogues

ABSTRACT. Thirty short and slowly growing children with normal plasma growth hormone (GH) responses to standard provocation tests were randomly assigned to either a group ( n = 20) undergoing treatment with methionyl GH (somatrem), 2IU per m² body surface s.c. daily, or a control group ( n = 10). Twelve out of 18 children who completed the first year of treatment showed a height velocity increment of more than 2 cm/year. The mean (SD) growth velocity of the treatment group increased by 3.0 (1.9) cm/year over the first year, compared with -0.2 (0.7) cm/year in the control group. Neither parameters of endogenous GH secretion nor plasma IGF-I levels showed a significant correlation with the growth response. Of the auxological variables studied, pre-treatment growth velocity ( r = 0.8) and the short-term height velocity increment ( r = 0.7–0.9) showed significant correlations with the growth response in the first year of treatment. Somatrem therapy was without side effects, except in one child who developed anti-GH antibodies in combination with a poor growth response.     

Use of Continuous Subcutaneous Growth Hormone-Releasing Hormone (GHRH (1–29)NH2) Infusions to Augment Growth Hormone Secretion and to Promote Growth

Brain, C., Hindmarsh, P.C., Pringle, P.J. and Brook, C.G.D. (Endocrine Unit, the Middlesex Hospital, London, UK). Use of continuous subcutaneous growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH (1–29)NH₂) infusions to augment growth hormone secretion and to promote growth. Acta Paediatr Scand [Suppl] 349: 109, 1989.
It has previously been shown that an 8-day continuous subcutaneous infusion of GHRH (1–29)NH₂ in adult males augments growth hormone (GH) secretion with no evidence of desensitization of the response. The present report details the results of treatment with continuous subcutaneous infusions of CHRH (1–29)NH₂ in eight children aged 6–9 years with partial GH insufficiency. All the children showed augmentation of GH secretion and an increase in growth velocity after 3 and 6 months of therapy.     

A comparative study of growth hormone (GH) and GH-releasing hormone(1–29)-NH2 for stimulation of growth in children with GH deficiency

In this study, 60 patients with proven growth hormone deficiency (GHD) of hypothalamic origin were randomized into three equal groups, and received growth hormone-releasing hormone(1–29)-NH, (GHRH(1–29)-NH,), 30 or 60 μg/kg/day, or growth hormone (GH), 0.1 IU/kg/day, for 6 months. There were no significant differences in growth between the two groups given GHRH(1–29)-NH, but growth in the GH group was significantly better than in the other two groups ( p < 0.01). Mean height velocities at 6 months were 9.2, 9.3 and 14.6 cm/year for the three groups, respectively. Plasma GHRH concentrations increased steadily over the 6-month treatment period, with higher levels in the group on the higher dose. During GHRH(1–29)-NH₂ treatment, serum concentrations of insulin-like growth factor I rose initially, but then fell to values similar to those before treatment. No GH antibodies were detected, but all 20 patients on high-dose GHRH(1–29)-NH, and 19 of 20 patients on low-dose GHRH(1–29)-NH₂ developed GHRH antibodies. These had almost disappeared by 9 months after stopping treatment. There was no correlation between antibody titres and increase in height. No serious side-effects were seen, but three patients receiving GHRH(1–29)-NH, reported mild irritation at the injection site. These results from the continuous infusion of GHRH(1–29)-NH₂ over 6 months suggest that this treatment, or the related use of a depot preparation, is unlikely to be as effective as GH for the promotion of growth in GHD.     

Growth hormone treatment of short children born small for gestational age: metanalysis of four independent, randomized, controlled, multicentre studies

A minority of children born small for gestational age (SGA) fail to achieve sufficient catch-up growth during infancy and remain short throughout childhood, apparently without being growth hormone (GH) deficient. The effect of GH administration was evaluated over 2 years in short prepubertal children born SGA. The children ( n = 244), who were taking part in four independent multicentre studies, had been randomly allocated to groups receiving either no treatment or GH treatment at a daily dose of 0.1, 0.2 or 0.3 IU/kg (0.033, 0.067 or 0.1 mg/kg) s.c. At birth, their mean length SD score (SDS) was -3.6 and their mean weight SDS -2.6; at the start of the study, mean age was 5.2 years, bone age 3.8 years, height SDS -3.3, height SDS adjusted for parental height -2.4, weight SDS -4.7 and body mass index (BMI) SDS -1.4. The untreated children had a low-normal growth velocity and poor weight gain. Although bone maturation progressed more slowly than chronological age, final height prognosis tended to decrease, according to height SDS for bone age. GH treatment induced a dose-dependent effect on growth, up to a near doubling of height velocity and weight gain; BMI SDS was not altered. Bone maturation was also accelerated differentially; however, final height prognosis increased in all GH treatment groups. The more pronounced growth responses were observed in younger children with a lower height and weight SDS. In conclusion, GH administration is a promising therapy for normalizing short stature and low weight after insufficient catch-up growth in children born SGA. Long-term strategies incorporating GH therapy now remain to be established.     

Improved final height with long-term growth hormone treatment in Noonan syndrome

Aim: To assess whether children with Noonan syndrome on long-term growth hormone (GH) therapy improve their final height to near mid-parental height. Methods: Twenty-five prepubertal children (13 girls) with Noonan syndrome (NS) were studied. A single clinician made the diagnosis based on clinical criteria. GH treatment started at an age ranging from 3.1 to 13.8 y and was continued for at least 2 y. Improvement or “gain” in final height (FH) was defined as either the difference between adult height SD scores (SDS) and pre-treatment height SDS (the childhood component of the Swedish reference) or height SDS compared to the Noonan reference. Results: Ten children received a GH dose of 33 μg/kg/d (mean age at start 7.7±2.1 y, mean age at stop 17.6±1.7 y) and 15 received a dose of 66 μg/kg/d (mean age at start 8.6±3.3 y, mean age at stop 18.4±2.1 y). Eighteen out of 25 patients reached FH. A substantial improvement in FH of 1.7 SDS, equivalent to 10.4 cm compared to pre-treatment height, was observed. No significant difference was seen between the two GH doses. Females gained a mean height of 9.8 cm and males 1-13 cm (FH 174.5±7.8 cm vs mean adult height of 162.5±5.4 cm for males with NS) at final height. Moreover, 60% reached a mid-parental height of±1 SD.

Conclusion: GH treatment improves final height in patients with Noonan syndrome, with a mean gain of 1.7 SDS. The prepubertal height gain is maintained to final height and the children achieve a height close to their mid-parental height.     

Improvement of diagnostic criteria in growth hormone insensitivity syndrome: solutions and pitfalls

A survey to identify children and adolescents with primary growth hormone insensitivity syndrome (GHIS) yielded 38 patients who were positively identified using a scoring system that included five criteria: height, basal growth hormone (GH), GH binding protein, basal insulin-like growth factor 1 (1GF-I) and the increase of IGF-I after 4 days of GH administration (IGF generation test). Because of an overlap of the accepted and excluded groups with respect to points scored, an attempt was made to improve the scoring system. The new criteria were: height below –3 SDS, basal GH 4 mU/I or above, GH binding below 10%, basal IGF-I and basal IGF binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) below the 0.1 centile for age, an increase of IGF-I in the IGF generation test less than 15 μg/1, and the increase of IGFBP-3 less than 0.4 mg/1. With this scoring system, a clear separation between the accepted and the excluded groups was obtained. IGFBP-3 was included to give the GH-dependent parameters of the IGF system more weight and because the accuracy of IGFBP-3 in the IGF generation tests was greater than the accuracy of IGF-I, when the group of patients with GHIS was compared with a group of patients with GH deficiency. Unexpectedly, the IGF generation test was unable to segregate both cohorts completely. In the GHIS-positive group, a significant correlation was found between basal IGF-I or IGFBP-3 levels corrected for age (SDS) and height SDS ( r = 0.49, p < 0.002 and r = 0.61, p < 0.0001, respectively). There was also a significant correlation between the changes of IGF-I or IGFBP-3 in the IGF generation test and height SDS. That is, the patients with a slight response to GH were those with the least growth retardation, suggesting the existence of partial GH insensitivity.     

Growth and Growth Hormone Therapy of Children Treated for Leukaemia

A total of 37 children (24 male, 13 female) who had been treated for leukaemia with chemotherapy and 24 Gy cranial irradiation, and who were disease free for at least 18 months, were commenced on somatrem at a mean of 7.6 years (range, 4.8-12.1 years) after leukaemia diagnosis because of growth rate below the 25th centile for bone age. Peak GH response to provocation (exercise, arginine, insulin hypoglycaemia) was less than 20 milliunits/litre in 27 children (deficient group) and 20 milliunits/litre or more in 10 children (non-deficient group). The mean height SD decrease from diagnosis of leukaemia to commencement of somatrem was 1.98, 86% of the children decreasing by more than 1 SD. Those who were tall for age at leukaemia diagnosis and females were more severely affected. Mean (LSD) height velocity increased on somatrem from 2.7 ± 1.1 to 6.6 ± 2.2 cm/year during the first 6 months (n = 251, and to 6.0 ± 1.7 cm/year during the first 12 months (n = 19). No difference in growth response was seen between the sexes or between the deficient and non-deficient groups. Catch-up growth occurred for the first 6 months only. It is concluded that children with a low growth rate after treatment of leukaemia should be considered for GH therapy irrespective of the results of GH provocative tests.     

Growth hormone therapy for 3 years: The OZGROW experience

Objective : To examine the growth response over 3 years of growth hormone deficient (GHD) and non-GHD children who have received growth hormone (GH) in Australia.
Methodology : A retrospective study of a group of patients (1362 children) who commenced GH prior to 1 September 1990. Data were collected at 12 growth centres located in major cities throughout Australia. The data were transferred after informed consent to the national OZGROW database located at the Royal Alexandra Hospital for Children, Sydney, NSW. Of the 1362 children, 898 had received 3 years or more GH therapy and were eligible for this analysis. This cohort was then categorized by diagnosis. Growth response was assessed using height standard deviation score, estimated mature height, growth velocity (GV), GH dose and bone age (years).
Results : For children who completed 3 years therapy, the baseline characteristics among diagnostic groups were similar with mean height standard deviation score (SDS) less than – 3 SDS (except for the malignancy group) and mean GV ranging from 3.5 to 4.4 cm/year. The GV during the first year improved in all groups (7.7-9.4 cm/year) followed by an attenuated response during the second and third years of therapy. After 3 years GH therapy the GHD group with peak levels <10 mU/L demonstrated the greatest change in estimated mature height and height SDS. The GHD group with peak levels between £10 but <20 mU/L had a growth response similar to the non-GHD children for all outcome parameters. Change in bone age ranged from 3.1 to 3.8 years with no differences being noted between the diagnostic groups, nor consistently with pubertal status.
Conclusions : Australian GH guidelines have targeted very short children when compared to other series. This large cohort of non-GHD children has demonstrated short-term benefits of GH therapy; however, the long-term benefit remains unclear until these children reach final adult height.     

Growth hormone status in six children with fetal alcohol syndrome

Objective: Prenatal alcohol exposure may cause fetal alcohol syndrome (FAS), which is associated with pre- and postnatal growth retardation. Materials and methods: Spontaneous 24-h growth hormone (GH) secretion was measured in six prepubertal short children with FAS (two boys and four girls) aged 4-14 years. The response to a GH stimulation test, and levels of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-1) and IGF-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) were also measured. Comparisons were made between the children with FAS and healthy children of both normal and short stature, as well as children born small for gestational age (SGA). Results: There were no differences in the mean area under the curve above the baseline or the maximum level of GH during a 24-h period (GH_max) between the children with FAS and the reference groups. However, the estimated rate of spontaneous 24-h GH secretion in children with FAS was similar to that of children born SGA, but lower than in children of normal stature ( p = 0.02). The plasma concentrations of IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 were in the lower parts of the normal range. Conclusion: We conclude that GH secretion in short children with FAS is similar to that in short children born SGA; that is, in the lower range of normal children.     

No Improvement of Adult Height in Non-growth Hormone (GH) Deficient Short Children with GH Treatment

It is still in doubt whether the standard-dose growth hormone (GH) used in Japan (0.5 IU/kg/week, 0.167 mg/kg/week) for growth hormone deficiency is effective for achieving significant adult height improvement in non-growth hormone deficient (non-GHD) short children. We compared the growth of GH-treated non-GHD short children with that of untreated short children to examine the effect of standard-dose GH treatment on non-GHD short children. GH treatment with recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) was started before the age of 11 yr in 64 boys and 76 girls with non-GHD short stature registered at the Foundation for Growth Science who have now reached their adult height. In 119 untreated boys and 127 untreated girls whose height standard deviation score (SDS) was below –2 SD at the age of 6 yr, height growth was followed until 17 yr. Height SDS was significantly lower before GH treatment in the GH-treated group than at the age of 6 yr in the untreated group, in both sexes. Adult height and adult height SDS were significantly greater in the untreated group than in the GH-treated group, in both sexes, although the change in height SDS did not differ significantly. Height SDS was significantly lower before GH treatment in the GH-treated group than at the age of 6 yr in the untreated group, so 57 boys and 57 girls whose height SDS at the age of 6 yr in the untreated group closely matched the height SDS before GH treatment in the GH-treated group were chosen for comparison. Height SDS did not differ significantly between the GH-treated group before GH treatment and the untreated group at the age of 6 yr, nor were there differences between these subgroups in adult height, adult height SDS, or height SDS change, in either sex. The effect of GH treatment is reported to be dose-dependent and doses over 0.23 mg/kg/week are reported to be necessary to improve adult height in non-GHD short children. Currently, the GH dose is fixed at 0.175 mg/kg/week in Japan, and we expected to find, and indeed concluded, that ordinary GH treatment in Japanese, non-GHD short children does not improve adult height.