Clinical and histopathological risk factors to predict sentinel lymph node positivity, disease-free and overall survival in clinical stages I–II AJCC skin melanoma: Outcome analysis from a single-institution prospectively collected database

BackgroundTo investigate if the tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are able to predict the sentinel lymph node (SLN) positivity, the disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in clinical stages I-II AJCC primary cutaneous melanoma (PCM).MethodsThe study included consecutive patients with PCM, all diagnosed, treated and followed up prospectively. Logistic regression was used to investigate the association between DFS, OS, SLN positivity and Breslow thickness, Clark level, TIL, ulceration, lesion site, gender, regression and age.ResultsFrom November 1998 to October 2008, 1251 consecutive patients with PCM were evaluated. Median age was 51 (range 15–96) with 32.2% (N = 393) of them older than 60; 44.8% of them were males. Of the whole series, a total of 404 patients with primary vertical growth phase (VGP) melanoma and no clinical evidence of metastatic disease underwent SLN biopsy. Of these, 74 (18.8%) had a positive SLN. In a multivariate analysis, primary melanoma on the extremities versus that on the axial locations (truncal and head/neck) (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.25–0.98, p 0.04) and TILs (TILs versus no TILs) (OR 0.47, 95%CI 0.25–0.90, p 0.02) were predictive for lower probability of SLN involvement, while thickness (>4 mm versus 0–1 mm) (OR 24, 19, 95% CI 4.91–119.13, p < .001) was predictive for higher risk of SLN positivity. A multivariate stepwise analysis confirmed these results. The histological status of the SLN was the most significant predictor of DFS and OS. Patients with a negative SLN had a 5-year DFS of 75.9%, compared with 35.2% in patients with a positive SLN (p < .0001) and a 5-year OS of 88.7% versus 42.9%, respectively (p < .0001).ConclusionsOur study demonstrates that the absence of TILs predicts SLN metastasis, in multivariate analysis the SLN positivity predicts DFS and OS.     

Survival comparision of three-dimensional radiotherapy alone with concurrent chemoradiotherapy for non-surgical esophageal carcinoma

PurposeRadiotherapy is the main treatment method for patients with locally advanced, unresectable esophageal cancer. The aim of this study is to compare overall survival (OS) using 3D radiotherapy (3DRT) alone with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in 296 non-surgical esophageal carcinoma patients.Patents and methodsOver 10 years, of the 480 patients with esophageal carcinoma treated with 3DRT with or without chemotherapy, 148 patients each comprised 3DRT and CCRT groups after propensity score matching.ResultsThe 5- and 10-year OS (P = 0.337) and PFS (P = 0.715) rates for 3DRT alone were 22.0%, 14.4% and 26.1%, 23.2%, respectively, compared with 28.8%, 18.6% and 34.7%, 29.1% for CCRT, respectively. CCRT did not improve 5-year and 10-year OS or PFS in 60–70 Gy group (OS: 27.5% and 25.2%; 17.9% and 17.0%, P = 0.938; PFS: 38.3% and 31.8%; 31.9% and 27.8%, P = 0.890) nor reduce 10-year hematogenous metastasis (31.7% and 28.3%, P = 0.698). CCRT improved 5-year OS and PFS of 50.0–59.9 Gy group (OS: 33.3% and 12.0%, P = 0.029; PFS: 33.1% and 10.6%, P = 0.081). For 3DRT, the 5-year OS and PFS rates were significantly better in the 60–70 Gy group (P = 0.017) compared with 50.0–59.9 Gy group (P = 0.002). For CCRT group, 5-year OS and PFS favored the 50.0–59.9 Gy group, but the difference was insignificant. Major toxicities were greater with CCRT compared with 3DRT.ConclusionFor non-surgical esophageal carcinoma patients, 3DRT combined with CCRT was effective in prolonging both OS and PFS.     

Radical radiotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: an analysis of prognostic and therapeutic factors

AimsHead and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) continues to be a leading cancer in developing countries. Definitive radiation therapy either primary or as postoperative adjuvant is offered to most patients. We aimed to identify prognostic and therapeutic factors that affect locoregional control and survival in patients undergoing radical radiotherapy for head and neck squamous cell cancers.Materials and methodsA retrospective analysis of 568 previously untreated patients with squamous head and neck cancers, who received radical radiotherapy between 1990 and 1996, using local control, locoregional control and disease-free survival (DFS) as outcome measures.ResultsWith a median follow-up of 18 months for living patients, the 5-year local control, locoregional control and DFS for all 568 patients were 53%, 45% and 41%, respectively, for all stages combined. The 5-year local control, locoregional control and DFS as per the American Joint Committee on Cancer stage grouping were 78%, 70% and 70%; 64%, 59% and 57%; 51%, 42% and 37%; and 40%, 27% and 22% from stages I to IV, respectively, with highly significant P values. Patients receiving higher doses (≥66 Gy) had a significantly better outcome compared with lower doses. The 5-year local control (59% vs 48%, P = 0.0015), locoregional control (47% vs 41%; P = 0.0043) and DFS (44% vs 37%; P = 0.0099) were significantly better in patients receiving ≥66 Gy. Site of primary also affected outcome significantly, with oral cavity lesions faring badly.ConclusionTumour stage remains the most important factor affecting outcome in radical radiotherapy of HNSCC. A definite dose–response relationship exists with higher total doses, leading to better local control, locoregional control and DFS in all stages. Site of primary affects outcome too, with laryngeal primaries doing well and oral cavity cancers faring the worst.     

The proportion of tumor-stroma as a strong prognosticator for stage II and III colon cancer patients: validation in the VICTOR trial

BackgroundThe intra-tumor stroma percentage in colon cancer (CC) patients has previously been reported by our group as a strong independent prognostic parameter. Patients with a high stroma percentage within the primary tumor have a poor prognosis.Patients and methodsTissue samples from the most invasive part of the primary tumor of 710 patients (52% Stage II, 48% Stage III) participating in the VICTOR trial were analyzed for their tumor-stroma percentage. Stroma-high (>50%) and stroma-low (≤50%) groups were evaluated with respect to survival times.ResultsOverall and disease-free survival times (OS and DFS) were significantly lower in the stroma-high group (OS P < 0.0001, hazard ratio (HR) = 1.96; DFS P < 0.0001, HR = 2.15). The 5-year OS was 69.0% versus 83.4% and DFS 58.6% versus 77.3% for stroma-high versus stroma-low patients.ConclusionThis study confirms the intra-tumor stroma ratio as a prognostic factor. This parameter could be a valuable and low cost addition to the TNM status and next to current high-risk parameters such as microsatellite instability status used in routine pathology reporting. When adding the stroma-parameter to the ASCO criteria, the rate of ‘undertreated’ patients dropped from 5.9% to 4.3%, the ‘overtreated’ increased with 6.8% but the correctly classified increased with an additional 14%.     

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with advanced gastric cancer: an Asian experience

BackgroundThe incidence and prognostic impact of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) have not been determined. We therefore investigated the incidence of VTE and the clinical characteristics associated with VTE in AGC patients treated with systemic chemotherapy.Patients/MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated the incidence of VTE in 3095 patients diagnosed with inoperable AGC in the Department of Oncology at the Asan Medical Center.ResultsWe found that the 1-year cumulative incidence of VTE was 3.5% and incidence rate was 1.88 events/100 person-years (95% confidence interval, 1.54–2.28 events/100 person-years). Overall survival (OS) was poorer in patients concurrently diagnosed with AGC and VTE than in patients with VTE detected after AGC diagnosis (median OS, 4.5 months versus 10.7 months; HR, 2.171; 95% CI, 1.2–3.93; P = 0.009). Multivariate analysis identified female sex, primary tumour site on the upper portion of stomach (cardia/fundus versus body/antrum), two or more metastatic sites, lung metastasis and increased baseline CA19-9 level as independent risk factors for VTE. OS rates were significantly lower in patients with than without VTE (1-year OS, 40% versus 45.3%; 2-year OS, 10.5% versus 19.3%; HR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.0–1.52; P = 0.048). Multivariate analysis, however, showed that VTE was not a statistically significant factor affecting survival (P = 0.82).ConclusionsThe incidence rate of VTE was lower in Korean than in Caucasian patients with AGC. VTE was not an independent prognostic factor, although patients with VTE detected at the time of AGC diagnosis had markedly poorer prognosis.     

A randomized phase III adjuvant study in high-risk cervical cancer: simultaneous radiochemotherapy with cisplatin (S-RC) versus systemic paclitaxel and carboplatin followed by percutaneous radiation (PC-R): a NOGGO-AGO Intergroup Study

BackgroundSimultaneous adjuvant platinum-based radiochemotherapy in high-risk cervical cancer (CC) is an established treatment strategy. Sequential paclitaxel (Taxol) and platinum followed by radiotherapy may offer further advantages regarding toxicity.Patients and methodsAn open-labeled randomized phase III trial was conducted to compare paclitaxel (175 mg/m²) plus carboplatin (AUC5) followed by radiation (50.4 Gy) (experimental arm-A) versus simultaneous radiochemotherapy with cisplatin (40 mg/m²/week) (arm-B) in patients with stage IB–IIB CC after surgery. Primary objective was progression-free survival (PFS).ResultsOverall, 271 patients were randomized and 263 were eligible for evaluation; 132 in arm-A and 131 in arm-B appropriately balanced. The estimated 2-year PFS was 81.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 74.4–89.1] in arm-B versus 87.2% (95% CI 81.2–93.3) in arm-A (P = 0.235) and the corresponding 5-year survival rates were 85.8% in arm-A and 78.9% in arm-B (P = 0.25). Hematological grade 3/4 toxicity was higher in arm-B. Alopecia (87.9% versus 4.1%; P < 0.001) and neurotoxicity (65.9% versus 15.6%; P < 0.001) were significantly higher in arm-A. Early treatment termination was significantly more frequent in arm-B than in arm-A (32.1% versus 12.9%; P = 0.001).ConclusionsSequential chemotherapy and radiation in high-risk CC could not show any significant survival benefit; however, a different toxicity profile appeared. This sequential regime may constitute an alternative option when contraindications for immediate postoperative radiation are present.     

Prognostic effect of different cut-off values (20 mm, 30 mm and 40 mm) for clinical tumor size in FIGO stage IB cervical cancer

ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to evaluate whether applying cut-off values of 20 mm, 30 mm and 40 mm for tumor size have prognostic value in terms of survival or not.Material and methodsMedical records of 193 patients with FIGO stage IB cervical cancer (IB1: 173, IB2: 20) undergoing radical hysterectomy were evaluated. Tumor size was defined as the greatest tumor diameter determined by rectovaginal examination under general anesthesia. The influence of cut-off values (20 mm, 30 mm, and 40 mm) on surgical-pathologic risk factors and survival rates was evaluated.ResultsTumor size was ≤20 mm in 71, ≤30 mm in 125 and ≤40 mm in 174 patients. Only 40 mm was associated with the presence of metastasis in at least one of pelvic or para-aortic lymph nodes. Depth of stromal invasion was affected by 20 mm and 30 mm. For parametrial and surgical margin involvement, only 30 mm had a statistically significant effect. Probability of receiving adjuvant radiotherapy was similar with all of the cut-off values. Neither cut-off value had a statistically significant effect in terms of survival rates. It was observed that lymph node metastasis and age affected 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates. OS, but not DFS, was affected by lymphovascular space invasion. Stage, cell type, grade, parametrial invasion, presence of tumor at surgical margin and depth of stromal invasion did not affect recurrence or survival rates. Age and pelvic lymph node involvement were independent prognostic factors.DiscussionThe present study did not find a single cut-off value for tumor size that can predict all surgical-pathologic risk factors. Recurrence and survival were not affected by any of these values.     

Preliminary results of consolidation chemotherapy following concurrent chemoradiation after radical surgery in high-risk early-stage carcinoma of the uterine cervix

AimsTo evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of consolidation chemotherapy after concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin in the treatment of high-risk, early stage cervical carcinoma after radical surgery.Materials and methodsWomen with clinical stage IB and IIA cervical carcinoma, initially treated with radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy, and who had positive pelvic lymph nodes, positive margins, parametrial involvement, or all three, were divided into either a CCRT alone group or a consolidation chemotherapy after CCRT group. Three cycles of chemotherapy were given to the CCRT alone group, and six cycles to the consolidation chemotherapy group. Women in each group received 50.4 Gy external radiation in 28 fractions to a standard pelvic field. Chemotherapy consisted of cisplatin 60 mg/m² (× 1) and 5-FU 1000 mg/m²/d (× 5) every 3 weeks, with the first and second cycles given concurrent with radiation. Survival and toxicity were compared between the two groups.ResultsForty women were evaluable (25 in the CCRT alone group and 15 in the consolidation chemotherapy group). The estimated 2-year progression-free survival was 87.7% in the CCRT alone group and 67.0% in the consolidation chemotherapy group. The estimated 2-year overall survival was 95.8% in the CCRT alone group and 100% in the consolidation chemotherapy group. However, no significant differences were found in progression-free and overall survival in the two groups (P = 0.17 and P = 0.29, respectively). Grade 2 or higher leukopenia and neutropenia were significantly more frequent in the consolidation chemotherapy group than in the CCRT alone group (P = 0.02 and P < 0.01, respectively).ConclusionsAlthough the sample size was small, and this study was not randomised, these results suggest that consolidation chemotherapy may not improve survival. Rather, it may increase haematologic toxicities for women with high-risk, early stage cervical carcinoma who undergo radical surgery followed by CCRT.     

A randomized placebo-controlled study of tamoxifen after adjuvant chemotherapy in premenopausal women with early breast cancer (National Cancer Institute of Canada—Clinical Trials Group Trial,MA.12)

BackgroundIn the early 1990s, the role of adjuvant tamoxifen in premenopausal women with early breast cancer (EBC) was not established. Similarly, optimum timing relative to adjuvant chemotherapy and efficacy of tamoxifen in hormone receptor-negative tumors were unclear.Patients and methodsPremenopausal women with EBC, any hormone receptor status, after surgery received standard adjuvant chemotherapy [doxorubicin (adriamycin)/cyclophosphamide, cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/5-fluorouracil, or cyclophosphamide/epirubicin/5-fluorouracil] followed by randomization to tamoxifen or placebo for 5 years. Outcomes were overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), toxicity, and compliance with therapy.ResultsMedian follow-up for 672 women was 9.7 years. Multivariate analysis showed improved DFS [78.2% versus 71.3% at 5 years; hazard ratio (HR) 0.77; P = 0.056] and a trend for improved OS (86.6% versus 82.1% at 5 years; HR 0.78; P = 0.12). There was no evidence of greater benefit for the receptor-positive subgroup. Compliance with treatment was suboptimal in both arms, with 103 (31%) women on tamoxifen and 70 (21%) on placebo-stopping therapy early because of toxicity, refusal, or other choices.ConclusionsAdjuvant tamoxifen, given after chemotherapy to premenopausal women with EBC, improved 5-year DFS. Poor compliance may have reduced treatment efficacy.     

Management and outcome of stage 3 neuroblastoma

PurposeThe management of patients with International Neuroblastoma Staging System (INSS) stage 3 neuroblastoma (NB) is not consistent worldwide. We describe a single centre approach at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Centre (MSKCC) from 1991 to 2007 that minimises therapy except for those patients with MYCN-amplified NB.MethodsIn this retrospective analysis of 69 patients, tumour MYCN was not amplified in 53 and amplified in 16. Event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were determined by Kaplan–Meier analysis.ResultsFourteen patients with non-MYCN-amplified tumours were treated with surgery alone (group A) and the remaining 39 (group B) with surgery following chemotherapy that was initiated and administered at non-MSKCC institutions. Chemotherapy was discontinued after surgery in 38/39 of the latter. The 10-year EFS and OS for all patients with MYCN-non-amplified NB were 74.9 ± 16.9% and 92.6 ± 5.5%, respectively. There was no difference in OS between groups A and B (p = 0.2; 10-year OS for groups A and B was 84.6 ± 14% and 97.1 ± 2.9%, respectively). Patients with MYCN-amplified disease (group C) underwent dose-intensive induction, tumour resection and local radiotherapy: 13 achieved complete or very good partial remission, and 10 received myeloablative chemotherapy. 11/16 patients also received 3F8-based immunotherapy: 10 remain free of disease. The 10-year EFS and OS for patients with MYCN-amplified neuroblastoma treated with immunotherapy were both 90.9 ± 8.7%.ConclusionPatients with MYCN-non-amplified stage 3 NB can be successfully treated with surgery without the need for radiotherapy or continuation of chemotherapy. Combination of dose-intensive chemotherapy, surgery, radiotherapy and immunotherapy was associated with a favourable outcome for most patients with MYCN-amplified stage 3 NB.     

Resumption or persistence of menstruation after cytotoxic chemotherapy is a prognostic factor for poor disease-free survival in premenopausal patients with early breast cancer

BackgroundWe investigated the relationship between resumption or persistence of menstruation after cytotoxic chemotherapy (RM) and disease-free survival (DFS) in premenopausal patients with early breast cancer.MethodsMedical records from 872 patients who received cytotoxic chemotherapy for stage I to III breast cancer were retrospectively reviewed.ResultsThe median patient age was 41 years (range, 21–54) and the median follow-up duration was 6.2 years (range, 0.7–10.4). Six hundred ninety-two patients (79.4%) were hormone receptor (HR) positive and the majority of these received tamoxifen therapy after completing chemotherapy. The chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea (CIA) rate was 76.7% (n = 669), and 51.8% (n = 452) experienced RM during the follow-up period. One hundred twenty-one (13.9%) patients had persistent menstruation without CIA. DFS was significantly affected by younger age at diagnosis (≤35 years) (P = 0.013), tumor size > 2 cm (P < 0.001), node positivity (P < 0.001), HR negativity (P < 0.001), HER2 positivity (P = 0.010), and RM (P < 0.001). HR negativity [hazard ratio 1.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2–2.4, P = 0.006], tumor size > 2 cm (hazard ratio 2.1, 95% CI 1.4–3.0, P < 0.001), node positivity (hazard ratio 3.0, 95% CI 2.0–4.7, P < 0.001), and RM (hazard ratio 1.8, 95% CI 1.2–2.7, P = 0.004) remained significant factors for DFS on multivariate analysis.ConclusionsA considerable proportion of premenopausal patients treated with chemotherapy experienced RM after CIA. RM was a poor prognostic factor for DFS in premenopausal patients with early breast cancer.     

Locoregional recurrence after breast-conserving therapy remains an independent prognostic factor even after an event free interval of 10 years in early stage breast cancer

IntroductionLocoregional recurrence (LRR) after breast-conserving therapy is a well-known independent risk factor associated with unfavourable long-term outcome. Controversy exists concerning the prognostic impact of a LRR after a very long event-free interval.MethodPatients who underwent breast-conserving therapy for early stage breast cancer were pooled from four European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Breast Group trials. Only LRR as a first event was taken into account. Risk factors such as tumour size, nodal status, young age and chemotherapy were assessed in multivariate Cox regression analysis. LRR was used as a time-dependent variable in the landmark analysis for distant disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Patients were categorised as having at least 0, 5 or 10 years event-free survival.ResultsIn total, 7751 early stage breast cancer patients were included with a median follow-up of 10.9 years. Tumour size, nodal status, young age and chemotherapy are strong independent prognostic factors with a significant impact on long-term outcome, but lose their power and significance over time. Including all patients, LRR was the strongest prognostic factor for OS and distant DFS (resp. HR 5.01 and HR 5.31, p < 0.001). In the subgroup of patients developing a LRR after at least 5 or 10 years, LRR remained the strongest independent prognostic factor for OS (resp. HR 3.98, HR 4.96, p ⩽ 0.001) and distant DFS (HR 4.42, HR 7.57 p < 0.001).ConclusionThis is the first study which shows LRR after breast-conserving therapy is a very strong, time-independent prognostic factor for long term outcome in early stage breast cancer patients. These findings suggest that a LRR after a long event-free interval seems to be an indicator rather than an instigator of subsequent distant disease.     

Survival impact of postoperative radiotherapy in patients with olfactory neuroblastoma: 513 cases from the SEER database

PuposeTo evaluate the impact of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) on survival in olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB) patients with different tumor staging.Material and methodsPatients with ONB were selected in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database from 2004–2016. Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan–Meier (K-M) method, Cox regression analysis, and competing risk model.ResultsA total of 513 patients were included in the study. Univariate and multivariate analysis results demonstrated that PORT was not an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (OS) of modified Kadish stage A and B patients (P = 0.699 and P = 0.248, respectively). Kadish stage C and D patients who underwent PORT had significantly better OS than those who did not undergo PORT (P = 0.03 and P < 0.0001). K-M curves revealed that the 5- and 10-year OS rates of patients who underwent PORT vs. non-PORT were 85.3% vs. 70.4% and 68.2% vs. 56.8% in stage C patients, respectively. For stage D patients, the 5-year OS rates were 70.7% and 42.6%, and 10-year OS rates were 53.4% and 29.5% in the PORT and non-PORT groups, respectively. The competitive risk model revealed that the 5-year cancer-specific cumulative mortality incidence decreased by 26.6% while the 10-year mortality incidence decreased by 41.4% in Kadish stage C patients who were treated using PORT; meanwhile, for Kadish stage D patients who were treated with PORT, the 5- and 10-year mortality incidences were reduced by 35.3% and 42.6%, respectively. Furthermore, we found that chemotherapy was not related to the prognosis of ONB patients (all P > 0.05).ConclusionOur results indicate that PORT improved survival outcomes of modified Kadish stage C and D ONB patients. However, PORT may not affect survival for modified Kadish stage A and B individuals. Chemotherapy was not recommended for ONB; therefore, further studies are warranted to determine its therapeutic significance.     

Impact of age on the efficacy of oxaliplatin in the preoperative chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy of rectal cancer: a post hoc analysis of the CAO/ARO/AIO-04 phase III trial

BackgroundThe German rectal cancer trial CAO/ARO/AIO-04 has shown a significant benefit in 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) of adding oxaliplatin to a standard preoperative 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. The use of oxaliplatin as adjuvant treatment in elderly patients with colon cancer is controversial. We therefore investigated the impact of age on clinical outcome in the CAO/ARO/AIO-04 phase III trial.Patients and methodsWe carried out a post hoc analysis of the CAO/ARO/AIO-04 phase III trial evaluating primary and secondary end points according to age. Patient and tumor characteristics, NCI CTC adverse events grades 3–4 (version 3.0), dose intensities as well as survival and recurrence data were analyzed in three specified age groups (<60, 60–70, and ≥70 years). The influence of age as a continuous variable on DFS was modeled using a subpopulation treatment effect pattern plot (STEPP) analysis.ResultsA total of 1232 patients were assessable. With the exception of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status (P < 0.001), no differences in patient and tumor characteristics were noticed between age groups. Likewise, toxicity pattern, dose intensities of CRT and surgical results were similar in all age groups. After a median follow-up of 50 months, in patients aged <60 years a significant benefit of adding oxaliplatin to 5-FU-based CRT and adjuvant chemotherapy was observed for local (P = 0.013) and systemic recurrences (P = 0.023), DFS (P = 0.011), and even overall survival (OS; P = 0.044). The STEPP analysis revealed improved hazard ratios for DFS in patients aged 40–70 years compared with elderly patients treated with oxaliplatin.ConclusionThe addition of oxaliplatin significantly improved DFS and OS in younger patients aged <60 years with advanced rectal cancer. Patients aged ≥70 years had no benefit.Clinical Trials NumberNCT00349076     

Adjuvant low-dose interferon α2a with or without dacarbazine compared with surgery alone: a prospective-randomized phase III DeCOG trial in melanoma patients with regional lymph node metastasis

BackgroundMore than half of patients with melanoma that has spread to regional lymph nodes develop recurrent disease within the first 3 years after surgery. The aim of the study was to improve disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) with interferon (IFN) α2a with or without dacarbazine (DTIC) compared with observation alone.Patients and methodsA total of 444 patients from 42 centers of the German Dermatologic Cooperative Oncology Group who had received a complete lymph node dissection for pathologically proven regional node involvement were randomized to receive either 3 MU s.c. of IFNα2a three times a week for 2 years (Arm A) or combined treatment with same doses of IFNα2a plus DTIC 850 mg/m² every 4–8 weeks for 2 years (Arm B) or to observation alone (Arm C). Treatment was discontinued at first sign of relapse.ResultsA total of 441 patients were eligible for intention-to-treat analysis. Kaplan–Meier 4-year OS rate of those who had received IFNα2a was 59%. For those with surgery alone, survival was 42% (A versus C, P = 0.0045). No improvement of survival was found for the combined treatment Arm B with 45% survival rate (B versus C, P = 0.76). Similarly, DFS rates showed significant benefit for Arm A, and not for Arm B. Multivariate Cox model confirmed that Arm A has an impact on OS (P = 0.005) but not Arm B (P = 0.34).Conclusions3 MU interferon α2a given s.c. three times a week for 2 years significantly improved OS and DFS in patients with melanoma that had spread to the regional lymph nodes. Interestingly, the addition of DTIC reversed the beneficial effect of adjuvant interferon α2a therapy.     

Utility of the CPS + EG staging system in hormone receptor-positive,human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy

BackgroundPathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) correlates with overall survival (OS) in primary breast cancer. A recently described staging system based on pre-treatment clinical stage (CS), final pathological stage (PS), estrogen receptor (ER) status and nuclear grade (NG) leads to a refined estimation of prognosis in unselected patients. Its performance in luminal type breast cancers has not been determined. This study investigates the clinical utility of this CPS + EG score when restricted to hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2–) patients and compares the results to a cohort of unselected patients.MethodsThe CPS + EG score was calculated for 6637 unselected patients and 2454 patients with HR + /HER2− tumours who received anthracycline/taxane-based NACT within 8 prospective German trials.ResultsFive-year disease-free survival (DFS) and OS were 75.6% and 84.1% for the unselected cohort and 80.6% and 87.8% for the HR + /HER2− subgroup, respectively. The CPS + EG system distinguished different prognostic groups with 5-year DFS ranging from 0% to 91%. The CPS + EG system leads to an improved categorisation of patients by outcome compared to CS, PS, ER or NG alone. When applying the CPS + EG score to the HR + /HER2− subgroup, a shift to lower scores was observed compared to the overall population, but 5-year DFS and OS for the individual scores were identical to that observed in the overall population.ConclusionsIn HR + /HER2− patients, the CPS + EG staging system retains its ability to facilitate a refined stratification of patients according to outcome. It can help to select candidates for post-neoadjuvant clinical trials in luminal breast cancer.     

To predict progression-free survival and overall survival in metastatic renal cancer treated with sorafenib: pilot study using dynamic contrast-enhanced Doppler ultrasound

IntroductionThe objective of this study was to evaluate dynamic contrast-enhanced Doppler ultrasound (DCE-US) with perfusion software (Vascular Recognition Imaging) and contrast agent injection as a predictor of tumour response, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).Patients and methodsThirty patients with a metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) already enrolled in a double-blind randomised study were evaluated. Examinations were performed at baseline, and after 3 and 6 weeks on sorafenib or a placebo in patients with tumour targets that were accessible to DCE-US.ResultsA total of 85 examinations were performed, 30 at baseline, 28 at 3 weeks and 27 at 6 weeks. The combination of a decrease in contrast uptake exceeding 10% and stability or a decrease in tumour volume allowed us to discriminate seven good responders and 20 poor responders at 3 weeks. There was a statistically significant difference in PFS (p = 10⁻⁴) and OS (p = 10⁻⁴) between good and poor responders.ConclusionDCE-US is a new noninvasive imaging technique which might be an effective tool for evaluating antiangiogenic drugs in renal cancer.     

A randomized, dose-response, multicenter phase II study of radium-223 chloride for the palliation of painful bone metastases in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer

PurposeTo investigate the dose–response relationship and pain-relieving effect of radium-223, a highly bone-targeted alpha-pharmaceutical.MethodsOne hundred patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and painful bone metastases were randomized to a single intravenous dose of 5, 25, 50 or 100 kBq/kg radium-223. The primary end-point was pain index (visual analogue scale [VAS] and analgesic use), also used to classify patients as responders or non-responders.ResultsA significant dose response for pain index was seen at week 2 (P = .035). At week 8 there were 40%, 63%, 56% and 71% pain responders (reduced pain and stable analgesic consumption) in the 5, 25, 50 and 100 kBq/kg groups, respectively. On the daily VAS, at week 8, pain decreased by a mean of −30, −31, −27 and −28 mm, respectively (P = .008, P = .0005, P = .002, and P < .0001) in these responders (post-hoc analysis). There was also a significant improvement in the brief pain inventory functional index for all dose-groups (P = .04, .01, .002 and .02, Wilcoxon signed rank test). Furthermore, a decrease in bone alkaline phosphatase in the highest dose-group was demonstrated (P = .0067). All doses were safe and well tolerated.ConclusionPain response was seen in up to 71% of the patients with a dose response observed 2 weeks after administration. The highly tolerable side-effect profile of radium-223 previously reported was confirmed.     

Results of external-beam radiotherapy alone in invasive cancer of the uterine cervix: a retrospective analysis

AimsIn this retrospective audit, we describe the results of external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) alone in patients with invasive cancer of the cervix treated at our centre.Material and MethodsWe included 146 patients with invasive cancer of the cervix who were treated with EBRT to a total dose of 60–66 Gy between January 1996 and December 2001. None of these patients were suitable for intracavitary radiotherapy (ICRT) after a median dose of 46 Gy. A boost dose of 14–20 Gy was given after a gap of 2–4 weeks. Most patients belonged to stage IIIB (n = 124).ResultsFollow-up of patients at risk ranged from 19 to 89 months (median 48 months). One hundred and thirty-six patients (93.2%) received EBRT to a dose of 66 Gy, and 10 patients (6.8%) received 60 Gy. Overall treatment time (OTT) ranged from 56 to 160 days (median 78 days). At completion of 46 Gy of EBRT, 63 patients achieved partial response and 83 patients had stable disease. Five-year overall survival, disease-free survival (DFS) and pelvic control were 15.1% (median 9 months), 11.6% (median 5 months) and 21.9% (median 6 months), respectively. Factors found to affect 5-year pelvic control in univariate analysis by Kaplan–Meier method were response to EBRT at 46 Gy (partial response 36.5% and stable disease 10.8%), age (≥50 years 28.8% and <50 years 13.6%) and OTT (<90 days 26.5% and ≥90 days 12.5%). For DFS and overall survival, response to EBRT was the only factor that was significant in univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis by Cox's proportional hazard model, response to EBRT was the only factor to influence pelvic control (P = 0.007), DFS (P = 0.01) and overall survival (P < 0.001).ConclusionsOverall outcome of patients in whom ICRT was not given remains less than satisfactory. Response to EBRT emerged as the most important factor to predict all clinical outcomes. To improve upon the dismal results of EBRT alone, we will have to decrease the OTT and consider concurrent chemo-radiation with cisplatin.     

A randomised trial comparing preoperative to perioperative chemotherapy in early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (IFCT 0002 trial)

HypothesisThere will be a detectable increase in overall survival (OS) using preoperative (PRE) as opposed to perioperative (PERI) chemotherapy in resectable Stage I–II non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).MethodsThis multicenter, open-label, randomised trial with a 2 × 2 factorial design first compared two chemotherapy strategies (PRE versus PERI), then two chemotherapy regimens (gemcitabine–cisplatin [GP] versus paclitaxel–carboplatin [TC]). The PRE group received two preoperative cycles followed by two additional preoperative cycles, while the PERI group underwent two preoperative cycles followed by two postoperative cycles, the 3rd and 4th cycles being given only to responders in both cases.ResultsA total of 528 patients were randomised, 267 of which were assigned to the PRE group and 261 to the PERI group. Three-year OS did not differ between the two groups (67.4% and 67.7%, respectively; hazard ratio (HR) = 1.01 [0.79–1.30], p = 0.92), nor did 3-year disease-free survival, response rates, toxicity, or postoperative mortality. Pathological complete response was observed in 22 (8.2%) and 16 patients (6.1%), respectively. Although quality of life did not differ significantly, chemotherapy compliance was significantly higher in the PRE group. The proportion of responders who received Cycles 3 and 4 was significantly higher in the PRE group (90.4% versus 75.2%, p = 0.001). In responders, the dose intensity of Cycles 3 and 4 was higher in the PRE group than in the PERI group (mean relative dose intensity of 90.4% versus 82.6%, respectively; p = 0.0007). There was no difference between GP and TC in 3-year OS (HR = 0.97 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.76–1.25], p = 0.80) or response rates. However, the regimens’ toxicity profiles differed.ConclusionsThis study failed to demonstrate any difference in survival between patients receiving preoperative and perioperative chemotherapy in early-stage NSCLC. The increase from two to four preoperative chemotherapy cycles did not increase the pathological response rate.