The role of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound in patients with adnexal masses

AIMS: To evaluate the accuracy of ultrasonography (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in characterizing adnexal masses, and to determine which patients may benefit from MRI. METHODS: We prospectively studied 72 women (mean age 53 years, range 19 to 86 years) with clinically suspected adnexal masses. A single experienced sonographer performed transabdominal and transvaginal greyscale spectral and colour Doppler examinations. MRI was carried out on a 1.5T system using T1, T2 and fat-suppressed T1-weighted sequences before and after intravenous injection of gadolinium. The adnexal masses were categorized as benign or malignant without knowledge of clinical details, according to the imaging features which were compared with the surgical and pathological findings. RESULTS: For characterizing lesions as malignant, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of MRI were 96.6%, 83.7% and 88.9%, respectively, and of US were 100%, 39.5% and 63.9%, respectively. MRI was more specific (p<0.05) than US. Both MRI and US correctly diagnosed 17 (24%) cases with benign and 28 (39%) cases with malignant masses. MRI correctly diagnosed 19 (26%) cases with benign lesion(s), which on US were thought to be malignant. The age, menopausal status and CA-125 levels in these women made benign disease likely, but US features were suggestive of malignancy (large masses and solid-cystic lesions with nodules). CONCLUSION: MRI is more specific and accurate than US and Doppler assessment for characterizing adnexal masses. Women who clinically have a relatively low risk of malignancy but who have complex sonographic features may benefit from MRI.     

Detection and characterization of adnexal masses

The main challenge to the radiologist is to differentiate benign from malignant adnexal masses. Both US and MRI perform well for prediction of benignity. There is less specificity for diagnosis of malignancy but features, such as papillary projections, thickened septations, and internal vascularity within nodules, aid in this differentiation. The combination of morphology and Doppler characteristics provide the most accurate US diagnosis. For sonographically indeterminate masses, MRI is useful for additional lesion characterization. Analysis of T1- and T2-weighted signal intensities for benign-appearing lesions with the addition of fat saturation for high signal on T1-weighted sequences may lead to an exact diagnosis or a narrow differential. For cases considered suspicious by TVUS, more specific diagnosis by MRI may obviate the need for surgery or otherwise change management by identification of benign etiology.     

Contrast-enhanced 3.0-T breast MRI for characterization of breast lesions: increased specificity by using vascular maps

Purpose: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced 3.0-T breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for differentiating benign from malignant breast masses and subsequently to test if specificity could be further improved by scoring of the overall ipsilateral breast vascularity. Materials and methods: Fifty-four patients were prospectively enrolled in the study and underwent contrast-enhanced 3.0-T breast MRI. MR images were evaluated and classified according to the MRI BI-RADS lexicon criteria. Lesion size, number of lesions, and localization in the breast were systematically assessed. Maximum intensity projections (MIPS) were obtained by using high-resolution contrast-enhanced (0.1 mmol/kg gadobutrol) fat-saturated T1-weighted images. Breast vascularization was scored according to the methods from Sardanelli et al. by measuring the number, diameter, and length of the vessels on the MIPS. The score ranged from 0 (indicating absent or low breast vascularity) to 3 (indicating high breast vascularity). Results: Final analysis of 56 lesions revealed 25 (45%) malignant lesions and 31 (55%) benign lesions. Correlation with the MRI BI-RADS classification revealed cancer in none (0%) of the BI-RADS II lesions, in 1 (12%) of the BI-RADS III lesions, in 5 (83%) of the BI-RADS IV lesions, and in 19 (100%) of the BI-RADS V lesions. Based on morphologic and kinetic data analysis, the sensitivity and specificity of 3.0-T breast MRI was 100% (25/25) and 74% (23/31), respectively. After adjustment for the breast vascularity score, specificity significantly (p = 0.048) increased to 87% (27/31) without affecting sensitivity. Conclusion: Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced 3.0-T breast MRI increased significantly when the vascularity score was added to the standard morphologic and kinetic data analysis, resulting in a specificity of 87% without affecting sensitivity, which remained 100%.     

Preoperative diagnosis of ovarian tumors with MR imaging: comparison with transvaginal sonography, positron emission tomography, and histologic findings.

OBJECTIVE: Our study evaluated the diagnostic performance of MR imaging compared with that of transvaginal sonography and positron emission tomography (PET) in patients with clinically asymptomatic adnexal findings. An additional goal was to determine whether the combination of the three methods enhanced their diagnostic accuracy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Included in the study were 103 women with suspicious adnexal findings on sonography. Patients underwent transvaginal sonography, MR imaging, and PET within 3 weeks of the initial sonography. For MR imaging, axial and sagittal T1-weighted gradient-echo sequences (unenhanced and enhanced) and T2-weighted turbo-spin-echo sequences were acquired. Transvaginal sonography was performed with a 7.5-MHz transducer head. For PET, a modern full-ring scanner was used. The results of diagnostic imaging techniques were first evaluated separately, and reviewers were blinded to the results of other methods. Finally, a second session resulted in a consensus diagnosis based on the findings of all three methods. Results of histology were considered the gold standard. RESULTS: Histology revealed 12 malignant and 91 benign ovarian tumors. The following data were calculated for MR imaging, transvaginal sonography, PET, and consensus diagnosis: sensitivities, 83%, 92%, 58%, 92%; specificities, 84%, 59%, 78%, 84%; diagnostic accuracies, 83%, 63%, 76%, 85%, respectively. MR imaging, particularly with contrast-enhanced fat-saturated T1-weighted sequences, was found to correctly reveal dermoid and endometrial cysts. All three methods had false-negative findings with borderline tumors. CONCLUSION: Transvaginal sonography is the diagnostic method of choice as a screening technique for ovarian processes. Suspicious findings on transvaginal sonography should be confirmed on MR imaging. If MR imaging confirms a dermoid or endometrial cyst, further diagnostic procedures may be unnecessary. In all other cases, a surgical evaluation must be considered.     

The value of magnetic resonance imaging in the differentiation between malignant peripheral nerve-sheath tumors and non-neurogenic malignant soft-tissue tumors

Objective To assess the sensitivity and specificity of MRI criteria in the differentiation between malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST) and non-neurogenic malignant soft-tissue tumors (MSTT).Design and patients MRI examinations of 105 patients with pathologically proven malignant soft-tissue lesions (35 MPNST and 70 MSTT) were retrospectively reviewed, the reviewers being unaware of the pathological diagnosis. Using a standardized protocol, the tumors were evaluated for multiple parameters regarding morphology and appearance on different sequences before and after gadolinium contrast administration (location, distribution, delineation, homogeneity, size, shape, relationship to bone and neurovascular bundle, intralesional hemorrhage, necrosis, perilesional edema, lymphangitis and signal intensities). Results were compared using a chi-square or Fisher’s exact test.Results MRI findings suggestive of MPNST (p<0,05) were intermuscular distribution, location on the course of a large nerve, nodular morphology, and overall non-homogeneity on T1-weighted images, T2-weighted images and T1-weighted images after gadolinium contrast injection. MRI findings in favor of MSTT were intramuscular distribution, ill-delineated appearance of more than 20% of the lesion’s circumference, and presence of intralesional blood vessels, perilesional edema and lymphangitis. There is no significant difference for degree and pattern of enhancement after gadolinium contrast injection, nor for presence of bone involvement or cystic or necrotic areas.Conclusion MRI provides several features that contribute to the differentiation between MPNST and non-neurogenic malignant soft-tissue tumors. MRI findings suggestive of MPNST should be helpful to pathologists in the strategy for further examination.     

F18-FDG coincidence-PET in patients with suspected gynecological malignancy

Purpose: To assess the role of F18-FDG imaging with a dual-head coincidence mode gamma camera (Co-PET) in identifying malignant tumors in patients with a suspicious adnexal mass depicted by conventional imaging methods.

Material and Methods: F18-FDG Co-PET was performed preoperatively in 18 women (mean age 56.38 years) with suspected malignant gynecologic tumors according to clinical and abdomino-pelvic/transvaginal ultrasound or computed tomography findings. Exploratory laparotomy was performed in all patients within the 10 days post-F18-FDG Co-PET study, and the definitive diagnosis of the adnexal masses was established by histopathological examination.

Results: Histopathological examinations of the surgically excised adnexal masses revealed eight malignant, one borderline, and nine benign neoplastic tumors. Four benign tumors had no F18-FDG uptake, while the remaining five tumors, all leiomyomas, showed mild FDG accumulation. Eight malignant tumors showed intense F18-FDG uptake. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of F18-FDG co-PET in differentiating benign from malign adnexal masses were 88%, 44%, 61%, and 80%, respectively. Tumor to background ratios (T/B) in benign lesions (2.04 ± 0.27) were significantly lower than in malignant lesions (7.4 ± 0.99).

Conclusion: F18-FDG Co-PET is of clinical value when assessing suspicious malignant adnexal masses. False-negative F18-FDG results might arise from borderline disease. Moderate F18-FDG uptake in leiomyomas can result false-positive, but T/B ratios may be helpful in such cases.     

Asymptomatic adnexal masses: correlation of FDG PET and histopathologic findings

PURPOSE: To analyze asymptomatic adnexal masses at positron emission tomography (PET) with fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) in correlation with histopathologic findings and evaluate FDG PET for assessing malignancy in comparison with transvaginal B-mode and Doppler ultrasonography (US) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-nine patients underwent static FDG PET of the abdomen. US scans were evaluated according to sonomorphologic scoring systems. Resistance index of tumor blood vessels was calculated. Transverse and sagittal T1-weighted MR images obtained before and after intravenous administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine with a fat-saturation technique and T2-weighted MR images were acquired at 1.5 T. Adnexal mass malignancy was first assessed with each modality and then with a combination of the three techniques. Final diagnosis was made with histopathologic evaluation. RESULTS: FDG PET depicted seven of 12 malignant and 66 of 87 benign asymptomatic adnexal tumors. False-negative PET results were obtained in five of seven stage pT1a cystadenocarcinomas and tumors of low malignant potential but not in advanced-stage ovarian carcinomas. Small moderately intense FDG accumulations in the lower pelvis were caused by benign adnexal tumors or gastrointestinal activity in 21 of 27 cases. The overall sensitivities and specificities were 58% (95% CI: 27.7, 84.8) and 76% (95% CI: 65.5, 84.4), respectively, for FDG PET; 92% (95% CI: 61.5, 99.8) and 60% (95% CI: 48.7, 70.1), respectively, for US; 83% (95% CI: 51.6, 97.7) and 84% (95% CI: 74.5, 90.9), respectively, for MR imaging; and 92% (95% CI: 61.5, 99.8) and 85% (95% CI: 75.8, 91.8), respectively, for the combination of three modalities. CONCLUSION: Since the sensitivity of US is as high as that of PET, MR imaging, and the combination of three modalities, it remains the method of choice for diagnosis and assessment of asymptomatic adnexal masses.     

Diagnosis of breast tumors by contrast-enhanced MR imaging: comparison between the diagnostic performance of dynamic enhancement patterns and morphologic features

PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic performance of breast lesions by the enhancement patterns and morphologic criteria on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Both T1-weighted 3D gradient-echo sequences with high temporal resolution and high-spatial-resolution MRI were performed on 190 patients with a total of 204 enhancing lesions (144 malignant and 60 benign). The enhancement patterns and morphologic features of each mass and nonmass lesion were analyzed, and the diagnostic performance was compared. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of the morphologic criteria were statistically significantly higher than those of the enhancement patterns (sensitivity: P = 0.0012, specificity: P = 0.0003), and the A(z) values for the three observers were 0.900, 0.919, and 0.900. The diagnostic accuracy of the morphologic criteria for both types of lesions was superior, and the differences were statistically significant (mass: P = 0.0001, nonmass: P = 0.0389). CONCLUSION: The analysis of the morphologic features of enhancing breast lesions alone showed higher diagnostic performance; therefore, signal intensity (SI) time-course data may not be needed to diagnose malignant breast lesions.     

Critical role of spatial resolution in dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI

The spatial resolution of three-dimensional (3D) gradient-echo T1-weighted images, from 40 women with 25 malignant and 23 benign lesions, was purposely degraded to determine the role of spatial resolution in recording, analysis, and diagnosis of dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI. Images were recorded and analyzed at pixel resolution according to the 3TP method (Degani et al., Nat Med 1997;3:780-782). Reduction in spatial resolution degraded the appearance of foci with fast wash-in and fast washout dynamics. This resulted in an increase in false-negative diagnoses. The sensitivity for differentiating between malignant and benign lesions, using threshold criteria defined by the 3TP analysis, of 76% decreased to 60% and 24% for a 2- and 4-fold reduction in spatial resolution, respectively, without affecting significantly the high specificity (96-100%). In order to minimize false-negative diagnoses of contrast-enhanced breast MRI and maintain high specificity, it is essential to record and analyze the dynamic behavior at high spatial resolution. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2001;13:862-867.     

Diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT in characterizing ovarian lesions and staging ovarian cancer: correlation with transvaginal ultrasonography, computed tomography, and histology

AIMS: To (a) assess the accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT in distinguishing malignant from benign pelvic lesions, compared to transvaginal ultrasonography (TVUS) and (b) to establish the role of whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT, compared to contrast enhanced computed tomography (CT), in staging patients with ovarian cancer. PATIENTS: Fifty consecutive patients with a pelvic lesion, already scheduled for surgery on the basis of physical examination, TVUS, and serum Ca125 levels, were enrolled in the study. Patients' age ranged between 23 and 89 years (mean 64). All patients underwent TVUS including a colour Doppler study followed by a thorax and abdominal CT scan, and whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT within 2 weeks prior to surgery. Histological findings obtained at surgery were taken as the 'gold standard' to compare 18F-FDG PET/CT and TVUS, and 18F-FDG PET/CT vs. CT. When tissue analysis showed ovarian cancer, the accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT and CT were compared for the purpose of obtaining a precise staging. RESULTS: At surgery, the ovarian lesions were malignant in 32/50 patients (64%) and benign in the remaining 18/50 patients (36%). The sensitivity, specificity, NPV, PPV and accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT were 87%, 100%, 81%, 100% and 92%, respectively, compared with 90%, 61%, 78%, 80% and 80%, respectively, for TVUS. In staging ovarian cancer, 18F-FDG PET/CT results were concordant with final pathological staging in 22/32 (69%) patients while CT results were concordant in 17/32 (53%) patients. CT incorrectly down-staged four out of six stage IV patients by missing distant metastasis in the liver, pleura, mediastinum, and in left supraclavicular lymph nodes, which were correctly detected by 18F-FDG PET/CT. CONCLUSION: PET/CT with 18F-FDG provides additional value to TVUS for the differential diagnosis of benign from malignant pelvic lesions, and to CT for the staging of ovarian cancer patients.     

Detection and classification of different liver lesions: Comparison of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI versus multiphasic spiral CT in a clinical single centre investigation

Objective

To compare the diagnostic efficacy of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) vs. multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) for the detection and classification of focal liver lesions, differentiated also for lesion entity and size; a separate analysis of pre- and postcontrast images as well as T2-weighted MRI sequences of focal and exclusively solid lesions was integrated.

Methods

Twenty-nine patients with 130 focal liver lesions underwent MDCT (64-detector-row; contrast medium iopromide; native, arterial, portalvenous, venous phase) and MRI (1.5-T; dynamic and tissue-specific phase 20 min after application of Gd-EOB-DTPA). Hepatic lesions were verified against a standard of reference (SOR). CT and MR images were independently analysed by four blinded radiologists on an ordinal 6-point-scale, determining lesion classification and diagnostic confidence.

Results

Among 130 lesions, 68 were classified as malignant and 62 as benign by SOR. The detection of malignant and benign lesions differed significantly between combined and postcontrast MRI vs. MDCT; overall detection rate was 91.5% for combined MRI and 80.4% for combined MDCT (p < 0.05). Considering all four readers together, combined MDCT achieved sensitivity of 66.2%, specificity of 79.0%, and diagnostic accuracy of 72.3%; combined MRI reached superior diagnostic efficacy: sensitivity 86.8%, specificity 94.4%, accuracy 90.4% (p < 0.05). Differentiated for lesion size, in particular lesions <20 mm revealed diagnostic benefit by MRI. Postcontrast MRI also achieved higher overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy compared to postcontrast MDCT for focal and exclusively solid liver lesions (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Combined and postcontrast Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI provided significantly higher overall detection rate and diagnostic accuracy, including low inter-observer variability, compared to MDCT in a single centre study.     

The identification of the criteria of malignancy and the tissue characterization of expansive processes in periskeletal soft tissues. The current role of magnetic resonance

INTRODUCTION: Expansive masses arising from periskeletal soft tissues are a frequent challenge for the imaging specialist. Lesion diagnosis and characterization, and the assessment of benign/malignant nature are very important factors for treatment planning. We investigated MR capabilities in distinguishing benign from malignant masses and for histopathologic lesion characterization, also in the light of the latest most authoritative literature reports. MATERIAL AND METHODS: February 1995 to November 1997, we examined 237 patients with known space-occupying lesions arising from periskeletal soft tissues. T1- and PD/T2-weighted SE images were acquired on the most suitable planes. The findings were independently evaluated by two groups of radiologists who were asked a benignity/malignancy judgment based on specific morphological criteria and then a presumptive histopathologic characterization. The results were then compared with pathologic findings. RESULTS: We had high agreement rates for benignity/malignancy judgements, with only < or = 3.8% error rates. In contrast, rates were quite variable for histopathologic characterization and differed greatly by lesion type. The lesions, defined as malignant, could not be characterized histologically in approximately 18% of cases by both groups. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Our results, which are in substantial agreement with the recent authoritative literature, confirm MRI as an extremely reliable tool for distinguishing benign from malignant expansive masses arising from periskeletal soft tissues. On the contrary, MRI exhibits good specificity in histopathologic characterization only for the masses with such development as to permit identification of the anatomical compartment of origin, which are usually benign, as well as the masses with typical or pathognomonic tissue signal.     

Complex US adnexal masses during pregnancy: Is pelvic MR imaging accurate for characterization?

ObjectiveTo retrospectively evaluate the accuracy of pelvic magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for the characterization of complex sonographic adnexal masses discovered in women during pregnancy.Study designThe study population comprised 31 pregnant women (median age: 32 years (range: 19–42); mean gestation age of 16 weeks) referred to our institution for MR imaging for characterization of an adnexal mass discovered incidentally during routine ultrasound (US) for other indications. The population comprised of 31 women, with 36 adnexal lesions (mean size: 103 mm [range: 20–290]), of which 27 were benign and 9 were malignant masses. Prospective US and MR reports were reviewed to determine the presence of a benign or malignant lesion. Two radiologists (R1 and R2) blinded to the final outcome, retrospectively evaluated the MR images using the criteria based on the A_DNEXMR-S_CORE and classified the lesion as benign or malignant. The reference standard was surgical pathology or at least a 1-year imaging follow-up.ResultsProspective US and MR imaging correctly identified the diagnosis in 27/36 (75%) (95% confidence interval (CI): 58.9%–86.2%) and in 32/36 (88.9%) (95% CI: 74.6%–95.6%) of lesions, respectively. MR imaging with A_DNEXMR-S_CORE allowed a correct diagnosis in 32/36 (88.9%) (95% CI: 74.6%–95.6%) of lesions for R1 and in 30/36 (83.3%) (95% CI: 68.1%–92.1%) of lesions for R2. The sensitivities and specificities of MR imaging using the MR A_DNEXMR-S_CORE were 100% (95% CI: 70.1%–1000%) for both readers and 85.1% (95% CI: 67.5%–94%) and 77.7% (95% CI: 59.2%–89.4%) for R1 and R2, respectively. No malignancy was classified as benign using MR criteria. The reproducibility between the two readers was almost perfect, with a kappa of 0.914.ConclusionMR imaging is highly accurate for the characterization of complex adnexal masses incidentally discovered during pregnancy.Clinical relevanceMR imaging can accurately characterize adnexal masses in pregnancy and could be useful in opting for expectant management until delivery.     

Detection of breast cancer with conventional mammography and contrast-enhanced MR imaging

The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of conventional mammography and dynamic contrast-enhanced fast 3D gradient-echo (GRE) MRI regarding the detection and characterization of breast lesions relative to histopathologic analysis and to assess the results of a combined evaluation of both methods. fifty consecutive patients with 63 histopathologically verified breast lesions underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced GRE MRI in addition to routine conventional mammography. All lesions were classified by both methods on a five-point scale as benign or malignant, and the results were correlated to histopathology. Conventional mammography and dynamic MRI yielded a sensitivity and specificity of 82 and 64 %, and 92 and 76 %, respectively. The difference between the results was statistically not significant (p > 0.05) with areas under the receiver-operating-characteristics curves of 0.807 for mammography and 0.906 for MR imaging. Combination of the results of both methods slightly increased the sensitivity for detection of breast cancer to 95 % but decreased specificity to 52 %. In this selected patient subset, including only patients referred for excisional biopsy, contrast-enhanced dynamic MRI proved more sensitive and specific than conventional mammography regarding the detection of malignancy. While a combination of both methods yields a slightly improved sensitivity, specificity is vastly reduced. Received 5 May 1997; Revision received 14 July 1997; Accepted 7 August 1997     

Prostate dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with simple visual diagnostic criteria: is it reasonable?

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of prostate cancer localization with simple visual diagnostic criteria using dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). A total of 46 consecutive patients with biopsy-proven prostate cancer underwent prostate 1.5 T MRI with pelvic phased-array coils before prostatectomy. Besides the usual T2-weighted sequences, a 30-s DCE sequence was acquired three times after gadoterate injection. On DCE images, all early enhancing lesions of the peripheral zone were considered malignant. In the central gland, only early enhancing lesions appearing homogeneous or invading the peripheral zone were considered malignant. Three readers specified the presence of cancer in 20 prostate sectors and the location of distinct tumors. Results were compared with histology; p < 0.05 was considered significant. For localization of cancer in the sectors, DCE imaging had a significantly higher sensitivity [logistic regression, odds ratio (OR): 3.9, p < 0.0001] and a slightly but significantly lower specificity (OR: 0.57, p < 0.0001). Of the tumors >0.3 cc, 50–60% and 78–81% were correctly depicted with T2-weighted and DCE imaging, respectively. For both techniques, the depiction rate of tumors >0.3 cc was significantly influenced by the Gleason score (most Gleason ≤6 tumors were overlooked), but not by the tumor volume. Conclusion: DCE-MRI using pelvic phased-array coils and simple visual diagnostic criteria is more sensitive for tumor localization than T2-weighted imaging.     

Gadolinium-DOTA enhanced MR imaging of adnexal tumors

We conducted a retrospective study to assess the potential of contrast enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in evaluating adnexal tumors. Sixty patients with a total of 77 pelvic lesions underwent MR imaging at 1.5 T and transabdominal ultrasound (US). Precontrast T1- and T2-weighted and Gd-DOTA enhanced T1-weighted MR images were obtained. Diagnoses were proved by surgery in 57 patients. Of the 77 lesions, 54 masses were of ovarian origin, including 12 malignant disorders. Ultrasound demonstrated the lesions in 92%, whereas the sensitivity of unenhanced T2-weighted and postcontrast MR images was 98 and 96%, respectively. Compared to the T2-weighted images, postcontrast MR imaging showed superior overall tumor delineation, assessment of intratumoral architecture, and definition of tumor origin. Contrast enhancement of tumors did not differ significantly between normal ovary and benign and malignant lesions. All modalities were unable to predict malignancy of complex lesions. Based on our study, US remains the screening modality of choice in the evaluation of adnexal tumors. Contrast enhanced MR imaging may be valuable for assessing complex lesions or when the origin of the mass cannot be determined by US. Using contrast enhanced T1-weighted images instead of T2-weighted images may lead to a significant reduction in acquisition time.     

US, colour-Doppler US and fine-needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to correlate the diagnosis of benign or malignant thyroid nodules obtained with grey-scale ultrasound (US) and colour-Doppler US with the cytological findings after US-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2004 and June 2005, 516 thyroid nodules in 420 patients (181 solitary thyroid nodules and 239 multiple nodules) were prospectively evaluated with US, colour-Doppler US and US-guided FNA. The nodules were classified as sonographically benign, suspicious or malignant in accordance with established US criteria. Cytological findings were classified as inadequate, benign, indeterminate, suspicious or malignant. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and diagnostic accuracy of US and colour-Doppler US were evaluated using FNA as the reference procedure. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and overall accuracy values of grey-scale US were 46%, 73%, 34%, 82% and 67%, respectively, for solitary thyroid nodules and 35%, 72%, 14%, 90% and 68%, respectively, for multiple nodules. The evaluation of nodule vascularity with colour-Doppler US produced a slight increase in sensitivity but a slight reduction in specificity. CONCLUSIONS: Thyroid nodules cannot be accurately characterised using grey-scale US or colour-Doppler US.     

Can unenhanced multiparametric MRI substitute gadolinium-enhanced MRI in the characterization of vertebral marrow infiltrative lesions?

Purpose

To assess the diagnostic effectiveness of unenhanced-multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp MRI) as an alternative to gadolinium (Gad)-enhanced MRI in the characterization of vertebral marrow infiltrative lesions.

Patients and methods

A prospective evaluation of fifty-six patients with suspected or untreated vertebral metastases undergoing MRI of the spine at 1.5 T was carried out. Two groups of sequences were assigned and compared for the characterization of marrow infiltrative lesions: group [A] unenhanced-mp MRI (including T1-weighted, T2-weighted, short time inversion recovery (STIR), diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and in/opposed phase sequences) and group [B] gadolinium-enhanced MRI (including T1-weighted, T2-weighted, STIR and T1-weighted fat-suppressed gadolinium-enhanced sequence). Qualitative and quantitative image analysis was performed and compared. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy for both imaging techniques were calculated.

Results

There was no statistical significant difference between unenhanced-multiparametric MRI and gadolinium-enhanced MRI as regards their diagnostic performance in differentiating benign from malignant vertebral marrow infiltrative lesions (p > 0.05) with calculated sensitivity (94% vs. 97%), specificity (92% vs. 88%), positive predictive value (94% vs. 91%), negative predictive value (92% vs. 95%) and (93% vs. 93%) accuracy.

Conclusion

Unenhanced-multiparametric MRI is compatible with gadolinium-enhanced MRI in reliable characterization of marrow infiltrative lesions. The routine MRI protocol of cancer patients should be altered to accommodate the evolving MRI technology and cost effectively substitute the need for a gadolinium enhanced scan.     

Power Doppler sonography: Anything to add to BI-RADS US in solid breast masses?

Objective

To evaluate the contribution of power Doppler ultrasonography (PDUS) to breast imaging reporting and data system ultrasonography (BI-RADS US) categorization of solid breast masses.

Materials and methods

Totally 94 solid lesions with histopathological results in 49 patients were included in the study. US features of the lesions were classified according to American College of Radiologists (ACR) BI-RADS US lexicon. Lesions were evaluated qualitatively according to their PDUS properties and quantitatively with spectral analysis. Hypervascularity, penetration of vessels into the mass or branching-disordered course and resistivity index values higher than 0.85 were accepted as probable malignant criteria.

Results

Fifty-five of 94 lesions were benign (58.5%), while 39 (41.5%) were malignant histopathologically. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of US and PDUS in the diagnosis of malignant lesions were 100%, 58.2%, 62.9%, 100% and 71.8%, 81.8%, 73.7%, 80.4%, respectively. Criteria used for the distinction of malignant and benign lesions like number of vessels (p < 0.05), distribution of tumoral vessels, morphology of vessels and resistivity index values higher than 0.85 showed statistically significant difference (p < 0.001). When sonographic findings were combined with PDUS and spectral analysis findings, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were 100%, 52.7%, 60% and 100%, respectively.

Conclusion

PDUS and spectral analysis have no contribution to BI-RADS US. For the spectral analysis, when RI value is one or greater, malignancy risk significantly increases.     

Mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced MR imaging of pancreatic disease

Our study aimed to assess the diagnostic capabilities of mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced MRI for the evaluation of pancreatic disease. Sixty-three patients suspected of having pancreatic disease underwent MRI with a 1.5-T device. After the acquisition of axial and coronal T2-weighted sequences, the MR protocol included T1-weighted fat-suppressed breath-hold SPGR images obtained before and 30 min after the infusion of Mn-DPDP (Teslascan). The detection of a focal pancreatic lesion and its intensity were evaluated in consensus by two observers, who also attempted to characterize each lesion as benign or malignant. The reviewers were blinded to patient identification and all clinical, laboratory and previous imaging findings. MR imaging results were correlated with surgery (n=37), laparoscopy (n=1), biopsy (n=2) and imaging follow–up (n=22). Sixty-two subjects were effectively included in our analysis because one patient was lost to follow-up; final malignant and benign diagnoses were determined in 22 (35%) and 29 (47%) of the patients, respectively. The level of confidence in the diagnosis of the pancreatic lesion was significantly increased by the administration of Mn-DPDP as demonstrated by ROC analysis of unenhanced and post-contrast image sets (P=0.009). Overall, on the basis of observers’ readings, MR assessment of pancreatic disease resulted in 57 correct diagnoses (accuracy, 92%) and five (8%) incorrect diagnoses. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the reviewers for the detection of pancreatic lesions and for the differentiation between benign and malignant masses were 91% (95% CI: 84 and 98%), 93% (95% CI: 86 and 99%), 87% (95% CI: 79 and 95%) and 95% (95% CI: 89 and 100%), respectively. Mn-DPDP-enhanced MRI is an effective diagnostic tool for evaluating pancreatic disease.