The investigation and management of inherited thrombophilia

Inherited thrombophilia can be defined as a genetically determined tendency to venous thromboembolism. Genetic risk factors for venous thrombosis include antithrombin deficiency, protein C deficiency, protein S deficiency, activated protein C resistance due to the factor V gene Leiden mutation, inherited hyperhomocysteinaemia, elevated factor VIII levels and the prothrombin gene G20210 A variant. A genetic risk factor is now identifiable in up to 50% of unselected patients with venous thrombosis. Individuals with inherited thrombophilia may develop venous thrombosis at a young age, or they may present with thrombosis at an unusual site or in the apparent absence of any precipitating event. A family history of thrombosis is suggestive of inherited thrombophilia. Laboratory investigations for inherited thrombophilia should include testing for activated protein C resistance and the factor V gene Leiden mutation, and screening for deficiencies of antithrombin, protein C or protein S. Screening for the prothrombin gene G20210 A variant, and measurement of plasma factor VIII and homocysteine levels should be considered in individual cases. In recent years the multifactorial nature of thrombophilia, both circumstantially and on a genetic level, has become increasingly apparent. Individuals with more than one inherited thrombophilia risk factor are particularly prone to thrombosis and their identification is a priority.     

Measurement of antithrombin activity by thrombin-based and by factor Xa-based chromogenic substrate assays.

Functionally active antithrombin can be quantified by chromogenic substrate assays utilizing the heparin cofactor activity of antithrombin and the inhibition rates of thrombin or of activated factor X (FXa). Thrombin-based assays but not FXa-based assays may overestimate the antithrombin activity due to their sensitivity toward heparin cofactor II. We focused on the question whether an overestimation of antithrombin activity by thrombin-based assays involves the risk of misdiagnosing antithrombin-deficient individuals as being non-deficient. We determined antithrombin using two thrombin-based assays and one FXa-based assay in 27 plasma samples from patients with acquired antithrombin deficiency spiked with lepirudin, in antithrombin-deficient plasma and in mixtures of antithrombin-deficient plasma and normal plasma. We also measured antithrombin in healthy subjects, in patients with inherited and acquired antithrombin deficiency and in patients under high-dose heparin treatment. At therapeutic final concentrations of lepirudin, antithrombin activities were considerably overestimated by the thrombin-based assays but not by the FXa-based assay. The residual antithrombin activities in antithrombin-deficient plasma determined by the thrombin-based assays were markedly higher than the corresponding values obtained with the FXa-based assay. The thrombin-based assays also overestimated antithrombin activity in patients under high-dose heparin. However, the degree of overestimation in the range between 50 and 100 IU/dl was too low to misidentify individuals with inherited or acquired antithrombin deficiency as normal. We conclude that functionally active antithrombin can be reliably determined using FXa-based chromogenic substrate assays in all settings examined. Thrombin-based assays must not be used in patients under treatment with hirudin or other direct thrombin inhibitors.     

High factor VIII levels contribute to the thrombotic risk in families with factor V Leiden

Factor V Leiden (FVL)-carrying relatives of selected patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) have much higher venous thrombotic risks than FVL-carrying relatives of unselected consecutive patients with VTE. To find an explanation for this, we explored other risk factors of VTE, in particular the presence of high factor VIII levels, in a retrospective follow-up study. We assessed levels of factor VIII, factor IX, fibrinogen, protein C, protein S, antithrombin, the presence of prothrombin 20210A, and the occurrence of VTE in 61 first-degree relatives of 12 selected thrombophilic families harbouring FVL, and 183 first-degree relatives of 47 unselected families of FVL carriers with a first VTE. In all families, FVL appeared to be an independent risk factor for VTE. Higher thrombosis incidence rates were found in carriers of both FVL and high factor VIII levels (> or = 150 IU/dl), while high levels of factor VIII appeared to be an independent thrombotic risk factor only in selected thrombophilic families. The fraction of individuals with more than one prothrombotic coagulation disorder was 10% higher in selected families. These results and the higher thrombotic risks we found in the thrombophilic families favour the hypothesis that other unknown co-existing genetic defects contribute to thrombophilia.     

Protein S type III deficiency is no risk factor for venous and arterial thromboembolism in 168 thrombophilic families: a retrospective study.

Free protein S rather than total protein S levels are currently measured to detect inherited protein S deficiency. Because type III (free protein S) deficiency is still not established as risk factor for thrombosis, we assessed the absolute risk of venous and arterial thromboembolism in a family cohort study. Annual incidences in first-degree relatives with and without protein S deficiency type III were compared. Probands had experienced thrombosis and had either the prothrombin G20210A mutation, increased factor VIII:C levels or hyperhomocysteinemia. Relatives were tested for these thrombophilic disorders and factor V Leiden. Levels of antithrombin, protein C, total and free protein S, and factor XI:C were additionally measured. Of 500 relatives enrolled, 105 were excluded from analysis because they could not be classified, due to acquired conditions. Protein S deficiency type III was demonstrated in 60/395 remaining relatives (15%). Other thrombophilic defects were equally distributed among deficient and non-deficient relatives. Annual incidences of venous thromboembolism were 0.28 per 100 person-years [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.09-0.66] in deficient relatives versus 0.20 per 100 person-years (95% CI, 0.12-0.30) in non-deficient relatives [hazard ratio, 1.4 (95% CI, 0.4-4.0)]. For arterial thromboembolism these values were 0.16 per 100 person-years (95% CI, 0.03-0.46) versus 0.10 per 100 person-years (95% CI, 0.05-0.19) [hazard ratio, 1.5 (95% CI, 0.3-6.0)]. These results suggest that protein S deficiency type III is not associated with an increased risk of either venous or arterial thromboembolism.     

肺血栓栓塞和遗传性抗凝血酶缺陷相关性研究进展

抗凝血酶属丝氨酸蛋白酶抑制物超家族成员,是体内凝血酶等的主要抑制物.抗凝血酶基因缺陷会导致抗凝血酶血浆蛋白水平降低,而抗凝血酶缺乏是静脉血栓形成的主要危险性遗传因素之一,因此有必要通过研究肺血栓栓塞症与遗传性抗凝血酶缺陷的关系,找到新的用来作为预测血栓形成或检测高凝状态的生物学指标,并且诊断可能发生肺血栓栓塞症等易栓症的高危人群,从而实现早期预防和个体化治疗策略以及降低发病率和病死率.     

Perinatal aspects of inherited thrombophilia

The identified main causes of inherited thrombophilia are deficiencies of antithrombin, protein C and protein S, activated protein C (APC) resistance and the factor V Leiden mutation, mutant factor II, and inherited hyperhomocysteinemia. In women from symptomatic families these defects may be associated with an increased risk of venous thrombosis in pregnancy and recurrent fetal loss. Inherited thrombophilia is common and appears to be a multigene disorder. The thrombotic risk would seem to be greatest in women with antithrombin deficiency and more than one thrombophilia defect. The abnormalities that are now recognized represent only part of the genetic predisposition to thrombosis. In assessing thrombotic risk in pregnancy, acquired risk factors as well as genetic predisposition should be considered. Increasing age, obesity, immobility, and delivery by cesarean section are major risk factors. Pregnancy should be planned, and each patient should be managed on an individual basis. In pregnancy, heparin is the anticoagulant of choice, and as far as possible, treatment with warfarin should be avoided because of the risks to the fetus. When patients are on long-term treatment with warfarin, pregnancy should be avoided, and warfarin should be discontinued prior to embarking on a pregnancy or as soon as pregnancy is suspected and before 6 weeks' gestation. In women from symptomatic families with antithrombin deficiency, adjusted dose heparin throughout pregnancy is recommended and warfarin for at least 3 months post partum. In protein C and protein S deficiency, factor V Leiden, or mutant factor II, treatment can be based on personal and family history. Thromboprophylaxis in late pregnancy and post partum should be considered. Fetal loss may be increased in women with inherited thrombophilia. The risk appears greatest in women with antithrombin deficiency and women with more than one thrombophilia defect. A number of reports have claimed that prophylactic treatment with heparin during pregnancy has resulted in successful pregnancy in women with recurrent fetal death and inherited thrombophilia.     

The genetics of venous and arterial thromboembolism

There is substantial evidence to indicate that the pathologic processes of venous and arterial thromboembolism involve both genetic and environmental influences. Scientific progress over the past decade has revealed a growing number of genetic factors, such as factor V Leiden and the prothrombin gene variant, that are present in more than 1% of the population and increase the relative risk of venous thrombosis between two- and sevenfold. Furthermore, several of these factors have been demonstrated to interact adversely with environmental influences, such as oral contraceptives and smoking. Although these traits are present at relatively high prevalence in the population, the magnitude of the increased thrombotic risk associated with these factors is substantially less than that related to inherited deficiency of the natural anticoagulant protein antithrombin, and somewhat less than the elevated risk with protein C and protein S deficiencies. In contrast to the progress that has been made in understanding the genetic contributions to venous thromboembolism, much still remains to be learned about the genetic basis of arterial thrombosis. Despite the documentation of associations between several genetic polymorphisms with plasma procoagulant levels, consistent associations with arterial thrombotic disease have not been found.     

Management options for thrombophilias

Thrombophilias may be inherited or acquired, continuing or transient, and may contribute strongly or weakly to thrombosis. They may predispose to venous thromboembolism alone or also to artery occlusion. Advice on management must recognize these variations. The presence of an inherited thrombophilia should not alter the intensity of anticoagulant therapy, given that antithrombin, protein C, or protein S deficiency, factor V Leiden, and the prothrombin G20210A mutation are not unusually anticoagulant resistant. However, they can increase the optimal treatment duration after a first thromboembolic event. Optimal duration depends on the balance between thrombosis risk off treatment and bleeding risk during extended anticoagulant therapy, and needs to be separately estimated for each individual with thrombosis and thrombophilia. The higher the thrombosis risk and the lower the bleeding risk, the longer the optimal treatment duration. This balance favors continued (but perhaps not indefinite) therapy in antithrombin, protein C, and protein S deficiency, and perhaps also in patients with the factor V Leiden or prothrombin mutations if their bleeding risk is low. Thrombosis that complicates active malignancy, the antiphospholipid syndrome, or heparin-induced thrombocytopenia needs special consideration: recent clinical trials suggest that low molecular weight heparins are more effective than warfarin in thrombosis with cancer, and that a more intense warfarin effect is not needed for patients with antiphospholipid syndrome and thrombosis. Debate continues about the place of screening for presymptomatic but affected relatives of patients with thrombosis and an inherited predisposition. It is essential that any family testing be done only with the informed consent of all concerned. Given consent, there is general support for family testing in antithrombin, protein C, or protein S deficiency and where the factor V Leiden or prothrombin mutation is strongly penetrant and expressed. There is, however, a strong argument that any testing in families in which clotting factor polymorphisms are weakly expressed should be restricted to young women when they consider hormonal contraception or pregnancy, given that these acquired factors multiply the risk.     

The incidence of venous thromboembolism in asymptomatic carriers of a deficiency of antithrombin, protein C, or protein S: a prospective cohort study

Deficiencies of antithrombin, protein C, and protein S are associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism. The objective of this study was to prospectively assess the incidence of venous thromboembolism in nontreated asymptomatic subjects with such a deficiency. We conducted a prospective cohort study in asymptomatic family members of unselected patients who presented with a venous thromboembolic event and who were found to have a deficiency of antithrombin, protein C, or protein S. No anticoagulant prophylaxis was given to the study participants, except during risk periods for venous thromboembolism. All venous thromboembolic events were diagnosed by objective diagnostic tests. A total of 208 individuals with a mean age of 37 years (range, 15 to 79) were included in the study. A total of 611 patient observation years was obtained. Nine venous thromboembolic events occurred, resulting in an annual incidence of 1.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.7 to 2.8) for the 3 deficiencies combined. Five of these events occurred spontaneously, resulting in an annual incidence of spontaneous venous thromboembolism of 0.8% (95% CI, 0.3 to 1.9). For antithrombin, protein C, and protein S deficiencies separately, this figure was 1.6%, 1.0%, and 0.4%, respectively. Thirty-four subjects experienced a total of 40 risk periods during which 4 venous thromboembolic events occurred (10% per risk period). We conclude that the use of continuous anticoagulant prophylaxis seems not warranted in asymptomatic individuals with a deficiency of antithrombin, protein C, or protein S. During risk periods for venous thromboembolism, adequate anticoagulant prophylaxis is necessary.     

Factor V Leiden: the venous thrombotic risk in thrombophilic families

Factor V Leiden (FVL) leads to a sevenfold increased risk of venous thrombosis and is present in 50% of individuals from families referred because of unexplained familial thrombophilia. We assessed the association of FVL with venous thromboembolism (VTE) in 12 thrombophilic families of symptomatic probands with FVL in a retrospective follow-up study. We screened 182 first- and second-degree relatives of the 12 unrelated propositi for the FVL mutation and the occurrence of VTE. The incidence rate of VTE in carriers of FVL (0.56%/year) was about six times the incidence for the Dutch population (0.1%/year). The incidence rate in non-carriers also appeared to be higher (0.15% per year). At the age of 50 years, the probability of not being affected by VTE was reduced to 75% for carriers and to 93% for non-carriers (P = 0.009). Identification of carriers of FV Leiden may be worthwhile in young symptomatic individuals and their relatives with a strong positive family history of venous thromboembolism or a history of recurrent venous thrombosis who may be at risk (e.g. pregnancy, use of oral contraceptives). After adjustment for prothrombin G20210A (present in two families), even higher thrombotic incidence rates were found in carriers and non-carriers of FVL. This makes the presence of other unknown prothrombotic risk factors more probable in these families.     

Inflammatory Bowel Disease Promotes Venous Thrombosis Earlier in Life

Background: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may be at increased risk of having venous thromboembolism. Methods: Medical records from 1253 IBD patients attending hospital care during the years 1987-97 were studied. These patients were recruited from a population of 340,000 inhabitants. Patients with verified venous thrombosis were characterized clinically, and blood samples were examined for coagulopathy including analyses of antithrombin, plasminogen, protein C, protein S, factor V, and prothrombin mutations. As control groups we used 99 patients with verified venous thrombosis and no history of IBD and 288 volunteers with no history of thrombosis. Results: The incidence of venous thrombosis was 1.5/1000 IBD patients per year, which is comparable to the background population. The mean age was significantly lower in IBD patients than in non-IBD patients (53 versus 64 years, P = 0.0225). We found one patient with antithrombin deficiency but none with protein C, protein S, or plasminogen deficiency. Factor V mutation was as prevalent in IBD patients with thrombosis as in thrombotic non-IBD patients (27% versus 28%) and 3.0 times (95% confidence interval, 0.8-11.9) more frequent in IBD patients with thrombosis than in healthy controls. Prothrombin mutation was not detected in IBD patients with venous thrombosis. Conclusion: We found no increased incidence of venous thrombosis in IBD patients compared with a background population. However, IBD patients had venous thrombosis earlier in life than non-IBD patients. Although factor V mutation may contribute to thrombosis, IBD acts as a trigger through mechanisms that still remain unexplained.     

A prospective study of asymptomatic carriers of the factor V Leiden mutation to determine the incidence of venous thromboembolism

BACKGROUND: The factor V Leiden mutation is a common genetic defect associated with an increased risk for venous thromboembolism. The clinical implications for asymptomatic carriers of this mutation and, consequently, the usefulness of screening families in which a proband has both the mutation and venous thromboembolism are unclear. OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of venous thromboembolism in asymptomatic carriers of the factor V Leiden mutation. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: University hospitals in the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: 470 asymptomatic carriers of the factor V Leiden mutation (234 men, 236 women; mean age, 43 years [range, 15 to 88 years]), 12 of whom were homozygous. Carriers were identified by screening the first-degree relatives (>15 years of age) of 247 symptomatic probands. MEASUREMENTS: Objectively diagnosed episodes of venous thromboembolism and the relationship between incidence and exposure to high-risk situations. RESULTS: Nine venous thromboembolic events were observed in 1564 observation-years, resulting in an annual incidence of 0.58% (95% CI, 0.26% to 1.10%). The incidence of spontaneous venous thromboembolism was 0.26% (CI, 0.07% to 0.65%) per year; 3.5% (CI, 0.1% to 17.8%) per episode of surgery, trauma, or immobilization; 0.0% (CI, 0.0% to 19.5%) per pregnancy; 1.8% (CI, 0.4% to 5.2%) per year of oral contraceptive use; and 2.9% (CI, 0.8% to 15.3%) per year of use of hormone replacement therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The absolute annual incidence of spontaneous venous thromboembolism in asymptomatic carriers of the factor V Leiden mutation is low and does not justify routine screening of the families of symptomatic patients.     

Thrombophilia and pregnancy

The risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) increases up to 5-10-fold during pregnancy and VTE represents the first cause of maternal mortality. The annual incidence of VTE is 0.97 per 1000 women during pregnancy and 7.19 per 1000 in the puerperium. The risk is higher in carriers of inherited thrombophilia. Prophylaxis of VTE during pregnancy in thrombophilic women, is still controversial, whereas there is agreement on the used of LMWH or oral anticoagulants during puerperium. LMWH is suggested during pregnancy in antithrombin deficient women, compound heterozygotes for prothrombin G20210A and factor V Leiden, and homozygotes for these conditions, with no prior VTE. In heterozygotes for F V Leiden or prothrombin G20210A with no prior VTE surveillance is preferred during pregnancy and LMWH or OA during puerperium. For patients with APLAs and no prior VTE or fetal loss, one of the following approaches is suggested: prophylactic LMWH and/or low-dose aspirin, mini dose heparin, surveillance (7 degrees ACCP). Patients with APLAs and a history of thrombosis should receive therapeutic-dose LMWH or UH plus low-dose aspirin during pregnancy and long term OA postpartum. In women with prior VTE and inherited thrombophilia, prophylactic or intermediate-dose LMWH is recommended during pregnancy plus post-partum OA. Intermediate-dose LMWH during pregnancy is suggested in antithrombin-deficient women, compound heterozygotes for prothrombin G20210A and factor V Leiden, and homozygotes for these conditions.     

Inflammatory bowel disease promotes venous thrombosis earlier in life

BACKGROUND: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may be at increased risk of having venous thromboembolism. METHODS: Medical records from 1,253 IBD patients attending hospital care during the years 1987-97 were studied. These patients were recruited from a population of 340,000 inhabitants. Patients with verified venous thrombosis were characterized clinically, and blood samples were examined for coagulopathy including analyses of antithrombin, plasminogen, protein C, protein S, factor V, and prothrombin mutations. As control groups we used 99 patients with verified venous thrombosis and no history of IBD and 288 volunteers with no history of thrombosis. RESULTS: The incidence of venous thrombosis was 1.5/1,000 IBD patients per year, which is comparable to the background population. The mean age was significantly lower in IBD patients than in non-IBD patients (53 versus 64 years, P= 0.0225). We found one patient with antithrombin deficiency but none with protein C, protein S, or plasminogen deficiency. Factor V mutation was as prevalent in IBD patients with thrombosis as in thrombotic non-IBD patients (27% versus 28%) and 3.0 times (95% confidence interval, 0.8-11.9) more frequent in IBD patients with thrombosis than in healthy controls. Prothrombin mutation was not detected in IBD patients with venous thrombosis. CONCLUSION: We found no increased incidence of venous thrombosis in IBD patients compared with a background population. However, IBD patients had venous thrombosis earlier in life than non-IBD patients. Although factor V mutation may contribute to thrombosis, IBD acts as a trigger through mechanisms that still remain unexplained.     

Cerebral sinus-venous thrombosis

Cerebral sinus-venous thrombosis (CSVT) is a rare life-threatening disease with an estimated annual incidence of 3–4 cases per million in adults and 7 cases per million in neonates. Brain tumors, cerebral infections and traumas are local risk factors for CSVT, but the commonest encountered risk factors are oral contraceptive use, pregnancy and puerperium that make the disease predominant in female sex. In 15–20 % of patients, the disease remains unprovoked, i.e., occurring in the absence of predisposing factors. Thrombophilic abnormalities either inherited [deficiency of the natural anticoagulant proteins antithrombin, protein C or protein S, mutations in the factor V gene (factor V Leiden) or prothrombin gene (prothrombin G20210A)] or acquired (antiphospholipid antibodies) are worthy to be investigated in patients with CSVT, as well as hyperhomocysteinemia. In a small proportion of patients, CSVT is the first manifestation of a myeloproliferative neoplasm. The proportion of patients with recurrent CSVT is low, but venous thromboembolism (deep vein thrombosis in the lower limbs or pulmonary embolism) can develop particularly in patients with a first idiopathic CSVT. In the past decade, there has been increasing evidence that early diagnosis and anticoagulant treatment reduce morbidity of CSVT and improve survival. However, the optimal duration of anticoagulant treatment is not well established, because limited information is available on the rate of CSVT recurrence after anticoagulant discontinuation.     

Thrombophilia as a multigenic disease

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Venous thrombosis is a common disease annually affecting 1 in 1000 individuals. The multifactorial nature of the disease is illustrated by the frequent identification of one or more predisposing genetic and/or environmental risk factors in thrombosis patients. Most of the genetic defects known today affect the function of the natural anticoagulant pathways and in particular the protein C system. This presentation focuses on the importance of the genetic factors in the pathogenesis of inherited thrombophilia with particular emphasis on those defects which affect the protein C system. INFORMATION SOURCES: Published results in articles covered by the Medline database have been integrated with our original studies in the field of thrombophilia. STATE OF THE ART AND PERSPECTIVES: The risk of venous thrombosis is increased when the hemostatic balance between pro- and anti-coagulant forces is shifted in favor of coagulation. When this is caused by an inherited defect, the resulting hypercoagulable state is a lifelong risk factor for thrombosis. Resistance to activated protein C (APC resistance) is the most common inherited hypercoagulable state found to be associated with venous thrombosis. It is caused by a single point mutation in the factor V (FV) gene, which predicts the substitution of Arg506 with a Gln. Arg506 is one of three APC-cleavage sites and the mutation results in the loss of this APC-cleavage site. The mutation is only found in Caucasians but the prevalence of the mutant FV allele (FV:Q506) varies between countries. It is found to be highly prevalent (up to 15%) in Scandinavian populations, in areas with high incidence of thrombosis. FV:Q506 is associated with a 5-10-fold increased risk of thrombosis and is found in 20-60% of Caucasian patients with thrombosis. The second most common inherited risk factor for thrombosis is a point mutation (G20210A) in the 3' untranslated region of the prothrombin gene. This mutation is present in approximately 2% of healthy individuals and in 6-7% of thrombosis patients, suggesting it to be a mild risk factor of thrombosis. Other less common genetic risk factors for thrombosis are the deficiencies of natural anticoagulant proteins such as antithrombin, protein C or protein S. Such defects are present in less than 1% of healthy individuals and together they account for 5-10% of genetic defects found in patients with venous thrombosis. Owing to the high prevalence of inherited APC resistance (FV:Q506) and of the G20210A mutation in the prothrombin gene, combinations of genetic defects are relatively common in the general population. As each genetic defect is an independent risk factor for thrombosis, individuals with multiple defects have a highly increased risk of thrombosis. As a consequence, multiple defects are often found in patients with thrombosis.     

Thromboembolism in children

Acquired and inherited prothrombotic risk factors increase the risk of thrombosis in children. This review is based on "milestone" pediatric reports and new literature data (January 2001-February 2002) on the presence of acquired and inherited prothrombotic risk factors, imaging methods, and treatment modalities in pediatric thromboembolism. After confirming clinically suspected thromboembolism with suitable imaging methods, pediatric patients should be screened for common gene mutations (factor V G1691A, prothrombin G20210A and MTHFR C677T genotypes), rare genetic deficiencies (protein C, protein S, antithrombin, and plasminogen), and new candidates for genetic thrombophilia causing elevated levels of lipoprotein(a), and homocysteine, and probable genetic risk factors (elevations in fibrinogen, factor IX, and factor VIIIC, and decreases in factor XII). Data interpretation is based on age-dependent reference ranges or the identification of causative gene mutations/polymorphisms with respect to individual ethnic backgrounds. Pediatric treatment protocols for acute thromboembolism, including thrombolytic and anticoagulant therapy, are mainly adapted from adult patient protocols.     

Oral contraceptives and the absolute risk of venous thromboembolism in women with single or multiple thrombophilic defects: results from a retrospective family cohort study

BACKGROUND: The risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in women taking combined oral contraceptives (COCs) is attributed to changes in coagulation and fibrinolysis. Their impact may be greater in women with preexistent thrombophilic defects. METHODS: We assessed the effects of COCs on absolute VTE risk in women with single or multiple thrombophilic defects in a retrospective family cohort study. Female relatives of probands with VTE and hereditary deficiencies of protein S, protein C, or antithrombin were tested for known thrombophilic defects, including the index deficiency. Absolute incidences of VTE were compared in deficient vs nondeficient women, in deficient and nondeficient women who ever or never used COCs, and in deficient and nondeficient women with 0, 1, or more than 1 other thrombophilic defect during exposure to COCs. RESULTS: Of 222 women, 135 (61%) ever used COCs. Overall, annual incidences of VTE were 1.64% and 0.18% in deficient and nondeficient women, respectively; the adjusted relative risk was 11.9 (95% confidence interval, 3.9-36.2). The risk was comparable in deficient ever and never users (1.73% vs 1.54%). Annual incidences during actual COC use were 4.62% in deficient women and 0.48% in nondeficient women; the relative risk was 9.7 (95% confidence interval, 3.0-42.4). The incidence increased by concomitant thrombophilic defects, from 3.49% to 12.00% in deficient women and from 0% to 3.13% in nondeficient women. CONCLUSIONS: Women with hereditary deficiencies of protein S, protein C, or antithrombin are at high risk of VTE during use of COCs, particularly when other thrombophilic defects are present. They have VTE at a younger age, but the overall risk is not increased by COCs.     

Coinheritance of the HR2 haplotype in the factor V gene confers an increased risk of venous thromboembolism to carriers of factor V R506Q (factor V Leiden).

With the aim of establishing whether the HR2 haplotype in factor V affects the risk of venous thromboembolism, a retrospective multicenter cohort study was performed in 810 family members identified through 174 probands who suffered from at least 1 episode of deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism and had an inherited defect associated with thrombophilia (antithrombin, protein C, or protein S deficiency; factor V R506Q or prothrombin G20210A). Fifty-eight percent (468/810) of the family members had an inherited defect and 10% (47/468) were symptomatic. The HR2 haplotype was found in association with factor V R506Q more frequently in family members with venous thromboembolism (18%) than in those without (8%). Double heterozygosity for factor V R506Q and HR2 conferred a 3- to 4-fold increase in the relative risk of venous thromboembolism compared with factor V R506Q alone. The median age at first event was lower when the 2 defects were associated (46 v 52 years). No increase in risk of venous thromboembolism could be demonstrated when the HR2 haplotype was associated with inherited thrombophilic defects other than factor V R506Q. Because both factor V R506Q and the HR2 haplotype are very frequent, the effect of their coinheritance on the risk of venous thromboembolism might represent a clinically relevant issue, and screening for HR2 in carriers of factor V R506Q should be considered.     

Risk of venous thromboembolism in carriers of factor V Leiden with a concomitant inherited thrombophilic defect: a retrospective analysis.

Factor V Leiden is the most common genetic defect associated with venous thromboembolism. Its clinical expression is limited and shows a wide intrafamilial and interfamilial variation, which might be explained by the influence of other genetic risk factors. We retrospectively studied 226 patients with factor V Leiden and documented venous thromboembolism (probands) and 400 first-degree carrier relatives to assess the contribution of concomitant genetic risk factors to the occurrence of venous thromboembolism. The prothrombin G20210A mutation was found in 8.3%, homozygosity of factor V Leiden in 7.2%, and inherited deficiencies of antithrombin, protein C or protein S in 4.7% of symptomatic carriers (probands and relatives), as compared with 6.0, 3.4 and 0.9% of asymptomatic carriers, respectively. The total follow-up time in relatives was 11 049 years. Prevalences of venous thromboembolism were 10.8% in single heterozygous factor V Leiden carrier relatives, 16.0% in double-heterozygotes for factor V Leiden and the prothrombin mutation, 36.8% in homozygotes for factor V Leiden, and 40.0% in double-heterozygotes for factor V Leiden and an inherited deficiency of protein C or protein S. Annual incidences in these groups were 0.39, 0.57, 1.41, and 4.76%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed a small, non-significant additional effect of the prothrombin mutation on the risk of venous thromboembolism in heterozygotes for factor V Leiden [adjusted hazard ratio, 1.3; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.5-3.8]. This effect was more pronounced for homozygosity of factor V Leiden (adjusted hazard ratio, 3.9; 95% CI, 1.7-9.0) and inherited protein C or protein S deficiencies (adjusted hazard ratio, 17.5; 95% CI, 3.8-81.2). Our data provide evidence of clustering of the evaluated genetic thrombophilic defects in symptomatic factor V Leiden carriers and support the assumption that the clinical expression of factor V Leiden depends on clustering in a part of carriers.