Intrarectal ground electrode improves the reliability of motor evoked potentials recorded in the anal sphincter

Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) can be recorded in the external anal sphincter in response to magnetic stimulation of the cerebral cortex or sacral roots. However, the magnitude of the stimulus artifact may alter the reliability of anal MEP recording. An intrarectal ground electrode substantially reduces stimulus artifact and technical failure, improving MEP latency determination to sacral root stimulation in particular.     

ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL EVALUATION OF GENITO-SPHINCTERIC DYSFUNCTION IN MULTIPLE SYSTEM ATROPHY

Thirteen patients with multiple system atrophy underwent multimodality neurophysiological evaluation, including sphincteric needle electromyography (EMG), sacral reflexes, pudendal nerve terminal latency, pudendal (PSEPs) and tibialis posterior nerve somatosensory evoked potentials (TPSEPs), and perineal motor evoked potentials (PMEPs). EMG revealed denervation or neurogenic changes, with reduction in spontaneous tonic activity at rest and abnormal pudendal nerve terminal latency in 10 patients (76.9%); anal reflex was delayed in 7 patients (53.8%). TPSEPs scalp responses were clearly abnormal in 4 patients (30.7%), whereas PSEPs exhibited changes in 9 (69.2%): in 6 patients responses were delayed at lumbar level (46.2%), and in 5 over the scalp (38.4%). PMEPs showed an increase in latency with a mild prolongation of central motor conduction time (CMCT) in 2 cases (15.3%); 1 patient had prolonged latencies following both cortical and sacral stimulation, but a normal CMCT. Even if diagnostic yield is not improved using these investigations they provide evidence of multiple lesion sites other than Onuf's nucleus.­­     

Neurophysiological evaluation of central-peripheral sensory and motor pudendal fibres

Extensive neurophysiological investigations were carried out in 18 healthy volunteer subjects, and 6 patients with neurological disease. The tests consisted of spinal and scalp somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) to stimulation of the dorsal nerve of penis/clitoris, motor evoked potentials (MEPs) from the bulbocavernosus muscle (BC) and anal sphincter (AS) in response to scalp and sacral root stimulation, and measurement of sacral reflex latency (SRL) from BC and AS. In the control subjects, the mean sensory total conduction time (sensory TCT), as measured at the peak of the scalp P40 wave was 40.9 msec (range: 37.8-44.2). The mean sensory central conduction time (sensory CCT = spine-to-scalp conduction time) was 27.0 msec (range: 23.5-30.4). Transcranial brain stimulation was performed by using a magnetic stimulator both at rest and during voluntary contraction of the examined muscle. Sacral root stimulation was performed at rest. Motor total conduction times (motor TCT) to BC and AS muscles were respectively 28.8 and 30.0 msec at rest, and 22.5 and 22.8 msec during contraction. Motor central conduction times (motor CCT) to sacral cord segments controlling BC and AS muscles were respectively 22.4 and 21.2 msec at rest, and 15.1 and 12.4 msec during contraction. The mean latencies of SRL were respectively 31.4 msec in the bulbocavernosus muscle and 35.9 msec in the anal sphincter. Combined or isolated abnormalities of SEPs, MEPs and SRL were found in a small group of patients with neurological disorders primarily or secondarily affecting the genito-urinary tract.     

Motor evoked potentials following cervical electrical stimulation in brachial plexus lesions

The diagnostic relevance of recording motor evoked potentials (MEPs) after electrical stimulation of the cervical region, as compared with conventional needle electromyography (EMG), was evaluated in 26 patients with brachial plexus (BP) damage of different aetiology, severity and topography. MEP abnormalities (absence or latency increase) were observed in at least one muscle of all the patients, with a global incidence of 61.5% of the muscles examined. Neurogenic EMG signs were present in all but one patient with an incidence of 62.2% of the muscles examined. Combining the two methods, the global incidence of abnormalities rose to 69.9%. MEP abnormalities were consistent with the clinical topography and severity of BP lesions and were fairly parallel with EMG findings. Recording MEPs after percutaneous electrical stimulation of the cervical region may be regarded as a rapid, non-invasive method for quantitative electrophysiological assessment of BP damage.     

Electrophysiological evaluation of genito-sphincteric dysfunction in multiple system atrophy

Thirteen patients with multiple system atrophy underwent multimodality neurophysiological evaluation, including sphincteric needle electromyography (EMG), sacral reflexes, pudendal nerve terminal latency, pudendal (PSEPs) and tibialis posterior nerve somatosensory evoked potentials (TPSEPs), and perineal motor evoked potentials (PMEPs). EMG revealed denervation or neurogenic changes, with reduction in spontaneous tonic activity at rest and abnormal pudendal nerve terminal latency in 10 patients (76.9%); anal reflex was delayed in 7 patients (53.8%). TPSEPs scalp responses were clearly abnormal in 4 patients (30.7%), whereas PSEPs exhibited changes in 9 (69.2%): in 6 patients responses were delayed at lumbar level (46.2%), and in 5 over the scalp (38.4%). PMEPs showed an increase in latency with a mild prolongation of central motor conduction time (CMCT) in 2 cases (15.3%); 1 patient had prolonged latencies following both cortical and sacral stimulation, but a normal CMCT. Even if diagnostic yield is not improved using these investigations they provide evidence of multiple lesion sites other than Onuf's nucleus.     

Abnormalities of somatosensory and motor evoked potentials in adrenomyeloneuropathy: Comparison with magnetic resonance imaging and clinical findings

We studied 6 patients with adrenomyeloneuropathy (AMN) showing mild signs of central nervous system involvement. All patients underwent brain and spinal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and somatosensory (SEP) and motor (MEP) evoked potential study. Whereas SEPs and MEPs were abnormal in all patients, only 1 patient showed brain MRI abnormalities; spinal MRI showed hypotrophy without focal abnormalities in 4 of 6 patients. Median nerve SEPs, which were recorded with noncephalic reference montage, revealed delayed or absent scalp P14 far-field potential in all patients and abnormal spinal N13 in 2. Moreover, tibial nerve SEPs revealed abnormalities of the subcortical P30 response in all 4 patients in whom scalp-to-ear recording was employed. These findings strongly suggest that in the early stages of disease neurological dysfunction is localized in the spinal cord, where it is difficult to assess using MRI. However, SEPs and MEPs, which show a typical pattern of abnormality in these patients, could be useful in disclosing signs of long tract involvement and in monitoring treatment. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Muscle Nerve 20: 1249–1257, 1997     

The use of transcranial magnetic stimulation for monitoring descending spinal cord motor function.

This report describes our initial clinical experience using transcranial magnetic stimulation for monitoring spinal cord motor function during surgical procedures. Motor evoked potentials were elicited using a cap shaped coil placed on the scalp of 27 patients while recording peripheral motor responses (compound muscle action potentials--CMAPs) from the upper (N = 1) or lower limbs (N = 26). Wherever possible, cortical somatosensory responses (SEPs) were also monitored by electrically stimulating the left and right posterior tibial nerve (N = 25) or the median nerve (N = 1). The judicious choice of anesthetic regimens resulted in successfully obtaining motor evoked responses (MEPs) in 21 of 27 patients and SEPs in 26 of 27 patients. Single pulse TMS resulted in peripheral muscle responses having large variability, whereas, the variability of SEPs was much less. Criteria based on response variability for assessing clinically significant changes in both MEPs and SEPs resulted in two false negative predictions for SEPs and none for MEPs when evaluating postoperative motor function. We recommend monitoring both sensory and motor pathways during procedures where placing the spinal cord at risk of damage.     

Influence of isoflurane anesthesia on motor evoked potentials elicited by transcortical,brainstem, and spinal root stimulation

Abstract

Electrical stimulation over the motor cortexl base ofthe skulll and cervical spine motor roots was performed in 9 male rats (41 0 ± 86 g) before and after induction with isoflurane at 7 MAC concentration. The mean latency and amplitude of descending spinal evoked potential (OSEP) from spinal cord and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) from forearm muscles obtained after motor cortexl brainsteml and cervical root stimulations were calculated and compared. The electrical current intensity to elicit the MEPs after corticall brainsteml and spinal roots stimulation were 23.4 ± 7.61 7.0 ± 3.71 and 7.4 ± 0.8 mAl respectively. The brainstem stimulation activated descending motor pathways with a latency midway between that produced by electrical stimulation over the motor cOrtexI and by electrical stimulation over the cervical enlargements. The latency difference between cortical (8.8 ± 3.2 msec) and brainstem (5.7 ± 7.2 msec) stimulation was 3.7 ± 2.3 msec in all forearm extensor muscles. The latency difference between cervical (3.6 ± 0.9 msec) and brainstem stimulation (5.7 ± 7.2 msec) was 2.3 ± 7.7 msec for the same musclesl suggesting the brainstem stimulation activates the descending motor neurons at the level of cervicalmedullary junction. The amplitudes were 789 ± 7471 672 ± 3541 and 765 ± 389 µV for corticall brainsteml and cervical root stimulations. The inhalation anesthesia isoflurane at 7MAC (7.2%) completely abolished the cortical and brainstem MEPs within minutesl while the MEPs elicited by direct stimulation of the cervical spinal roots remained unchanged. Our results indicate synaptic-dependent MEPs elicited at motor cortex or brainstem levels are highly sensitive to isoflurane anesthesia. [Neural Res 1998; 20: 555-558]     

Facilitation of magnetic motor evoked potentials during the mixed nerve silent period

We studied motor nueron excitability during the mixed nerve silent period (MNSP) in a hand muscle using magnetic motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and F-waves. MEPs elicited between the V₁ and V₂ potentials of the MNSP were much larger than control MEPs elicited at rest, and were even comparable in size to control MEPs occured without shortening of MEP latency, suggesting a supraspinal mechanism. MEPs were facilitated during the MNSP when elicited with a figure-8-shaped coil in a posterior–anterior orientation, but not when MEPs of the same size were elicited with the coil held in a lateral–medial orientation. F-waves elicited during the MNSP were variable between subjects, and not consistently different from control F-waves elicited at rest. Our findings may reflect increased cortical motor excitability during the MNSP, possibly related to activation of muscle afferents by mixed nerve stimulation. © John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Magnetically evoked motor potentials in demyelinating and axonal polyneuropathy: a comparative study

We investigated the value of magnetically evoked motor potentials (MEPs) for the differentiation of demyelinating and axonal polyneuropathies. The study population comprised 107 patients, with polyneuropathy verified by electromyography (EMG) and nerve conduction study (NCS), who had also been examined by means of MEP. MEPs were evoked by magnetic stimulation of the cortex and the spinal roots and were recorded from three upper limb muscles and two lower limb muscles bilaterally. From the EMG/NCS results 53 patients were characterized as having primary demyelination (demyelinating patients) and 54 as having axonal involvement (axonal patients). Demyelinating patients were classified as acute (acute inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: AIDP) or chronic (chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: CIDP) according to the duration of illness. A series of indices were calculated from MEP results. One demyelinating patient and two axonal patients had normal MEPs. The MEPs of the demyelinating patients showed significantly longer peripheral conduction times, larger interside differences and lower amplitudes than the axonal patients. The central conduction index and the amplitudes upon cortical stimulation were significantly higher in patients with CIDP than in those with AIDP. Peripheral conduction time prolonged by more than 85% in at least one of the 10 muscles studied or a peripheral conduction index of above 9.4 were pathognomonic for demyelination. By combining all criteria 75% of the patients could be categorized as CIDP vs. AIDP in accordance with the EMG/NCS diagnosis. Likewise, 83% were categorized correctly as demyelinating versus axonal according to the EMG/NCS data.     

Long latency responses in pure sensory stroke due to thalamic infarction

Objectives – Our study was designed to clarify the role of the thalamus in the generation of the electrically elicited long-latency reflexes (LLR) in voluntarily activated hand muscles. Materials and methods – EMG responses of the thenar muscles were evoked by electrical stimulation of the median nerve at the wrist at motor threshold intensity in 10 patients with acute pure sensory stroke due to thalamic infarction. Concomitant recording of somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) was performed. The subjects were asked to steadily abduct the thumb at 20–30% of maximal force against a force transducer. Rectified and averaged EMG activities were recorded. Results – The LLR II was missing completely or significantly attenuated in the majority of the patients (9 of 10), of whom 3 also had delayed latency. Abnormal SEPs were documented in 7 patients (7 of 10). In the follow-up, 5 patients had partial reversal of LLR II. LLR II was still pathological in 1 fully recovered patient. Conclusion – Our results further confirm the transcortical generation of LLR II and imply that a thalamic relay is present in the afferent limb of the LLR.     

A bi‐directional assessment of the human brain‐anorectal axis

Background Brain‐gut dysfunction has been implicated in gastrointestinal disorders but a comprehensive test of brain‐gut axis is lacking. We developed and tested a novel method for assessing both afferent anorectal‐brain function using cortical evoked potentials (CEP), and efferent brain‐anorectal function using motor evoked potentials (MEP). Methods Cortical evoked potentials was assessed following electrical stimulations of anus and rectum with bipolar electrodes in 26 healthy subjects. Anorectal MEPs were recorded following transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over paramedian motor cortices bilaterally. Anal and rectal latencies/amplitudes for CEP and MEP responses and thresholds for first sensation and pain (mA) were analyzed and compared. Reproducibility and interobserver agreement of responses were examined. Key Results Reproducible polyphasic rectal and anal CEPs were recorded in all subjects, without gender differences, and with negative correlation between BMI and CEP amplitude (r ?0.66, P = 0.001). Transcranial magnetic stimulation evoked triphasic rectal and anal MEPs, without gender differences. Reproducibility for CEP and MEP was excellent (CV <10%). The inter‐rater CV for anal and rectal MEPs was excellent (ICC 97–99), although there was inter‐subject variation. Conclusions & Inferences Combined CEP and MEP studies offer a simple, inexpensive and valid method of examining bidirectional brain‐anorectal axes. This comprehensive method could provide mechanistic insights into lower gut disorders.     

Serial changes in motor and somatosensory evoked potentials in putaminal haemorrhage

Little is known about evoked potential changes in putaminal haemorrhage. In this study, somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) have been serially evaluated and their role in the prognosis of putaminal haemorrhage is now reported. Nineteen patients with CT- or MRI-proven putaminal haemorrhage were examined after a mean duration of 13 days (range 2–30); there were 4 females and 9 males, ranging in age between 25 and 70 years. The haematomas were of medium size in 13 and large or small in 3 patients each. The changes in the clinical picture and the SEPs and MEPs were evaluated on admission, and after 30 and 90 days. Central motor conduction time (CMCT) could not be recorded in 13, but was prolonged in 2 and normal in 4 patients. Median SEPs revealed the absence of near field potentials in 11 and prolongation of N9–N20 conduction time in 1 patient. In the follow-up period MEP and SEP abnormalities only changed in 5 patients; MEPs changed in 4 and SEPs in 2. The period of normalisation of MEPs ranged between 1 and 6 months. CMCT correlated with motor and N9–N20 conduction time with sensory impairment. Eight patients had poor, 6 partial and 5 complete recovery. Power, sensation, CMCT, and size and location of haematoma made positive contributions to recovery.     

Somatosensory evoked potentials in the evaluation of patients with stocking/glove paresthesias

We studied 10 patients referred for suspicion of peripheral neuropathy. They all complained of paresthesias with a stocking distribution. As EMG, motor and sensory nerve conduction studies failed to confirm the clinical diagnosis, we studied somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) following median and tibial nerve stimulation. The SEP findings were compared with controls and 10 spastic paraplegias. The evoked potential study revealed prolonged latencies of cortical potentials after tibial nerve stimulation in all the patients with paresthesias and were considered evidence of myelopathy.     

Afferent and efferent excitabilities of the transcortical loop in patients with dentatorubral-pallidoluysian atrophy

To evaluate the excitabilities of the transcortical loop in patients with dentatorubral-pallidoluysian atrophy (DRPLA), we studied somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) and evoked EMG responses (V1 and V2) in 10 patients and age-matched controls. In addition, the facilitatory effects of somatosensory inputs on motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were studied in four patients and controls. We observed attenuated or prolonged cervical and subcortical potentials and prolonged middle latency components of SEPs. The amplitudes of V2 in patients were significantly lowered compared to those in the controls, while the amplitudes and latencies of V1 were similar between the two groups. Since V2 was considered as a transcortical reflex, our results suggest reduced excitabilities of the afferent pathway of the transcortical loop in patients with DRPLA. Median nerve stimulation (MNS) 25 to 30 ms preceding transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) facilitated MEPs in the thenar muscle in two of the four patients and in the controls. The facilitation of MEPs by MNS tended to be independent of the reduction in V2. Such a result suggests that different neural mechanisms elicit V2 and facilitate MEPs following peripheral nerve stimulation, although further studies are needed. The combination of SEPs, evoked EMG responses and MEPs may be a useful technique to detect abnormalities of input and output coordinations of the transcortical loop.     

Cutaneous silent periods in intramedullary spinal cord lesions

OBJECTIVE: The neurophysiological assessment of intramedullary spinal cord lesions has been unsatisfactory. Previous studies in patients with syringomyelia suggest that testing of cutaneous silent periods (CSPs) may be useful to assess centromedullary lesions. METHODS: The authors studied nine patients with intramedullary spinal cord lesions of different etiologies. Eight patients with cervical lesions presented with hypalgesia, hypothermesthesia, or pain in at least one upper extremity; five of them had also upper limb weakness or sensory impairment. One patient with a thoracic lesion had normal upper limb function. The authors recorded CSPs in abductor pollicis brevis muscle following digit II and digit V stimulation. Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) were obtained following median and tibial nerve stimulation. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were obtained in biceps brachii, abductor digiti minimi and tibialis anterior muscles following transcranial magnetic or electrical stimulation. RESULTS: CSP abnormalities were found in all patients with cervical lesions, but not in the patient with a thoracic lesion. Cortical median nerve SEPs had normal latencies in all patients, while tibial nerve SEPs, upper limb MEPs, and lower limb MEPs were delayed in five patients each. In one patient, abnormal CSP were the only neurophysiological finding. CSP abnormalities were associated with hypalgesia and hypothermesthesia in 95% of the studies. CONCLUSION: Upper extremity CSP testing is a sensitive neurophysiological technique for the assessment of cervical intramedullary lesions. In particular, abnormal CSPs are highly associated with spinothalamic dysfunction.     

Motor responses evoked by magnetic brain stimulation in Huntington's disease.

In 34 patients with manifest Huntington's disease (HD), and in 21 first-degree offspring without clinical signs or symptoms, the sizes, central motor latencies (CMLs) and variation in latencies of EMG responses (MEPs) following transcranial magnetic brain stimulation were studied in muscles of the upper and lower extremities. In subgroups of patients and their offspring median and tibial nerve somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) and electrically elicited long-loop reflexes (LLRs) in hand muscles were also investigated. Increased MEP thresholds were observed in 10% of the HD offspring, while CML, latency variability and MEP amplitudes always lay within normal range. In contrast, SEPs were abnormal in 33%. In HD patients MEPs were found to be abnormal in up to 72% of patients when all available response parameters were taken into consideration. MEP abnormalities correlated with the duration of motor symptoms and the severity of choreic motor activity. When both MEPs and SEPs were evaluated, abnormalities could be detected in 91% of all HD patients. We suggest that abnormal MEPs might reflect an altered excitability of the cortico-spinal system as a consequence of basal ganglia dysfunction, rather than a structural damage of the investigated descending pathways. To localize the pathological mechanism responsible for altered LLRs, a "loop analysis" was performed by recording LLRs, MEPs and SEPs in the same patients. Alterations of LLRs correlated best with abnormal SEPs and might therefore be explained by reduced somatosensory input to the motor cortex.     

Transcranial magnetic stimulation in partial epilepsy: drug-induced changes of motor excitability

Single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (s-TMS) with recording of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) from thenar muscles of both hands was performed on 84 patients with cryptogenic partial epilepsy and 50 healthy controls. We analyzed the cortical latency (CL), central conduction time (CCT), and threshold intensity (TI) required to elicit liminal MEPs at rest. In the patients, CL and CCT were normal, but TI was significantly higher than in the controls. Of the 84 patients, 65 were taking one or more antiepileptic drugs and 19 were untreated. The untreated patients had a significantly lower TI than the treated patients. In the treated patients, the TI increase paralleled the number of drugs taken. Additionally, in 2 subgroups of patients undergoing major modifications of antiepileptic treatment, TI dropped after partial withdrawl of medication and increased following the commencement of therapy. The results suggest that anticonvulsants depress the excitability of human motor pathways in epileptic subjects.     

Comparison of magnetoencephalography,functional MRI,and motor evoked potentials in the localization of the sensory-motor cortex

Abstract

To clarify the topographical relationship between peri-Rolandic lesions and the central sulcus, we carried out presurgical functional mapping by using magnetoencephalography (MEG), functional magnetic resonance imaging (f-MRI), and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) on 5 patients. The sensory cortex was identified by somatosensory evoked magnetic fields using MEG (magnetic source imaging (MSI)). The motor area of the hand region was identified using f-MRI, during a hand squeezing task. In addition, transcranial magnetic stimulation localized the hand motor area on the scalp, which was mapped onto the MRI. In all cases, the sensory cortical vein or the lack of any functional activation in the area of peri-lesional edema. MEPs were also unable to localize the entire motor strip. Therefore, at present, MSI is considered to be the most reliable method to localize peri-Rolandic lesions. [Neurol Res 1995; 17: 361-367] cortical vein or the lack of any functional activation in the area of peri-lesional edema. MEPs were also unable to localize the entire motor strip. Therefore, at present, MSI is considered to be the most reliable method to localize peri-Rolandic lesions. [Neurol Res 1995; 17: 361-367]     

Neurophysiology of the neurogenic lower urinary tract disorders.

The nervous system structures involved in the control of the lower urinary tract (LUT) are usually divided using a neuroanatomical classification system into suprapontine, pontine, spinal and sacral. In all patients with LUT symptoms, after exclusion of local causes, a nervous system disorder needs to be considered. For the diagnosis of neurogenic LUT disorders, in addition to clinical assessment, neurophysiologic testing might be useful. Imaging and other laboratory studies (e.g., cystometry) often provide relevant additional information. Neurophysiologic tests are more useful in patients with sacral compared with suprasacral disorders. Although in patients with LUT disorders external urethral sphincter (EUS) electromyography (EMG) would seem the most appropriate, anal sphincter EMG is the single most useful diagnostic test, particularly for focal sacral lesions, and atypical parkinsonism. Another clinically useful method that tests the sacral segments, and complements EMG, is the sacral (penilo/clitoro-cavernosus) reflex. Kinesiologic EMG is useful to demonstrate detrusor sphincter dyssynergia (i.e., increased EUS activity during bladder contraction), which is particularly common in spinal cord disease. Somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) and motor evoked potential (MEP) studies (cortical and lumbar) may be useful to diagnose clinically silent central lesions. MEP, in addition, seems to be very promising in research into cortical excitability. Theoretically, cortical SEP on bladder/urethra stimulation would be much more useful than pudendal SEP because it tests thin nerve afferents from the pelvic viscera. However, the utility of this technique is limited by technical difficulties, which can be partially overcome by the concomitant recording of a palmar sympathetic skin response (SSR). SSR recorded from the saddle region is also useful for testing the lumbosacral sympathetic system. Although the technique of detrusor EMG has been recently described in humans, a clinically useful test for evaluating the sacral parasympathetic system, which is crucial for LUT functioning, is still lacking.