Detection of Viability of Dysfunctional Myocardium in Coronary Heart Disease. II. Echocardiography

The detection of viable myocardium in patients with severe left ventricular (LV) dysfunction is important because these patients benefit most from revascularization. Three echocardiographic techniques can be used for the noninvasive assessment of functional correlates of viable myocardium. Two-dimensional echocardiography (2DE) is well suited for quantifying resting LV regional and global systolic function and dysfunction before and after revascularization, in addition to providing data on chamber size, shape, and wall thicknesses. The presence of hypokinesis on a resting 2DE indicates that viable myocardium is definitely present, but presence of dykinesis does not exclude viability. Dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) before revascularization unmasks viability by demonstrating augmentation of systolic function. Several clinical studies have shown that improvement of regional function during DSE indicates contractile reserve and predicts improvement of function after revascularization. A biphasic response on DSE appears to predict residual coronary artery stenosis and is a reliable marker of viability. DSE also appears to be useful after revascularization for unmasking contractile reserve. Myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) detects viability by defining microvascular perfusion, the extent of myocardium at risk, and coronary flow reserve. The clinical utility of MCE is undergoing evaluation. The combination of DSE and MCE might provide an improved estimate of the extent of viable myocardium based on assessment of function and perfusion. Meanwhile, echocardiographic and nuclear techniques can be used to complement each other in the assessment of myocardial viability.     

Myocardial contrast echocardiography in assessing microcirculation in baboons with chagas disease

OBJECTIVE: Microvascular abnormalities have been postulated in the pathogenesis of chagasic cardiomyopathy. The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between coronary microcirculation and systolic function impairment in baboons with Chagas disease using myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE). METHODS: Seventeen seropositive (5 males, 12 females; mean age 20 years) and 13 age- and gender-matched seronegative baboons underwent MCE using intravenous octafluoropropane human albumin microspheres. Color-coding was used to enhance tissue contrast in assessing regional myocardium uniformity and texture. Dipyridamole (0.54 mg/kg) was given to a subset of 4 animals to challenge coronary flow reserve. Systolic indices included left ventricular fractional shortening, velocity of circumferential fiber shortening, and left and right ventricular ejection fractions. RESULTS: Four of the 17 (24%) seropositive primates had decreased fractional shortening (25 +/- 8% vs. 40 +/-5%, p <.005), velocity of circumferential fiber shortening (1.05 +/- 0.36 circ/s vs. 1.84 +/- 0.23 circ/s, p <.0001), and reduced right ventricular ejection fraction (44 +/- 9% vs. 54 +/- 4%, p <.05) compared to other seropositive animals. Seropositive and seronegative groups showed no significant differences on the coronary microcirculation pattern as evaluated by MCE, including the 4 baboons with systolic function impairment. Moreover, coronary flow vasoreactivity resulted in a significant increase in myocardial flow as detected by color-coding masking. CONCLUSIONS: Chagasic heart disease is present in 24% of seropositive baboons spontaneously infected with Trypanosoma cruzi. MCE reveals a discrepancy between coronary microcirculation at rest and alterations in myocardial contractility, suggesting preservation of the microvascular integrity in this unique animal model.     

Detection and quantification of coronary stenosis severity with myocardial contrast echocardiography

The development of microbubble contrast agents and new imaging modalities now allows the assessment of myocardial perfusion during echocardiography. These microbubbles are excellent tracers of red blood cell kinetics. Apart from providing a spatial assessment of myocardial perfusion, myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) can also be used to quantify the 2 specific components of myocardial blood flow-flow velocity and myocardial blood volume. The method to quantify myocardial blood flow velocity is based on rapid destruction of microbubbles by ultrasound, and subsequent assessment of the rate of replenishment of microbubbles into the myocardial microcirculation within the ultrasound beam elevation. Assessment of steady state myocardial video intensity (VI) provides a measure of myocardial or capillary blood volume. Perfusion defects that develop distal to a stenosis during hyperemia are therefore due to capillary derecruitment. We have shown that the degree of derecruitment (and therefore the severity of a perfusion defect) is proportional to stenosis severity. Because the capillary bed also provides the greatest resistance to hyperemic flow, decreases in capillary blood volume distal to a stenosis during hyperemia result in increases in microvascular resistance, which is the mechanism underlying the progressive decrease in flow reserve in the presence of a stenosis. Consequently, both the severity of a perfusion defect and quantification of abnormal myocardial blood flow reserve on MCE can be used to determine stenosis severity. As imaging methods with MCE continue to be refined, the optimal imaging algorithms for clinical practice still need to be determined. MCE, however, holds promise as a noninvasive, instantaneous, on-line method for the detection and quantification of coronary artery disease.     

Assessment of Myocardial Viability in Patients With Postischemic Left Ventricular Dysfunction: Role of Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography

The distinction between viable and nonviable dysfunctional left ventricular (LV) segments after acute myocardial infarction is very important, because revascularization increases survival only in patients with viable myocardial tissue. Recent studies have highlighted a mismatch between two highly specific investigations for viability assessment: dobutamine echocardiography, which measures inotropic reserve, and myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE), which measures microvascular perfusion. Viability and functional reserve are not synonymous. Maintenance of microvascular perfusion, independently of functional reserve, attenuates left ventricular remodelling, reduces the risk of major cardiac events, and increases survival. MCE provides similar perfusion information as myocardial blush, but image quality is much higher. Quantitative analysis of digital data provides more accurate diagnostic MCE information than qualitative analysis of video signal intensity. In a recent study relating MCE findings to histologic data, MCE-derived quantitative data were closely correlated with microvascular density and capillary area, and inversely correlated with collagen content. One of the contrast agents routinely used for MCE is SonoVue, a second generation microbubble contrast agent, which is characterized by high response to ultrasound energy, ease of destruction at high energy, and strong harmonic signal at low energy. Recommendations for the assessment of postischemic LV dysfunction: routine use of MCE, followed by dobutamine echocardiography if perfusion is documented. If MCE is negative, revascularization is not indicated; if both tests are positive, revascularization is strongly recommended; if they are discordant, useful information can be obtained by assessing the extent of ²⁰¹T1 viability. (ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, Volume 20, Supplement 1, 2003)     

The alternative "ischemic" cascade in coronary microvascular disease

The conceptual model of the classical "ischemic cascade" has served cardiologists well for decades. It correctly predicts clinical findings during imaging stress testing in the presence of coronary artery disease or epicardial coronary artery spasm, where perfusion and wall motion abnormalities provide a substantially higher sensitivity than ECG changes. However, empirical experience has taught us that stress-induced ischemic-like ECG changes, often accompanied by perfusion abnormalities, are the rule rather than the exception in pathophysiological conditions during which the occurrence of ischemia usually cannot be proven, characterized by angiographically normal arteries and reduced flow reserve, such as syndrome X, arterial hypertension and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. These stress-induced "echocardiographically silent" ST segment changes may be associated with impaired coronary flow reserve and systemic endothelial dysfunction. In hypertrophic cardiomyopathy stress-induced ischemic-like ST segment depression is linked to higher long-term incidence of adverse events. It is entirely likely that our monolithic view of ischemia mirrored in the classical ischemic cascade should be integrated by the awareness of the reverse or alternative "ischemic" cascade best describing microvascular disease, with ECG changes coming first, perfusion abnormalities second, and echocardiographic changes usually being absent. Not all forms of myocardial ischemia are the same, and milder, patchy degrees of myocardial ischemia--as those hypothesized, but not proven, in microvascular angina--remain silent in its mechanical functional manifestations and may well represent a physiological scotoma of stress echocardiography. "Anatomic lies" on the ECG may be overturned into "physiologic truths" when coronary flow reserve or systemic endothelial function is considered.     

Diagnostic approach for coronary microvascular dysfunction in patients with chest pain and no obstructive coronary artery disease.

A large number of studies has demonstrated that abnormalities of coronary microcirculation may be responsible for both acute and chronic cardiac ischemic syndromes. In clinical practice the microvascular origin of myocardial ischemia and angina is usually considered in patients who are found to have normal or near-normal coronary arteries at angiography. In this article, we review the diagnostic approach to patients with suspected coronary microvascular dysfunction as a cause of ischemic syndromes and also suggest a classification of chronic and acute microvascular coronary ischemic syndrome, including myocardial infarction with normal coronary arteries.     

选择性冠状静脉动脉化后心肌微血管水平再灌注质量

目的:评估选择性冠状静脉动脉化对慢性缺血心肌微血管水平的灌注质量和心肌收缩功能的影响。方法:建立杂种犬慢性心肌缺血模型,采用结扎心大静脉(GCV)近心端,游离左内乳动脉(LIMA)与 GCV行端侧吻合,建立静脉动脉化逆行灌注模型。采用心肌声学造影(MCE)观察缺血区微血管水平的声学密度并判断其再灌注质量。心脏超声测定左室射血分数(LVEF)及左室前壁收缩期增厚率(AWT),评价心肌收缩功能。结果:经冠状静脉动脉化后缺血区心肌微血管水平声学密度明显提高,LVEF及AWT均明显增加(均P<0.05)。结论:选择性冠状静脉动脉化能有效提高慢性缺血区心肌微血管水平的血流灌注,从而增强心肌收缩功能。     

Myocardial contrast echocardiography in biopsy-proven primary cardiac amyloidosis

Cardiac vasculature is affected in 88–90% of patientswith primary cardiac amyloidosis (CA). Myocardial contrast echocardiography(MCE) relies on the ultrasound detection of microbubble contrastagents that are solely confined to the intravascular space,and are therefore useful in the evaluation of flow in the microvasculature.This is the first case report describing the use of MCE duringvasodilator stress to evaluate coronary flow reserve in a patientwith biopsy-proven primary CA and angiographically normal coronaries.Qualitative MCE demonstrated delayed replenishment of microbubblesduring peak stress; quantitative analysis was consistent witha reduction in total myocardial blood flow and reserve values.Comparative imaging modalities including strain and strain rateimaging, magnetic resonance imaging, and myocardial scintigraphywere suggestive to the diagnosis of CA. In conclusion, MCE isa method for recognition of microvascular dysfunction, and mightbe considered as a useful tool to augment echocardiographicassessment in the early diagnosis of CA.     

Echocardiographic assessment of primary microvascular angina and primary coronary microvascular dysfunction

There is an increasing interest in the role of echocardiography in the evaluation of primary microvascular angina, which is attributed to primary coronary microvascular dysfunction. Valid echocardiographic techniques are expected to facilitate the diagnosis and follow-up of these patients and would be valuable for research purposes and therapy evaluation. However, adequate echocardiographic data are lacking, and the interpretation of the limited available literature is hindered by the previous addition of microvascular angina under more inclusive entities, such as cardiac syndrome X. In experienced hands, the assessment of primary coronary microvascular dysfunction in patients with suspected primary microvascular angina, using multiple echocardiographic techniques is feasible, relatively inexpensive, and safe. Exclusion of obstructive epicardial coronary artery disease is, however, a prerequisite for diagnosis. Two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography, routine stress echocardiography, and speckle-tracking echocardiography indirectly assess primary coronary microvascular dysfunction by evaluating potential impairment in myocardial function and lack diagnostic sensitivity and specificity. Conversely, certain echocardiographic techniques, including Doppler-derived coronary flow velocity reserve and myocardial contrast echocardiography, assess some coronary microvascular dysfunction parameters and have exhibited diagnostic and prognostic potentials. Doppler-derived coronary flow velocity reserve is the best studied and only guideline-approved echocardiographic technique for documenting coronary microvascular dysfunction in patients with suspected microvascular angina. Myocardial contrast echocardiography, by comparison, can detect heterogeneous and patchy myocardial involvement by coronary microvascular dysfunction, which is an advantage over the common practice of coronary flow velocity reserve assessment in a single vessel (commonly the left anterior descending artery) which only reflects regional microvascular function. However, there is no consensus regarding the diagnostic criteria, and expertise performing this technique is limited. Echocardiography remains underexplored and inadequately utilized in the setting of microvascular angina and coronary microvascular dysfunction. Appraisal of the current echocardiographic literature regarding coronary microvascular dysfunction and microvascular angina is important to stay current with the progress in its clinical recognition and create a basis for future research and technological advancements.     

Evaluation of dynamic changes in microvascular flow during ischemia-reperfusion by myocardial contrast echocardiography

Background. Dynamic changes of myocardial blood flow have been observed after reperfusion of an occluded coronary artery. MCE performed by intracoronary contrast injection can provide an estimate of microvascular flow. We hypothesized that MCE performed using intravenous infusion of a new generation contrast agent and electrocardiogram-gated harmonic imaging would be able to assess serial changes of microvascular perfusion.Objective. To study the potential of myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) to assess serial changes of microvascular flow during ischemia-reperfusion.Methods. Sixteen dogs underwent 90 or 180 min of left anterior descending coronary occlusion, followed by 180 min of reperfusion. Regional blood flow (RBF) was measured with fluorescent microspheres at baseline, during coronary occlusion, and at 5, 30, 90, and 180 min during reperfusion. At the same time points, MCE was performed with intravenous infusion of AF0150 (4 mg/min). Gated end-systolic images in short axis were acquired in harmonic mode and digitized on-line. Background-subtracted videointensity measured from MCE and RBF obtained from fluorescent microspheres were calculated for the risk area and for a control area, and were expressed as the ratio of the two areas.Results. After initial hyperemia, a progressive reduction in flow was observed during reperfusion. MCE correctly detected the time course of changes in flow during occlusion-reperfusion. Videointensity ratio significantly correlated with RBF data (r = 0.79; p < 0.0001).Conclusions. The progressive reduction in blood flow occurring within the postischemic microcirculation was accurately detected by MCE. This approach has potential application in the evaluation and management of postischemic reperfusion in humans.     

Comparison of specificity of quantitative myocardial contrast echocardiography for diagnosis of coronary artery disease in patients with versus without diabetes mellitus

Impaired coronary flow reserve is widely reported in diabetes mellitus (DM) but its effect on myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) is unclear. We sought to identify whether DM influences the accuracy of qualitative and quantitative assessment of coronary artery disease (CAD) using MCE in 83 patients who underwent coronary angiography (60 men, 27 with DM; 56 +/- 11 years;). Destruction replenishment imaging was performed at rest and after combined dipyridamole-exercise stress testing. Ischemia was identified by the development of new wall motion abnormalities, qualitative MCE (new perfusion defects apparent 1 second after flash during hyperemia), and quantitative MCE (myocardial blood flow reserve <2.0 in the anterior circulation). Qualitative and quantitative assessment of perfusion was feasible in 100% and 92% of patients, respectively. Significant left anterior descending coronary stenosis (>50% by quantitative angiography) was present in 28 patients (including 8 with DM); 55 patients had no CAD (including 19 with DM). The myocardial blood flow reserve was reduced in patients with coronary stenosis compared with those with no CAD (1.6 +/- 1.1 vs 3.8 +/- 2.5, p <0.001). Among patients with no CAD, those with DM had an impaired flow reserve compared with control patients without DM (2.4 +/- 1.0 vs 4.5 +/- 2.8, p = 0.003). In conclusion, DM significantly influenced the quantitative, but not the qualitative, assessment of MCE, with a marked reduction in specificity in patients with DM.     

Potential clinical applications of myocardial contrast echocardiography in evaluating myocardial perfusion in coronary artery disease

Myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) is a relatively new technique that uses microbubbles to produce myocardial opacification. Recent advances in echocardiography have resulted in improved detection of microbubbles within the myocardium allowing combined acquisition of function and perfusion data, thus making MCE suitable for bedside use. Regardless of the imaging modality chosen or the type of stress used, MCE detects changes developing in the coronary microcirculation, providing important information for the evaluation of severity of coronary artery disease and for the detection of viable myocardial tissue in acute or chronic coronary artery disease.     

Myocardial contrast echocardiography in the evaluation of myocardial perfusion in patients with left bundle branch block and coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: In patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB), conventional tests such as electrocardiography and myocardial scintigraphy poorly evaluate coronary artery disease. It has been reported that myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) is capable of identifying patients with a postinfarction contractile reserve and myocardial functional recovery, also allowing the early identification of late left ventricular remodeling. The purpose of this study was to evaluate, retrospectively, myocardial perfusion in selected patients with LBBB. METHODS: Thirty patients (mean age 56 +/- 8 years) with LBBB, 15 with normal coronary arteries at angiography and 15 with a previous myocardial infarction and a critical one-vessel residual stenosis at angiography, underwent MCE from June 2000 to May 2001. MCE results were compared with rest thallium-201 myocardial scintigraphy. RESULTS: Among 15 LBBB patients with normal coronary arteries, MCE demonstrated normal perfusion in 14 patients, whereas 1 subject showed an impairment of septal perfusion. In the same group, rest thallium-201 myocardial scintigraphy showed an impaired septal perfusion in 14 patients, whereas 1 subject had a normal perfusion (MCE specificity 93% vs myocardial scintigraphy specificity 7%). Among 15 LBBB patients with coronary artery disease, MCE correctly identified a contrast defect in 14/15 patients, whereas rest thallium-201 myocardial scintigraphy demonstrated a perfusion defect in 15/15 patients (MCE sensitivity 93% vs scintigraphy sensitivity 100%). The two techniques showed a good agreement as for myocardial perfusion in the anterior wall (86.6% anterobasal; 86.6% mid-anterior; 80% distal anterior), the inferior wall (86.6%), the distal segment of the posterior lateral wall (83.3%), but a low concordance was found as for the basal septum (16.6%) and middistal septum (33.3%). CONCLUSIONS: MCE allows a diagnostic benefit in the detection of microvascular damage in patients with LBBB and unknown coronary artery disease, also in the presence of discordance with rest thallium-201 myocardial scintigraphy.     

心肌声学造影对冠状动脉血运重建术心肌灌注的评价研究

目的探讨心肌声学造影（MCE）评估缺血心肌血运重建后心肌灌注的价值。方法 36例缺血性心肌病患者分别予以冠状动脉支架置入术或冠状动脉旁路移植术进行血运重建,在术前、术后早期（〈1个月）、及术后晚期（6～12）个月分别行实时MCE检查,根据造影剂的充盈程度进行评分。将其结果与相应阶段造影（CAG）和（或）冠脉增强CT成像（CTA）结果进行对照分析。结果按16段心肌节段法进行分段分析测量。36例患者576个节段中,运动异常节段247个,MCE结果与治疗前冠脉造影吻合率为89.89%。冠脉血管再通术后早期共有172个节段有改善,与冠状动脉支架置入术或冠状动脉旁路移植术靶血管供血支配区吻合率为78.00%。术后晚期,MCE与冠脉影像结果吻合率为80.56%。结论实时MCE可随访观察冠状动脉再通血运重建缺血心肌血流灌注改善的情况,可尝试用于冠心病血管重建术后的临床随访。     

Serial evaluation of perfusion defects in patients with a first acute myocardial infarction referred for primary PTCA using intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography.

AIMS: To investigate whether myocardial contrast echocardiography using Sonazoid could be used for the serial evaluation of the presence and extent of myocardial perfusion defects in patients with a first acute myocardial infarction treated with primary PTCA, and specifically, (1) to evaluate safety and efficacy of myocardial contrast echocardiography to detect TIMI flow grade 0--2, (2) to evaluate the success of reperfusion and (3) to predict left ventricular recovery after 4 weeks follow-up. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients underwent serial myocardial contrast echocardiography, immediately before primary PTCA (MCE1), 1 h (MCE2) and 12--24 h after PTCA (MCE3). A perfusion defect was observed in 21 of 24 patients (88%) with anterior acute myocardial infarction. All but one had TIMI flow grade 0--2 prior to PTCA. Nine of 31 patients (29%) with inferior acute myocardial infarction showed a perfusion defect and all had TIMI flow grade 0-2 prior to PTCA. Restoration of TIMI flow grade 3 was achieved in 73% of the patients by primary PTCA. A reduction in size of the initial perfusion defect of at least one segment (16 segment model) or no defect vs persistent defect in patients with anterior acute myocardial infarction was associated with improved global left ventricular function at 4 weeks; mean global wall motion score index 1.29+/-0.21 vs 1.66+/-0.31 (P=0.009). Multiple regression analysis in patients with an anterior acute myocardial infarction revealed that the extent of the perfusion defect at MCE3 was a significant (P=0.0005) independent predictor for left ventricular recovery at 4 weeks follow-up. The only other independent predictor was TIMI flow grade 3 post PTCA (P=0.007). CONCLUSION: Intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography immediately prior to primary PTCA seems safe and is capable of detecting the presence of a perfusion defect and its subsequent dynamic changes, particularly in patients with a first anterior acute myocardial infarction. A significant reduction in size of the initial perfusion defect using serial myocardial contrast echocardiography predicts functional recovery after 4 weeks and these findings underscore the potential diagnostic value of intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography.     

Early changes in myocardial perfusion patterns after myocardial infarction: relation with contractile reserve and functional recovery

Objectives. The purpose of this study was to assess early temporal changes in myocardial perfusion pattern by myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) and their relation to myocardial viability in patients with reperfused acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

Background. Myocardial contrast echocardiography no-reflow is associated with poor contractile recovery after AMI. However, little is known regarding early reversibility of microvascular dysfunction and its relation to myocardial viability.

Methods. Intracoronary MCE was performed immediately after reflow and 9 days later in 28 patients with a first AMI and successful coronary recanalization (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction trial grade 3 flow). Semiquantitative contrast score and wall motion score (WMS) were assessed in each initially asynergic segment at initial and repeat MCE study. Low dose dobutamine echocardiography (DE) was performed at day 10, and follow-up (FU) rest echocardiography was performed 6 weeks later.

Results. Among 200 initially asynergic segments, 49% exhibited no or heterogeneous contrast enhancement at initial MCE versus 24% at restudy (p < 0.001). Three groups of segments were defined according to early changes in contrast pattern: group A, “sustained no-reflow” (n = 17); group B, improved contrast score (n = 68), and group C, “sustained reflow” (n = 112). Group A segments showed no improvement in WMS at FU. In contrast, group B segments showed significant improvement in WMS at FU (p < 0.0001), and exhibited more frequently contractile reserve at DE (36% vs. 6%, p = 0.02) and contractile recovery at FU (34% vs. 7%, p = 0.03) than group A segments. Group C segments exhibited contractile reserve and contractile recovery in 47% and 51% of segments respectively.

Conclusions. Improvement in MCE perfusion pattern may occur after initial no-reflow in the days following reperfused AMI and is associated with preservation of contractile reserve and gradual regional functional recovery.     

Analysis of myocardial perfusion or myocardial function for detection of regional myocardial abnormalities. An echocardiographic multicenter comparison study using myocardial contrast echocardiography and 2D echocardiography.

BACKGROUND: Echocardiography based myocardial perfusion imaging and regional wall motion analysis are used for evaluation of coronary artery disease and regional myocardial abnormalities. AIM: This study sought to compare myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) and 2D echocardiography with regard to interobserver variability and detection of regional myocardial abnormalities. METHODS: In 70 patients evenly distributed between three ejection fraction groups based on biplane cineventriculography ( > 55%, 35-55%, < 35%), unenhanced and contrast enhanced 2D echocardiography and myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE; SonoVue; Bracco) were performed. Regional wall motion and myocardial perfusion were assessed referring to a 16 segment model. Interobserver agreement (IOA) among 2 readers was determined within each imaging modality. To define a standard of truth for the presence of segmental myocardial disease an independent expert-panel decision was obtained based on clinical data, ECG, coronary angiography and blinded information from the imaging modalities. RESULTS: Regional wall motion assessment was possible in 98.1% of segments using contrast enhanced 2D echocardiography and in 87.2% using unenhanced 2D echocardiography (p < 0.001), while perfusion assessment was possible in 90.1% of segments (p < 0.001). IOA on presence of any regional wall motion abnormality expressed as Kappa coefficient was 0.71 (95% CI 0.53-0.89) for contrast enhanced echocardiography and 0.37 (95% CI 0.14-0.59) for unenhanced echocardiography. IOA on presence of any perfusion abnormality was 0.53 (95% CI 0.34-0.73). For MCE there was high IOA for the apical segments (kappa = 0.57) and lower IOA for the basal segments (kappa=0.14), while no such gradient was found for the IOA on wall motion abnormalities. Mean accuracy to detect expert-panel defined myocardial abnormalities was 80.6% for unenhanced echocardiography, 85.0% for contrast enhanced 2D echocardiography and 80.6% for MCE. CONCLUSIONS: MCE is inferior to contrast enhanced 2D echocardiography with regard to visibility of all LV segments and appears slightly inferior with regards to IOA, while both are superior to unenhanced 2D echocardiography. The methods demonstrated high accuracy in detection of panel defined regional myocardial abnormalities.     

Clinical significance of perfusion techniques utilising different physiological mechanisms to detect myocardial viability: a comparative study with myocardial contrast echocardiography and single photon emission computed tomography

Myocardial uptake using (99m)Tc-sestamibi single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) depends largely on myocardial microvascular volume. Myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) is a relatively new technique that detects not only microvascular volume but also blood flow. These differing mechanisms may affect the relative accuracies of MCE and SPECT for detecting myocardial viability (MV) early after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and thrombolysis. Accordingly 56 patients underwent resting transthoracic echocardiography, low-power MCE and SPECT 7+/-2 days following first AMI and thrombolysis. Contractile reserve (CR) was assessed 3 months following revascularization. The sensitivity and specificity of MCE and SPECT were 83% and 78% (p=ns) and 78% and 45% (p<0.01) respectively. MCE was the only multivariate predictor of global recovery of function and CR (OR=3.5, p=0.01). The different physiological mechanisms employed by MCE and SPECT translate into different relative accuracies for the detection of MV.     

Coronary microcirculation. Physiologic and pathologic aspects]

The coronary circulation has a protective regulation system which, in extreme haemodynamic conditions, compensates increased myocardial oxygen demand. The coronary reserve, based on this concept defines the capacity of the system to increase flow temporally, and, thereby, myocardial oxygen supply. The introduction of new methods of investigating the coronary microcirculation has enabled the study of this phenomenon in several cardiovascular pathologies. Two types of investigation are used currently for studying the coronary microcirculation: 1) invasive methods, especially the recently developed intracoronary Doppler and pressure guide, 2) non-invasive methods, and, in particular, contrast echocardiography, position emission tomography and magnetic nuclear resonance. These investigations allow measurement of the coronary reserve or the assessment of the myocardial consequences of abnormalities of the microcirculation. Some workers use these methods to investigate pathological coronary microcirculation in different cardiomyopathies, in the presence of different cardiovascular risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, smoking, hypercholesterolaemia) and after cardiac transplantation.     

Effect of intracoronary estradiol on postischemic microvascular damage in a porcine model: a myocardial contrast echocardiographic study

Coronary microvascular damage can occur in the presence of myocardial ischemia even if epicardial vessels are patent, a phenomenon known as "no-reflow." Estrogens have favorable effects on coronary conductance and resistance arteries, and may have therapeutic value in ischemic syndromes. Myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) is a promising method for evaluating microvascular damage. In this study, the authors hypothesized that acute intracoronary 17beta-estradiol administration can reduce postischemic microvascular damage, which is evaluated by MCE, in a porcine model. Sixteen male pigs were randomized into 2 groups: the treatment group (n = 9) received intracoronary estradiol in increasing doses, and the control group (n = 7) received intracoronary vehicle (dimethylsulfoxide, DMSO). Microvascular damage was induced by balloon catheter occlusion followed by reperfusion of the left circumflex coronary artery (LCX). MCE using Levovist with harmonic imaging was performed before and during 15-minute balloon occlusion of the proximal LCX to determine perfusion areas of the left anterior descending artery (LAD) and LCX. MCE was performed immediately postocclusion and after each injection of estradiol (1, 10, and 100 nmol/L) or DMSO. Videodensitometry measurements were performed as a quantitative marker for myocardial microvascular damage. Videodensitometry results were expressed as peak intensity ratios. Intracoronary estradiol induced a significant reduction in myocardial microvascular damage after ischemic episode by videodensitometry measurements when compared to intracoronary DMSO. The authors conclude that intracoronary injection of estradiol reduces postischemic microvascular damage measured by MCE in a porcine model.