Bioavailability investigation of two different oral formulations of doxepin

Two different oral doxepin (CAS 1668-195) formulations (Doxepin-ratiopharm 25 mg film-coated tablets as test preparation and 25 mg dragées of the reference preparation) were investigated in 30 healthy male and female volunteers in order to prove bioequivalence between these preparations. A single 75 mg oral dose (3 units of test or reference preparation) was given according to a randomised two-way cross-over design in the fasted state. Blood samples for determination of plasma concentration of doxepin and its metabolite N-desmethyldoxepin were collected at pre-defined time points up to 168 h following drug administration. A wash-out period of three weeks separated both treatment periods. Doxepin and N-desmethyldoxepin plasma concentrations were determined by means of a validated LC-MS/MS method. Values of 193,463 pgh/ml (test preparation) and 197,988 pg h/ml (reference preparation) for doxepin as well as values of 313,298 pg h/ml (test preparation) and 306,663 pgh/ml (reference preparation) for N-desmethyldoxepin for the parameter AUC0-infinity demonstrate a nearly identical extent of drug absorption. Maximum concentrations (Cmax) for doxepin/N-desmethyldoxepin of 15,960.06/6,883.69 pg/ml and 18,614.73/6,846.62 pg/ml were achieved for test and reference preparation. Time to reach doxepin maximum plasma concentration (tmax) was 1.98 h for both preparations and for N-desmethyldoxepin tmax was 4.52 h (test preparation) and 4.15 h (reference preparation). Cmax and AUC0-infinity values were tested for statistically significant differences by means of the Two One-Sided T-Tests procedure following ln-transformation of data. Bioequivalence was assumed if the 90% confidence intervals of the T/R-ratios were in the range of 80%-125% for ln-transformed AUC0-infinity and 70%-143% for ln-transformed Cmax. Based on the results obtained in this study, bioequivalence between the test and the reference preparation was demonstrated.     

Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence study of doxycycline capsules in healthy male subjects

The aim of the present study was to compare the bioavailability of doxycycline (CAS 564-25-0) from two different doxycycline hyclate (CAS 24390-14-5) capsules (Monodoks 100 mg capsule as test preparation and 100 mg capsule of the originator product as reference preparation) in 24 healthy male subjects. The study was conducted according to an open-label, randomised two-period cross-over design with a wash-out phase of 16 days. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic profiling were taken up to 72 h post-dose, and doxycycline plasma concentrations were determined with a validated HPLC method with UV-detection. Maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax) of 1,715.1 ng/ml (test) and 1,613.3 ng/ml (reference) were achieved. Areas under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(0-infinity)) of 28,586.5 ng x h/ml (test) and 29,047.5 ng x h/ml (reference) were calculated. The median tmax was 1.88 h (test) and 2.00 h (reference). Plasma elimination half-lives (t1/2) of 16.49 h (test) and 16.75 h (reference) were determined. Both primary target parameters AUC(0-infinity) and Cmax were tested parametrically by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the 92.39 %-103.53% (AUC(0-infinity)) and 98.45%-111.74% (Cmax). Bioequivalence between test and reference preparation was demonstrated since for both parameters AUC and Cmax the 90% confidence intervals of the T/R ratios of logarithmically transformed data were in the generally accepted range of 80 0%-125%.     

Comparative pharmacokinetics of two tablet formulations of amoxicillin: bioequivalence assessment

The aim of the present study was to compare the bioavailability of amoxicillin (CAS 26787-78-0) from two different amoxicillin tablets (Demoksil 1 g tablet as test preparation and 1 g tablet of the originator product as reference preparation). The study was conducted according to an open-label, randomised two-period cross-over design with a wash-out phase of 4-7 days. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic profiling were taken up to 10 h post-dose, and amoxicillin plasma concentrations were determined with a validated LC-MS/ MS method. Maximum plasma concentrations (C(max)) of 13,296.4 ng/ml (test) and 12,797.7 ng/ml (reference) were achieved. Areas under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(0-infinity)) of 39,556.7 ng x h/ml (test) and 38,599.1 ng x h/ml (reference) were calculated. The median t(max) was 1.62 h (test) and 1.54 h (reference). Plasma elimination half-lives (t(1/2)) of 1.64 h (test) and 1.65 h (reference) were determined. Both primary target parameters, AUC(0-infinity) and C(max) were tested parametrically by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the 90% confidence intervals were between 96.76%-108.46% (AUC(0-infinity)) and 97.80%-111.98% (C(max)). Bioequivalence between test and reference preparation was demonstrated since for both parameters, AUC and C(max) the 90% confidence intervals of the T/R-ratios of logarithmically transformed data were in the generally accepted range of 80%-125%.     

Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence study of ranitidine film tablets in healthy male subjects

The aim of the present study was to compare the bioavailability of ranitidine (CAS 66357-35-5) from two different ranitidine hydrochloride (CAS 66357-59-3) film tablets (Ranitab 150 mg film tablets as test preparation and 150 mg film tablets of the originator product as reference preparation). The study was conducted according to an open-label, randomised two-period cross-over design with a wash-out phase of 9 days. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic profiling were taken up to 24 h post-dose, and ranitidine plasma concentrations were determined with a validated HPLC method with UV-detection. Maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax) of 461.8 ng/ml (test) and 450.6 ng/ ml (reference) were achieved. Areas under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC (0-infinity) of 2,488.6 ng . h/ml (test) and 2,528.8 ng . h/ml (reference) were calculated. The median tmax was 2.83 h (test) and 3.04 h (reference). Plasma elimination half-lives (t1/2) of 2.78 h (test) and 2.89 h (reference) were determined. Both primary target parameters AUC(0-infinity) and Cmax were tested parametrically by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the 90% confidence intervals were between 91.93 %-106.98 % (AUC (0-infinity) and 92.34%-118.85% (Cmax). Bioequivalence between test and reference preparation was demonstrated since for both parameters AUC and Cmax the 90 % confidence intervals of the T/R ratios of logarithmically transformed data were in the generally accepted range of 80 %-125 %.     

Comparative bioavailability study of two cefixime formulations administered orally in healthy male volunteers

The bioavailability of a new cefixime ((6R,7R)-7-[(Z)-2-(2-amino-4-thiazolyl)-2-(carboxymethoxyimino) acetamido]-8-oxo-3-vinyl-5-thia-1-azabicyclo-[4,2,0]-oct-2-ene-2-carboxylic acid, CAS 79350-37-1) tablet preparation (Loprax) was compared with that of a reference preparation of the drug in 24 healthy male volunteers. The trial was designed as an open, randomized, single-blind, two-sequence, two-period crossover study. Under fasting conditions, each subject received a single oral dose of 400 mg cefixime tablet as a test or reference formulation on 2 treatment days. The treatment periods were separated by a one-week washout period. The plasma concentrations of the drug were analyzed by a rapid and sensitive HPLC method with UV detection. The pharmacokinetic parameters included AUC0-24h, AUC0-infinity, Cmax, t1/2, and Ke. The mean AUC0-infinity of cefixime was 45008.7 +/- 10989.9 and 45221.3 +/- 2155.7 n x h/ml for the test and reference formulation, respectively. The maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of cefixime was on average 4746.9 +/- 1284 ng/ml for the test and 4726.3 +/- 1206.9 ng/ml for the reference product. No statistical differences were observed for Cmax and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve for test and reference tablets. The calculated 90% confidence intervals based on the ANOVA analysis for the mean test/reference ratios of Cmax, AUC0-infinity and AUC0-24h of cefixime were in the bioequivalence range (94%-112%). Therefore, the two formulations were considered to be bioequivalent.     

Bioavailability investigation of two different oral formulations of Tetrazepam

Two different oral tetrazepam (CAS 10379-14-3) formulations (Tetrazepam-ratiopharm film-coated tablets as test preparation and tablets of a reference preparation marketed in France) were investigated in 20 healthy volunteers in order to prove bioequivalence between these preparations. A single 50 mg oral dose was given according to a randomised two-way crossover design in the fasted state. Blood samples for determination of tetrazepam plasma concentrations were collected at pre-defined time points up to 96 h following drug administration. A washout period of 14 days separated both treatment periods. Tetrazepam plasma concentrations were determined by means of a validated LC-MS/MS method. Values of 3873.08 ngh/ml (test preparation) and 3930.69 ngh/ml (reference preparation) for the parameter AUC0-infinity demonstrate an nearly identical extent of drug absorption. Maximum concentrations (Cmax) of 482.08 ng/ml and 465.14 ng/ml were achieved for test and reference preparation. Time to reach maximum plasma concentration (tmax) was 1.39 hours for both preparations. Cmax and AUC0-infinity-values were tested parametrically by an analysis of variance (ANOVA). Bioequivalence was concluded if the 90% confidence intervals of the T/R-ratios were in the range of 80%-125% for AUC0-infinity and 70%-143% for Cmax. Based on the results obtained in this study, bioequivalence between the test and the reference preparation was demonstrated.     

Bioequivalence study of sultamicillin suspensions

Sultamicillin (CAS 76497-13-7) is a prodrug combination of ampicillin (CAS 69-53-4) and sulbactam (CAS 68373-14-8), with the antibiotic ampicillin and the beta-lactamase inhibitor sulbactam chemically linked as double ester. The present study was performed to investigate the relative bioavailability and to assess the bioequivalence of two different sultamicillin suspensions (Devasid 250 mg/5 ml as test preparation and 375 mg/7.5 ml of the originator product as reference preparation). Twenty-four healthy male volunteers received equal doses of the sultamicillin preparations according to an open, randomised, single-dose, two-period cross-over design with a wash-out phase of 7 days. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic profiling were taken up to 8 h post-dose, and ampicillin and sulbactam plasma concentrations were determined with a validated LC-MS/MS method. Maximum plasma concentrations (C(max)) of 11,267.4 ng/ml (ampicillin, test), 10,864.4 ng/ml (ampicillin, reference), 6,360.6 ng/ml (sulbactam, test and 6,410.7 ng/ml (sulbactam, reference) were achieved. Areas under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(0-infinity) of 17,512.9 ng x h/ml (ampicillin, test), 18,388.0 ng x h/ml (ampicillin, reference), 10,971.7 ng ng x h/ml (sulbactam, test) and 11,181.2 ng x h/ml (sulbactam, reference) were calculated. The median t(max) was 0.69 h (ampicillin, test), 0.85 h (ampicillin, reference), 0.72 h (sulbactam, Devasid) and 0.83 h (sulbactam, reference). Plasma elimination half-lives (t(1/2)) of 1.04 h (ampicillin, test), 1.03 h (ampicillin, reference), 1.26 h (sulbactam, Devasid) and 1.00 h (sulbactam, reference) were determined. Both primary target parameters AUC(0-infinity) and C(max) of ampicillin and sulbactam were tested parametrically by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the 90% confidence intervals were between 84.58%-117.80% (AUC(0-infinity), ampicillin), 92.37%-119.93% (C(max), ampicillin), 85.81%-120.50% (AUC(0-infinity), sulbactam) and 88.41%-117.57% (C(max), sulbactam). Bioequivalence between test and reference preparation was demonstrated since for both parameters AUC and C(max) the 90% confidence intervals of the T/R-ratios of logarithmically transformed data were in the generally accepted range of 80%-125%.     

Pharmacokinetic and bioequivalence study of meloxicam tablets in healthy male subjects

Meloxicam (CAS 71125-38-7), a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), is used for the treatment of osteoarthritis and rheumatic arthritis. In the present study, two different oral meloxicam formulations (Melcam 15 mg tablets as test preparation and tablets of a reference preparation) were investigated in 24 healthy male subjects in order to prove bioequivalence between both preparations. A single 15 mg oral dose was administered according to an open, randomised, two-period cross-over design in the fasted state. Blood samples for the determination of meloxicam plasma concentrations were collected at pre-defined time points up to 96 h following drug administration. A wash-out period of 7-8 days separated both treatment periods. Meloxicam plasma concentrations were determined by means of a validated HPLC method with UV-detection. Maximum plasma concentrations (C(max)) of 1,146.9 ng/ml (test) and 1,064.8 ng/ml (reference) were achieved. Areas under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(0-infinity) of 34,499.0 ng x h/ml (test) and 33,784.3 ng x h/ml (reference) were determined. The results showed nearly identical rate and extent of drug absorption. Also further pharmacokinetic parameters were well comparable. Thus, t(max) showed values of 5.00 h for both test and reference. The plasma elimination half-life (t1/2) was 18.29 h (test) und 18.94 h (reference). Both primary target parameters C(max). and AUC(0-infinity, were tested parametrically by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the 90% confidence intervals were between 99.46%-105.24% (AUC0-infinity)) and 103.37%-112.46% (C(max)). Bioequivalence between test and reference preparation was demonstrated since for both parameters AUC and C(max) the 90% confidence intervals of the T/R ratios of logarithmically transformed data were in the generally accepted range of 80%-125%.     

Bioavailability investigation of two different oral formulations of citalopram, a so-called 'second generation' antidepressant drug

Citalopram (CAS 59729-33-8) belongs to the so-called 'second generation' antidepressant drugs and is used for the treatment of patients with major depression or other depressive disorders. In the present study, two different oral citalopram formulations (Citalopram-ratiopharm film-coated tablets as test preparation and tablets of a reference preparation distributed in Germany) were investigated in 20 healthy volunteers in order to prove bioequivalence between both preparations. A single 40 mg oral dose was administered according to an open, randomised, two-period cross-over design in the fasted state. Blood samples for determination of citalopram plasma concentrations were collected at pre-defined time points up to 168 h following drug administration. A wash-out period of 21 days separated both treatment periods. Citalopram plasma concentrations were determined by means of a validated HPLC method with fluorescence detection. Maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax), of 34.77 ng/ml (test) and 34.42 ng/ml (reference) were achieved. Areas under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC0-infinity) of 1,719.69 ng*h/ml (test) and 1,725.71 ng*h/ml (reference) were determined. The results showed nearly identical rate and extent of drug absorption. Also further pharmacokinetic parameters were well comparable with each other. Thus, tmax showed values of 3.29 h (test) and 3.77 h (reference). The plasma elimination half-life (t1/2) was 42.50 h (test) und 44.46 h (reference). Both primary target parameters Cmax and AUC0-infinity were tested parametrically by analysis of variance (ANOVA). Bioequivalence between test and reference preparation was demonstrated since for both parameters AUC and Cmax the 90 % confidence intervals of the T/R-ratios of logarithmically transformed data were in the generally accepted range of 80 %-125 %.     

Bioavailability investigation of two different oral formulations of methylprednisolone

Two different oral methylprednisolone (CAS 83-43-2) formulations (Methylprednisolon-ratiopharm 8 mg tables as test preparation (T) and tablets of a reference preparation (R)) were investigated in 16 healthy volunteers in order to prove bioequivalence between these preparations. A single 8 mg oral dose was given according to a randomised two-way crossover design in the fasted state. Blood samples for determination of methylprednisolone plasma concentrations were collected at pre-defined time points up to 16 h following drug administration. A washout period of 3 days separated both treatment periods. Methylprednisolone plasma concentrations were determined by means of a validated HPLC method. Values of 342.53 ng.h/ml (test preparation) and 336.61 ng.h/ml (reference preparation) for the parameter AUC0-infinity demonstrate an nearly identical extent of drug absorption. Maximum concentrations (Cmax) of 66.58 ng/ml and 70.51 ng/ml were achieved for test and reference preparation. Time to reach maximum plasma concentration (tmax) was 2.2 h for both preparations. Cmax and AUC0-infinity-values were tested parametrically by the two one-sided t-test procedure. Bioequivalence was concluded if the 90% confidence intervals of the T/R-ratios were in the range of 80-125% for AUC0-infinity and 70-143% for Cmax. Based on the results obtained in this study, bioequivalence between Methylprednisolone ratiopharm and the reference preparation was demonstrated.     

Bioavailability and selected pharmacokinetic parameters of clindamycin hydrochloride after administration of a new 600 mg tablet formulation.

The study was conducted to investigate the pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability of clindamycin after administration of two oral clindamycin HCl formulations. A new tablet preparation containing 600 mg clindamycin (Clinda-saar 600, test) was compared to a marketed capsule containing 300 mg clindamycin (Sobelin 300, reference). Both preparations revealed comparable in vitro dissolution profiles with high batch conformity and homogeneity. Twenty healthy male volunteers received single doses of 600 mg clindamycin (test: 1 tablet, reference: 2 capsules) in an open, randomized, two-period crossover design. Blood samples were drawn up to 14 h p.a. and clindamycin plasma concentrations were measured using a sensitive and specific HPLC-UV method. Pharmacokinetic characteristics were similar for both preparations, arithmetic mean values (standard deviation) were computed as: AUC(0-infinity) 12.2 (4.2) and 13.1 (4.6) microg x h/ml, Cmax 3.1 (0.8) and 3.4 (0.8) microg/ml, t(max) 0.83 (0.24) and 0.85 (0.34) h, t(1/2) 2.3 (0.4) and 2.3 (0.6) h for test and reference, respectively. Mean relative bioavailability (point estimate) was 93% for AUC and 91% for Cmax. 90% confidence intervals for AUC and Cmax were within the predefined bioequivalence acceptance limits. Bioequivalence of test and reference preparations could be demonstrated. Single doses of 600 mg clindamycin orally were well tolerated without relevant differences between both preparations.     

Technological evaluation and equivalence assessment of lorazepam tablets in rabbits

Four different oral lorazepam tablets (Tavor tablets as reference preparation and three generic tablet formulations, A, B and C) were investigated after administration to 12 rabbits to evaluate their bioequivalence. A single 2 mg/kg dose was administered orally as powder and lorazepam plasma concentrations were determined by a validated HPLC method. Maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax), of 207 ng/ml (reference), 198 ng/ml (A), 166 ng/ml (B) and 169 ng/ml (C) were achieved. Lorazepam appeared in the plasma at 0.66 h (Tmax) for all formulations, probably because the disintegration step was bypassed due to the pulverization of the administered doses. Areas under the plasma concentration-time curves (AUC(0-t) and AUC(0-infinity)) were determined. The obtained AUC(0-t) values were 556.57 ng h/ml (reference), 554.70 ng h/ml (A), 493.08 ng h/ml (B), and 487.88 ng h/ml (C). ANOVA results (P > or = 0.05) and 90% confidence intervals for the mean ratio (T/R) of AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity), and Cmax were within the EMEA acceptance range. Pharmacokinetic and statistical results of this study show that the four tested drug products (Tavor, A, B, C) are to be considered bioequivalent and interchangeable in medical practice.     

Bioequivalence study of two losartan formulations administered orally in healthy male volunteers

The bioavailability of a new losartan preparation (2-butyl-4-chloro-1-[p-(o-1H-tetrazol-5-ylphenyl)benzyl]imidazole-5-methanol monopotassium salt, CAS 114798-26-4) was compared with the reference preparation of the drug in 24 healthy male volunteers, aged between 19 and 32. The open, randomized, single-blind two-sequence, two-period crossover study design was performed. Under fasting conditions, each subject received a single oral dose of 100 mg losartan as a test or reference formulation. The plasma concentrations of losartan and its active metabolite were analyzed by a rapid and sensitive HPLC method with UV detection. The pharmacokinetic parameters included AUC0-36h, AUC0-infinity, Cmax, t1/2, and Ke. Values of AUC0-infinity demonstrate nearly identical bioavailability of losartan from the examined formulations. The AUC0-infinity of losartan was 2019.92+/-1002.90 and 2028.58+/-837.45 ng x h/ml for the test and reference formulation, respectively. The AUC0-infinity of the metabolite was 10851.52+/-4438.66 and 11041.18 +/-5015.81 ng x h/ml for test and reference formulation, respectively. The maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of losartan was 745.94+/-419.75 ng/ml for the test and 745.74+/-329.99 ng/ml for the reference product and the Cmax of the metabolite was 1805.77+/-765.39 and 1606.22 +/-977.22 ng/ml for the test and reference product, respectively. No statistical differences were observed for Cmax and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve for both losartan and its active metabolite. 90 % confidence limits calculated for Cmax and AUC from zero to infinity (AUC0-infinity) of losartan and its metabolite were included in the bioequivalence range (0.8-1.25 for AUC). This study shows that the test formulation is bioequivalent to the reference formulation for losartan and its main active metabolite.     

Comparative bioavailability study of two preparations of letrozole in healthy subjects

The bioavailability of a new letrozole (CAS 112809-51-5) preparation was compared with the reference preparation of the drug in 25 healthy volunteers, aged between 18 and 33. A single dose of 2.5 mg was given orally in the fasted state, using a randomized two-way, cross-over protocol. A washout period of two weeks separated both treatment periods. Blood samples were obtained at regular time intervals, until 312 h after drug administration. After solid phase extraction (SPE) letrozole plasma levels were measured by high pressure liquid chromatography that was validated before the start of the study (UV detector, fluoroletrozole as an internal standard). The limit of quantification was 1.4 nmol/ml. The following pharmacokinetics parameters were calculated from letrozole plasma concentrations: AUC(0-infinity), AUC(0-t), Cmax, tmax, F(rel), MRT, t(1/2), k(el). The confidence intervals for the statistical calculations of AUC(0-infinity), Cmax, tmax were 95 % and AUC(0-t), MRT, t(1/2), k(el) were tested by means of the unpaired t-tests procedure and after logarithmic transformation for overall significant differences using analysis of variance--three-way ANOVA. The AUC(0-infinity) ratio test/reference and the 90 % confidence interval were 99.52 %, and 94.05-107.31%, respectively. The Cmax ratio test/reference and the 90 % confidence interval were 89.18 %, and 84.48-98.60%, respectively. AUC(0-infinity) and Cmax ratios (90 % CI) were within the 80-125 % interval required for bioequivalence as stipulated in the current international regulations of the European Agency for the Evalution of Medicinal Products and the Food and Drug Administration. Therefore it is concluded that the new letrozole preparation is therapeutically equivalent to the reference preparation for both the extent and the rate of absorption after single dose administration in healthy volunteers.     

Bioequivalence study of two limaprost alfadex 5 microg tablets in healthy subjects: moisture-resistant tablet (dextran formulation) versus standard tablet (lactose formulation)

OBJECTIVE: A study was conducted to assess the bioequivalence of two limaprost alfadex 5 microg tablets, a moisture-resistant tablet (dextran formulation) and a standard tablet (lactose formulation). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The clinical investigation was designed as a randomized, open-labeled, two-part, two-treatment, two-period crossover study, in 120 healthy male volunteers. One tablet of either formulation was administered with 200 ml of water after 10-hour overnight fast. After dosing, serial blood samples were collected for a period of 6 hours. Plasma harvested from blood was analyzed for limaprost by a validated LC/MS/MS method. The peak plasma concentration (Cmax) values and time associated with the maximal concentration (tmax) were obtained from the observed data. The elimination rate constant (lambda z) was obtained as the slope of the linear regression of the log-transformed concentration values vs. time data in the terminal phase, and the elimination half-life (t1/2) was calculated as 0.693/lambda z. The area under the curve to the last measurable point (AUC0-t) was estimated by the linear trapezoidal rule. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) was carried out using log-transformed AUC0-t, AUC0-A yen and Cmax and untransformed tmax, and 90% confidence intervals for AUC0-t and Cmax were calculated. If the 90% confidence intervals (CI) for both AUC0-t and Cmax fell fully within the interval 80 - 125%, the bioequivalence of the two formulations was established. RESULTS: The means of AUC0-t were 0.779 vs. 0.754 pg x h/ml (test vs. reference), and the means of the Cmax were 1.26 vs. 1.12 pg/ml (test vs. reference). The geometric mean ratios of the test formulation to reference formulation for AUC0-t and Cmax were 104.0 and 112.4%, respectively, and the 90% CI for AUC0-t and Cmax were 100.7 - 107.4% and 105.6 - 119.6%, respectively. Both 90% CI for AUC0-t and Cmax fell within the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan accepted bioequivalence range of 80 - 125%. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results, the moisture-resistant tablet was determined to be bioequivalent to the standard tablet.     

Bioequivalence study of two oral formulations of cefadroxil in healthy volunteers

Two different cefadroxil (CAS 50370-12-2) formulations were evaluated for their relative bioavailability in 24 healthy volunteers who received a single 500 mg oral dose of each preparation. An open, randomized clinical trial designed as a two-period crossover study with a 7-day washout period between doses was employed. Plasma samples for assessments of their cefadroxil concentration by HPLC-UV were obtained over 8 h after administration. Values of 48.94 +/- 10.18 pg x h/ml for test, and 48.51 +/- 9.02 microg x h/ml for the reference preparation AUC(0-t) demonstrate a nearly identical extend of drug absorption. Maximum plasma concentration Cmax of 16.04 +/- 4.94 microg/ml and 16.01 + 4.02 microg/ml achieved for the test and reference preparations did not differ significantly. The parametric 90% confidence intervals (CI) of the mean of the difference (test-reference) between log-transformed values of the two formulations were 96.80% to 104.51% and 92.01% to 107.00% for AUC(0-t) and Cmax, respectively. Since for both AUC(0-t) or Cmax the 90% CI values are within the interval proposed by the Food and Drug Administration, the test product is bioequivalent to the reference product for both the rate and extent of absorption after single dose administration.     

Relative bioavailability and pharmacokinetic study of two trimetazidine modified release formulations in healthy Bangladeshi male volunteers

Trimetazidine (CAS 5011-34-7) is an effective and well-tolerated antianginal drug that possesses protective properties against ischemia-induced heart injury. The relative bioavailability and pharmacokinetic characteristics of two modified release formulations of 35 mg trimetazidine, one as the test product (Metacard MR) and one as the reference product, were compared in healthy Bangladeshi male volunteers. The randomized, two-way crossover study was conducted in 24 healthy male volunteers after administration of a single 35 mg dose of each modified release formulation after 12-h overnight fasting, with a washout period of two weeks. Blood samples were collected at various time intervals following oral administration and analyzed for trimetazidine concentrations using a validated HPLC method. The pharmacokinetic parameters were determined by a non-compartmental method. After administering a single dose of 35 mg of each trimetazidine formulation, the obtained mean (SD) values for the test and reference products were 104.78 (29.3) and 98.57 (28.7) ng/ml for Cmax; 4.00 (1.1) and 3.54 (1.32) h for t(max); 423.81 (173.9) and 410.01 (195.87) ng x h/ml for AUC0-12; and 472.51 (195.2) and 462.78 (225.13) ng x h/ml for AUC0-infinity respectively. The mean t1/2 was found 3.69 (1.1) h and 3.45 (0.72) h for test and reference products respectively. From paired t-test, no significant differences were observed (p > 0.05) for any pharmacokinetic parameters. The 90% confidence intervals of the test/reference mean ratios of the In-transformed AUC0-12, AUC0-infinity, and Cmax mean values were 106.19% (97.16%-116.06%), 104.74% (95.04%-115.42%) and 106.30% (95.23%-118.66%), respectively. The two formulations demonstrated similar bioavailability with respect to both the rate and extent of trimetazidine absorption.     

Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence study of two digoxin formulations after single-dose administration in healthy Chinese male volunteers

The pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability/bioequivalence of two formulations of digoxin (CAS 20830-75-5) were assessed in this paper. The study was conducted in 20 healthy Chinese male volunteers according to an open, randomized, single-blind, 2-way crossover study design with a wash-out phase of 14 days. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic profiling were taken up to 72 h post-dose and digoxin plasma concentrations were determined by a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LCMS/MS) method. Based on the plasma concentration-time data of each individual during two periods, pharmacokinetic parameters, Cmax, AUC0-tau, AUC0-infinity and t1/2, were calculated by applying noncompartmental analysis. Pharmacokinetic data for test and reference formulations were analyzed statistically to evaluate bioequivalence of the two formulations. After oral administration, the values of Cmax Tmax, t1/2, AUC0-tau, AUC0-infinity for test and reference formulations were 2.61 +/- 0.98 and 2.68 +/- 1.09 ng/ mL, 1.0 +/- 0.4 and 1.0 +/- 0.4 h, 27.94 +/- 3.14 and 27.56 +/- 3.86 h, 28.57 +/- 4.99 and 28.77 +/- 6.53 ng x h/mL, 33.44 +/- 4.85 and 33.63 +/- 7.57 ng x h/mL, respectively. Both primary target parameters, AUC0-infinity and AUC0-tau, were tested parametrically by analysis of variance (ANOVA). Relative bioavailabilities were 102.5 +/- 19.2% for AUC0-infinity, 102.0 +/- 19.3% for AUC0-tau. Bioequivalence between test and reference formulations was demonstrated for both parameters, AUC0-infinity and AUC0-tau. The 90% confidence intervals of the T/R-ratios of logarithmically transformed data were in the generally accepted range of 80%-125%, which means that the test formulation is bioequivalent to the reference formulation of digoxin.     

Bioequivalence study of finasteride. Determination in human plasma by high-pressure liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry

Two different finasteride (CAS 98319-26-7) tablet formulations were evaluated for their relative bioavailability (Flaxin tablets 5 mg, as the test formulation vs reference formulation, tablets 5 mg) in 23 healthy male volunteers who received a single 5 mg oral dose of each preparation. The study was open, randomized with a two-period crossover design and a 7-day washout period. Plasma samples were obtained over a 48-h interval. The finasteride concentrations were determined by high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS). The analytical method developed has a limit of quantitation (LOQ) of 0.50 ng/ml in plasma. For the quality control the measured concentration was 2.05 +/- 0.14 ng/ml (mean +/- SD, n = 30) with a precision of 6.9% and an accuracy of 2.55% at a concentration of the starting solution of 2.00 ng/ml, while with 20.00 ng/ml starting solution the measured concentrations were 20 +/- 0.80 ng/ml (n = 30) with a precision of 3.81% and an accuracy of 0.09%. From the plasma finasteride concentration vs time curves the following pharmacokinetics parameters were obtained: AUC0-48, AUC0-infinity, Cmax, Cmax/AUC0-48, Ke, elimination half-life and tmax. Geometric mean test/reference formulations individual percent ratio was 95.71 for AUC0-48 h and 88.70% for Cmax. The 90% confidence interval for the geometric mean of the individual ratio test/reference formulations was 95.70-120.20% for AUC0-48 h, 94.60-121.30 for AUC0-infinity and 88.70-108% for Cmax. Since for both Cmax or AUC the 90% Cl values are within the interval proposed by the Food and Drug Administration, the test formulation is bioequivalent to the reference formulation for both the rate and extent of absorption after single dose administration.     

Bioequivalence of different prednisolone tablet formulations

The relative bioavailability of different prednisolone (CAS 50-24-8) tablet formulations (Prednisolon Ferring 2, 5, and 20 mg) was investigated in comparison to a reference formulation. The study was performed in a GCP/ICH-conform manner using a randomized cross-over design in 13 healthy volunteers. With respect to the pharmacokinetic parameters Cmax (maximal prednisolone concentration), AUC0-12 h (area under the concentration-time curve until 12 h after drug intake), AUC0-infinity (area under the concentration-time curve until infinity), and t1/2 (elimination half-life time), 10 x 2 mg prednisolone tablets did not show any relevant differences as compared to the reference (1 x 20 mg) meaning that the 90% confidence intervals were within the given 0.80-1.25 limits for the decision of bioequivalence. Although not statistically significant, tmax (time to reach the maximal prednisolone plasma concentration) was 11 min shorter regarding the test preparation as compared to the reference. The pharmacokinetic parameters of 4 x 5 prednisolone tablets were also well in accordance with the reference. The most important parameters Cmax, AUC and t1/2 were within the defined limits for the acceptance of bioequivalence and, in addition, tmax did not show any significant differences. The 20 mg prednisolone tablet formulation showed almost identical parameters of Cmax, AUC, t1/2 und tmax in comparison to the reference substance. Taken together, the results of the bioavailability parameters indicate the bioequivalence of the three prednisolone test preparations as compared to the reference.