'Rescue' therapies for the management of Helicobacter pylori infection

Helicobacter pylori infection is the main cause of gastritis, gastroduodenal ulcer and gastric cancer and should be considered as a major public health issue. According to several international guidelines, first-line therapy for treating H. pylori infection consists of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) or ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC) with any two antibiotics of amoxicillin, clarithromycin or metronidazole given for 7-14 days. However, even with the recommended treatment regimens, approximately 20% of patients will fail to obtain H. pylori eradication. The proportion of patients with first-line H. pylori therapy failure may be higher in clinical practice and it may increase thanks to diffusion of H. pylori treatment. The recommended second-line therapy is the quadruple regimen composed by tetracycline, metronidazole, bismuth salts and a PPI. However, the efficacy of this regimen is limited by poor patient's compliance due to its side effects, number of tablets per day, and long duration. Moreover, bismuth and metronidazole are not available in all countries. Alternatively, a longer-lasting (i.e. 10-14 days) PPI or RBC triple therapy with two antibiotics has generally been used. In an empirical strategy, the choice of second line depends on the treatment initially used. If a clarithromycin-based regimen was administered in first line, a quadruple regimen or PPI (or RBC) triple therapy with metronidazole and amoxicillin (or tetracycline) should be suggested as a second line. In case of second-line treatment failure, the patient should be evaluated by a case-by-case approach. A susceptibility-guided strategy, if available, is recommended in order to choose the best third-line treatment. Culture can reveal the presence of H. pylori-sensitive strains to clarithromycin (the best effective) or other antimicrobials (such as amoxicillin, metronidazole and tetracycline). Conversely, in an empirical strategy, a third-line not yet used therapy, can reach a high success rate. PPI or RBC, amoxicillin and a new antimicrobial (e.g. rifabutin, levofloxacin or furazolidone) could be used. Several studies have obtained relatively good results with triple therapy combining PPI, rifabutin, and amoxicillin, although a reversible myelotoxicity as leukopenia and thrombocytopenia has been described. Preliminary good results were also achieved with triples PPI regimens combining levofloxacin and amoxicillin without important adverse effects. Furazolidone has also shown efficacy for H. pylori eradication, although untoward reactions could limit its use, especially when high doses are employed. Finally, in more than one H. pylori treatment failure, non-antimicrobial add-on medications (such as lactoferrin, probiotics and others) could be used with the aim either to improve the eradication rate or to minimize side effects.     

Treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection]

Significant progress and new insights have been gained since Helicobacter pylori was found in 1982. Even with currently most effective treatment regimen, about 10-20% of patients will fail to obtain the eradication of H. pylori infection. This review will focus on the empirical treatment for H. pylori infection in Korea. Seven days triple therapy (proton pump inhibitor, amoxicillin and clarithromycin) has been the main first line therapy for H. pylori infection in Korea after the recommendation by Korean H. pylori study group in 1998. Such triple therapy has been the effective regimen for eradication of H. pylori infection. However, the efficacy of 7 days proton pump inhibitor-amoxicillin-clarithromycin therapy becomes lower and various eradication rates probably reflects the increase in antimicrobial resistance, recently. The recent multi-center prospective randomized study and meta-analysis showed 14 days proton pump inhibitor-amoxicillin-clarithromycin therapy is more effective than 7 days or 10 days therapy. In the case of failure, quadruple therapy (proton pump inhibitor, a bismuth salt, metronidazole and tetracycline) is a very effective second-line regimen. After the failure of two or more eradication treatments, bacterial resistance to antibiotics should be evaluated and the regimen of third-line therapy should be selected according to each antimicrobial susceptibility. The empirical third-line therapies, recommended in the cases that antimicrobial susceptibility test is unavailable, are unclear of its validity at present in Korea. The triple therapies including rifabutin, moxifloxacin, or levofloxacin or dual therapy including high dose proton pump inhibitor and amoxicillin are needed to be proven as possible candidates for the empirical third-line therapy. Multiple eradication failures should be handled on a case-by-case basis by specialists.     

Attitude facing a patient suffering from Helicobacter pylori infection resistant to a triple therapy.

Even with the current most effective treatment regimens, about 10-20% of patients will fail to eradicate H. pylori infection. Therefore, in designing a treatment strategy we should not focus on the results of primary therapy alone, but also on the final (over-all) eradication rate. The choice of a second-line treatment depends on which treatment was used initially, as retreatment with the same regimen is not recommended. In this respect, the first therapy should not be a regimen that combines clarithromycin and metronidazole in the same regimen, because of the problem of resistance against both antibiotics. Therefore, it seems that performing culture after a first eradication failure is not necessary and assessing H. pylori sensitivity to antibiotics only after failure of the second treatment may be suggested in clinical practice. Different possibilities of empirical treatment are suggested. After failure of proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-amoxicillin-clarithromycin, quadruple therapy has been generally used. More recently, replacing the PPI and the bismuth compound by ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC) has also achieved good results. After PPI-amoxicillin-nitroimidazole failure, retreatment with PPI-amoxicillin-clarithromycin has proved to be effective. Finally, rifabutin-based rescue therapies have shown to constitute an encouraging strategy for eradication failures, as they are effective for H. pylori strains resistant to antibiotics.     

How to proceed in Helicobacter pylori-positive chronic gastritis refractory to first- and second-line eradication therapy

Helicobacter pylori is a widespread disease causing most of the peptic ulcer diseases and low-grade mucosa-associated lymphoreticular tissue (MALT) lymphoma. Moreover, H. pylori is a proven environmental risk factor for gastric carcinoma and it has been recognized as a type 1 carcinogen factor. A combination of drugs has been proposed, using a proton pump inhibitor (PPI), amoxicillin, clarithromycin, metronidazole and tetracycline to treat the infection. Since 1996, according to the European guidelines, the first-line approach using PPI, amoxicillin and clarithromycin or metronidazole has been suggested. Seven days of quadruple therapy with PPI (or ranitidine), tetracycline, bismuth salts and metronidazole has been reserved as second-line treatment. To improve the eradication rate of the triple therapy, a different combination of the available antibiotics has been proposed, consisting of a 10-day sequential regimen. A second-line levofloxacin-amoxicillin-based triple therapy given for 10 days has been proposed, obtaining a high eradication rate, suggesting this regimen to be a suitable retreatment option in eradication failure. A third-line treatment with rifabutin-based regimen has been proposed.     

Helicobacter pylori therapy: first-line options and rescue regimen

In the present paper, several points regarding Helicobacter pylori treatment are reviewed, with the following conclusions: (1) all different proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are equivalent when prescribed with antibiotics; (2) ranitidine bismuth citrate is equal to or, in some cases with antibiotic resistance, more effective than PPI; (3) previous treatment with PPI does not seem to affect the rate of eradication obtained with PPI plus two antibiotics; (4) just 1 week of PPI is enough to obtain duodenal ulcer healing, provided that H. pylori eradication is achieved; (5) the eradication rates seem to be higher in peptic ulcer than in nonulcer dyspepsia; (6) in areas where the prevalence of metronidazole resistance is high, triple therapy including a PPI, clarithromycin, and amoxicillin is the best option, and (7) quadruple therapy (PPI, bismuth, tetracycline, and metronidazole) is the recommended second-line therapy after PPI-clarithromycin-amoxicillin failure, although replacing the PPI and the bismuth compound by ranitidine bismuth citrate achieves also good results.     

Optimal therapy for Helicobacter pylori infections

Although Helicobacter pylori infection is both a common and a serious bacterial infection, antimicrobial therapies have rarely been optimized, are prescribed empirically, and provide inferior results compared with antimicrobial therapies for other common infectious diseases. The effectiveness of many of the frequently recommended H. pylori infection treatment regimens has been increasingly compromised by antimicrobial resistance. Regional data on the susceptibility of strains of H. pylori to available antimicrobials are sorely needed. Noninvasive molecular methods are possible to assess clarithromycin susceptibility in isolates obtained from stool specimens. As a general rule, clinicians should prescribe therapeutic regimens that have a ≥90% or, preferably, ≥95% eradication rate locally. If no available regimen can achieve a ≥90% eradication rate, clinicians should use the most effective regimen(s) available locally. Eradication of infection should always be confirmed after treatment in order to provide feedback regarding local effectiveness and an early warning of increasing resistance. In most regions of the world, four-drug treatment regimens, including a PPI plus three antimicrobials (clarithromycin, metronidazole/tinidazole and amoxicillin), or a PPI plus a bismuth plus tetracycline and metronidazole provide the best results. Standard triple therapy (a PPI, amoxicillin and clarithromycin) should now be avoided owing to increasing resistance to this treatment.     

Treatment of <Emphasis Type="Italic">helicobacter pylori</Emphasis> eradication failures

Opinion statement Even with the current most effective treatment regimens, about 10% to 20% of patients will fail to eradicate Helicobacter pylori infection. Therefore, in designing a treatment strategy, we should not focus on the results of primary therapy alone but also on the final (overall) eradication rate. The choice of a second-line treatment depends on which treatment was used initially, because retreatment with the same regimen is not recommended. Therefore, it seems that performing culture after a first eradication failure is not necessary and assessing H. pylori sensitivity to antibiotics only after failure of the second treatment is suggested in clinical practice. Different possibilities of empirical treatment are suggested. After failure of proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-amoxicillin-clarithromycin, quadruple therapy has been generally used. More recently, replacing the PPI and the bismuth compound by ranitidine bismuth citrate has also achieved good results. After PPI-amoxicillin-nitroimidazole failure, retreatment with PPI-amoxicillin-clarithromycin has proved to be effective. Finally, the first therapy should not combine clarithromycin and metronidazole in the same regimen because of the problem of resistance against both antibiotics. Recently, rifabutin-based rescue therapies have been shown to constitute an encouraging strategy for eradication failures because they are effective for H. pylori strains resistant to antibiotics.     

Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy in Korea

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is known to be associated with many gastrointestinal diseases including peptic ulcer. In Korea, eradication of H. pylori is recommended for peptic ulcer disease, low grade gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma, and early gastric cancer. Standard triple therapy using proton pump inhibitor, clarithromycin, and amoxicillin and bismuth-containing quadruple therapy have been the main first-line and second-line therapy for H. pylori in Korea. Although eradication rate of second-line quadruple therapy remains similar to that of the past, the success rate of eradication with triple therapy has decreased with increasing antimicrobial resistance to H. pylori. There is no standard third-line therapy, and some regimens that incorporate levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, and rifabutin can be used. New regimens such as sequential or concomitant therapy are suggested as alternative treatment for H. pylori. We need more well designed randomized controlled studies to choose proper treatment for H. pylori infection.     

＂Rescue＂ regimens after Helicobacter pylori treatment failure

Helicobacter pylori （H pylori） infection is the main cause of gastritis, gastroduodenal ulcer disease, and gastric cancer. After more than 20 years of experience in H pylori treatment, in my opinion, the ideal regimen to treat this infection is still to be found. Currently, apart from having to know first-line eradication regimens well, we must also be prepared to face treatment failures. Therefore, in designing a treatment strategy we should not focus on the results of primary therapy alone, but also on the final （overall） eradication rate. The choice of a ＂rescue＂ treatment depends on which treatment is used initially. If a clarithromycinbased regimen was used initially, a subsequent metronidazole-based treatment （quadruple therapy） may be used afterwards, and then a levofloxacinbased combination would be a third ＂rescue＂ option. Alternatively, it has recently been suggested that levofloxacin-based rescue therapy constitutes an encouraging second-line strategy, representing an alternative to quadruple therapy in patients with previous PPI-clarithromycin-amoxicillin failure, with the advantage of efficacy, simplicity and safety. In this case, a quadruple regimen may be reserved as a third-line rescue option. Finally, rifabutin-based rescue therapy constitutes an encouraging empirical fourthline strategy after multiple previous eradication failures with key antibiotics such as amoxicillin, clarithromycin, metronidazole, tetracycline, and levofloxacin. Even after two consecutive failures, several studies have demonstrated that H pylori eradication can finally be achieved in almost all patients if several rescue therapies are consecutively given. Therefore, the attitude in H pylori eradication therapy failure, even after two or more unsuccessful attempts, should be to fight and not to surrender.     

Efficacy of rifabutin-based triple therapy in Helicobacter pylori infected patients after two standard treatments

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Even with the current most effective treatment regimens for Helicobacter pylori infection, a considerable number of patients will be resistant to eradication. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the H. pylori eradication rate in patients resistant to standard therapies when treated with a triple therapy of pantoprazole, rifabutin and amoxicillin. METHODS: Ninety-two consecutive patients diagnosed with H. pylori infection resistant to two previous treatment regimens were treated with pantoprazole, rifabutin and amoxicillin for 10 days. The persistence or eradication of H. pylori was determined by a 13C-urea breath test performed 4 weeks after the treatment. RESULTS: Per protocol eradication was achieved in 62.2% of patients and the intention-to-treat eradication was 60.8%. Only two patients were excluded for adverse events related to the treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The eradication rate is acceptable as a third-line therapy, particularly in centers with high cure rate for first line therapy. Another important value of this study is the good tolerance for the treatment observed in our patients. It is possible that rifabutin-based triple therapy may be of use in hospital centers that do not have disposable culture and susceptibility methods against H. pylori.     

Cure of Helicobacter pylori-associated ulcer disease through eradication.

The eradication of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection has led to a dramatic benefit for patients with gastroduodenal ulcer disease, as the majority of these patients receive a lifelong cure. Relapses after successful H. pylori cure may be caused by either recrudescence or reinfection, both rare events nowadays, or be attributed to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or aspirin intake. In certain geographical areas, H. pylori-negative relapses are proposed as a new, pathophysiological and not yet elucidated entity. The cure of H. pylori infection in uncomplicated duodenal ulcer diseases consists of 7 days of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) based triple therapy, containing two antibiotics from clarithromycin, amoxicillin and metronidazole. In gastric ulcer, it is recommended that the PPI is continued for a further 3 weeks as these ulcers have a prolonged healing time. Rescue therapies after failure need to take into consideration the resistance pattern of the micro-organism and are offered in the form of quadruple therapy or a high-dose PPI with amoxicillin.     

以泮托拉唑为基础的三联和四联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌疗效比较——一项单中心、随机、开放、平行对照研究

背景：近年质子泵抑制剂（PPI）＋阿莫西林＋克拉霉素标准三联疗法对幽门螺杆菌（H.pylori）的根除率有所降低,PPI＋铋剂＋甲硝唑＋四环素的四联疗法能否成为一线治疗的首选以及适当延长疗程能否提高根除率尚有待明确。目的：比较以泮托拉唑为基础的7d标准三联疗法与7d、10d四联疗法根除H.pylori的疗效。方法：133例非溃疡性消化不良的H.pylori感染患者随机分配至7d三联组（45例,泮托拉唑40mgbid＋阿莫西林1.0gbid＋克拉霉素500mgbid,PAC方案）以及7d、10d四联组（43例和45例,泮托拉唑40mgbid＋枸橼酸铋钾220mgbid＋甲硝唑400mgtid＋四环素750mgbid,PBMT方案）。治疗结束后至少间隔4周行13C-尿素呼气试验复查H.pylori,评估治疗结果。结果：共129例患者按方案完成治疗。三组H.pylori根除率按意图治疗（ITT）分析分别为73.3%、79.1%和88.9%,按方案（PP）分析分别为75.0%、82.9%和90.9%。7dPAC方案的PP根除率显著低于10dPBMT方案（P〈0.05）。除四联组中有2例患者分别因头晕和腹泻而未完成治疗外,其余患者的不良反应相似且均能耐受。结论：在7d标准三联疗法H.pylori根除疗效降低的情况下,含泮托拉唑、铋剂、甲硝唑和四环素的10d四联疗法可考虑作为根除治疗的首选方案。     

幽门螺杆菌感染与上胃肠道疾病

1982年Marshall和Mareen首次从慢性活动性胃炎患者的胃粘膜中分离出为幽门螺杆菌(Hp)。本文概括了Hp与上胃肠道疾病的关系，并评估其感染的治疗。现已确认Hp与4种上胃肠道疾病密切相关：(1)慢性胃炎；(2)消化性溃疡病；(3)胃癌；(4)胃粘膜相关淋巴样组织(MALT)淋巴瘤。Hp是慢性胃炎的主要病因，与消化性溃疡病的发生密切相关，Hp感染增加了胃腺癌发生的危险性，而且也涉及到胃MALT淋巴瘤发生的致病机理。Hp感染的治疗是以PPI、铋制剂以及RBC为基础的三联疗法，当三联疗法失败时则推荐四联疗法。四联疗法是传统的三联疗法(铋剂为基础的三联疗法)十PPI组成。     

American College of Gastroenterology guideline on the management of Helicobacter pylori infection

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) remains a prevalent, worldwide, chronic infection. Though the prevalence of this infection appears to be decreasing in many parts of the world, H. pylori remains an important factor linked to the development of peptic ulcer disease, gastric malignanc and dyspeptic symptoms. Whether to test for H. pylori in patients with functional dyspepsia, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), patients taking nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, with iron deficiency anemia, or who are at greater risk of developing gastric cancer remains controversial. H. pylori can be diagnosed by endoscopic or nonendoscopic methods. A variety of factors including the need for endoscopy, pretest probability of infection, local availability, and an understanding of the performance characteristics and cost of the individual tests influences choice of evaluation in a given patient. Testing to prove eradication should be performed in patients who receive treatment of H. pylori for peptic ulcer disease, individuals with persistent dyspeptic symptoms despite the test-and-treat strategy, those with H. pylori-associated MALT lymphoma, and individuals who have undergone resection of early gastric cancer. Recent studies suggest that eradication rates achieved by first-line treatment with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI), clarithromycin, and amoxicillin have decreased to 70-85%, in part due to increasing clarithromycin resistance. Eradication rates may also be lower with 7 versus 14-day regimens. Bismuth-containing quadruple regimens for 7-14 days are another first-line treatment option. Sequential therapy for 10 days has shown promise in Europe but requires validation in North America. The most commonly used salvage regimen in patients with persistent H. pylori is bismuth quadruple therapy. Recent data suggest that a PPI, levofloxacin, and amoxicillin for 10 days is more effective and better tolerated than bismuth quadruple therapy for persistent H. pylori infection, though this needs to be validated in the United States.     

Helicobacter pylori diagnosis and management

H pylori is a global human pathogen and is the major cause of gastritis and the gastritis-associated diseases: gastric ulcer, duodenal ulcer, gastric cancer, and primary gastric B-cell lymphoma (MALToma). Although several reliable diagnostic tests are widely available, the ideal regimen for treating the infection re-mains to be established. The current first-line or legacy triple therapy regimens fail in 20% to 40% of patients. Causes of treatment failure include antibiotic resistance, poor compliance, short (7-10 days) duration of therapy, and drug-related side effects. Fourteen-day triple therapy has an approximately 12% better cure rate than does 7-day therapy; therefore, shorter durations can no longer be recommended. Recent studies confirmed older observations that the success rate of legacy triple regimens (PPI plus two antibiotics) can be improved if the duration is extended to 14 days or if a third antibiotic is given. Sequential therapy (PPI plus amoxicillin followed by a PPI plus clarithromycin plus metronidazole) requires further evaluation although the concept appears very promising and therapy should probably replace the legacy triple therapies. More studies are needed to examine doses, durations, and the need for sequential administration of the drugs, which extends the duration to 14 days. Nonetheless, sequential quadruple therapy probably should replace the legacy triple therapies. Classic quadruple therapy contains bismuth, a PPI, 1500 mg of metronidazole, and 1500 mg of tetracycline. It provides the highest average eradication rates and in many regions should be considered as the initial approach. Confirmation of eradication using noninvasive diagnostic tests, such as a urea breath test or stool antigen assay, is now the standard of care. The diagnosis of latent or symptomatic H pylori like the diagnosis of latent or symptomatic syphilis, always should prompt treatment. Because of decreasing cure rates, new and improved therapies are needed.     

门诊幽门螺杆菌感染者治疗分析

背景：在幽门螺杆菌（Hp）感染的根除治疗中,患者的执行是治疗链的最终端和关键环节,但在临床实践中常常被忽视。目的：从门诊患者角度了解Hp感染根除治疗中存在的问题,以促进治疗的进一步规范化。方法：对2012年12月1日～2013年4月1日在新疆医科大学第一附属医院消化科门诊就诊的Hp感染者进行调查,调查内容包括治疗原因、根除治疗药物、疗程、复查时间和复查结果。结果：共139例次门诊Hp感染者纳入研究,治疗原因主要是慢性胃炎,占61．9％。根除治疗方案主要采用第三次全国共识推荐的PPI＋两种抗菌药物三联疗法,以PPI＋阿莫西林＋克拉霉素标准三联疗法为主,占46．8％;采用第四次全国共识推荐的铋剂＋PPI＋两种抗菌药物四联疗法者仅占18．7％;采用不规范方案者占9．4％。43．2％的患者疗程为第四次全国共识规定的10～14d,69．1％的患者于停药≥4周后复查。结论：在执行Hp感染的根除治疗时,临床医师应及时进行知识更新,掌握最新共识推荐的根除治疗方案,并注意对患者进行治疗方案的解释和交待。     

Trial of moxifloxacin-containing triple therapy after initial and second-line treatment failures for Helicobacter pylori infection]

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Proton-pump inhibitor (PPI)-based triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication is widely used with considerable failure rate. Bismuth-based, second-line therapy is also associated with failures in more than 20% of cases in Korea. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of third-line therapy containing moxifloxacin as a rescue in Korea. METHODS: The subjects consisted of 201 patients infected with H. pylori, who were treated with PPI-based therapy, 42 patients treated with bismuth-based after failure of initial PPI triple therapy, and 10 patients treated with moxifloxacin-containing triple therapy after failure of successive initial and second-line therapy. Eradication rate, compliance and side effect rates were compared. RESULTS: The eradication rates of initial, second-line, and third-line therapy were as follows: 67.2%/83.3%, 54.8%/76.7%, 80.0%/88.9% by intention-to-treat and per protocol analysis, respectively. The compliance of patients for each treatment was 98.2%, 90.9%, 100%, respectively. The side effect rate was significantly higher in the bismuth triple therapy than in the PPI- or moxifloxacin-containing triple therapy (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Moxifloxacin-containing triple therapy shows high eradication rate with fewer side effects and good compliance. Thus, this regimen could be used as a rescue therapy.     

3种幽门螺杆菌根除方案和抗生素耐药对其根除率的影响

背景:目前推荐的根除幽门螺杆菌(H.pylori)的治疗方案因H.pylori对大环内酯类和硝基咪唑类抗生素的耐药性快速增加而不能令人满意。目的:评估以质子泵抑制剂(PPI)为基础或以H2受体拮抗剂(H2RA)加铋剂为基础的三联或四联疗法根除H.pylori的疗效和安全性,评估H.pylori的耐药性及其对根除率的影响。方法:120例H.pylori感染的愈合期十二指肠球部溃疡或非溃疡性消化不良患者随机分入3个治疗组,疗程7天。A组:奥美拉唑、克拉霉素和替硝唑;B组:法莫替丁、枸橼酸铋钾、克拉霉素和替硝唑;C组:法莫替丁、枸橼酸铋钾、呋喃唑酮和四环素。根除治疗前取胃窦黏膜活检组织行快速尿素酶试验、H.pylori培养和组织学检查评估H.pylori感染状态。治疗结束后4～6周,采用13C-尿素呼气试验评估H.pylori根除情况。琼脂扩散法药物敏感试验测定抗生素的最小抑菌浓度(MIC)。结果:所有患者均完成治疗和随访。A组、B组和C组的H.pylori根除率分别为80%(32/40)、85％(34/40)和90％(36/40),3组间无显著差异(P>0.05)。耐药菌株与敏感菌株的H.pylori根除率有显著差异。结论:以PPI为基础或以H2RA加铋剂为基础的三联或四联疗法对H.pylori具有较高的根除率。H.py-lori的耐药性是影响根除率的主要因素。     

幽门螺杆菌根除治疗失败后的补救治疗

幽门螺杆菌（H.pylori)对抗生素的耐药率上升是导致根除治疗失败率上升的主要原因，对经标准方案根除H.pylori失败的患者有必要进行补救治疗。目的：评估铋剂、质子泵抑制剂（PPI）联用呋喃唑酮和四环素组成的7天四联方案用于根除H.pylori治疗失败后补救治疗的疗效，以及H.pylori耐药对疗效的影响。方法：予35例经含克拉霉素根除H.pylori方案治疗、H.pylori仍为阳性的患者以为期7天的四联治疗：枸橼酸铋钾220mg bid 奥美拉唑20mg bid 呋喃唑酮100mg bid 四环素750mg bid。治疗前取胃窦黏膜活检标本进行快速尿素酶试验、组织学检查和培养检测H.pylori。用琼脂扩散法测定克拉霉素、呋喃唑酮和四环素的最低抑菌浓度（MIC）。治疗结束后至少4周，采用^13C-尿素呼气试验进行H.pylori感染状态评估。结果：33例患者完成治疗和随访，2例失访。根据意图治疗（ITT）和试验方案（PP）分析，该补救方案的H.pylori根除率分别为68．6％（24／35）和72．7％（24／33）。10例（28．6％）患者发生轻度副反应（9例发生恶心、中上腹不适，1例发生皮疹）。35例中有27例H.pylori培养成功，克拉霉素的耐药率为51．8％（14／27），呋喃唑酮为3．7％（1／27），四环素为7．4％（2／27）。各药物耐药菌株和敏感菌株的H.pylori根除率无显著差异。结论：铋剂、PPI联用呋喃唑酮和四环素组成的7天联方案作为根除H.pylori治疗失败后的补救治疗可获得较高的H.pylori根除率。     

The efficacy of levofloxacin based triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication]

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The failure rates of first and second line therapies of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication range from 15 to 20%. This study was aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of levofloxacin based triple therapy compared with standard triple or quadruple therapy for H. pylori eradication in Korea. METHODS: We enrolled two hundred and sixty seven patients with presence of H. pylori infection. One hundred and forty-one patients were treated with levofloxacin based triple therapy (LAP; levofloxacin, amoxicillin, proton pump inhibitor; PPI), and 126 patients were treated with standard triple therapy (CAP; clarithromycin, amoxicillin, PPI). We retreated the patients who had failed in H. pylori eradication with standard quadruple second-line therapy (MTPB; metronidazole, tetracycline, PPI, bismuth subcitrate) or levofloxacin based therapy (LAP or LCP; levofloxacin, clarithromycin, PPI). RESULTS: In first line therapy of H. pylori eradication, the eradication rates of levofloxacin based triple therapy and standard triple therapy were 69.8% and 74.0% respectively (p=0.52). In second-line therapy, the eradication rate of levofloxacin based triple therapy and standard quadruple therapy were 62.5% and 40.0% respectively (p=0.34). CONCLUSIONS: Levofloxacin based triple therapy is effective as standard regimen to eradicate H. pylori infection and is useful for an alternative rescue therapy as well.