The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios

BACKGROUND: Prosthetic impingement due to poor positioning can limit the range of motion of the hip after total hip arthroplasty. In this study, a computer model was used to determine the effects of the positions of the acetabular and femoral components and of varying head-neck ratios on impingement and range of motion. METHODS: A three-dimensional generic hip prosthesis with a hemispherical cup, a neck diameter of 12.25 millimeters, and a head size ranging from twenty-two to thirty-two millimeters was simulated on a computer. The maximum range of motion of the hip was measured, before the neck impinged on the liner of the cup, for acetabular abduction angles ranging from 35 to 55 degrees and acetabular and femoral anteversion ranging from 0 to 30 degrees. Stability of the hip was estimated as the maximum possible flexion coupled with 10 degrees of adduction and 10 degrees of internal rotation and also as the maximum possible extension coupled with 10 degrees of external rotation. The effects of prosthetic orientation on activities of daily living were analyzed as well. RESULTS: Acetabular abduction angles of less than 45 degrees decreased flexion and abduction of the hip, whereas higher angles decreased adduction and rotation. Femoral and acetabular anteversion increased flexion but decreased extension. Acetabular abduction angles of between 45 and 55 degrees permitted a better overall range of motion and stability when combined with appropriate acetabular and femoral anteversion. Lower head-neck ratios decreased the range of motion that was possible without prosthetic impingement. The addition of a modular sleeve that increased the diameter of the femoral neck by two millimeters decreased the range of motion by 1.5 to 8.5 degrees, depending on the direction of motion that was studied. CONCLUSIONS: There is a complex interplay between the angles of orientation of the femoral and acetabular components. Acetabular abduction angles between 45 and 55 degrees, when combined with appropriate acetabular and femoral anteversion, resulted in a maximum overall range of motion and stability with respect to prosthetic impingement. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: During total hip arthroplasty, acetabular abduction is often constrained by available bone coverage, while femoral anteversion may be dictated by the geometry of the femoral shaft. For each combination of acetabular abduction and femoral anteversion, there is an optimum range of acetabular anteversion that allows the potential for a maximum range of motion without prosthetic impingement after total hip arthroplasty. These data can be used intraoperatively to determine optimum position.     

Impingement with total hip replacement

Impingement is a cause of poor outcomes of prosthetic hip arthroplasty; it can lead to instability, accelerated wear, and unexplained pain. Impingement is influenced by prosthetic design, component position, biomechanical factors, and patient variables. Evidence linking impingement to dislocation and accelerated wear comes from implant retrieval studies. Operative principles that maximize an impingement-free range of motion include correct combined acetabular and femoral anteversion and an optimal head-neck ratio. Operative techniques for preventing impingement include medialization of the cup to avoid component impingement and restoration of hip offset and length to avoid osseous impingement.     

Bony impingement affects range of motion after total hip arthroplasty: A subject‐specific approach

Hip range of motion after total hip arthroplasty has been shown to be dependent on prosthetic design and component placement. We hypothesized that bony anatomy would significantly affect range of motion. Computer models of a current generation hip arthroplasty design were virtually implanted in a model of pelvis and femur in various orientations ranging from 35° to 55° cup abduction, 0° to 30° cup anteversion, and 0° to 30° femoral anteversion. Four head sizes ranging from 22.2 to 32 mm and two neck sizes ranging from 10‐mm and 12‐mm diameter were tested. Range of motion was recorded as maximum flexion–extension, abduction–adduction, and axial rotation of the femur before any contact between prosthetic components or bone was detected. Bony impingement preceded component impingement in about 44% of all conditions tested, ranging from 66% in adduction to 22% in extension. Range of motion increased as head size increased. However, increasing head size also increased the propensity for bony impingement, which tended to reduce the beneficial effect of increased head size on range of motion. Reducing neck diameter had a greater effect on prosthetic impingement (mean, 3.5° increase in range of motion) compared to bone impingement (mean, 1.9°). This model allowed for a clinically relevant assessment of range of motion after total hip arthroplasty and may also be used with patient‐specific geometry [such as that obtained from preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans] for more accurate preoperative planning. © 2007 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 26:443–452, 2008     

Guidelines for Implant Placement to Minimize Impingement During Activities of Daily Living After Total Hip Arthroplasty

Impingement, both prosthetic and bony, precedes the vast majority of dislocations after total hip arthroplasty and may adversely impact component wear. Reconstructed computer hip models of 8 subjects were used to evaluate hip range of motion for activities of daily living (ADLs) associated with posterior instability and anterior instability. Variables examined included acetabular position, femoral offset, and head size. The majority of flexion ADLs (associated with posterior instability) encountered prosthetic impingement, whereas extension ADLs demonstrated bony impingement with the 45/20 cup placement position. Cup placement in natural anteversion and adduction allowed normal joint motion in anterior and posterior impinging activities. Insufficient femoral offset and smaller head size negatively impacted range of motion. Any anterior cup and posterior cup protrusions greater than 5 mm should be avoided.     

Range of motion and stability in total hip arthroplasty with 28-, 32-, 38-, and 44-mm femoral head sizes

The purpose of this study was to evaluate, via experimental models, the effect of larger head sizes for total hip arthroplasty on the type of impingement, range of motion (ROM), and joint stability. Testing was conducted using an anatomic full-size hip model (anatomic goniometer) and a novel anatomic dislocation simulator with 28-, 32-, 38-, and 44-mm diameter femoral heads within a 61-mm acetabular shell. Femoral heads >32-mm provided greater ROM and virtually complete elimination of component-to-component impingement. A significant increase in both flexion before dislocation and displacement between the femoral head and acetabulum to produce dislocation occurred with femoral heads >32-mm in diameter. These data indicate that larger femoral heads offer potential in providing greater hip ROM and joint stability.     

Biomechanics of large femoral heads: what they do and don't do

The stability and durability of total hip reconstruction is dependent on many factors that include the design and anatomic orientation of prosthetic components. An analysis of femoral component head size and acetabular component orientation shows an interdependency of these variables and joint stability. Increased femoral component head size can increase hip stability by increasing the prosthetic impingement-free range of hip motion and by increasing the inferior head displacement required before hip dislocation. Increasing the femoral head size from 22 mm to 40 mm increases the required displacement for dislocation by about 5 mm with the acetabular component at 45 degrees of abduction; however, increasing acetabular component abduction greatly diminishes this stability advantage of larger femoral heads. Vertical acetabular component orientation and femoral component head subluxation are each predicted to more than double the tensile stress with acetabular component polyethylene compared with components at 45 degrees of abduction. With a desirable acetabular component orientation, the use of larger femoral heads may result in improved joint stability and durable use of polyethylene. With high abduction acetabular component orientation, the use of larger femoral heads contributes little to joint stability and contributes to elevated stress within the polyethylene that may result in implant failure.     

Limited range of motion of hip resurfacing arthroplasty due to unfavorable ratio of prosthetic head size and femoral neck diameter

Background and purpose?Hip resurfacing arthroplasty is being used more and more frequently. The small ratio in size between the resurfaced femoral head and the relatively thick femoral neck raises the question of whether the range of motion is sufficient, particularly with regard to the high mobility required by younger patients. We analyzed motion in a CAD model.

Methods?Three-dimensional CAD models of the natural hip were created from CT scans and 8 designs of hip resurfacing prostheses (head diameter between 42 mm and 54 mm combined with a hemispherical cup) were implanted in a virtual sense. We simulated 3 different leg positions and the range of motion was evaluated, considering five different implant positions.

Results?The range of motion of the hip resurfacing designs analyzed was far below the range of motion of stemmed total hip prostheses. None of the resurfacing prostheses provided flexion movements of 90° without impingement. The average range of motion of hip resurfacing arthroplasty was 31–48° below the range of motion of a stemmed total hip replacement with 32-mm head diameter.

Interpretation?The range of motion of the hip resurfacing designs examined was substantially less than that of a conventional total hip prosthesis. Since impingement of the femoral neck on the acetabular component increases the risk of neck fractures, of dislocation and of subsequent implant loosening, the design and position of the implant should be considered before using hip resurfacing arthroplasty as a standard treatment for younger patients.     

A bench-top method for evaluating modular total hip component combinations

A modular total hip prosthesis allows the surgeon to vary head size, neck length, and acetabular coverage. Different combinations, however, may increase the risk of impingement of the prosthesis neck on the acetabular liner, leading to dislocation. We developed a bench-top model to test different modular component combinations to determine how far the femoral component could travel within the acetabular liner before impingement led to dislocation. We tested two hip systems, each from a different manufacturer. Certain components increased the risk of impingement and dislocation: skirted necks, smaller heads, and lipped liners. While the contribution of each component was small, the risk was additive, so that the combination of a small head with a skirted neck in a lipped liner actually reduced the available range of motion by 18 degrees, from 146 degrees to 128 degrees, in the first system, and by 13 degrees, from 156 degrees to 143 degrees in the other. This method could be adapted to test a wide range of component configurations, from a number of manufacturers. These findings may be useful in avoiding potentially unstable configurations when given a choice of modular components.     

Computer-based motion simulation of total hip prostheses with ceramic-on-ceramic wear couple. Analysis of implant design andorientation as influence parameters

OBJECTIVE: In THA, ceramic-on-ceramic wear couples are increasingly used. A restricted range of motion (ROM) due to unfavourable implant design or positioning may cause impingement or dislocation, which can result in failure of ceramic inserts. METHODS: By means of a 3-D CAD program different hip joint movements were simulated and the effects of ceramic hip implant design and position on the range of motion were analysed. RESULTS: To offer sufficient ROM and to minimise risk of impingement and dislocation, inclination angle of the acetabular cup should be 45 degrees, cup anteversion 15 degrees and stem antetorsion 0 degrees to 10 degrees. In regard to implant design, acetabular cups with slightly- recessed ceramic inserts should be used. Prosthetic systems with an elevated liner or with a mushroom-shaped femoral head are associated with limited ROM and increased risk of mechanical failure. The ratio of head to neck diameter should never be less than 2 : 1. Larger heads not only increase ROM, but also the stability of the prosthesis against dislocation. Thereby, the wear rate of ceramic-on-ceramic couples is not increased, in contrast to polyethylene. CONCLUSION: Considering certain criteria for ceramic hip implants regarding implant positioning, design and handling, ceramic-on-ceramic couples can be used with low risk of revision surgery and they can also reduce the prosthesis loosening associated with wear in young and active patients.     

Reducing the distal profile of dual mobility liners can mitigate soft‐tissue impingement and liner entrapment without affecting mechanical performance

Soft‐tissue impingement with dual mobility liners can cause anterior hip pain and intra‐prosthetic dislocation. The hypothesis of this study was that reducing liner profile below the equator (contoured design) can mitigate soft‐tissue impingement without compromising inner‐head pull‐out resistance and hip joint stability. The interaction of conventional and contoured liners with anterior soft tissues was evaluated in cadaver specimens via visual observation and fluoroscopic imaging. Resistance to inner‐head pull‐out was evaluated via finite element analyses, and hip joint stability was evaluated by rigid‐body mechanics simulation of dislocation in two modes (A, B). Cadaveric experiments showed that distal portion of conventional liners impinge on anterior hip capsule and cause iliopsoas tenting at low flexion angles (≤30°). During hip extension, the rotation imparted to the liner from posterior engagement with femoral neck was impeded by anterior soft‐tissue impingement. The iliopsoas tenting was significantly reduced with contoured liners (p ≤ 0.04). Additionally, the contoured and conventional liners had identical inner‐head pull‐out resistance (901 N vs. 909 N), jump distance (9.4 mm mode‐A, 11.7 mm mode‐B) and impingement‐free range of motion (47° mode‐A, 29° mode‐B). Thus, soft‐tissue impingement with conventional dual mobility liners may be mitigated by reducing liner profile below the equator, without affecting mechanical performance. © 2015 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 34:889–897, 2016.     

The influence of head and neck geometry on stability of total hip replacement: a mechanical test study

BACKGROUND: Dislocation after replacement may be caused by poor implant design or positioning, or by the surgical approach taken. We evaluated the influence of head and neck design on range of motion and stability (with respect to risk of dislocation) in total hip endoprostheses. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Using a test device, we determined the stability afforded by different head sizes and neck geometries for various implant positions. RESULTS: Increasing head diameter led to an enhancement of range of motion as well as resistance against subluxation, and thus to improved stability in any movement combination and implant orientation. Smaller femoral heads were associated with increased risk of dislocation, especially in a poor implant position such as retroversion, and steep positioning of the cup. Skirted metal or mushroom-shaped ceramic heads had a reduced range of motion until impingement of approx. 20 degrees, as compared to spherical standard heads. Furthermore, after identical joint loading, skirted heads dislocated more readily than standard heads with corresponding diameters. INTERPRETATION: To obtain sufficient joint mobility and stability, neck geometry and implant position should be considered when choosing the femoral head size.     

Effects of the femoral offset and the head size on the safe range of motion in total hip arthroplasty

The purpose of this study was to quantify the effects of femoral offset and head size on range of motion (ROM) after total hip arthroplasty. Modular prostheses were implanted into 11 cadaveric hips using a posterolateral approach and tested for ROM with 3 different offsets and 5 different femoral head sizes. Increasing the femoral offset to 4 and 8 mm resulted in 21.1 degrees and 26.7 degrees of improved flexion, and 13.7 degrees and 21.2 degrees of improved internal rotation, respectively. The ROM improved in a head size-dependent manner primarily because of increasing the jumping distance of the femoral head rather than delaying any impingement. In contrast, the effectiveness of femoral offset was driven by delayed osseous impingement.     

Mid-term results of large diameter heads on cross-linked polyethylene liners in total hip replacement

BackgroundHighly cross-linked polyethylene liners in total hip replacement (THR) have allowed the use of larger diameter femoral heads. Larger heads allow for increased range of motion, decreased implant impingement, and protection against dislocation. The purpose of this study is to assess the clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients with large femoral heads THR at 4 years postop.Materials and methodsStudy includes 28 patients who had a primary THR with a 36 mm larger femoral head were retrospectively for minimum 4 years follow-up. All patients received a cementless acetabular shell and a highly cross-linked polyethylene liner with an inner diameter of 36 mm. The median radiographic follow-up was 4 years (range 2.0–6.0), and patients were assessed clinically by Harris hip score.ResultsThe mean follow-up is minimum 4 years (range 2–6 years) results in all operated patients showed marked improvement in Harris hip score from preoperative mean 49.1 to 89.9 at 4 years or more follow-up. The complications include superficial infection (n = 2). No dislocation, or no osteolysis was seen in the pelvis or proximal femur, and no components failed due to aseptic loosening. There was no evidence of cup migration, screw breakage, or eccentric wear on the liner.ConclusionThe mid-term results in this series of patients with LDH using 36 mm femoral head articulating with highly cross linked polyethylene showed excellent clinical, and radiological results, in terms of, joint restoration that replicates the natural anatomy, optimized range of motion without impingement & reduced opportunity for postoperative dislocation.     

Relative neck lengthening and intracapital osteotomy for severe Perthes and Perthes-like deformities

Intra-articular and extra-articular femoral Perthes deformities, or either, can result in severe alterations of the proximal femur and secondarily even involve the acetabulum, which can lead to premature osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip. In affected hips, joint damage due to impingement and instability may coexist. Classically, extra-articular impingement and associated abductor insufficiency in Perthes disease or similar pathologies are treated by trochanteric advancement. However, this leaves intra-articular impingement and instability unaddressed. The technique of surgical dislocation of the hip, in combination with a retinacular fap, allows for the relative lengthening of the femoral neck and even femoral head reduction osteotomy in such cases. This can be combined with an acetabular procedure to treat the secondary dysplasia. Since 2001, 14 patients with a minimum follow-up of 3 years have been treated by this technique without complications, such as femoral head osteonecrosis or trochanteric failures. All patients had markedly improved pain levels, hip mobility, and gait.     

Ideal Femoral Head Size in Total Hip Arthroplasty Balances Stability and Volumetric Wear

Background

Over the last several years, a trend towards increasing femoral head size in total hip arthroplasty to improve stability and impingement free range of motion has been observed.

Purpose

The specific questions we sought to answer in our review were: (1) What are the potential advantages and disadvantages of metal-on-metal, ceramic-on-ceramic, and metal-on-polyethylene bearings? (2) What is effect that femoral head size has on joint kinematics? (3) What is the effect that large femoral heads have on bearing surface wear?

Methods

A PubMed search and a review of 2012 Orthopaedic Research Society abstracts was performed and articles were chosen that directly answered components of the specific aims and that reported outcomes with contemporary implant designs or materials.

Results

A review of the literature suggests that increasing femoral head size decreases the risk of postoperative dislocation and improves impingement free range of motion; however, volumetric wear increases with large femoral heads on polyethylene and increases corrosion of the stem in large metal-on-metal modular total hip arthroplasty (THA); however, the risk of potentially developing osteolysis or adverse reactions to metal debris respectively is still unknown. Further, the effect of large femoral heads with ceramic-on-ceramic THA is unclear, due to limited availability and published data.

Conclusions

Surgeons must balance the benefits of larger head size with the increased risk of volumetric wear when determining the appropriate head size for a given patient.     

股骨颈组配式假体在全髋关节置换术后偏心距重建中的作用

目的 探讨股骨颈组配式假体对全髋关节置换术后偏心距重建的意义.方法 对2009年6月至2012年6月使用股骨颈组配式假体行全髋关节置换术的75例患者进行回顾性研究,男42例,女33例;年龄44～83岁,平均(64.7±12)岁.左髋40例,右髋35例.术前Harris髋关节功能评分32～65分,平均(54±6)分.均采用M/L Taper with Kinectiv假体系统.术前应用模板技术预计假体大小及偏心距,术中实体测量,结合术前计划和术中情况选取大小合适的股骨颈假体,恢复偏心距,重建髋关节外展力臂.术后于X线片上测量偏心距及下肢长度.术后l、3、6、12个月及以后每年随访一次,采用Harris髋关节功能评分评价疗效.结果 股骨偏心距均得到重建,误差从-3.0～3.0 mm,平均(1.3±0.3)mm.双下肢长度差平均(3.0±0.8) mm.术后随访6～36个月,平均19.7个月.术后12周站立位髋关节外展角平均40°±10°;Harris髋关节功能评分65～94分,平均(86±13)分,与术前比较差异有统计学意义(t=19.360,P=0.000).末次随访时Harris髋关节功能评分78～98分,平均(95±15)分.随访期间未出现关节脱位和髋臼股骨撞击征病例.结论 使用股骨颈组配式假体可在不影响下肢长度的情况下恢复患肢的股骨偏心距,获得良好的髋关节外展肌力、活动度及稳定性,术后近期并发症发生率低.     

Anterior femoroacetabular impingement after femoral neck fractures

OBJECTIVES: To verify whether anterior femoroacetabular impingement can be a reason for hip pain and loss of motion in patients with a healed femoral neck fracture. DESIGN: Retrospective clinical, radiologic, and surgical evaluation. SETTING: Third referral hospital. PATIENTS: Nine patients who previously sustained a femoral neck fracture were treated between 1995 and 1999 for hip pain and loss of motion. All these mostly young patients (mean age 33.3 years) complained of groin pain. During the physical examination, acute pain could be elicited by passively forcing the femoral neck against the acetabular rim in flexion, adduction, and internal rotation, motions that were all limited. METHODS: Conventional radiographs and, if possible, arthrographic magnetic resonance imaging scans were followed by a surgical subluxation or dislocation of the femoral head to analyze the sequelae of anterior femoroacetabular impingement. Treatment was based on improvement of the anterior offset (the difference between the anterior contour of the head and the femoral neck) or intertrochanteric osteotomy to ameliorate clearance of the joint. RESULTS: Intraoperatively in eight patients (one not operated), impingement was found to result from insufficient reduction of the fracture, already visible on the conventional radiographs. Retrotorsion (mean 20 degrees) of the head caused anterior impingement in all patients, additional varus position (mean caput collum diaphysis angle 115 degrees) of the head caused anterolateral impingement in two patients. In all patients, anterior labral and adjacent acetabular cartilage lesions were found during surgical subluxation or dislocation of the femoral head, comparable to those seen on the magnetic resonance imaging scan. They proved to result from repetitive abutment and compression between the head-neck junction and the acetabulum. CONCLUSION: Femoroacetabular impingement can be a cause for hip pain and loss of motion in patients who previously sustained a femoral neck fracture. The condition causes degenerative anterior labral and adjacent acetabular cartilage lesions. Early treatment is essential to prevent further degeneration and osteoarthrosis of the joint. Prevention is predicated by initial precise anatomic reduction of such fractures in all planes.     

Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: implant design and orientation

Implant design and positioning are important factors in maintaining stability and minimizing dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Although the advent of modular femoral stems and acetabular implants increased the number of head, neck, and liner designs, the features of recent designs can cause intra-articular prosthetic impingement within the arc of motion required for normal daily activities and thus lead to limited motion, increased wear, osteolysis, and subluxation or dislocation. Minimizing impingement involves avoiding skirted heads, matching a 22-mm head with an appropriate acetabular implant, maximizing the head-to-neck ratio, and, when possible, using a chamfered acetabular liner and a trapezoidal, rather than circular, neck cross-section. Computer modeling studies indicate the optimal cup position is 45 degrees to 55 degrees abduction. Angles <55 degrees require anteversion of 10 degrees to 20 degrees of both the stem and cup to minimize the risk of impingement and dislocation.     

Anatomically adapted endoprosthesis of the proximal end of the femur

The marrow-cavities of several human femora were cleaned and filled with plastics; the femoral component design was developed based on these moulds. Different sizes of the stem were obtained by scaling down the biggest mould in steps of 10%. The stem has an oval cross-section and is twisted similar to the form of the marrow-cavity; therefore different designs for the left and right femur are necessary. As the marrow-cavity of the femur tapers down to the middle of the shaft the length of the prosthetic stem cannot be selected arbitrarily. The stem must end above the narrowest site of the cavity. Data are presented. To avoid disadvantageous frictional stresses between the collar of the prosthesis and the plane of resection of the femoral neck both must be aligned perpendicular to the most common direction of the load of the hip joint. Therefore a step-like osteotomy of the femoral neck becomes necessary without disturbing the calcar femorale instead of an inclined osteotomy. A firm contact between the femoral wall and the collar, which forms an angle of 64 degrees with the axis of the femoral shaft, guarantees that only small frictional stresses occur between collar and femoral cortex if the load of the hip joint varies within the physiological range. A set of ceramic femoral heads with three different conical borings yield different lengths of the neck of the prosthesis. Independent of which femoral head and which size of prosthesis are chosen the direction of the maximum hip load in any case thrusts the contact area between collar and femoral wall. Thus dangerous tilting moments round the medial calcar femorale do not occur, the incidence of a fracture of the prosthesis shaft is therefore reduced. After implantation of the anatomically designed femoral component both remodeling and resorption of the calcar femorale are observed. This reaction is independent of the kind of fixation, i.e. if a smooth stem was fixed with cement or a stem with a porous, cancellous bone-like metallic surface was implanted without cement fixation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)