Randomized trial comparing neo-adjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy in operable locally advanced breast cancer (T4b N0-2 M0)

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) remains a major problem in developing countries. While trials utilizing neo-adjuvant chemotherapy demonstrate superior survival rates compared to historic controls, randomized studies evaluating the precise role of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in LABC are lacking. In the present trial, neo-adjuvant chemotherapy was compared against adjuvant chemotherapy to assess survival advantage in operable T4b N0-2 M0 breast cancer. METHODS: A total of 101 women with operable LABC (T4b N0-2 M0) were randomized. In arm A, 50 patients received 3 cycles of CEF chemotherapy before and 3 cycles following surgery. In arm B, 51 patients had primary surgery followed by 6 cycles of CEF chemotherapy. In both arms, loco-regional radiotherapy was given after completion of CEF. RESULTS: The response of primary tumor to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy was 66%, complete response (CR) 14% and partial response (PR) 52%. Clinical nodal response occurred in 95% of node positive patients. Only two (4%) patients had pathologic CR both in tumor and axilla. There was a significant (P = 0.02) increase in incidence of pathologically negative nodes in arm A. At a median follow up of 25 months, there was no significant difference in overall and disease free survival (DFS) in both arms (P = 0.42 and 0.18). Patients showing a response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy had better DFS (P = 0.04) compared to those who had no response. CONCLUSIONS: Early results of the study indicate no survival benefit with the inclusion of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in LABC (T4b N0-2 M0). Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy resulted in significant down staging; good responders had a better DFS compared to those who did not respond.     

局部晚期乳腺癌的治疗体会

目的：观察85例III期乳腺癌患者治疗的疗效,寻找提高疗效的策略。方法：2003年6月至2005年12月85例III期乳腺癌患者接受了外科手术治疗,根据是否接受新辅助化疗分为手术组（41例）和新辅助化疗组（44例）,比较两组的手术性质及治疗结果。结果：新辅助化疗组的无病生存期为59.1个月,明显高于手术组的43.1个月（P〈0.05）,新辅助化疗组的5年无病生存率为36.16%,手术组为34.14%（P〉0.05）。结论：局部晚期乳腺癌患者接受新辅助化疗后手术可提高无病生存时间,值得临床推广。     

Differences in survival among women with stage III inflammatory and noninflammatory locally advanced breast cancer appear early: a large population-based study

BACKGROUND:

Significant improvements in the survival of women with breast cancer have been observed and are attributed to a multidisciplinary approach and the introduction of polychemotherapy and endocrine regimens. The objective of this population‐based study was to determine whether women with inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) who received treatment in a modern era had a poorer survival compared those with non‐IBC locally advanced breast cancer (LABC).

METHODS:

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program registry was searched to identify women with stage IIIB/C breast cancer diagnosed between 2004 and 2007 who had undergone surgery and radiotherapy. Patients were categorized as either having IBC or non‐IBC LABC according the sixth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) criteria. Breast cancer‐specific survival (BCS) was estimated using the Kaplan‐Meier product limit method and compared across groups using the log‐rank statistic. Cox models were then fitted to compare the association between breast cancer type and BCS after adjusting for patient and tumor characteristics.

RESULTS:

A total of 828 (19.2%) women and 3476 (80.8%) women had stage IIIB/C IBC and non‐IBC LABC, respectively. The median follow‐up was 19 months. The 2‐year BCS rate was 90% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 88%‐91%) for the entire cohort and 84% (95%CI, 80%‐87%) and 91% (95%CI, 90%‐91%) among women with IBC and non‐IBC LABC, respectively. In the multivariable model, patients with IBC were found to have a 43% increased risk of death from breast cancer compared with patients with non‐IBC LABC (hazard ratio, 1.43; 95%CI, 1.10‐1.86 [P = .008]).

CONCLUSIONS:

In the era of multidisciplinary management and anthracycline‐based and taxane‐based polychemotherapy regimens, women with IBC continue to have worse survival outcomes compared with those with non‐IBC LABC. Cancer 2011. © 2010 American Cancer Society.     

局部晚期乳腺癌的治疗体会

目的:观察85例III期乳腺癌患者治疗的疗效,寻找提高疗效的策略。方法:2003年6月至2005年12月85例III期乳腺癌患者接受了外科手术治疗,根据是否接受新辅助化疗分为手术组(41例)和新辅助化疗组(44例),比较两组的手术性质及治疗结果。结果:新辅助化疗组的无病生存期为59.1个月,明显高于手术组的43.1个月(P<0.05),新辅助化疗组的5年无病生存率为36.16%,手术组为34.14%(P>0.05)。结论:局部晚期乳腺癌患者接受新辅助化疗后手术可提高无病生存时间,值得临床推广。     

Evaluation of total choline from in-vivo volume localized proton MR spectroscopy and its response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer

Results of the proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy carried out on normal, benign breast disease and locally advanced breast cancer patients are presented. The in-vivo MR spectra of malignant breast tissue of patients (n = 67) suffering from infiltrating ductal carcinoma are dominated by the water resonance, while the spectra of the unaffected contralateral breast tissue of these patients are mainly dominated by resonance arising from lipids which is similar to the spectra of normal breast tissue obtained from volunteers (controls, n = 16). In addition to the water and lipid peaks, in majority of the patients (approximately 80%) the water suppressed spectra showed a resonance at 3.2 ppm due to choline containing compounds (TCho) before treatment. In patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, absence/reduction in choline was observed in 89% of the patients. TCho was also observed in 2 of 14 benign lesions. The sensitivity and specificity of in-vivo MRS in detecting TCho in malignant tumours was 78% and 86%, respectively. Observation of TCho before treatment and its disappearance (or reduction) after treatment may be a useful indicator of response of locally advanced breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.     

局部晚期乳腺癌的治疗进展

新辅助化疗后再手术和（或）放疗已成为治疗局部晚期乳腺癌的治疗模式。本文综述新辅助化疗的依据、疗程方案、影响疗效及预后相关因素及其优缺点，同时介绍了局部晚期乳腺癌诊断，局部治疗及内分泌治疗等方面的进展。     

Locally advanced/inflammatory breast cancers treated with intensive epirubicin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy: are there molecular markers in the primary tumour that predict for 5-year clinical outcome?

BACKGROUND: Locally advanced and/or inflammatory breast cancer (LABC) is a heterogeneous disease. Molecular markers may help to understand this heterogeneity. This paper reports the results of a study assessing the potential prognostic or predictive value of HER-2, p53, cyclinD1, MIB1, ER and PgR expression by immunohistochemistry from patients included in an EORTC-NCIC-SAKK trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 448 patients with a cytological or histological diagnosis of LABC were randomised into a trial comparing two anthracycline-based neoadjuvant regimens. Chemotherapy was followed by standard locoregional therapy. Survival was comparable in both arms. We collected and analysed centrally paraffin-embedded tumour specimens from 187 (72.5%) of 258 patients that had a histological diagnosis. RESULTS: Of the patients included in this molecular marker study 114 relapsed and 91 died. In the multivariate analysis p53 positivity was associated with a shorter progression-free survival [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.96; 95% CI 1.33-2.91; P = 0.0008) and a shorter overall survival (HR = 1.98; 95% CI 1.28-3.06; P = 0.002). PgR positivity predicted for a longer overall survival (HR = 0.54; 95% CI 0.35-0.83; P = 0.0045). CONCLUSIONS: p53 was an independent factor predicting for survival. In order to clarify whether p53 is a pure prognostic and/or a predictive factor, a phase III trial is being conducted (EORTC 10994/BIG 00-01 study) using functional assay in yeast from frozen tumour samples.     

Serum DNA methylation for monitoring response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients

Patients with large or nonoperable breast cancers often receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy to facilitate full resection of the tumor and enable conservation of the breast. However, currently available methods for evaluation of response during therapy are limited and the actual effect of the treatment is only recognized at surgery upon completion of chemotherapy. Timely assessment of response could allow individual tailoring of the treatment and save noneffective drugs and unnecessary toxicity. Here, we suggest that tumor derived DNA methylation in the serum may reflect changes in tumor burden and allow early recognition of responders versus nonresponders. In this pilot study, we collected 7 consecutive serum samples from 52 patients with locally advanced breast cancer during neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We selected RASSF1, which was methylated in more than 80% of the tumors, for serum analysis. Using the "methylation sensitive PCR and high resolution melting," we detected RASSF1 methylation in the serum of 21 patients prior to therapy. In four patients who achieved complete pathological response, RASSF1 methylation in the serum became undetectable early during therapy. In contrast, in 17 patients that had partial or minimal pathological response, serum RASSF1 methylation persisted longer or throughout the treatment (complete versus partial response p = 0.02). These findings support further development of this assay for monitoring response during neoadjuvant therapy.     

局部晚期乳腺癌术前化疗的疗效分析

目的：探讨新辅助化疗应用于局部晚期乳腺癌患者的疗效。方法：回顾性分析62例局部晚期乳腺癌患者进行新辅助化疗的临床资料,62例患者手术前均进行TA方案化疗4段,其中吡柔比星50mg/m^2,d1,多西他赛135mg/m^2,d2,3周方案,化疗后白细胞低下者予以对症治疗,手术后的治疗方案依据新辅助化疗疗效及病理结果而定。结果：新辅助化疗有效率为90.3%（56/62）,其中完全缓解6.5%（4/62）,术后随访6个月至60个月,50例存活,其中41例为无病生存,占68.3%,死亡12例。结论：新辅助化疗能使局部晚期乳腺癌原发灶和腋窝淋巴结缩小,肿瘤降期,减少肿瘤的远处转移和复发,改善患者预后,且临床毒副反应可以耐受。     

Phase II study of neoadjuvant paclitaxel and cisplatin for operable and locally advanced breast cancer: analysis of 126 patients

In an earlier study, we have demonstrated a high clinical and pathologic response rate of neoadjuvant paclitaxel (P) and cisplatin (C) for patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). The current phase II study includes larger number of patients who had longer follow-up. A total of 126 consecutive patients with noninflammatory LABC (T2 >4 cm, T3 or T4, N0-N3, M0) were included in the study. Patients were scheduled to receive three to four cycles of the neoadjuvant PC (paclitaxel 135 mg m(-2) and cisplatin 75 mg m(-2) on day 1) every 21 days. Patients were then subjected to surgery and subsequently received six cycles of FAC (5-fluorouracil 500 mg m(-2), doxorubicin 50 mg m(-2), and cyclophosphamide 500 mg m(-2)) or four cycles of AC (doxorubicin 60 mg m(-2) and cyclophosphamide 600 mg m(-2)); all drugs were administered intravenously on day 1 with cycles repeated every 21 days. Patients then received radiation therapy, and those with hormone receptor-positive tumours were given adjuvant tamoxifen intended for 5 years. The median age was 41 years. Clinically, 12, 52, and 37% of patients had T2 >4 cm, T3, and T4, respectively. The mean tumour size was 7 cm (95% CI, 7.3-8.5). The clinical nodal status was N0, N1, and N2-N3 in 32, 52, and 17% of patients, respectively. Disease stage at diagnosis was IIA (2%), IIB (32%), IIIA (28%), and IIIB (39%). Clinical assessment of the primary tumour and the axillary nodal status after primary chemotherapy showed that 35 patients (28%) achieved complete response (cCR), while 80 (63%) demonstrated partial response to PC. Of patients with evaluable pathologic data of the primary tumour (123 patients), complete pathologic response (pCR) was achieved in 29 patients (24%), and an additional nine (7%) only had a microinvasive disease. Moreover, 20 of the 122 patients (16%) had no residual disease in the primary tumour or in the axillary nodes. Failure to attain cCR predicted failure to achieve pCR. At a median follow-up of 37.5 months (95% CI, 31.5-43.3), 71% were alive with no recurrence, 16% were alive with evidence of disease, and 13% were dead. Of the 122 patients who had surgery, 36 (29%) developed recurrence including one of the patients who attained pCR. The median overall or disease-free survival has not been reached with a projected 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of 85% (+/-4%) and 63% (+/-5%), respectively. On multivariate analysis, clinical response of the primary tumour, pathological response of the primary tumour, and the pathological nodal status were identified as independent prognostic variables for DFS. No variable, however, was identified to prognosticate OS. PC was acceptably safe. Neoadjuvant PC as used in this phase II study in a multidisciplinary strategy was highly effective. Clinical and pathologic responses remain the most important variables that predict outcome.     

Biological factors of prognostic significance in locally advanced breast cancer

Summary The biological features of tumour type, histological grade, vascular invasion, mitotic index, DNA index, and oestrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) status have been investigated as prognostic factors in primary operable breast cancer. We have studied these 7 factors in locally advanced primary breast cancer (LAPC): these patients have occult metastases at presentation.Of 60 consecutive patients presenting with locally advanced disease, 36 were treated initially with Tamoxifen and 24 by radiotherapy. Treatment failure was followed by cross-over to the other therapy. All patients were assessed for response in the primary tumour; external review of response was obtained. Survival was compared using the generalised Wilcoxon test.Response to therapy correlated significantly with histological grade (p = 0.02), ER (p = 0.02), PgR status (p = 0.02), mitotic index (p = 0.01), and tumour ploidy (p = 0.04). Survival from initial therapy correlated significantly with ER (p = 0.01) and PgR status (p = 0.04).Histological grade, mitotic index, tumour ploidy, and ER and PgR status of the primary tumour predict response and prognosis in patients with locally advanced (stage III) breast cancer.     

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with infusional 5-fluorouracil, adriamycin and cyclophosphamide (iFAC) in locally advanced breast cancer: an early response predicts good prognosis.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), adriamycin and cyclophosphamide (iFAC) in locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty-two LABC patients were treated with neoadjuvant iFAC chemotherapy including infusional 5-FU (1000 mg/m2, continuous intravenous infusion, days 1-3), adriamycin (40 mg/m2, intravenous bolus, day 1) and cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2, intravenous bolus, day 1) every 3 weeks until maximum tumor response. Patients subsequently received surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy and hormonal therapy as appropriate. RESULTS: Downstaging occurred in 71 of the 82 patients (86.6%). Seventy-two patients (67 patients with downstaging and five patients without downstaging) were resectable (resectability rate, 87.8%). The clinical response rate was 84.2%, with a complete response (CR) rate of 17.1% and a pathological CR rate of 7.8%. During 891 cycles of chemotherapy, the most common grade 3/4 hematological toxicity was leukopenia (36.0%). There were no treatment-related deaths. The median follow-up period was 51 months, with a median overall survival (OS) of 66 months, and a 5 year OS rate of 50.9% for all patients. The 5 year OS and disease-free survival (DFS) rates of the 64 patients who underwent surgery were 55.8% and 44.7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with iFAC had a comparable response rate and DFS to the conventional bolus FAC regimen, with an acceptable toxicity in LABC using the AJCC 2002 staging system. An early response to neoadjuvant iFAC was a favorable prognostic factor.     

Factors that predict early treatment failure for patients with locally advanced (T4) breast cancer

Locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) is associated with dire prognosis despite progress in multimodal treatments. We evaluated several clinical and pathological features of patients with either noninflammatory (NIBC, cT4a-c) or inflammatory (IBC, cT4d) breast cancer to identify subset groups of patients with high risk of early treatment failure. Clinical and pathological features of 248 patients with LABC, who were treated with multimodality treatments including neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery and radiotherapy were reassessed. Tumour samples obtained at surgery were evaluated using standard immunohistochemical methods. Overall, 141 patients (57%) presented with NIBC (cT4a-c, N0-2, M0) and 107 patients (43%) with IBC (cT4d, N0-2, M0). Median follow-up time was 27.5 months (range: 1.6-87.8). No significant difference in terms of recurrence-free survival (RFS) (P=0.72), disease-free survival (DFS) (P=0.98) and overall survival (OS) (P=0.35) was observed between NIBC and IBC. At the multivariate analysis, patients with ER- and PgR-negative diseases had a significantly worse RFS than patients with ER- and/or PgR-positive diseases (hazard ratio: 2.47, 95% CI: 1.33-4.59 for overall). The worst RFS was observed for the subgroup of patients with endocrine nonresponsive and HER2-negative breast cancer (2-year RFS: 57% in NIBC and 57% in IBC) A high Ki-67 labelling index (>20% of the invasive tumour cells) and the presence of peritumoral vascular invasion (PVI) significantly correlated with poorer RFS in overall (HR 2.69, 95% CI: 1.61-4.50 for Ki-67>20% and HR 2.27, 95% CI: 1.42-3.62 for PVI). Patients with endocrine nonresponsive LABC had the most dire treatment outcome. High degree of Ki-67 staining and presence of PVI were also indicators of higher risk of early relapse. These factors should be considered in therapeutic algorithms for LABC.     

High complete pathological response in locally advanced breast cancer using paclitaxel and cisplatin

Background.In an earlier study, we have demonstrated a high response rate in metastatic breast cancer using paclitaxel (P) and cisplatin (C). A phase II study using the same regimen (PC) has been conducted in locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). Methods.A total of 72 consecutive patients with non-inflammatory LABC (T24cm, T3 or T4, N0–N2, M0). Patients were scheduled to receive 3–4 cycles of the neoadjuvant PC (paclitaxel 135mg/m² and cisplatin 75mg/m² on day 1) every 21 days. Patients were then subjected to surgery and subsequently received 6 cycles of FAC (5-fluorouracil 500mg/m², doxorubicin 50mg/m², and cyclophosphamide 500mg/m²) or 4 cycles of AC (doxorubicin 60mg/m², and cyclophosphamide 600mg/m²). Patients then received radiation therapy, and those with hormone receptor positive tumors were given adjuvant tamoxifen intended for 5 years. Results.The median age was 39 years (range, 24–78). Clinically, 7%, 58%, and 35% of patients had T24cm, T3, and T4, respectively. Disease stage at diagnosis was IIB (33%), IIIA (27%), and IIIB (40%). Complete and partial clinical response to PC was demonstrated in 13 (18%), and 52 (72%) patients, respectively. Of those patients with evaluable pathologic response (68 patients), complete pathologic response (pCR) was achieved in 15 (22%) patients. At a median follow-up of 22 (±3.5) months, 58 (81%) were alive with no recurrence, nine (12%) were alive with evidence of disease, and five (7%) were dead. None of the patients achieving pCR has developed any relapse. The median overall survival has not been reached for all 72 patients with a projected 3-year survival (±SE) of 90% (±4%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 42.1 (±4.8) months with a projected PFS of 74%±7% at 3-years (for 68 patients). Conclusions.PC regimen in LABC produced a high pCR. The contribution of the other added modalities to survival could not be assessed.     

Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) in patients with operable breast cancer who undergo breast-conserving treatment after receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy: Risk factors of IBTR and validation of the MD Anderson Prognostic Index

BACKGROUND:

There is limited information about the risk factors for ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) after patients undergo breast‐conserving surgery plus radiotherapy (breast‐conserving treatment [BCT]) subsequent to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). The objective of the current study was to analyze these risk factors.

METHODS:

The authors collected data from 375 patients who underwent BCT and received NAC and analyzed the risk of IBTR associated with undergoing BCT after NAC. The usefulness of the MD Anderson Prognostic Index (MDAPI) for IBTR also was validated using the current data set.

RESULTS:

The median follow‐up was 47.8 months, and the 4‐year IBTR‐free survival rate was 95.6%. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that estrogen receptor (ER) status and multifocality of the residual tumor were associated significantly with IBTR‐free survival. In addition, patients who had ER‐positive and human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)‐negative tumors did not develop IBTR during the observation period. Although prognostic stratification according to MDAPI was relatively good for the prediction of IBTR in the study patients, the IBTR rate in the high‐risk group was not very high and was lower than that in the intermediate‐risk group. Multivariate analyses demonstrated that IBTR was an independent predictive factor for overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS:

ER status and multifocality of the residual tumor after NAC were independent predictors of IBTR after BCT. The MDAPI was barely adaptable to the study patients in terms of predicting IBTR. Patients with ER‐positive and HER2‐negative tumors had a favorable prognosis, whereas patients who developed IBTR after NAC had significantly worse overall survival. The authors propose a new IBTR prognostic index using the 2 factors that were identified as predictive of IBTR: ER status and multifocality of the residual tumor. Cancer 2012. © 2012 American Cancer Society.     

Differential response of triple‐negative breast cancer to a docetaxel and carboplatin‐based neoadjuvant treatment

BACKGROUND:

In this study, the authors evaluated whether a pathologic complete response (pCR) or a clinical complete response (cCR) to neoadjuvant treatment in patients with locally advanced breast cancer differed among the 3 subtypes of breast cancer: triple‐negative breast cancer (TNBC), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)‐positive breast cancer, and hormone receptor‐positive/HER2‐negative breast cancer. Whether a cCR or a pCR was correlated with fewer recurrences and better survival also was investigated.

METHODS:

Patients with stage II/III breast cancer received 4 cycles of neoadjuvant docetaxel and carboplatin (TC) every 3 weeks. Patients with HER2‐positive tumors were randomized to receive either additional weekly trastuzumab preoperatively or TC alone. Postoperatively, all patients received 4 cycles of TC, and all HER2‐positive patients received a total of 52 weeks of trastuzumab. The recurrence‐free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) rates at 2 years were reported.

RESULTS:

Seventy‐four patients were enrolled, including 11 patients with TNBC, 30 patients with HER2‐positive tumors, and 33 patients with hormone receptor‐positive/HER2‐negative tumor. The cCR rates were 45.4%, 50% and 40.6% in TNBC, HER2‐positive, and hormone receptor‐positive/HER2‐negative groups, respectively. The pCR rate for the entire group was 26.8%, and patients with TNBC had the best response (54.6%) followed by patients with HER2‐positive tumors (24.1%) and patients with hormone receptor‐positive/HER2‐negative tumors (19.4%; P = .0126). The pCR rate for patients with HER2‐positive tumors improved from 7% to 40% if trastuzumab was added (P = .08). Infiltrating ductal cancer, TNBC, negative estrogen receptor and/or progesterone receptor status, tumor classification predicted a pCR (P ≤ .05). Multivariate analysis using a logistic regression test indicated that tumor type was an independent predictor. The RFS rate for patients who did versus patients who did not achieve a pCR was 93.8% versus 78.4% at 2 years, respectively, and 83.3% versus 58% at 3 years, respectively (P = .1227); whereas, for patients who did versus patients who did not achieve a cCR, the RFS rate was 80.9% versus 83.9%, respectively, at 2 years and 65% versus 64.3%, respectively, at 3 years (P = .999).

CONCLUSIONS:

The current results indicated that the TC combination is promising for the treatment of TNBC. The addition of trastuzumab to TC improved the pCR rate significantly in patients with HER2‐positive breast cancer. Cancer 2010. © 2010 American Cancer Society.     

肿瘤体积对局部进展期直肠癌预后的影响

目的:探讨肿瘤体积(gross tumor volume,GTV)对接受新辅助放化疗(neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy,NCRT)和全直肠系膜切除术(total mesorectal excision,TME)后,局部进展期直肠癌(locally advanced rectal cancer,LARC)患者的预后影响。方法:回顾性分析2011年1月至2016年9月湖南省肿瘤医院收治的128例初治直肠癌患者的临床资料,均接受术前同步放化疗+TME。采用受试者工作特征曲线(receiver-operating characteristic,ROC)分析GTV截点值,用Kaplan-Meier生存分析和Cox比例风险回归模型进行预后分析。结果:行NCRT后T分期降期率为58.6%,N分期降期率为69.5%,总体降期率为77.3%,病理完全缓解(pathologi-cal complete response,p CR)率为16.4%,总体保肛率为57.03%。GTV的截点为79.31 m L,GTV≥79.31 m L与GTV<79.31 m L患者的3年总生存...     

Recommendations from an international expert panel on the use of neoadjuvant (primary) systemic treatment of operable breast cancer: new perspectives 2006.

Neoadjuvant (primary systemic) treatment has become a standard option for primary operable disease for patients who are candidates for adjuvant systemic chemotherapy, irrespective of the size of the tumor. Because of new treatments and new understandings of breast cancer, however, recommendations published in 2006 regarding neoadjuvant treatment for operable disease required updating. Therefore, a third international panel of representatives of a number of breast cancer clinical research groups was convened in September 2006 to update these recommendations. As part of this effort, data published to date were critically reviewed and indications for neoadjuvant treatment were newly defined.