Long-term lamivudine monotherapy prevents development of hepatitis B virus infection in hepatitis B surface-antigen negative liver transplant recipients from hepatitis B core-antibody-positive donors

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation from hepatitis B core-antibody (HBcAb)-positive donors to hepatitis B surface-antigen (HBsAg)-negative recipients has been associated with a risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in the absence of antiviral prophylaxis. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of long-term lamivudine monotherapy to prevent development of HBV infection in HBsAg-negative recipients of liver allografts from HBcAb-positive donors. METHODS: From 315 cadaveric adult liver transplantations performed at our unit between July 1999 and March 2005, 18 recipients (5.7%) received liver allografts from HBcAb-positive donors, 13 of whom were HBsAg-negative pre-transplantation. The recipients consisted of four females and 14 males, age range 28-65 yr (median 49.5 yr). Post-transplantation, HBsAg-negative recipients were administered lamivudine 100 mg daily long term. HBsAg-positive recipients were administered low-dose hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIg) and lamivudine according to our usual protocol. Standard post-transplantation immunosuppression was given. Recipients were followed up regularly (range 2-69 months, median 21 months) for development of de novo HBV infection. RESULTS: Ten HBsAg-negative recipients received long-term lamivudine. One patient (HBcAb and HBsAb positive pre-transplant) did not receive lamivudine and, in two patients, lamivudine was discontinued following urgent re-transplantation for primary graft non-function. All 13 of the HBsAg-negative recipients were still alive, with no evidence of HBV infection at the end of follow-up. CONCLUSION: Long-term lamivudine monotherapy was effective in preventing development of HBV infection in HBsAg-negative liver transplant recipients from HBcAb-positive donors.     

Lamivudine monoprophylaxis for liver transplant recipients with non-replicating hepatitis B virus infection

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of lamivudine (LAM) monoprophylaxis for patients with non-replicating hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection at orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). METHODS: Among 128 liver recipients with HBV infection between 1994 and 2004 transplanted at our institution, 60 had non-replicating HBV infection at the time of OLT. Of those, 26 patients received LAM prophylaxis (monoprophylaxis group) and 34 patients received LAM and hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) prophylaxis (combination group) after OLT. RESULTS: Median follow-up after OLT was 67 and 54 months, for monoprophylaxis and combination groups respectively. One and five yr patient/graft survival were 96/85% and 96/80% in monoprophylaxis group, and 85/79% and 67/55% in combination group. HBV DNA was re-detected or increased >10(5) IU/mL in four patients (15%) at 20-29 month in monoprophylaxis group and six (18%) at 4-35 months in combination group. Recurrent hepatitis was seen in two patients (8%) at 27 and 45 months and monoprophylaxis group and three (9%) at 21-35 months in combination group. The rate of recurrence was not statistically different between two groups. CONCLUSION: LAM monoprophylaxis seemed to be effective for OLT recipients with HBV infection who had non-replicating HBV at transplantation. HBIG administration may play a less valuable role in preventing HBV recurrence in this group of patients.     

The effect of HBsAg-positivity of kidney donors on long-term patient and graft outcome

The number of patients on the kidney waiting list is increasing, creating a shortage of donor organs. To solve this problem, there is an interest in transplanting organs formerly considered marginal or undesirable. We performed seven (four living related, three cadaveric) kidney transplants from hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive donors. Hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA were negative in the living donors and were unknown in cadaveric donors. Liver function tests were in the normal range in all of the donors. All of the recipients were HBsAg-negative and hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs)-positive. Recipients receiving kidneys from cadaveric donors were given prophylactic lamivudine treatment postoperatively. Anti-HBs remained positive throughout the follow-up period in all but one patient with a cadaveric graft. None of the patients receiving a kidney from an HBsAg-positive donor developed clinical HBV infection in a mean follow-up period of 42.6 +/- 36.8 months (range: 16 to 121 months, median 30 months). Liver function tests remained in the normal ranges in all patients. All the grafts are still functioning with a mean serum creatinine level of 1.6 +/- 0.85 mg/dL. In conclusion, transplants from HBsAg-positive and HBeAg-/HBV DNA-negative donors seem to carry no risk to the recipients who are immune to HBV. Even cadaveric donors with HBsAg-positivity and unknown HBeAg/HBV DNA status can be used with caution in selected recipients without significantly affecting graft and patient outcome.     

Kidney Transplantation from Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Positive Donors into Hepatitis B Surface Antibody Positive Recipients: A Prospective Nonrandomized Controlled Study from a Single Center

The number of patients on renal transplant waiting list is increasing rapidly in many countries, exacerbating the shortage of organs. We conducted a study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of deceased-donor kidney transplantation from hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive (+) donors into hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs)-positive (+) recipients. Sixty-five patients received grafts from HBsAg(+) donors, and 308 subjects received grafts from HBsAg-negative(−) donors. Posttransplantation, recipients with HBsAg(−) grafts or HBsAg(+) grafts received 400 U of hepatitis B immunoglobulin once and twice, respectively. The seven recipients who received grafts from hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA(+) donors were treated with hepatitis B immunoglobulin 400 U weekly for 3 months and lamivudine 100 mg daily for 6 months. All patients were monitored for liver function and hepatitis B viral status. The follow-up period was 38.7 ± 15.4 months. Although two recipients developed de novo HBV infection, neither patient developed severe liver dysfunction nor died. The incidence of liver injury (39/65 vs. 207/308, chi-square test, p > 0.05) and survival (log-rank test, p > 0.05) did not differ between the groups. We conclude that anti-HBs(+) recipients receiving HBsAg(+) grafts did as well as those receiving HBsAg(−) grafts.     

Living donor liver transplantation from hepatitis B core antibody positive donors

Liver allografts from donors previously exposed to hepatitis B virus (HBV) carry the risk of transmission of HBV infection to immunosuppressed recipients. However, exclusion of donor candidates with the serologic evidence of resolved hepatitis B-HBV surface antigen (HbsAg) negative and HBV core antibody (anti-HBc) positive-is not feasible in countries endemic for HBV. AIM: Our aim was to assess the safety of living donor liver transplantation from anti-HBc positive donors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In our institution, 152 transplants were performed between June 1999 and April 2004. Fifty-six (37%) of the living donors were anti-HBc positive. Twenty of these liver grafts were transplanted to HbsAg-negative recipients. We excluded four HBsAg negative recipients who died because of early complications after transplantation. Lamivudine (100 mg/day) was given for prophylaxis of de novo HBV infection. RESULTS: The mean follow-up time for 16 HBsAg-negative recipients was 21.7 (7-48) months. None of them experienced de novo HBV infection. CONCLUSION: The use of liver allografts from anti-HBc-positive living donors is reasonably safe in HBsAg-negative recipients under lamivudine prophylaxis.     

Beneficial Effects of Short-Term Lamivudine Treatment for de novo Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation After Liver Transplantation

Clearance of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) by lamivudine is achieved in only a small proportion of patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. We investigated the effect of lamivudine on de novo HBV reactivation after living-donor liver transplantation when the number of HBV was expected to be very small. Thirty-eight HBV-naive recipients who received liver grafts from antibodies to core antigen-positive donors receiving hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) were studied. HBsAg appeared in nine cases (23.7 %) despite receiving HBIG for 12-71 months (mean: 35.1 months) after transplantation. Lamivudine treatment was started in six recipients during the acute phase of HBV reactivation. Five of the six recipients achieved complete clearance of HBsAg in sera at a median of 4.6 months (ranging from 21 to 330 days) after lamivudine administration. Although lamivudine was stopped in four cases, all remained negative for HBsAg. Our findings suggested that short-term lamivudine treatment during acute phase of HBV reactivation could achieve complete clearance of HBsAg in a significant number of liver transplant recipients.     

Transplantation of hepatitis B surface antigen-positive livers into hepatitis B virus-positive recipients and the role of hepatitis delta coinfection.

The scarcity of liver donors requires consideration of grafts from sources not previously used. Allografts from hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-carriers without a significant liver disease have been proposed for liver transplant recipients with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Combination prophylaxis schemes against HBV post-liver transplantation (LT) recurrence are currently available; the efficacy of those schemes in HBV-related cirrhosis and HCC must be assessed. This report describes the allocation of HBsAg-positive grafts in three HBsAg-positive recipients, with HBV-related cirrhosis and evolving HCC lesions, two of them with hepatitis Delta virus (HDV) coinfection. Patients were administered anti-hepatitis B immunoglobulins (HBIGs) and lamivudine in order to prevent HBV recurrence. In spite of anti-HBV prophylaxis, HBV infection did persist after LT in all patients (no serum clearance of HBsAg). HBV replication assessed by serum HBV deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) presence was detected in the first month after LT in the 3 recipients. A prompt HDV reinfection with a clinical and histological pattern of hepatitis was observed in the 2 HBV / HDV coinfected recipients. In 1 of them, an evolving chronic hepatitis required a second LT. The non-HDV-infected patient showed an uneventful follow-up, but the lack of the neutralizing effect of HBIGs and the high risk of escape mutants forced the addition of adefovir-dipivoxil to lamivudine, in order to prevent viral variants and hepatitis recurrence. In conclusion, allografts from HBsAg-positive donors in HBsAg-positive recipients are associated with the persistence of the HBsAg after LT due to the failure of HBIG prophylaxis, even if lamivudine does inhibit virion production. This condition favors HDV replication and HDV hepatitis recurrence in coinfected patients. The allocation of HBsAg-positive grafts in HBsAg-positive recipients could be justified only in recipients without HDV coinfection and a combined prophylaxis with lamivudine and adefovir-dipivoxil is currently the best way to manage escape mutants in these recipients.     

Hepatitis B virus infection in heart transplant recipients in a hepatitis B endemic area.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is hyperendemic in Taiwan. It is almost impossible for us to reject organ donors or recipients with positive serum hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). We report our experience with HBV infection in heart transplant recipients with particular attention to outcome of recipients who were HBsAg+ or who had received donor hearts from HBsAg+ donors. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of medical records. RESULTS: In the study, we included 101 heart recipients with post-transplant survival of more than 6 months. According to pre-transplant HBV serology markers, we divided patients into 4 groups. Group 1 (n = 8) had been HBsAg+ at the time of heart transplantation. Of these, 6 patients had HBV reactivation in the post-transplant follow-up and needed lamivudine treatment. Complete response was achieved in all 6 patients; however, HBV recurrence occurred in 1 patient after 8 months of lamivudine treatment. The recurrence remained under partial control. Group 2 (n = 16) was HBV na?ve at the time of heart transplantation. Of these, 2 received HBsAg+ donor hearts under perioperative hepatitis B immunoglobulin prophylaxis. HBV infection was successfully prevented in 1 patient, but the other contracted HBV hepatitis, which was successfully treated with lamivudine. In Group 2, 10 patients received donor hearts from anti-HBs+ donors, and none contracted HBV hepatitis after transplantation. Group 3 (n = 55) had protective anti-HBs antibody at the time of heart transplantation either from previous HBV vaccination (n = 10) or from natural HGB infection (n = 45). HBsAg+ donor hearts were transplanted into 2 patients with anti-HBs from previous HBV vaccination, and into 8 patients with anti-HBs form natural HBV infection. However, none of these 10 patients who received HBsAg+ donor hearts had HBV hepatitis after transplantation. Group 4 (n = 22) was HBs-, anti-HBs-, and anti-HBc+ at the time of heart transplantation. Of these, 7 patients received HBsAg+ donor hearts. Six patients experienced no HBV hepatitis after heart transplantation, and serum HBV DNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) at the time of heart transplantation was negative in all 6 patients. One patient had HBV hepatitis after transplantation, and serum HBV DNA by PCR at the time of heart transplantation also was positive. CONCLUSION: HBV reactivation after the heart transplantation was common but usually well controlled with lamivudine treatment. Therefore, HBV carrier status should not contraindicate heart transplantation. HBsAg+ donor hearts were safely transplanted into anti-HBs+ recipients; therefore, HBsAg+ itself was not a contraindication to heart donation. Patients with HBsAg-, anti-HBs-, anti-HBc+, and negative HBV DNA in the serum by PCR could be protected from HBV infection from HBsAg+ donor hearts. However, patients with HBsAg-, anti-HBs-, anti-HBc+, and positive HBV DNA in the serum by PCR should be recognized as HBV carriers and closely followed for potential HBV flare-up after heart transplantation.     

Prevention of de novo hepatitis B virus infection in living donor liver transplantation using hepatitis B core antibody positive donors

Exclusion of liver grafts from hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc) positive donors to prevent de novo hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection after liver transplantation is not feasible in areas highly endemic for HBV virus like Taiwan, where approximately 80% of adults are anti-HBc(+). The efficacy of lamivudine monotherapy to prevent de novo HBV infection after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) using grafts from anti-HBc(+) donors remains to be elucidated. From June 1994 to August 2000, LDLT was performed in 42 recipients. Twenty-four of the 42 donors were anti-HBc(+) (57%). Pre-transplant HBV vaccination was given to all recipients irrespective of anti-HBc status at monthly intervals for 3 months. Until December 1997, eight recipients received liver grafts from anti-HBc(+) donors without prophylaxis. Since January 1998, prophylaxis with lamivudine monotherapy was given to 16 recipients receiving liver grafts from anti-HBc(+) donors. De novo HBV infection occurred in three of the eight recipients (37.5%) who did not receive prophylaxis, while none of the 16 recipients given lamivudine developed de novo HBV infection after a mean follow-up of 25 months. Two of the three recipients with de novo HBV infection were anti-HBs(-) and one recipient was anti-HBs(+). Lamivudine was well tolerated, and no side effects were noted. These results suggest that lamivudine monotherapy for recipients receiving anti-HBc(+) liver grafts is a simple, relatively inexpensive and effective prophylactic regimen for prevention of de novo HBV infection. The additive protection provided by vaccine-induced or natural immunity is uncertain.     

Virologic and Clinical Outcomes of Hepatitis B Virus Infection in HIV‐HBV Coinfected Transplant Recipients

Liver transplantation (LT) is the treatment of choice for end‐stage liver disease, but is controversial in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Using a prospective cohort of HIV‐hepatitis B virus (HBV) coinfected patients transplanted between 2001–2007; outcomes including survival and HBV clinical recurrence were determined. Twenty‐two coinfected patients underwent LT; 45% had detectable HBV DNA pre‐LT and 72% were receiving anti‐HBV drugs with efficacy against lamivudine‐resistant HBV. Post‐LT, all patients received hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) plus nucleos(t)ide analogues and remained HBsAg negative without clinical evidence of HBV recurrence, with a median follow‐up 3.5 years. Low‐level HBV viremia (median 108 IU/mL, range 9–789) was intermittently detected in 7/13 but not associated with HBsAg detection or ALT elevation. Compared with 20 HBV monoinfected patients on similar HBV prophylaxis and median follow‐up of 4.0 years, patient and graft survival were similar: 100% versus 85% in HBV mono‐ versus coinfected patients (p = 0.08, log rank test). LT is effective for HIV‐HBV coinfected patients with complications of cirrhosis, including those who are HBV DNA positive at the time of LT. Combination HBIG and antivirals is effective as prophylaxis with no clinical evidence of HBV recurrence but low‐level HBV DNA is detectable in ～50% of recipients.     

The Outcomes of Kidney Transplantation in Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg)–Negative Recipients Receiving Graft From HBsAg‐Positive Donors: A Retrospective,Propensity Score‐Matched Study

The outcomes of kidney transplantation (KT) from hepatitis B surface antigen–positive [HBsAg(+)] donors to HBsAg(?) recipients remain inconclusive, possibly due to substantial differences in methodological and statistical models, number of patients, follow‐up duration, hepatitis B virus (HBV) prophylactic regimens and hepatitis B surface antibody (anti‐HBs) levels. The present retrospective, longitudinal study ( clinicaltrial.gov NCT02044588) using propensity score matching technique was conducted to compare outcomes of KT between HBsAg(?) recipients with anti‐HBs titer above 100 mIU/mL undergoing KT from HBsAg(+) donors (n = 43) and HBsAg(?) donors (n = 86). During the median follow‐up duration of 58.2 months (range 16.7–158.3 months), there were no significant differences in graft and patient survivals. No HBV‐infective markers, including HBsAg, hepatitis B core antibody, hepatitis B extracellular antigen and HBV DNA quantitative test were detected in HBsAg(+) donor group. Renal pathology outcomes revealed comparable incidences of kidney allograft rejection while there were no incidences of HBV‐associated glomerulonephritis and viral antigen staining. Recipients undergoing KT from HBsAg(+) donors with no HBV prophylaxis (n = 20) provided comparable outcomes with those treated with lamivudine alone (n = 21) or lamivudine in combination with HBV immunoglobulin (n = 2). In conclusion, KT without HBV prophylaxis from HBsAg(+) donors without hepatitis B viremia to HBsAg(?) recipients with anti‐HBs titer above 100 mIU/mL provides excellent graft and patient survivals without evidence of HBV transmission.

     

Twenty-four year single-center experience of hepatitis B virus infection in heart transplantation

Objective

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is hyperendemic in Taiwan. We have reported the outcome of (1) recipients with hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive; HBsAg-negative recipients who receive donor hearts from HBsAg-positive donors; and treatment with lamivudine of hepatitis B flare-ups after heart transplantation, using case numbers that range from 100 to 200.

Methods

From July 1987 to May 2011, all 412 orthotopic heart transplant recipients and donors underwent routine preoperative screening for hepatitis B virus markers and liver function parameters. Lamivudine was prescribed prophylactically for recipients with elevated serum enzyme levels or an HBV DNA virus load before transplantation, or when there was evidence of hepatitis B flare-up after transplantation. Postoperative HBV markers and liver function parameters were collected over a mean follow-up time of 7.8 years.

Results

Thirty-four recipients were HBsAg-positive before heart transplantation, and 23 experiencing HBV reactivation upon follow-up requiring lamivudine treatment. Clinical responses were achieved in all of them: 15 were complete and two, slow partial responses. Twenty-six recipients with an HBV naïve status at the time of heart transplantation, and three patients received donor hearts from an HBsAg-positive donor under perioperative hepatitis B immunoglobulin prophylaxis. HBV infection was successfully prevented in two patients, but the other one contracted HBV hepatitis, which was successfully treated with lamivudine.

Conclusions

HBV reactivation after the heart transplantation was common but usually well controlled with lamivudine treatment. Although posttransplantation liver function deteriorated for a period, there was no HBV infection-related morbidity or mortality. Perioperative hepatitis B immunoglobulin prophylaxis can successfully prevent HBV naïve recipients from infection in some cases, but HBsAg-positive donors should only be considered in high risk situations.     

Five-year follow-up of a hepatitis B virus-positive recipient of hepatitis B surface antigen-positive living donor liver graft.

The shortage of cadaveric donor organs has led to the use of living donors and marginal cadaveric donors. To date, there have been only 2 reports on the use of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive liver grafts. Here we describe the 5-yr posttransplantation sequence of a hepatitis B virus (HBV)-positive recipient who received an HBsAg-positive living donor liver graft. A 43-yr-old HBV-positive patient with hepatorenal syndrome received a living donor liver graft in October 2000 from a 27-yr-old HBsAg-positive carrier with no clinical evidence of HBV infection other than the serologic markers. The recipient recovered slowly after liver transplantation (LT). Recipient serum HBsAg was continuously positive despite anti-HBV therapy with high-dose hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and lamivudine. The patient was also treated with famciclovir and interferon; to date, a final regimen of lamivudine and adefovir has kept liver function stable for 20 months. The recipient has lived for 64 months after transplantation. The donor has not revealed any clinical evidence of active hepatitis during follow-up. In conclusion, our result implicates that a recipient of liver graft from an HBsAg-positive carrier may survive for a long period following antiviral therapy with lamivudine and adefovir. Considering this living donor case and previously reported cases, the use of an HBsAg-positive cadaveric liver graft may deserve attention when no other donor is available.     

Impact of anti-hepatitis Bc-positive grafts on the outcome of liver transplantation for HBV-related cirrhosis

BACKGROUND: The present scarcity of organ donors requires consideration of grafts from sources not previously used. Several studies have addressed the use of grafts from donors who have antibodies to the hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc+). The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the use of anti-HBc+ grafts in patients transplanted for hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related cirrhosis. METHODS: Recipients of first hepatic transplants from donors with antibodies to HBV were identified retrospectively. All patients who had serology suggestive of active HBV and were negative for hepatitis C and D were included in the analysis. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to assess the actuarial recurrence-free survival on patients with graft survival longer than 1.5 months. The stepwise Cox regression model was used to identify independent predictors of HBV recurrence. RESULTS: One thousand seven hundred seventeen first liver transplants were performed at the Thomas E. Starzl Transplantation Institute from September 1, 1990, to December 31, 1999. HBV was the cause of cirrhosis in 112 patients (6.5%). Thirty-three patients had coexistent viral infection (23 HCV and 10 HDV). Fourteen donors (17.2%) were positive for HBV markers, with nine anti-HBc+ and with five both anti-HBc+ and anti-HB surface-positive; of these, 13 anti-HBc+ organ recipients had long-term survival. Nine (69.2%) of these cases were reinfected versus 20 (35.7%) in the group that received grafts from HBV- donors (P<0.05, Fisher's exact test). The mean time to reinfection was shorter in the anti-HBc+ group (2.9 yr vs. 6.4 yr, P<0.005). There were no statistical differences in graft or patient survival between the two groups. HBV prophylaxis with combined lamivudine and hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) significantly reduced the reinfection rate (P<0.03). Hepatitis Be (Hbe) antigen-positive recipients trended to faster reinfection (not significant). Cox regression analysis revealed that both anti-HBc graft donor status (RR, 2.796; P=0.020) and combination of lamivudine/HBIG (RR, 0.249; P=0.021) are independently associated with reinfection. CONCLUSIONS: The use of anti-HBc+ liver grafts does not affect graft or patient survival. However, patients who receive these organs are 2.5 times more likely to develop HBV recurrence. Lamivudine and HBIG combination decreases HBV recurrence 4-fold.     

Liver transplantation for HBsAg‐positive recipients using grafts from HBsAg‐positive deceased donors

This study reports our experience using deceased donor liver grafts from HBsAg‐positive donors. We performed eight cases of liver transplantation (LT) using grafts from deceased HBsAg‐positive donors between November 2005 and October 2010. The median age of donors was 48 years (range: 26–64). HBV DNA in the serum of donors ranged from 44 to 395 IU/ml, but HBeAg in all donors was negative. Preoperative laboratory and liver biopsy samples revealed the absence of definitive cirrhotic features and hepatitis. All recipients showed HBsAg positive preoperatively except one patient with HBsAg(?) status post previous LT for HBV related liver cirrhosis. The median age was 60 years (range: 46–76) at LT. Post‐LT antiviral management consisted of hepatitis B immunoglobulin and antiviral nucleos(t)ide analogues. The median follow‐up period was 25.5 months (range: 14–82). Of eight recipients, two recipients experienced serum HBsAg and HBV DNA disappearance postoperatively. Three recipients died of HBV‐unrelated causes. The remaining five recipients were stable with normal liver function and no marked pathologic changes on follow‐up biopsies. This experience shows that LT using grafts from deceased HBsAg‐positive donors is feasible, and may represent a valuable expansion of the pool of organ donors with appropriate antiviral management and monitoring.     

核苷类似物单药口服预防肝移植术后乙型病毒性肝炎复发的研究

目的探讨核苷类似物单药口服预防肝移植术后乙型病毒性肝炎(乙肝)复发的有效性和安全性。方法回顾性分析1999年10月至2014年4月在广东佛山市第一人民医院行肝移植的32例乙肝相关性疾病患者的临床资料。根据供体来源分为两个阶段。第一阶段为1999年10月至2007年9月的6例无心跳供体肝移植,供肝的乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)血清标志物均为(-),受体术前血清乙型肝炎表面抗原(HBsAg)、乙型肝炎核心抗体(抗-HBc)均为(+),其中2例合并乙型肝炎e抗原(HBeAg)(+),1例合并乙型肝炎e抗体(抗-HBe)(+),5例受体术前血清HBV脱氧核糖核酸(DNA)1 000 copies/ml,1例HBV DNA1 000 copies/ml。给予拉米夫定(100 mg/d)单药口服预防肝移植术后乙肝复发。第二阶段为2011年11月至2014年4月的26例心脏死亡器官捐献供体肝移植(其中1例为肝肾联合移植);供肝血清HBsAg(+)6例、(-)20例,乙型肝炎表面抗体(抗-HBs)(+)15例,HBeAg(+)2例,抗-HBc(+)14例,抗-HBe(+)5例;11例受体术前血清HBV DNA500 copies/ml,15例HBV DNA500 copies/ml;25例给予恩替卡韦0.5 mg/d、1例给予替比夫定600 mg/d单药口服预防乙肝复发。结果第一阶段肝移植受体中位随访时间为104个月,全部受体术后血清HBsAg和HBV DNA均转阴,至今未见乙肝复发。第二阶段肝移植受体中位随访时间为50周,20例接受HBsAg(-)供肝,其中1例于术后39周出现一过性HBsAg(+),随后又转阴;另1例肝肾联合移植受体在移植术后28周发生乙肝复发,但血清HBV DNA(-);其中15例采用抗-HBc(+)供体肝移植术后均未见乙肝复发。6例采用HBsAg(+)供体的肝移植受体术后HBsAg均未转阴。所有随访受体均存活,术后均未见HBV DNA复制,亦未发现核苷类似物相关不良反应。结论核苷类似物单药口服预防肝移植术后乙肝的复发是有效和安全的。     

Active Immunization to Prevent De Novo Hepatitis B Virus Infection in Pediatric Live Donor Liver Recipients

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of HBV vaccination as an alternative preventive measure against de novo HBV infection in pediatric living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Sixty recipients were enrolled in this study. Thirty received grafts from anti-HBc(+) donors, and another 30 received grafts from anti-HBc(-) donors. HBV vaccine was given pretransplant to every candidate. Posttransplant, lamivudine was routinely given to recipients receiving anti-HBc(+) grafts for about 2 years. Forty-seven (78%) recipients achieved high levels of anti-HBs titer (>1000 IU/L). Two (3.3%) recipients developed de novo HBV infection where one received an anti-HBc(-) graft and another received an anti-HBc(+) graft. Both recipients were in the lower anti-HBs titer group (<1000 IU/L). The incidence of de novo HBV infection was significantly higher in the lower titer group (15.4% vs. 0%, p = 0.04). The median follow-up period was 51 months in recipients with anti-HBc(-) grafts and 57 months in those with anti-HBc(+) grafts. Active immunization is an effective method to prevent de novo HBV infection. It can result in high levels of anti-HBs titer (>1000 IU/L) which may prevent de novo HBV infection in pediatric patients with efficient primary vaccination undergoing LDLT.     

Use of anti-HBc positive allografts in adult liver transplantation: toward a safer way to expand the donor pool

The use of livers from anti-hepatitis B core (HBc) positive donors can alleviate donor shortage. Nineteen of 367 (6%) adults receiving anti-HBc positive allografts [three were hepatitis B antigen (HBsAg) negative, hepatitis B antibody (HBsAb) positive; four were HBsAg positive and 12 were not exposed to hepatitis B viral (HBV) infection] were retrospectively reviewed. In HBsAg negative recipients, immunoprophylaxis (IP) was guided by viral serology and immunohistochemistry (IH) of day 0 and day 7 liver biopsies. If IH was negative, IP was stopped. None of three HBsAg negative, HBsAb positive recipients infected; one (replicating) of four HBsAg positive recipients reinfected and seven of eight (87.5%) HBsAg, HBsAb negative recipients, who did not receive long-term IP, infected after a median time of 2 years (range 1-5); one patient died of liver failure. Four HBsAg, HBsAb negative recipients, receiving life-long IP, remained infection free. Anti-HBc positive donor livers must be directed selectively first to HBsAg positive recipients, next to recipients having HBV antibodies and finally to HBV-naive recipients. Identification of both donor and recipient risk factors for HBV infection before transplantation allows indiscriminate use of antiviral prophylaxis. The necessity for IP therapy should be guided by HBV-DNA testing of donor liver tissue and serum. IH of early liver biopsies is an unreliable marker for predicting antiviral treatment requirements.     

Use of hepatitis B core antibody-positive donors in orthotopic liver transplantation

HYPOTHESIS: Hepatic allografts from donors positive for antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) frequently transmit hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection to recipients. Therefore, most transplantation centers will not use these organs for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Although it is expensive and not always efficacious, hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) has been used routinely for indefinite periods to prevent HBV infection in liver allograft recipients. We assessed the effectiveness of long-term use of a nucleoside analog, lamivudine, in preventing HBV transmission by anti-HBc-positive allografts. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: A tertiary care center. PATIENTS: Twelve patients received hepatic allografts from anti-HBc-positive donors at Loyola University Medical Center, Chicago, between February 23, 1998, and March 13, 2001. INTERVENTION: All patients received 10 000 U/d of intravenous HBIG for 7 days. In addition, they received 300 mg/d of lamivudine in divided doses. Their liver biopsy specimens were tested for HBV DNA, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), and hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb). Serum samples from the donor and recipient were tested for HBcAb, HBV DNA, and hepatitis B surface antibody (HBsAb). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The incidence of HBV infection in recipients who received HBcAb-positive donor livers and lamivudine prophylaxis. RESULTS: All recipients were anti-HBc negative before OLT. Five of the recipients had HBsAb titers greater than 150 U at the time of OLT. Three of the donor livers were HBV DNA positive and 2 were hepatitis B core antigen positive at the time of OLT. Donor serum was HBcAb positive in all 12 donors. None of the recipients have become infected with HBV with a follow-up of 2 to 38 months. CONCLUSION: Perioperative use of HBIG combined with long-term use of lamivudine can prevent HBV infection in recipients who receive hepatic allografts from HBcAb-positive donors.     

Outcomes of liver transplantation in simultaneously hepatitis B surface antigen and hepatitis C virus RNA positive recipients: the deleterious effect of donor hepatitis B core antibody positivity

Background

Recent data from Italian studies have shown excellent results of liver transplantation (LT) in hepatitis B virus (HBV)-infected patients with grafts from hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb)—positive donors, whereas such grafts in hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected recipients have displayed poorer outcomes. We investigated the results of LT with HBcAb-positive grafts in patients with ongoing HBV and HCV coinfections.

Methods

From August 1999 to December 2009, we performed 27 adult primary LTs from deceased heart-beating donors into recipients showing hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)- and HCV-RNA-positivity simultaneously: 12 patients received a graft from an HBsAg-negative HBcAb-positive donor (core+D group) and 15 from an HBcAb-negative donor (core−D group). Immunosuppression included a calcineurin inhibitor, antimetabolite and steroids which were suspended at 6 months. Anti-HBV prophylaxis was always perfomed with anti-HBs immunoglobulins and nucleos(t)idic analogues.

Results

The groups were similar regarding variables of donor, recipient, donor-recipient match, LT procedure, and acute rejection treatment. Median follow-up for surviving grafts was 67 months (range, 16-141). Among all patients, HCV-RNA remained positive after LT. The prevalence of histologically proven recurrent HCV hepatitis was similar in the 2 groups: 83% core+D vs 73% core−D. No recurrent HBV hepatitis occurred during the follow-up. Graft survival at 5 years was significantly lower in the core+D group (core+D 48% vs core−D 87%; P = .018), in which a significantly higher prevalence of graft loss was caused by HCV recurrence (core+D 5/12, 42% vs core−D 1/15, 7%; P = .03). All of the 5 core+D patients who lost their grafts due to HCV recurrence did not receive anti-HCV therapy (4 owing to an aggressive disease and 1 because of patient refusal).

Conclusions

Outcomes of LT in patients with ongoing HBV and HCV coinfection are adversely affected by donor HBcAb positivity, an effect that is mainly mediated by the dismal course of HCV recurrence after LT.