A Research Agenda for Acute Care Services Delivery in Low‐ and Middle‐income Countries

Delivery of acute care services at every level of the health system is essential to ensure appropriate evaluation and management of emergent illness and injury in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs). The health services breakout group at the 2013 Academic Emergency Medicine consensus conference developed recommendations for a research agenda along the following themes: infrastructure, implementation, and sustainable provision of acute care services. Based on these recommendations, a set of priorities was created to promote and guide future research on acute care services.     

The 2005 conference on the biology of manual therapies

A historic and critically important scientific workshop for all professions involved with manual therapies was held at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) on June 9 and 10, 2005. The conference was jointly sponsored and organized by the NIH and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and was the first ever national or international research conference to focus on the biologic mechanisms that underlie a broad range of interventions, which can be described as "manual therapies." Leading scientific experts from North America and Europe presented their latest findings and theories related to 5 different areas of science relevant to manual therapies: neuroscience, biomechanics, endocrinology, imaging, and immunology. During the conference, breakout groups composed of scientists, physicians and therapists, and patient advocates were formed in the relevant disciplines. These groups developed consensus statements on key unanswered research questions, which were then submitted back to the conference for comment and approval. The outcomes of this workshop have subsequently been incorporated into a new initiative by the NIH and Canadian Institutes of Health Research for funding research on the biology of manual therapies. This editorial includes presentation summaries and 13 key consensus recommendations relating to mechanisms of action for manual therapies.     

Violence Prevention in the Emergency Department: Future Research Priorities

The 2009 Academic Emergency Medicine Consensus Conference working group session participants developed recommendations and research questions for violence prevention in the emergency department (ED). A writing group devised a working draft prior to the meeting and presented this to the breakout session at the consensus conference for input and approval. The recommendations include: 1) promote and facilitate the collection of standardized information related to violence victimization and perpetration in ED settings; 2) develop and validate brief practical screening instruments that can identify those at risk for perpetration of violence toward others or toward self; 3) develop and validate brief practical screening instruments that can identify victims at risk for violent reinjury and mental health sequelae; and 4) conduct efficacy, translational, and dissemination research on interventions for violence prevention. The work group emphasized the critical need and role of ED-based research to impact surveillance and prevention of future violence-related injury.     

Electronic Collaboration: Using Technology to Solve Old Problems of Quality Care

The participants of the Electronic Collaboration working group of the 2010 Academic Emergency Medicine consensus conference developed recommendations and research questions for improving regional quality of care through the use of electronic collaboration. A writing group devised a working draft prior to the meeting and presented this to the breakout session at the consensus conference for input and approval. The recommendations include: 1) patient health information should be available electronically across the entire health care delivery system from the 9‐1‐1 call to the emergency department (ED) visit through hospitalization and outpatient care, 2) relevant patient health information should be shared electronically across the entire health care delivery system, 3) Web‐based collaborative technologies should be employed to facilitate patient transfer and timely access to specialists, 4) personal health record adoption should be considered as a way to improve patient health, and 5) any comprehensive reform of regionalization in emergency care must include telemedicine. The workgroup emphasized the need for funding increases so that research in this new and exciting area can expand. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2010; 17:1312–1321 © 2010 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine     

Conceptual Models of Health Behavior: Research in the Emergency Care Settings

This article provides recommendations for incorporating conceptual models of health behavior change into research conducted in emergency care settings. The authors drafted a set of preliminary recommendations, which were reviewed and discussed by a panel of experienced investigators attending the 2009 Academic Emergency Medicine consensus conference. The original recommendations were expanded and refined based on their input. This article reports the final recommendations. Three recommendations were made: 1) research conducted in emergency care settings that focuses on health behaviors should be grounded in formal conceptual models, 2) investigators should clearly operationalize their outcomes of interest, and 3) expected relations between theoretical constructs and outcomes should be made explicit prior to initiating a study. A priori hypothesis generation grounded in conceptual models of health behavior, followed by empirical validation of these hypotheses, is needed to improve preventive and public health–related interventions in emergency care settings.     

American Academy of Nursing Expert Panel on Global Nursing and Health: white paper on Global Nursing And Health.

The American Academy of Nursing's (AAN) Expert Panel on Global Health's white paper examines critical issues in the international nursing arena, including the global shortage of nurses, legal and ethical issues in recruiting international students for nursing positions in developed countries, the nurse faculty shortage, faculty and student exchanges, effects of the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services law, and laws governing new practice within the public domain. Realistic models directed toward viable solutions to these issues are critically needed. It offers 13 recommendations to address issues from a global perspective, including hosting a conference on global nursing, health research, and faculty exchanges; annual meetings; and an international conference of world nurse leaders, the AAN, and Global Panel representatives to discuss this white paper and plan follow-up actions. The final white paper approved by the AAN in 2005 and is published here to stimulate discussion regarding current and future initiatives.     

Patient‐centered Integrated Networks of Emergency Care: Consensus‐based Recommendations and Future Research Priorities

Patient‐centered care is defined by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) as care that is responsive to individual patient needs and values and that guides the treatment decisions. This article is a result of a breakout session of the 2010 Academic Emergency Medicine (AEM) consensus conference and describes the process of developing consensus‐based recommendations for providing patient‐centered emergency care. The objectives of the working group were to identify and describe the critical gaps in the provision of patient‐centered care, develop a consensus‐based research agenda, and create a list of future research priorities. Using e‐mail and in‐person meetings, knowledge gaps were identified in the areas of respect for patient preferences, coordination of clinical care, and communication among health care providers. Four consensus‐based recommendations were developed on the following themes: enhancing communication and patient advocacy in emergency departments (EDs), facilitating care coordination after discharge, defining metrics for patient‐centered care, and placing the locus of control of medical information into patients’ hands. The set of research priorities based on these recommendations was created to promote research and advance knowledge in this dimension of clinical care. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2010; 17:1322–1329 © 2010 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine     

Conceptual models for population-focused public health nursing interventions and outcomes: the state of the art

The conceptual basis of public health nursing (PHN) has evolved particularly over the past three decades. In October 2010, a national research agenda setting conference was held with grant support from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. From the conference, public health nursing intervention models emerged as one of four top priorities. The need for a stronger theoretic base that can guide population-focused nursing practice and research was strongly emphasized. The purpose of this review, in concert with this priority, is to analyze the current status of PHN conceptual models. Based on the review, a set of recommendations is presented related to future conceptual development and testing, with an emphasis on PHN interventions and outcomes. A key recommendation is the refinement of the existing conceptual models with perhaps some consolidation of models, thereby establishing strong grand, middle-range and practice theories that include explicit PHN intervention and outcome components. Another recommendation calls for rigorous comparative analysis and testing. Professional support from the PHN community along with funding agencies will be needed to implement the recommendations related to PHN theory development and testing.     

Report of the National Consensus Conference on Family Presence During Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Procedures.

Representatives from 18 national organizations were convened for a conference to develop recommendations regarding family presence (FP) during pediatric procedures and cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Before the conference, invitees were given a questionnaire and provided with current literature regarding FP. A modified Delphi process was used to develop consensus, including use of multiple questionnaires and breakouts for discussion of specific issues. Participants were encouraged to develop consensus recommendations based on the literature and discussions. Changes in attitude were tracked with repeat questionnaires. Results of the conference were circulated to participants for review and revision. Consensus recommendations include (1) consider FP as an option for families during pediatric procedures and cardiopulmonary resuscitation, (2) offer FP as an option after assessing factors that could adversely affect the interaction, (3) if family is not offered the option for FP, document the reasons why, (4) always consider the safety of the health care team, (5) develop in-hospital transport and transfer policies and procedures for FP, such as family member definition, preparation of the family, handling disagreements, and providing support for the staff, (6) obtain legal review of policies, (7) include education in FP in all core curricula and orientation for health care providers, (8) promote research into best methods for education; effects of FP on patients, family, and staff; best practices for FP; and legal issues regarding FP, among others. These recommendations were approved in concept by the American Academy of Pediatrics and the Ambulatory Pediatrics Association.     

Ethical values in health care: an Indian-Swedish co-operation

The aim of this report is to present an example of a multidisciplinary Indian-Swedish co-operation on ethics in health care. It is based on a conference held in Asia Plateau, Panchgani, Maharasthra, India in 1998. The emphasis is on ethical values that are important for consumers of health care and professionals, and also for different cultures in developed and developing countries. The importance of human dignity is stressed. Sixteen recommendations are given in an appendix.     

Report of the NASPE Policy Conference on Antibradycardia Pacemaker Follow-Up: Effectiveness, Needs, and Resources

On May 4–5, 1993, a policy conference was held in San Diego, California, under the sponsorship of the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology (NASPE) to identify the fundamental goals of antibradycardia pacemaker follow-up, evaluate the effectiveness with which it achieves those goals, and formulate specific recommendations as to how it can be made more effective. The conference addressed clinical, administrative, and educational objectives, focusing on existing and potential resources for follow-up testing and the appropriate frequency of their application. The training of physicians and associated professionals engaged in follow-up also was addressed, as were regulatory and reimbursement issues. This report summarizes the conclusions and recommendations arrived at during the conference and subsequently approved by the NASPE Board of Trustees.     

Results from the International Conference of Experts on Intra-abdominal Hypertension and Abdominal Compartment Syndrome. II. Recommendations

Objective Intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) have been increasingly recognized in the critically ill over the past decade. In the absence of consensus definitions and treatment guidelines the diagnosis and management of IAH and ACS remains variable from institution to institution. Design An international consensus group of multidisciplinary critical care specialists convened at the second World Congress on Abdominal Compartment Syndrome to develop practice guidelines for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of IAH and ACS. Methods Prior to the conference the authors developed a blueprint for consensus definitions and treatment guidelines which were refined both during and after the conference. The present article is the second installment of the final report from the 2004 International ACS Consensus Definitions Conference and is endorsed by the World Society of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome. Results The prevalence and etiological factors for IAH and ACS are reviewed. Evidence-based medicine treatment guidelines are presented to facilitate the diagnosis and management of IAH and ACS. Recommendations to guide future studies are proposed. Conclusions These definitions, guidelines, and recommendations, based upon current best evidence and expert opinion are proposed to assist clinicians in the management of IAH and ACS as well as serve as a reference for future clinical and basic science research.     

National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Standards of Laboratory Practice: recommendations for the use of cardiac markers in coronary artery diseases.

The Sixth Conference on the "Standards of Laboratory Practice Series", sponsored by the National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry (NACB), was held on August 4-5, 1998, at the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Clinical Chemistry, in Chicago, IL. An expert committee was assembled to write recommendations on the use of cardiac markers in coronary artery diseases. The NACB Committee prepared a preliminary draft of the guidelines, made them available on the World Wide Web (www.nacb.org), and distributed them before the presentations. The recommendations were divided into four areas: the use of markers in the triage of patients with chest pain, acute coronary syndromes, clinical applications other than acute myocardial infarction and research, and assay platforms and markers of acute myocardial infarction. The recommendations were revised and subsequently re-presented in part at the "Biomarkers in Acute Cardiac Syndromes Conference", sponsored by the Jewish Hospital Heart and Lung Institute, Louisville KY, on October 16-17, 1998. This report lists each recommendation, its scientific justification, and a summary of discussions from conference participants and reviewers. Approximately 100 individuals responded to various versions of these recommendations via direct correspondences, telephone calls to Committee members, electronic mail correspondence to the Committee Chairman, or oral questions and comments raised during one of the two conference presentations. Some of the recommendations were changed to reflect the consensus opinion. In cases in which there was no consensus, the Committee included pertinent discussion without necessarily changing the original recommendations. At times, the Committee members felt that although a particular recommendation might not be the current standard of care today, they anticipate that it likely will be adopted in the near future.     

Gender‐specific Issues in Traumatic Injury and Resuscitation: Consensus‐based Recommendations for Future Research

Traumatic injury remains an unacceptably high contributor to morbidity and mortality rates across the United States. Gender‐specific research in trauma and emergency resuscitation has become a rising priority. In concert with the 2014 Academic Emergency Medicine consensus conference “Gender‐specific Research in Emergency Care: Investigate, Understand, and Translate How Gender Affects Patient Outcomes,” a consensus‐building group consisting of experts in emergency medicine, critical care, traumatology, anesthesiology, and public health convened to generate research recommendations and priority questions to be answered and thus move the field forward. Nominal group technique was used for the consensus‐building process and a combination of face‐to‐face meetings, monthly conference calls, e‐mail discussions, and preconference surveys were used to refine the research questions. The resulting research agenda focuses on opportunities to improve patient outcomes by expanding research in sex‐ and gender‐specific emergency care in the field of traumatic injury and resuscitation.     

A new multidisciplinary approach to integrating best evidence into musculoskeletal practice

RATIONALE: The effective integration of research evidence into everyday clinical practice continues to be an important challenge. AIMS: The group aimed to answer locally relevant clinical question and produce recommendations for practice based on the best available evidence. METHODS: Through a new initiative, a multidisciplinary group with a specific interest in musculoskeletal disease has been established in order to help address this problem. The group consists of clinical and academic professionals including physiotherapists, occupational therapists, nurses, clinical researchers and information technology librarians representing the health economy. RESULTS: Results from the group's activities are shared locally through presentations and clinical algorithms and nationally through conference presentations and the National Electronic Library for Health. CONCLUSION: As well as clinical recommendations, other benefits of the group have been improved networking, enhanced continual professional development and identifying areas in need of further research.     

A critique of the ACCP consensus conference on mechanical ventilation. American College of Chest Physicians

The American College of Chest Physicians recently published a statement summarizing the results of the Consensus Conference on Mechanical Ventilation (Chest 1993; 104:1833-1859). In this statement, the physiology of mechanical ventilation was extensively reviewed, and 5 principles and 38 guidelines or recommendations on which consensus was reached were presented. The following critique (1) summarizes the findings of the conference; (2) comments on selected principles, recommendations, and physiological concepts presented in the statement; and (3) discusses the strengths and the limitations of the consensus conference format, as well as the errors and biases inherent in the policy-making process. The Consensus Conference statement is one of the clearest, most complete reviews of physiology and techniques of mechanical ventilation I have yet encountered. The suggested guidelines and recommendations clearly follow from the physiological principles discussed. Unfortunately, numerous problems with the consensus conference format and the almost total lack of controlled randomized studies limit the confidence with which these suggestions can be accepted. Our experts in respiratory care are remiss for not providing outcome-based or preference-based data, and the pulmonary and critical care community is remiss for not demanding that they do so before changing our approaches on the basis of their suggestions.     

The National EMS Research Strategic Plan

One of the eight major recommendations put forth by the National EMS Research Agenda Implementation Project in 2002 was the development of an emergency medical services (EMS) research strategic plan. Using a modified Delphi technique along with a consensus conference approach, a strategic plan for EMS research was created. The plan includes recommendations for concentrating efforts by EMS researchers, policy makers, andfunding resources with the ultimate goal of improving clinical outcomes. Clinical issues targeted for additional research efforts include evaluation andtreatment of patients with asthma, acute cardiac ischemia, circulatory shock, major injury, pain, acute stroke, andtraumatic brain injury. The plan calls for developing, evaluating, andvalidating improved measurement tools andtechniques. Additional research to improve the education of EMS personnel as well as system design andoperation is also suggested. Implementation of the EMS research strategic plan will improve both the delivery of services andthe care of individuals who access the emergency medical system.     

The Emergency Physician and Knowledge Transfer: Continuing Medical Education, Continuing Professional Development, and Self-improvement

A workshop session from the 2007 Academic Emergency Medicine Consensus Conference, Knowledge Translation in Emergency Medicine: Establishing a Research Agenda and Guide Map for Evidence Uptake, focused on developing a research agenda for continuing medical education (CME) in knowledge transfer. Based on quasi-Delphi methodology at the conference session, and subsequent electronic discussion and refinement, the following recommendations are made: 1) Adaptable tools should be developed, validated, and psychometrically tested for needs assessment. 2) "Point of care" learning within a clinical context should be evaluated as a tool for practice changes and improved knowledge transfer. 3) The addition of a CME component to technological platforms, such as search engines and databases, simulation technology, and clinical decision-support systems, may help knowledge transfer for clinicians or increase utilization of these tools and should, therefore, be evaluated. 4) Further research should focus on identifying the appropriate outcomes for physician CME. Emergency medicine researchers should transition from previous media-comparison research agendas to a more rigorous qualitative focus that takes into account needs assessment, instructional design, implementation, provider change, and care change. 5) In the setting of continued physician learning, barriers to the subsequent implementation of knowledge transfer and behavioral changes of physicians should be elicited through research.     

Neurobiological correlates of acupuncture: November 17-18, 2005

The "Neurobiological Correlates of Acupuncture" Conference was convened November 17-18, 2005 in Bethesda, Maryland. The conference was sponsored by the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). Its goals were to encourage exchange of ideas regarding the direction of neuroimaging in acupuncture research as well as to discuss some of the challenges in this field. The use of neuroimaging, a relatively recent advance in the study of acupuncture, holds the promise of localizing and characterizing brain activity associated with acupuncture interventions in real time and in a minimally invasive way. Among the main challenges to research into the biological mechanisms of acupuncture are the multiple treatment variables and the difficulties of selecting appropriate experimental controls. Despite these challenges, numerous findings from acupuncture neuroimaging experiments were presented and discussed at the conference on topics related to possible signaling networks, sham acupuncture controls, acupoint specificity, acupuncture analgesia, acupuncture-associated brain response, and the potential for using neuroimaging in conjunction with translational and clinical acupuncture research. Future directions in acupuncture neuroimaging research, as recommended by conference participants, should focus on (1) continuing exploration of acupuncture signaling networks; (2) establishing standards and recommendations for performing and reporting acupuncture neuroimaging results; (3) enabling data sharing in the acupuncture neuroimaging community; (4) gaining a better understanding of placebo and control groups in acupuncture neuroimaging experiments; and (5) developing biomarkers that relate to physiologically and/or clinically relevant acupuncture responses to neuroimaging results.     

Using consensus methods to develop clinical practice guidelines for intensive care: The Intensive Care Collaborative project

BACKGROUND: Clinical practices or procedures based on the best available evidence are an essential resource within an intensive care unit (ICU). Maintaining the currency of a local clinical practice manual is challenging however, particularly in relation to the time required, other workload pressures and the availability of staff with relevant skills to interrogate the literature. The aim of the Intensive Care Collaborative (ICC) project was to use the synergism of group processes to develop state-based clinical guidelines for six common intensive care practices - eye care, oral care, endotracheal tube management, suctioning, arterial line management, and central venous catheter (CVC) management. METHODS: Participants were 55 senior nurse clinicians from all nine area health services in NSW, seven academic facilitators, and staff from the Intensive Care Coordination and Monitoring Unit (ICCMU). A range of approaches were used to develop the six clinical practice guidelines (CPG) and related systematic literature reviews, including a preparatory educational seminar for participants, formation of working groups of clinicians, with subsequent teleconferences, e-mail and online forums to identify the scope of each guideline and review the literature. A consensus development conference (CDC) was conducted to finalise the reviews with a nominal group technique (NGT) used to develop recommendations for practice. External Validation Panels (EVP) verified the recommendations in each clinical practice guideline. Group voting was undertaken using a Likert scale (1-3 disagree, 4-6 neutral, 7-9 agree) with consensus agreement set as a median of at least seven. RESULTS: Eighty-three recommendations for practice were developed for the six Clinical Practice Guidelines; 50% were based on research literature evidence (23% with high levels of evidence). The balance were based on consensus opinion of the panel members. Only five recommendations were not validated by external validation. CONCLUSION: This project has demonstrated a method for guideline development that is robust, incorporating evidence from research and clinical expertise utilising an objective egalitarian framework.