Vancomycin-induced linear IgA bullous disease presenting as toxic epidermal necrolysis

Linear IgA bullous dermatosis (LABD) is a rare autoimmune vesiculobullous disorder characterized by variable clinical presentations that may mimic bullous pemphigoid, dermatitis herpetiformis, cicatricial pemphigoid and erythema multiforme. A few cases of drug-induced LABD that clinically resembled toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) have been reported. A subset of patients with LABD have been found to be drug-induced; the most common drug being vancomycin. The diagnosis of LABD is confirmed by the presence of a linear band of IgA along the basement membrane zone on direct immunofluorescence microscopy. We report a case of a 77-year-old man who presented to us with vancomycin-induced LABD that presented clinically as TEN. He had a complete recovery over a 3-week period following discontinuation of the vancomycin and the addition of oral dapsone therapy. It is important to be aware that drug-induced LABD can mimic TEN.     

Severe Stevens‐Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis overlap syndrome—beyond skin involvement

Stevens–Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are rare but serious dermatologic diseases with many potential multisystem complications. We describe the case of an 8‐year‐old girl who developed severe SJS/TEN overlap syndrome (25% of her body surface area was affected) complicated by pancreatitis and bronchiolitis obliterans. These rare complications emphasize the need for careful, intensive monitoring of possible complications and an interdisciplinary team approach to provide optimal treatment and follow‐up.     

Erythema multiforme,Stevens‐Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis – diagnosis and treatment

Prior to the first international consensus classification published in 1993, the clinical distinction between erythema multiforme (EM), Stevens‐Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) had been subject to uncertainty and controversy for more than a century. Based on this classification, the three conditions are defined by the morphology of the individual lesions and their pattern of distribution. Etiopathogenetically, the majority of EM cases is caused by infections (primarily herpes simplex virus and Mycoplasma pneumoniae), whereas SJS/TEN are predominantly triggered by drugs. The SCORTEN (score of toxic epidermal necrolysis) can and should be used to assess disease prognosis in patients with SJS/TEN. While supportive treatment is generally considered sufficient for EM, there is still uncertainty as to the type of systemic therapy required for SJS/TEN. Given the lack of high‐quality therapeutic trials and (in some cases) conflicting results, it is currently impossible to issue definitive recommendations for any given immunomodulatory therapy. While there is always a trade‐off between rapid onset of treatment‐induced immunosuppression and an uptick in infection risk, there has been increasing evidence that cyclosporine in particular may be able to halt disease progression (i.e. skin detachment) and lower mortality rates. Assistance in diagnosis and management of the aforementioned conditions may be obtained from the Center for the Documentation of Severe Skin Reactions (dZh) at the Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany.     

Phenytoin-induced linear IgA dermatosis mimicking toxic epidermal necrolysis

A 60-year-old woman developed a severe widespread blistering eruption that also involved the palms and soles, but spared the mucosae, approximately 7 days after starting phenytoin. Phenytoin was commenced postoperatively after a craniotomy resection of a glioblastoma multiforme. The clinical features resembled that seen in toxic epidermal necrolysis. However, the patient was systemically well and the histology and immunofluorescence revealed linear IgA dermatosis. The skin lesions began to slowly heal 2 weeks after discontinuation of the phenytoin.     

Prognosis of generalized bullous fixed drug eruption: comparison with Stevens–Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis

Background Generalized bullous fixed drug eruption (GBFDE) is a rare cutaneous adverse reaction to drugs, and may resemble Stevens–Johnson syndrome (SJS) or toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), but is usually considered less severe. Objectives To compare the severity and mortality rate in cases of GBFDE and control cases of SJS or TEN of similar extent of skin detachment. Methods This was a case–control analysis of 58 patients with GBFDE matched by age and extent of skin detachment to 170 control patients with a validated diagnosis of SJS or SJS/TEN overlap. Data for cases and controls were extracted from the EuroSCAR and RegiSCAR databases resulting from two population‐based studies of severe cutaneous adverse reactions conducted in Europe. Preselected outcome criteria were death (primary), and fever, duration of hospitalization and transfer to an intensive care or burn unit (secondary). Results GBFDE affected mainly older patients (median age 78 years, interquartile range 68–84 years); 13 of 58 cases died (22%). The mortality rate was slightly but not significantly lower for patients with GBFDE than controls [28%, multivariate odds ratio 0·6 (95% confidence interval 0·30–1·4)]. Patients with GBFDE and controls did not differ in other preselected criteria for severity. Conclusions Although our study featured limited statistical power, we were not able to confirm that GBFDE had better prognosis than SJS or SJS/TEN of similar disease extent in older patients. Severe cases of GBFDE deserve the attention and active management given to patients with SJS or TEN.     

Open trial of ciclosporin treatment for Stevens–Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis

Background Stevens–Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are acute mucocutaneous reactions associated with poor prognosis. The treatment is mainly symptomatic, based on supportive care. Until now, several curative treatments have been proposed without evidence of effectiveness. Objectives To evaluate the effect of ciclosporin on SJS and TEN after a short series had suggested a benefit. Methods We conducted an open, phase II trial to determine the safety and possible benefit of ciclosporin. Among the 45 consecutive patients admitted for SJS/TEN from March 2005 to September 2007, 29 fulfilled inclusion criteria. Ciclosporin was administered orally (3 mg kg^?1 daily for 10 days) and tapered over a month. Clinical and biological evaluations were performed sequentially. Predicted death rate was estimated with a validated prognostic score (SCORTEN). Results Twenty‐nine patients were included at a mean ± SD of 2·8 ± 1·8 days after onset. The final diagnosis was SJS (n = 10), SJS/TEN overlap (n = 12) and TEN (n = 7). One month of treatment was completed in 26. Ciclosporin was stopped after more than 10 days in three cases for side‐effects including posterior leucoencephalopathy (n = 1), neutropenia (n = 1) and nosocomial pneumopathy (n = 1). Ciclosporin dosage was tapered earlier than scheduled in two cases for alteration in renal function. The prognostic score predicted 2·75 deaths; none occurred (P = 0·1). Mean epidermal detachment remained stable in 18 of 29 cases (62%). The mean ± SD hospital stay was 16·2 ± 9·1 days. Conclusions Both the death rate and the progression of detachment seemed lower than expected, suggesting a possible usefulness of ciclosporin in SJS and TEN that needs to be confirmed.     

Efficacy and safety of cyclosporine in Stevens–Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis

Stevens–Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are rare but life threatening cutaneous reactions that are most commonly caused by exposure to medications. This review assesses the efficacy and safety of cyclosporine therapy for SJS, TEN, and SJS/TEN overlap. A literature review was conducted in PubMed using the MeSH terms TEN, SJS, and cyclosporine. Five case series and one meta‐analysis were analyzed. From review of the existing literature, cyclosporine appears to not only have a mortality benefit in the treatment of SJS/TEN, but also a relatively safe side effect profile.