Fractionated total body irradiation and allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for standard risk leukemia

From March 1982 to December 1986, 32 patients with standard risk leukaemia were conditioned for allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) with low dose fractionated total body irradiation (TBI) after infusion of alkylating agents. This series includes six children and 26 adults. Minimal follow-up was 24 months. The total dose of 11 Gy, given in 5 daily fractions of 2.20 Gy, was given in the lateral position, following chemotherapy with either melphalan or cyclophosphamide. Lungs were shielded for 2 out of the 5 fractions. All patients had in vivo dosimetry. The death rate is 25% without relapse or rejection. Disease-free survival is 73% at 5 years. Toxic deaths are detailed: 2 from sepsis and veino-occlusive disease of the liver, 3 from severe graft versus host disease (GVHD), 2 from GVHD associated with virus pneumonitis and one from HIV infection. Fractionated low dose rate TBI is discussed regarding its decreased toxicity and its efficiency for disease control.     

‘Boomerang’ technique: An improved method for conformal treatment of locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer

The primary aim of the present study was to assess radiation dosimetry and subsequent clinical outcomes in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer using a novel radiation technique termed the ‘Boomerang’. Dosimetric comparisons were made with both conventional and intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) techniques. This is a study of 22 patients treated with this technique from June 1995 to October 1998. The technique used entailed delivery of 36 Gy in 18 fractions via parallel opposed fields, then 24 Gy in 12 fractions via asymmetric rotating arc fields for a total of 60 Gy in 30 fractions. Patients also received induction and concurrent chemotherapy. The radiation dosimetry was excellent. Dose?volume histograms showed that with the arc fields, 90% of the planning target volume received 94% of the prescribed dose. Relative to other conventional radiation therapy off‐cord techniques, the Boomerang technique results in a 27% greater proportion of the prescribed dose being received by 90% of the planning target volume. This translates into an overall 10% greater dose received for the same prescribed dose. At 3 years, the actuarial loco‐regional control rate, the failure‐free survival rate and the overall survival rate were 91, 75 and 91%, respectively. At 5 years, the actuarial loco‐regional control rate, the failure‐free survival rate and the overall survival rate were 74, 62 and 71%, respectively. The Boomerang technique provided excellent radiation dosimetry with correspondingly good loco‐regional control rates (in conjunction with chemotherapy) and very acceptable acute and late toxicity profiles. Because treatment can be delivered with conventional standard treatment planning and delivery systems, it is a validated treatment option for centres that do not have the capability or capacity for IMRT. A derivative of the Boomerang technique, excluding the parallel opposed component, is now our standard for patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer when IMRT is not available.     

In-vivo dosimetry by diode semiconductors in combination with portal films during TBI: reporting a 5-year clinical experience.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In-vivo dosimetry is vital to assure an accurate delivery of total body irradiation (TBI). In-vivo lung dosimetry is strongly recommended because of the risk of radiation-induced interstitial pneumonia (IP). Here we report on our 5-year experience with in-vivo dosimetry using diodes in combination with portal films and assessing the effectiveness of in-vivo dosimetry in improving the accuracy of the treatment. Moreover, we wished to investigate in detail the possibility of in-vivo portal dosimetry to yield individual information on the lung dose and to evaluate the impact of CT planning on the correspondence between stated and in-vivo measured doses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From March 1994 to March 1999, 229 supine-positioned patients were treated at our Institute with TBI, using a 6 MV X-rays opposed lateral beam technique. 146 patients received 10 Gy given in three fractions, once a day (FTBI), shielding the lungs by the arms; 70 received 12-13.2 Gy, given in 6-11 fractions, 2-3 fractions per day (HFTBI): in this case about 2/3 of the lungs were shielded by moulded blocks (mean shielded lung dose equal to 9 or 9.5 Gy). Thirteen patients received 8 Gy given in a single fraction (SFTBI, lung dose: 7 Gy). For all HFTBI and FTBI patients, midline in-vivo dosimetry was performed at the first fraction by positioning two diodes pairs (one at entrance and one at the exit side) at the waist (umbilicus) and at the pelvis (ankles). If at least one of the two diodes doses (waist-pelvis) was outside +/-5% from the prescribed dose, actions could be initiated, together with possible checks on the following fractions. Transit dosimetry by portal films was performed for most patients; for 165 of them (117 and 48, respectively for FTBI and HFTBI) the midline in-vivo dose distribution of the chest region was derived and mean lung dose assessed. As a CT plan was performed for all HFTBI patients, for these patients, the lung dose measured by portal in-vivo dosimetry was compared with the expected value. RESULTS: Concerning all diodes data, 528 measurements were available: when excluding the data of the first fraction(s) of the patients undergoing corrections (n = 392), mean and SD were respectively 0.0% and 4.5% (FTBI: -0.3 +/- 4.8%; HFTBI: 0.4 +/- 3.9%). In total 105/229 patients had a change after the first fraction and 66/229 were controlled by in-vivo dosimetry for more than one fraction. Since January 1998 a CT plan is performed for FTBI patients too: when comparing the diodes data before and after this date, a significant improvement was found (i.e. rate of deviations larger than 5% respectively equal to 30.7% and 13.1%, P = 0.007). When considering only the patients with a CT plan, the global SD reduced to 3.5%. Concerning transit dosimetry data, for FTBI, the mean (midline) lung dose was found to vary significantly from patient to patient (Average 9.13 +/- 0.81 Gy; range 7.4-11.4 Gy); for the HFTBI patients the mean deviation between measured and expected lung dose was 0.0% (1 SD = 3.8%). CONCLUSIONS: In vivo dosimetry is an effective tool to improve the accuracy of TBI. The impact of CT planning for FTBI significantly improved the accuracy of the treatment delivery. Transit dosimetry data revealed a significant inter-patient variation of the mean lung dose among patients undergoing the same irradiation technique. For patients with partial lung shielding (HFTBI), an excellent agreement between measured and expected lung dose was verified.     

Total body irradiation using helical tomotherapy: Set-up experience and in-vivo dosimetric evaluation

PurposeHelical Tomotherapy (HT) appears as a valuable technique for total body irradiation (TBI) to create highly homogeneous and conformal dose distributions with more precise repositioning than conventional TBI techniques. The aim of this work is to describe the technique implementation, including treatment preparation, planning and dosimetric monitoring of TBI delivered in our institution from October 2016 to March 2019.Material and methodPrior to patient care, irradiation protocol was set up using physical phantoms. Gafchromic films were used to assess dose distribution homogeneity and evaluate imprecise patient positioning impact. Sixteen patients’ irradiations with a prescribed dose of 12 Gy were delivered in 6 fractions of 2 Gy over 3 days. Pre-treatment quality assurance (QA) was performed for the verification of dose distributions at selected positions. In addition, in-vivo dosimetry was carried out using optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLD).ResultsPlanning evaluation, as well as results of pre-treatment verifications, are presented. In-vivo dosimetry showed the strong consistency of OSLD measured doses. OSLD mean relative dose differences between measurement and calculation were respectively +0,96% and ?2% for armpit and hands locations, suggesting better reliability for armpit OSLD positioning. Repercussion of both longitudinal and transversal positioning inaccuracies on phantoms is depicted up to 2 cm shifts.ConclusionThe full methodology to set up TBI protocol, as well as dosimetric evaluation and pre-treatment QA, were presented. Our investigations reveal strong correspondence between planned and delivered doses shedding light on the dose reliability of OSLD for HT based TBI in-vivo dosimetry.     

Long-term outcome after static intensity-modulated total body radiotherapy using compensators stratified by pediatric and adult cohorts

PURPOSE: To report the long-term outcome after total body irradiation with intensity-modulating compensators and allogeneic/autologous transplantation, especially in terms of therapy-related toxicity in pediatric and adult cohorts. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 257 consecutive patients (40 children and 217 adults) have been treated since 1983 with TBI using static intensity-modulated radiotherapy for hematologic malignancies. The total dose of 12 Gy was applied in six fractions within 3 days before allogeneic (n = 174) or autologous (n = 83) transplantation. The median follow-up was 9.2 years. RESULTS: The 5-year overall survival rate was 47.9% (49.8% for the adults and 37.5% for the children, p = 0.171). The 5-year tumor-related mortality rate was 23%, and the 5-year treatment-related mortality rate 29.2% (29.5% in the adults and 27.5% in the pediatric patients). Interstitial pneumonitis developed in 28 (10.9%) of 257 patients and in 12.5% of the pediatric cohort. The interstitial pneumonitis rate was 25% in pediatric patients treated with a 12-Gy lung dose compared with 4.2% for those treated to an 11-Gy lung dose. The overall survival rate stratified by lung dose was 26.7% for 12 Gy and 52.4% for 11 Gy (p = 0.001). The incidence of veno-occlusive disease and cataract was 5.8% and 6.6% in all patients and 12.5% and 15% in the pediatric patients, respectively (p < 0.05). Secondary malignancies were found in 4.3% of all patients, all in the adult cohort at transplantation. CONCLUSION: Static intensity-modulated total body irradiation with a total dose of 12 Gy before allogeneic/autologous transplantation is a successful treatment with good long-term outcome and acceptable therapy-related toxicities. Constraining the lung dose to 11 Gy substantially lowered the actuarial treatment-related mortality. This effect was especially striking in the pediatric patients.     

Biological dosimetry after total body irradiation (TBI) for hematologic malignancy patients

PURPOSE: Biological dosimetry based on scoring chromosomal aberrations in peripheral lymphocytes was compared to physical dosimetry done for total body irradiation (TBI) before bone marrow transplantation (BMT) in patients with hematologic malignancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients undergoing TBI were included in the study. A total dose of 12 Gy in 2.5 days was fractionated into 2 or 3 daily doses of 1.8 Gy delivered by a 18 MV linear accelerator (dose rate: 15.8 cGy x min(-1)). Blood samples were obtained from patients before irradiation and after the first fraction of 1.8 Gy. A standard dose-effect curve was established by in vitro irradiation of healthy volunteer lymphocytes. Chromosomal aberrations were scored by the conventional cytogenetics (CCG) method for unstable anomalies and by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) for stable anomalies. RESULTS: Healthy donor lymphocytes before irradiation yielded 0.1% dicentrics and 0.3% translocations of chromosome 4 (Chr. 4), that is 2.5% for the whole genome. Patients before irradiation had 2% of dicentrics and 1.1% of chromosome 4 translocations. The biologically estimated dose of the 15 patients after exposure to 1.8 Gy was 1.93 Gy (95% CI: 1.85-2.05) according to CCG, and 2.06 Gy (95% CI: 1.75-2.15) by FISH. CONCLUSION: The dose estimated by biological dosimetry, in this case of homogeneously distributed radiation of TBI agrees well with the absorbed radiation dose calculated by physical dosimetry.     

Single dose versus hyperfractionated total body irradiation before allogeneic bone marrow transplantation: a non-randomized comparative study of 54 patients at the Institut Gustave-Roussy

At the Institut Gustave-Roussy (IGR), from January 1982 to December 1986, 54 patients received total body irradiation (TBI) as a part of the conditioning regimen before allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. The patients were non-randomly assigned to either single dose TBI (STBI) (31 patients receiving 10 Gy at a 4.5 cGy/min dose rate, 8 Gy to the lungs) or to a hyperfractionated scheme (HTBI) (23 patients receiving 13.2 Gy in 11 fractions, 3 fractions per day, 9 Gy to the lungs). Relapse rate and overall survival were not significantly different in the two STBI and HTBI groups, in spite of a larger number of 2nd and 3rd remission patients in the HTBI subset. The incidence of interstitial pneumonitis (IP) was significantly reduced in the HTBI group (13%, versus 45% after STBI, p = 0.02). Lethality by IP was also lower after HTBI (4%, versus 26% after STBI, p = 0.08). There was no case of veno-occlusive disease of the liver in the HTBI group, whereas three cases were observed after STBI. Based on these results, the IGR activated, in January 1987, a randomized trial comparing the single dose 10 Gy TBI (8 Gy to the lung) to a new hyperfractionated schedule (11 fractions of 1.35 Gy, 3 fractions per day, 9 Gy to the lungs).     

容积旋转调强技术在全身放疗中运用的可行性研究

目的 探讨容积旋转调强技术（VMAT）应用于全身放疗（TBI）的剂量学特点,为临床应用提供技术参考。方法选取2012年8月至2015年1月于南京明基医院接受包含TBI清髓预处理方案的恶性血液系统疾病患者15例,采用瓦里安Eclipse 10.0计划系统,单弧360°多中心衔接的方法制定VMAT计划,处方剂量12 Gy／6f。通过分析剂量体积直方图（DVH）曲线,评估靶区、危及器官的剂量分布;通过估计治疗计划的总机器跳数、出束时间以及总治疗时间来评估计划的实施效率;最后采用MatrixX二维电离室矩阵进行剂量验证。结果 15例患者TBI计划的平均总机器跳数为（2308±210.7） MU,剂量率约400 cGy／min,计划平均实施时间为30 min。靶区平均剂量 （Dmean）为（12.58±0.45） Gy,最小剂量（Dmin）为（11.27±0.13） Gy,最大剂量（Dmax）为（15.35±0.65） Gy,并且危及器官受量较低。结论 在TBI治疗中,运用VMAT技术可以获得良好的靶区剂量均匀性及计划实施效率,同时正常组织受量较低,因此有着较好的临床应用价值。     

造血干细胞移植前全身照射的毒副反应及影响因素分析

目的　观察和分析造血干细胞移植前采用全身照射治疗所产生的近期和晚期毒副反应。方法　自１９９９年５月至２００５年１２月,我科对３１２例造血干细胞移植患者进行了全身照射。采用６０Ｃｏγ射线照射,患者取侧卧体位,腹脐处中心平面剂量率控制在４～６ｃＧｙ／ｍｉｎ,平均（５.２±１.１３）ｃＧｙ／ｍｉｎ,总剂量７～１２Ｇｙ,分１～３次照射,每天照射１次,照射期间制作个体化的肺挡铅进行肺屏蔽。结果　在全身照射后,患者近期出现了Ⅰ ～Ⅱ级的发热、胃肠道反应、口腔炎及出血性膀胱炎,均可耐受,无需特殊处理。间质性肺炎发生率为９.９％,造血系统重建和干细胞植活率达７０％以上,患者均未出现严重的肾功能衰竭。结论　采用剂量率５ｃＧｙ／ｍｉｎ照射,总照射剂量控制在７～１２Ｇｙ,肺中位剂量不超过７.５Ｇｙ,１次／天,共照射１～３次的剂量分割模式,是有效和安全的造血干细胞移植预处理方案。     

Validation de la dosimétrie biologique chez des patients conditionnés par irradiation corporelle totale : étude cytogénétique conventionnelle et hybridation in situ (FISH)Validation of biological dosimetry versus physical dosimetry in conditioned patients using total body irradiation: cytogenetics and FISH study.

Purpose. – Validation of biological dosimetry versus physical dosimetry in malignant haemopathy patients conditioned by total body irradiation (TBI) before bone marrow transplantation (BMT).Patients and methods. – The scoring of chromosomal aberrations in peripheral lymphocytes irradiated in vivo was used to perform the biological dosimetry. The data were compared to those obtained with healthy volunteers' total blood exposed to in vitro irradiation with linear accelerator doses (0.2, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 Gy) for dose-response curves. In experimental animal models, can in vivo and in vitro responses be considered as being the same? All the published human data are based on retrospective dose evaluation with very large uncertainties on the dose precisely delivered to the subject. TBI before BMT was taken as a model where the dose calculation results from the physical method, with homogeneous beam and dose delivered precisely along the entire organism. In vivo response allows us to validate biological dosimetry in 15 adult patients (female + male), before (D = 0 Gy) and after the first fraction of 1.8 Gy, delivered by a linear accelerator (18 MV, dose-rate of 15.8 cGy/min^–1). Two methods, conventional cytogenetics (CCG) and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH painting) of chromosome 4 were respectively used to analyze the unstable chromosome aberrations and stable chromosome aberrations.Results. – Healthy volunteer lymphocytes, before irradiation, yielded 0.1% dicentrics and 0.3% translocations of chromosome 4, with 2.5% for the whole genome. Patients before irradiation had 2% dicentrics and 11.48% chromosome 4 translocations for the whole genome. In the 15 patients, for a physical dose of 1.8 Gy, the evaluated biological dose was 1.93 Gy (95% CI: 1.85–2.05 Gy) with conventional cytogenetics and 2.06 Gy (95% CI: 1.75–2.15 Gy) with FISH.Conclusion. – These results, in which the biologically estimated dose is in complete agreement with the dose calculated by physical dosimetry in the homogeneous irradiation model, suggest the validation of biological dosimetry in TBI conditioning.     

Dose response and factors related to interstitial pneumonitis after bone marrow transplant

PURPOSE: Total body irradiation (TBI) and chemotherapy are common components of conditioning regimens for bone marrow transplantation. Interstitial pneumonitis (IP) is a known regimen-related complication. Using published data of IP in a multivariate logistic regression, this study sought to identify the parameters in the bone marrow transplantation conditioning regimen that were significantly associated with IP and to establish a radiation dose-response function. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective review was conducted of articles that reported IP incidence along with lung dose, fractionation, dose rate, and chemotherapy regimen. In the final analysis, 20 articles (n = 1090 patients), consisting of 26 distinct TBI/chemotherapy regimens, were included in the analysis. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to determine dosimetric and chemotherapeutic factors that influenced the incidence of IP. RESULTS: A logistic model was generated from patients receiving daily fractions of radiation. In this model, lung dose, cyclophosphamide dose, and the addition of busulfan were significantly associated with IP. An incidence of 3%-4% with chemotherapy-only conditioning regimens is estimated from the models. The alpha/beta value of the linear-quadratic model was estimated to be 2.8 Gy. The dose eliciting a 50% incidence, D50, for IP after 120 mg/kg of cyclophosphamide was 8.8 Gy; in the absence of chemotherapy, the estimated D50 is 10.6 Gy. No dose rate effect was observed. The use of busulfan as a substitute for radiation is equivalent to treating with 14.8 Gy in 4 fractions with 50% transmission blocks shielding the lung. The logistic regression failed to find a model that adequately fit the multiple-fraction-per-day data. CONCLUSIONS: Dose responses for both lung radiation dose and cyclophosphamide dose were identified. A conditioning regimen of 12 Gy TBI in 6 daily fractions induces an IP incidence of about 11% in the absence of lung shielding. Shielding the lung to receive 50% of this dose lowers the estimated incidence to about 2.3%. Because the lungs can be adequately shielded, we recommend against using busulfan as a substitute for fractionated TBI with cyclophosphamide.     

Total body irradiation in bone marrow transplantation: fractionated vs single dose. Acute toxicity and preliminary results

The usefulness of total body irradiation (TBI) plus chemotherapy as a preparative regimen prior to bone marrow transplantation has been widely documented. However, the procedure can be highly toxic. Fractionated and low dose rate TBI has been said to enhance therapeutic ratio by increasing normal tissue tolerance and increasing leukemic cell kill. We report here the acute toxic effects and preliminary results on 2 consecutively groups of patients, treated with bone marrow transplantation (BMT) for leukemia or multiple myeloma, and conditioned by 2 TBI regimens. Group A patients received 10 Gy-Co-60 single dose of TBI plus 120 mg/kg of cyclophosphamide over a period of 2 days (8 Gy lungs). Group B received 12 Gy Co-60 of TBI in 6 fractions (2/day), (8 Gy lungs) plus 120 mg/kg of cyclophosphamide over a period of 3 days. The acute toxic effects recorded were similar in both groups. Only a 40% vs 0% (P = 0.02) incidence of parotiditis in groups A and B favors fractionation. Other results obtained to date are as follows: an incidence of interstitial pneumonitis of 39% and 31% (ns); relapses of 10% and 20% (ns), and mortality of 55% and 60% for each group respectively. An interesting finding was that IP was associated with acute grade II-IV graft vs host disease in 87% and 100% of cases of group A and B, respectively. We conclude that fractionated TBI is at least as effective as single dose TBI as a conditioning regimen; however, only randomized trials would allow definitive conclusions.     

Dosimetric feasibility of hypofractionated proton radiotherapy for neoadjuvant pancreatic cancer treatment

PURPOSE: To evaluate tumor and normal tissue dosimetry of a 5 cobalt gray equivalent (CGE) x 5 fraction proton radiotherapy schedule, before initiating a clinical trial of neoadjuvant, short-course proton radiotherapy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The first 9 pancreatic cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant intensity-modulated radiotherapy (1.8 Gy x 28) at the Massachusetts General Hospital had treatment plans generated using a 5 CGE x 5 fraction proton regimen. To facilitate dosimetric comparisons, clinical target volumes and normal tissue volumes were held constant. Plans were optimized for target volume coverage and normal tissue sparing. RESULTS: Hypofractionated proton and conventionally fractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy plans both provided acceptable target volume coverage and dose homogeneity. Improved dose conformality provided by the hypofractionated proton regimen resulted in significant sparing of kidneys, liver, and small bowel, evidenced by significant reductions in the mean doses, expressed as percentage prescribed dose, to these structures. Kidney and liver sparing was most evident in low-dose regions (< or =20% prescribed dose for both kidneys and < or =60% prescribed dose for liver). Improvements in small-bowel dosimetry were observed in high- and low-dose regions. Mean stomach and duodenum doses, expressed as percentage prescribed dose, were similar for the two techniques. CONCLUSIONS: A proton radiotherapy schedule consisting of 5 fractions of 5 CGE as part of neoadjuvant therapy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas seems dosimetrically feasible, providing excellent target volume coverage, dose homogeneity, and normal tissue sparing. Hypofractionated proton radiotherapy in this setting merits Phase I clinical trial investigation.     

Smart (simultaneous modulated accelerated radiation therapy) boost: a new accelerated fractionation schedule for the treatment of head and neck cancer with intensity modulated radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: To report the initial experience in the definitive treatment of head and neck carcinomas using SMART (Simultaneous Modulated Accelerated Radiation Therapy) boost technique. Radiation was delivered via IMRT (Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy). The following parameters were evaluated: acute toxicity, initial tumor response, clinical feasibility, dosimetry and cost. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between January 1996 and December 1997, 20 patients with primary head and neck carcinomas were treated with SMART boost technique. The treatment fields encompassed two simultaneous targets. The primary target included palpable and visible disease sites. The secondary target included regions at risk for microscopic disease. Daily fractions of 2.4 Gy and 2 Gy were prescribed and delivered to the primary and secondary targets to a total dose of 60 Gy and 50 Gy, respectively. Lower neck nodes were treated with a single conventional anterior portal. This fractionation schedule was completed in 5 weeks with 5 daily fractions weekly. Toxicity was evaluated by RTOG acute toxicity grading criteria, evidence of infection at immobilization screw sites, subjective salivary function, weight loss, and the need for treatment split. Mean follow-up was 15.2 months. Initial tumor response was assessed by clinical and radiographical examinations. Clinical feasibility was evaluated by the criteria: time to treat patient, immobilization, and treatment planning and QA time. In dosimetry, we evaluated the mean doses of both targets and normal tissues and percent targets' volume below goal. To evaluate cost, Medicare allowable charge for SMART boost was compared to those of conventional fractionated and accelerated radiotherapy. RESULTS: ACUTE TOXICITY: None of the patients had a screw site infection and all patients healed well after completion of radiotherapy. Sixteen of 20 patients (80%) completed the treatment within 40 days without any split. Sixteen patients (80%) had RTOG Grade 3 mucositis while 10 patients (50%) had Grade 3 pharyngitis. Three of 20 patients (15%) had weight loss greater than 10% of their pretreatment weight. Ten patients (50%) required intravenous fluids, tube feeding or both. Nine patients (45%) reported moderate xerostomia with significant relief reported within 6 months. INITIAL TUMOR RESPONSE: 19 patients (95 %) had complete response (CR) while one had partial response (PR). The patient with PR had stable disease on imaging at 12 months follow-up. Two patients were found to have lung metastases at 2 months and 5 months follow-up. To date, there have been two local recurrences in the complete responders. Both patients had nasopharyngeal primary; one was retreated with radioactive Cesium-137 implant and the other died from the disease. CLINICAL FEASIBILITY: The average treatment time for a three-arc treatment was 17.5 minutes and 2.5 minutes for each additional arc. Eleven patients (55%) had four-arc treatment while six patients (30%) had five-arc treatment and three patients (15%) had three-arc treatment. Immobilization was reproducible within less than 2 mm. The treatment planning, QA and documentation prior to treatment averaged 2 days. DOSIMETRY: The mean doses to the primary and secondary targets were 64.4 Gy and 54.4 Gy, respectively; 8.9% of the primary target volume and 11.6% of the secondary target volume were below prescribed dose goal. The mean dose delivered to the mandible was 30 Gy, spinal cord 17 Gy, ipsilateral parotid 23 Gy, and contralateral parotid 21 Gy. COST: Total Medicare allowable charge for SMART boost was $7000 compared to $8600 (conventional) and $9400 (accelerated fractionation). CONCLUSIONS: SMART boost technique is an accelerated radiotherapy scheme that can be delivered with acceptable toxicity. It allows parotid sparing as evidenced both clinically and by dosimetry. Initial tumor response has been encouraging. It is clinically feasible and cost saving. A larger population of patients and a long-term fol     

Validation of biological dosimetry in patients conditioned with total body irradiation: conventional cytogenetics and in situ hybridization(FISH)]

PURPOSE: Validation of biological dosimetry versus physical dosimetry in malignant haemopathy patients conditioned by total body irradiation (TBI) before bone marrow transplantation (BMT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The scoring of chromosomal aberrations in peripheral lymphocytes irradiated in vivo was used to perform the biological dosimetry. The data were compared to those obtained with healthy volunteers' total blood exposed to in vitro irradiation with linear accelerator doses (0.2, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 Gy) for dose-response curves. In experimental animal models, can in vivo and in vitro responses be considered as being the same? All the published human data are based on retrospective dose evaluation with very large uncertainties on the dose precisely delivered to the subject. TBI before BMT was taken as a model where the dose calculation results from the physical method, with homogeneous beam and dose delivered precisely along the entire organism. In vivo response allows us to validate biological dosimetry in 15 adult patients (female + male), before (D = 0 Gy) and after the first fraction of 1.8 Gy, delivered by a linear accelerator (18 MV, dose-rate of 15.8 cGy/min-1). Two methods, conventional cytogenetics (CCG) and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH painting) of chromosome 4 were respectively used to analyze the unstable chromosome aberrations and stable chromosome aberrations. RESULTS: Healthy volunteer lymphocytes, before irradiation, yielded 0.1% dicentrics and 0.3% translocations of chromosome 4, with 2.5% for the whole genome. Patients before irradiation had 2% dicentrics and 11.48% chromosome 4 translocations for the whole genome. In the 15 patients, for a physical dose of 1.8 Gy, the evaluated biological dose was 1.93 Gy (95% CI: 1.85-2.05 Gy) with conventional cytogenetics and 2.06 Gy (95% CI: 1.75-2.15 Gy) with FISH. CONCLUSION: These results, in which the biologically estimated dose is in complete agreement with the dose calculated by physical dosimetry in the homogeneous irradiation model, suggest the validation of biological dosimetry in TBI conditioning.     

Lethal pulmonary complications significantly correlate with individually assessed mean lung dose in patients with hematologic malignancies treated with total body irradiation

PURPOSE: To assess the impact of lung dose on lethal pulmonary complications (LPCs) in a single-center group of patients with hematologic malignancies treated with total body irradiation (TBI) in the conditioning regimen for bone marrow transplantation (BMT). METHODS: The mean lung dose of 101 TBI-conditioned patients was assessed by a thorough (1 SD around 2%) in vivo transit dosimetry technique. Fractionated TBI (10 Gy, 3.33 Gy/fraction, 1 fraction/d, 0.055 Gy/min) was delivered using a lateral-opposed beam technique with shielding of the lung by the arms. The median lung dose was 9.4 Gy (1 SD 0.8 Gy, range 7.8--11.4). The LPCs included idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP) and non-idiopathic IP (non-IIP). RESULTS: Nine LPCs were observed. LPCs were observed in 2 (3.8%) of 52 patients in the group with a lung dose < or = 9.4 Gy and in 7 (14.3%) of 49 patients in the >9.4 Gy group. The 6-month LPC risk was 3.8% and 19.2% (p = 0.05), respectively. A multivariate analysis adjusted by the following variables: type of malignancy (acute leukemia, chronic leukemia, lymphoma, myeloma), type of BMT (allogeneic, autologous), cytomegalovirus infection, graft vs. host disease, and previously administered drugs (bleomycin, cytarabine, cyclophosphamide, nitrosoureas), revealed a significant and independent association between lung dose and LPC risk (p = 0.02; relative risk = 6.7). Of the variables analyzed, BMT type (p = 0.04; relative risk = 6.6) had a risk predictive role. CONCLUSION: The mean lung dose is an independent predictor of LPC risk in patients treated with the 3 x 3.33-Gy low-dose-rate TBI technique. Allogeneic BMT is associated with a higher risk of LPCs.     

全身照射及半导体实时剂量监测技术在造血干细胞移植中应用

目的 探讨全身照射及半导体实时剂量监测方法 在造血干细胞移植中应用的安全性和临床疗效.方法 采用6 MV X线对57例需造血干细胞移植的患者行半坐立姿或侧卧式两野或四野前后平行对穿野单次或分次照射,并在照射中使用6个半导体探头对患者不同部位进行实时剂量监测,根据监测结果 采用不同厚度的铅皮调整人体中平面受照剂量的均匀性.结果 接受分次照射的41例患者疗后均有轻度和中度恶心、呕吐、腮腺肿胀等症状,但均能耐受,经对症治疗后好转,顺利完成造血干细胞的移植,无一发生间质性肺炎.实时监测也表明,患者全身照射剂量均匀性符合临床治疗要求.结论 采用半导体探测器实时剂量监测与半坐立姿或侧卧式前后平行对穿照射技术是一种安全、有效的全身照射方法 .     

Total body irradiation: Significant dose sparing of lung tissue achievable by helical tomotherapy

PurposeTotal body irradiation (TBI) is an important procedure in the conditioning for bone marrow and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Doses up to 12 Gy are delivered in hyperfractionated regimes. TBI performed with helical Tomotherapy® (Accuray, Madison, Wisconsin, USA) is an alternative to conventional techniques to deliver dose in extended target volumes with the possibility of simultaneous dose sparing to organs at risk. In this study we focused on maximum dose reduction to the lungs in TBI using helical Tomotherapy®.Material and methodsForty treatment plans of patients who received TBI were calculated with TomoH® (Accuray, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, Version 2.0.4) with a dose of 12 Gy delivered in six equal fractions (2 × 2 Gy/day). Planning iterations necessary to accomplish ICRU 83 report should be less than 250. Treatment time should be practicable in daily routine (<60 min.). Besides the usual contouring of organs at risk special contouring was required for optimization processes which focused on maximum dose sparing in the central lung tissue. Dose constraints (D2, D98, D99) were predefined for target volumes (i.e. PTV TBI D99: 90% of prescribed dose). Homogeneity index <0.15 was defined for acceptability of the treatment plan.ResultsFor all patients acceptable treatment plan fulfilling the predefined constraints were achievable. An average time of 46 min is required for treatment. Thirty-four of forty patients fulfilled D2 in the PTV TBI. Four patients failed D2 due to a high BMI >28 (maximum dose 13.76 Gy = 114.7%). The D98 in the PTV TBI was not reached by 2/40 patients due to BMI > 31 (minimum dose 11.31 Gy = dose coverage of 94.2%). Also these two patients failed the homogeneity index <0.15. The mean lung dose over all patients of the right lung was 7.18 Gy (range 6.4–9.5 Gy). The left lung showed a median (D50) dose of 7.9 Gy (range 6.7–9.3 Gy). Central lung dose showed a mean dose (D50) of 5.16 Gy (range 4.02–7.29 Gy). The D80 of the central lung showed an average dose of 3.87 Gy.ConclusionsTotal body irradiation using helical Tomotherapy® can be delivered with maximum lung tissue sparing (<6 Gy) but without compromise in adjacent PTV TBI structures (i.e. ribs, heart). High conformity and homogeneity in extended radiation volumes can be reached with this technique in an acceptable planning and treatment time. Limitations may occurred in patients with high body mass index.     

Accurate in vivo dosimetry of a randomized trial of prostate cancer irradiation

Purpose: To guarantee an accurate dose delivery, within ± 2.5%, in a Phase III randomized trial of prostate cancer irradiation (68 vs. 78 Gy) by means of a comprehensive in vivo dosimetry program.Methods and Materials: Prostate patients are generally treated in our clinic with a 3-field isocentric technique: an 8-MV anteroposterior beam and 2 18-MV wedged laterals. All fields are shaped conformally to the PTV. Patients were randomized between two dose levels of 68 Gy and 78 Gy. During treatment, the entrance and exit dose were measured for each patient with diodes. Special 2.5-mm thick steel build-up caps were applied to make the diodes appropriate for measurements in 18-MV photon beams as well. Portal images were used to verify the correct position of the diodes and to detect and correct for gas filling in the rectum that may influence the exit dose reading. Entrance and exit dose measurements were converted to midplane dose, which was used in combination with a depth dose correction to obtain the dose at the specification point. An action level of 2.5% was applied.Results: The added build-up for the diodes in the 18-MV beams resulted in correction factors that were only slightly sensitive to changes in beam setup and comparable to the corrections used in the 8-MV beams for diodes without extra build-up. The calibration factor increased almost linearly with cumulative dose: 0.7%/kGy for the 8-MV and 1.2%/kGy for the 18-MV photon beams. The introduction of average correction factors made the analysis easier, while keeping the accuracy within acceptable limits. In a period of 3 years, 225 patients were analyzed, from which 8 patients needed to be corrected. The average ratio of measured and prescribed dose was 1.009 (standard deviation [SD] 0.012) for the total group treated on two linear accelerators. When the results were analyzed per accelerator, the ratios were 1.002 (SD, 0.001) for Accelerator A and 1.015 (SD, 0.001) for Accelerator B. This difference could be attributed to the cumulative effect of three small imperfections in the performance of Accelerator B that were well within the limits of our quality assurance program.Conclusion: Diodes can be used for accurate in vivo dosimetry during prostate irradiation in high-energy photon beams. The dose delivery in this randomized trial is guaranteed within the 2.5% limits on an individual patient basis. This could not be achieved without the in vivo dosimetry program, despite our high-standard quality assurance program of treatment delivery.