Phase II study of mitomycin,ifosfamide and cisplatin in adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus

 We evaluated the effect of brief neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with apparently operable adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus. Two courses of mitomycin (6 mg/m²), ifosfamide (3 g/m²) and cisplatin (50 mg/m²; MIC) were given followed by evaluation of response by barium swallow and computed tomography scan. Of 20 patients, 17 completed both courses and 4 (20%) showed a partial response. Toxicity was generally mild and consisted principally of nausea and vomiting. Altogether, 15 patients were surgically explored; resection was completed in 12 patients, 3 of whom died in hospital (25%). Neoadjuvant therapy with MIC offers no advantage over surgery alone. Received: 14 June 1993/Accepted: 12 July 1995     

A phase II study of mitomycin C, cisplatin and continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil (MCF) in the treatment of patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site

Carcinoma of unknown primary site remains a common clinical diagnosis, accounting for between 5 and 10% of all cancer patients. Numerous combination chemotherapy regimens have been used in the management of carcinoma of unknown primary site, resulting in response rates of 0-48%. We present the results of a single centre phase II study of the use of the combination of mitomycin C (7 mg m(-2) on day 1 of cycles 1, 3 and 5) cisplatin (60 mg m(-2) on day 1) and continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil (300 mg m(-2) daily), MCF, delivered as a 21-day cycle, in patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site. Thirty-one patients with a diagnosis of carcinoma of unknown primary site were treated in Aberdeen Royal Infirmary between 1997 and 2001 with MCF. In total, 136 cycles of MCF were delivered (median of 5 cycles per patient). Toxicity was acceptable, with 19% grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, 16% grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia and 13% grade 3 or 4 nausea and vomiting. No cases of neutropenic sepsis were seen and there were no treatment-related deaths, however, six patients developed thrombotic complications. The overall response rate was 27% (CR 3%; PR 23%). Median time to progression was 3.4 months (95% CI 1.1-5.6 months) and median overall survival was 7.7 months (95% CI 5.7-9.8 months). Survival at 1 year was 28%, and at 2 years, 10%. MCF is a tolerable regimen with comparable toxicity, response rates and survival data to most platinum-based combination chemotherapy regimens in use for this devastating disease.     

A phase II study of doxorubicin, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach or esophagus

Background: The combination of epirubicin, cisplatin, and infusional 5-fluorouracil (ECF) currently represents a standard and effective regimen for the treatment of advanced gastroesophageal cancer. The use of doxorubicin as an alternative to epirubicin in the ECF regimen has not been evaluated. Methods: Thirty-two patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach, gastroesophageal junction, or esophagus were treated with cisplatin 60 mg/m² and doxorubicin 30 mg/m² repeated every 21 days, in combination with infusional 5-fluorouracil 200 mg/m²/day (ACF). Results: Major objective responses were observed in 28 percent of patients (46 percent previously untreated; 13 percent previously treated), with one complete response. The median progression-free survival was 4.0 months, and the median overall survival was 5.8 months (9.3 months previously untreated; 4.5 months previously treated). The major (Grade 3-4) toxicities were neutropenia (34 percent), anorexia (31 percent), nausea (28 percent), diarrhea (19 percent), and stomatitis (16 percent). Conclusion: In comparison with historical data taken from published trials of ECF, the ACF regimen appears similar in efficacy when differences in prior treatment status are taken into account. However, ACF appears to be associated with a higher incidence of major toxicities. Our findings therefore support the continued use of epirubicin rather than doxorubicin in combination chemotherapy regimens for advanced gastroesophageal cancer.     

Phase II trial of streptozotocin, mitomycin C, and 5-fluorouracil in adenocarcinoma of the pancreas

A phase II study study employing 5-fluorouracil, mitomycin C, and streptozotocin in unresectable pancreatic carcinoma was performed. Seven of 22 patients (32%) responded and 4 of 22 (18%) had stable disease. Median survival of the entire group was 6 months, and of responders 9.5 months. In 13 patients with localized disease, five responses (38%) were seen and median survival was 7.5 months. Toxicity of the regimen was moderate, being predominantly gastrointestinal and renal. The usefulness of this regimen in localized pancreatic cancer should be explored further.     

Feasibility of preoperative combined radiation therapy and chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin in potentially resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: The French SFRO-FFCD 97-04 Phase II trial

PURPOSE: More than 80% of patients who undergo a potentially curative resection for pancreatic cancer develop local or distant recurrence. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy might offer potential benefits regarding local and systemic control and survival. This multi-institutional Phase II trial explored the feasibility of preoperative chemoradiation in this situation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Treatment consisted of concurrent radiotherapy (50 Gy within 5 weeks), and chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (300 mg/m(2)/day, 5 days/week, 5 consecutive weeks) and cisplatin (20 mg/m(2)/day, Days 1-5 and 29-33), followed by surgical resection of the pancreatic tumor in patients without progression. RESULTS: A total of 41 patients were enrolled. Of these, 38 (93%) received > or =47 Gy; 30 patients (73%) received > or =75% of the prescribed doses of chemotherapy. Surgical resection was performed in 26 patients (63%). Because of local or metastatic progression, 5 patients (12%) did not undergo surgery and 10 underwent surgery without resection of the pancreatic tumor. Operative mortality was 2.8%. Among 40 evaluable patients, 27 were successfully treated (67.5%; 95% CI, 50.9-81.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Pancreatic cancer is chemo-radiosensitive. The proposed pre-operative scheme is feasible, does not prevent successful surgery, and must be tested on a Phase III setting. Yet, the large proportion of tumor progression during and after chemoradiation justifies the use of more efficient drugs such as Gemcitabine, and optimized radiotherapy including new techniques such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy.     

A phase II trial of 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, mitomycin C, and leucovorin in advanced gastric carcinoma

To determine the feasibility and toxicity of combining leucovorin (CF) with a 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) combination chemotherapy regimen currently accepted by many as standard treatment for gastric cancer, CF (500 mg/m2) was administered in combination with the Georgetown 5-FU, doxorubicin, and mitomycin C (FAM) regimen. Thirty-two patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach were evaluable for toxicity and 26 patients with measurable disease were evaluable for response. Fifty-four percent of patients were previously treated with chemotherapy or radiation therapy. The response rate was 38% (95% confidence interval, 21% to 59%). The median duration of response was 6 months (range, 2 to 23+ months). The estimated median survival time was 6.8 months for patients with measurable disease and 11.5 months for all 32 patients. Although diarrhea is dose limiting when 5-FU and CF are administered weekly for 6 of 8 weeks, diarrhea occurred rarely on this combination regimen with 5-FU and CF administered only 4 of every 8 weeks. The dose-limiting toxicity of FAM-CF was cumulative myelosuppression, which also occurs with the standard FAM regimen. As a result, the administered dose intensity of 5-FU decreased as patients continued on study. Thus, a randomized comparison of FAM with FAM-CF would not determine whether CF modulation increases the efficacy of 5-FU when it is administered in optimal doses to patients with gastric cancer.     

A phase II open-label study of DHA-paclitaxel (Taxoprexin) by 2-h intravenous infusion in previously untreated patients with locally advanced or metastatic gastric or oesophageal adenocarcinoma

Purpose Combination chemotherapy regimens can improve survival in patients with advanced gastric and oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)-paclitaxel is a novel conjugate formed by the covalent linkage of the fatty acid DHA to paclitaxel and may result in increased tumour exposure to paclitaxel without increased toxicity. Patients and methods In this single arm, phase II study of DHA-paclitaxel, eligible patients with previously untreated, inoperable locally advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus, oesophago-gastric junction or stomach were treated with DHA-paclitaxel (1,100 mg/m²) administered by 2-h intravenous infusion every 21 days. Results Fifty-four patients were recruited of whom 53 were evaluable for toxicity, and 48 for response. There were five confirmed partial responses (9.4%) by the RECIST criteria. The median duration of response was 87 days (range 49–97 days), the median time to progression was 84 days (95% CI 78–124 days), and median overall survival was 262 days (95% CI 205–357 days). Grade ≥3 neutropaenia occurred in 93% of patients, and febrile neutropaenia in 17% of patients. Conclusions DHA-paclitaxel has modest activity in patients with oesophago-gastric cancer and with haematological toxicity that is comparable to paclitaxel and docetaxel.     

Phase II trial of 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and cisplatin for treatment of advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Background. Advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma is a rapidlyfatal disease for which an active chemotherapy regimen is sought.Here we report the outcome of a phase II trial to assess thetoxicity and efficacy of a combination of 5-flu-orouracil (5-FU),leucovorin and cisplatin (CDDP). Methods. A regimen combining leucovorin (200 mg/m²/d x 5d),5-FU (375 mg/m²/d x 5d in a 2-hour infusion) and CDDP (15 mg/m²/dx 5d) was given to 52 patients with histologically-proven, previouslyuntreated, locally advanced (n = 13) and/or metastatic (n =39) pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Results. Of 48 patients evaluable for response, 10 achievedpartial responses, for an overall response rate of 21% (95%CI 9.5%–32.5%), and a palliative effect was observed in52%. The median survival was 9.5 months (18 months for locally-advancedand 5 months for metastatic disease) with a 1-year survivalof 34.6% and a median progression-free survival of 4.5 months.Chemotherapy was well tolerated with grades 3 or 4 nausea/vomitingin 12%, diarrhea in 6%, anaemia in 17%, neutropenia in 12%,and thrombocytopenia in 10%. Eleven patients (21%) had Grade2 peripheral neuropathy. Conclusion. The combination of leucovorin, 5-FU and CDDP seemsto be an effective palliative treatment, with moderate toxiceffects, in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma, cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin     

A phase III randomized trial of 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and mitomycin C versus 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin C versus 5-fluorouracil alone in curatively resected gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: A phase III single-center randomized trial was performed in order to determine whether the addition of mitomycin C (MMC) and/or doxorubicin to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) as adjuvant chemotherapy could influence survival in patients with curatively resected gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 416 patients who had undergone curative resection for stage IB-IIIB gastric adenocarcinoma were stratified according to the stage and type of surgery, and then randomized to receive one of the three chemotherapy regimens, 5-FU alone (F) or 5-FU and MMC (FM) or 5-FU, doxorubicin and MMC (FAM) within 5 weeks after surgery. RESULTS: Of 416 patients registered, 395 (133 in F, 131 in FM and 131 in FAM) were assessable. Median follow-up duration was 91 months. Five-year overall survival rates were 67.2% for F, 67.0% for FM and 66.7% for FAM (P = 0.97). Five-year disease-free survival rates were 62.1% for F, 63.3% for FM and 62.5% for FAM (P = 0.83). Hematological toxicities were more frequent in the FM and FAM groups, whereas stomatitis was more common in the F group. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with adjuvant 5-FU alone, the addition of MMC and/or doxorubicin to 5-FU did not influence survival in patients with resected gastric cancer.     

A phase II trial of mitomycin C and 5-fluorouracil as second-line therapy in advanced breast cancer

Summary Fifty five patients who had relapsed or progressed from chemotherapy for advanced disease were treated with mitomycin C and 5-FU on a 6 weekly regimen. After a median of 2 cycles of therapy the overall response rate was 12% with no complete responses. Significant leucopenia but no thrombocytopenia was seen and despite the low overall response rate the regimen was tolerable and did produce responses in patients primarily resistant to Adriamycin combination chemotherapy. Low overall activity indicates the need for more effective second line treatment.     

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin versus mitomycin-C, 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin for advanced gastric cancer: a randomized phase II trial

Purpose  

Clinical data suggested that a regimen incorporating doxorubicin to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin may be more effective but probably quite toxic for advanced gastric cancer patients. With the aim to maintain efficacy while reducing toxicity, we compared the activity and safety of a combination of 5-FU, cisplatin and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin with a combination of 5-FU, cisplatin and mitomycin-C.     

Dose-intense PEFG (cisplatin, epirubicin, 5-fluorouracil, gemcitabine) in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND: PEFG regimen (cisplatin and epirubicin 40 mg/m2 day 1, gemcitabine 600 mg/m2 days 1 and 8, 5-fluorouracil (FU) 200 mg/m2/day continuous infusion) significantly improved the outcome of patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA) with respect to standard gemcitabine in a previous phase III trial. This regimen was subsequently modified in a dose-finding study by increasing dose intensity of cisplatin and epirubicin (both at 30 mg/m2 every 14 days) and of gemcitabine (at 800 mg/m2 every 14 days). Results of a consecutive series treated by dose-intense PEFG regimen are herewith reported. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Dose-intense PEFG was administered to chemotherapy-naive patients with stages III-IV PA, < 75 years, performance status (PS) > 50, till progressive disease or for a maximum of 6 months. RESULTS: Between January 2004 and June 2005, 49 (31 or 63% metastatic) patients, median age 62 years, median PS 80, were treated with dose-intense PEFG. Partial response and stable disease was observed in 24 (49%) and 16 (33%) patients, respectively; 31 patients were progression-free at 6 months (PFS-6 = 63%). Median survival was 10.5 months and 1-year overall survival (OS) was 48% (95% confidence interval: 33-61%). Main grade 3-4 toxicity was: neutropenia in 26% of patients, stomatitis and fatigue in 8%, anaemia, diarrhoea, nausea/vomit in 6%, febrile neutropenia and thrombocytopaenia in 4%, hand-foot syndrome in 2%. CONCLUSION: When compared with 84 patients treated by classical PEFG at the same institution, dose-intense PEFG was not inferior in terms of PFS-6 (63 versus 57%), 1-year OS (48 versus 42%) and response rate (49 versus 49%); it allowed to increase dose intensity for gemcitabine by 32%, for cisplatin and epirubicin by 36% (FU reduced by 3%), to significantly reduce grade 3-4 hematological toxicity (neutropenia: 26 versus 86%; P < 0.00001; thrombocytopaenia: 4 versus 58%; P < 0.00001) and to reduce by one-third the number of outpatient accesses. The new PEFG schedule appears more suitable for clinical use and should be preferred as a basis for further development of therapeutic strategies against pancreatic cancer.     

A pilot study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with mitomycin C,etoposide, cisplatin,and epirubicin for adenocarcinoma of the cervix

Background To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of the combination of mitomycin C, etoposide, cisplatin, and epirubicin (MEPA) as neoadjuvant therapy for patients with cervical adenocarcinoma.Methods Fourteen patients with cervical adenocarcinoma received neoadjuvant MEPA therapy followed by radical hysterectomy. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage was: IB1 in 2 patients, IB2 in 5, and IIB in 7. The MEPA regimen consisted of mitomycin C (15mg/m²) on day 1, etoposide (70mg/m²) on days 1 to 3, cisplatin (15mg/m²) on days 1 to 5, and epirubicin (30mg/m²) on day 1, with this course being repeated every 4 weeks. After two or three courses of chemotherapy, all patients underwent radical hysterectomy. Postoperative radiotherapy was given to 6 patients who showed risk factors at surgery.Results Of the 14 patients, 7 had complete remission (CR) clinically, 6 had partial remission, and only 1 showed no change. Examination of surgical material revealed no residual disease in 6 patients, and microscopic residual disease (5mm) in 2 patients. The patients who had no residual disease or microscopic disease in their hysterectomy specimens showed a significantly longer survival than those with macroscopic residual disease (P = 0.012). The dose-limiting toxicity was myelosuppression. Of the 33 treatment cycles administered, leukopenia of grade 3 or more occurred in 70%, and thrombocytopenia of grade 3 or more occurred in 79%. There were no therapy-related deaths.Conclusion Although severe myelosuppression was also observed, there was a satisfactory response rate to MEPA therapy, which showed a good pathological CR rate.     

A phase II trial of continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil, mitoxantrone, and cisplatin for metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND: The aim of the current study was to evaluate the antitumor activity and toxicity of continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil, mitoxantrone, and cisplatin (FMP therapy) in chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: Fifty-one patients with metastatic HCC who had not undergone previous systemic chemotherapy were enrolled. The therapy consisted of intravenous administration of 80 mg/m2 cisplatin and 6 mg/m2 mitoxantrone on Day 1 and continuous intravenous infusion of 450 mg/m2 5-fluorouracil per day on Days 1-5. The treatment was repeated every 4 weeks for a maximum of 6 courses with dose adjustments based on the observed toxic effects if there was no evidence of tumor progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: Of the 51 enrolled patients, 14 (27%) achieved a partial response (95% confidence interval, 16-42%) with a median duration of 7.6 months (range, 2.3-18.4 months). Twenty-seven patients (53%) showed no change and 9 (18%) had progressive disease. The median survival time, 1-year survival rate, and median progression-free survival time for all patients were 11.6 months, 44.3%, and 4.0 months, respectively. The main Grade 3 and 4 toxicities were leukocytopenia (67%), neutropenia (71%), thrombocytopenia (27%), and elevated levels of aspartate aminotransferase (37%) and alanine aminotransferase (41%). These symptoms were generally brief and reversible, with the exception of one treatment-related death due to acute hepatic failure. CONCLUSIONS: FMP therapy had significant antitumor activity with acceptable toxicity in patients with metastatic HCC.     

A phase II trial of preoperative chemotherapy with epirubicin, cisplatin and capecitabine for patients with localised gastro-oesophageal junctional adenocarcinoma

Preoperative cisplatin/fluorouracil is used for the treatment of localised oesophageal carcinoma. This phase II study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of administering preoperative epirubicin/cisplatin/capecitabine (ECX). Patients with stage II or III oesophageal/gastro-oesophageal junctional adenocarcinoma from one institution received 4 cycles of ECX (epirubicin 50 mg m⁻² day 1, cisplatin 60 mg m⁻² day 1, capecitabine 625 mg m⁻² b.i.d. daily) followed by surgery. The primary end point was the pathological complete response (pCR) rate based on a Simon two-stage design. Secondary end points included overall and progression-free survival (OS/PFS). Thirty-four patients were recruited: median age 60 years (range 41–81), 91% male, 97% PS 0/1, 80% T3, 68% N1. Thirty-one patients completed four ECX cycles. Grade 3/4 toxicities ⩾5% included neutropenia (62%), hand–foot syndrome (15%) and nausea/vomiting (9%). Thirteen out of 28 (46%) evaluable patients responded to chemotherapy by EUS (⩾30% reduction in maximal tumour thickness). Twenty-six out of 34 (76%) patients underwent resection (R0=73%, R1=27%). Post-operatively, two patients died within 60 days of surgery. The pCR rate was 5.9% (95% CI 0–14%) in the intent-to-treat population. According to the statistical design, this prompted early study termination. However, with a median follow-up of 34 months the median OS and 1- and 2-year survival rates were 17 months, 67 and 39% respectively. Median PFS was 13 months. Of the 14 relapsed patients, 10 presented with distant metastases. Preoperative ECX is feasible and well tolerated. Although associated with a low pCR rate, survival with ECX was comparable with published studies suggesting that pCR may not correlate with satisfactory outcome from preoperative chemotherapy for localised oesophageal adenocarcinoma.     

Phase II trial combining mitomycin with 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cisplatin in recurrent and metastatic undifferentiated carcinoma of nasopharyngeal type

Background: This phase-II study was conducted to investigate the potential benefit from the addition of mitomycin to a conventional anthracycline-cisplatin- and 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy for recurrent and metastatic undifferentiated carcinoma of nasopharyngeal type (UCNT).Patients and methods: Between July 1989 and December 1991, 44 consecutive patients (M/F 36/8; median age: 45, range 20–72; performance status (PS) 0: 20 patients, PS 1: 14 patients, PS 2: 10 patients) with recurrent or metastatic UCNT were entered in this study after complete clinical, biological, and radiological pre-therapeutic work-ups. Chemotherapy (FMEP regimen) consisted of 800 mg/m2/day 5-fluorouracil in continuous infusion from day 1 to day 4 combined with 70 mg/m2 epirubicin, 10 mg/m2 mitomycin, and 100 mg/m2 cisplatin on day 1, every four weeks for six cycles. Mitomycin was delivered in cycles 1, 3, and 5 only. Eleven patients had isolated loco-regional recurrences, 12 patients had local recurrences associated with distant metastasis, and 21 patients had metastasis only. Toxicity and response were evaluated according to WHO criteria.Toxicity: Grade 3–4 neutropenia was observed in 122 of 212 evaluable cycles (57%) and 39 of 44 patients (89%); febrile neutropenia occurred in 16 patients (36%) and 24 cycles (11.3%). Grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia was observed in 27 patients (61%) and 45 cycles (21%), including 27 of 45 cycles (60%) with mitomycin. Grade 3 anemia was noted in 18 patients (40%) and 23 cycles (11%), including 18 of 23 cycles (78%) with mitomycin. Grade 3–4 mucositis occurred in 25 cycles (11%) and 14 patients (32%), mainly in those previously treated with radiation therapy in the head and neck area. There were four treatment-related deaths (9%); three of them neutropenia-related, and one of cardiac toxicity.Response: Forty-four patients were evaluable for response: There were 23 of 44 objective responses (52%), including six complete responses (13%), and 17 partial responses (38%). Additional radiotherapy was given to 13 patients after documentation of response: Nasopharyngeal tumor + cervical nodes (eight patients) and/or on bone metastasis sites (five patients); mediastinal lymph nodes (one patient). At a median follow-up of 87 months (range 71–100), five patients are alive and in continuous complete remission. The median survival time was 14 months and the median time to progression nine months.Conclusion: The regimen under study is active in recurrent/metastatic UCNT, but associated with excessive toxicity.     

A phase II trial of methotrexate, cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin in the treatment of invasive and metastatic urothelial carcinoma

BACKGROUND: The current treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma generates high response rates but is associated with poor overall survival. The current study evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of a new combination of active drugs in the treatment of urothelial carcinoma. METHODS: Twenty-four patients with muscle invasive or metastatic urothelial carcinoma were enrolled. Fifteen patients (63%) had metastatic disease whereas 9 patients had T2-T4 disease. Three patients were unevaluable for response because of significant toxicity. Patients were treated every 28 days with methotrexate, 60 mg/m(2), intravenously (i.v.) on Day 1; cisplatin, 25 mg/m(2)/day, by continuous i.v. infusion on Days 2-6; 5-flurouracil (5-FU) 800 mg/m(2)/day by continuous i.v. infusion on Days 3-6; and leucovorin, 500 mg/m(2)/day, by continuous i.v. infusion on Days 2-6. Dosage in subsequent cycles was adjusted according to toxicity. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 81 months (range, 53-97+ months). The overall response rate (complete response + partial response) for all 24 patients was 63% (95% confidence interval, 41-81%). The median survival was 65 months in the patients with muscle invasive disease and 17 months in the patients with metastatic disease. The duration of response in patients with metastatic disease was 6 months (range, 4-19 months). Toxicity was significant, with 82% of patients experiencing Common Toxicity Criteria Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and 63% experiencing Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia. However, only three patients developed febrile neutropenia and gastrointestinal and neurologic toxicity was moderate. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of methotrexate, cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin represents an active regimen in the treatment of urothelial carcinoma with a moderate toxicity profile. As new drugs are found to treat urothelial carcinoma, further studies will be needed to evaluate the role of traditional agents such as 5-fluorouracil and methotrexate in new combination chemotherapeutic regimens.     

A multicentre phase II trial of primary chemotherapy with cisplatin and protracted venous infusion 5-fluorouracil followed by chemoradiation in patients with carcinoma of the oesophagus.

BACKGROUND: We undertook a multicentre phase II trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of primary chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation for localised adenocarcinoma or squamous carcinoma of the oesophagus. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemotherapy comprised five 3-weekly cycles of cisplatin and protracted continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil, with conformally planned radiotherapy commencing at the start of the fifth cycle. RESULTS: The planned treatment programme was completed by 39 of 72 patients (54%), and a further 13% completed chemotherapy and proceeded to surgical oesophagectomy. Response rates to chemotherapy and to the entire treatment programme were 47% [95% confidence interval (CI) 34% to 60%] and 56% (CI 43% to 68%). The dysphagia score improved in 54% of patients. The median survival duration was 14.6 months with 1- and 2-year survival rates of 58.7% and 44.1%, respectively. Grade III/IV chemotherapy-related toxicity occurred in 38% of patients, and there were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: This is a feasible and active treatment regimen providing palliative benefits for patients with poor-prognosis localised oesophageal cancer.     

Perioperative docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) for locally advanced esophageal and gastric adenocarcinoma: a multicenter phase II trial

BackgroundAlthough perioperative chemotherapy for esophagogastric adenocarcinoma (ADC) improves survival, the overall poor prognosis suggests that further refinement of treatment is required. Docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (DCF) is effective for metastatic ADC of the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract; we thus sought to investigate the efficacy of this regimen in patients with resectable disease.Patients and methodsPatients with resectable ADC of the upper GI tract received DCF [docetaxel (Taxotere) 75 mg/m² I.V. day 1, cisplatin 75 mg/m² I.V. day 1, 5-FU 750 mg/m² continuous infusion for 120 h, every 3 weeks] for three cycles before and after resection. Primary end point was complete resection; secondary end points were response, toxicity, surgical morbidity, and overall survival.ResultsForty-three patients with ADC of the esophagus (11), gastroesophageal junction (25), or stomach (7) started treatment and 86% completed all preoperative cycles with grade 3–4 toxicity arising in 47%. Metabolic response to chemotherapy (reduction in maximal standard uptake value >35%) was achieved in 25/33 (76%) patients. Surgery was carried out in 41/43 and complete resection was achieved in all 41 patients with pathologic complete response in 4/41. Postoperative chemotherapy was started in 29 patients and completed in 24. Three-year overall survival was 60%.ConclusionPerioperative DCF is a tolerable and highly effective regimen for the treatment of esophagogastric ADC.