Phase III trial of interferon alfa-2a with or without 13-cis-retinoic acid for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: A randomized phase III trial was conducted to determine whether combination therapy with 13-cis-retinoic acid (13-CRA) plus interferon alfa-2a (IFNalpha2a) is superior to IFNalpha2a alone in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred eighty-four patients were randomized to treatment with IFNalpha2a plus 13-CRA or treatment with IFNalpha2a alone. IFNalpha2a was given daily subcutaneously, starting at a dose of 3 million units (MU). The dose was escalated every 7 days from 3 to 9 MU (by increments of 3 MU), unless >/= grade 2 toxicity occurred, in which case dose escalation was stopped. Patients randomized to combination therapy were given oral 13-CRA 1 mg/kg/d plus IFNalpha2a. Quality of life (QOL) was assessed. RESULTS: Complete or partial responses were achieved by 12% of patients treated with IFNalpha2a plus 13-CRA and 6% of patients treated with IFNalpha2a (P =.14). Median duration of response (complete and partial combined) in the group treated with the combination was 33 months (range, 9 to 50 months), versus 22 months (range, 5 to 38 months) for the second group (P =.03). Nineteen percent of patients treated with IFNalpha2a plus 13-CRA were progression-free at 24 months, compared with 10% of patients treated with IFNalpha2a alone (P =.05). Median survival time for all patients was 15 months, with no difference in survival between the two treatment arms (P =.26). QOL decreased during the first 8 weeks of treatment, and a partial recovery followed. Lower scores were associated with the combination therapy. CONCLUSION: Response proportion and survival did not improve significantly with the addition of 13-CRA to IFNalpha2a therapy in patients with advanced RCC. 13-CRA may lengthen response to IFNalpha2a therapy in patients with IFNalpha2a-sensitive tumors. Treatment, particularly the combination therapy, was associated with a decrease in QOL.     

Recombinant interferon alfa-2a with or without vinblastine in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: results of a European multi-center phase III study.

A total of 178 patients with metastatic renal cell cancer were randomized to receive interferon alfa-2a (rIFN alfa-2a) or interferon alfa-2a+vinblastine (VLB). IFN alfa-2a was injected intramuscularly at a dose of 18 MIU 3 times a week and VLB was given intravenously at a dose of 0.1 mg/kg once every 3 weeks. The response rate was 11% for patients on monotherapy and 24% for those on combination treatment. The 5-year survival for 145 eligible patients was 9%, independently from the treatment arm. The performance status was significantly related to long-term prognosis, and 13% of the patients with performance status 0 were alive at 5 years, as compared to 6% and 0% for patients with a WHO grade of 1 and 2, respectively. The most frequent adverse events in both treatment arms were flu-like symptoms (95%), fatigue (70%) and gastrointestinal disturbances (68%). Leukopenia was observed more frequently with combination treatment (53%) than with IFN alfa-2a alone (30%). In conclusion, rIFN alfa-2a monotherapy at this dose and schedule has modest antitumor activity in metastatic renal cell cancer. The combination of rIFN alfa-2a+VLB results in a doubling of the response rate, but this does not translate into prolonged survival. Toxicity (except leukopenia) and tolerance were similar in both treatment arms.     

Prospective randomized trial of interferon alfa-2b and interleukin-2 as adjuvant treatment for resected intermediate- and high-risk primary melanoma without clinically detectable node metastasis.

PURPOSE: Low-dose interferon alfa (IFNalpha) has been shown to have limited effects in the adjuvant treatment of patients with intermediate- and high-risk primary melanoma. We hypothesized that a combination regimen with low-dose interleukin-2 (IL-2) may improve survival prospects in these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After wide excision of primary melanoma without clinically detectable lymph node metastasis (pT3 to 4, cN0, M0), 225 patients from 10 participating centers were randomly assigned to receive either subcutaneous low-dose IFNalpha2b (3 million international units [MU]/m2/d, days 1 to 7, week 1; three times weekly, weeks 3 to 6, repeated all 6 weeks) plus IL-2 (9 MU/m2/d, days 1 to 4, week 2 of each cycle) for 48 weeks, or observation alone. The primary end point was prolongation of a relapse-free interval. RESULTS: Of the 225 enrolled patients, 223 were found to be eligible. Median follow-up time was 79 months. All evaluated prognostic factors were well balanced between the two arms of the study. Relapses were noticed in 36 of 113 patients treated with IFNalpha2b plus IL-2 and in 34 of 110 patients with observation alone. Five-year disease-free survival of those who had routine surgery supplemented by IFNalpha2b and IL-2 treatment was 70.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 61.3% to 78.9%), compared with 69.9% in those receiving surgery and observation alone (95% CI, 60.7% to 79.1%) in the intention-to-treat analysis. Evaluation of the overall survival did not show any difference between treated and untreated melanoma patients (P =.93). CONCLUSION: Adjuvant treatment of intermediate- and high-risk melanoma patients with low-dose IFNalpha2b and IL-2 is safe and well tolerated by most patients, but it does not improve disease-free or overall survival.     

Cytokines and tumor vaccination

Patients with locally advanced stages of renal cell carcinoma are at high risk of relapse or progress even after initial radical surgery. Based on the proven efficacy of adoptive and active immunotherapeutic approaches of metastatic renal cell carcinoma, a phase II trial was started in 1989 using autologous, Newcastle disease virus modified and lethally irradiated tumor cell vaccines in combination with low-dose recombinant interleukin-2 (1.8 million U) and recombinant interferon-alpha 2a (1.0 million U) for a surgical adjuvant treatment. Patients were vaccinated (subcutaneous injection) once a week for 8-10 weeks and the treatment was started about 4-10 weeks after surgery. Up to now more than 208 patients with locally advanced renal cell carcinoma (stages pT2-3a, N1-2, M0; pT3b-4, N0-2, M0) were vaccinated after initial radical surgery (tumor nephrectomy with lymph node dissection and ipsilateral adrenalectomy and if necessary in combination with en bloc removal of venous extensions). We overview a follow-up of 203 evaluable patients with a median disease-free survival of 21 months (range of 2-64 months). During this observation period 18 relapses (8.9%) were diagnosed with 3 local relapses (1.5%), 10 lymph node metastases (5%) and/or distant organ metastases in 9 cases (4.5%). These progressive patients' disease was treated by surgery and/or combined immunochemotherapy. Toxicity encountered on this tumor cell vaccination was mild (WHO grade 1) and was characterized by flu-like symptoms and fever up to 38.8 degree Celsius for some hours beginning at 4 hours after the vaccine/cytokine application. Occasionally a transient local inflammation at the site of injection was observed. The comparison of the risk-factor-adapted group of adjuvant treated renal cell carcinoma patients (locally advanced stages) with historical data gave evidence for an improvement in disease-free survival on vaccination treatment. Although this was not a prospective randomized trial, we can summarize that the surgical adjuvant treatment of autologous tumor vaccines in combination with low-dose cytokines may improve relapse-free and overall survival in patients with locally advanced renal cell cancer.     

A phase II trial of interferon-alpha and toremifene in advanced renal cell cancer patients

Treatment options for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma are limited. Interferon-alpha has an overall response rate of 10-15% in phase II and III clinical trials and is considered a standard option for patients. Though the anti-estrogen toremifene has shown only modest single agent activity in renal cell carcinoma, evidence for synergy of anti-estrogens with interferon-alpha exists in renal cell and other cancers. Therefore, a phase II trial was undertaken to test the combination of interferon-alpha and toremifene in advanced renal cell carcinoma. Thirteen patients with measurable metastatic or unresectable local disease were treated with interferon-alpha at a dose of 5 million units/m² three times a week and daily oral toremifene at 300 mg daily in divided doses. Patients were treated for 12 weeks and then restaged. Clinical response was the primary endpoint of the trial. Four patients (31%) had evidence of stable disease at 12 weeks, while the remaining nine patients (69%) progressed on treatment. Toxicity was moderate, with grade 2 or 3 fatigue, nausea and anorexia each noted in 31% of patients. We conclude that the combination of interferon-alpha plus toremifene demonstrates no significant activity in advanced renal cell carcinoma.     

Combined interferon and vinblastine treatment of advanced melanoma and renal cell cancer

Thirteen patients with metastatic melanoma and ten patients with advanced renal cell cancer (RCC) received interferon alfa-2a (Roferon-A) and vinblastine. In melanoma the interferon dose was 3-9 million IU i.m., escalated daily for 10 weeks, and in RCC the dose was 18 million IU three times a week i.m. The dose of vinblastine was 0.075-0.15 mg/kg every third week i.v. One of the ten evaluable patients with melanoma had partial remission (PR; 11%) and three presented no change (NC). Three of seven evaluable patients with renal cell carcinoma had PR (43%) and three NC. Duration of the remission was 10 months in the melanoma patients and 7+, 10+, and 7+ in the RCC patients. The three times a week schedule was better tolerated. The most common side effects were fever, fatigue, loss of taste, weight loss, and neutropenia. On the basis of these results it can be concluded that in melanoma the combination of daily administration of interferon and vinblastine is not effective, whereas in renal cell cancer interferon and vinblastine treatment given three times a week seems to be favorable.     

Randomized phase II/III trial of interferon Alfa-2a with and without 13-cis-retinoic acid in patients with progressive metastatic renal cell Carcinoma: the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Genito-Urinary Tract Cancer Group (EORTC 30951).

PURPOSE: A randomized phase II/III trial was conducted to determine whether combination treatment with 13-cis-retinoic acid (13-CRA) plus interferon alfa-2a (IFN-alpha-2a) was superior to IFN-alpha-2a alone in patients with progressive metastatic renal cell carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred twenty patients were randomly assigned to treatment with IFN-alpha-2a plus 13-CRA or to IFN-alpha-2a alone. IFN-alpha-2a was given daily subcutaneously, starting at a dose of 3 million units (MU). The dose was escalated every 7 days from 3 to 9 MU by increments of 3 MU. Patients randomly assigned to combination therapy received oral 13-CRA 1 mg/kg/d plus IFN-alpha-2a. RESULTS: Median time to progression was 5.1 months for patients treated with the combination and 3.4 months for patients on IFN-alpha-2a alone (P = .008). Progression-free survival rates at 6 months were 43% for patients receiving combined therapy and 30% for patients on IFN-alpha-2a, and at 12 months, 27% and 17%, respectively. Median overall survival was 17.3 months for patients on IFN-alpha-2a and 13-CRA, and 13.2 months for patients treated with IFN-alpha-2a (P = .048). Twenty-two percent of the patients receiving the combination stopped treatment due to toxicity, as compared with 16% on IFN-alpha-2a. CONCLUSION: Progression-free and overall survival for patients with progressive metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with IFN-alpha-2a plus 13-CRA were significantly longer compared with patients on IFN-alpha-2a alone (P = .007 and P = .048, respectively). Improvement in efficacy in the combination arm was accompanied by increased, though not serious, toxicity.     

Subcutaneous recombinant interleukin-2 plus alpha interferon and vinblastine in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

The management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) constitutes a therapeutic challenge and no standard therapy has yet been established. This phase II study aimed to verify the efficacy and tolerability of subcutaneous low dose recombinant interleukin-2 (IL-2) plus alpha interferon (IFN) and vinblastine (VLB) in patients with metastatic RCC. Twenty-three evaluable adult patients were enrolled in the study. A total of 19 patients were previously subjected to radical nephrectomy and four had been treated with adjuvant immunotherapy. The I-nest frequent metastatic sites were lung/pleura, bone, liver, lymph nodes, and abdominal mass. The following treatment schedule was administered: VLB at 6 mg/m(2) on day 1: IL-2 at 4.5 million IU twice daily from day 1 to 5 and day 8 to 12; IFN at 3 million IU three times weekly intramuscularly. The therapy was recycled every 21 days, except for the IFN which was administered continuously. Five patients demonstrated remission (21.6%) including one complete response persisting for 6 months, and four partial responses with a duration of 41+, 20, 8, and 18+ months. Moreover, 15 patients (65%) showed stable disease for 4-20 months (median 6 months), and three patients progressed. Overall median survival of the 23 patients was 11 months, with 27+ months for responders, 11 months for patients with stable disease, and 8 months for patients with rapid progression. Regressions occurred in lung, pleura, bone, and abdominal mass. Treatment was relatively well tolerated and easily manageable. This study was mainly administered as outpatient care. This study confirms the manageability and tolerability of subcutaneous IL-2 used in association with IFN alpha and chemotherapy. Even though a minority of patients responded, the duration of responses and the high percentage of long stable diseases represent the most interesting aspect of this study.     

A randomized Phase II study of interleukin-2 with and without beta-interferon for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study (PZ586).

Interleukin-2 (IL-2) and beta-interferon (beta-IFN) are biologic agents with antitumor activity observed in preclinical models. Some studies of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with IL-2 report relatively long survival, despite low response rates. Seventy-six evaluable patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer were treated in a randomized Phase II study with either IL-2 alone or IL-2 plus beta-IFN. Patients received either IL-2 at 6 x 10(6) Cetus units/m2 3 days weekly or the combination of IL-2 at 5 x 10(6) Cetus units/m2 plus beta-IFN at 6 x 10(6) units/m2, both given 3 days weekly. Both biologic agents were administered by intravenous bolus injection on an outpatient basis. Objective responses were observed in 3/76 (4%)) patients. Grade 4 toxicity occurred in 3/39 patients treated with IL-2 alone, and in 4/37 patients treated with IL-2 plus beta-IFN. An additional lethal respiratory toxicity occurred in a patient who received IL-2 plus beta-IFN. The median survival of all patients treated on this study was 33 weeks. Despite producing only a 4% objective response rate. IL-2 appears to have a favorable impact on survival comparable to chemotherapy. The role for this immune therapy in the management of non-small cell lung cancer requires further study.     

Prospective, randomized, multicenter, double-blind placebo-controlled trial comparing adjuvant interferon alfa and isotretinoin with interferon alfa alone in stage IIA and IIB melanoma: European Cooperative Adjuvant Melanoma Treatment Study Group.

PURPOSE: The combination of interferon alfa (IFNalpha) and isotretinoin has shown a direct antiproliferative effect on human melanoma cell lines, but it remained unclear whether this combination is more effective than IFNalpha alone in patients with metastatic melanoma. We evaluated safety and efficacy of IFNalpha and isotretinoin compared with IFNalpha alone as adjuvant treatment in patients with primary malignant melanoma stage IIA and IIB. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 407 melanoma patients in stage IIA (301 patients) and IIB (106 patients) were randomly assigned to either IFNalpha and isotretinoin (isotretinoin group; 206 patients) or IFNalpha and placebo (placebo group; 201 patients) after excision of the primary tumor. IFNalpha was administered three times a week at a dose of 3 million units subcutaneously for 24 months. Isotretinoin at a dose of 20 mg for patients < or = 73 kg, 30 mg for patients greater than 73 kg, or placebo daily for 24 months. RESULTS: A scheduled interim analysis revealed no significant differences in survival rates, with the isotretinoin group and the placebo group showing 5-year disease-free survival rates of 55% (95% CI, 46% to 65%) and 67% (95% CI, 59% to 75%), respectively, and overall 5-year survival rates of 76% (95% CI, 67% to 84%) and 81% (95% CI, 74% to 88%), respectively. The trial was stopped for futility. CONCLUSION: The addition of isotretinoin to an adjuvant treatment of low-dose IFNalpha in patients with stage IIA and IIB melanoma had no significant effect on disease-free or overall survival and is therefore not recommended.     

A randomised study with subcutaneous low-dose interleukin 2 alone vs interleukin 2 plus the pineal neurohormone melatonin in advanced solid neoplasms other than renal cancer and melanoma.

Our previous experimental studies have shown that the best approach to increase the biological anti-tumour activity of interleukin 2 (IL-2) is not co-administration of another cytokine, but the association with immunomodulating neurohormones, in an attempt to reproduce the physiological links between psychoendocrine and immune systems, which play a fundamental role in the regulation of the immune responses. In particular, the association with the pineal neurohormone melatonin (MLT) has been shown to cause tumour regressions in neoplasms that are generally non-responsive to IL-2 alone. To confirm these preliminary results, a clinical trial was performed in locally advanced or metastatic patients with solid tumours other than renal cell cancer and melanoma. The study included 80 consecutive patients, who were randomised to be treated with IL-2 alone subcutaneously (3 million IU day-1 at 8.00 p.m. 6 days a week for 4 weeks) or IL-2 plus MLT (40 mg day-1 orally at 8.00 p.m. every day starting 7 days before IL-2). A complete response was obtained in 3/41 patients treated with IL-2 plus MLT and in none of the patients receiving IL-2 alone. A partial response was achieved in 8/41 patients treated with IL-2 plus MLT and in only 1/39 patients treated with IL-2 alone. Tumour objective regression rate was significantly higher in patients treated with IL-2 and MLT than in those receiving IL-2 alone (11/41 vs 1/39, P < 0.001). The survival at 1 year was significantly higher in patients treated with IL-2 and MLT than in the IL-2 group (19/41 vs 6/39, P < 0.05). Finally, the mean increase in lymphocyte and eosinophil number was significantly higher in the IL-2 plus MLT group than in patients treated with IL-2 alone; on the contrary, the mean increase in the specific marker of macrophage activation neopterin was significantly higher in patients treated with IL-2 alone. The treatment was well tolerated in both groups of patients. This study shows that the concomitant administration of the pineal hormone MLT may increase the efficacy of low-dose IL-2 subcutaneous therapy.     

吉西他滨联合奥沙利铂治疗进展期胰腺癌（附40例）

目的：观察吉西他滨（择菲GEM）联合奥沙利铂（艾恒OXA）组成的GEMOX方案治疗进展期胰腺癌的有效性和安全性。方法：进展期胰腺癌40例,应用GEM800mg／m2静滴半小时,d1,d3;OXA60mg／m2静滴2小时,d2,d9;21天重复。至少接受2个周期的化疗,按照WHO标准进行评价。结果：观察化疗后肿瘤原发病灶的变化情况及化疗的不良反应。临床有效率为17．5％,具有较好的耐受性,不良反应主要有骨髓抑制和消化系统反应。结论：健择联合艾恒治疗进展期胰腺癌疗效较好,不良反应可以耐受。     

Multicenter randomized phase III trial comparing protracted venous infusion (PVI) fluorouracil (5-FU) with PVI 5-FU plus mitomycin in inoperable pancreatic cancer.

PURPOSE: To compare protracted venous infusion (PVI) fluorouracil (5-FU) with PVI 5-FU plus mitomycin (MMC) in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer in a multicenter, prospectively randomized study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred eight patients were randomized to PVI 5-FU (300 mg/m(2)/d for a maximum of 24 weeks) or PVI 5-FU plus MMC (7 mg/m(2) every 6 weeks for four courses). The major end points were tumor response, survival, toxicity, and quality of life (QOL). RESULTS: The two treatment groups were balanced for baseline demographic factors, and 62% had metastatic disease. The overall response rate was 8.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]) 3.2% to 13.7% for patients treated with PVI 5-FU alone compared with 17.6%; 95% CI 10.3% to 25.1% for PVI 5-FU plus MMC (P =.04). Median failure-free survival was 2.8 months for PVI 5-FU and 3.8 months for PVI 5-FU plus MMC (P =.14). Median survival was 5.1 months for PVI 5-FU and 6.5 months for PVI 5-FU plus MMC (P =.34). Toxicities in both arms were mild. There was an increased incidence of neutropenia in the 5-FU plus MMC arm (P <.01), although no differences in infection were seen. No patients developed hemolytic uremic syndrome. Global QOL improved significantly after 24 weeks of treatment compared with baseline for patients receiving 5-FU plus MMC, although there was no statistically significant difference in QOL between arms. CONCLUSION: PVI 5-FU plus MMC resulted in a superior response rate in comparison with PVI 5-FU alone in advanced pancreatic cancer, but this did not translate into a survival advantage. These results emphasize the importance of chemotherapy in this setting and the continuing value of the fluoropyrimidines in pancreatic cancer.     

Recombinant alpha-interferon and vinblastine in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: efficacy of low doses

Twenty-six patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) were treated in a phase I-II trial with recombinant interferon alpha-2b (alpha-IFN) and vinblastine (VBL) in combination. Patients received IFN at a starting dose of 3 x 10(6) IU/m2 subcutaneously three times a week and VBL 0.1 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks, with dose modification for toxicity. All patients were evaluable for toxicity; 18 patients were evaluable for efficacy. An objective response rate of 44% was observed (eight of 18 patients, with one complete response and seven partial responses). The median duration of response was 5 months. The actuarial survival of responding patients was significantly longer than that of nonresponding patients. In general, the toxicity was tolerable; the subjective toxicity and fever were similar to that reported for the same doses of IFN alone. Only a mild neurotoxicity, usually mixed polyneuropathy, occurred with increased frequency. Alpha-IFN and VBL administered at low doses in combination demonstrated the highest response rate so far reported in RCC without significant toxicity.     

Phase II and biologic study of interferon alfa, retinoic acid, and cisplatin in advanced squamous skin cancer.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to test interferon alfa (IFNalpha), 13-cis-retinoic acid (13cRA), and cisplatin biochemotherapy in advanced squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the skin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced skin SCC received IFNalpha (5 x 10(6) IU/m(2), subcutaneous injection, three times a week), 13cRA (1 mg/kg, orally, daily), and cisplatin (20 mg/m(2), intravenous injection, weekly) in a phase II trial. The growth inhibition, cell-cycle, and apoptosis activity of these agents was evaluated in two skin SCC cell lines (SRB1-m7 and SRB12-p9). RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients were enrolled. All were assessable for survival, 35 for response and toxicity (median follow-up was 38 months). The overall and complete response rates were 34% and 17%, respectively, with median durations of 9 and 35.4 months, respectively. The response rate was higher in locally advanced (67%) than metastatic (17%) disease (P =.007). Median survival was 14.6 months. One-, 2-, and 5-year survival rate estimates were 58%, 32%, and 21%, respectively. Toxicity included generally mild to moderate fatigue and mucocutaneous dryness, moderate to severe neutropenia (38%), and neutropenic fever (6%). There were no treatment-related deaths. In vitro growth inhibition and apoptosis effects of cisplatin were differential and inversely associated with those of retinoic acid and especially IFNalpha in two skin SCC lines. CONCLUSION: The rising incidence, morbidity, and mortality of advanced skin SCC are a major challenge for clinical oncologists. Combined 13cRA, IFNalpha, and cisplatin was clinically active in extensive locally advanced disease. Each agent had independent, non-cross-resistant biologic effects in vitro, which may account for the combination's clinical activity.     

Second-Line Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin Combination for Gemcitabine-Resistant Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

Background: The role of second-line therapy in metastatic pancreatic cancer is not clear. In this study, we aimed to explore the second-line efficiency of capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX) in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who have received gemcitabine-based first-line therapy. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 47 patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer previously treated with gemcitabine-based first-line regimens. Treatment consisted of oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 and capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 twice daily with a 3 week interval, until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. Results: Median number of cycles was 4 (range, 2-10). The overall disease control rate was 38.3%. The median overall survival and progression-free survival from the start of second-line therapy were 23 weeks (95%CI: 16.6-29.5 weeks) and 12 weeks (95%CI: 9.8-14.4 weeks), respectively. The most common grade 3-4 toxicities were nausea, vomiting and hematologic side effects. Conclusions: Our result suggests that the combination of capecitabine and oxaliplatin was tolerated with manageable toxicity and showed encouraging activity as second-line treatment of advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer patients with ECOG performance status 0-2.     

Investigating the potential of bevacizumab in other indications: metastatic renal cell, non-small cell lung, pancreatic and breast cancer

Bevacizumab (Avastin) has unprecedented survival benefit in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Trials are already in progress to investigate the potential of bevacizumab in indications including metastatic renal cell cancer (RCC), non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), pancreatic cancer, breast and ovarian cancer. Bevacizumab offers the potential to increase survival without substantially altering the toxicity profile in these tumor types. Bevacizumab has shown activity in patients with refractory metastatic RCC, where progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly longer in patients treated with bevacizumab (10 mg/kg every 2 weeks) than those treated with placebo (hazard ratio=2.55, p<0.001). In addition, combining bevacizumab with erlotinib (Tarceva) has shown a median time to progression of more than 11 months. In NSCLC, a phase II trial revealed that adding bevacizumab to chemotherapy increased therapeutic benefit compared with chemotherapy alone. Adverse events were mild and easily managed, but six patients receiving bevacizumab developed severe hemoptysis. Entry criteria for NSCLC trials have been adjusted to exclude patients with squamous cell histology to try to avoid this issue. Adding bevacizumab (10 mg/kg) to the current standard of care, gemcitabine, in stage IV pancreatic cancer has also shown promising efficacy. Partial responses were seen in 19% of patients, with a further 48% having stable disease. Several ongoing clinical trials are also studying bevacizumab with various chemotherapy and radiotherapy regimens. Bevacizumab combined with carboplatin (Paraplatin)/paclitaxel (Taxol) was further examined in a phase III randomized trial that accrued 878 patients with advanced non-squamous cell NSCLC. Patients given chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) plus bevacizumab had a higher response rate, longer PFS and an increase in survival compared with patients on chemotherapy alone. Both regimens were generally well tolerated. Bevacizumab has also shown activity in patients with metastatic breast cancer. In 715 patients, a significant, 2-fold increase in response rate was observed in patients receiving bevacizumab plus paclitaxel compared with paclitaxel alone. Median PFS was also significantly increased (p<0.001). Bevacizumab has the potential to provide significant efficacy benefits for patients with metastatic RCC, NSCLC, pancreatic cancer, and other tumor types when used first line in combination with standard therapy.     

Sorafenib with interleukin-2 vs sorafenib alone in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: the ROSORC trial

Background:

Preclinical investigations support combining sorafenib with IL-2 in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

Methods:

In this open-label, phase II study, 128 patients with mRCC were randomised to receive oral sorafenib, 400 mg twice daily, plus subcutaneous IL-2, 4.5 million international units (MIU) five times per week for 6 in every 8 weeks, or sorafenib alone. After enrolment of the first 40 patients, IL-2 dose was reduced to improve the tolerability.

Results:

After a median follow-up of 27 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 33 weeks with sorafenib plus IL-2, and 30 weeks with sorafenib alone (P=0.109). For patients receiving the initial higher dose of IL-2, median PFS was 43 weeks vs 31 weeks for those receiving the lower dose. The most common adverse events were asthenia, hand–foot syndrome, hypertension, and diarrhoea. Grade 3–4 adverse events were reported for 38 and 25% of patients receiving combination and single-agent treatment, respectively.

Conclusion:

The combination of sorafenib and IL-2 did not demonstrate improved efficacy vs sorafenib alone. Improvements in PFS appeared greater in patients receiving higher-dose IL-2.     

Downregulation of Bcl-2 sensitises interferon-resistant renal cancer cells to Fas

Interferon alpha (IFNalpha) is used to treat patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) despite limited clinical benefit. IFNalpha can induce Fas receptor-mediated apoptosis by direct activation of pro-caspase-8 followed by activation of caspase-3. Alternative, indirect activation of caspase-3 via mitochondrial release of cytochrome c can occur and may explain the rescue from Fas-activated cell death by the antiapoptotic members of the Bcl-2 family. In this study, we examined G3139, a novel antisense compound targeting Bcl-2, in combination with IFNalpha. Human RCC lines (SK-RC-44 and SK-RC-07) were treated with IFNalpha, G3139 or a combination of the two. Fas-mediated cytotoxicity was induced by anti-Fas mAb, CH11. An analysis of Bcl-2, Fas and the cleavage of PARP was performed. IFNalpha induced Fas and Bcl-2 in SK-RC-44 and SK-RC-07. IFNalpha sensitised SK-RC-44 to anti-Fas and induced PARP cleavage confirming that IFNalpha has a cytotoxic effect on RCC lines by induction of the Fas antigen. Cytotoxicity was not evident in SK-RC-07 cells treated with IFNalpha. G3139 induced a specific downregulation of Bcl-2 in SK-RC-07 cells, which were then sensitised to anti-Fas after treatment with IFNalpha. Taken together, these results suggest that Fas-dependent pathways as well as alternative pathways, which can be inhibited by Bcl-2, exist in renal cell carcinoma. G3139 in combination with IFNalpha is a potential therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.     

Gemcitabine combined with oxaliplatin in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: final results of a GERCOR multicenter phase II study.

PURPOSE: Based on preclinical in vitro synergy data, this study evaluated the activity and toxicity of a gemcitabine/oxaliplatin combination in patients with metastatic and locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Previously untreated metastatic and locally advanced unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients were enrolled onto this multicenter phase II study. Patients received gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) as a 10-mg/m(2)/min infusion on day 1 and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m(2) as a 2-hour infusion on day 2 every 2 weeks. Patients with metastatic disease were treated until evidence of progressive disease, whereas patients with locally advanced disease received six cycles in the absence of progression, followed when appropriate by concomitant radiochemotherapy. RESULTS: Among 64 eligible patients included in eight centers, 30 had locally advanced and 34 had metastatic disease. Response rate for the 62 patients with measurable disease was 30.6% (95% confidence interval, 19.7% to 42.3%), 31.0% for locally advanced and 30.3% for metastatic patients. Among 58 assessable patients, 40% had clinical benefit. Median progression-free survival and median overall survival (OS) were 5.3 and 9.2 months, respectively, with 36% of patients alive at 1 year. Median OS for patients with metastatic disease and locally advanced disease were 8.7 and 11.5 months, respectively. With 574 treatment cycles (median per patient, nine; range, zero to 27), grade 3/4 toxicity per patient was 11% for neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, 14% for nausea or vomiting, 6.2% for diarrhea, and 11% for peripheral neuropathy, with no toxic deaths. CONCLUSION: Palliative effects, response rate, and survival observed with this well-tolerated gemcitabine/oxaliplatin combination deserve additional evaluation. A comparative study of combination therapy versus gemcitabine alone is ongoing.