胃癌的微卫星不稳定性与hMLH1基因启动子甲基化的关系

背景与目的:由于细胞错配修复功能缺陷而导致基因组微卫星序列高度不稳定是遗传性非息肉性大肠癌发生的主要原因。以往的研究表明胃癌组织也有错配修复蛋白表达的缺失,但错配修复基因突变频率却很低;而启动子的甲基化是肿瘤抑癌基因失活的主要途径,也可能是错配修复基因功能丧失的主要原因。本研究拟通过对胃癌组织的微卫星不稳定性的分析及对hMLH1基因启动子甲基化和蛋白表达的检测,对胃癌发病的分子机制进行探讨。方法:从52例胃癌患者的癌组织及其周围组织提取DNA,PCR扩增基因组的5个微卫星位点BAT-26、D17S261、D3S1283、D2S123和D3S1611,毛细管电泳后,判定胃癌组织的微卫星不稳定性;免疫组织化学方法检测hMLH1蛋白的表达;酶切法检测hMLH1基因启动子甲基化。结果:52例胃癌标本中微卫星高度不稳定13例,低度不稳定2例,稳定37例。微卫星高度不稳定的13例胃癌组织中,均检测到hMLH1基因启动子甲基化(100.0%);微卫星低度不稳定和微卫星稳定的39例胃癌组织中,hMLH1基因启动子甲基化仅1例(2.6%),前者发生率高于后者,两者之间有显著性差异(P<0.01)。微卫星高度不稳定的13例胃癌的癌旁组织中,hMLH1基因启动子甲基化6例(46.2%),而微卫星低度不稳定和微卫星稳定39例胃癌的癌旁肿瘤组织标本中,hMLH1基因启动子甲基     

Methylation of the hMLH1 promoter but no hMLH1 mutations in sporadic gastric carcinomas with high-level microsatellite instability

Microsatellite instability (MSI) in tumors from patients with hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is caused by germline mutations in mismatch repair (MMR) genes, principally hMSH2 and hMLH1. In contrast, somatic mutations in MMR genes are relatively rare in sporadic MSI(+) colon cancers. Rather, the majority of mutation-negative, MSI(+) cases involve hypermethylation of the hMLH1 promoter and subsequent lack of expression of hMLH1. The details of the mechanisms of this epigenetic gene silencing remain to be elucidated. In some colon cancer cell lines, hMLH1 promoter methylation is accompanied by mutation of 1 of the 2 alleles, whereas in other cell lines and tumors, such combinations have not been reported. To contribute to the characterization of MSI in gastric cancer and to directly investigate whether hMLH1 promoter methylation is accompanied by gene mutation in these cancers, we have analyzed 42 gastric tumors and corresponding normal tissue for MSI, hypermethylation of the hMLH1 promoter, and mutations in hMLH1 as well as hMSH2. We found that 10 (23.8%) of 42 cases of sporadic gastric cancer were MSI(+) and that 8 had at least 2 of 12 altered microsatellite loci. All samples with at least 2 altered loci exhibited methylation of the hMLH1 promoter region, but none had detectable mutations in hMLH1 or hMSH2. Our results confirm the importance of methylation of the hMLH1 promoter region in MSI(+) gastric tumors and suggest that methylation takes place in the absence of hMLH1 mutations in these tumors.     

Hypermethylation of the hMLH1 gene promoter in solitary and multiple gastric cancers with microsatellite instability

Human cancers with a high frequency microsatellite instability phenotype develop due to defects in DNA mismatch repair genes. Silencing of a DNA mismatch repair gene, hMLH1 gene, by promoter hypermethylation is a frequent cause of the microsatellite instability-H phenotype. Using methylation specific PCR we investigated the methylation status of the hMLH1 gene promoter in 17 solitary gastric cancers (12 microsatellite instability-H and five microsatellite stable tumours from 17 patients), and 13 multiple gastric cancers (eight microsatellite instability-H, one low frequency microsatellite instability-L and four microsatellite stable tumours from five patients) and also examined non-cancerous gastric mucosa both adjacent to and distant from each tumour. Expression of hMLH1 protein was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. All microsatellite instability-H tumours (20 out of 20) had evidence of methylation of hMLH1 promoter, whereas only one out of 10 microsatellite instability-L and microsatellite stable tumours did (P<0.0000005), and the methylation status correlated with hMLH1 protein expression (P<0.000003). Furthermore, methylation of the hMLH1 promoter was detected in 50% (6 out of 12) and 63% (5 out of 8) of non-cancerous gastric mucosa samples adjacent to, and in 33% (4 out of 12) and 40% (2 out of 5) of those obtained from distant portion of, solitary and multiple cancers with microsatellite instability-H. Thus both solitary and multiple gastric cancers with microsatellite instability-H have evidence of similar high levels of hMLH1 promoter hypermethylation in the surrounding non-cancerous tissue. Hypermethylation of the hMLH1 promoter occurs in non-cancerous gastric mucosa of microsatellite instability-H tumours and may increase the risk of subsequent neoplasia.     

Analysis for microsatellite instability and mutations of the DNA mismatch repair gene hMLH1 in familial gastric cancer

We examined 30 gastric-cancer patients with a varying degree of family history of stomach cancer and/or synchronous gastric tumors for microsatellite instability. We observed microsatellite instability at at least 1 of 8 loci tested in tumors of 14/30 patients; of these 14, 8 had single locus alterations and 6 had alterations at at least half of the 8 loci. Among the patients with microsatellite instability at >=4 loci, 3 patients showed a strong familial clustering of gastric cancer. Mutation analysis of the DNA mismatch repair gene hMLH1 on paired non-tumorous and tumor DNA from 10 patients 6 with microsatellite instability at 24 loci and 4 with an alteration at one locus, revealed a novel missense mutation, present in the normal and tumor DNA of one patient with microsatellite instability at multiple loci in his tumor. His family history of cancer included one second-degree relative affected with gastric cancer. These data suggest that germline mutations in the hMLH1 gene occur in some gastric-cancer patients and that in the majority of cases microsatellite instability in gastric tumors may be due to defects in other genes responsible for DNA replication fidelity than the hMLH1. © 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Hypermethylation of the hMLH1 gene promoter is associated with microsatellite instability in early human gastric neoplasia

A significant portion of gastric cancers exhibit defective DNA mismatch repair, manifested as microsatellite instability (MSI). High-frequency MSI (MSI-H) is associated with hypermethylation of the human mut-L homologue 1 (hMLH1) mismatch repair gene promoter and diminished hMLH1 expression in advanced gastric cancers. However, the relationship between MSI and hMLH1 hypermethylation has not been studied in early gastric neoplasms. We therefore investigated hMLH1 hypermethylation, hMLH1 expression and MSI in a group of early gastric cancers and gastric adenomas. Sixty-four early gastric neoplasms were evaluated, comprising 28 adenomas, 18 mucosal carcinomas, and 18 carcinomas with superficial submucosal invasion but clear margins. MSI was evaluated using multiplex fluorescent PCR to amplify loci D2S123, D5S346, D17S250, BAT 25 and BAT 26. Methylation-specific PCR was performed to determine the methylation status of hMLH1. In two hypermethylated MSI-H cancers, hMLH1 protein expression was also evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Six of sixty-four early gastric lesions were MSI-H, comprising 1 adenoma, 4 mucosal carcinomas, and 1 carcinoma with superficial submucosal invasion. Two lesions (one adenoma and one mucosal carcinoma) demonstrated low-frequency MSI (MSI-L). The remaining 56 neoplasms were MSI-stable (MSI-S). Six of six MSI-H, one of two MSI-L, and none of thirty MSI-S lesions showed hMLH1 hypermethylation (P<0.001). Diminished hMLH1 protein expression was demonstrated by immunohistochemistry in two of two MSI-H hypermethylated lesions. hMLH1 promoter hypermethylation is significantly associated with MSI and diminished hMLH1 expression in early gastric neoplasms. MSI and hypermethylation-associated inactivation of hMLH1 are more prevalent in early gastric cancers than in gastric adenomas. Thus, hypermethylation-associated inactivation of the hMLH1 gene can occur early in gastric carcinogenesis.     

Analysis of Inactivation of hMLH1 by Promoter Hypermethylation and Microsatellite Instability in Gastric Carcinogenesis

OBJECTIVE To study the microsatellite instability (MSI) and methylation state of the hMLH1 gene promoter and their mechanisms underlying the development of gastric cancer. METHODS Forty-one gastric cancer samples were obtained from patients undergoing surgery and 46 chronic atrophic gastritis tissues with dysplasia or intestinal metaplasia (IM) were obtained from patients undergoing gastro-endoscopy. Fourteen normal gastric mucosal samples were used as controls. Genomic DNA was extracted from the samples and 5 microsatellite markers were used to measure MSI. Methylation-specific PCR (MSP) was used to screen the methylation state of the samples. DNA sequencing and immunohistochemistry were performed to verify the results. RESULTS MSI was identified in 22 out of the 41 (53.7%) gastric cancers, of which 8 cases showed high-level MSI (2 or more loci altered) and 14 showed low-level MSI (1 locus altered). MSI was also detected in 12 out of 46 (26.1%) pre-cancerous lesions of the stomach, whereas it was not seen in the normal tissue. Moreover, hMLH1 hypermethylation was detected in 17 out of the 41 (41.5%) gastric cancers, 9 out of the 46 (19.6%) pre-cancerous lesions and 0 out of the 14 normal tissue. Significant differences in frequency of MSI and hMLH1 promoter methylation were observed among gastric cancers, precancerous lesions and normal gastric tissue. Gastric samples with MSI had a tendency to be hypermethylated in the hMLH1 promoter. DNA sequencing and immunohistochemistry results also confirmed that hMLH1 promoter methylation could lead to loss of the hMLH1 protein and gene silence which sequentely resulted in gene mismatch and MSI. CONCLUSION Accumulation of MSI and hMLH1 promoter methylation may be important early molecular events during gastric carcinogenesis and may contribute to the acquisition of a transformed cell phenotype and the development of gastric cancer.     

Evidence of tumor microsatellite instability in gastric cancer with familial aggregation

About 90% of gastric cancer (GC) cases appear in a sporadic setting. Nonetheless, in high incidence areas high familial aggregation rates have been recently described. Microsatellite instability (MSI) is thought to be an important molecular phenotype both in sporadic GC and in tumors of the HNPCC spectrum. The aim of this study was to assess the frequency of MSI in GC with familial aggregation. Five quasimonomorphic mononucleotide repeats (BAT-26, BAT-25, NR-24, NR-21 and NR-27) were analyzed in 250 GC patients. Seventy-five patients (30%) had at least one-first-degree family member affected by GC and 63 patients (25.2%) showed MSI. The frequency of MSI was significantly higher in patients with a positive family history of GC (38.7%) compared to patients with other tumor types within the family (15.7%) or with a negative oncological familial history (21.9%, P = 0.004). Within cases with a positive familial oncological history, the MSI frequency in families with GC only was similar to the one observed in families with GC and colon cancer (P = 0.96). Nonetheless, in families with GC and lung cancer, the frequency of MSI was significantly lower (5.6%, P = 0.007). MSI occurs in GCs with familial aggregation. Similar MSI rates have been observed in GC patients with other family members affected by GC or colon cancer. The same does not occur in families with other members affected by lung cancer. Our data seem to suggest that familial aggregation for either GC alone or gastric and colon cancer share common etiological factors in contrast to families with gastric and lung cancers. C. Pedrazzani and G. Corso are contributed equally.     

Expression of hMLH1 is inactivated in the gastric adenomas with enhanced microsatellite instability.

Microsatellite instability (MSI) and frameshift mutations in the genes containing coding nucleotide repeats have been reported in a subset of gastric adenomas, however the inactivation profiles of DNA mismatch repair genes in MSI-positive gastric adenomas have not been characterized. To address the origin of MSI in gastric adenomas, expressions of hMLH1 and hMSH2 were explored in 86 gastric adenomas. Gastric carcinomas, of which 16 were MSI-positive and 22 MSI-negative, were used as controls. MSI was found in 15 (17%) of gastric adenomas. Absent or decreased hMLH1 expression by immunohistochemistry was noted in most of the MSI-positive adenomas (13/15, 87%) and carcinomas (14/16, 88%), and all of these tumours showed methylation of the hMLH1 gene promoter. In contrast, rare inactivation of hMLH1 expression was found in MSI-negative adenomas (3/71, 4%) and carcinomas (2/22, 9%). Intense expression of hMSH2 gene product was observed in most of the gastric adenomas and carcinomas regardless of MSI status. These findings indicate that the inactivation of hMLH1 gene expression by promoter methylation is an early event and might be the origin of MSI-positive gastric adenomas.     

Methylation of hMLH1 promoter correlates with the gene silencing with a region-specific manner in colorectal cancer

Microsatellite instability is present in over 80% of the hereditary non-polyposis colorectal carcinoma and about 15-20% of the sporadic cancer. Microsatellite instability is caused by the inactivation of the mismatch repair genes, such as primarily hMLH1, hMSH2. To study the mechanisms of the inactivation of mismatch repair genes in colorectal cancers, especially the region-specific methylation of hMLH1 promoter and its correlation with gene expression, we analysed microsatellite instability, expression and methylation of hMLH1 and loss of heterozygosity at hMLH1 locus in these samples. Microsatellite instability was present in 17 of 71 primary tumours of colorectal cancer, including 14 of 39 (36%) mucinous cancer and three of 32 (9%) non-mucinous cancer. Loss of hMLH1 and hMSH2 expression was detected in nine and three of 16 microsatellite instability tumours respectively. Methylation at CpG sites in a proximal region of hMLH1 promoter was detected in seven of nine tumours that showed no hMLH1 expression, while no methylation was present in normal mucosa and tumours which express hMLH1. However, methylation in the distal region was observed in all tissues including normal mucosa and hMLH1 expressing tumours. This observation indicates that methylation of hMLH1 promoter plays an important role in microsatellite instability with a region-specific manner in colorectal cancer. Loss of heterozygosity at hMLH1 locus was present in four of 17 cell lines and 16 of 54 tumours with normal hMLH1 status, while loss of heterozygosity was absent in all nine cell lines and nine tumours with abnormal hMLH1 status (mutation or loss of expression), showing loss of heterozygosity is not frequently involved in the inactivation of hMLH1 gene in sporadic colorectal cancer.     

Oncogenic mutations in gastric cancer with microsatellite instability

Aim

Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascade and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) survival pathways are frequently activated in the progression of gastrointestinal malignancies. In this study, we aimed to determine the frequency of gene mutations in members of these pathways - Epithelial Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR), KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA and MLK3 in a series of 63 gastric carcinomas with high levels of microsatellite instability (MSI).

Methods

Gene mutation analysis was performed by PCR amplification followed by direct sequencing. In selected tumour cases, EGFR expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Association studies between molecular data and clinicopathologic characteristics were performed.

Results

Mutations in EGFR (3′-untranslated region [UTR] polyA repeat), KRAS, PIK3CA and MLK3 genes occurred in 30 (47.6%), 11 (17.5%), 9 (14.3%) and 2 (3.2%) of the MSI gastric cancer (GC) cases, respectively. No BRAF or EGFR hotspot mutations were identified. Overall, mutations in at least one of these genes were found in 55.6% (35/63) of gastric carcinomas. From those mutant cases 40.0% (14/35) of them had concomitant gene mutations, always involving EGFR polyA deletions. Interestingly, we observed significant associations between oncogenic mutations and female gender (p = 0.046) old age of diagnosis (p = 0.001) and intestinal subtype (p = 0.043).

Conclusion

Our results show that MSI gastric carcinoma frequently shows activation of EGFR-MAPK and PI3K pathways. Within all alterations found, deletions of the A13 repeats of EGFR were common, suggesting this molecular event as an important biomarker for stratification of GC patients for treatment with EGFR inhibitors.     

胃癌组织hMLH1启动子甲基化是造成其蛋白表达降低的主要原因

目的：通过研究胃癌中错配修复基因hMLH1启动子区5CpG岛甲基化及蛋白表达情况，探讨hMLH1启动子Ⅸ甲基化对蛋白表达的影响及在胃癌发病中的作用。方法：收集诊断明确且未经放化疗的胃癌手术切除标本41例及同病例癌旁黏膜。应用免疫组化SP法检测标本hMLH1蛋白表达情况。应用甲基化特异性PCR（MSP）榆测标本hMLH1启动子区甲基化情况。结果：胃癌组与癌旁组，hMLH1蛋白阳性表达率分别为58．54％（24／41）和80．49％（33／41）（P〈0．05）；启动子甲基化率分别为80．49％（33／41）和24．39％（10／41）（P〈0．05）；完全甲基化率分别为41．46％（17／41）和19．51％（8／41）（P〈0．05）；部分甲基化率分别为39．02％（16／41）和4．88％（2／41）（P〈0．05）。无论胃癌组织还是癌旁组织，完全甲基化病例均出现hMLH1蛋白表达缺失，部分甲基化病例和启动子未甲基化病例均有hMLH1蛋白表达。hMLHI基因启动子甲基化率与胃癌患者性别、年龄、癌组织分化程度、浸润深度和淋巴结转移均无明显相关性（P〉0．05）。结论：hM—LH1基因启动子甲基化是导致hMLH1蛋白表达降低的主要原因；胃黏膜hMLH1蛋白表达降低有助于胃癌的预警。     

CHFR promoter hypermethylation in colon cancer correlates with the microsatellite instability phenotype

A subset of sporadic colon cancers has been shown to have microsatellite instability caused by an epigenetic inactivation of the MLH1 gene by hypermethylation of the the CpG island in its promoter region. We report here that in colorectal cancer, inactivation of the MLH1 gene is frequently accompanied by hypermethylation of the CpG island in the promoter of the mitotic gene checkpoint with forkhead and ring finger domains (CHFR). This was first observed in the colon cancer cell lines HCT-116, DLD-1, RKO and HT29. Among the 61 primary colon cancer samples studied, hypermethylation of the MLH1 and the CHFR promoter was found in 31% of the tumors. In 68% of all primary cancers (13/19) with MLH1 promoter hypermethylation, hypermethylation of the CHFR promoter was observed as well (P-value < 0.0001, Fisher's two-sided exact). Hypermethylation of the HLTF, MGMT, RASSF1, APC, p14 and p16 promoter regions were also frequent events, being observed in 48% (28/58), 40% (26/64), 21% (14/64), 50% (31/62), 43% (26/60) and 56% (35/63), respectively. However, methylation of these genes was not associated with methylation of either MLH1 or CHFR. The observed methylation profile was unrelated to Duke's stage. The coordinated loss of both mismatch repair caused by methylation of MLH1 and loss of checkpoint control associated with methylation of CHFR suggests the potential to overcome cell cycle checkpoints, which may lead to an accumulation of mutations.     

Age-related hypermethylation of the hMLH1 promoter in gastric cancers.

To determine whether methylation of the hMLH1 promoter is related to increasing age and gastric carcinogenesis, we examined hMLH1 methylation and expression in 100 gastric cancers. hMLH1 methylation and aberrant protein expression were observed in 9 and 13 cancers, respectively. Normal and intestinal metaplastic tissues adjacent to cancers with hypermethylation did not exhibit any hMLH1 methylation, indicating that it may be specific to gastric cancers. The frequency of hMLH1 methylation significantly increased with age. These results suggest that hMLH1 methylation plays an important role in gastric carcinogenesis in old people.     

Microsatellite instability caused by hMLH1 promoter methylation increases with tumor progression in right-sided sporadic colorectal cancer

OBJECTIVE: A subset of sporadic colorectal cancers (SCRCs) exhibits microsatellite instability (MSI). Most MSI in SCRCs is caused by hMLH1 inactivation due to promoter methylation. However, the role of MSI in the progression of SCRCs remains unclear. METHODS: Thirty-two intramucosal cancers and 63 cancers with submucosal invasion were assigned to group 1 (early-stage cancer), and 30 Dukes' B and 26 Dukes' C cancers to group 2 (advanced-stage cancer). hMLH1 promoter methylation status was determined by methylation-specific PCR. MSI was determined using five markers. hMLH1 expression was determined immunohistochemically. RESULTS: MSI was found in 1 of 95 (1.1%) tumors in group 1, compared with 4 of 56 (7.1%) tumors in group 2. In right-sided tumors, the overall frequency of hMLH1-methylation-positive tumors in group 1 was not significantly different from that in group 2 (17 of 43, 39.5%, vs. 9 of 23, 39.1%). In right-sided tumors with hMLH1 promoter methylation, the frequency of MSI-positive tumors in group 1 was significantly lower than that in group 2 (1 of 17, 5.9%, vs. 4 of 9, 44.4%, p=0.0081). CONCLUSION: The frequency of MSI caused by hMLH1 promoter methylation increases with tumor progression in right-sided SCRCs.     

Frequent loss of hMLH1 by promoter hypermethylation leads to microsatellite instability in adenomatous polyps of patients with a single first-degree member affected by colon cancer

The first-degree relatives of patients affected by colorectal cancer, who do not belong to familial adenomatous polyposis and hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer families, have a doubled risk of developing tumors of the large intestine. We have previously demonstrated that subjects with a single first-degree relative (SFDR) with colon cancer have a doubled risk for developing colorectal adenomas, and in these cases, polyps recur more frequently. The mechanism underlying this predisposition has not been clarified. In this study, we evaluated the frequency of microsatellite instability (MSI) using the five markers suggested by the National Cancer Institute workshop, target gene mutations, hMLH1 and hMSH2 expression, and hMLH1 promoter hypermethylation in the adenomas of patients with and without a SFDR affected by colon cancer. Seventy polyps were obtained from 70 patients: 27 with a single FDR with colon cancer and 43 without such a history. Of the 70 polyps, 12 were MSI-H (17.1%), 20 were MSI-L (28.6%), and 30 were microsatellite stable (42.9%). Of the 27 patients with positive family history, 8 polyps (29.6%) were MSI-H compared with those with negative history in which 4 polyps (9.3%) were MSI-H (P < 0.02). Of the 12 MSI-H polyps, all of the polyps obtained from patients with positive family history had loss of hMLH1 immunostaining versus one with negative family history (P < 0.02). Of the MSI-H polyps, 2 had a somatic frameshift mutation of the MBD4 gene, 1 of MSH6, 1 of BAX, and 2 of transforming growth factor betaRII. Furthermore, 6 of 8 polyps from patients with positive family history with MSI-H and loss of MLH1 had hypermethylation of the MLH1promoter versus none of the MSI-H with negative family history (P < 0.02). All 6 polyps of the 27 from SFDR positive subjects, with hMLH1 promoter hypermethylation loss of hMLH1 and MSI, were located in the right colon (P < 0.02). Hypermethylation of the promoter of hMLH1, consequent loss of hMLH1 expression, and MSI are at the basis of approximately 25% of adenomatous polyps developed in subjects with a SFDR affected by colorectal cancer.     

hMLH1 and hMSH2 mutations in families with familial clustering of gastric cancer and hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer

The pattern of hMLHI and hMSH2 mutations was assessed to identify the genetic correlation between hereditary gastric and colorectal cancers. Four disease groups and their healthy family members were assembled according to the presentation of gastric cancer: FG, familial clustering of gastric cancer (n = 32); CG, family with one or more colorectal and gastric cancers in first-degree relatives (n = 22); HS, seven HNPCC families corresponding to the Amsterdam criteria (AMS+) and 12 suspected HNPCC families which did not satisfy one of the criteria (AMS-), but no gastric cancer among first- and second-degree relatives (n = 19); and SG, sporadic gastric cancer (n = 33). In the CG group, three were included in AMS + and six in AMS- criteria. Peripheral blood was obtained from them to detect hMLHI and hMLH2 mutations using PCR-SSCP analysis and direct sequencing. The incidence of mutations was 9.4% in the FG group, 54.5% in the CG group, 31.6% in the HS group, and none in the SG group. The incidence, type, and number of the mutation were not different between the CG and HS groups. Thirty-four different mutations included 19 in hMLH1 and 15 in hMSH2. Gastric cancer was the most common extracolonic malignancy in HNPCC and suspected HNPCC families (9/28, 32.1%). The hMLH1 or hMSH2 mutation occurred in seven of 10 families with AMS+, whereas it occurred in four of 18 with AMS- (70% vs. 22.2%, P = .013). Five mutations in the hMLH1 and six mutations in the hMSH2 were exclusively found in families with gastric cancer. All three mutations in the FG group were in hMLHI and there was no mutation in their healthy family members. This study demonstrates that some familial clustering type of gastric cancer appears to be associated with hMLHI mutations thereby indicating a difference from the hereditary gastric cancer studies previously reported. In addition, hMLHI and hMSH2 mutations may impact the gastric cancer carcinogenesis in HNPCC or suspected HNPCC.