葡萄球菌对高水平莫匹罗星及奎奴普丁/达福普汀的耐药性

目的 了解临床分离的葡萄球菌对高水平莫匹罗星和奎奴普丁/达福普汀两种药物的耐药.方法 2009～2011年临床分离的669株葡萄球菌用K-B法检测其对两种药物的耐药性.结果 669株葡萄球菌共检出22株高水平莫匹罗星耐药株(MuH),总耐药率为3.29%,其中金黄色葡萄球菌(SA)3株,耐药率1.89%,凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(CNS)19株,耐药率为3.73%;奎奴普丁/达福普汀耐药株52株,耐药率为7.77%,其中SA 7株,耐药率为4.40%,CNS45株,耐药率为7.77%.对两种药物的耐药率SA比CNS都稍低.结论 莫匹罗星和奎奴普丁/达福普汀对葡萄球菌具有强抗菌活性,都是治疗葡萄球菌感染的良好选择,且对SA的效果更优于CNS.     

Patterns of phenotypic resistance to the macrolide-lincosamide-ketolide-streptogramin group of antibiotics in staphylococci

Phenotypes of resistance to the macrolide-lincosamide-ketolide-streptogramin (MLKS) group of antibiotics have been determined in 540 clinical isolates of staphylococci (210 Staphylococcus aureus and 330 coagulase-negative species). Results of disc diffusion tests using erythromycin A, oleandomycin, rokitamycin, clindamycin, telithromycin, quinupristin and dalfopristin delineated four main groups corresponding to those defined classically using erythromycin and clindamycin only, but with sub-divisions. Resistance to erythromycin was more common in coagulase-negative strains (56%) than in S. aureus (16%); telithromycin, clindamycin, quinupristin-dalfopristin and rokitamycin were active against >97% of S. aureus strains and >88% of the coagulase-negative strains. The commonest resistance phenotype was 'inducible MLS(B)' (12% in S. aureus, 31% in coagulase-negative strains); this group could be divided in terms of the different inducing abilities of erythromycin and oleandomycin. 'Constitutive MLS(B)' and 'MS' phenotypes were more often found in coagulase-negative strains (11 and 13%, respectively) than in S. aureus (2 and 1%). Novel phenotypes were found during the isolation of constitutively resistant mutants from inducible strains, and of resistant mutants from 'MS' strains. This extended phenotyping scheme has revealed further complexities and evolutionary possibilities in patterns of resistance to this group of antibiotics.     

Influence of inducible cross-resistance to macrolides, lincosamides, and streptogramin B-type antibiotics in Enterococcus faecium on activity of quinupristin-dalfopristin in vitro and in rabbits with experimental endocarditis.

The influence of inducible cross-resistance to macrolides, lincosamides, and streptogramin B (MLS(B)) type antibiotics (inducible MLS(B) phenotype) on the activity of quinupristin-dalfopristin was investigated against Enterococcus faecium in vitro and in rabbits with experimental endocarditis. In vitro, quinupristin-dalfopristin displayed bacteriostatic and bactericidal activities against a MLS(B)-susceptible strain similar to those against two strains with the inducible MLS(B) phenotype. In addition, induction of the two MLS(B)-resistant strains with quinupristin (0.016 to 1 microg/ml) or quinupristin-dalfopristin (0.08 to 0.25 microg/ml) increased the MICs of quinupristin from 8 microg/ml to 32 to > 128 microg/ml, but did not modify the MIC of dalfopristin (2 microg/ml) or quinupristin-dalfopristin (0.5 microg/ml). In a rabbit endocarditis model, quinupristin-dalfopristin was as active as amoxicillin against the MLS(B)-susceptible E. faecium strain. In contrast, the activity of quinupristin-dalfopristin was significantly decreased in animals infected with either of the two inducible MLS(B)-resistant strains (P < 0.05), although no mutants resistant to quinupristin-dalfopristin were detected. Against the clinical strain with the inducible MLS(B) phenotype, quinupristin-dalfopristin was not effective and was less active than amoxicillin (P < 0.001); however, the activity of the combination of amoxicillin and dalfopristin-quinupristin was superior to that of amoxicillin (P < 0.01). The different impact of the inducible MLS(B) phenotype in E. faecium on the activity of quinupristin-dalfopristin in vitro and in experimental endocarditis may be related to the reduced diffusion of dalfopristin compared with that of quinupristin into cardiac vegetations that we previously reported. This result emphasizes the importance of the constant presence of dalfopristin at the site of infection to ensure synergism with quinupristin.     

Serious streptococcal infections produced by isolates resistant to streptogramins (quinupristin/dalfopristin): case reports from the SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance program

The emergence and sustained prevalence of Gram-positive organisms resistant to antimicrobials has been of interest for over a decade. Quinupristin/dalfopristin (formerly RP 59500 or Synercid) is a new injectable streptogramin combination that has been reported to have activity against Gram-positive organisms, even those with documented MLS(B) resistance. However, the two case reports presented here illustrate three well-documented Streptococcus spp. strains (S. mitis, S. pneumoniae) to be resistant to quinupristin/dalfopristin (MICs at 3, 8, and 12 microg/ml) following referral as routine isolates in the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program. The S. pneumoniae pleural fluid isolate was cross-resistant to erythromycin. Both bacteremic S. mitis strains were resistant to macrolides (erythromycin, azithromycin, clarithromycin), lincosamides (clindamycin), and fluoroquinolones. Patient histories indicated no prior use of MLS class antimicrobials for the S. mitis case, but the patient having the S. pneumoniae isolate did receive prior treatment of erythromycin and clindamycin. All isolates had modestly increased penicillin MICs of 0.12 microg/ml. The mode of resistance to quinupristin/dalfopristin was not evident (sat A-negative by PCR); and these cases illustrate the existence of streptogramin-resistant isolates before the introduction of this antimicrobial class into human clinical practice.     

Susceptibility to quinupristin/dalfopristin and other antibiotics of vancomycin-resistant enterococci from the UK, 1997 to mid-1999

Susceptibility to quinupristin/dalfopristin and other antibiotics was studied for clinical isolates of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) referred by UK hospitals between January 1997 and June 1999. Single isolates of VRE from 858 patients in 136 hospitals were received, of which 76% were Enterococcus faecium and 21% were Enterococcus faecalis, the remainder comprising minor species. Most isolates were multi-resistant. After allowing for the effect of blood, which raised the MICs of quinupristin/dalfopristin four-fold, 98.3% of E. faecalis isolates and all the Enterococcus avium, Enterococcus casseliflavus and Enterococcus gallinarum appeared resistant to quinupristin/dalfopristin, whereas 98.8% of the E. faecium isolates and the single Enterococcus raffinosus isolate were susceptible.     

Prevalence of macrolide-resistance genes in Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecium isolates from 24 European university hospitals

The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to study the prevalence of the macrolide resistance genes ermA, ermB, ermC, msrA/msrB, ereA and ereB, in 851 clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and 75 clinical isolates of Enterococcus faecium that were erythromycin resistant. The isolates were from 24 European university hospitals. In S. aureus, the ermA gene was more common in methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) isolates (88%) than in methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) isolates (38%), and occurred mainly in strains with constitutive MLS(B) expression. In contrast, ermC was more common in MSSA (47%) than in MRSA (5%), occurring mainly in strains with inducible expression. The ereB gene was only found in MRSA isolates expressing a constitutive MLS(B) phenotype (1%). The ereA gene was not detected. Macrolide resistance by efflux due to the msrA/msrB gene was only detected in MSSA isolates (13%). In contrast to S. aureus, erythromycin resistance in E. faecium was almost exclusively due to the presence of the ermB gene (93%).     

In vitro activity of quinupristin/dalfopristin against clinical isolates of common gram-positive bacteria in Taiwan

The MICs of quinupristin/dalfopristin against common Gram-positive bacteria isolated from various clinical specimens at a university hospital in Taiwan were determined by the agar dilution method. The tested bacteria included methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE), methicillin-susceptible S. epidermidis (MSSE), Streptococcus pyogenes, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Enterococcus faecalis. With the exception of E. faecalis all bacteria were susceptible to quinupristin/dalfopristin. The MIC50 and MIC90 were, respectively, 0.25 microgram/mL and 0.5 microgram/mL for both MRSA and MSSA; 0.25 microgram/mL and 0.5 microgram/mL for MRSE; 0.25 microgram/mL and 0.25 microgram/mL for MSSE; 0.125 microgram/mL and 0.125 microgram/mL for S. pyogenes; and < or = 0.03 microgram/mL and 0.25 microgram/mL for S. pneumoniae. Eighty-two percent of the tested E. faecalis isolates were intermediately resistant or resistant to quinupristin/dalfopristin, with an MIC50 of 2 micrograms/mL and an MIC90 of 4 micrograms/mL. Quinupristin/dalfopristin seems to be a promising antimicrobial agent against common Gram-positive bacteria other than E. faecalis in Taiwan.     

Activities of the combination of quinupristin-dalfopristin with rifampin in vitro and in experimental endocarditis due to Staphylococcus aureus strains with various phenotypes of resistance to macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin antibiotics

We evaluated the activities of quinupristin-dalfopristin (Q-D), alone or in combination with rifampin, against three strains of Staphylococcus aureus susceptible to rifampin (MIC, 0.06 microg/ml) and to Q-D (MICs, 0.5 to 1 microg/ml) but displaying various phenotypes of resistance to macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin antibiotics: S. aureus HM1054 was susceptible to quinupristin and dalfopristin (MICs of 8 and 4 microg/ml, respectively); for S. aureus RP13, the MIC of dalfopristin was high (MICs of quinupristin and dalfopristin for strain RP13, 8 and 32 microg/ml, respectively); and S. aureus HM1054R was obtained after conjugative transfer of macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B constitutive resistance to HM1054, and the MIC of quinupristin for this strain was high (MICs of quinupristin and dalfopristin, 64 and 4 microg/ml, respectively). In vitro time-kill curve studies showed an additive effect [corrected] between Q-D and rifampin, at a concentration of four times the MIC, against the three strains. Rabbits with aortic endocarditis were treated 4 days with Q-D, rifampin, or their combination. In vivo, the combination was highly bactericidal and synergistic against strains susceptible to quinupristin (HM1054 and RP13) and sterilized 94% of the animals. In contrast, the combination was neither synergistic nor bactericidal against the quinupristin-resistant strain (HM1054R) and did not prevent the emergence of mutants resistant to rifampin. We conclude that the in vivo synergistic and bactericidal activity of the combination of Q-D and rifampin against S. aureus is predicted by the absence of resistance to quinupristin but not by in vitro combination studies.     

In vitro activity of quinupristin/dalfopristin,linezolid, telithromycin and comparator antimicrobial agents against 13 species of coagulase-negative staphylococci

OBJECTIVES: To determine in vitro susceptibilities of a large series of speciated coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) against three new antibiotics, linezolid, quinupristin/dalfopristin and telithromycin. METHODS: Susceptibilities to three new antibiotics and oxacillin, vancomycin, clindamycin and erythromycin were determined by the agar dilution method, as described by the NCCLS. RESULTS: Resistance to linezolid was not observed in any isolates, although MIC90 values varied between species. Fifteen of 658 (2.3%) isolates were resistant to quinupristin/dalfopristin, but < 1% of the clinically most important isolates of Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus haemolyticus and Staphylococcus hominis demonstrated resistance to this agent. Susceptibility to clindamycin correlated with susceptibility to quinupristin/dalfopristin; however, resistance to clindamycin did not predict quinupristin/dalfopristin resistance. Telithromycin was the least active of the new agents tested, showing activity similar to that of clindamycin. Susceptibility and resistance to clindamycin were predictive of susceptibility and resistance to telithromycin. CONCLUSION: Clindamycin susceptibility can be used as a surrogate marker for susceptibility to quinupristin/dalfopristin and telithromycin. Quinupristin/dalfopristin and linezolid show good activity against both mecA-positive and -negative CNS.     

Subinhibitory quinupristin/dalfopristin attenuates virulence of Staphylococcus aureus

OBJECTIVES: The semi-synthetic streptogramin quinupristin/dalfopristin antibiotic exerts potent bactericidal activity against Staphylococcus aureus. We investigated whether, like other bactericidal antibiotics used at subinhibitory concentrations, quinupristin/dalfopristin enhances release of toxins by Gram-positive cocci. METHODS: The activity of quinupristin/dalfopristin on exotoxin release by S. aureus was investigated by 2D SDS-PAGE combined with MALDI-TOF/MS analysis and by western blotting. RESULTS: We show that quinupristin/dalfopristin at subinhibitory concentrations reduces the release of S. aureus factors that induce tumour necrosis factor secretion in macrophages. Furthermore, quinupristin/dalfopristin but not linezolid attenuated S. aureus-mediated killing of infected host cells. When added to S. aureus cultures at different stages of bacterial growth, quinupristin/dalfopristin reduced in a dose-dependent manner the release of specific virulence factors (e.g. autolysin, protein A, alpha- and beta-haemolysins, lipases). In contrast, other presumably non-toxic exoproteins remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study suggest that subinhibitory quinupristin/dalfopristin inhibits virulence factor release by S. aureus, which might be especially helpful for the treatment of S. aureus infections, where both bactericidal as well as anti-toxin activity may be advantageous.     

Characterization of isolates associated with emerging resistance to quinupristin/dalfopristin (Synercid) during a worldwide clinical program

Quinupristin/dalfopristin (Synercid) is an i.v. antibiotic active against serious Gram-positive infections. Its unique dual mode of action means that the potential for resistance development is expected to be low. To determine the incidence of in vitro emerging resistance in worldwide clinical studies, susceptibility to quinupristin/dalfopristin was measured for baseline pathogens and corresponding on- or post-study isolates from 880 evaluable patients. In comparative studies of community-acquired pneumonia, complicated skin and skin structure infections, and nosocomial pneumonia, the incidence of emerging resistance was low (1 of 453; 0.22%; 95% CI: 0. 01-1.4%). Resistance development occurred in only one pathogen (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus). In noncomparative studies, six instances (1.8% of 338 evaluable cases; 95% CI: 0.7 to 4.0%) of emerging resistance (all vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium) were confirmed, accompanied by therapeutic failure in four cases. Molecular typing did not confirm the identity of one pair of strains. Overall, the incidence of emerging resistance to quinupristin/dalfopristin was low.     

2007-2012年浙江萧山医院尿路感染患者的肠球菌分布及耐药性分析

目的 调查从尿路感染患者分离的肠球菌的菌种、临床分布及耐药性,为临床合理选用抗生素提供依据。方法 尿培养采用经典型浸片Uricult,ATB-Expression细菌分析系统进行鉴定和药敏试验;所有资料采用Whonet 5.6软件进行回顾性分析。结果 分离肠球菌238株,主要为粪肠球菌122株（51.3%）和屎肠球菌95株（39.9%）;菌株主要来源列前2位的是内科（38.2%）和泌尿外科（21.0%）;耐药率较高的是红霉素（86.5%）、利福平（75.7%）和四环素（66.4%）;较低的是呋喃妥因（19.7%）、万古霉素（9.6%）和利奈唑胺（0.0%）;粪肠球菌对利福平、红霉素、奎奴普丁/达福普汀和四环素的耐药率较高,均76.5%,万古霉素耐药率0.9%;屎肠球菌对氨苄西林等8种药物耐药率75.8%,万古霉素耐药率4.3%。粪肠球菌对所测试抗生素耐药率仅有四环素、奎奴普丁/达福普汀高于屎肠球菌,其余低于屎肠球菌;利福平、万古霉素和利奈唑胺耐药率在二者间差异无统计学意义。2007年与2012年相比,青霉素、氨苄西林等药物耐药率上升,而环丙沙星、四环素等下降。结论 肠球菌是引起尿路感染的重要病原菌,以粪肠球菌和屎肠球菌为主,不同种类肠球菌耐药率差别较大,加强细菌培养和定期分析其耐药性,有助于提高临床治愈率及合理用药水平。     

Intra-hospital dissemination of quinupristin/dalfopristin- and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium in a paediatric ward of a German hospital

OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate nosocomial transmission of Enterococcus faecium resistant to quinupristin/dalfopristin and vancomycin/teicoplanin among paediatric patients in a German hospital ward. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Multiply-resistant E. faecium were isolated from three female patients aged 9 months, 2 and 15 years during a 10 day time span. Antibiotic susceptibilities were determined by microbroth dilution. Clonal relatedness among the isolates was investigated via SmaI-macrorestriction analysis by PFGE, multilocus sequence typing (MLST), and plasmid profiling. Presence of virulence and resistance determinants was tested by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Selected resistance genes were localized by Southern hybridizations. RESULTS: A single E. faecium isolate per patient was investigated. All exhibited resistances to quinupristin/dalfopristin, vancomycin/teicoplanin, streptomycin (high-level), penicillin/ampicillin, erythromycin, oxytetracycline, chloramphenicol, rifampicin and fusidic acid. The isolates were susceptible to linezolid only and intermediately resistant to fluoroquinolones including moxifloxacin. PFGE revealed identical patterns for all three isolates. PCRs for virulence determinants hyaluronidase and enterococcal surface protein, esp, were negative, whereas PCR for the enterocin A gene was positive. MLST identified clonal type [8-5-1-1-1-1-1] belonging to a clonal subgroup C1 of hospital- and outbreak-related E. faecium. Southern hybridizations located several resistance genes (erm(B), vat(D), vanA) on a large plasmid, which was transferable in mating experiments with an E. faecium recipient. CONCLUSIONS: These data show routes of dissemination of resistance to multiple antibiotics including streptogramins and glycopeptides in E. faecium via vertical and/or horizontal gene transfer. The isolates spread in the absence of a direct selective pressure, as none of the patients had received earlier streptogramin or glycopeptide therapy.     

Quinupristin/dalfopristin: a therapeutic review

BACKGROUND: The proliferation of multidrug-resistant gram-positive bacteria, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREF), has created a pressing need for effective alternative antibiotics. Quinupristin/dalfopristin is a new combination streptogramin product with a selective spectrum of antibacterial activity, mainly against gram-positive aerobic bacteria. It has been assessed primarily in emergency-use protocols, in hospitalized patients with skin and skin-structure infections, and in patients with VREF bacteremia. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this review were to summarize important results of in vitro microbiologic studies; to provide information on relevant pharmacokinetic parameters, drug interactions, and Y-site compatibility; and to assess efficacy and safety data from clinical studies of quinupristin/dalfopristin. METHODS: Articles included in this review were identified by a MEDLINE search of the literature published between 1966 and September 2000 using the terms Synercid, quinupristin, and dalfopristin. Additional articles were retrieved from the reference lists of articles identified in the MEDLINE search. RESULTS: In vitro analysis of the spectrum of activity of quinupristin/dalfopristin has confirmed its relatively selective coverage of gram-positive aerobic bacteria. Both quinupristin and dalfopristin undergo hepatic metabolism and are extensively excreted in the feces. Combination quinupristin/dalfopristin inhibits the cytochrome P450 3A4 pathway, and caution is warranted with concomitant use of other medications eliminated via this pathway. In trials in patients with VREF infections, treatment success with quinupristin/dalfopristin varied depending on the site of infection, ranging from 51.9% in bacteremia of unknown origin to 88.9% in urinary tract infections. The results of comparative clinical trials suggest that quinupristin/dalfopristin has similar efficacy to that of commonly used antibiotics, including cefazolin, oxacillin, and vancomycin, in patients with skin and skin-structure infections or nosocomial pneumonia. The most frequently reported adverse effects with administration of quinupristin/dalfopristin were infusion-site inflammation, pain, and edema; other infusion-site reactions; and thrombophlebitis. Arthralgia, myalgia, nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, and rash occurred in 2.5% to 4.6% of patients and were the most frequently reported systemic adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes data from clinical trials indicate that quinupristin/dalfopristin has the potential to play an important role in the treatment of bacteremia, complicated skin and skin-structure infections, and nosocomial pneumonia caused by VREF. Issues of bacterial resistance to quinupristin/dalfopristin and other appropriate uses of this combination agent remain to be elucidated.     

In vitro activity of GAR-936 against vancomycin-resistant enterococci, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae

We report the activity of the new glycylcycline antimicrobial agent GAR-936 against 37 clinical isolates of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (including organisms carrying the vanA, vanB, vanC-1, and vanC-2/3 genes), 26 clinical isolates of methicillin-resistant S. aureus and 30 clinical isolates of high-level penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae. All isolates of vancomycin-resistant enterococci, methicillin-resistant S. aureus, and penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae were inhibited by < or = 1, < or = 2, or < or = 0.25 microg/ml of GAR-936, respectively. Time kill experiments using vancomycin-resistant enterococci did not demonstrate synergy or antagonism between 2 microg/ml of GAR-936 and 0.25 microg/ml of quinupristin/dalfopristin.     

Resistance to quinupristin-dalfopristin due to mutation of L22 ribosomal protein in Staphylococcus aureus

The mechanism of resistance to the streptogramin antibiotics quinupristin and dalfopristin was studied in a Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolate selected under quinupristin-dalfopristin therapy, in four derivatives of S. aureus RN4220 selected in vitro, and in a mutant selected in a model of rabbit aortic endocarditis. For all strains the MICs of erythromycin, quinupristin, and quinupristin-dalfopristin were higher than those for the parental strains but the MICs of dalfopristin and lincomycin were similar. Portions of genes for domains II and V of 23S rRNA and the genes for ribosomal proteins L4 and L22 were amplified and sequenced. All mutants contained insertions or deletions in a protruding beta hairpin that is part of the conserved C terminus of the L22 protein and that interacts with 23S rRNA. Susceptible S. aureus RN4220 was transformed with plasmid DNA encoding the L22 alteration, resulting in transformants that were erythromycin and quinupristin resistant. Synergistic ribosomal binding of streptogramins A and B, studied by analyzing the fluorescence kinetics of pristinamycin I(A)-ribosome complexes, was abolished in the mutant strain, providing an explanation for quinupristin-dalfopristin resistance.     

Effects of Genes Encoding Resistance to Streptogramins A and B on the Activity of Quinupristin-Dalfopristin against Enterococcus faecium

Quinupristin-dalfopristin is a streptogramin combination active against multiply resistant Enterococcus faecium. Among 45 E. faecium isolated from patients in various French hospitals, only two strains were intermediate (MIC = 2 microgram/ml) and one, E. faecium HM1032, was resistant (MIC = 16 microgram/ml) to quinupristin-dalfopristin, according to British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy and National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards approved breakpoints. The latter strain contained the vgb and satA genes responsible for hydrolysis or acetylation of quinupristin and dalfopristin, respectively, and an ermB gene (also previously referred to as ermAM) encoding a ribosomal methylase. The two intermediate strains had an LS(A) phenotype characterized by resistance to lincomycin (L), increased MICs (>/=8 microgram/ml) of dalfopristin (streptogramin A [S(A)]), and susceptibility to erythromycin and quinupristin. This phenotype was also detected in eight other strains susceptible to quinupristin-dalfopristin. No genes already known and conferring resistance to dalfopristin by acetylation or active efflux were detected in these LS(A) strains. Nineteen other strains resistant to erythromycin but susceptible to the quinupristin-dalfopristin combination displayed elevated MICs of quinupristin after induction (from 16 to >128 microgram/ml) and contained ermB genes. The effects of ermB, vgb, and satA genes on the activity of the streptogramin combination were tested by cloning these genes individually or in various combinations in recipient strains susceptible to quinupristin-dalfopristin, E. faecium HM1070 and Staphylococcus aureus RN4220. The presence of both the satA and vgb genes (regardless of the presence of an ermB gene) was necessary to confer full quinupristin-dalfopristin resistance to the host. The same genetic constructs were introduced into E. faecium BM4107 which displays a LS(A) phenotype. Addition of the satA or vgb gene to this LS(A) background conferred resistance to quinupristin-dalfopristin.     

Successful administration of quinupristin/dalfopristin in the outpatient setting

Intravenous administration of quinupristin/dalfopristin outside the hospital setting has not been reported previously. We describe 37 outpatients receiving quinupristin/dalfopristin iv for infections including osteomyelitis, bacteraemia, abscesses and cellulitis. The most frequent aetiological pathogens found were Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci. Patients received an average of 9 days therapy as inpatients and 22 days as outpatients. Quinupristin/dalfopristin was administered using various access devices, most commonly peripherally inserted central catheters and tunnelled central catheters. The bacteriological and clinical success rates were both 89.2%. Five patients were readmitted to hospital; one patient developed catheter-related bacteraemia. The most frequently reported non-venous adverse events were nausea (18.9% of patients), myalgia (18.9%) and arthralgia (13.5%). Sixteen patients experienced venous access-related events, most commonly infusion pain, oedema and phlebitis. In this group of patients, for those who had difficult-to-treat infections, intravenous quinupristin/dalfopristin therapy was generally effective and safe outside the hospital setting.     

Treatment of experimental endocarditis due to erythromycin-susceptible or -resistant methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with RP 59500.

RP 59500 is a new injectable streptogramin composed of two synergistic components (quinupristin and dalfopristin) which are active against erythromycin-susceptible and -resistant gram-positive pathogens. The present experiments compared the therapeutic efficacy of RP 59500 with that of vancomycin against experimental endocarditis due to either of two erythromycin-susceptible or two constitutively erythromycin-resistant isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. RP 59500 had low MICs for the four test organisms as well as for 24 additional isolates (the MIC at which 90% of the isolates were inhibited was < 1 mg/liter) which were mostly inducibly (47%) or constitutively (39%) erythromycin resistant. Aortic endocarditis in rats was produced with catheter-induced vegetations. Three-day therapy was initiated 12 h after infection, and the drugs were delivered via a computerized pump, which permitted the mimicking of the drug kinetics produced in human serum by twice-daily intravenous injections of 7 mg of RP 59500 per kg of body weight or 1 g of vancomycin. Both antibiotics reduced vegetation bacterial titers to below detection levels in ca. 70% of animals infected with the erythromycin-susceptible isolates (P < 0.05 compared with titers in controls). Vancomycin was also effective against the constitutively resistant strains, but RP 59500 failed against these isolates. Further experiments proved that RP 59500 failures were related to the very short life span of dalfopristin in serum (< or = 2 h, compared with > or = 6 h for quinupristin), since successful treatment was restored by artificially prolonging the dalfopristin levels for 6 h. Thus, RP 59500 is a promising alternative to vancomycin against methicillin-resistant S. aureus infections, provided that pharmacokinetic parameters are adjusted to afford prolonged levels of both of its constituents in serum. This observation is also relevant to humans, in whom the life span of dalfopristin in serum is also shorter than that of quinupristin.     

2006年中国七家教学医院革兰阳性球菌耐药性研究

目的 调查2006年我国革兰阳性球菌的耐药性.方法 收集2006年6-12月全国7家教学医院分离的非重复革兰阳件菌674株,以琼脂稀释法测定抗菌药物的MIC.结果 100株肺炎链球菌中,青霉素耐药的肺炎链球菌(PRSP)和青霉素中介的肺炎链球菌(PISP)分别占1%和19%.所有肺炎链球菌均对万古霉素和替考拉宁高度敏感;对左氧氟沙星和莫西沙星的敏感率分别为97%和98%;对阿莫西林/克拉维酸、头孢曲松和氯霉素的敏感率依次为96%、87%和73%;青霉素敏感的肺炎链球菌(PSSP)全部对头孢丙烯和头孢克罗的敏感率分别为62.0%和55.7%,而PISP和PRSP对这2种抗菌药物均耐药;所有肺炎链球菌埘大环内酯类、甲氧苄啶/磺胺甲恶(噁)唑(TMPCo)和四环素的敏感率均小于35%.金黄色葡萄球菌和凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(SCON)中耐甲氧西林菌株分别占48%(33%～84%)和81%(69%～94%).耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)对TMPCo、氯霉素和利福平敏感率分别为72%、66%和45%;对大环内脂类、氨基糖苷类、四环素和氟喹诺酮类的敏感率低于18%.粪肠球菌和屎肠球菌对高浓度庆大霉素耐药率分别为56%(30%～86%)和80%(50%～100%).未发现对万古霉素和替考拉宁耐药的葡萄球菌和粪肠球菌;但在杭州发现对该2种抗菌药物同时耐药的屎肠球菌.除氯霉素和四环素外,粪肠球菌对其他所测抗菌药物的敏感率均高于屎肠球菌.结论 各地区革兰阳件耐药性有所差异,且对大部分抗菌药物的耐药率较2005年本项目的 监测结果有所升高.替考拉宁和万古霉素对革兰阳性球菌仍保持很高的抗菌活性.