Conservative management of rectal cancer with local excision and adjuvant therapy

The standard surgical treatment of distal, resectable, invasive rectal cancers is an abdominoperineal resection or a low anterior resection. Given the morbidity associated with these standard treatments and the frequent need for postoperative adjuvant therapy, the use of a more conservative approach, such as local excision with adjuvant therapy as primary therapy for selected cases of rectal cancer is appealing. Data from single-institution series as well as recent data from prospective, multi-institutional studies, suggest that local excision with adjuvant therapy is a reasonable alternative to radical surgery in selected patients. Local excision alone is acceptable treatment only for T1 tumors without adverse pathologic features, while local excision with adjuvant therapy is an alternative treatment for T1 tumors with adverse pathologic features and T2 tumors. Some series suggest that preoperative therapy with local excision may be a possible treatment for selected T3 tumors; however, the high local failure rates seen in T3 tumors treated with local excision and postoperative therapy cautions against this approach. Functional results with local excision are generally good, and postoperative morbidity and mortality is acceptable. In summary, the results of local excision and radiation therapy are encouraging. Randomized trials are needed to determine whether this approach has local control and survival rates comparable to those of radical surgery.     

Salivary gland tumors of the oral cavity

Between 1961 and 1985, 62 patients with malignant salivary gland tumors of the oral cavity underwent surgery with curative intent at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Medical center. All patients had a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Fifty of 62 (81%) patients presented with T1-2 primary tumors. The tumors arose from the palate in 41/62 (66%) patients. The most common histologic type was adenoid cystic carcinoma comprising 34 of 62 (55%) cases. Radical resection was performed in 46 cases and wide local excision in 16 patients. Postoperative radiation therapy was used in 24 cases due to advanced stage and/or positive surgical margins. Results of treatment were analyzed by stage of disease, modes of treatment, histology, and surgical extent. Local control of small lesions reached 100% at 10 years with either radical resection alone or local excision. With residual tumor at the surgical margins, the incidence of local recurrence was 4/14 (29%) for those who received adjuvant radiation therapy and 5/10 (50%) for those who did not. The vast majority of mucoepidermoid carcinomas were early stage and low grade. These lesions had an excellent prognosis with a control rate of 100%. In contrast, there was a 29% (10/34) failure rate for adenoid cystic carcinoma. The 5-, 10-, and 15-year actuarial survivals for the whole group were 94%, 84%, and 73%, respectively. Our results indicate that for early stage disease, wide local excision may offer patients the chance to avoid the cosmetically and functionally debilitating effects of radical surgery without compromising treatment outcome. Adjuvant radiation therapy appears to reduce the local recurrence for those with residual tumor at the surgical margins.     

Local therapy for rectal cancer.

In selected patients with early rectal cancer, local therapy is an effective alternative to radical resection and offers minimal morbidity and the avoidance of a colostomy. Several techniques are described: transanal excision, dorsal approaches (York-Mason or Kraske procedures), transanal endoscopic microsurgery, endocavitary radiation, and transanal fulguration. Among these, transanal excision is favored for the low rate of complications, promising outcomes, and ability to secure tissue for pathology. Patients with T1 lesions with favorable histologic features may undergo local excision alone, while those with T2 lesions require adjuvant chemoradiation. The data currently available do not support the use of local therapy with curative intent for tumors that are advanced (T3 or T4), poorly differentiated, or have other negative pathologic characteristics. In carefully selected patients for local excision, local recurrence and survival rates are similar to traditional radical resection. Following local excision, patients require close observation for recurrence. Most patients with local recurrence can be salvaged by radical resection, though the long-term outcome is unknown.     

Rectal cancer radiotherapy

Adjuvant therapy for rectal cancer has undergone significant modifications over the past 30 years, including the addition of radiation therapy, significant improvements in surgical technique, and the administration of systemic therapy. Historically, curative resection commonly required an abdominoperineal resection and permanent colostomy. Adjuvant radiation therapy not only improved local control and overall survival, but allowed the opportunity for sphincter-preserving resections in patients with adequate sphincter function and tumors located approximately 1-2 cm from the dentate line. Local recurrence, a primary mode of failure in rectal cancer, has been improved by the development of the total mesorectal excision, with en-bloc resection of the rectum and its lymphovascular mesentery, the mesorectum. Removing micrometastatic disease within the mesorectum has also enhanced sphincter preservation without compromising local control or survival. Locoregional recurrence has remained a significant issue for patients with locally advanced disease (node positive or high T stage). Multiple studies have shown that the addition of chemotherapy further improves outcomes versus surgery alone or combined surgery and radiation, due both to the radiosensitizing properties of certain systemic agents as well as to the direct cytotoxic effect of the chemotherapy on micrometastatic disease. Adjuvant concurrent chemoirradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer confers a significant improvement in local control and overall survival compared with either modality alone. The future direction of treatment for rectal cancer will certainly consist of improved imaging and other diagnostic techniques to determine more accurately the need for adjuvant therapy. Multimodality therapy with radiotherapy administered in combination with systemic and biologic agents as radiation sensitizers is currently under investigation and may allow for improved local control and perhaps allow for minimizing the extent of surgery in selected situations.     

A current perspective on local excision of rectal cancer

Local excision of rectal cancer is appealing because of its technical ease and excellent functional results, but concern over inadequate pathologic staging and inferior treatment outcomes when compared with radical surgery remain a major hurdle for its widespread use. Local failure rates in modern series for local excision are 4%-18% for T1 rectal cancers and 22%-67% for T2 cancers, and cancer cure rates are only 70%-80%. In addition, data from the past decade suggest that preoperative staging with endorectal ultrasound, use of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy/radiation therapy, and aggressive salvage surgery have not been reliable methods of limiting local tumor recurrence or improving long-term cure rates. At present, highly stringent criteria for patient selection are recommended, yet such stringency decreases the utility of the procedure. What are needed are new approaches to an old problem. Novel strategies under evaluation include enhanced imaging modalities for lymph node metastases, neoadjuvant chemotherapy/radiation therapy, and more liberal use of immediate salvage resection for high-risk pathologic features. Molecular profiling of tumors with genetic markers and better integration of traditional and gene-targeted systemic therapy are promising approaches for the future. This review of the literature evaluates the recent successes and failures of local excision of rectal cancer and provides a current perspective on the expanded use of local excision without compromising care.     

Desmoid tumor: prognostic factors and outcome after surgery, radiation therapy, or combined surgery and radiation therapy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the therapeutic value of resection and the potential benefits of and indications for adjuvant and definitive radiation therapy for desmoid tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 189 consecutive cases of desmoid tumor treated with surgical resection, resection and radiation therapy, or radiation therapy alone. Treatment was surgery alone in 122 cases, surgery and radiation therapy in 46, and radiation therapy alone in 21. Median follow-up was 9.4 years. RESULTS: Overall, 5- and 10-year actuarial relapse rates were 30% and 33%, respectively. Uncorrected survival rates were 96%, 92%, and 87% at 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively. For the patients treated with surgery, the actuarial relapse rates were 34% and 38% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Among 78 patients with negative margins, the 10-year recurrence rate was 27%, whereas 40 margin-positive patients had a 10-year relapse rate of 54% (P = .003). Tumors located in an extremity also had a poorer prognosis than did those in the trunk. For patients treated with radiation therapy for gross disease, the 10-year actuarial relapse rate was 24%. For patients treated with combined resection and radiation therapy, the 10-year actuarial relapse rate was 25%. The addition of radiation therapy offset the adverse impact of positive margins seen in the surgical group. CONCLUSION: Wide local excision with negative pathologic margins is the treatment of choice for most desmoid tumors. Function-sparing resection is appropriate because adjuvant radiation therapy can offset the adverse impact of positive margins. Unresectable disease should be treated with definitive radiation therapy.     

Long-term results of local excision with and without chemoradiation for adenocarcinoma of the rectum

The role of local excision for rectal carcinoma remains controversial. We reviewed 285 patients undergoing curative resection for rectal cancer between 1984 and 2001. Surgical procedures were local excision (LE; n = 49), abdominoperineal resection (APR; n = 124), and low anterior resection (LAR; n = 112). Median follow-up for all patients was 6.2 years. For patients undergoing local excision, postoperative tumor stages were Tis (22%), T1 (41%), T2 (18%), and T3 (18%). Twelve patients received postoperative radiation >/= 45 Gy, and 4 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. Of the 49 patients who underwent LE, the 5- and 10-year overall survival rates were 76% and 42%, respectively. The 5- and 10-year disease-free survival rates were 69% and 58%, respectively. The incidence of local recurrence was 16% and the incidence of distant recurrence was 6%. For the 11 patients who experienced disease recurrence, the median time to recurrence was 13 months (range, 1-59 months). Of the 8 patients who developed local recurrence, 4 refused salvage treatment, 2 underwent salvage APR, and 2 underwent repeat excision. Of the 4 who underwent salvage surgery, one is alive with no evidence of disease, one developed distant disease, and 2 died with unknown disease status. Adjuvant therapy did not affect survival or recurrence rates in patients undergoing LE compared with other surgeries. The rate of local failure (16%) is comparable to that observed in the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 8984 prospective study and suggests that highly selected patients undergoing local excision can expect good local control of rectal cancer.     

Treatment and local control of primary extremity soft tissue sarcomas.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Modern series of adult extremity soft tissue sarcomas utilize combinations of modalities in all patients. Remaining questions: 1) is it necessary to strive for wide margins in the multimodality era; 2) to use adjuvant therapy in every high-grade sarcoma? 3) Does previous partial or marginal resection seriously interfere with the definitive resection? METHODS: In a retrospective review of 194 extremity soft tissue sarcomas (1977-1994), limb preservation was possible in 181/194 (93%) of cases. Patients with narrow margins received adjuvant radiation. Some patients were referred after partial (n = 39) or "complete" (n = 63) excision. RESULTS: Local recurrence was observed in 181/141 (13%) of patients treated with wide or compartmental resection, and in 10 of 42 (24%) of those treated with conservative resection plus radiation (P = 0.14). The 5-year survival rate for grade III, >/=5-cm sarcomas was not significantly different (P = 0.82) with adjuvant (46%) or without (48%) adjuvant systemic chemotherapy. Five-year survival varied (P = 0.0001) according to grade. Patients referred with partial, or "complete" (63%, 38/63, had residual tumor at reoperation) excision had a local recurrence rate of 8% and 6%, and 5-year survival rates of 75% and 84%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: 1) It is important to strive for wide margins even when adjuvant radiation is intended. 2) When a wide margin is possible, adjuvant radiation may not be necessary. 3) Adjuvant systemic chemotherapy may be considered for high-grade tumors, preferably within a prospective protocol. 4) A partial or "complete" excision of the tumor before referral to a tertiary center does not appear to compromise the limb preservation, local control, or survival rates of these patients.     

Adjuvant radiotherapy in high stage transitional cell carcinoma of the renal pelvis and ureter.

This review was undertaken to assess the influence of adjuvant radiation therapy on failure patterns and survival in high stage transitional cell carcinoma of the renal pelvis or ureter. Ninety-four patients with transitional cell carcinoma of the renal pelvis or ureter were retrospectively reviewed. Twenty-six had American Joint Commission stage T3 or T4 N0/+, M0 disease and underwent curative resections (median follow-up 13.5 months, range 3-311). Local failure was defined as recurrence in the tumor bed, regional nodes, or ureteral stump. Time to recurrence and survival were calculated from the time of pathologic diagnosis. Variables associated with local failure, distant metastasis, and survival were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analysis. Seventeen received surgery only, nine received adjuvant radiation therapy (median dose 50 Gy). Local failure occurred in 9 of 17 without and 1 of 9 with adjuvant radiation therapy (p = 0.07). Actuarial 5-year local control was 34% without and 88% with adjuvant radiation therapy. Cox step-wise regression confirmed adjuvant radiation therapy (p = 0.006) and grade (p = 0.006) as significantly associated with local failure. No patients with low grade lesions suffered local failure either with or without adjuvant radiation therapy. High grade lesions had an local failure rate of 15% with and 71% without adjuvant radiation therapy. Metastatic disease occurred in 4 of 9 and 8 of 17 with and without radiation therapy. No significant factors influencing distant failure were identified. Five-year actuarial survival was 44% with and 24% without adjuvant radiation therapy. The survival differences were not statistically significant on univariate or multivariate analysis. High staged transitional cell carcinoma of the renal pelvis or ureter has a substantial local failure risk after surgery alone. Adjuvant radiation therapy markedly reduces this risk but has no impact on distant disease which occurs in approximately 50%. Effective adjuvant therapy will require effective systemic therapy in addition to adjuvant radiation therapy.     

Role of Combined-Modality Therapy in the Management of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

The majority of patients with nonmetastatic rectal cancer are candidates for an aggressive multimodality approach with curative intent. Preoperative staging is critical in determining which patients should be offered neoadjuvant therapy. Available staging tools include digital rectal examination, transrectal ultrasound, computed tomography, positron-emission tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging scans. Magnetic resonance imaging has emerged as the most accurate staging modality in experienced centers. Multidisciplinary preoperative patient evaluation, better staging techniques, neoadjuvant chemoradiation, acceptance of shorter distal rectal margins, and transanal excision of T1 N0 rectal tumors in close proximity to the anal sphincter have resulted in decreased rates of abdominoperineal resections. Total mesorectal excision has been adopted as the standard surgical approach because of a reduction in rates of pelvic relapse. Preoperative and postoperative radiation therapy was shown to decrease the local recurrence rate, but not overall survival, in patients with resectable rectal cancer. The addition of chemotherapy to radiation was consistently shown to improve local control, and in some trials, improved overall survival. Neoadjuvant combined chemotherapy and radiation therapy are superior to adjuvant combined-modality therapy because of higher rates of sphincter preservation, less toxicity, and lower local recurrence rates. For patients with stage II or III disease, neoadjuvant continuous-infusion 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), concurrently with pelvic radiation, followed by postoperative 5-FU–based chemotherapy, remains the standard multimodality approach. Ongoing trials are testing the integration of newer cytotoxic agents such as capecitabine, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and biologic agents such as cetuximab and bevacizumab to chemoradiation.     

Ependymal tumors

Opinion statement Ependymal tumors are rare malignancies that arise from the cells that line the ventricles and central canal of the spinal cord. Although they are more common in children, adults may also be effected by ependymal tumors. Prognosis is dependent on tumor location, histology, especially for myxopapillary tumors that tend to occur in the lumbar spine, extent of surgical resection, and stage of disease. Standard therapy consists of complete resection when feasible. The exact role of adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with radiographically confirmed complete resection is poorly defined. Patients with known residual disease may benefit from local radiation therapy, but the extent of radiation field and total dose are controversial. Even in patients treated with involved field radiotherapy, most relapses occur within the original tumor bed, thus local control remains the biggest obstacle to effective therapy. Chemotherapy has little impact against this tumor and has no role in the adjuvant setting, outside of a well designed clinical trial, with the possible exception of children younger than 5 years in an effort to delay radiation. A minority of patients may respond to one of several chemotherapy regimens at the time of recurrence, but the impact of this therapy is limited. Newer treatment strategies are needed.     

Optimizing local control in anorectal melanoma

Background: Wide local excision (WLE) of anorectal melanoma is associated with a high incidence of local recurrence. There is a paucity of literature on adjuvant radiation in this malignancy. Aim: To identify the optimal method of local treatment in anorectal melanoma. Settings and Design: Retrospective study in a tertiary cancer centre. Materials and Methods: Records of 63 patients who presented between 1980 and 2004 were reviewed. Results: Of the 63 patients, 18 were treated by either surgery with or without adjuvant radiation, or by radiation alone. The remaining had advanced disease and were offered only symptomatic treatment. The median overall survival in stage I patients was 12 months, while it was seven and four months in those with stage II and III disease respectively. The median survival in patients treated by WLE with adjuvant radiation (RT), WLE alone or Abdominoperineal resection (APR) was 34, 12 and 10 months respectively. Patients in whom the disease was confined to the mucosa had a better median overall survival than those in whom it had infiltrated beyond the mucosa (102 vs 11 months). The pattern of recurrence following WLE with adjuvant RT or APR was similar. None of the patients who received adjuvant RT after wide excision had a local or nodal recurrence. Conclusion: Local treatment of anorectal melanoma should be individualized. WLE with adjuvant radiation seems to offer good locoregional control without reducing the survival and may be an option of treatment for patients with small, superficial anorectal melanoma. However, APR should be offered for patients with locally advanced disease or as a salvage following recurrence.     

Wide excision without radiation for desmoplastic melanoma

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant radiation has been proposed for the treatment of patients with desmoplastic melanoma, who reportedly have local recurrence rates as high as 40-60%. The authors investigated local recurrence rates at a tertiary referral center to determine the success of wide excision alone for patients with desmoplastic melanoma. METHODS: A review of a prospectively maintained melanoma clinical data base identified 65 patients between March 1997 and March 2004 with pure cutaneous desmoplastic melanoma. Complete surgical, histopathologic, and staging information was collected along with data on outcome, including local, regional, and distant recurrence and survival. RESULTS: Similar to previous reports, patients with desmoplastic melanoma had a male-to-female ratio of 2 to 1, a mean age of 65.0 years (range, 31-92 yrs), and the majority of their tumors (55%) were located on the head and neck. The mean Breslow depth at diagnosis was 4.21 mm, with 38% of tumors thicker than 4.0 mm. All patients in this series underwent wide excision without radiation therapy. Surgical margins < or = 2 cm were obtained for all trunk and extremity lesions and for 63% of head and neck lesions that measured > 1 mm in depth (63%). Margins of 1-2 cm were obtained for the remaining patients. Among 49 patients who had a minimum of 2 years of follow-up (mean, 3.7 yrs), the local recurrence rate was 4% (2 of 49 patients). Seventy-eight percent of the patients studied remained alive with no evidence of disease. CONCLUSIONS: Local recurrence rates in the current series were considerably lower than the historically reported rates. This finding suggests that, for patients with desmoplastic melanoma, wide local excision with careful attention to appropriate margins produces excellent local control rates without the need for adjuvant radiation.     

Management of Early (T1 or T2) Rectal Cancer

Early stage rectal cancers (T1/T2) are being found more commonly due to increasing compliance with population screening guidelines. Patient selection is the most important element in advising local excision versus standard transabdominal resection with total mesorectal excision (TME). Determining the best strategy for an individual patient relies on accurate histologic assessment (a surrogate of biologic behavior), accurate clinical staging (endorectal ultrasound or MRI), and accurate assessment of patient procedural risk. It is important to review the histology for high-risk features associated with occult lymph node metastasis as this portends a higher local recurrence rate. Since the local recurrence rate following local excision for T2 rectal cancer is high, it has been our practice to offer these patients proctectomy with TME unless the patient has a poor performance status, is unwilling to proceed, or is part of a clinical trial. We limit transanal resection to well-selected patients with T1 lesions without high-risk histologic features (lymphovascular invasion, poor grade, or deep submucosal invasion). Factors such as patient procedural preference and comorbidities may influence this decision but it is on a case by case basis. Local excision can be accomplished with conventional transanal procedures; however, newer techniques such as transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) and transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) may have less specimen fragmentation and improved R0 resection rates. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation may add further benefit for maximizing local control but is associated with local wound problems including bleeding and infection. Adherence to a strict surveillance program after local excision allows clinicians to salvage recurrence as early as possible. In a multidisciplinary fashion, the surgeon, pathologist, gastroenterologist, and patient need to make informed decisions about risk and benefit when determining the best individualized care for the patient.     

Current Options for the Management of Rectal Cancer

Opinion statement Patients diagnosed with rectal cancer should undergo locoregional staging with transrectal endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) or surface coil array MRI of the pelvis if that technique is available. Patients thought to have more than very early stage (T1 or T2) disease should undergo abdominal imaging as well by CT or MRI, and chest imaging with either CXR or preferably CT. The care of rectal cancer patients should be coordinated amongst an experienced multidisciplinary team to maximize the chance of cure and to minimize both local recurrence and complications of therapy. For patients with very early stage disease (T1N0 or T2N0), local resection with or without chemoradiation may be adequate therapy, but these patients must be selected carefully and should be without any poor prognostic factors. For the majority of patients with T3N0 or greater rectal cancer, standard therapy consists of neoadjuvant continuous 5-FU and radiation followed by surgery and further chemotherapy (either with 5-FU, capecitabine, or FOLFOX). The use of capecitabine, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin during radiotherapy shows promise, but remains investigational pending results of phase III studies. Neoadjuvant therapy is preferred because it decreases local recurrence and appears to result in improved postoperative bowel function in comparison with postoperative therapy. Select patients with high (>10 cm from the anal verge) uT3N0 tumors may be at sufficiently low risk of local recurrence to justify omission of radiotherapy. Patients who experience pathologic complete response to radiotherapy should still receive postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy to reduce systemic recurrence risk until data demonstrate that this is not necessary. Patients with stage IV rectal cancer may still require local therapy with radiation, surgery, or both; however, care should be taken in these patients that chemotherapy is not excessively delayed as this is the one modality in this case that can result in improved survival.     

Transanale endoskopische Mikrochirurgie (TEM)

Local excision of rectal tumors was primarily carried out for adenomas or with a palliative intention. Over a course of more than 20 years local surgery has increasingly become established for early (T1) carcinomas. Among several local resection procedures, the less traumatizing transanal approach has become most accepted as compared to more aggressive techniques. The transanal endoscopic microsurgical (TEM) technique is most widely used. For ‘low risk’T1 carcinomas low local recurrence rates are primarily reported, and both the tumor characteristics and the quality of the resection are relevant prognostic factors. For ‘high risk’T1 or T2 carcinomas, high recurrence rates have to be expected. Among additional measures, immediate conventional radical re-operating is superior to adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. In addition, awaiting salvage surgery of local recurrences provides inferior oncological outcomes. Interestingly, favorable results have been obtained with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy of T2–3 rectal cancers and first studies consistently showed low recurrence rates.     

Surgical management of spinal mesenchymal tumors

Primary and metastatic spinal mesenchymal tumors are uncommon lesions. Surgical management of these tumors remains a challenge. En bloc wide resection provides the best chance for local tumor control and long-term survival. However, limitations to this technique include technical considerations (including neurovascular anatomy), patient selection, and tumor histology. Intralesional resection provides good neurologic outcomes, but local recurrence rates are high. Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with or without radiation may help to delay recurrence and improve outcomes. We present three cases of our surgical experience with spinal mesenchymal tumors for illustrative purposes.     

Clinical factors in prediction of prognosis after anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for carcinoma of the rectum

The aim of the study was to estimate the long-term results and the prognostic value of clinical and pathological factors following R0 anterior resection with total mesorectal excision (TME). Ninety-eight consecutive patients with histologically confirmed rectal cancer were studied prospectively with five-year follow-up. Survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and differences between curves were tested by the log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox regression model. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 63.6%. Mean time of recurrence was 13.8 months (range 3-38). Local recurrence rate was 7.8% with the mean time of 12.7 months (range 3-25). In univariate analysis Dukes' stage (RFS for stage: A=93.2%; B=53.8%; C=26.3%) and preoperative CEA serum level (s-CEA) (for s-CEA5 ng/ml RFS=5.9%) significantly influenced survival (P<0.005 and P<0.00001). These parameters were also found to be independent prognostic factors in multivariate analysis (P<0.05 and P<0.00001). Survival was worse in older female patients with low-localised poorly differentiated tumors; however, those variables had not significant impact on prognosis. Neither symptom duration nor mucinous histology was significantly related to survival. Using TME technique a low local recurrence rate resulting in improved survival can be achieved. Apart from clinicopathological staging, elevated s-CEA can identify patients with poor prognosis. In addition to TME adjuvant therapy for this high-risk group should be considered.     

Surgical therapy of early rectal carcinoma

Radical surgical resection is the "gold standard" treatment for rectal carcinoma. Results indicating that radiation therapy reduces the incidence of local recurrence and that combined modality radiation therapy and chemotherapy reduce the rate of local and distant failures, as well as improving survival, has produced interest in adjuvant therapy. Conservative procedures to treat rectal cancer are also gaining support because of reduced morbidity and mortality, avoidance of colostomy, and excellent survival figures in selected patients. The key phrase continues to be "in selected patients" because current data support conservative procedures as attempts for cure only in patients with small, histologically favorable tumors. The combination of local excision and adjuvant external beam irradiation holds promise for improved control of local disease in patients with early rectal carcinoma. Further prospective evaluation with long-term follow-up of patients with early rectal carcinoma treated with conservative procedures is needed to assess the efficacy of conservative management.     

Recurrence Risk and Prognostic Parameters in Stage I Rectal Cancers

Background: The standard therapy for stage I rectum cancer is surgical resection. Currently, there is no strong evidence to suggest that any type of adjuvant therapy is beneficial. The risks of local relapse and distant metastasis are higher in rectal tumors. Therefore, while there is no clearly defined absolute indication for adjuvant therapy in lymph node negative colon cancers, rectum tumors that are T3N0 and higher require adjuvant treatment. Due to the more aggressive nature of rectal cancers, we explored the clinical and pathologic factors that could predict the risk of relapse in Stage I (T1-T2) disease and whether there was any progression-free survival benefit to adjuvant therapy. Materials and Methods: This multicenter study was carried out by the Anatolian Society of Medical Oncology. A total of 178 patients with rectal cancers who underwent curative surgery between January 1994 and August 2012 in 13 centers were included in the study. Patient demographics, including survival data and tumor characteristics were obtained from medical charts. Results: The median age was 58 years (range26-85 years). Most tumors were well or moderately differentiated. For adjuvant treatment, 13 patients (7.3%) received radiotherapy alone, 12 patients (6.7%) received chemotherapy alone and 15 patients (8.4%) were given chemoradiotherapy. Median follow up was 29 months (3-225 months). Some 42 patients (23.6%) had relapse during follow up; 30 with local recurrence (71.4%) whereas 12 (28.6%) were distant metastases. Among the patients, 5-year DFS was 64% and OS was 82%. Mucinous histology and receiving adjuvant therapy were found to have statistically insignificant correlations with relapse and survival. Conclusions: In our retrospective analysis, approximately one quarter of patients exhibited either local or systemic relapse. The rates of relapse were slightly higher in the patients who had no adjuvant therapy. There may thus be a role for adjuvant therapy in high-risk stage I rectal tumors.