Positive pregnancy outcomes in Mexican immigrants: what can we learn?

OBJECTIVE: To provide an integrated review of the literature of potential explanations for better than expected pregnancy outcomes in Mexican immigrants, focusing on socioeconomics, social support, desirability of pregnancy, nutrition, substance use, religion, acculturation, and prenatal care. DATA SOURCES: Computerized searches of MEDLINE and CINAHL databases, as well as reference lists from published articles on low birth weight and prematurity in immigrants and acculturation in immigrants from January 1989 to December 2002. Search terms were Mexican immigrant women, childbearing, and pregnancy outcome, and only English-language articles were reviewed. STUDY SELECTION: Literature was selected from refereed publications in the areas of nursing, medicine, public health, family, and sociology. DATA EXTRACTION: Data were extracted using keywords pertinent to pregnancy outcome in Mexican immigrants. DATA SYNTHESIS: Despite having many of the risk factors for poor pregnancy outcomes, Mexican immigrants have superior birth outcomes when compared to U.S.-born women. Social support, familism, healthy diet, limited use of cigarettes and alcohol, and religion may play a role in improved outcomes. The superior outcomes diminish with the process of acculturation as the individual adapts to her new culture. CONCLUSIONS: Low birth weight and prematurity are public health concerns in the United States. Through further study of the factors that lead to superior birth outcomes among Mexican immigrant women, rates of low birth weight and prematurity in the United States may be reduced.     

Spontaneous late preterm births: what can be done to improve outcomes?

Despite the increase in indicated late preterm births, spontaneous preterm labor and preterm premature rupture of the fetal membranes are the most common antecedent diagnoses leading to births between 34-0/7 and 36-6/7 weeks of gestation. Regional and institutional variation in the rates of late spontaneous preterm birth suggests that there may be opportunities to reduce the number of these births. This article summarizes the factors contributing to late spontaneous preterm birth and offers suggestions to improve care for these mothers and infants.     

Long-term outcomes: what should the focus be?

The neonatal intervention trials of the 1980s and early 1990s focused primarily on short-term outcomes. Contemporary clinical trials have recognized the importance of longer-term outcomes but have rarely been powered to achieve that aim. This review discusses important and clinically relevant outcomes that future trials should be powered to address and identifies the challenges facing the neonatal clinical trials community. These challenges include consensus definitions of relevant outcomes that are objective and validated, variability among centers in populations and practices, and the need for predictive surrogate markers of long-term outcomes. Future trials must be designed and powered to address the potential for harm as well as the prospect of benefit.     

Social media in the REI clinic: what do patients want?

Purpose

To elicit patient preferences for social media utilization and content in the infertility clinic.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional survey study conducted in three US fertility practices. Women presenting to the infertility clinic for an initial or return visit were offered an anonymous voluntary social media survey. The survey elicited patient perception of whether social media use in the infertility clinic is beneficial, and preferences regarding topics of interest.

Results

A total of 244 surveys were collected during the study period, of which 54.5% were complete. Instagram is a more popular platform than Twitter across all age groups. Use of both platforms varies by age, with patients ≥?40 less likely to be active users. The majority of respondents felt that social media provided benefit to the patient experience in the infertility clinic (79.9%). “Education regarding infertility testing and treatment” and “Myths and Facts about infertility” were the most popular topics for potential posts, with 93.4 and 92.0% of patients endorsing interest respectively. The least popular topic was “Newborn photos and birth announcements,” with only 47.4% endorsing interest. A little over half of respondents (56.3%) would feel comfortable with the clinic posting a picture of their infant. The vast majority of patients (96.2%) feel comfortable communicating electronically with their infertility clinic.

Conclusion

Patients are interested in the use of social media as a forum for patient education and support in the infertility clinic. Patient preferences regarding post topics should be carefully considered.

     

Decreased fetal movements in the third trimester: what to do?

OBJECTIVE: To appreciate at the end of pregnancy, in a low-risk pregnant population, the interest of a screening for fetal well-being in case of decreased fetal movements. To define the most adapted screening. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective study over a complete year of the patients having consulted in the same center for decreased fetal movements and subjected to the same screening for fetal activity in hospitalization during 48 hours. This screening included a study of fetal heart rate repeated three times a day, a fetal biophysical profile scoring, an umbilical artery Doppler, a Kleihauer-Betke testing, and an amnioscopy. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty patients were identified, representing 6.1% of pregnancies followed in the center. There was no relation between the age, the parity of the patients and the probability to consult for a decrease of fetal movements. Nevertheless the antecedents of pathological pregnancy or fetal malformation were frequent. Twenty-one percent of the deliveries were induced for a global rate of 18% in the center. Twenty-eight percent of the patients had a cesarean section for a global rate of 22.8%. Five percent of fetuses were at risk for prenatal asphyxia on the data of the screening. Fetal heart rate was abnormal in 3.75% of cases, fetal biophysical profile score pathological in 3.1% of cases. Just one umbilical Doppler was highly pathological. No meconium amniotic fluid was found. Two Kleihauer-Betke tests were disturbing. At the time of delivery, 28% of fetuses presented a funicular abnormality, 4.3% a severe growth restriction, 4.3% a malformation. One child only had an anemia. There was no perinatal mortality. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Screening for fetal vitality remains necessary in case of decreased fetal movements. It has to associate the study of fetal heart rate and the fetal biophysical profile with a Kleihauer-Betke testing. In a low-risk pregnant population, the study of fetal Doppler velocimetry is not profitable. Amnioscopy presents not enough interest. It is necessary to insist with the patients on the necessity of consulting in case of decreased fetal movements even in the approach of the term.     

Listening to patients with unexplained menstrual symptoms: what do they tell the gynaecologist?

Objectives To describe how women present unexplained menstrual symptoms to gynaecologists; to find out whether presentation reflects how intense their symptoms feel or how much benefit they expect from gynaecological treatment; and to test the prediction that surgical treatment decisions are more likely to follow specific types of presentation.
Design A cross sectional cohort study.
Setting Gynaecological outpatient clinics in a teaching hospital.
Sample Fifty-nine patients, referred for menstrual problems, in whom investigations had excluded physical disease.
Methods Patients indicated symptom intensity and expectations of treatment before consultation on self-completed questionnaires. Audiotape recordings of consultations with the gynaecologist were transcribed and patients' use of specific communication strategies was coded according to a previously reported scheme.
Main outcome measures Treatment decision was noted.
Results In a third to a half of patients, presentation extended beyond symptom report to include catastrophisation about consequences of symptoms, reference to other individuals to substantiate the patient's problems, criticism of previous or possible future interventions or request for hysterectomy. Those with greatest expectations of gynaecological treatment were more likely to catastrophise and request hysterectomy. Those with most intense subjective symptoms were more likely to catastrophise, refer to other individuals and request hysterectomy, and these strategies were more likely to be followed by surgical treatment decisions.
Conclusions Surgical treatment for unexplained menstrual problems is not driven by gynaecologists. Reduction in unnecessary hysterectomies will require training in communication skills that reflects the challenging nature of many patients' presentation in the gynaecology clinic.     

Medico-legal issues in obstetric anesthesia: what does an obstetrician need to know?

Background  Obstetric anesthesia has become a recognized subspecialty of anesthesiology and an integral part of practice of most anesthesiologists. Perhaps no other subspecialty of anesthesiology provides more personal gratification and clinical challenges than the practice of obstetric anesthesia. However, in addition to clinical challenges obstetric anesthesia is laden with medico-legal liability. Objective  This review article attempts to highlight the influence of the current medico-legal climate on the practice of obstetric anesthesia. Methods  All articles relevant to the subject of this investigation were retrieved from a Medline search. Results  Obstetric anesthesiologists are frequently named (besides obstetricians) in claims involving bad neonatal outcomes. Obstetric anesthesia is also the most common subspecialty of practice to be ceased due to medico-legal concerns. Conclusions  Good perioperative evaluation of all patients, detailed review of patient’s medical records, and constant vigilance can decrease the incidence of complications and subsequently medico-legal issues.

Emotional stress and reproduction: what do fertility patients believe?

Purpose

To better understand the beliefs about a causal role of emotional stress maintained by women seeking fertility care.

Methods

A cross-sectional, self-administered survey was distributed to fertility care patients at an academic fertility center in Illinois. Of 5000 consecutive patients, 1460 completed the survey and were included in the study sample.

Results

Members of our sample (N = 1460) were between 20 and 58 years (mean = 36.2, SD = 4.4). Most respondents were White (72.2%), were in a heterosexual relationship (86.8%), and felt that their physician understood their cultural background (79.4%). Of the sample, 28.9% believed emotional stress could cause infertility, 69.0% believed emotional stress could reduce success with fertility treatment, and 31.3% believed that emotional stress could cause a miscarriage, with evidence of significant racial differences. Less than a quarter (23.8%) of the sample believed emotional stress had no impact on fertility. Lower household income and educational attainment were associated with a greater belief in emotional stress as a causative factor in reproduction with regard to infertility, fertility treatment, and miscarriage.

Conclusion

The majority of women seeking fertility care believe emotional stress could reduce the success of fertility treatment. Furthermore, beliefs about emotional stress and reproduction significantly differ based on race/ethnicity, income, and education. Particular attention should be paid to specific groups of women who may more likely not be aware of the lack of a proven biological relationship between emotional stress and reproduction.

     

Thickened Endometrium: When to Intervene? A Clinical Conundrum

The endometrium is a dynamic target organ in a woman’s reproductive life. It undergoes cyclical change regulated by the fine balance between oestrogen and progesterone. The endometrial thickness (ET) varies according to the phases of the menstrual cycle. Endometrium contains both oestrogen and progesterone receptors, which respond to above hormones, irrespective of whether the woman is in reproductive or menopausal phase. Abundance of oestrogen leads to endometrial hyperplasia, and paucity causes endometrial atrophy. The initial best modality of assessing ET or aberration is high resolution transvaginal ultrasonogram. Thickened endometrium is always a clinical conundrum. Dilemma does remain as to the thickness of endometrium which requires intervention, mostly in symptomatic pre and perimenopausal women. In post-menopausal women with bleeding, the cut-off of ET that warrants investigation is almost defined. However, the cut-off value of ET in asymptomatic postmenopausal women; beyond which intervention is required, is still debated. Dilemma also exists about the cut-off of ET in both symptomatic and asymptomatic women on HRT and Tamoxifen. This article will discuss the above issues and reach at some consensus about the cut-off of ET after critical analysis of evidence and experience and will help clinicians in arriving at a proper decision in dealing with such clinically confounding situations.