Volumetric changes of the graft after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with Bio-Oss and autogenous bone in different ratios: a radiographic study in minipigs

Objective: The objective of the present study was to learn about the volumetric changes of the graft after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with Bio‐Oss and autogenous bone from the iliac crest or the mandible in different ratios in minipigs. Material and methods: Bilateral maxillary sinus floor augmentation was performed in 40 minipigs with: (A) 100% autogenous bone, (B) 75% autogenous bone and 25% Bio‐Oss, (C) 50% autogenous bone and 50% Bio‐Oss, (D) 25% autogenous bone and 75% Bio‐Oss, and (E) 100% Bio‐Oss. The autogenous bone graft was harvested from the iliac crest or the mandible and the graft composition was selected at random and placed concomitant with implant placement. Computed tomographies of the maxillary sinuses were obtained preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and at euthanasia after 12 weeks. The volumetric changes of the graft were estimated using the Cavalieri principle and expressed as mean percentage with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: The mean volume of the graft was reduced by (A) 65% (95% CI: 60–70%), (B) 38% (95% CI: 35–41%), (C) 23% (95% CI: 21–25%), (D) 16% (95% CI: 12–21%), and (E) 6% (95% CI: 4–8%). The volumetric reduction was significantly influenced by the ratio of Bio‐Oss and autogenous bone (P<0.001), but not by the origin of the autogenous bone graft (P=0.2). Conclusions: The volume of autogenous bone grafts from the iliac crest and the mandible is reduced significantly after maxillary sinus floor augmentation in minipigs. The graft volume is better preserved after the addition of Bio‐Oss and the volumetric reduction is significantly influenced by the ratio of Bio‐Oss and autogenous bone. However, further studies are needed addressing the amount of new bone formation and bone‐to‐implant contact before the final conclusion can be made about the optimal ratio of Bio‐Oss and autogenous bone. To cite this article:
Jensen T, Schou S, Svendsen PA, Forman JL, Gundersen HJG, Terheyden H, Holmstrup P. Volumetric changes of the graft after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with Bio‐Oss and autogenous bone in different ratios: a radiographic study in minipigs.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 23 , 2012; 902–910
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2011.02245.x     

Maxillary sinus floor augmentation with Bio-Oss or Bio-Oss mixed with autogenous bone as graft: a systematic review

Aims: The objective of the present systematic review was to test the hypothesis of no differences in the implant treatment outcome when Bio‐Oss or Bio‐Oss mixed with autogenous bone is used as graft for the maxillary sinus floor augmentation (MSFA) applying the lateral window technique. Material and methods: A MEDLINE (PubMed) search in combination with a hand search of relevant journals was conducted by including human studies published in English from January 1, 1990 to June 1, 2010. The search provided 879 titles and 35 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Considerable variation in the included studies prevented meta‐analysis from being performed and no long‐term study comparing MSFA with the two treatment modalities was identified. Also, the survival of suprastructures after the two augmentation procedures was not compared within the same study. Results: The 1‐year implant survival was compared in one study demonstrating no statistically significant difference. The implant survival was 96% with Bio‐Oss and 94% with a mixture of 80% Bio‐Oss and 20% autogenous mandibular bone. Addition of a limited amount of autogenous bone to Bio‐Oss seemed not to increase the amount of new bone formation and bone‐to‐implant contact compared with Bio‐Oss. Conclusions: Therefore, the hypothesis of no differences between the use of Bio‐Oss or Bio‐Oss mixed with autogenous bone as graft for MSFA could neither be confirmed nor rejected. To cite this article : Jensen T, Schou S, Stavropoulos A, Terheyden H, Holmstrup P. Maxillary sinus floor augmentation with Bio‐Oss or Bio‐Oss mixed with autogenous bone as graft: a systematic review. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 23, 2012; 263–273
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2011.02168.x     

Deproteinized Bovine Bone Used as an Adjunct to Guided Bone Augmentation: An Experimental Study in the Rat

Background: Promising results have been reported following treatment of periodontal and peri‐implant bone defects with deproteinized bovine bone grafts, but their influence on bone formation has not been clarified. Purpose: The goal of this study was to examine whether implantation of deproteinized bovine bone (Bio‐Oss, Geistlich AG, Wolhusen, Switzerland) influences bone formation when used as an adjunct to guided bone augmentation (GBA). Materials and Methods: A rigid, hemispherical, Teflon capsule was loosely packed with a standardized quantity of Bio‐Oss and placed with its open part facing the lateral surface of the mandibular ramus (test) in 30 rats. At the contralateral side of the jaw, an empty capsule was placed (control). Groups of 10 animals were sacrificed after 1, 2, and 4 months. The volumes of the space created by the capsule and of the (1) newly formed bone, (2) remaining Bio‐Oss particles, (3) soft connective tissue, and (4) acellular space in the capsule were estimated by a point‐counting technique in three or four histologie sections, taken by uniformly random sampling. Results: Bone formation at 1 month was limited in both tests and controls. After 2 months, the mean volume of the newly formed bone occupied 9.0% of the space created by the capsule in the test specimens compared with 23.8% in the control specimens (p <.01). After 4 months, the respective figures were 11.6% (tests) versus 38.7% (controls) (p <.01). Conclusion: It can be concluded that Bio‐Oss, used as an adjunct to GBA, interferes with bone formation.     

Apical and marginal bone alterations around implants in maxillary sinus augmentation grafted with autogenous bone or bovine bone material and simultaneous or delayed dental implant positioning

Objective: A re‐pneumatization phenomenon was recorded in sinuses grafted with different materials. The specific aims of this paper were to assess the dental implant survival rate and the behavior of marginal and apical bone remodeling around dental implants placed following sinus augmentation. Materials and methods: A retrospective study was conducted on consecutive patients treated in two surgical centers. Different surgical techniques were adopted for sinus augmentation: simultaneous or delayed dental implant insertion with bovine bone‐material augmentation or autologous bone grafting (chin and iliac crest). Survival rates were recorded for the overall number of implants (patients of group A). Apical and marginal bone levels (ABL and MBL, respectively) were radiographically measured, and statistical analysis was performed in implants of a subgroup of patients (group B). Results: A total of 282 dental implants were positioned. Recorded cumulative survival rates (CSRs) were 95.6% and 100% for autogenous and bovine bone material, respectively, while CSRs at 2‐year follow‐up for immediate and delayed procedures were 99.3% and 96.5%. For the subgroup B, 57 sinus augmentation procedures were performed in 39 patients, with the positioning of 154 implants. Generally, the apical‐ and marginal‐bone resorption of the bovine bone‐material group was less than that of the autogenous group. The differences between the ABL values of the bovine bone‐material and iliac‐crest groups were statistically significant at 1 year, whereas this significance disappeared at the 2‐year follow‐up; tests showed that a statistical difference was recorded in the bovine bone‐material group between the 1‐ and 2‐year follow‐ups. With regard to MBL comparisons between simultaneous and delayed implantation, the differences maintained their significance at the 2‐year follow‐up also. Conclusions: Differences regarding apical bone alteration between autogenous bone from the iliac crest and bovine bone material at the 1‐ and 2‐year follow‐ups, as well as in the bovine bone‐material group between the 1‐ and 2‐year follow‐ups, attested to slower but more prolonged physiologic bone remodeling in the bovine‐graft‐material group than in the autogenous‐bone group. The MBL analysis showed that remodeling in the delayed implant group demonstrated a greater resorption in the cervical portion than was seen in the simultaneous implant group. To cite this article:
Sbordone L, Levin L, Guidetti F, Sbordone C, Glikman A, Schwartz‐Arad D. Apical and marginal bone alterations around implants in maxillary sinus augmentation grafted with autogenous bone or bovine bone material and simultaneous or delayed dental implant positioning.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res 22 , 2011; 485–491
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2010.02030.x     

Reconstruction of severely resorbed alveolar ridge crests with dental implants using a bovine bone mineral for augmentation

This study reviews the outcome of implant placement in 61 patients after augmentation of severely atrophic alveolar bone with a bovine bone mineral, Bio-Oss. Bone augmentation was performed at 4 different sites: alveolar crest width, alveolar crest height, antral cavity, or nasal cavity. After a mean healing time of 11.9 months, 231 implants were placed in Bio-Oss bone. The time of loading of the implants varied between 12 and 113 months. Calculated from the time of implant placement and irrespective of loading time, a survival rate of 80.5% for the individual implants was estimated. In most patients (73%), Bio-Oss was mixed with autogenous bone from the chin. However, the results indicated that autogenous bone may be excluded from the Bio-Oss graft.     

Interventions for replacing missing teeth: bone augmentation techniques for dental implant treatment

Background: Dental implants require sufficient bone to be adequately stabilized. For some patients implant treatment would not be an option without bone augmentation. A variety of materials and surgical techniques are available for bone augmentation. Objectives: General objectives: To test the null hypothesis of no difference in the success, function, morbidity and patient satisfaction between different bone augmentation techniques for dental implant treatment. Specific objectives: (A) to test whether and when augmentation procedures are necessary; (B) to test which is the most effective augmentation technique for specific clinical indications. Trials were divided into three broad categories according to different indications for the bone augmentation techniques: (1) major vertical or horizontal bone augmentation or both; (2) implants placed in extraction sockets; (3) fenestrated implants. Search strategy: The Cochrane Oral Health Group’s Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched. Several dental journals were handsearched. The bibliographies of review articles were checked, and personal references were searched. More than 55 implant manufacturing companies were also contacted. Last electronic search was conducted on 9 January 2008. Selection criteria: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of different techniques and materials for augmenting bone for implant treatment reporting the outcome of implant therapy at least to abutment connection. Data collection and analysis: Screening of eligible studies, assessment of the methodological quality of the trials and data extraction were conducted independently and in duplicate. Authors were contacted for any missing information. Results were expressed as random‐effects models using mean differences for continuous outcomes and odd ratios for dichotomous outcomes with 95% confidence intervals. The statistical unit of the analysis was the patient. Main results: Seventeen RCTs out of 40 potentially eligible trials reporting the outcome of 455 patients were suitable for inclusion. Since different techniques were evaluated in different trials, no meta‐analysis could be performed. Ten trials evaluated different techniques for vertical or horizontal bone augmentation or both. Four trials evaluated different techniques of bone grafting for implants placed in extraction sockets and three trials evaluated different techniques to treat bone dehiscence or fenestrations around implants. Authors’ conclusions: Major bone grafting procedures of resorbed mandibles may not be justified. Bone substitutes (Bio‐Oss or Cerasorb) may replace autogenous bone for sinus lift procedures of atrophic maxillary sinuses. Various techniques can augment bone horizontally and vertically, but it is unclear which is the most efficient. It is unclear whether augmentation procedures at immediate single implants placed in fresh extraction sockets are needed, and which is the most effective augmentation procedure, however, sites treated with barrier plus Bio‐Oss showed a higher position of the gingival margin when compared to sites treated with barriers alone. Non‐resorbable barriers at fenestrated implants regenerated more bone than no barriers, however it remains unclear whether such bone is of benefit to the patient. It is unclear which is the most effective technique for augmenting bone around fenestrated implants. Bone morphogenetic proteins may enhance bone formation around implants grafted with Bio‐Oss. Titanium may be preferable to resorbable screws to fixate onlay bone grafts. The use of particulate autogenous bone from intraoral locations, also taken with dedicated aspirators, might be associated with an increased risk of infective complications. These findings are based on few trials including few patients, sometimes having short follow up, and often being judged to be at high risk of bias.     

A new technique for reconstruction of the atrophied narrow alveolar crest in the maxilla using morselized impacted bone allograft and later placement of dental implants

Background: In cases when the alveolar crest is too narrow to host an implant, lateral augmentation is required. The use of autogenous bone blocks harvested from the iliac crest is often demanded. One disadvantage is the associated patient morbidity. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to clinically and histologically evaluate the use of morselized impacted bone allograft, a novel technique for reconstruction of the narrow alveolar crest. Materials and Methods: Two patients with completely edentulous maxillae and one partially edentulous, with a mean age of 77 years (range 76–79 years) were included in the study. The alveolar crest width was <3 mm without possibility to place any implant. Bone grafts were taken from a bone bank in Gävle Hospital. Bone from the neck of femur heads was milled to produce bone chips. The milled bone was partially defatted by rinsing in 37°C saline solution. After compression of the graft pieces with a size of 15 mm (height), 30 mm (length), and 6 mm (width), they were then fit to adapt to the buccal surface of the atrophied alveolar crest. One piece was placed to the right and one to the left side of the midline. On both sides fibrin glue was used (Tisseel®, Baxter AG, Vienna, Austria) to stabilize the graft. After 6 months of graft healing, dental implants were placed, simultaneously biopsies were harvested and in one patient two oxidized microimplants were placed. At the time of abutment connection, microimplants were retrieved with surrounding bone for histology. Fixed screw‐retained bridges were fabricated in mean of 7 months after implant surgery. Radiographs were taken before and after implant surgery and after 1 year of loading. Results: Sixteen implants with an oxidized surface were placed (TiUnite®, Nobel Biocare AB, Göteborg, Sweden). After 1 year of functional loading, all implants were clinically stable. The marginal bone loss was 1.4 mm (SD 0.3) after 1 year of loading. The histological examination showed resorption and subsequent bone formation on the allograft particles. There were no signs of inflammatory cell infiltration in conjunction with the allograft. The two microimplants showed bone formation directly on the implant surface. Conclusions: This study shows that morselized impacted bone allograft can be used to increase the width of the atrophied narrow alveolar crest as a good alternative to autogenous bone grafts in elderly patients. The histological examination of biopsies revealed a normal incorporation process and no signs of an immunological reaction. Further studies with larger samples are of important to be able to conclude if equal results can be obtained using morselized impacted bone allograft as for autogenous bone graft.     

Ridge alterations following immediate implant placement and the treatment of bone defects with Bio-Oss in an animal model

Background: Conflicting data exist on the outcome of placing Bio‐Oss® (Geitslich Pharm AG, Wolhausen, Switzerland) into extraction sockets. It is therefore relevant to study whether the incorporation of Bio‐Oss into extraction sockets would influence bone healing outcome at the extraction sites. Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess peri‐implant bone changes when implants were placed in fresh extraction sockets and the remaining defects were filled with Bio‐Oss particles in a canine mandible model. Materials and Methods: Six mongrel dogs were used in the study. In one jaw quadrant of each animal, the fourth mandibular premolars were extracted with an elevation of the mucoperiosteal flap; implants were then placed in the fresh extraction sockets and the remaining defects were filled with Bio‐Oss particles. After 4 months of healing, micro‐computed tomography at the implant sites was performed. Osseointegration was calculated as the percent of implant surface in contact with bone. Additionally, bone height was measured in the peri‐implant bone. Results: Average osseointegration was 28.5% (ranged between 14.8 and 34.2%). The mean crestal bone loss was 4.7 ± 2.1 mm on the buccal aspect, 0.4 ± 0.5 mm on the mesial aspect, 0.4 ± 0.3 mm on the distal aspect, and 0.3 ± 0.4 mm on the lingual aspect. Conclusion: The findings from this study demonstrated that the placement of implants and Bio‐Oss® particles into fresh extraction sockets resulted in significant buccal bone loss with low osseointegration.     

Magnesium-enriched hydroxyapatite at immediate implants: a histomorphometric study in dogs

Aim: To evaluate the influence of magnesium‐enriched hydroxyapatite (MHA) (SintLife^®) on bone contour preservation and osseointegration at implants placed immediately into extraction sockets. Material and methods: In the mandibular pre‐molar region, implants were installed immediately into extraction sockets of six Labrador dogs. MHA was placed at test sites, while the control sites did not receive augmentation materials. Implants were intended to heal in a submerged mode. After 4 months of healing, the animals were sacrificed, and ground sections were obtained for histomorphometric evaluation. Results: After 4 months of healing, one control implant was not integrated leaving n=5 test and control implants for evaluation. Both at the test and the control sites, bone resorption occurred. While the most coronal bone‐to‐implant contact was similar between test and control sites, the alveolar bony crest outline was maintained to a higher degree at the buccal aspect of the test sites (loss: 0.7 mm) compared with the control sites (loss: 1.2 mm), even though this difference did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions: The use of MHA to fill the defect around implants placed into the alveolus immediately after tooth extraction did not contribute significantly to the maintenance of the contours of the buccal alveolar bone crest. To cite this article:
Caneva M, Botticelli D, Stellini E, Souza SLS, Salata LA, Lang NP. Magnesium‐enriched hydroxyapatite at immediate implants: a histomorphometric study in dogs.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 22 , 2011; 512–517
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2010.02040.x     

Vertical ridge augmentation by expanded-polytetrafluoroethylene membrane and a combination of intraoral autogenous bone graft and deproteinized anorganic bovine bone (Bio Oss)

Objective: To evaluate, from a histological and histomorphometrical perspective, the efficacy of a 1 : 1 mixture of deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) and autogenous bone graft associated with an expanded‐polytetrafluoroethylene (e‐PTFE) membrane for vertical ridge augmentation in the human. Material and methods: Seven patients with 10 surgical sites requiring vertical ridge augmentation of partially edentulous lower jaws were included in the study. The vertical augmentation procedure was performed combining a titanium‐reinforced e‐PTFE Gore‐Tex membrane with a composite graft consisting of a 1 : 1 ratio of DBBM (Bio‐Oss) and autogenous bone. Twenty‐seven Branemark implants have been inserted. Eleven biopsies from the regenerated area were analyzed histologically and histomorphometrically. Results: The healing period was uneventful in nine surgical sites. In one site the membrane showed an exposure after 3 months. At the abutment connection, all implants appeared stable and submerged by a hard regenerated tissue clinically similar to bone. The histological analysis showed new bone formation and ongoing remodelling of the autogenous bone and the DBBM particles. Conclusions: The findings from the present clinical and histological study support the use of a 1 : 1 combination of DBBM and autogenous bone chips for vertical ridge augmentation by means of guided bone regeneration techniques. The regenerated bone may lead to proper osseointegration of a dental implant inserted at the time of the regenerative procedure or after a healing period of at least 6 months. DBBM undergoes very slow resorption and substitution with new bone. Furthermore, long‐term clinical studies are needed to confirm the positive effect of DBBM in enhancing the lasting stability of the vertically augmented bone.     

Early Healing of Hydroxyapatite‐Coated Implants in Grafted Bone of Zoledronic Acid–Treated Osteoporotic Rabbits

Background: Resorption of grafted bone and delayed osseointegration of implants are main problems associated with alveolar bone augmentation in dental implantology, especially for patients with osteoporosis. The aim of this study is to investigate the early healing response of implants to systemic treatment of zoledronic acid (ZA) in autogenous grafted iliac bone of osteoporotic rabbits. Methods: Ovariectomy (OVX) or sham operation was performed in 46 rabbits, and osteoporotic changes were verified in animals receiving OVX 3 months later. The remaining animals were divided into three groups (n = 12): sham, OVX, and OVX with ZA treatment (ZA group). Autogenous iliac bone grafting was performed in bilateral tibiae, and hydroxyapatite‐coated titanium implants were simultaneously placed into the grafted bone. The animals were sacrificed 2 and 8 weeks later for examination. Results: At both time points, systemic treatment of ZA efficiently promoted bone healing of implants in grafted bone, and all histologic and microcomputed tomography bone indices, including mineralized bone volume, implant–bone contact ratio, connectivity density, trabecular thickness, and trabecular number, were significantly increased in the ZA group compared with the OVX‐only group (P <0.01); implant–bone contact rates in the ZA group were even restored to levels similar to those of sham‐operated animals (P >0.05). Furthermore, biomechanical testing demonstrated that removal torque of implants was significantly increased in the ZA group compared with the OVX group (P <0.01). Conclusion: Systemic treatment with ZA could efficiently promote early bone healing of implants in autogenous grafted bone of osteoporotic rabbits by increasing early osseointegration and fixation of implants.     

Staged horizontal bone augmentation for dental implants in aesthetic zones: A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial comparing a half-columnar bone block harvested from the ramus versus a rectangular bone block from the symphysis

In this study, the clinical outcomes of horizontal ridge augmentation using half-columnar bone grafts from the ramus (group I: 27 patients, 32 implants) versus rectangular bone grafts from the symphysis (group II: 19 patients, 27 implants) were compared; grafts were combined with organic bovine bone and collagen membrane. Cone beam computed tomography images were obtained preoperatively, immediately after restoration (baseline), and 1 year after loading. Four months after grafting, horizontal bone resorption at the alveolar crest did not differ significantly between the two groups (P = 0.291). At 4 mm apical to the alveolar crest, horizontal bone resorption in group I was significantly less than that in group II (P = 0.041). One year after loading, horizontal bone resorption in group I was lower than that in group II, with no significant difference. The residual thickness of the labial bone at the implant site in group I was significantly higher than that in group II. Horizontal ridge augmentation with either a half-columnar autogenous graft from the ramus or a rectangular autogenous graft from the symphysis can provide acceptable results in aesthetic regions. The half-columnar group demonstrated better graft stability both at 4 months after augmentation and 1 year after loading.     

Maxillary sinus augmentation with autologous bone harvested from the lateral maxillary wall combined with bovine‐derived hydroxyapatite: clinical and histologic observations

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the clinical efficacy of a mixture of autologous bone harvested from the lateral wall of the maxilla using bone shavers and bovine‐derived hydroxyapatite (HA) placed as a graft to elevate the maxillary sinus floor. The histological picture of tissue found in the sinus, the survival rate and the success of the implants were all evaluated. Material and methods: A total of 90 titanium implants were placed in 34 patients. In all of them, the lateral maxillary wall was harvested as a particulate bone graft, subsequently mixed with bovine‐derived HA and packed in the sinus cavity. The lateral access window was then covered with a bioresorbable porcine‐derived collagen membrane. In 32 sinuses, a two‐stage surgery was performed, while in the remaining 10 cases a one‐stage surgery was carried out. In the two‐stage approach, 14 randomly selected biopsies were obtained at the time of implant insertion after a healing period of 9 months. The histological specimens were histologically and histomorphometrically evaluated. Results: One implant was lost, leading to a survival rate of 98.9%. The new bone consisted of lamellae of living bone contained osteocytes and in close contact with bovine bone particles that were partly infiltrated by newly formed bone. Bovine bone particle resorption could not be found. The histomorphometric analysis showed the following averages: 29% of newly formed bone and 21% of anorganic bovine bone. The marrow spaces made up the remaining 50% of the specimens. Conclusion: Sinus lift graft with autologous bone harvested from the maxillary lateral wall combined with demineralized bovine bone leads to a predictable outcome regarding the amount of bone formation in sinus floor augmentation. To cite this article:
de Vicente JC, Hernández‐Vallejo G, Braña‐Abascal P, Peña I. Maxillary sinus augmentation with autologous bone harvested from the lateral maxillary wall combined with bovine‐derived hydroxyapatite: clinical and histologic observations.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 21 , 2010; 430–438
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2009.01877.x     

Influence of residual alveolar bone height on implant stability in the maxilla: an experimental animal study

Aims/Background: Empirically, for implant placement associated with sinus floor augmentation, a minimum of five mm of residual crestal bone height has been recommended in order to achieve sufficient initial implant stability. It has been the aim of the study to test this assumption in an experimental animal trial. Material and methods: In eight mini pigs, three premolars and two molars were removed on one side of the maxilla. Three months later the animals were assigned to four groups of two animals each. A cavity was created at the base of the alveolar process so that the residual bone height was reduced to 2, 4, 6 and 8 mm, respectively. The coronal part of the alveolar crest remained unchanged. An inlay augmentation procedure was carried out using a particulated autogenous bone graft from the iliac crest, and six implants (Xive, diameter 3.8 mm, length 13 mm) were placed. Implant stability was assessed by resonance frequency analysis at the time of implant placement (T0), after 6 months of unloaded healing (T1) and after 6 months of functional loading (T2). Results: During follow‐up, two implants were lost in sites with a residual alveolar bone height of 2 mm. At the time of implant placement, resonance frequencies were 6754.4±268, 6500.3±281.5, 6890.3±255.4 and 7877.9±233.7 Hz for residual bone heights of 2, 4, 6 and 8 mm, respectively. At stage‐two surgery and after 6 months of functional loading, resonance frequencies were 6431.7±290.8, 6351.8±437.6, 6213.4±376.2 and 6826.8±458.9 Hz vs. 6171±437.4, 6047±572.4, 6156.7±272.6 and 6412.8±283.5 Hz. Statistical analysis revealed an association of residual alveolar height and implant stability at T0 and T1 only (P<0.01), while bone height was not found to influence implant survival. Conclusion: The results of the present trial demonstrate an association of alveolar bone height and implant stability at the time of implant placement and stage‐two surgery. Yet the assumption that 5 mm of residual crestal bone height is a relevant threshold for simultaneous implant placement and sinus floor augmentation is not supported from an experimental point of view.     

Bio-Oss collagen in the buccal gap at immediate implants: a 6-month study in the dog

Background: Following tooth extraction and immediate implant installation, the edentulous site of the alveolar process undergoes substantial bone modeling and the ridge dimensions are reduced. Objective: The objective of the present experiment was to determine whether the process of bone modeling following tooth extraction and immediate implant placement was influenced by the placement of a xenogenic graft in the void that occurred between the implant and the walls of the fresh extraction socket. Material and methods: Five beagle dogs about 1 year old were used. The 4th premolar in both quadrants of the mandible (₄P₄) were selected and used as experimental sites. The premolars were hemi‐sected and the distal roots removed and, subsequently, implants were inserted in the distal sockets. In one side of the jaw, the marginal buccal‐approximal void that consistently occurred between the implant and the socket walls was grafted with Bio‐Oss^® Collagen while no grafting was performed in the contra‐lateral sites. After 6 months of healing, biopsies from each experimental site were obtained and prepared for histological analyses. Results: The outline of the marginal hard tissue of the control sites was markedly different from that of the grafted sites. Thus, while the buccal bone crest in the grafted sites was comparatively thick and located at or close to the SLA border, the corresponding crest at the control sites was thinner and located a varying distance below SLA border. Conclusions: It was demonstrated that the placement of Bio‐Oss^® Collagen in the void between the implant and the buccal‐approximal bone walls of fresh extraction sockets modified the process of hard tissue healing, provided additional amounts of hard tissue at the entrance of the previous socket and improved the level of marginal bone‐to‐implant contact. To cite this article:
Araújo MG, Linder E, Lindhe J. Bio‐Oss^® Collagen in the buccal gap at immediate implants: a 6‐month study in the dog.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 22 , 2011; 1–8.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2010.01920.x     

Augmentation of exposed implant threads with autogenous bone chips: prospective clinical study

Background: Autogenous bone chips can be harvested during drilling of implant sites and may be used as a graft material for bone augmentation and coverage of exposed implant threads. Purpose: The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the possibility of augmenting exposed implant threads with autogenous bone chips. Materials and Methods: Twenty‐one consecutive patients treated with screw‐shaped oral implants with exposed threads due to buccal fenestration or marginal defects were augmented with autogenous bone harvested with a bone trap during drilling of the implant site. Both marginal (9 sites) and fenestration defects (12 sites), with 4 to 14 exposed implant threads, were registered clinically and with photography. The number of exposed implant threads was measured before and at second‐stage surgery 6 months after augmentation. Results: Complete bone coverage of the exposed implant threads was seen in 12 of the 21 implant sites. Six sites showed one to two remaining exposed threads, two showed about 40% coverage, and one showed flattening of the defect but with eight of nine exposed threads at 6 months follow‐up. The mean bone gain was 81% in patients with a marginal defect and 82% in patients with a fenestration defect. Conclusion: The results from this clinical study show that it is possible to gain bone over exposed implant threads by augmentation with autogenous bone chips. Conclusion It is concluded that it is possible to achieve coverage of exposed implant threads by augmentation with autogenous bone chips harvested during drilling of implant sites.     

Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Two Bone Substitutes in the Treatment of Bony Dehiscences

Aim: This in vivo split‐mouth randomized controlled trial compared a synthetic bone substitute with a bovine bone mineral to cover bone dehiscences after implant insertion. Materials and Methods: Fourteen patients received four to six implants to support an overdenture. Two comparable dehiscences within the same patient were first covered with a layer of autogenous bone, followed by a layer of either Bio‐Oss® (group 1; Geistlich Pharma AG, Wolhusen, Switzerland) or Straumann BoneCeramic® (group 2; Institut Straumann AG, Basel, Switzerland) and sealed by a resorbable membrane. The change in vertical dimension of the defect was measured at implant placement and at abutment connection (6.5 months). Clinical and radiological parameters were evaluated up to 1 year of loading. Results: The vertical size of the defect at surgery was 6.4 ± 1.6 mm for group 1 and 6.4 ± 2.2 mm for group 2 sites, measured from the implant shoulder. After 6.5 months, the depth of the defect was reduced to 1.5 ± 1.2 mm and 1.9 ± 1.2 mm for group 1 and group 2 sites, respectively (p > 0.05). No implants failed during follow‐up. Mean marginal bone loss over the SLActive surface was 0.94 mm (group 1), 0.81 mm (group 2), and 0.93 mm (group 3, no dehiscence) after 1 year of loading. Conclusion: Both bone substitutes behaved equally effectively.     

Maxillary sinus floor elevation with bovine bone mineral combined with either autogenous bone or autogenous stem cells: a prospective randomized clinical trial

Aim: To assess whether differences occur in bone formation after maxillary sinus floor elevation surgery with bovine bone mineral (BioOss^®) mixed with autogenous bone or autogenous stem cells. The primary endpoint was the percentage of new bone three months after the elevation procedure. Material and methods: In a randomized, controlled split‐mouth design, in 12 consecutive patients (age 60.8 ± 5.9 years, range 48–69 years) needing reconstruction of their atrophic maxilla, a bilateral sinus floor augmentation procedure was performed. Randomly, on one side the augmentation procedure was performed with bovine bone mineral (BioOss^®) seeded with mononuclear stem cells harvested from the posterior iliac crest (test group) while BioOss^® mixed with autogenous bone (harvested from the retromolar area) was applied on the contra‐lateral side (control group). On 14.8 ± 0.7 weeks after the sinus floor elevation, biopsies from the reconstructed areas were taken at the spots where subsequently the endosseous implants were placed. The biopsies were histomorphometrically analyzed. Results: Significantly more bone formation was observed in the test group (17.7 ± 7.3%) when compared with the control group (12.0%± 6.6; P=0.026). In both the test and control group, all implants could be placed with primary stability. In one patient, not all biopsies contained BioOss^®. This patient was excluded from analysis. Conclusion: Mesenchymal stem cells seeded on BioOss^® particles can induce the formation of a sufficient volume of new bone to enable the reliable placement of implants within a time frame comparable with that of applying either solely autogenous bone or a mixture of autogenous bone and BioOss^®. This technique could be an alternative to using autografts. To cite this article: Rickert D, Sauerbier S, Nagursky H, Menne D, Vissink A, Raghoebar GM. Maxillary sinus floor elevation with bovine bone mineral combined with either autogenous bone or autogenous stem cells: a prospective randomized clinical trial.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 22 , 2011; 251–258.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2010.01981.x     

Maxillary bone grafting for insertion of endosseous implants: results after 12-124 months

Abstract: Insertion of endosseous implants in the atrophic maxilla is often complicated because of lack of supporting bone. Augmentation of the floor of the maxillary sinus with autogenous bone graft has been proven to be a reliable treatment modality, at least in the short term. The long‐term clinical and radiographic outcome with regard to the grafts, the implants and satisfaction of the patients with their implant‐supported overdenture was studied in 99 patients. The sinus floor was augmented with bone grafts derived from the iliac crest (83 subjects, 162 sinuses, 353 implants), the mandibular symphysis (14, 18, 37), or the maxillary tuberosity (2, 2, 2). Before implant installation, the width and height of the alveolar crest were increased in a first stage procedure in 74 patients, while in the other 25 patients augmentation and implant installation could be performed simultaneously (width and height of the alveolar crest >5 mm). Perforation of the sinus membrane occurred in 47 cases, which did not predispose to the development of sinusitis. Loss of bone particles and sequestration were observed in one (diabetic) patient only, in whom a dehiscence of the oral mucosa occurred. A second augmentation procedure was successful in this patient. Symptoms of transient sinusitis were observed in 3 patients. These symptoms were successfully treated with decongestants and antibiotics. 2 other patients developed a purulent sinusitis which resolved after a nasal antrostomy. In all cases, the bone volume was sufficient for implant insertion. 32 of 392 inserted Brånemark implants (8.2%) were lost during the follow‐up. After the healing period of the bone grafts, no sinus pathology was observed. The patients received implant‐supported overdentures (72 patients) or fixed bridges (27 patients). Overall, the patients were very satisfied with the prosthetic construction. We conclude that bone grafting of the floor of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous bone for the insertion of implants is a reliable treatment modality with good long‐term results.     

Effect of grafting materials on osseointegration of dental implants surrounded by circumferential bone defects. An experimental study in the dog

Aims: This study was designed to evaluate the effect of gap width and graft placement on bone healing around implants placed into simulated extraction sockets in the mandibles of four beagle dogs. Materials and methods: Four Ti‐Unite^® implants (13 mm × 3.3 mm) were placed on each side of the mandible. Three implants were surrounded by a 1.35 mm circumferential and a 5 mm deep gap around the coronal portion of the implants. A fourth implant was inserted conventionally into both sides of the mandibles as a positive control. The gaps were filled with either Bio‐Oss^®, autogenous bone or with a blood clot alone. The study design was balanced for animal, side and modality. Ground sections were prepared from biopsies taken at 3 months, and computer‐aided histometric measurements of bone/implant contact and area of bone within threads were made for the coronal 5 mm. Data were analysed using analysis of variance. Results: The mean bone/implant contact was 9.8 mm for the control and ranged from 9.3 to 11.3 mm for the three test modalities. The corresponding values for area within threads were 1 mm² and 1–1.2 mm². Modality had a significant effect on both bone/implant contact (F=16.9; P<0.0001) and area within threads (F=16.7; P<0.0001). Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that both autogenous bone graft and Bio‐Oss^® played an important role in the amount of hard tissue fill and osseointegration occurring within marginal bone defects around implants.