Innovations in minimally invasive surgery: lessons learned from translational animal models

Purpose

Animal models are key elements of surgical research and promotion of new techniques. Inanimate models, anatomical specimens, and living animals are all necessary to solve the various problems encountered by the advent of a new surgical technique. The development of Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) procedures is a representative model.

Methods

Over 400 experimental procedures were performed in inanimate models, ex vivo tissues and animals to solve all problems faced by the development of NOTES surgery: peritoneal access, gastrotomy closure, exposure, retraction, dissection as well as education to start this new procedure.

Results

The successive use of all models allows to identify the ideal solution for each problem and to precisely define the safest and most reliable option to apply the new technique in patients. It allowed to perform the first transvaginal and transgastric cholecystectomy in patients in a safe way.

Conclusion

Animal experimentation remains necessary as even sophisticated computer-based solutions are unable to model all interactions between molecules, cells, tissues, organisms, and their environment. Animal research is required in many areas to validate new technologies, develop training, let alone its major goal (namely to avoid using patients for experimentation) which is to be the first “model” for the surgeon.     

Dedicated minimally invasive surgery suites increase operating room efficiency

Background: The rapid adoption of laparoscopic surgery since the late 1980s added tremendous complexity into the operating room (OR) environment. For each case, a plethora of additional equipment-including monitors, video equipment, wiring, tubing, and cords-had to be set up, prolonging OR turnover time and decreasing OR efficiency. In 1993, the concept of designated minimally invasive surgery (MIS) suites was introduced. MIS suites integrated monitors and video equipment into the OR on ceiling-mounted columns and moved the controls to a centralized nursing station. The overall effect of this innovation on OR efficiency has not been measured. Methods: Five RNs with varying degrees of MIS experience were instructed on video setup and put-away criteria and then timed while performing a set of standardized tasks. Each set of tasks was performed twice using a standardized surgery model. Differences in setup and put-away times between MIS suites and standard ORs were tested using the t-test for paired comparisons. Results: The mean ± standard deviation (SD) video setup times were 27.9 ± 5.3 sec (MIS) and 254.3 ± 54.0 sec (standard); the put-away times were 19.8 ± 2.7 sec (MIS) and 222.3 ± 26.0 sec (standard). The mean difference ± standard error (SE) in both the setup (226.4 ± 16.9 sec, p = 0.0001) and put-away times (202.5 ± 8.6, p = 0.0001) were large and statistically significant. Conclusion: Using a simulation model, we have demonstrated that the use of a MIS suite reduces video setup and put-away time significantly, with the potential for significant associated cost savings. This provides just one justification for the high cost of building such "ORs of the future."     

100 consecutive minimally invasive Heller myotomies: lessons learned

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the authors' first 100 patients treated for achalasia by a minimally invasive approach. METHODS: Between November 1992 and February 2001, the authors performed 95 laparoscopic and 5 thoracoscopic Heller myotomies in 100 patients (age 49.5 +/- 1.5 years) with manometrically confirmed achalasia. Before presentation, 51 patients had previous dilation, 23 had been treated with botulinum toxin (Botox), and 4 had undergone prior myotomy. Laparoscopic myotomy was performed by incising the distal 4 to 6 cm of esophageal musculature and extended 1 to 2 cm onto the cardia under endoscopic guidance. Fifteen patients underwent antireflux procedures. RESULTS: There were eight intraoperative perforations and only four conversions to open surgery. Follow-up is 10.8 +/- 1 months; 75% of the patients have been followed up for at least 14 months. Outcomes assessed by patient questionnaires revealed satisfactory relief of dysphagia in 93 patients and "poor" relief in 7 patients. Postoperative heartburn symptoms were reported as "moderate to severe" in 14 patients and "none or mild" in 86 patients. Fourteen patients required postoperative procedures for continued symptoms of dysphagia after myotomy. Esophageal manometry studies revealed a decrease in lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP) from 37 +/- 1 mm Hg to 14 +/- 1 mm Hg. Patients with a decrease in LESP of more than 18 mm Hg and whose absolute postoperative LESP was 18 or less were more likely to have relief of dysphagia after surgery. Thirty-one patients who underwent Heller alone were studied with a 24-hour esophageal pH probe and had a median Johnson-DeMeester score of 10 (normal <22.0). Mean esophageal acid exposure time was 3 +/- 0.6% (normal 4.2%). Symptoms did not correlate with esophageal acid exposure. CONCLUSIONS: The results after minimally invasive treatment for achalasia are equivalent to historical outcomes with open techniques. Satisfactory outcomes occurred in 93% of patients. Patients whose postoperative LESP was less than 18 mm Hg reported the fewest symptoms. After myotomy, patients rarely have abnormal esophageal acid exposure, and the addition of an antireflux procedure is not required.     

Time management in the operating room: an analysis of the dedicated minimally invasive surgery suite.

BACKGROUND: Dedicated minimally invasive surgery suites are available that contain specialized equipment to facilitate endoscopic surgery. Laparoscopy performed in a general operating room is hampered by the multitude of additional equipment that must be transported into the room. The objective of this study was to compare the preparation times between procedures performed in traditional operating rooms versus dedicated minimally invasive surgery suites to see whether operating room efficiency is improved in the specialized room. METHODS: The records of 50 patients who underwent laparoscopic procedures between September 2000 and April 2002 were retrospectively reviewed. Twenty-three patients underwent surgery in a general operating room and 18 patients in an minimally invasive surgery suite. Nine patients were excluded because of cystoscopic procedures undergone prior to laparoscopy. Various time points were recorded from which various time intervals were derived, such as preanesthesia time, anesthesia induction time, and total preparation time. A 2-tailed, unpaired Student t test was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The mean preanesthesia time was significantly faster in the minimally invasive surgery suite (12.2 minutes) compared with that in the traditional operating room (17.8 minutes) (P=0.013). Mean anesthesia induction time in the minimally invasive surgery suite (47.5 minutes) was similar to time in the traditional operating room (45.7 minutes) (P=0.734). The average total preparation time for the minimally invasive surgery suite (59.6 minutes) was not significantly faster than that in the general operating room (63.5 minutes) (P=0.481). CONCLUSION: The amount of time that elapses between the patient entering the room and anesthesia induction is statically shorter in a dedicated minimally invasive surgery suite. Laparoscopic surgery is performed more efficiently in a dedicated minimally invasive surgery suite versus a traditional operating room.     

Tactile feedback is present during minimally invasive surgery.

BACKGROUND: The applications of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and laparoscopy are rapidly expanding. Despite this expansion, our understanding of the importance of haptic feedback during laparoscopic surgery is incomplete. Although many surgeons believe that the use of minimally invasive techniques eliminates force feedback and tactile sensation (haptics), the importance of haptics in MIS has not been fully evaluated. There is considerable interest in the development of simulators for MIS even though the importance of force feedback remains poorly understood. This study was designed to determine the ability of experienced surgeons to interpret haptic feedback with respect to texture, shape, and consistency of an object. STUDY DESIGN: A randomized, single-blinded study was designed. Twenty surgeons were presented objects in a random order, with participants blinded as to their identity. Inspection by direct palpation, conventional instruments, and laparoscopic instruments was performed on all objects. Statistic analysis of the data was performed using chi-square analysis and, when appropriate, a Fischer exact probability test. RESULTS: Direct palpation was associated with the highest accuracy for shape identification and was superior to both conventional instruments (p < 0.001) and laparoscopic instruments (p<0.001). Fine texture analysis with either a conventional instrument or a laparoscopic instrument was superior to direct palpation (p < 0.05). Finally, the three methods of analysis were comparable for consistency analysis. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that laparoscopic instruments do, in fact, provide surgeons with haptic feedback. Interpretation of the texture, shape, and consistency of objects can be performed. In some situations, laparoscopic instruments appear to amplify the haptic information available. Our ongoing work is directed at further defining force interactions.     

An ambulatory surgery center and minimally invasive surgery: lessons from experience

The author draws on the experience with a large privately owned freestanding surgery center to extract some principles that were felt to contribute to the growth and financial success of the center. Identifying the desired outcomes and the core processes that implement and facilitate those outcomes is critical. Concentration on these creates true value from the perspective of the patient, the physician, and the investor. This process, if implemented fully, affects everything from the architectural design of the entire building to the design of an individual operating room and the operational processes necessary to provide services. This process also has applicability to minimally invasive surgery because the rapid adaptation of more complex procedures to the outpatient environment, the interplay between expensive capital and equipment expenditures, and the reimbursement issues affects the growth of minimally invasive surgery in an ambulatory surgery center. This provides a unique opportunity to also rethink the ergonomic and design considerations of minimally invasive surgery.     

从腹腔镜手术展望蓬勃发展的微创外科技术

以腔镜外科技术为代表的微创外科技术和器官移植、基因与生物医学工程共同组成21世纪医学发展的三大主流方向,而其中的腔镜外科技术,被誉为21世纪最耀眼的外科进展之一."外科手术的基础是暴露,切口越大暴露越充分"曾经是我们住院医师普遍接受的外科启蒙教育,深深地影响并伴随着一代外科医生的成长历程.1983年英国泌尿外科医师Wickham首先提出微小创伤外科(minimally invasive surgery,MIS)的概念,却直到1987年腹腔镜胆囊切除术(laparoscopic cholecystectomy,LC)广泛开展之后,微创外科的概念和意义才逐渐被真正认识.     

解剖学微创向功能学微创的转变

With the development of minimally invasive management,laparoscopic operation has become more and more prevalent.As a surgical procedure,a serial of events,such as psychological damage,fasting,bleeding,...     

微创外科近20年进展及未来发展趋势

腹腔镜微创外科经历了3个发展阶段，即从“要不要做？”到“如何规范做？”，再到“做什么？”。回首过去20年，微创手术已从最初的单纯胆囊切除拓展到胃肠、肝胆胰、减重代谢、疝与腹壁外科等领域，手术量和手术复杂度逐步提高。展望未来，微创外科将更多地结合疾病本身治疗的进步而发展，人工智能、虚拟现实、下一代移动通信传输、肿瘤靶向治疗等技术将助力微创外科的进一步创新。微创外科也将秉承“绿色”理念，实现可持续发展。     

Early experience with minimally invasive repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernias: results and lessons learned

Background:

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for the repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernias (CDH) had been described. This report reviews the authors’ experience with MIS repairs of CDH and discusses the technical development of this approach.

Methods:

From 1999 until now, the authors collected data on children who underwent an MIS approach for CDH repair.

Results:

Seventeen children (11 Morgagni and 7 Bochdalek) had undergone an attempt at MIS repair. All Morgagni defects were treated successfully using laparoscopy (mean age, 28 ± 31 months). Mean follow-up was 22 ± 9 months. There was 1 recurrence. Four children with Bochdalek CDH were treated as newborns (range, 3 to 21 days), and 3 had operations later (4, 11, and 32 months). The first repair was attempted initially transabdominally and was converted to a thoracoscopic approach. The rest of the Bochdalek repairs were performed thoracoscopically. Bochdalek repairs via MIS were successful in 3 children (2 older children and 1 neonate). No child had pulmonary hypertension. Two of the 3 Bochdalek patients did well postoperatively (follow-up, 18 +/− 7 months); the last patient experienced recurrence 11 months after repair.

Conclusions:

MIS for CDH is ideal for Morgagni defects. It should be considered for nonnewborns with a Bochdalek CDH. The MIS approach for a newborn with a CDH cannot be recommended because of the high failure rate and frequent rise in Pco₂ levels.     

Designing safety into the minimally invasive surgical revolution

Surgical errors with minimally invasive surgery differ from those in open surgery. Perforations are typically the result of trocar introduction or electrosurgery. Infections include bioburdens, notably enteric viruses, on complex instruments. Retained foreign objects are primarily unretrieved device fragments and lost gallstones or other specimens. Fires and burns come from illuminated ends of fiber-optic cables and from electrosurgery. Pressure ischemia is more likely with longer endoscopic surgical procedures. Gas emboli can occur. Minimally invasive surgery is more dependent on complex equipment, with high likelihood of failures. Standardization, checklists, and problem reporting are solutions for minimizing failures. The necessity of electrosurgery makes education about best electrosurgical practices important. The recording of minimally invasive surgical procedures is an opportunity to debrief in a way that improves the reliability of future procedures. Safety depends on reliability, designing systems to withstand inevitable human errors. Safe systems are characterized by a commitment to safety, formal protocols for communications, teamwork, standardization around best practice, and reporting of problems for improvement of the system. Teamwork requires shared goals, mental models, and situational awareness in order to facilitate mutual monitoring and backup. An effective team has a flat hierarchy; team members are empowered to speak up if they are concerned about problems. Effective teams plan, rehearse, distribute the workload, and debrief. Surgeons doing minimally invasive surgery have a unique opportunity to incorporate the principles of safety into the development of their discipline.     

Image-guided sinus surgery: lessons learned from the first 1000 cases.

OBJECTIVE: To study physician utilization and experience with image-guidance technology for sinus surgery. Study Design and Setting: Retrospective review of the first 1000 image-guided sinus operations performed by 42 surgeons at an academic medical center. RESULTS: Utilization of image-guidance systems showed a dramatic increase in both number of cases performed and surgeons who used this equipment (70.6% and 92.8%, respectively) during the first 2 years of its availability. Surgical volume subsequently decreased by a mean of 9.3% per year, whereas the number of surgeons using this technology plateaued. The majority of surgeons continued to perform image-guided surgery throughout the study period for selected cases. The knowledge base gained from this experience can best be summarized as a series of lessons learned. CONCLUSION: It is likely that the availability and utilization of image-guidance systems for sinus surgery will continue to increase in the future. Physicians who learn to use this new technology must do so with an appreciation for both its potential benefits and pitfalls.     

Fifty years of thoracic aortic surgery: lessons learned and future directions

During the past 50 years, the genetic basis and natural history of aortic disease has been defined. Surgical methods evolved to reduce mortality and morbidity from bleeding, renal impairment, cerebral injury, and paraplegia. Aortic surgery is now a specialty in itself. Experienced groups achieve a mortality rate of less than 2% for root operations and less than 15% for arch surgery and aortic dissection. The introduction of stent grafts has changed the approach to vascular pathology. These are less intimidating for the patient but have unsolved risks with uncertain long-term outcome. In the future, an evidence-based balance between conventional surgical procedures versus interventional strategies is required.     

质量赢未来:我国微创外科的发展路径

医疗质量始终是医疗技术得到发展的首要条件.要提高一项医疗技术乃至一个学科的水平和质量,首先需有正确的规范在质量控制上加以管理和约束以保障医疗质量;其次,需要有多中心协作、设计合理的临床研究以保障研究质量,为其进一步发展推广提供坚实可信的数据基础;再次,需要有完善的人才培养和培训体系以保障人才质量,为其发展提供源源不断的新生力量;最后,尚需有创新思维和理念,推动其在未来竞争中不断获得更高层次的发展.     

Port-access minimally invasive cardiac surgery increases surgical complexity, increases operating room time, and facilitates early postoperative hospital discharge

BACKGROUND: Proposed advantages of port-access cardiac surgery have yet to be substantiated. The authors retrospectively compared patients undergoing port-access cardiac surgery with a matched group undergoing conventional cardiac surgery. METHODS: Forty-six patients who underwent port-access cardiac surgery were matched with 46 who underwent conventional cardiac surgery. Absolute criteria for matching included morning-of-surgery admission, procedure undergone, and care being delivered by one of two surgeons. If possible, matching included care delivered by one of two anesthesiologists. Patients were matched as closely as possible for preoperative demographic and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: All 46 pairs of patients were matched for procedure and admitted the morning of surgery. All 92 operations were performed by one of two surgeons, and 89% were performed by one of two anesthesiologists. Preoperative demographic and clinical characteristics were equivalent between groups. Compared with conventional cardiac surgery, port-access cardiac surgery increased surgical complexity (it almost tripled cardiopulmonary bypass time during coronary artery bypass grafting and increased it almost 40% during mitral valve procedures) and increased total operating room time (P < 0.0001). Port-access cardiac surgery had no beneficial effect on earlier postoperative extubation, decreased incidence of atrial fibrillation, or intensive care unit time, yet it decreased postoperative duration of stay (P = 0.029, all patients), a benefit observed primarily in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective analysis revealed that port-access cardiac surgery increases surgical complexity, increases operating room time, has no effect on earlier postoperative extubation or decreased incidence of atrial fibrillation or intensive care unit time, and may facilitate postoperative hospital discharge (primarily in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting). Properly designed prospective investigation is necessary to ascertain whether port-access cardiac surgery truly offers any benefits over conventional cardiac surgery.