Prognostic tools to assess candidacy for and efficacy of antibody‐removal therapy

Currently, the ability to predict or monitor the efficacy of HLA antibody–removal therapies is deficient. We previously reported that titration studies are a consistent and accurate means of assessing antibody strength. To test whether titration studies can also predict which patients are better candidates for desensitization, we studied 38 patients from 3 centers (29 receiving plasmapheresis/low‐dose intravenous immunoglobulin [IVIg]; 9 patients receiving high‐dose IVIg). For patients undergoing plasmapheresis/low‐dose IVIg, antibody titer reduction correlated with number of treatment cycles for both class I and II antibodies but only up to approximately 4 cycles. Reduction in titer slowed with additional cycles, suggesting a limit to the efficacy of this approach. Furthermore, initial titer (predesensitization) can guide the selection of candidates for successful antibody‐removal treatment. In our experience, patients with antibodies at an initial titer >1:512 could not be reduced to the goal of a negative lymphocyte crossmatch, corresponding to a 1:16 titer, despite a significant increase in the number of treatment cycles. Change in mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) value did not correlate with success of treatment if initial MFI values were >10 000, likely due to single antigen bead saturation. Overall, we present a potential prognostic tool to predict candidacy and a monitoring tool to assess efficacy of desensitization treatment.     

Eculizumab Salvage Therapy for Antibody‐Mediated Rejection in a Desensitization‐Resistant Intestinal Re‐Transplant Patient

The presence of elevated calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA) and anti‐HLA donor specific antibodies (DSA) are high risk factors for acute antibody‐mediated rejection (AAMR) in intestinal transplantation that may lead to graft loss. Eculizumab has been used for the treatment of AAMR in kidney transplantation of sensitized patients that do not respond to other treatment. Here, we report a case where eculizumab was used to treat AAMR in a desensitization‐resistant intestinal re‐transplant patient. A male patient lost his intestinal graft to AAMR 8.14 years after his primary transplant. He received a second intestinal graft that had to be explanted a month later due to refractory AAMR. The patient remained highly sensitized despite multiple treatments. He received a multivisceral graft and presented with severe AAMR on day 3 posttransplantation. The AAMR was successfully treated with eculizumab. The patient presently maintains an elevated cPRA level above 90% but his DSAs have decreased from 18 000 MFI (mean fluorescent intensity) to below the positive cut‐off value of 3000 MFI and remains rejection free with a 2‐year follow‐up since his multivisceral transplant. Eculizumab offers an alternative to treat AAMR in intestinal transplantation in desensitization‐resistant patients.     

Estimating alloantibody levels in highly sensitized renal allograft candidates: Using serial dilutions to demonstrate a treatment effect in clinical trials

Small reductions in calculated panel-reactive antibody (cPRA) are associated with increased kidney transplantation in 100% cPRA patients. However, the high level of antibody in these patients is such that desensitization may reduce antibody but not cPRA, thus the cPRA change on undiluted serum with desensitization is an insensitive measure of effectiveness. We evaluated cPRA reduction, calculated per antibody titer, as a desensitization trial endpoint. To accomplish this, two serum samples from 20 kidney transplant candidates with cPRA ≥99.9% (100%) were obtained and serially diluted in triplicate to determine the titer of individual human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibody specificities. CPRA was computed per dilution to identify the titer at which cPRA drops below 98%. Inter- and intra-assay variability and changes overtime were determined. The dilution needed to reach a cPRA <98% was within 1 titer for replicates from the same sample, with 90% (36/40) concordance. This indicates that only changes >2 titers can be deemed clinically meaningful. The median (IQR) titer difference was 0 (0-1) from baseline to follow-up within 12 months. The cPRA per titer also risk-stratified candidates for trial inclusion. In conclusion, determining the cPRA per titer is a reliable approach to simplify complex antibody data and an ideal endpoint for desensitization trials.     

The impact of belatacept on third‐party HLA alloantibodies in highly sensitized kidney transplant recipients

Recent evidence suggests that belatacept reduces the durability of preexisting antibodies to class I and class II human leukocyte antigens (HLAs). In this case series of 163 highly sensitized kidney transplant candidates whose calculated panel‐reactive antibody (cPRA) activity was ≥98% to 100%, the impact of belatacept on preexisting HLA antibodies was assessed. Of the 163 candidates, 72 underwent transplantation between December 4, 2014 and April 15, 2017; 60 of these transplanted patients remained on belatacept consecutively for at least 6 months. We observed a decrease in the breadth and/or strength of HLA class I antibodies as assessed by FlowPRA in belatacept‐treated patients compared to controls who did not receive belatacept. Specifically, significant HLA antibody reduction was evident for class I (P < .0009). Posttransplant belatacept‐treated patients also had a clinically significant reduction in their cPRA compared to controls (P < .01). Collectively, these findings suggest belatacept can reduce HLA class I antibodies in a significant proportion of highly sensitized recipients and could be an option to improve pretransplant compatibility with organ donors.     

Antibodies to cryptic epitopes on HLA class I and class II heavy chains bound to single antigen beads: Clinically relevant?

Cell surface HLA class I consists of trimers, i.e., alpha - heavy chain, beta – 2 - microglobulin, and a peptide, termed closed conformers (CC) on non-activated lymphocytes. HLA class I and class II may also exist, respectively, as alpha-chain only or alpha and beta - chain only on activated cells termed open conformers (OC). We extend previous studies using an OC-specific monoclonal antibody that demonstrate LABScreen HLA class I and II single antigen beads (SABs) contain a mixture of open and closed conformers. LIFECODES SABs have bound CC only. More HLA class I and class II LABScreen SABs were reactive than LIFECODES SABs due to the presence of OC on LABScreen SABs. We hypothesized that antibody against OC on HLA B antigens would not be detected in cell based cross matches (XMs) with typical lymphocyte targets since anti-HLA OC antibodies would not react with native HLA CC on the cell surface. To test this hypothesis, we performed flow cytometry XM (FCXM) assays with sera of sufficient strength that most laboratories would likely predict positive FCXMs. Sera that reacted strongly with LABScreen SABs (>13,000 MFI) but weakly or not at all with LIFECODES SABs (<1000 MFI) gave negative T and B cell FCXMs. In contrast, sera that reacted with LIFECODES SABs (>13,000 MFI) but weakly with LABScreen SABs (<2100 MFI) exhibited positive FCXMs. Detection of antibodies directed against OC in SAB assays, may lead to inappropriate listing of unacceptable antigens, a decision not to XM or pre-or post – transplant desensitization procedures.     

Effects of different sensitization events on HLA alloimmunization in renal transplant cases; a retrospective observation in 1066 cases

BackgroundPatients awaiting solid organ transplantation may develop anti-HLA antibodies after sensitization events such as transfusions, pregnancies, or previous transplantations. However, the effects of a particular sensitization event on HLA alloimmunization have not been well studied in parallel using cell-based assays and solid-phase assays. In this study, we evaluated and compare how different sensitization events affect the HLA antibody screening (HLA-Ab) and donor specific antibody (DSA) status in solid renal organ transplantation patients.MethodsHLA antibody (HLA-Ab) screening tests like complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch (CDC-XM), flow cytometry crossmatch (FC-XM) and Luminex panel-reactive antibody (L-PRA) were performed in all 1066 patients (635 males and 431 females). If any of these tests turned out to be positive, a Luminex single antigen bead (L-SAB) assay was performed for DSA identification. Test positive rates and antibody strengths were analyzed according to the different sensitization events and gender.ResultsIn this study, HLA-Ab screening tests positive rates (L-PRA, FC-XM and CDC-XM) were significantly higher in patients with previous transplantation (73.91%, 100% and 56.52% p < 0.001), previous pregnancy (57.46%, 70.14% and 18.85% p < 0.001) or blood transfusion (27.33%, 35.55% and 7.33% p < 0.001) compared with patients without a sensitizing event (6.17%, 13.58% and 1.09). In this study, re-transplantation group showed significantly stronger antibody strength (DSA) than non sensitized group (class I and II MFI 11418.04, 17,837.78 vs class I and II MFI 2659, 3329; P < 0.001) and those with single sensitization events of transfusion (class I and II MFI 11418.04, 17,837.78 vs class I and II MFI 5790.26, 6004.16; P < 0.001) or pregnancy (class I & II MFI 11418, 17,837 vs class I and II MFI 8631.71, 7253.29; P < 0.001).ConclusionsPregnancy and blood transfused had high allo-immunization rate for class I HLA antigens. While re-transplantation patients had high allo-immunization rate for both the HLA classes (HLA- class I and HLA- class II). Re-transplantation group showed significantly stronger antibody strength, followed by pregnancy and then transfusion.     

Detection and analysis of HLA class I and class II specific alloantibodies in the sera of dialysis recipients waiting for a renal retransplantation

The objective of this study was to evaluate the specificities of HLA class I (-A,-B) and class II (-DR,-DQ) antibodies (Ab) detected in the sera of alloimmunized patients waiting for a subsequent renal transplantation. The study group consisted of 62 dialysis patients (42 men and 20 women, mean age: 43 +/- 18 yr) on waiting list for a subsequent kidney transplant (52 for a second and 10 for a third transplant) at S. Martino Hospital Transplant Centre in Genoa/Italy, who were enrolled from 2002 to 2004 for HLA antibody screening. Complement dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) technique was used firstly to select anti-HLA class I sensitized patients; indeed sera from 50 individuals out of 62 (80.6%) were found to display persistent HLA class I PRA (panel reactive antibody) values >4% (range: 20-100). ELISA technique was subsequently adopted to analyze HLA class I Ab positive sera for the presence also of HLA class II Ab and to characterize class I and class II Ab specificities. Anti-class I immunized patients were divided in three groups according to the type of class I Ab specificities, that were classified as private, public, and multispecific. The first group included 35 patients (70% of the total number of positive patients) showing only antibodies directed against private HLA class I specificities, represented in 33 cases by those expressed by graft donors (first or second transplant). In this group anti-class I PRA% values ranged from 20% to 60%. HLA class II Ab, with an heterogeneous specificity pattern (private, public or multispecific), were present in 25 (78.1%) out of the 32 patients, whose sera were also available for this analysis. The second group comprised 12 patients (24%) who displayed antibodies directed against class I public epitopes belonging to CREGs (Cross reactive Groups) or an association of anti-private and anti-public antibodies. In this group PRA values ranged from 25% to 90%. Five patients (46.7%) were positive for HLA class II Ab, whose specificity pattern appeared also heterogeneous (private or multispecific). The third group was represented by three patients (6%) displaying multispecific antibodies with PRA values > or = 90%. No multispecific class II Ab were found in this group, where only two patients had class II Ab showing anti-private or anti-private plus public specificities. Globally, 74% of anti-class I Ab positive patients, having at least one HLA class II antigen mismatch, appeared also positive for class II Ab. These results indicate that: (i) a large proportion of patients, waiting for a kidney retransplantation, display in their sera alloantibodies specific for graft mismatched HLA class I (80.6%) and class II antigens (54.2); (ii) the immunogenic determinants, mainly involved in HLA class I and II specific Ab production, were, in a significant rate, private specificities of mismatched HLA antigens (70% for class I and 59.4% for class II), and in a lesser percentage by public (CREG) epitopes (24% for class I and 34.3% for class II). In a few patients only no HLA class I and class II Ab specificities could be determined, as they displayed multispecific antibodies (6% for class I and 6.2% for class II). These findings may have important implications to improve donor-recipient matching in dialysis recipients waiting for a subsequent renal transplantation.     

The correlation of results of panel reactive antibody,identification, and single antigen beads in detection of anti-HLA antibodies: Istanbul Faculty of Medicine,tissue typing laboratory experience

BackgroundWe have performed a retrospective analysis of anti-HLA class I MHC and class II MHC antibodies measured using a single antigen bead (SAB) assay and a panel reactive antibody (PRA) assay.Material and methodsA group of 256 patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) was tested for anti-HLA antibodies in the tissue typing laboratory between 2017 and 2020. In the cohort, the serum samples of patients waiting for transplantation were tested. Both the PRA and SAB tests of these patients were analyzed using the Luminex (Immucor) method. The threshold of positivity was accepted as median fluorescence intensities (MFI) ≥1000 for PRA screening and MFI ≥750 for SAB screening.ResultsOverall, antibodies to HLA antigens were detected in 202 (78.9%) out of 256 patients in the PRA study. Antibodies against both class I/II antigens were detected only in 15.6% of these patients, whereas antibodies against only against class I HLA in 31.3% and only against class II HLA in 32.0%. By comparison, the SAB study found that 66.8% of patients were positive for HLA antigens. Furthermore, donor-specific antibodies (DSA) were detected in 52.0% of PRA-positive patients and 52.6% of SAB-positive patients. It was shown that 168 patients (83.2%) out of 202 PRA-positive patients were found to be SAB-positive. In addition, 51 patients negative in the SAB assay (94.4%) were also negative in the PRA assay. Statistical analysis established a significant correlation between the PRA and SAB positivity (p > 0.001).It was also shown that MFI ≥3000 PRA positivity for class I HLA antigens (p = 0.049) and MFI ≥5000 PRA positivity for class II antigens (p < 0.001) correlated with the SAB positivity in patients.ConclusionOur results showed the importance of both PRA and SAB assays to define the status of sensitization in patients.     

Anti-HLA Antibodies After Precocious Transplantectomy by Vascular Thrombosis

Background

Our objective in this study was to determine the effects of early renal transplantectomy on patients and the production of anti–human leukocyte antigen (anti-HLA) antibodies.

Living donor kidney transplantation in crossmatch-positive patients enabled by peritransplant immunoadsorption and anti-CD20 therapy

Living donor kidney transplantation in crossmatch-positive patients is a challenge that requires specific measures. Ten patients with positive crossmatch results (n = 9) or negative crossmatch results but strong donor-specific antibodies (DSA; n = 1) were desensitized using immunoadsorption (IA) and anti-CD20 antibody induction. IA was continued after transplantation and accompanied by HLA antibody monitoring and protocol biopsies. After a median of 10 IA treatments, all patients were desensitized successfully and transplanted. Median levels of mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of Luminex-DSA before desensitization were 6203 and decreased after desensitization and immediately before transplantation to 891. Patients received a median of seven post-transplant IA treatments. At last visit, after a median follow-up of 19 months, 9 of 10 patients had a functioning allograft and a median Luminex-DSA of 149 MFI; serum creatinine was 1.6 mg/dl, and protein to creatinine ratio 0.1. Reversible acute antibody-mediated rejection was diagnosed in three patients. One allograft was lost after the second post-transplant year in a patient with catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome. We describe a treatment algorithm for desensitization of living donor kidney transplant recipients that allows the rapid elimination of DSA with a low rate of side effects and results in good graft outcome.     

Detection of anti-HLA antibodies with flow cytometry in needle core biopsies of renal transplants recipients with chronic allograft nephropathy

The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of detecting anti-HLA antibodies in eluates from needle core biopsies of renal transplants with chronic allograft nephropathy. Two methods of screening, the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and flow cytometry (FlowPRA) were compared. Twenty renal transplants with CAN were removed after irreversible graft failure. To assess the feasibility of detecting anti-HLA antibodies in small samples, needle core biopsies were sampled at the same place as surgical samples and at a second cortical area. Antibodies were eluted with an acid elution kit and anti-class I and class II IgG HLA antibodies detected using ELISA and flow cytometry. Flow cytometry was found to be more sensitive than ELISA for detecting anti-HLA antibodies in eluates from renal transplants with CAN (95% vs. 75% of positive cases). Detection of anti-HLA antibodies showed good agreement between surgical samples and needle core biopsies performed at the same place for anti-class I (80% vs. 65%, r=0.724 P<0.01) and anti-class II HLA antibodies (70% vs. 55%, r=0.827 P<0.01). In addition, differences in the detection of anti-class I HLA antibodies in needle core biopsies sampled at different sites suggests that immunization to class I donor antigen could be underestimated in needle core biopsy samples. These data indicate that anti-HLA antibodies can be detected in needle core biopsies from renal transplants. Provided further evaluation is done, elution might be a complementary method to detect anti-HLA antibodies when they are bound to the transplant.     

Clinical impact of the baseline donor‐specific anti‐human leukocyte antigen antibody measured by Luminex single antigen assay in living donor kidney transplant recipients after desensitization therapy

The aim of this study is to investigate the clinical impact of donor‐specific anti‐HLA‐antibody (HLA‐DSA) baseline levels, measured using the Luminex single antigen assay (LSA), in living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT). Total 129 cases of LDKT were divided into four groups according to baseline mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) HLA‐DSA values: Strong (n = 6), >10 000; Moderate (n = 8), 5 000–10 000; Weak (n = 11), 1 000–5 000, Negative (n = 104), <1 000. Pretransplant desensitization (DSZ) was performed to decrease the MFI to weak or negative values before KT. Clinical outcomes in the four groups were compared. After DSZ, HLA‐DSA decreased to weak or negative levels in all patients; Acute rejections developed more frequently in strong group [5/6 (83.3%)] compared with other three groups (P < 0.05), and especially acute antibody‐mediated rejection (AAMR) developed almost exclusively in strong group [4/6 (66.7%)]. Strong HLA‐DSA levels at baseline were more predictive of AAMR than either type of XM (complement‐dependent lymphocytotoxicity or flow cytometry) in ROC analysis. Allograft function in this group showed significant deterioration during follow‐up compared with the other groups. In conclusion, strong HLA‐DSA levels at baseline are associated with worse allograft outcome even after successful desensitization; therefore, strict monitoring and strong maintenance immunosuppression may be required in such patients.     

Urgent desensitization in patients bridged to heart transplantation under extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support: A preliminary experience

Antihuman leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies restrict the access to cardiac allografts. Desensitization therapy is a major challenge in patients with cardiogenic shock waiting for urgent heart transplantation (HT). We retrospectively reviewed six patients (mean age of 37.5 years [16–70]) who underwent plasmapheresis (PP) under extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) before transplant between January 2017 and September 2018. The average duration of follow‐up was 25 months [20–32]. Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of HLA‐specific antibodies was reported as follows: score 4 for MFI < 1000, score 6 for 1000 < MFI < 3000 and score 8 for MFI > 3000. The mean duration of ECMO support was 29 days [1–74] and 6.8 [1–29] PP sessions were performed per patient before transplant. The mean number of HLA‐specific antibodies before HT was 9.6 for score 6 [4–13] and 5.8 for score 8 [1–12]. Four patients had major complications after transplantation (2 hemorrhagic shocks, 5 infectious events). Mean MFI reduction rate was 94% [79–100] for Class I and 44.2% for Class II [0–83]. Hospital survival was 100%, and early antibody‐mediated rejection was diagnosed in one patient at 7 days after HT. Plasmapheresis under ECMO support was associated with favorable early outcomes in highly sensitized candidates for urgent heart transplantation.     

Comparative analysis of two methods to detect donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies after kidney transplant

Preformed anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies may be present in the blood of kidney transplant candidates. The production of these antibodies may occur in the post-transplant period, with the possible development of donor-specific antibodies (DSA). Luminex-based tests, such as the single antigen (SA) assay and the Luminex crossmatch (Xm-DSA) assay are the most commonly used tools to detect anti-HLA antibodies, due to their high sensitivity and specificity. This cross-sectional study aimed to compare the findings of two methods for the detection of DSAs after kidney transplant: SA and Xm-DSA. A total of 122 patients who underwent deceased donor kidney transplant at Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre were included. The SA assay detected anti-class I HLA DSAs in 17 patients (13.9%) and anti-class II HLA DSAs in 22 patients (19.6%), whereas the Xm-DSA detected DSAs in 18 patients (14.8%) both against class I and class II antigens. There was agreement between the two methods for class I (kappa = 0.66, p = 0.001) and class II (kappa = 0.54, p = 0.025) antigens. The incidence of DSAs as obtained by the SA assay was 15.57%, and the most prevalent DSAs were those against HLA-DR antigens. Patient survival at 3 years was 92%. The two techniques assessed in this study provide important information on the presence of DSAs and may help in the post-transplant patient monitoring and in immunosuppressive strategy.     

Sensitization Following LVAD Implantation Using Leucodepleted Blood Is Not Due to HLA Antibodies

Implantation of left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) is associated with HLA antibody sensitization. The objective of this study was to determine the specificity of antibodies produced by LVAD recipients using a combination of ELISA, Luminex and microcytotoxicity assays. Fifty-one LVAD patients were studied, from 44 to 838 days post-implantation. No patient developed HLA antibodies, although 24 produced IgG antibodies detectable in both ELISA and Luminex assays. These antibodies manifest as positive reactions with class I and class II wells of the ELISA and also blank wells. In Luminex assays, they produce high MFI readings with the negative control beads. Antibodies were detected 18 to 228 days after implantation. This reactivity was found to be directed against bovine serum albumin (BSA), commonly used to block non-specific binding in ELISA and Luminex assays; absorption of sera with BSA-coated beads completely abrogated reactivity in all solid phase assays, but did not eliminate anti-HLA antibodies in control sera. Ten of the 24 patients have proceeded to transplantation, with a 1-year graft survival of 69%. In conclusion, it appears that implantation of LVADS disrupts immunoregulatory pathways leading to production of anti-albumin antibodies. These can be misinterpreted as anti-HLA antibodies in solid phase assays.     

Development of ELISA-detected anti-HLA antibodies precedes the development of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome and correlates with progressive decline in pulmonary function after lung transplantation

BACKGROUND: Development of anti-HLA antibodies after lung transplantation (LT) is thought to play an important role in the etiology of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS). However, a cause-effect relationship between anti-HLA antibodies and BOS has not been established. This study was conducted to determine the temporal relationship between the development of anti-HLA antibodies and BOS after LT, and to determine the antigenic specificity of the antibodies developed in BOS patients. METHODS: Sera from 15 BOS+ LT patients and 12 BOS- LT patients were obtained before LT and collected again at 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 months after LT. Anti-HLA antibodies were detected by the PRA-STAT ELISA system and by complement-dependent cytotoxicity assays. Anti-HLA reactivity was further characterized by flow cytometry and absorption/elution with human platelets. RESULTS: When analyzed by ELISA, 10 of 15 BOS+ patients developed anti-HLA antibodies, whereas 0 of 12 BOS- patients developed anti-HLA antibodies (P<0.001). When analyzed by complement-dependent cytotoxicity, only 2 of 15 BOS+ patients developed anti-HLA antibodies and 1 of 12 BOS- patients developed anti-HLA antibodies (P = 0.99). There was a significant difference of 20.1 months between the time of anti-HLA antibody detection and the time of BOS diagnosis (P = 0.005). A progressive decrease in pulmonary function correlated with a progressive increase in the anti-HLA reactivity 36 months after LT. The anti-HLA reactivity was directed to one of the donor HLA class I antigens and to other unrelated HLA class I antigens. No anti-HLA reactivity was found against HLA class II molecules. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that anti-HLA class I antibodies play an important role in the pathogenesis of BOS and that monitoring of anti-HLA class I antibody development by a highly sensitive assay such as the PRA-STAT ELISA after LT can provide an early identification of an important subset of LT patients with an increased risk of developing BOS.     

Harnessing Scientific and Technological Advances to Improve Equity in Kidney Allocation Policies

We reported that current assignment of HLA‐DQ is a barrier to organ allocation. Here we simulated the impact of incorporating HLA‐DQ antigens and antibodies as A/B and αβ allelic variants, respectively, on calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA) and probability of finding potential compatible donors (PCD). A cohort of 1224 donors and 2075 sensitized candidates was analyzed using HLA‐DQαβ allelic (study) versus serologic (current practice) nomenclature. A significant (p < 10^?4) decrease in cPRA was observed with higher impact for male versus female, and first transplant versus retransplant (p < 10^?4), affecting mostly patients with moderate cPRA (30–80%). Consequently, the number of patients qualifying for 100% cPRA points according to the United Network for Organ Sharing–Kidney Allocation System decreased by 37%. More critically, by using allelic versus serologic nomenclature for HLA‐DQ, the number of PCDs for all patients was increased, with male and first‐transplant patients showing a higher expansion compared with female and retransplants. Patients of blood group O showed the highest benefit. The goal of reporting unacceptable antigens is to improve accuracy of virtual crossmatching and increase the likelihood of finding immunologically compatible donors. Our simulation provides strong support for the need to re‐evaluate the use of allele typing and how HLA‐DQ antigens and antibodies are incorporated into allocation policies to ensure equity.     

Donor Specificity but Not Broadness of Sensitization Is Associated With Antibody‐Mediated Rejection and Graft Loss in Renal Allograft Recipients

Panel‐reactive antibodies are widely regarded as an important immunological risk factor for rejection and graft loss. The broadness of sensitization against HLA is most appropriately measured by the “calculated population‐reactive antibodies” (cPRA) value. In this study, we investigated whether cPRA represent an immunological risk in times of sensitive and accurate determination of pretransplantation donor‐specific HLA antibodies (DSA). Five hundred twenty‐seven consecutive transplantations were divided into four groups: cPRA 0% (n = 250), cPRA 1–50% (n = 129), cPRA 51–100% (n = 43), and DSA (n = 105). Patients without DSA were considered as normal risk and received standard immunosuppression without T cell–depleting induction. Patients with DSA received an enhanced induction therapy and maintenance immunosuppression. Surveillance biopsies were performed at 3 and 6 months. Median follow‐up was 5.7 years. Among the three cPRA groups, there were no differences regarding the 1‐year incidence of ABMR (p = 0.16) and TCMR (p = 0.75). The 5‐year allograft survival rates were similar and around 87% (p = 0.28). The estimated glomerular filtration rate at last follow‐up was 50–53 mL/min (p = 0.45). On multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis, the strongest independent predictor for ABMR and (death‐censored) graft survival was pretransplantation DSA. cPRA were not predictive for ABMR, TCMR, or (death‐censored) graft survival. We conclude that with current DSA assignment, the broadness of sensitization measured by cPRA does not imply an immunological risk.     

The effectiveness of the combination of rituximab and high‐dose immunoglobulin in the immunomodulation of sensitized kidney transplant candidates

Kidney transplantation faces many challenges not the least of which is the presence of pre‐formed HLA antibodies. At our institution, we have used a combination of methods to immunomodulate sensitized patients. Most recently, this has been attempted with a combination of immunoglobulin (IVIG) and rituximab (Rituxan; Genetech, CA, USA). A total of 31 patients were followed for up to one yr following treatment with IVIG (2 gm/kg on day 1 and day 30) and rituximab (1 g – day 15). Antibody levels were followed serially at designated time points via solid‐phase single‐antigen beads (SAB) method (One Lambda, Inc., Canoga Park, CA, USA). Concentration of antibodies was based on median fluorescence intensity (MFI). The majority of patients had both class I and class II antibodies (79%). Our results showed that this protocol appeared to be patient and antibody specific. The most pronounced MFI reduction in antibodies occurred within the 30‐ to 100‐d period post‐treatment. Calculated panel‐reactive antibodies decreased but rebound tended to occur by 104 d after antibody MFI nadir. Because of this rebound, it can be inferred that the patients did not show a durable increase in their potential for transplantation. The search for a more effective method to immunomodulate patients continues.