Low thoracic and lumbar burst fractures: radiographic and functional outcomes

Twenty patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures (type A3 in the classification of Magerl et al.) were studied prospectively for the evaluation of clinical, radiographic and functional results. The patients were submitted to surgical treatment by posterior arthrodesis, posterior fixation and autologous transpedicular graft. The patients were followed up for 2 years after surgery and assessed on the basis of clinical (pain, neurologic deficit, postoperative infection), radiographic (load sharing classification, Farcy s sagittal index of the fractured segment, relation between traumatic vertebral body height and the adjacent vertebrae (compression percentage), height of the intervertebral disk proximal and distal to the fractured vertebra, rupture or loosening of the implants) and functional (return to work, SF-36) criteria. Two patients presented a marked loss of correction and required the placement of an anterior support graft. Pain assessment revealed that eight patients (44%) had no pain; four (22%) had occasional pain, three (17%) moderate pain, and three (17%) severe pain. According to the classification of Frankel et al., 17 patients persisted as Frankel E and one patient presented improvement of one degree, becoming Frankel D. The mean value of Farcy s sagittal index of the injured vertebral segment was 20.67 degrees +/- 6.15 degrees (range 8 degrees -32 degrees ) during the preoperative period, 11.22 degrees +/- 8.09 degrees (range -5 degrees to 21 degrees ) during the immediate postoperative period, and 14.22 degrees +/- 7.37 degrees (range 3 degrees -25 degrees ) at late evaluation. There was a statistically significant difference between the immediate postoperative values and the preoperative and late postoperative values. The compression percentage of the fractured vertebral body ranged from 9.1 to 60 (mean 28.81 +/- 11.51) during the preoperative period, from 0 to 60 (mean: 15.59 +/- 14.49) during the immediate postoperative period, and from 8 to 60 (mean: 25.9 +/- 13.02) at late evaluation. There was a statistically significant difference between the preoperative and postoperative values and between the postoperative and late postoperative values. The height of the proximal intervertebral disk ranged from 6 to 14 mm (mean 8.44 +/- 2.66) during the preoperative period, from 6 to 15 mm (mean 10 +/- 2.30) during the immediate postoperative period, and from 0 to 11 mm (mean 7.22 +/- 2.55) during the late postoperative period. A significant difference was observed between the immediate postoperative values and the preoperative and late postoperative values. The height of the intervertebral disk distal to the fractured vertebra ranged from 7 to 16 mm (mean 9.94 +/- 2.64) during the preoperative period, from 5 to 18 mm (mean 11.61 +/- 3.29) during the immediate postoperative period, and from 2 to 14 mm (mean 9.72 +/- 3.17) during the late postoperative period. There was a significant difference between the immediate postoperative values and the preoperative and late postoperative values. Except for the height of the intervertebral disk proximal to the fractured vertebra, no correlation was detected between the clinical, functional and radiologic results. The results observed in the present study indicate that other, still incompletely defined parameters influence the functional result of thoracolumbar burst fractures.     

Low lumbar burst fractures: comparison between conservative and surgical treatments.

Twenty-two low lumbar burst fractures (L3-L5) were treated, with an average follow up of 56.2 and 39.0 months in the conservative and surgically treated groups, respectively. Twenty patients were available for review; seven were treated conservatively and 13 were stabilized surgically. All patients were evaluated clinically for work status, activity level, residual pain, and subsequent development of neurologic symptoms. Roentgenograms were reviewed for severity of initial fracture, canal compromise, and maintenance of initial correction. In general, neurologically intact patients in both groups returned to similar postinjury employment levels. Persistent back pain was found to be more disabling in the surgically treated group, in which a fusion incorporating four or five lumbar segments was performed. There was no evidence of significant loss of initial reduction, and no patients experienced late neurological compromise in the surgical group. An average follow-up kyphosis of 9.2 degrees and 31% loss of vertebral height were observed in the conservative group, while a follow-up lordosis of 1 degree and 19% loss of vertebral height were observed in the surgical group. Conservative treatment of low lumbar burst fracture is a viable option in neurologically intact patients, but loss of lordosis and vertebral height may persist. Biomechanical and anatomic characteristics of the low lumbar spine differ from the thoracolumbar region and may account for the inherent stability of these injuries. If surgery is chosen, a long fusion with distraction instrumentation should be avoided in the low lumbar spine. A short rigid fixation with pedicular instrumentation may be of greater benefit.     

Complication avoidance: thoracolumbar and lumbar burst fractures

Most thoracolumbar and lumbar burst fractures can be treated conservatively. Unstable fractures or fractures resulting in neurologic deficits usually require surgical treatment. Choosing an appropriate surgical approach requires a thorough understanding of the various techniques for decompression, fusion, and stabilization. Surgical options include an anterior approach, a posterior approach, or a combined anteroposterior approach. Each surgical option has unique advantages and disadvantages. Generally, the anterior approaches are best used at the thoracolumbar junction, posterior approaches are ideal for low lumbar injuries and lumbar injuries that result in complete spinal cord injuries,and anteroposterior surgeries typically are reserved for highly unstable fracture subluxations. Case illustrations show the various treatment options.     

Importance of greenstick lamina fractures in low lumbar burst fractures

Lumbar burst fractures (L3-L5) represent a small percentage of all spinal fractures. The treatment of fractures involving the lumbar spine has been controversial. Lamina fractures may be complete or of the greenstick type. Dural tears and nerve root entrapment may accompany these lamina fractures. The aim of this retrospective study was to determine the incidence of dural tear in patients who had lumbar burst fractures with greenstick lamina fractures and the importance of these lamina fractures when choosing the optimum treatment. Twenty-six patients with 28 lumbar burst fractures were treated from 1995 through 2002. The average follow-up was 60 months (range 32-110 months). The male to female ratio was 21:5 and the mean age was 37 years (17-64). Dural tear was detected in seven (25%) out of 28 burst fractures. The functional outcome of the entire study group was assessed using the Smiley-Webster Scale. Good to excellent results were obtained in 24 (92%) of 26 patients. Lumbar burst fractures with greenstick lamina fractures occur mostly in the L2-L4 area. In the surgical treatment, any reduction manoeuvre will close the fracture and crush the entrapped neural elements. Therefore, it may be better to explore the greenstick lamina fracture whether there is any neural entrapment or not, before any reduction manoeuvre is attempted.     

Dural tears in lumbar burst fractures with greenstick lamina fractures

STUDY DESIGN: This study investigated the incidence, predictions, and treatment principles of greenstick lamina fractures in lumbar burst fractures. OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of dural tears in lumbar burst fracture with greenstick lamina fracture and to find out if any specific clinical and radiographic factors or intraoperative pathologic findings are predictive of dural tears and nerve root entrapment. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: A retrospective review was conducted on 45 patients with 47 lumbar burst fractures treated operatively. Ages ranged from 15 to 70 years (average, 33 years). The duration of follow-up ranged from 32 months to 8 years (average, 52 months). METHODS: All clinical charts and radiologic data of these patients were reviewed. Age, sex, etiology, and all the radiologic parameters were analyzed for their association with greenstick lamina fracture and dural tear. Student's t test and multiple logistic regression analysis were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Greenstick lamina fracture occurred in 20 (42.5%) of 47 burst fractures. Dural tear was detected in 9 (19%) of 47 burst fractures and was predominantly higher in L3 (6 of 9 burst fractures). According to multiple logistic regression analysis of the data, a 20% increase in the interpedicular distance gives a 79% probability of greenstick lamina fracture. The distance between the edges of greenstick lamina fractures was obviously higher in fractures with dural tear. Neurologic status was completely normal before surgery in three of the patients with dural tear and nerve root entrapment. CONCLUSIONS: It is not possible to detect dural tear and nerve root entrapment in greenstick lamina fracture before surgery. Therefore, if there is any suspicion of such an occurrence, it should be the rule to begin with posterior approach and use the open book technique to expose the dura safely before any reduction maneuver.     

Low lumbar spinal fractures: management options

Fifty-four patients with low lumbar spinal fractures were retrospectively reviewed. Of these, there were 25 compression fractures, 21 burst fractures, three flexion-distraction fractures and five fracture-dislocations. Three patients had a complete neurological lesion, 17 sustained an incomplete neurological injury, and 34 were neurologically intact. Twenty-six patients were treated non-operatively and 28 underwent surgery. All patients were followed up for l-12 years. Forty-three patients (79.6%) have returned to their former employment or activity level. Four patients had experienced significant improvement but suffered from some limitation of activity. Five patients were unable to stand up and walk without support although they had some degree of improvement. Two remained completely paralyzed. There were no differences in neurologic function between patients treated non-operatively or operatively (P>0.05). The patients treated operatively had significantly less pain compared to the patients treated non-operatively (P<0.01). Because of the unique anatomy and biomechanics, fractures of the low lumbar spine are different from those in the remaining regions of spine. Most compression fractures are stable, and therefore conservative management is indicated. Surgery should be performed in those with burst fractures or flexion-distraction fractures, with severe spinal stenosis or kyphotic deformity, and fracture-dislocation.     

Sexual dysfunction in men with paraparesis in lumbar burst fractures

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective follow-up study. OBJECTIVES: To review and analyze the sexual function of patients who have sustained lumbar fractures with incomplete paraparesis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: As a result of advances in surgical techniques, most patients with lumbar fractures have significant recovery of neurologic status. Because motor functions are important to patients, most of the studies have concentrated their analyses on motor recovery. Many patients who have almost completely recovered motor function, however, may have sexual dysfunction, especially men. METHODS: Forty-three patients with lumbar fractures that resulted in incomplete paraparesis were analyzed. American Spinal Injury Association motor index points were determined for each patient before and after surgery and used for comparison between American Spinal Injury Association motor index and international index of erectile function score. Eleven male patients who reported sexual dysfunction were evaluated by using Rigiscan. RESULTS: During the follow-up period, 42 patients showed neurologic recovery. Average improvement of American Spinal Injury Association motor score was 13. 1 and average international index of erectile function score was 45. Average improvement of American Spinal Injury Association motor score for patients who had not reported sexual dysfunction was 12.5, and average international index of erectile function score was 52. For 11 patients in the sexual dysfunction group, preoperative motor score was 28.0, and average improvement of score was 14.9. Nocturnal penile tumescence monitoring results were abnormal in four cases. Averaged international index of erectile function score was 15. There was a statistically significant difference between the sexually healthy and dysfunctional groups in international index of erectile function score (P < 0.05), whereas no difference was noted in American Spinal Injury Association motor score. CONCLUSIONS: Neurologic recovery after lumbar fractures was improved. Regardless of neurologic recovery, most patients reported some disability, usually caused by pain and occasionally sexual dysfunction. Impairment of sexual function was present in four patients (9.3%). Although these patients may preserve psychiatric erection potential, they usually experienced sexual problems.     

Decision-making in burst fractures of the thoracolumbar and lumbar spine

The most common site of injury to the spine is the thoracolumbar junction which is the mechanical transition junction between the rigid thoracic and the more flexible lumbar spine. The lumbar spine is another site which is more prone to injury. Absence of stabilizing articulations with the ribs, lordotic posture and more sagitally oriented facet joints are the most obvious explanations. Burst fractures of the spine account for 14% of all spinal injuries. Though common, thoracolumbar and lumbar burst fractures present a number of important treatment challenges. There has been substantial controversy related to the indications for nonoperative or operative management of these fractures. Disagreement also exists regarding the choice of the surgical approach. A large number of thoracolumbar and lumbar fractures can be treated conservatively while some fractures require surgery. Selecting an appropriate surgical option requires an in-depth understanding of the different methods of decompression, stabilization and/or fusion. Anterior surgery has the advantage of the greatest degree of canal decompression and offers the benefit of limiting the number of motion segments fused. These advantages come at the added cost of increased time for the surgery and the related morbidity of the surgical approach. Posterior surgery enjoys the advantage of being more familiar to the operating surgeons and can be an effective approach. However, the limitations of this approach include inadequate decompression, recurrence of the deformity and implant failure. Though many of the principles are the same, the treatment of low lumbar burst fractures requires some additional consideration due to the difficulty of approaching this region anteriorly. Avoiding complications of these surgeries are another important aspect and can be achieved by following an algorithmic approach to patient assessment, proper radiological examination and precision in decision-making regarding management. A detailed understanding of the mechanism of injury and their unique biomechanical propensities following various forms of treatment can help the spinal surgeon manage such patients effectively and prevent devastating complications.     

Ilizarov external fixator for burst fracture of the lumbar spine: a case report

A 50-year-old man presented with severe back pain and tenderness throughout the lumbar area after falling from a ladder. He had an unstable type-B burst fracture, with a spinal canal narrowing of 36% and an anterior height loss of 65%. His lower-limb neurological function was intact. An Ilizarov external spinal fixator was used; the pedicular half pins were inserted into the bilateral T11, T12, L2, and L3 pedicles; bilateral pedicular half pins were fixed at each level with external plates and rods. Postoperatively, the patient had a lordosis of 2 degrees and was able to walk 7 days later. The external fixator was removed at 10 weeks. Six years and 10 months after surgery, the patient had a kyphosis of 19 degrees that did not affect his activities of daily living.     

Neurological deficit and canal compromise in thoracolumbar and lumbar burst fractures

PURPOSE: To assess whether canal compromise determines neurological deficit in thoracolumbar and lumbar burst fractures. METHODS: 105 patients aged 17 to 60 (mean, 34) years who had burst fractures in the thoracolumbar (n=82) and lumbar (n=23) regions were included. Fractures were classified according to the Denis classification. The extent of spinal canal compromise was assessed by computed tomography, and the neurological status according to the modified Frankel grading for traumatic paraplegia. RESULTS: 19 (18%) of the patients had no neurological deficit. Of the remaining 86 (82%) with a deficit, 26 had complete paraplegia. The correlation between the type of the burst fracture and the severity of neurological deficit was not significant (Chi squared=10.57, p=0.835). The mean extent of spinal canal compromise in patients with deficits was 50%, whereas in patients with no deficit it was 36%. The difference between the extent of canal compromise and the severity of neurological deficit at the thoracolumbar and lumbar spine was not significant (p=0.08). Further subanalysis revealed a significant correlation at T11 and T12 (p=0.007) but not at the L1 (p=0.42) level. CONCLUSION: When studying neurological deficit, T11 and T12 injuries should be analysed separately from L1 injuries.     

Short segment pedicle screw instrumentation and augmentation vertebroplasty in lumbar burst fractures: an experience

To assess the efficacy and feasibility of vertebroplasty and posterior short-segment pedicle screw fixation for the treatment of traumatic lumbar burst fractures. Short-segment pedicle screw instrumentation is a well described technique to reduce and stabilize thoracic and lumbar spine fractures. It is relatively a easy procedure but can only indirectly reduce a fractured vertebral body, and the means of augmenting the anterior column are limited. Hardware failure and a loss of reduction are recognized complications caused by insufficient anterior column support. Patients with traumatic lumbar burst fractures without neurologic deficits were included. After a short segment posterior reduction and fixation, bilateral transpedicular reduction of the endplate was performed using a balloon, and polymethyl methacrylate cement was injected. Pre-operative and post-operative central and anterior heights were assessed with radiographs and MRI. Sixteen patients underwent this procedure, and a substantial reduction of the endplates could be achieved with the technique. All patients recovered uneventfully, and the neurologic examination revealed no deficits. The post-operative radiographs and magnetic resonance images demonstrated a good fracture reduction and filling of the bone defect without unwarranted bone displacement. The central and anterior height of the vertebral body could be restored to 72 and 82% of the estimated intact height, respectively. Complications were cement leakage in three cases without clinical implications and one superficial wound infection. Posterior short-segment pedicle fixation in conjunction with balloon vertebroplasty seems to be a feasible option in the management of lumbar burst fractures, thereby addressing all the three columns through a single approach. Although cement leakage occurred but had no clinical consequences or neurological deficit.     

原位弯棒复位治疗下腰椎爆裂性骨折

目的：评价后路原位弯棒复位治疗下腰椎爆裂性骨折的临床效果。方法：对2007年3月至2009年6月采用后路原位弯棒复位、经椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗的21例下腰椎爆裂性骨折进行回顾性分析,其中男16例,女5例;年龄25～59岁,平均37.9岁。损伤节段：L311例,L46例,L54例。神经功能损伤按ASIA分级：A级2例,B级2例,C级10例,D级4例,E级3例。术后观察影像学指标（伤椎前高残余量百分比、矢状位指数、椎管占位率）及神经功能的变化。结果：21例均获随访,时间12～39个月,平均16.5个月。术后影像显示：伤椎（椎体）前高残余百分比由术前平均57.9%恢复至94.1%（P〈0.01）,伤段矢状位指数由术前平均29.1°恢复至0.24°（P〈0.01）,椎管占位率由术前平均49.6%恢复至13.4%（P〈0.01）。神经功能也较术前有所改善（A级2例,B级0例,C级0例,D级4例,E级15例）。结论：下腰椎爆裂性骨折采用原位弯棒复位经椎弓根内固定可以实现三柱在三维上的同时复位,达到满意的复位效果,重建矢状位的平衡稳定。     

手术治疗新型冠状病毒感染合并腰椎爆裂性骨折一例报道

患者资料男性患者,52岁,因"摔伤致腰背部疼痛并双下肢不全瘫3 h"入院。患者自诉于2020年1月24日约上午8时外出时不慎滑倒摔伤,腰背部着地,当时自感腰背部疼痛剧烈,双下肢无力,略感麻木,不能自行站立,无意识障碍、发热、咳嗽咳痰、呼吸困难及恶心呕吐等不适。既往史:既往有"十二指肠溃疡"病史多年,其余既往史无特殊。个人史:否认近期华南海鲜市场暴露史,否认发热患者接触史,近期曾有未严格佩戴防护口罩外出购物史。体格检查:神志清楚,查体合作,体温36.5℃、心率100次/min、呼吸22次/min、血压138/90 mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa)。全身皮肤黏膜未见黄染,浅表淋巴结未扪及肿大,心肺腹查体未见特殊异常。专科查体:脊柱下腰段棘突压痛,双下肢膝以下皮肤感觉减退,双侧股四头肌、髂腰肌肌力Ⅳ级,双侧背伸、胫前肌肌力Ⅱ级。双侧膝腱反射、跟腱反射减弱,骨盆分离挤压试验(-),足趾末梢血供良好,病理反射未引出。     

Upper lumbar burst fracture due to recreational high jumping into a river: report of five cases

Introduction  Spinal injuries resulting from entering into water usually occur in the cervical region, with few reported in the thoracolumbar region. Although the mechanism of cervical spine injury caused by diving is known, less is known regarding the mechanism of upper lumbar spine injury. Materials and methods  The study subjects were five patients (mean age, 32.8 years), inexperienced in diving from heights, who were referred for burst fractures (Denis type B) at L1 caused while jumping into a river from a 12-m-high bridge between 2004 and 2005. Three patients were treated surgically and two were treated conservatively. Their clinical outcomes were reviewed and the mechanism of upper lumbar spine injury was discussed. Results  No patient experienced neurological deficit or low back pain after treatment, and all returned to their previous activities within 1 year. Impact with the surface of the river with back and hip flexed may be a major cause of upper lumbar spine injury. Conclusions  To minimize the incidence of upper lumbar burst fracture during recreational high jumping into water, it is important that jumpers, especially inexperienced jumpers, should be instructed to jump with their backs and hips straight.     

腰椎爆裂骨折硬脊膜完整性术前评估指标分析

[目的]评价腰椎爆裂骨折患者硬膜完整性的术前评估指标。[方法]回顾性分析本院2016年6月～2018年6月手术治疗的68例腰椎爆裂骨折患者,比较术前X线片、CT、MRI及伤椎彩超检查与术中所见。[结果]根据手术所见硬膜是否完整将患者分为两组,其中破裂组30例,完整组38例。两组年龄、性别、BMI、受伤至手术时间以及X线片椎体压缩比差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。破裂组CT横断位上椎管容积压缩比值大于完整组,两组间差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。与完整组相比,破裂组更高比例的后方韧带复合体损伤、椎板"V型"纵裂,以及彩超硬膜纵切不连续表现,两组间差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。多因素逻辑回归分析显示:CT横断位椎管容积压缩比值大、椎板纵裂;MRI片上后方韧带复合体损伤,椎板"V型"纵裂;彩超硬膜纵切不连续表现均与硬膜破裂显著相关(P0.05)。其中彩超硬膜纵切不连续对诊断硬膜破裂OR值最大。[结论]术前伤椎彩超检查能提高腰椎爆裂骨折硬膜是否完整性的诊断率,对术前评估、治疗方案选择具有重要意义。