Safety and immunogenicity of 2010-2011 H1N12009-containing trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in children 12-59 months of age previously given AS03-adjuvanted H1N12009 pandemic vaccine: a PHAC/CIHR Influenza Research Network (PCIRN) study

Background

Concern arose in 2010 that reactogenicity, particularly febrile seizures, to influenza A/H1N1-containing 2010–2011 trivalent seasonal inactivated influenza vaccine (TIV) could occur in young children who had been previously immunized and/or infected with the pandemic strain. We conducted a pre-season study of 2010–2011 TIV safety and immunogenicity in children 12–59 months of age to inform public health decision making.

Methods

Children immunized with 1 or 2 doses of the pandemic vaccine, with or without the 2009–10 TIV, received 1 or 2 doses of 2010–11 TIV in an observational, multicentre Canadian study. Standard safety monitoring was enhanced by a telephone call at ∼24 h post-TIV when adverse events were expected to peak. Summary safety reports were rapidly reported to public health before the launch of public programs. TIV immunogenicity was assessed day 0, and 21 days after final vaccination. Clinical Trials Registration NCT01180621.

Results

Among 207 children, a general adverse event was reported by 60.9% of children post-dose one and by 58.3% post-dose two. Only severe fever (>38.5 °C) was more common in two-dose compared to one dose recipients (16.7%, n = 4 v. 1.0%, n = 2). At baseline 99.0% of participants had A/H1N1 hemagglutinin inhibition (HAI) titers ≥10, and 85.5% had a protective titer of ≥40 (95% CI 80.0, 90.0). Baseline geometric mean titers (GMT) were higher in recipients of a 2-dose schedule of pandemic vaccine compared to one-dose recipients: 153.1 (95% CI 126.2, 185.7) v. 78.8 ((58.1, 106.8, p < 0.001). At 21 days, all regulatory criteria for influenza vaccine immunogenicity were exceeded for A/H1N1 and H3N2, but responses to the B antigen were poor. No correlations between reactogenicity and either baseline high influenza titers or serologic response to revaccination were evident.

Conclusions

Infants and toddlers who received AS03-adjuvanted A/H1N1 2009 vaccine up to 11 months earlier retained high titers in the subsequent season but re-exposure to A/H1N1 2009 antigen in TIV resulted in no unusual adverse effects and 100% were sero-protected for A/H1N1 after receipt of the 2010–11 TIV.     

A non-adjuvanted whole-virus H1N1 pandemic vaccine is well tolerated and highly immunogenic in children and adolescents and induces substantial immunological memory

This phase 1/2 open-label, randomized clinical study investigated the safety and immunogenicity of a non-adjuvanted, whole virus, Vero cell-derived H1N1 pandemic influenza vaccine (A/H1N1/California/07/2009) in children and adolescents (6 months to 17 years). Subjects were stratified by age (6–11 months, 12–35 months, 3–8 years, 9–17 years) to receive two vaccinations 21 days apart of either the 3.75 μg or 7.5 μg dose. A booster with a licensed trivalent seasonal (2010/2011) influenza vaccine was administered one year after the first vaccination to a subgroup that had previously received the 7.5 μg dose.     

Inactivated trivalent seasonal influenza vaccine induces limited cross-reactive neutralizing antibody responses against 2009 pandemic and 1934 PR8 H1N1 strains

Background

In June 2009, we conducted a prospective study in Singapore on 51 individuals to determine their serologic responses before and following receipt of the 2009 Southern Hemisphere seasonal influenza vaccine.

Materials and methods

Paired serum samples were obtained before and 3–4 weeks after vaccination. Virus microneutralization assays were performed to quantify antibodies against A/Brisbane/59/2007 vaccine, pandemic H1N1-2009 and A/Puerto Rico/08/34 H1N1 strains.

Results

Post-vaccination, 43%, 12% and 24% of subjects displayed a 4-fold or greater rise in neutralizing antibody titers against the three strains, respectively. There was a positive correlation among individuals who showed increased titers to both pandemic H1N1-2009 and A/Puerto Rico/08/34 (p < 0.001). However, this correlation was not observed for A/Brisbane/59/2007 with either strain. The relative conservation and accessibility of predicted B-cell epitopes may explain the limited cross-reactivity of the antibodies directed against common H1N1 epitopes.

Conclusions

These results suggest that seasonal influenza vaccination confers a certain degree of cross-protection to other H1N1 strains. The correlation in cross-reactive antibody titers to A/Puerto Rico/08/34 and pandemic H1N1-2009 implies that previous exposure to pre-1957 H1N1 strains may confer some protection against the 2009 pandemic strain.     

Safety and immunogenicity of a trivalent single dose seasonal influenza vaccine containing pandemic A(H1N1) antigen in younger and elderly subjects: a phase III open-label single-arm study

Background

During the pandemic of the 2009 A(H1N1) influenza virus strain, 20-40% of the population in some areas were infected. Infection with A(H1N1) may be mild, with an average case fatality rate below 0.25%, but severe disease is not limited to patients with underlying medical conditions. Since A(H1N1) is expected to continue to circulate it is included in the seasonal influenza vaccines for the 2010-2011 winter season. We investigated the immunogenicity and safety of a preservative-free non-adjuvanted seasonal trivalent influenza vaccine.

Methods

We conducted a single center single-arm study involving 142 subjects (77 adults of 18-60 years and 65 subjects 61 years and above) to test the immunogenicity, safety, and tolerability of a trivalent split influenza vaccine. The vaccine contained 15 μg of hemagglutinin of each of the virus strains recommended for the 2010-2011 northern hemisphere winter season (A/California/7/2009 (H1N1)-like strain; A/Perth/16/2009 (H3N2)-like strain; B/Brisbane/60/2008-like strain) in a non-adjuvanted preservative-free formulation. Antibody response to each antigen was measured by hemagglutination inhibition (HI) 21 days after immunization. Subject diary cards and additional telephone interviews were used to assess the safety profile.

Results

By day 21 after the vaccination, seroconversion, or a 4-fold antibody increase in HI antibody titers, was detectable against A(H1N1) in 84% and 75% of younger and older adults, against A(H3N2) in 80% and 57%, and against the B influenza strain in 61% and 33%. HI antibody titers of 40 or more were observed against A(H1N1) in 99% and 90% of younger and older adults, against A(H3N2) in 100% and 90%, and against the B influenza strain in 91% and 78%. Pre-vaccination antibody titers were protective against A(H1N1), A(H3N2), and B in 26%, 44% and 33%, respectively of the adults below 61 years and in 27%, 54% and 44% of the subjects of 61 years and above. Local and systemic reactions were more common in younger than in older subjects and the most frequently reported reactions were pain at the injection site (36%), myalgia (24%), and fatigue (15%). Five percent elderly subjects and 1% of younger subjects had mild or moderate unsolicited adverse events such as prolonged ecchymosis or night sweats that resolved within 7 days after vaccination.

Conclusions

This single dose trivalent seasonal influenza vaccine generated protective antibodies to all three viral strains and had an acceptable safety profile in both younger and older adults (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01147081).     

Association between obesity and vulnerability and serologic response to influenza vaccination in older adults

Background

Serologic response to influenza vaccination declines with age. Few other host factors are known to be associated with serologic response. Our objective was to determine whether obesity and vulnerability independently predicted serologic response to influenza vaccination.

Methods

Adults ≥50 years were recruited during the 2008–2009 influenza season. Subjects provided pre- and post-vaccination sera for measuring antibody titers to 2008–2009 vaccine components. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight (kg)/height (m²). Data were collected on vulnerability using the vulnerable elders survey (VES13). Logistic regression evaluated the associations between obesity and vulnerability and the serologic response to vaccination (both seroprotection and seroconversion), adjusting for gender, age, comorbidities, pre-vaccination titer, and site.

Results

Mean (±standard deviation) age of 415 study subjects was 65 ± 10 years; 40% were obese. Mean BMI was 29 ± 5.6 kg/m²; mean VES13 was 1.6 ± 1.8. The proportions of subjects who seroconverted and had seroprotective titers were 40% and 49%, respectively, for A/Brisbane/59 (H1N1); 73% and 80% for A/Brisbane/10 (H3N2); and 34% and 94% for B/Florida. Modified VES-13 (score 0–10, with 10 being most vulnerable) was not associated with seroprotection against H1N1 or H3N2, and VES-13 was directly associated with seroconversion to H1N1 but not H3N2 or B. Obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m² vs. BMI 18.5–30 kg/m²) was not associated with seroprotection for H1N1 or H3N2; obesity was directly associated with seroconversion to H3N2 but not H1N1 or B. Age was inversely associated with seroprotection and seroconversion against H1N1 and with seroconversion to influenza B.

Conclusion

Based on this sample of older healthy subjects, there were no consistent relationships between VES 13 or obesity and either seroprotection or seroconversion to three influenza vaccine antigens.     

AF03-adjuvanted and non-adjuvanted pandemic influenza A (H1N1) 2009 vaccines induce strong antibody responses in seasonal influenza vaccine-primed and unprimed mice

Pandemic influenza vaccines have been manufactured using the A/California/07/2009 (H1N1) strain as recommended by the World Health Organization. We evaluated in mice the immunogenicity of pandemic (H1N1) 2009 vaccine and the impact of prior vaccination against seasonal trivalent influenza vaccines (TIV) on antibody responses against pandemic (H1N1) 2009. In naïve mice, a single dose of unadjuvanted H1N1 vaccine (3 μg of HA) was shown to elicit hemagglutination inhibition (HI) antibody titers >40, a titer associated with protection in humans against seasonal influenza. A second vaccine dose of pandemic (H1N1) 2009 vaccine strongly increased these titers, which were consistently higher in mice previously primed with TIV than in naïve mice. At a low immunization dose (0.3 μg of HA), the AF03-adjuvanted vaccine elicited higher HI antibody titers than the corresponding unadjuvanted vaccines in both naïve and TIV-primed animals, suggesting a potential for antigen dose-sparing. These results are in accordance with the use in humans of a split-virion inactivated pandemic (H1N1) 2009 vaccine formulated with or without AF03 adjuvant to protect children and young adults against influenza A (H1N1) 2009 infection.     

A randomised, single-blind, dose-range study to assess the immunogenicity and safety of a cell-culture-derived A/H1N1 influenza vaccine in adult and elderly populations

Background

Modern cell-culture production techniques and the use of adjuvants helps to ensure that the global demand for pandemic influenza vaccine can be met. This study aimed to assess the immunogenicty and safety profiles of various cell-culture-derived A/H1N1 pandemic vaccine formulations in healthy adult and elderly subjects.

Methods

Adult (18–60 years) subjects (n = 544) received vaccine either containing 3.75 μg of antigen with half the standard dose of MF59^® (Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics) adjuvant, 7.5 μg antigen with a full dose of MF59, or a non-adjuvanted vaccine containing 15 μg of antigen. Elderly (≥61 years) subjects (n = 268) received either the 3.75 μg or 7.5 μg adjuvanted formulations. Two priming vaccine doses were administered 3 weeks apart, followed by a single booster dose of seasonal influenza vaccine 1 year later. Immunogenicity was assessed 3 weeks after each vaccination. The safety profile of each formulation was evaluated throughout the study.

Results

A single primary dose of each A/H1N1 vaccine formulation was sufficient to meet all three European (CHMP) licensure criteria for pandemic influenza vaccines in adult subjects. Two licensure criteria were met after one vaccine dose in elderly subjects; two primary doses were required to meet all three criteria in this age group. The highest antibody titres were observed in response to the 7.5 μg vaccine containing a full dose of MF59 adjuvant. All subjects rapidly generated seroprotective antibody titres in response to booster vaccination.

Conclusion

This study identified one 3.75 μg vaccine dose containing half the standard dose of MF59 adjuvant as optimal for adults, two doses were optimal for elderly subjects. The antigen-sparing properties of MF59, and rapid, modern, cell-culture production techniques represent significant steps towards meeting the global demand for influenza vaccine.     

Cell culture (Vero cell) derived whole-virus non-adjuvanted H5N1 influenza vaccine induces long-lasting cross-reactive memory immune response: Homologous or heterologous booster response following two dose or single dose priming

Background

Influenza pandemic preparedness involves priming of the population with pre-pandemic vaccines. Such vaccines should be well tolerated and induce a long-lasting immunological memory that can effectively be boosted with a single dose of pandemic vaccine once available. The presented studies assessed different prime-boost regimens with a Vero cell-derived whole virus non-adjuvanted H5N1 vaccine.

Methods

In one study, 281 healthy adult (18–59 years) and 280 elderly (≥60 years) subjects received two vaccinations, 21 days apart, with Vero cell-derived whole virus non-adjuvanted H5N1 vaccine (7.5 μg HA antigen A/Vietnam/1203/2004) followed by a 6, 12–15, or 24 month booster (7.5 or 3.75 μg A/Indonesia/05/2005 or A/Vietnam/1203/2004). In the other study, 230 healthy adults (18–59 years) received single dose priming (7.5 μg A/Vietnam/1203/2004) followed by a 12 month booster (7.5 or 3.75 μg A/Indonesia/05/2005). Antibody responses were assessed by microneutralization (MN) and single radial hemolysis (SRH) assay. Vaccine safety was assessed throughout.

Results

Two dose priming was equally immunogenic in adults and the elderly: >72% of subjects in each population achieved MN titers ≥1:20 after the second vaccination. Booster vaccinations at 6, 12–15, and 24 months induced substantial antibody increases to both strains: after a 7.5 μg A/Indonesia/05/2005 booster, 93–95% of adults and 72–84% of the elderly achieved MN titers ≥ 1:20 against this strain. Homologous and heterologous booster responses were higher in the 7.5 μg dose group than in the 3.75 μg dose group. Booster responses following single dose priming were similar; a 7.5 μg booster dose induced homologous MN titers ≥1:20 in 93% of subjects.

Conclusions

A Vero cell derived whole virus non-adjuvanted H5N1 influenza vaccine is well tolerated and induces long-lasting cross-clade immunological memory that can be effectively boosted 1–2 years after two dose or single dose priming, supporting its suitability for pre-pandemic vaccination.     

A cell culture-derived whole-virus H5N1 vaccine induces long-lasting cross-clade protective immunity in mice which is augmented by a homologous or heterologous booster vaccination

Background

Preparation for an H5N1 influenza pandemic in humans could include priming the population in the pre-pandemic period with a vaccine produced from an existing H5N1 vaccine strain, with the possibility of boosting with a pandemic virus vaccine when it becomes available. We investigated the longevity of the immune response after one or two priming immunizations with a whole-virus H5N1 vaccine and the extent to which this can be boosted by later immunization with either a homologous or heterologous vaccine.

Methods

Mice received one or two priming immunizations with a Vero cell culture-derived, whole-virus clade 1 H5N1 vaccine formulated to contain either 750 ng or 30 ng hemagglutinin. Six months after the first priming immunization, mice received either a booster immunization with the same clade 1 vaccine or a heterologous clade 2.1 vaccine, or buffer. Humoral and cellular immune responses were evaluated before and at regular intervals after immunizations. Three weeks after booster immunization, mice were challenged with a lethal dose of wild-type H5N1 virus from clades 1, 2.1 or 2.2 and survival was monitored for 14 days.

Results

One or two priming immunizations with the 750 ng or 30 ng HA formulations, respectively, induced H5N1-neutralizing antibody titers which were maintained for ≥6 months and provided long-term cross-clade protection against wild-type virus challenge. Both humoral and cellular immune responses were substantially increased by a booster immunization after 6 months. The broadest protective immunity was provided by an immunization regimen consisting of one or two priming immunizations with a clade 1 vaccine and a boosting immunization with a clade 2.1 vaccine.

Conclusions

These data support the concept that pre-pandemic vaccination can provide robust and long-lasting H5N1 immunity which could be effectively boosted by immunization either with another pre-pandemic vaccine or with the pandemic strain vaccine.     

Randomized clinical trial of immunogenicity and safety of a recombinant H1N1/2009 pandemic influenza vaccine containing Advax™ polysaccharide adjuvant

Background

Timely vaccine supply is critical during influenza pandemics. A recombinant hemagglutinin (rHA)-based vaccine could overcome production hurdles of egg-based vaccines but has never previously been tested in a real-life pandemic setting. The primary aim was to determine the efficacy of a recombinant pandemic vaccine and whether its immunogenicity could be enhanced by a novel polysaccharide adjuvant (Advax™).

Methods

281 adults aged 18–70 years were recruited in a randomized, subject and observer blinded, parallel-group study of rHA H1N1/2009 vaccine with or without adjuvant. Immunizations were at 0 and 3 weeks with rHA 3, 11 or 45 μg. Serology and safety was followed for 6 months.

Results

At baseline, only 9.1% of subjects (95% CI: 6.0–13.2) had seroprotective H1N1/2009 titers. Seroconversion rates varied by rHA dose, presence of adjuvant, subject age and number of immunizations. Eighty percent (95% CI: 52–96) of 18–49 year olds who received rHA 45 μg with adjuvant were seroprotected at week 3, representing a 11.1-fold increase in antibody titers from baseline. Advax™ adjuvant increased seroprotection rates by 1.9 times after the first, and 2.5 times after the second, immunization when compared to rHA alone. Seroprotection was sustained at 26 weeks and the vaccine was well tolerated with no safety issues.

Conclusions

The study confirmed the ability to design, manufacture, and release a recombinant vaccine within a short time from the start of an actual influenza pandemic. Advax™ adjuvant significantly enhanced rHA immunogenicity.     

Clinical development of a Vero cell culture-derived seasonal influenza vaccine

Background

Cell culture technologies have the potential to improve the robustness and flexibility of influenza vaccine supply and to substantially shorten manufacturing timelines. We investigated the safety, immunogenicity and efficacy of a Vero cell culture-derived seasonal influenza vaccine and utilized these studies to establish a serological correlate of vaccine protection.

Methods

Two multicenter, randomized, double-blind phase III trials were undertaken in the US during the 2008–2009 Northern hemisphere influenza season, in young (18–49 years) and older (50–64 years and ≥65 years) adult subjects. 7250 young adults were randomized 1:1 to receive either Vero-derived vaccine or placebo. 3210 older adult subjects were randomized 8:1 to receive either Vero-derived vaccine or a licensed egg-derived vaccine. Serum hemagglutination inhibition antibody titers were assessed 21 days post-vaccination. Vaccine efficacy in preventing cell culture-confirmed influenza infection was determined for the young adult population. Local and systemic adverse events were recorded in both studies.

Results

The Vero-derived vaccine was safe and well tolerated in both young and older adults. All US and European immunological licensing thresholds were comfortably met in both populations. Vaccine efficacy in young adults was 79% against A/H1N1 viruses antigenically matching the corresponding vaccine strain and 78.5% for all antigenically matched influenza viruses. A hemagglutination inhibition antibody titer of ≥1:15 provided a reliable correlate of protection for the Vero-derived influenza vaccine, with no additional benefit at titers >1:30. Bridging of the correlate of protection established in the young adult population to the older adult immunogenicity data demonstrated the likely effectiveness of the Vero-derived vaccine in the older adult population.

Conclusions

A Vero cell culture-derived seasonal influenza vaccine is safe, immunogenic and protects against infection with influenza virus. The novel vaccine technology has the potential to make a substantial contribution to improving influenza vaccine supply.

Clinical trial registration

The studies are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT00566345 and NCT00782431.     

Safety and immunogenicity of an MF59(®)-adjuvanted A/H5N1 pre-pandemic influenza vaccine in adults and the elderly

Background

The potential consequences of an avian influenza pandemic warrants the development of safe, highly immunogenic pre-pandemic A/H5N1 vaccines with cross-clade protection. In this randomized, controlled study we compared the immunogenicity and safety of an MF59^®-adjuvanted (Novartis Vaccines, Marburg, Germany) A/H5N1 pre-pandemic vaccine with that of a licensed, MF59-adjuvanted, seasonal influenza vaccine.

Methods

Healthy adult (18–60 years, n = 3372) and elderly (≥61 years, n = 275) volunteers received either an initial dose of a licensed, non-adjuvanted, trivalent, seasonal influenza vaccine (Agrippal^®) on Day 1, followed by one dose of MF59-H5N1 study vaccine on Day 22 and a second dose of MF59-H5N1 on Day 43, or alternatively, placebo on Day 1 followed by one dose of MF59-adjuvanted seasonal reference vaccine on Day 22 and a second dose of reference vaccine on Day 43. Homologous and cross-reactive A/H5N1 antibody responses were analysed by haemagglutination inhibition (HI), single radial haemolysis (SRH), and microneutralization (MN) assays three weeks after each vaccination. Vaccine safety was assessed throughout the study.

Results

Analysis by HI assay found that two doses of MF59-H5N1 resulted in a seroconversion rate of 56% and a geometric mean ratio (GMR) of 7.1 in adult subjects. Similar results were observed on analysis by SRH (GMR 4.03; seroconversion 78% and seroprotection 91%) and MN (seroconversion 67%) assays. These data met the European licensure criteria for influenza vaccines. No significant difference in immunogenicity was detected between the adult and elderly populations. Anti-A/H5N1 cross-clade antibodies were detected by SRH, 49% of adult and 32% of elderly subjects achieved seroconversion after the second vaccine dose. Overall, MF59-H5N1 containing 7.5 μg antigen was less reactogenic than the MF59-adjuvanted trivalent seasonal vaccine which contained 15 μg antigen for each component strain.

Conclusions

Two doses of MF59-H5N1 vaccine were well tolerated and induced adequate levels of seroprotection against homologous and cross-clade A/H5N1 virus. These data support the suitability of MF59-adjuvanted A/H5N1 vaccine for pre-pandemic use in adults and the elderly.     

Factors mediating seasonal and influenza A (H1N1) vaccine acceptance among ethnically diverse populations in the urban south

Objective

We examined the acceptability of the influenza A (H1N1) and seasonal vaccinations immediately following government manufacture approval to gauge potential product uptake in minority communities. We studied correlates of vaccine acceptance including attitudes, beliefs, perceptions, and influenza immunization experiences, and sought to identify communication approaches to increase influenza vaccine coverage in community settings.

Methods

Adults ≥18 years participated in a cross-sectional survey from September through December 2009. Venue-based sampling was used to recruit participants of racial and ethnic minorities.

Results

The sample (N = 503) included mostly lower income (81.9%, n = 412) participants and African Americans (79.3%, n = 399). Respondents expressed greater acceptability of the H1N1 vaccination compared to seasonal flu immunization (t = 2.86, p = 0.005) although H1N1 vaccine acceptability was moderately low (38%, n = 191). Factors associated with acceptance of the H1N1 vaccine included positive attitudes about immunizations [OR = 0.23, CI (0.16, 0.33)], community perceptions of H1N1 [OR = 2.15, CI (1.57, 2.95)], and having had a flu shot in the past 5 years [OR = 2.50, CI (1.52, 4.10). The factors associated with acceptance of the seasonal flu vaccine included positive attitudes about immunization [OR = 0.43, CI (0.32, 0.59)], community perceptions of H1N1 [OR = 1.53, CI (1.16, 2.01)], and having had the flu shot in the past 5 years [OR = 3.53, CI (2.16, 5.78)]. Participants were most likely to be influenced to take a flu shot by physicians [OR = 1.94, CI (1.31, 2.86)]. Persons who obtained influenza vaccinations indicated that Facebook (χ² = 11.7, p = 0.02) and Twitter (χ² = 18.1, p = 0.001) could be useful vaccine communication channels and that churches (χ² = 21.5, p < 0.001) and grocery stores (χ² = 21.5, p < 0.001) would be effective “flu shot stops” in their communities.

Conclusions

In this population, positive vaccine attitudes and community perceptions, along with previous flu vaccination, were associated with H1N1 and seasonal influenza vaccine acceptance. Increased immunization coverage in this community may be achieved through physician communication to dispel vaccine conspiracy beliefs and discussion about vaccine protection via social media and in other community venues.     

A cell culture-derived whole-virus H9N2 vaccine induces high titer antibodies against hemagglutinin and neuraminidase and protects mice from severe lung pathology and weight loss after challenge with a highly virulent H9N2 isolate

Background

Influenza viruses of subtype A/H9N2 are enzootic in poultry across Asia and the Middle East and are considered to have pandemic potential. The development of new vaccine manufacturing technologies is a cornerstone of influenza pandemic preparedness.

Methods

A non-adjuvanted whole-virus H9N2 vaccine was developed using Vero cell culture manufacturing technology. The induction of hemagglutination inhibition (HI) and virus-neutralizing antibodies was assessed in CD1 mice and guinea pigs. A highly sensitive enzyme-linked lectin assay was used to investigate the induction of antibodies capable of inhibiting the enzymatic activity of the H9N2 neuraminidase. Protective efficacy against virus replication in the lung after challenge with the homologous virus was evaluated in BALB/c mice by a TCID₅₀ assay, and prevention of virus replication in the lung and associated pathology were evaluated by histology and immunohistochemistry. To investigate the ability of the vaccine to prevent severe disease, BALB/c mice were challenged with a highly virulent mouse-adapted H9N2 isolate which was generated by multiple lung-to-lung passage of wild-type virus.

Results

The vaccine elicited high titers of functional H9N2-specific HA antibodies in both mice and guinea pigs, as determined by HI and virus neutralization assays. High titer H9N2-specific neuraminidase inhibiting (NAi) antibodies were also induced in both species. Vaccinated mice were protected from lung virus replication in a dose-dependent manner after challenge with the homologous H9N2 virus. Immunohistochemical analyses confirmed the lack of virus replication in the lung and an associated substantial reduction in lung pathology. Dose-dependent protection from severe weight loss was also provided after challenge with the highly virulent mouse-adapted H9N2 virus.

Conclusions

The induction of high titers of H9N2-specific HI, virus-neutralizing and NAi antibodies and dose-dependent protection from virus replication and severe disease in animal models suggest that the Vero cell culture-derived whole-virus vaccine will provide an effective intervention in the event of a H9N2 pandemic situation.     

Poor immune response to a standard single dose non-adjuvanted vaccination against 2009 pandemic H1N1 influenza virus A in the adult and elder hemodialysis patients

Background

Hemodialysis patients have higher risk of mortality and morbidity when infected with 2009 pandemic H1N1 (pH1N1/09) virus. Depending on different methodologies and criteria, previous studies reported variable response rates to adjuvanted vaccines against pH1N1/09 virus in hemodialysis patients, however, the efficacy of non-adjuvanted vaccines, which are currently used in many countries such as the USA and Asian areas, has not been comprehensively evaluated in hemodialysis population before.

Methods

We evaluated the efficacy of a standard single15 μg-dose of non-adjuvanted monovalent pH1N1/09 vaccine (AdimFlu-S) in vaccine-naïve 110 hemodialysis and 173 healthy participants. When enrolling, all participants had not any clinical symptom or sign suggesting pH1N1/09 infection since the index case was identified in Taiwan. Sera from all participants were tested by hemagglutination inhibition (HI) and micro-neutralization-ELISA (microNT-ELISA) tests before and 21 days after vaccination. The outcome parameters were seroconversion rate (≥4-fold in HI titer with titer ≥1:40), seroprotection rate (HI titers ≥1:40), seroresponse rate (≥4-fold increase in HI or microNT-ELISA titer), fold of increase in geometric mean (GM) titers, and adverse effects.

Results

In method A analyses, we included all participants’ data in final analyses, and the seroconversion rates and the fold increase of GM titer after vaccination were 25.4% and 1.8 in adult (18–60-year olds) hemodialysis subgroup, and 23.4% and 1.8 in elder (>60-year olds) hemodialysis subgroup based on HI titers, which were all significantly lower than those of the corresponding healthy control subgroups. Similar trends were observed based on microNT-ELISA titers, further validating the results. Multivariable analysis revealed hemoglobin and cholesterol levels were significant predictors for seroresponse in hemodialysis patients, suggesting the possible impacts of nutrition status and anemia. In method B analyses, we excluded participants with pre-vaccination seroprotection (based on HI or microNT-ELISA criteria) in final analyses. The response rates in various subgroups from method B analyses were also similar as those from method A analyses. No severe adverse effect was noted.

Conclusions

According to the European and U.S. criteria, a single 15 μg-dose of non-adjuvanted pH1N1/09 vaccination is safe but ineffective in both adult and elder hemodialysis patients. Further studies using multiple doses or higher antigen amount are warrant to define the most appropriate regimen.     

Host immune response to A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccination and infection: a one-year prospective study on six cohorts of subjects

Background

The long-term immunogenicity after novel vaccine against A(H1N1)pdm09 administration or natural infection has not been well investigated.

Methods

Six cohorts of subjects were followed up for over one year: one-dose A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccine recipient, A(H1N1)pdm09-seasonal trivalent vaccine recipients in different orders, confirmed A(H1N1)pdm09 patients without vaccination, with previous A(H1N1)pdm09 or seasonal influenza vaccination. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells and sera samples were collected at baseline and month 1, 2, 3, 7 and 14 after vaccination (infection). The immunogenicity was determined by hemagglutination-inhibition (HI) and B cell enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assays.

Results

Single dose of A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccine elicited antibody titer of greater than 1:40 in 40% adults for 1 year and mean live of this adequate antibody was determined as 8.35 months. In contrast, responses after natural infections had lower peaking level and a relatively longer antibody duration, with estimated mean lives of 11.8 months. Pre-vaccination with the seasonal flu vaccine led to a significant reduction in HI titer to A(H1N1)pdm09 one month after vaccination, while pre-vaccination with A(H1N1)pdm09 had no effect on seasonal influenza vaccination. Seasonal flu vaccination followed by A(H1N1)pdm09 infection elicited boosting effect on antibody response against A(H1N1)pdm09. A similar memory B cell response was elicited from both vaccination and infection by ELISPOT assay.

Conclusions

The long-term decay of immunity for A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccine and natural infection indicates the need of revaccination after the host lose protection acquired from either vaccination or infection. Prior infection, rather than the pre-vaccination with seasonal influenza could act on the host immunity to elicit boosting effect on the A(H1N1)pdm09.     

Pandemic influenza A H1N1 vaccine in recipients of solid organ transplants: immunogenicity and tolerability outcomes after vero cell derived, non-adjuvanted, whole-virion vaccination

During the 2009/10 pandemic of influenza A (H1N1), the American Society of Transplantation and other health organizations recommended that immunocompromised patients should be vaccinated as the key preventive measure. Since there are no data available for the immunogenicity of the unadjuvanted pandemic influenza vaccine in immunocompromised patients - as opposed to the adjuvanted preparation - the objective of this study was to evaluate the immunogenicity of an adjuvant-free H1N1 vaccine in recipients of solid organ transplants. Patients were recruited at the Vienna General Hospital, Austria. The vaccination schedule consisted of 2 doses of a whole-virion, vero cell derived, inactivated, non-adjuvanted influenza A/California/07/2009 (H1N1) vaccine given with an interval of 3 weeks. A hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay on blood samples obtained prior to the first and after each vaccination was used for serologic analysis. The primary immunologic endpoint was the seroconversion rate, defined as the proportion of subjects with an individual 4-fold increase in HI titer of at least 1:40. In addition, virus-specific IgG antibodies to the pandemic H1N1 strain were measured using a commercially available ELISA.Twenty-five organ transplant patients (16 males, 9 females) aged 25-79 years were vaccinated and provided blood samples for serologic analysis. The time elapsed since transplantation was 10 months to 25 years (mean: 9 years; 95% CI 6-13 years). The vaccine was well tolerated and no local adverse events were noticed. After two vaccinations 37% of the patients demonstrated seroconversion in the HI assay as defined above and 70% had virus-specific IgG antibodies. Among the HI vaccine responders were 6 of 14 heart transplant recipients and 1 of 4 liver transplant recipients. The number and type of immunosuppressive agents did not significantly differ in their effect on the immune response.Our results show that the novel vero cell derived and adjuvant-free pandemic A/California/07/2009 (H1N1) influenza vaccine induced limited but measurable immune responses in adult recipients of solid organ transplants.     

Responses after one dose of a monovalent influenza A (H1N1) 2009 inactivated vaccine in Chinese population—A practical observation

Background

The globally large-scale immunization was the most important method of controlling the 2009 pandemic influenza.

Methods

We conducted an observational clinical trial, including 148 adults aged 18-60 years to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of a licensed 2009 H1N1 influenza vaccine. All subjects received a single 15-μg dose of a monovalent, unadjuvanted inactivated vaccine. Antibody titers were measured by means of hemagglutinin-inhibition assays and neutralization assays based on Real-Time Cell Analyzer (RTCA) instruments at baseline, 7 days and 21 days after vaccination.

Results

Local and systemic reactions were respectively reported by 19.1% and 22.1% of subjects. All adverse events were mild to moderate in intensity, without any deaths or serious events. By day 21 after vaccination, hemagglutinin-inhibition antibody titers of 1:40 or more were achieved in 101 of 123 (82.1%) subjects and the geometric mean titers (GMTs) increased to 1:95.27. For neutralization assays, all subjects could provide the protection against wide influenza virus, with the GMT of 1:525.44. Moreover, the rates of seroconversion, as measured using hemagglutinin-inhibition assays and neutralization assays, were 73.98% and 91.87% of subjects, respectively.

Conclusions

A single 15-μg dose of a monovalent, unadjuvanted inactivated 2009 H1N1 influenza vaccine was well tolerated, and induced a protective immune response in the majority of subjects aged 18-60 years (clinical trials gov number, NCT01055990).     

A prospective observational safety study on MF59 adjuvanted cell culture-derived vaccine,Celtura during the A/H1N1 (2009) influenza pandemic

Background

The present study was a prospective observational study to evaluate the safety profile of Celtura^®, a monovalent, cell culture-derived, inactivated subunit influenza vaccine prepared from A/California/07/2009(H1N1) with the adjuvant MF59^®. Subjects were enrolled prospectively during the H1N1 2009 influenza pandemic at medical centres in Colombia, Chile, Switzerland, and Germany during the period December 2009 to June 2010.

Methods

Subjects ages 18 and older were followed for the occurrence of adverse events (AEs) for six months after vaccination. Adverse events of special interest (AESIs) were neuritis, convulsion (seizure), anaphylaxis, encephalitis, vasculitis, Guillain-Barre syndrome, demyelinating conditions, Bell's palsy, and laboratory-confirmed vaccination failure.

Results

Overall, 7348 AEs were reported in 2296 of 3989 enrolled subjects (57.6%). Only two AEs were considered related to injection site reactions. No laboratory-confirmed cases of influenza were reported. There were 108 medically confirmed serious adverse events (SAEs) reported among 73 subjects with 6 such SAEs described as possibly or probably related to vaccination. Three fatal cases were reported and assessed as not related to vaccination. Two AESIs classified as convulsion were reported and assessed as not related to vaccination. Both AESIs occurred well outside the pre-specified 7 day risk window representing the likely timeframe of the occurrence of seizure following vaccination.

Conclusions

The results of this study support the overall good safety profile of MF59 adjuvanted cell culture-derived influenza vaccine as administered in adults during the 2009–2010 H1N1 influenza pandemic. No concern is raised regarding the occurrence of AESIs.