Safety and immunogenicity of acellular pertussis vaccine combined with diphtheria and tetanus toxoids in 17- to 24-month-old children.

A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial comparing 4 lots of acellular pertussis-diphtheria tetanus toxoids vaccine (APDT) to whole cell DTP vaccine in 397 children was conducted at 7 clinical centers. Children were immunized at 17 to 24 months of age and sera were obtained pre- and postimmunization. Sera were analyzed for antibody to pertussis antigens (pertussis toxin, filamentous hemagglutinin, with a molecular weight of 69,000 (69k) outer membrane protein and agglutinogens) and to diphtheria and tetanus toxoids. Information concerning local reactions and systemic events was collected daily for 10 days postimmunization. The acellular vaccine produced significantly fewer local reactions than whole cell DTP. Parents reported that drowsiness or fretfulness occurred significantly less often in APDT vaccine recipients compared with whole cell DTP recipients. Fever greater than or equal to 38.3 degrees C occurred in 8% of APDT vaccine recipients and in 15% of whole cell DTP vaccine recipients (P = 0.06). The only significant difference in immune response to pertussis antigens between the two vaccines was for filamentous hemagglutinin (P less than 0.01) for which significantly higher antibody concentrations were found in the APDT vaccine group. We conclude that this APDT vaccine is safe and immunogenic when administered as a booster dose to 18-month-old children.     

Extensive swelling reaction associated with diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis vaccine

Although extensive swelling reactions in the injected limb after the administration of diphtheria-tetanus toxoid-acellular pertussis vaccine have been reported previously, to our knowledge, computerized tomography images of this entity have not been published. A 4-year-old boy with extensive swelling after vaccination with diphtheria-tetanus toxoid-acellular pertussis vaccine is presented.     

Acellular pertussis vaccine boosters combined with diphtheria and tetanus toxoid boosters for adolescents: safety and immunogenicity assessment when preceded by different 5-dose DTaP/DTwP schedules

A sixth dose of tetanus, diphtheria, acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine in adolescents might produce a differing reactogenicity and/or immunogenicity response depending on the composition of the 5 prior doses of DTaP or DT-whole cell pertussis (DTwP) vaccine. Reactions and immune responses following receipt of the Sanofi Pasteur (Adacel) and GlaxoSmithKline (Boostrix) Tdap vaccines were assessed in 229 adolescents. No differences were observed for reactions to either Tdap vaccine regardless of the prior DTaP/DTwP vaccination history. Seroprotective levels and antibody concentrations were comparable regardless of prior DTaP/DTwP vaccine history. A sixth sequential dose of Tdap after 5 doses of DTaP appears safe and immunogenic.     

Safety and immunogenicity of acellular pertussis vaccine, combined with diphtheria and tetanus as the Japanese commercial Takeda vaccine, compared with the Takeda acellular pertussis component combined with Lederle's diphtheria and tetanus toxoids in two-, four- and six-month-old infants.

A double blind, randomized, controlled trial compared the safety and immunogenicity of an acellular pertussis vaccine formulated at Lederle using the Takeda acellular pertussis component combined with Lederle diphtheria and tetanus toxoids vaccines (APDT), with the commercially available Japanese Takeda vaccine (APDT-T/J) as a three-dose series to 2-, 4-, and 6-month-old children. Sera were analyzed for antibody to pertussis antigens: lymphocytosis-promoting factor; filamentous hemagglutinin; 69-kDa outer membrane protein; pertussis agglutinogens; neutralizing antibodies to LPF; and to diphtheria and tetanus toxoids. Information concerning local reactions and systemic events were collected daily for 10 days postimmunization. The overall reaction rate was low for both groups. There were no reactions that contraindicated subsequent vaccine and no serious adverse events. For local reactions statistically significant differences between the groups were seen only for a greater incidence of induration in the APDT group at 2 months (12% vs. 0%, P < 0.01), and at 4 months (8% vs. 0%, P = 0.4) compared to the APDT-T/J group. Of the few systemic reactions the only statistically significant difference between the vaccine groups was a greater incidence of fretfulness in the APDT group after the initial immunization (12% vs. 2%, P = 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the immune response between the two vaccines at the 7-month visit. We conclude that APDT is equivalent to the commercially available Takeda vaccine (APDT-T/J).     

Protective efficacy of the Takeda acellular pertussis vaccine combined with diphtheria and tetanus toxoids following household exposure of Japanese children

The clinical efficacy of an acellular pertussis vaccine containing lymphocytosis-promoting factor, filamentous hemagglutinin, agglutinogens, and the 69-kd outer membrane protein, combined with diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and adsorbed onto an aluminum salt, was assessed in a household contact study. The occurrence of pertussis 7 to 30 days following home exposure among 62 previously vaccinated children was compared with that among 62 unvaccinated children similarly exposed. Classic whooping cough was diagnosed in 43 unimmunized children, and 1 vaccinated child experienced a 5-week illness that was probably pertussis (efficacy, 98%; 95% confidence interval, 84% to 99%). A few children in each group incurred respiratory illnesses that may have represented mild, atypical pertussis; including these as probable pertussis, vaccine efficacy was 81% (95% confidence interval, 64% to 90%). It is concluded that prior immunization with this four-component pertussis vaccine combined with diphtheria and tetanus toxoids is highly efficacious in preventing pertussis.     

Acellular pertussis vaccine: immunogenicity and safety of an acellular pertussis vs. a whole cell pertussis vaccine combined with diphtheria and tetanus toxoids as a booster in 18- to 24-month old children

An acellular pertussis vaccine principally containing two purified pertussis antigens, filamentous hemagglutinin and lymphocytosis-promoting factor, combined with diphtheria and tetanus toxoids was compared to conventional diphtheria-tetanus toxoids-whole cell pertussis for adverse effects and serologic responses in a group of 120 children who were from 18 to 24 months of age. Three vaccinations at 2, 4 and 6 months of age with diphtheria-tetanus toxoids-whole cell pertussis had been administered previously. Adverse effects occurred more frequently with the diphtheria-tetanus toxoids-whole cell pertussis than with diphtheria-tetanus toxoids-acellular pertussis vaccine. Fever occurred significantly more often and to a higher degree in the whole cell pertussis vaccine recipients with a peak difference occurring 6 hours after immunization (P = 0.00008). Local swelling, redness, warmth and tenderness at the injection site also occurred significantly more frequently following whole cell pertussis vaccination. No major sequelae were noted in either group. The antibody responses to lymphocytosis-promoting factor were similar for the two vaccines. The diphtheria-tetanus toxoids-acellular pertussis vaccine produced significantly lower pertussis agglutinin titers (P = 0.00001) but significantly higher antibody to filamentous hemagglutinin (P = 0.05) and to diphtheria (P = 0.03). The protective role of antibody to pertussis agglutinins vs. filamentous hemagglutinin and lymphocytosis-promoting factor continues as a central issue in the quest for a new pertussis vaccine. A clinical efficacy trial is needed.     

Safety and immunogenicity of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in combination with diphtheria,tetanus toxoid,pertussis and Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccine

BACKGROUND: Pneumococcal polysaccharide/protein conjugate vaccines (PnCV) are immunogenic and effective in infancy. However, an addition to the nine currently recommended vaccine injections during the first year of life of African children may be a deterrent to participation in a PnCV program. Thus we have evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of a 9-valent PnCV (Wyeth Lederle Pediatrics and Vaccines) mixed with diphtheria, tetanus toxoid, cell pertussis and type b (TETRAMUNE). METHODS: Healthy Gambian infants were randomized at the age of 2 months to receive three doses 1 month apart of either (1) placebo reconstituted in TETRAMUNE in the right thigh (control) or (2) PnCV in the left thigh and TETRAMUNE in the right thigh (separate) or (3) PnCV reconstituted in TETRAMUNE as a single injection in the right thigh (combined). The vaccines were given together with routine Expanded Program on Immunization vaccines. Adverse reactions were recorded after vaccination, and antibody concentrations were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. RESULTS: Local induration and tenderness were observed more commonly at the site of injection of TETRAMUNE than at the site of injection with PnCV after each dose of vaccination. Swelling at the site of injection was encountered more frequently at the site of administration of TETRAMUNE than at the site of administration PnCV ( P< 0.00001 for Doses 1 and 2 and P< 0.0009 for Dose 3). Swelling at the site of administration of TETRAMUNE mixed with PnCV was comparable with that observed for TETRAMUNE alone. Although most mothers reported that the babies "felt hot" 24 h after each injection, febrile reactions (temperature, >or=38 degrees C) were infrequent and resolved with antipyretics. Geometric mean titer for anti-polyribosylribitol phosphate antibody was 11.6 microg/ml [95% confidence limits (95% CI), 9.2, 14.6] in the control group and comparable with 13.3 microg/ml (95% CI 11.0, 16.0) in the combined group and significantly higher at 17.9 microg/ml (95% CI 14.7, 21.9; P= 0.01) in the separate group. Geometric mean concentrations of serotype-specific pneumococcal antibodies were higher in the combined group than the separate group for all nine serotypes. Antibody responses to diphtheria and pertussis antigens were similar in all groups. Anti-tetanus toxoid antibody concentrations were lowest in the combined group (6.66 IU/ml, 95% CI 5.77, 7.68 in the control group; 5.15 IU/ml, 95% CI 4.39, 6.03 in the combined group; P= 0.02). However, all vaccinees achieved protective antibody values. CONCLUSION: The combination of TETRAMUNE and PnCV is safe and immunogenic.     

An evaluation of the safety and immunogenicity of a five-component acellular pertussis, diphtheria, and tetanus toxoid vaccine (DTaP) when combined with a Haemophilus influenzae type b-tetanus toxoid conjugate vaccine (PRP-T) in Taiwanese infants

OBJECTIVE: Immunologic interference particular to the Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) response has been observed with previous acellular pertussis-Hib combination vaccines. To test this hypothesis a clinical trial to assess the safety and immunogenicity of a five-component (pertussis toxoid [PT], filamentous hemagglutinin [FHA], pertactin [PRN], and fimbriae 2 and 3 [FIM]), pertussis vaccine combined with diphtheria and tetanus toxoids (DTaP) when given simultaneously with a lyophilized Hib-tetanus toxoid conjugate vaccine (PRP-T) in infants at 2, 4, 6, and 18 months of age was conducted. The study compared two methods of administration: both vaccines combined in a single syringe and administered as a single injection, or both vaccines administered concurrently but at separate sites of injection. METHODS: Healthy 2-month-old infants were enrolled at the National Taiwan University Hospital. DTaP, PRP-T, and oral poliomyelitis vaccine (OPV) were given at 2, 4, 6, and 18 months. Reaction information was collected by telephone 2 days after each vaccination. Serum was collected at 2, 6, 7, 18, and 19 months of age. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-five healthy infants were enrolled in Taiwan, of which 127 (94%) completed the 18-month booster: 68 received the combined vaccine and 67 the separate vaccines. All vaccines were well tolerated. No differences in rates of local and systemic reactions were seen between the two methods of administration. No serious adverse events were reported. Serologic responses were comparable between the groups. Pertussis responses (enzyme-liked immunoabsorbant assay units [EU]/mL) at 7 months were, for combined versus separate, PT (131 vs 105), FHA (116 vs 116), PRN (100 vs 77), and FIM (922 vs 702). At 19 months, pertussis results were, for combined versus separate, PT (216 vs 182), FHA (203 vs 200), PRN (263 vs 197), and FIM (892 vs 732). Only the 7-month PT response in the combined group was significantly higher (combined 131 EU/mL vs separate 105 EU/mL). After the third dose (age 6 months), all subjects achieved serologic serum antibody levels indicative of protection against Hib, diphtheria, tetanus, and poliovirus types 1, 2, and 3. In fact, 96% of children had anti-PRP levels indicative of protection (>/=0.15 microgram/mL) against Hib after only two doses. At 7 months, anti-PRP geometric mean titer values were 11.8 micrograms/mL in the combined group compared with 13.0 micrograms/mL in the separate group. The anti-PRP geometric mean titers after the 18-month booster were 58.5 micrograms/mL in the combined group versus 55.3 micrograms/mL in the separate group. CONCLUSION: The five-component DTaP vaccine may be combined with PRP-T vaccine without clinically significant immunologic interaction when given in a 2-, 4-, 6-, and 18-month schedule.     

Clinical reactions and immunogenicity of the BIKEN acellular diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and pertussis vaccine in 4- through 6-year-old US children.

OBJECTIVE--To compare the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of a two-component acellular pertussis vaccine with a whole-cell diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and pertussis vaccine (W-DTP) when administered as a booster to children 4 through 6 years of age. DESIGN--This was a randomized, double-blind study. SETTING--Children in this study were from three general pediatric practices (two were private, one was university-affiliated). PARTICIPANTS--Three hundred and sixteen 4- through 6-year-old children who had received four previous W-DTP immunizations at the recommended times were studied. SELECTION PROCEDURES AND INTERVENTIONS--Children were randomly assigned in a 1:3 ratio to receive either W-DTP or one of three lots of acellular diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and pertussis vaccine (A-DTP). The A-DTPs contained 3.75 micrograms each of lymphocytosis promoting factor and filamentous hemagglutinin protein nitrogen per 0.5 mL and the same concentrations of diphtheria and tetanus toxoids as W-DTP. Serum samples were obtained on the day of immunization and 4 to 6 weeks later. Adverse reactions were recorded by parents at 6, 24, 48, and 72 hours. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS--An indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method determined IgG antibody response to lymphocytosis promoting factor, filamentous hemagglutinin, and tetanus toxoid; a CHO cell assay measured neutralizing antibodies to pertussis toxin; and serum neutralization on VERO cells assayed diphtheria antitoxin. One month after booster doses were administered, the geometric mean antibody levels for A-DTP vs W-DTP were IgG filamentous hemagglutinin, 362 vs 104 ELISA U/mL; IgG lymphocytosis promoting factor, 408 vs 81 ELISA U/mL; CHO cell, 210 vs 107; diphtheria, 21.7 vs 12.1 U/mL; and tetanus, 2.86 vs 2.04 Eq/mL. Following immunization with A-DTP, local and systemic adverse experiences were 30% to 50% and 20% to 30% fewer, respectively, as compared with W-DTP. CONCLUSIONS--The BIKEN A-DTP vaccine used in this study demonstrates enhanced immunogenicity to lymphocytosis promoting factor, filamentous hemagglutinin, and other measured antigens and less reactogenicity compared with licensed W-DTP [corrected].     

Additional recommendations for use of tetanus toxoid, reduced-content diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap)

The American Academy of Pediatrics and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention are amending previous recommendations and making additional recommendations for the use of tetanus toxoid, reduced-content diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap). Review of the results from clinical trials and other studies has revealed no excess reactogenicity when Tdap is given within a short interval after other tetanus- or diphtheria-containing toxoid products, and accrual of postmarketing adverse-events reports reveals an excellent safety record for Tdap. Thus, the recommendation for caution regarding Tdap use within any interval after a tetanus- or diphtheria-containing toxoid product is removed. Tdap should be given when it is indicated and when no contraindication exists. In further efforts to protect people who are susceptible to pertussis, the American Academy of Pediatrics and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend a single dose of Tdap for children 7 through 10 years of age who were underimmunized with diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis (DTaP). Also, the age for recommendation for Tdap is extended to those aged 65 years and older who have or are likely to have contact with an infant younger than 12 months (eg, health care personnel, grandparents, and other caregivers).     

Safety and immunogenicity of combined or associated administration of PRP-T vaccine with diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis vaccine in Thai children

To assess whether the combination of a diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis vaccine with a Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccine (PRP-T) had any effect on immunogenicity or safety compared with separate administration of the vaccines, 158 infants were randomized to receive the vaccines either in association or as a combination at 2, 4, and 6 months of age. A total of 126 infants (59 associated, 67 combination) completed the three-dose regimen and were analysed for immunogenicity and safety. With respect to safety, there were no significant differences between the two groups. The combination vaccine was well tolerated with adverse reactions consisting mainly of transient pain, redness, induration and some low-grade fever. With respect to immunogenicity, response to PRP-T vaccine was good. Following just two doses, all infants achieved anti-PRP titers >0.15 microg/ml, regardless of whether the vaccine was given in combination or association. Following three doses, 98.5 per cent of infants in the combination group and 98.3 per cent in the association group had titers higher than 1.0 microg/ml.     

Prevention of pertussis among adolescents: recommendations for use of tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine

The purpose of this statement is to provide the rationale and recommendations for adolescent use of tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccines. Despite universal immunization of children with multiple doses of pediatric diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis (DTaP) vaccine, pertussis remains endemic with a steady increase in the number of reported cases. Two peaks in the incidence of pertussis occur in pediatric patients: infants younger than 6 months of age who are inadequately protected by the current immunization schedule and adolescents 11 through 18 years of age whose vaccine-induced immunity has waned. Significant medical and public health resources are being consumed in postexposure management of adolescent cases, contacts, and outbreaks with little beneficial effect on individuals or the epidemiology of disease. Two Tdap products were licensed in 2005 for use in people 10 through 18 years of age (Boostrix) and 11 through 64 years of age (Adacel). The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends the following: 1. Adolescents 11 to 18 years of age should receive a single dose of Tdap instead of tetanus and diphtheria toxoids (Td) vaccine for booster immunization. The preferred age for Tdap immunization is 11 to 12 years. 2. Adolescents 11 to 18 years of age who have received Td but not Tdap are encouraged to receive a single dose of Tdap. An interval of at least 5 years between Td and Tdap is suggested to reduce the risk of local and systemic reactions; however, intervals of less than 5 years can be used, particularly in settings of increased risk of acquiring pertussis, having complicated disease, or transmitting infection to vulnerable contacts. Data support acceptable safety with an interval as short as approximately 2 years. 3. Tdap and tetravalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine (MCV4 [Menactra]) should be administered during the same visit if both vaccines are indicated. If this is not feasible, MCV4 and Tdap can be administered using either sequence. When not administered simultaneously, the American Academy of Pediatrics suggests a minimum interval of 1 month between vaccines. The rationale for this strategy is to provide direct protection of immunized adolescents. With implementation of vaccine recommendations, indirect benefitalso is likely to extend to unimmunized peers and other age groups. The strategy of universal Tdap immunization at 11 to 12 years of age is cost-effective.     

Pyrexia after diphtheria/tetanus/pertussis and diphtheria/tetanus vaccines.

The temperatures of 587 children were taken before and after diphtheria/tetanus/pertussis (DTP) or diphtheria/tetanus (DT) vaccine. Only slight temperature increases were found but these were notably more frequent after plain than adsorbed DTP vaccine preparations and the frequency increased with each successive dose.     

Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of a combined adsorbed tetanus toxoid, low dose diphtheria toxoid, five component acellular pertussis and inactivated polio vaccine in six-year-old children

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to assess the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of the combined adsorbed tetanus toxoid, low dose diphtheria toxoid, 5-component acellular pertussis and inactivated polio vaccine (TdcP-IPV) as compared with a pediatric dose diphtheria formulation, combined with adsorbed tetanus toxoid and 3-component acellular pertussis (DTacP), in 6-year-old children who were immunized with 4 doses of diphtheria-tetanus-whole cell cellular pertussis (DTwcP) plus oral polio vaccine (OPV) before 2 years of age, according to the local Spanish vaccination calendar. METHODS: One hundred ninety-four healthy 6-year-old children were randomized to receive 1 dose of TdcP-IPV or 1 dose of DTacP and OPV. RESULTS: One month postvaccination, antidiphtheria and antitetanus titers were > or =0.1 IU/mL in 100% of patients in both study groups. TdcP-IPV reached 100% seroprotection rates against polio types 1, 2 and 3. In OPV recipients, these rates were 100, 100 and 96.8%, respectively. Seropositivity rates for pertussis toxin, filamentous hemagglutinin, pertactin and fimbrial components of the TdcP-IPV vaccine were 97.9, 89.6, 90.6 and 100%. The incidence of local and systemic reactions was 50.5 and 39.2% in the TdcP-IPV group and 59.4 and 38.5% in the DTacP plus OPV group, and no serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: TdcP-IPV vaccine was shown to be immunogenic and safe when given as a booster in children 6 years of age who were primed with 4 doses of DTwcP and OPV.     

Adverse effects of tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis vaccine in 6- to 7-year-old children

Although the safety profile of tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccines in adolescents and adults has been documented, few data have reported about their adverse events in children. Healthy 6- to 7-year-old children who were immunized with Tdap vaccine were evaluated for adverse events on Days 1, 2, 4, and 7 postimmunization. Information of sex, body mass index (BMI), and previous diphtheria-pertussis-tetanus (DPT) immunization history was obtained and evaluated for the association with the adverse events. A total of 243 6- to 7-year-old children were immunized with Tdap. Among the 243 children immunized, remarkable adverse events included redness more than or equal to 10?mm in 47 (19%) children, induration more than or equal to 10?mm in 57 (23%), tenderness in 130 (53%), and fever in 12 (5%). Redness and induration resolved in 7 days and fever resolved on Day 4. The adverse events were not associated with gender, BMI above the mean value, or the type of fourth DPT immunization. Adverse events after Tdap vaccination were mild and dissolved within 7 days in 6- to 7-year-old children.