Limited lamivudine and long-term hepatitis B immunoglobulin immunoprophylaxis for prevention of hepatitis B recurrence after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND: No consensus exists concerning dosage and duration of prophylactic hepatitis B immunoglobulin and lamivudine for prevention of hepatitis B recurrence after liver transplantation (LT). METHODS: Lamivudine was discontinued 12 months after LT, maintaining hepatitis B immunoglobulin prophylaxis in eight patients who received lamivudine treatment before LT. RESULTS: At LT, six patients were serum hepatitis B virus (HBV)-DNA negative, whereas two patients had low serum HBV-DNA levels. Hepatitis B surface (HBs) antigen and hepatitis B core antigen stained positively by immunohistochemistry in all hepatectomy specimens. All patients remained recurrence free during the 12 months on combination therapy with normal liver histological examination and negative HBs and HB core staining on biopsy specimens. No relapse occurred after lamivudine withdrawal during a median follow-up of 17.5 months (normal transaminases, negative serum HBs antigen, and HBV-DNA). CONCLUSIONS: Discontinuation of lamivudine 12 months after LT is feasible and safe even in patients with ongoing low viral replication at LT, providing adequate prophylaxis with hepatitis B immunoglobulins.     

Prophylactic use of low-dose, on-demand, intramuscular hepatitis B immunoglobulin and lamivudine after liver transplantation

The combination of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and antivirals (nucleos[t]ide analogs) has extended the applicability of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related liver disease. However, HBIG administrations have an extremely high cost. Herein, we evaluated our results with low-dose, on-demand, intramuscular HBIG plus lamivudine (LAM) prophylaxis after OLT. The HBV DNA status in 40 patients at the time of OLT determined the treatment: group A (n = 22), HBV DNA (-), no antiviral pretreatment; group B (n = 11), HBV DNA (-), after LAM; group C (n = 3), HBV DNA (+) after LAM (LAM resistance/Adefovir [ADV] unavailable); group D (n = 2), HBV DNA (+), no antiviral pretreatment; and group E (n = 2), HBV DNA (-) after LAM + ADV (LAM resistance/ADV available). Five patients died within 12 months after OLT unrelated to HBV infection. The remaining 35 patients were followed for a median duration of 16 months (range, 6-93 months). Only two recipients from group C, who were transplanted despite LAM resistance + no ADV pretreatment, revealed recurrent HBV infections at 14 and 16 months posttransplantation; they were then treated successfully with ADV as it became available. The third group C recipient had undetectable HBV DNA at 18 months after OLT. The mean cumulative doses of HBIG administered within the first, second, and third years were 34,014, 5258, and 5090 IU, respectively. In conclusion, low-dose, on-demand, intramuscular HBIG plus (LAM +/- ADV) prophylaxis is a safe, efficient, and cost-effective regimen to prevent recurrent HBV infection following OLT. OLT despite untreated LAM resistance may require sustained higher serum HBsAb levels after surgery.     

European hepatitis B immunoglobulin trials: prevention of recurrent hepatitis B after liver transplantation

Orthotopic liver transplantation is used for treatment of liver cirrhosis and organ failure due to chronic hepatitis B infection. However, in the absence of effective antiviral therapy, patients can develop recurrent hepatitis B leading to graft failure. In this report, a review is presented of several European studies that have demonstrated the efficacy of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIg) in lowering the rate of recurrence or the severity of the recurrent infection. Clinical protocols and results of these studies are described in detail. Several important conclusions can be derived from the clinical results. HBIg is most effective when administered in high doses for a long time. Characteristics of the recipients, such as the presence or absence of viral DNA, can also affect the rate of recurrence. Intramuscular injection of HBIg has minimal side effects and results in reduced cost relative to intravenous injection.     

Low-dose intramuscular hepatitis B immune globulin and lamivudine for long-term prophylaxis of hepatitis B recurrence after liver transplantation

The combination of lamivudine and hepatitis B immunoglobulins (HBIg) to prevent recurrence of HBV hepatitis has significantly improved the survival of patients transplanted for HBV-related end-stage liver disease. Generally, HBIg are administered intravenously. We evaluated the efficacy, tolerability, and cost savings of long-term intramuscular HBIg and lamivudine in 28 patients (23 men and 5 women), who received liver transplants for acute or chronic HBV-related liver disease. Twelve patients started lamivudine before and 16 at the time of liver transplantation. HBIg were administered intravenously during the first week (50 to 70,000 IU) and intramuscularly thereafter (1200 IU every 3 to 6 weeks) to maintain an HbsAb titer >100 IU/L. Mean follow-up was 20 +/- 13 months. Only one patient experienced HBV recurrence (9 months after transplantation). This patient had failed to follow the scheduled prophylaxis. Cumulative survival at 3 years was 83%. Intramuscular HBIg were well tolerated in all cases. Cost analysis comparing intramuscular vs intravenous HBIg administration showed that 39,490 Euros were saved per patient per year. These preliminary results show that low-dose intramuscular HBIg and lamivudine are efficacious and cost-effective for long-term prophylaxis of hepatitis B recurrence after liver transplantation.     

Famciclovir therapy for recurrent hepatitis B virus infection after liver transplantation

Abstract  Between November 1993 and June 1995 18 patients received oral famciclovir (3 times 500 mg) for treatment of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reinfection after liver transplantation. Reinfection was defined as the reoccurrence of HBsAg in the serum. In the first 15 patients, famciclovir therapy was initiated after clinical signs of graft hepatitis, whereas the last 3 patients received treatment immediately after HBV-DNA was detected. Famciclovir was well-tolerated in all patients. HBV-DNA values were decreased to undetectable levels in 8 out of 18 patients. Clinical status improved in 7 patients, whereas 5 patients remained unchanged and 6 patients progressed to deteriorating graft function and death. When famciclovir was initiated early after reinfection, a response rate of approximately 66 % was observed. Late onset of therapy in patients with fulminant hepatitis generally failed to provide any clinical benefit.     

Long‐term outcome of patients with lamivudine after early cessation of hepatitis B immunoglobulin for prevention of recurrent hepatitis B following liver transplantation

Yuefeng M, Weili F, Wengxiang T, Ligang X, Guiling L, Hongwei G, Wencai L, Xiaoguang W, Wei M, Zhongyi F. Long‐term outcome of patients with lamivudine after early cessation of hepatitis B immunoglobulin for prevention of recurrent hepatitis B following liver transplantation.
Clin Transplant 2011: 25: 517–522. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: Background: The aim of this study is to examine the efficacy of long‐term prophylaxis with lamivudine (LAM) after a course of post‐operative hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) in patients who underwent liver transplantation (LT) for hepatitis B virus (HBV)‐related disease. Result: The medical records of HBV‐infected patients who underwent a LT in our institution between July 2001 and May 2005 were reviewed. There were 15 liver transplant recipients who were administered HBIG for <18 months and used LAM as a maintenance prophylaxis regime enrolled in this study. At enrollment, all patients were hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive and three patients were HBeAg positive. There were 13 patients who were HBV DNA positive with a mean viral load of 5.4 log copies/mL, and among them, 12 recipients were on antiviral therapy with LAM (100 mg/d orally) for 12–168 d, resulting in HBV DNA negative levels in nine patients prior to their transplant. HBV recurrence post‐LT was noted in two patients who had very high‐HBV DNA levels pre‐LT. Both of these patients showed LAM‐resistant mutation at the time of recurrence. The 11 patients who were HBV DNA negative before LT (low‐risk patients) had no HBV recurrence during a follow‐up at a median of 58 months post‐LT. This included five patients who had intermittent low‐level HBV DNA post‐LT (HBsAg negative), of whom two had YMDD mutation and these two were given adefovir in addition to LAM. Conclusion: Our retrospective study demonstrated excellent long‐term outcomes in the low‐risk patients treated with LAM after a short course of HBIG.     

Lamivudine or lamivudine combined with hepatitis B immunoglobulin in prophylaxis of hepatitis B recurrence after liver transplantation: a meta-analysis

There is a controversy over whether the different outcomes of prophylaxis of hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence are attributable to different treatments. A systematic review and a meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate lamivudine monotherapy and combined therapy of lamivudine and hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) in HBV infected liver recipients. A fixed effects model was used for statistical pooling of relative risks (RR) for the different outcomes. Six articles (551 patients) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Statistically significant differences were observed between lamivudine monotherapy and lamivudine + HBIG therapy in hepatitis B recurrence [ P  < 0.0001; RR = 0.38; 95% CI (0.25, 0.58)], YMDD mutant [ P  = 0.002; RR = 0.40; 95% CI (0.23, 0.72)] and hepatitis B recurrence in HBV-DNA positive patients before orthotopic liver transplantation [ P  < 0.00001; RR = 0.31; 95% CI (0.21, 0.45)]. No significant differences were observed in patient survival [ P  = 0.59; RR = 1.02; 95% CI (0.95, 1.09)], graft survival [ P  = 0.56; RR = 1.02; 95% CI (0.95, 1.09)] and diseases leading to death between the two groups [HBV recurrence leading to death: P  = 0.05; RR = 0.47; 95% CI (0.22, 1.02); hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence leading to death: P  = 0.13; RR = 0.34; 95% CI (0.09, 1.36)]. In conclusion, combination of lamivudine and HBIG can effectively decrease the recurrence rate of HBV and the incidence of YMDD mutant, but it can not improve patient survival and graft survival significantly. Well-designed large-sample trials are needed to evaluate the efficiency of combined therapy of lamivudine and HBIG in prophylaxis of HBV recurrence in liver graft recipients.     

Outcome of long-term ribavirin therapy for recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation.

Ribavirin therapy was initiated at a median of 181 days after liver transplantation in 18 patients with persistent elevation of alanine aminotransferase values and biopsy-proven hepatitis, and continued for 23 months (12-44 months). All patients had a prompt biochemical response, with alanine aminotransferase decreasing by 69%; complete normalization occurred in 5 (28%). Serum hepatitis C virus RNA levels did not change during therapy. Liver biopsies obtained after 17 months (9-38 months) of therapy showed no improvement in necroinflammation. However, worsening of fibrosis occurred in 12 patients; and cirrhosis developed in 5 patients (28%), with 3 patients progressing to graft failure. Biopsies from 27 untreated patients who did not fulfill treatment criteria (median follow-up, 38 months) and 4 patients who received 3 months of ribavirin (44 months) showed cirrhosis in 11 and 75%, respectively. Patient and graft survival rates for treated and untreated patients were similar. Although ribavirin improves alanine aminotransferase, it does not prevent the development or progression of fibrosis in patients with recurrent hepatitis C virus.     

Comparison of famciclovir and lamivudine in the long-term treatment of hepatitis B infection after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND: Preliminary results of short-term famciclovir and lamivudine therapy in patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection after liver transplantation revealed promising results. In a retrospective study the efficacy of long-term treatment with these substances was compared. METHODS: A total of 53 HBV-infected adults (48 reinfections and 7 de novo infections) received antiviral treatment. A total of 32 of these patients were treated with famciclovir 3x500 mg, 20 of them were later switched to lamivudine. Fourteen patients received lamivudine, 150 mg/day orally, as first line therapy and 7 patients after failure of famciclovir-prophylaxis. Follow-up time was 8 to 62 months (mean 35 months). Response to therapy (HBV-DNA negative) was compared using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Potential influence factors (HBV-DNA and HBeAg pretransplant, HDV coinfection, pretreatment with famciclovir and immunosuppression) on treatment response were analyzed by log. Rank test (univariate); then a multivariate analysis (Cox multiple stepwise regression model) was applied. RESULTS: A total of 19 and 76% of the patients treated with famciclovir and lamivudine resp. became HBV-DNA negative; 0 and 24% HBsAg negative. Lamivudine was also effective as second line therapy. In a multivariate analysis of all 73 treatment courses, lamivudine treatment and HDV-coinfection were significant factors for better treatment response; regarding only the lamivudine group, negative HBeAg pretransplant was significant. Viral breakthrough after prolonged treatment occurred in 55% (lamivudine) to 80% (famciclovir) of treatment courses but was only accompanied by mild hepatitis. CONCLUSIONS: Lamivudine and famciclovir are potent drugs for the treatment of HBV-infection after liver transplantation. The antiviral capacity of lamivudine is superior even after pretreatment with famciclovir but after prolonged treatment viral breakthrough is often observed.     

Association of lamivudine resistance in recurrent hepatitis B after liver transplantation with advanced hepatic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) in patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is known to be associated with a high recurrence rate and poor prognosis. Lamivudine, a nucleoside analogue, is a potent inhibitor of HBV replication, but it is associated with a 14-39% rate of resistance. METHODS: We report on four patients who underwent OLT for HBV infection. In all cases, the HBV infection recurred in the grafted liver and was treated with lamivudine (100 mg daily) on a compassionate-use basis. The patients were monitored closely for serum liver enzymes, hepatitis B surface antigen and HBV DNA (by hybridization). Liver biopsy was performed before and after lamivudine therapy. HBV DNA was amplified from serum for each patient and sequenced through a conserved polymerase domain, the tyrosine-methionine-aspartate-aspartate (YMDD) locus. RESULTS: All four patients exhibited lamivudine resistance 9-20 months after initiation of the drug. In all patients with a clinically mild disease, liver histology findings (12-24 months after lamivudine therapy) showed progressive fibrosis as compared to biopsies performed before lamivudine therapy, with a significant increase (> or =2 points) in the Knodell score in three patients. Moreover, two patients exhibited worsening of the necroinflammatory process. A mutation at the YMDD motif of the HBV polymerase gene was detected in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: Lamivudine resistance frequently occurs in patients with recurrent HBV infection after OLT and is associated with advanced hepatic fibrosis and necroinflammatory process. A combination of antiviral therapies may be necessary.     

Low-dose hepatitis B immunoglobulin given "on demand" in combination with lamivudine: a highly cost-effective approach to prevent recurrent hepatitis B virus infection in the long-term follow-up after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND: Cost of long-term prophylaxis with high-dose human hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIg) after liver transplantation is extremely high. The aim of the present study was to assess consumption rates of high (5,000 IU) and low (2,000 IU) doses of HBIg given intravenously "on demand", and determine their cost-effectiveness compared with conventional fixed monthly schedules. METHODS: The study included 11 male patients (mean age 53 years) who received transplants for hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related cirrhosis 29 to 96 months earlier, all receiving lamivudine (100 mg/day) prophylaxis. Each patient received three consecutive intravenous infusions of 5,000 IU HBIg, followed by three 2,000 IU infusions. HBIg consumption was assessed by serial measurement of serum hepatitis B surface antibody (HBsAb) titer at 2-week intervals. HBIg was readministered only when HBsAb titers dropped below 70 IU/L (i.e., "on demand"). RESULTS: Mean HBsAb peak titers after high and low HBIg doses were 1,641 +/- 385 and 848 +/- 216 IU/L, respectively (P <0.0001). Mean time to reach an HBsAb titer less than 70 IU/L was 79.5 +/- 38.2 days versus 61.6 +/- 32.1 days, respectively (P =NS). Interindividual variation coefficients were 23 +/- 18% and 32 +/- 26% (5,000 IU and 2,000 IU, respectively). Using the on demand approach, maintenance of a protective anti-HBs titer required an average number of 4.0 (5,000 IU) and 5.6 (2,000 IU) HBIg administrations per year, respectively (P =NS). CONCLUSIONS: Individual HBIg consumption profiles are highly variable. A low-dose (2,000 IU) on demand HBIg administration schedule is highly cost-effective and provides more than 50% savings compared with conventional high-dose monthly schedules.     

Prevention of hepatitis B recurrence after liver transplantation using lamivudine or lamivudine combined with hepatitis B Immunoglobulin prophylaxis.

The aim of our study was to determine the outcomes of liver transplant recipients receiving either lamivudine (LAM) monotherapy or LAM combined with low-dose intramuscular (IM) hepatitis B Immunoglobulin (HBIG) therapy. We performed a retrospective review of the medical records of patients that had had liver transplantation in a single center for HBV-related liver diseases from December 1999 to June 2004. A total of 165 patients received LAM monotherapy (51 patients) or combined prophylaxis (114 patients) post-liver transplantation (LT) with a mean follow-up of 20.13 months. Hepatitis B relapsed in 21 patients of the hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) carriers who received LAM monotherapy, with a 1- and 2-yr actuarial risk of 27.4% and 39.7%. Recurrence occurred in 16 patients of 114 patients receiving the combined prophylaxis, with a 1- and 2-yr recurrence rate of 13.5% and 15.2% (P = 0.024). A total of 25 cases (67.6%) with YMDD mutants were detected in all the 37 patients, 14 cases (66.7%) in the monotherapy group and 11 cases (68.8%) in the combination group. In conclusion, LAM and low-dose intramuscular HBIG treatment demonstrates a better result than LAM monotherapy, as prophylaxis against post-LT reinfection of the graft, but the safety and efficacy as a substitution for high-dose intravenous HBIG with LAM needs to be investigated further.     

Long-term results of hepatitis B immunoglobulin and lamuvidine for hepatitis B prophylaxis after liver transplantation

Purpose

Recurrence of hepatitis B virus after a liver transplantation (OLT) is a risk factor affecting graft and patient survivals. Short-term hepatitis B virus reactivation rates after OLT range between 3% and 15%. Using combination prophylaxis, the outcomes of OLT among patients with liver disease related to hepatitis B virus have improved to levels comparable to those whose disease is not related to hepatitis B virus.

Materials and Methods

Since September 2001, we performed 288 OLT in 282 patients including 74 who had liver failure related to hepatitis B virus among whom 58 were followed for >12 months and analyzed retrospectively. Our protocol included lamivudine (100 mg orally per day beginning the day after surgery) and hepatitis B immunoglobulin (10,000 IU IV during the anhepatic phase, 2000 IU/d IV during the first week after surgery, 2000 IU IV/month from postoperative months 1 to 12). Using our protocol, the anti-hepatitis B surface antibodies (HBsAb) serum titer was maintained up to 100 IU/mL. The female:male ratio was 11:47. The mean age of patients was 43 ± 12.8 years.

Results

Five patients died of causes unrelated to hepatitis B virus. At the time of death, their hepatitis B surface antigens were negative, and serum titers of anti-HBsAb were 45, 35.3, 56.4, 79.6, and 123 IU/mL. Mean follow-up was 46.5 ± 18.9 months (range, 12-79). The hepatitis B surface antigen became positive in 4 patients; the remaining 49 had no evidence of hepatitis B surface antigen. In 18 patients, serum titer of anti-hepatitis B surface antigen was 0; in the remaining 31 patients, it was 69.2 ± 133 IU/mL.

Conclusion

Our combination protocol with hepatitis B immunoglobulin and lamivudine is a safe, cost-saving, and effective treatment for hepatitis B virus prophylaxis after liver transplantation.     

Early and extended therapy for recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation

Background

End-stage cirrhosis due to hepatitis C virus (HCV) is one of the most common indications for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Recurrence is universal and more aggressive than before OLT. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of antiviral therapy in recurrent HCV after OLT. Therapy was started even with mild fibrosis (F < 2) and extended until 72 weeks, if it was possible.

Methods

Between November 2001 and December 2010, 279 OLTs were performed in 262 patients in our hospital; 81 (31%) for HCV-related cirrhosis. Nineteen patients were excluded because they died in the first 6 months. We treated 28 of 62 HVC patients.

Results

Twenty-eight patients met the indication for antiviral therapy: 21 male (75%) and 7 female (25%), with a mean age of 56 years (range, 40 to 68 years). All the patients had histologically proven recurrence liver disease: F1, 19 patients (68%); F2, 4 patients (14%), and F3, 45 patients (18%). The mean time to recurrence was 23 months, with a range of 3 to 90 months. Adverse effects (leukopenia in 82% and anemia in 79%) were treated with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF) and erythropoietin (EPO), and dose reduction. Four patients (14%) were withdrawn from the treatment because of adverse effects. Nineteen patients achieved early virologic response (68%), and the sustained virologic response was 54% (15 of 28 patients). Five patients died (18%).

Conclusion

Improving sustained virologic response in HCV liver transplant patients is a key goal. Antiviral therapy is safe and effective treating HCV recurrence after OLT. Starting this therapy in an early stage of hepatitis C recurrence, extending antiviral therapy (72 weeks), and avoiding dose reduction of antiviral drugs could help to achieve higher rates of sustained virological response.     

核苷类似物联合HBIG干预下肝移植后HBV再感染的危险因素及预后分析

目的 探讨肝移植术后在核苷类似物联合低剂量乙肝免疫球蛋白(HBIG)的干预下乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)再感染的危险因素及其预后.方法 回顾性分析340例因HBV相关性终末期肝病行肝移植患者的临床资料.所有患者术前即开始给予核苷类似物控制病情,术中和术后均给予核苷类似物联合低剂量HBIG的预防方案.术后对患者进行定期随访,监测患者的HBV再感染发生率、存活率及预后.记录患者性别、年龄、原发病、术前2周HBV DNA水平、HbeAg水平、YMDD变异以及术后免疫抑制剂和核苷类似物使用情况等指标进行单因素分析,将P<0.1的变量纳入COX多因素回归分析,筛选出影响术后HBV再感染的危险因素.结果 340例患者术后发生HBV再感染33例,再感染率为9.7%,再感染时间为术后(8.4±13.2)个月(2～49个月),术后1、3、5年再感染率分别为7.0%、10%、13%.33例患者HBV再感染后均停用HBIG,并调整核苷类似物的用量,除3例HBV DNA定量为3 log10～5 log10拷贝/ml外,其余均控制在3 log10拷贝/ml以下.340例患者术后1、3、5年存活率分别为89%、83%和82%,其中HBV再感染者分别为94%,87%,81%,未再感染者分别为89%,82%,82%,Log-rank检验显示HBV再感染对患者长期存活率无明显影响(P=0.828).经COX多因素回归分析表明,原发病为原发性肝癌(P=0.035)、HBVDNA定量>5 log10拷贝/ml(P<0.001)是发生HBV再感染的危险因素.进一步分层分析显示,原发性肝癌复发后HBV再感染发生率显著高于未复发者,分别为27.9%和8.7%(P=0.001).结论 原发病为原发性肝癌及术前HBV DNA>5 log10拷贝/ml是影响HBV再感染的高危因素.在核苷类似物联合HBIG预防方案的干预下,HBV再感染对预后影响不大.     

拉米夫定预防肝移植术后乙型肝炎病毒再感染的研究

目的 探讨和评价拉米夫定预防原位肝移植术后乙型肝炎病毒（HBV）再感染的效果。方法 41例患者，术前诊断为肝炎后肝硬化（失代偿期）者22例，慢性重型肝炎并肝炎后肝硬化（失代偿期）者12例，慢性重型肝炎者7例，其中HBVDNA阳性16例。41例患者均采用背驮式原位肝移植，术前15例给予拉米夫定治疗，术后41例患者均服用拉米夫定。结果 10例患者术后出现HBV再感染，其中9例为YMDD变异毒株感染，术后1、2年的HBV再感染率分别为9．8％（4／41）、24．4％（10／41）。术前血清HBVDNA阴性者术后HBV再感染率（12．0％，3／25）明显低于HBVDNA阳性者（43．8％，7／16）。术前长期服用（超过6个月）拉米夫定者和未服用拉米夫定者术后HBV再感染率分别为66．7％、23．1％，均明显高于术前短期（未超过6个月）服用拉米夫定者（0，P〈0．05）。结论 术前服用拉米夫定可降低乙型肝炎患者肝移植后HBV再感染率，但服药时间不宜超过6个月；长期、单一的应用拉米夫定易导致病毒变异而出现耐药毒株感染。