Rectum resection with colo-anal anastomosis. Results of continence with radical surgery

The long-term clinical and functional results of coloanal anastomosis (CAA) in the management of low and midrectal cancer were analyzed and compared with an age matched group of patients with abdomino-perineal resection (APR). Between 1977 and 1990 85 patients underwent CAA following resection for carcinomas of the mid and low rectum (67 male and 18 female, mean age 57.3 years). In 62 patients the tumor was in the lower and in 23 patients in the middle third of the rectum. A hand-sewn anastomosis was performed in 20 patients, in the 65 most recent patients the anastomosis was performed using a circular stapling instrument. No patient died as a result of pelvic sepsis. Anastomotic leakage occurred in 7% (handsewn 20%, stapled 3%), anastomotic strictures in 2.4%. 9 months after CAA complete or near complete continence was achieved by 85% of the patients. One patient was totally incontinent. More than 3 years postoperatively (1977-1987) 57 patients with curative resection could be analyzed. 39% of the patients had Dukes' A, 31% Dukes' B and 30% Dukes' C lesions. After a mean (+/- SD) length of follow-up of 6.7 years (3-13.6 years) local recurrence cumulative rates were 11% after CAA and 17% after APR, distant recurrence rates were 33% and 34% respectively. According to Dukes' stage the cancer-related 5-years survival of patients after CAA was in Dukes' A stage 88%, in Dukes' B 56%, in Dukes' C 29% and after APR 100, 53, and 22% respectively (p greater than 0.05). From these results we conclude that intersphincteric resection with CAA is a safe and efficient alternative to APR in many distal rectal carcinomas.     

Surgical treatment of lower rectal cancer with sphincter preservation using handsewn coloanal anastomosis

The present study was designed to evaluate the technical feasibility and oncologic results of performing handsewn coloanal anastomosis (CAA). A total of 46 patients treated for lower rectal cancer using CAA were retrospectively studied, and the oncologic results were compared with those of 105 patients treated with abdominoperineal resection (APR). CAA was performed in patients who had both good mobility of the tumor and a distal clearance margin of more than 1.0 cm. No significant difference was noted in the mortality rates following the two operations (CAA 2.2% vs APR 1.9%). Pelvic recurrence was detected in two patients (4.5%) after CAA and in six patients (7.2%) after APR. The 5-year survival rate after CAA was 79.2% and that after APR was 72.6%. No significant difference was noted in the incidence of pelvic recurrence or the survival rates between the two operations. These results show that CAA could be an excellent reconstructive option in the treatment of lower rectal carcinoma for selected patients.     

Oncological outcome of ultra-low coloanal anastomosis with and without intersphincteric resection for low rectal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND: The value of ultra-low coloanal anastomosis (CAA) for rectal cancer is dependent on the oncological and functional results. The aim of this comparative study was to evaluate the long-term oncological outcome of CAA with or without intersphincteric resection (ISR) for low-lying rectal tumours. METHODS: The study population comprised consecutive patients with low rectal cancer who underwent CAA in a single institution between 1977 and 2004. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether or not a partial ISR had been performed. Cox multivariate models were used for survival analysis. RESULTS: Some 278 patients underwent CAA with curative intent; 173 had ISR and 105 had CAA without ISR. Mean follow-up was 66.8 months. The 5-year actuarial rate for local recurrence, regardless of tumour stage, was 10.6 per cent in the ISR group versus 6.7 per cent for CAA alone (P = 0.405), and the 5-year actuarial overall survival rate was 86.1 and 80.0 per cent respectively (P = 0.318). Cox multivariable analysis revealed that resection of the anal canal was not a prognostic factor for local or metastatic recurrence. CONCLUSION: Sphincter-preserving surgery appears to be oncologically adequate for very low-lying rectal tumours.     

Bladder-Sparing Extended Resection of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Involving the Prostate and Seminal Vesicles

Purpose Total pelvic exenteration (TPE) is the standard procedure for locally advanced rectal cancer involving the prostate and seminal vesicles. We evaluated the feasibility of bladder-sparing surgery as an alternative to TPE. Methods Eleven patients with advanced primary or recurrent rectal cancer involving the prostate or seminal vesicles, or both, underwent bladder-sparing extended colorectal resection with radical prostatectomy. The procedures performed were abdominoperineal resection (APR) with prostatectomy (n = 6), colorectal resection using intersphincteric resection combined with prostatectomy (n = 4), and abdominoperineal tumor resection with prostatectomy (n = 1). Local control and urinary and anal function were evaluated postoperatively. Results Cysto-urethral anastomosis (CUA) was performed in seven patients and catheter-cystostomy was performed in four patients. Coloanal or colo-anal canal anastomosis was also performed in four patients. There was no mortality, and the morbidity rate was 38%. All patients underwent complete resection with negative surgical margins. After a median follow-up period of 26 months there was no sign of local recurrence, and ten patients were alive without disease, although distant metastases were found in three patients. Five patients had satisfactory voiding function after CUA, and three had satisfactory evacuation after intersphincteric resection (ISR). Conclusion These bladder-sparing procedures allow conservative surgery to be performed in selected patients with advanced rectal cancer involving the prostate or seminal vesicles, without compromising local control.     

Surgical treatment of adenocarcinoma of the rectum.

OBJECTIVE: The authors' aim was to determine survival and recurrence rates in patients undergoing resection of rectal cancer achieved by abdominoperineal resection (APR), coloanal anastomosis (CAA), and anterior resection (AR) without adjuvant therapy. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The surgery of rectal cancer is controversial; so, too, is its adjuvant management. Questions such as preoperative versus postoperative radiation versus no radiation are key. An approach in which the entire mesorectum is excised has been proposed as yielding low recurrence rates. METHODS: Of 1423 patients with resected rectal cancers, 491 patients were excluded, leaving 932 with a primary adenocarcinoma of the rectum treated at Mayo. Eighty-six percent were resected for cure. Surgery plus adjuvant treatment was performed in 418, surgery alone in 514. These 514 patients are the subject of this review. Among the 514 patients who underwent surgery alone, APR was performed in 169, CAA in 19, AR in 272, and other procedures in 54. Eighty-seven percent of patients were operated on with curative intent. The mean follow-up was 5.6 years; follow-up was complete in 92%. APR and CAA were performed excising the envelope of rectal mesentery posteriorly and the supporting tissues laterally from the sacral promontory to the pelvic floor. AR was performed using an appropriately wide rectal mesentery resection technique if the tumor was high; if the tumor was in the middle or low rectum, all mesentery was resected. The mean distal margin achieved by AR was 3 +/- 2 cm. RESULTS: Mortality was 2% (12 of 514). Anastomotic leaks after AR occurred in 5% (16 of 291) and overall transient urinary retention in 15%. Eleven percent of patients had a wound infection (abdominal and perineal wound, 30-day, purulence, or cellulitis). The local recurrence and 5-year disease-free survival rates were 7% and 78%, respectively, after AR; 6% and 83%, respectively, after CAA; and 4% and 80%, respectively, after APR. Patients with stage III disease, had a 60% disease-free survival rate. CONCLUSIONS: Complete resection of the envelope of supporting tissues about the rectum during APR, CAA, and AR when tumors were low in the rectum is associated with low mortality, low morbidity, low local recurrence, and good 5-year survival rates. Appropriate "tumor-specific" mesorectal excision during AR when the tumor is high in the rectum is likewise consistent with a low rate of local recurrence and good long-term survival. However, the overall failure rate of 40% in stage III disease (which is independent of surgical technique) means that surgical approaches alone are not sufficient to achieve better long-term survival rates.     

Long-term outcome of per anum intersphincteric rectal dissection with direct coloanal anastomosis for lower rectal cancer

OBJECTIVE: The authors have performed per anum intersphincteric rectal dissection. With direct coloanal anastomosis for cases of lower rectal cancer in which the distal surgical margin is difficult to secure by the double stapling technique. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcome and to clarify the surgical indications for this operation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1993 and 2002, 31 patients underwent per anum intersphincteric rectal dissection with direct coloanal anastomosis. Of these, two patients (one stage 0 and one stage IV) were excluded from the analysis of oncological outcome. The remaining 29 patients formed the basis of this study. The median follow-up was 57 months (range 6-106 months). RESULTS: Local recurrence and distant metastasis developed in 9 and 3 patients, respectively. Local recurrence rate for pT1 was significantly lower than that for pT2/T3 disease. The local recurrence rate cases with tumours less than 3 cm was significantly lower than that for tumours sized 3 cm or more. The distant metastasis rate for cases with lymph node metastasis was significantly higher than that for cases without lymph node metastasis. There was an association between distant metastasis and TNM or pT stage. The overall survival rates for stage I, II and III were 85%, 80% and 89%, respectively. No significant difference was seen in total Cleveland Clinic incontinence score between per anum intersphincteric rectal dissection with direct coloanal anastomosis and the double stapling technique. CONCLUSION: The surgical indications of this operation should be limited to patients with T1 rectal cancer or tumours less than 3 cm.     

Sphincter-preserving surgery: per anal coloanal anastomosis

Since the introduction of the stapling technique, sphincter-preserving surgery for treatment of rectosigmoid and upper rectum carcinoma has been widely performed in the view of its radicality and postoperative quality of life. Sphincter preservation is still controversial in carcinoma of the lower rectum. Since we introduced per anal coloanal anastomosis (PAA) in 1980 and per anal intersphincteric dissection and coloanal anastomosis (PIDCA) in 1993 for the treatment of lower rectal carcinoma, the sphincter has been preserved in 78.7% of patients. There was no significant difference in the 5-year survival rate between patients in whom the sphincter was preserved and those who underwent abdominoperineal resection during the same period. PAA and PIDCA are safe when anastomosis must be performed at the dentate line. They are the best sphincter-preserving techniques for lower rectal carcinoma and do not result in serious postoperative dysfunction.     

Long-Term Survival and Recurrence Outcomes Following Surgery for Distal Rectal Cancer

Background

Treatment of distal rectal cancer remains clinically challenging and includes proctectomy and coloanal anastomosis (CAA) or abdominoperineal resection (APR). The purpose of this study is to evaluate operative and pathologic factors associated with long-term survival and local recurrence outcomes in patients treated for distal rectal cancer.

Methods

A retrospective consecutive cohort study of 304 patients treated for distal rectal cancer with radical resection from 1993 to 2003 was performed. Patients were grouped by procedure (CAA or APR). Demographic, pathologic, recurrence, and survival data were analyzed utilizing chi-square analysis for comparison of proportions. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test for univariate and Cox regression for multivariate comparison.

Results

The median tumor distance from the anal verge was 2 cm [interquartile range (IQR) 0.5–4 cm]. Margins were negative in all but four patients (one distal, 0.3%; three radial, 1%). The 5-year overall survival rate was 82% (88.6% stage pI, 80.5% stage pII, 67.9% stage pIII). Older age, advanced pathologic stage, presence of lymphovascular or perineural invasion, earlier treatment period, and APR surgery type were associated with worse survival on multivariate analysis. The 5-year local recurrence rate was 5.3% after CAA and 7.9% after APR (p = 0.33).

Conclusions

Low rates of local recurrence and good overall survival can be achieved after treatment of distal rectal cancer with stage-appropriate chemoradiation and proctectomy with CAA or APR. Sphincter preservation can be achieved even with distal margins less than 2 cm.     

External Coloanal Anastomosis Without Covering Stoma in Low-Lying Rectal Cancer

The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and functional outcome of external coloanal anastomosis without covering stoma in treating low-lying rectal cancer. All patients undergoing the coloanal anastomosis for low lying rectal carcer in the Department of General Surgery, Minia University Hospital, between May 2006 and May 2009 were included. Seventy two patients underwent coloanal anastomosis, and follow up was available for all patients. Mean follow up period was 12.6 ± 4.7 months. Postoperatively, fecal continence was normal in 84.7% of patients. Postoperative complications included anastomotic fistula in 3 patients (4.2%) and anastomotic stenosis in 6 patients (8.3%). There was no effect of pre or postoperative adjuvant therapy on the procedure outcome. There was no local recurrence during follow up period. Three patients died at the end of follow up period due to distant metastasis. In treatment of low-lying rectal cancer, abdominoperineal resection should be avoided if coloanal anastomosis provides similar control of the disease as it is safe and has good functional results and acceptable complication rate.     

Comparison of colonic J-pouch reconstruction and straight coloanal anastomosis after intersphincteric rectal resection

The tendency towards sphincter-preserving resection for distal rectal cancers has led to the technique of straight coloanal anastomosis (CAA) and colonic J-pouch anal anastomosis (CPA) after low anterior resection. The aim of the present study was to compare complication rate, anorectal physiology and functional results after both types of reconstruction after ultra-low intersphincteric resection. A total of 31 patients who had undergone CPA were followed up prospectively using anorectal manometry and a standardised questionnaire and were compared with 63 patients who had undergone CAA and were followed up in the same way. The complication rate after CPA did not differ significantly from that after CAA. One year postoperatively, the median stool frequency and urgency were reduced after CPA (1.7+/-2.2/day; 7% vs. 2.4+/-3.6/day; 14%; P<0.05). Three months after colostomy/ileostomy closure, the maximum tolerable volume, threshold volume and compliance were decreased after CAA when compared with CPA (55+/-12, 34+/-12, and 3.9+/-0.3 ml/mmHg vs. 85+/-21, 53+/-11 and 6.2 ml/mmHg, respectively; P<0.05). Anal manometry revealed no significant differences in the anal resting and squeeze pressure. One year postoperatively, continence also did not differ significantly between CPA and CAA. Colonic J-pouch reconstruction seems to be superior to the straight coloanal anastomosis, especially during the first postoperative year. In view of the often poor prognosis of the patients, it is the reconstruction of choice after ultra-low resections of the rectum.     

Direct and reservoir colonic-anal anastomoses. Short and long term results

STUDY AIM: This retrospective study was designed to assess the operative, oncologic and functional results of total proctectomy with coloanal anastomosis (CAA). PATIENTS AND METHOD: Between 1990 and 1994, 81 patients (44 males/37 females: mean age: 59 years) were operated for a cancer (n = 67) or a benign lesion (n = 14) of the rectum. Sixty-four patients had a straight CAA and 17 patients had a colonic J-pouch. RESULTS: There was no operative mortality. Two patients were reoperated for colonic necrosis and underwent abdominoperineal resection. An anastomotic leak was observed in 11 patients and its severity was decreased by a diverting stoma. An anastomotic stricture was observed in 10 patients. Of the 67 patients with cancer, 19 (28%) developed metastases and 11 (16%) developed local recurrence. The 5-year survival rate was 69%. Twelve months after the operation, continence was similar with the two types of CAA, but the mean daily stool frequency was lower in patients with a reservoir. With a long follow-up (mean = 9 years), functional results were good with regard to continence and stool frequency, almost similar with the two types of CAA; functional disorders (noctumal stools, fragmentation, urgency) were reported by 25 to 40% of patients. CONCLUSION: Total proctectomy with coloanal anastomosis yields good oncologic results. With regard to functional results, the superiority of the colonic J-pouch, which is observed in the first postoperative year, was lost beyond this period; long-term results are good for continence and stool frequency, but some disorders persist in a significant proportion of patients.     

Treatment of rectal cancer by low anterior resection with coloanal anastomosis.

OBJECTIVE: Our institution's experience with low anterior resection in combination with coloanal anastomosis (LAR/CAA) for primary rectal cancer was reviewed (1) to determine cancer treatment results, 2) to identify risk factors for pelvic recurrence, and 3) to assess the long-term success of sphincter preservation. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Use of sphincter-preserving resection for mid-rectal and selected distal-rectal cancers continues to increase. As surgical techniques and adjuvant therapy evolve, treatment results must be carefully assessed. METHODS: One hundred thirty-four patients treated for primary rectal cancer by LAR/CAA between 1977 and 1990 were studied retrospectively. All pathologic slides were reviewed. Median follow-up was 4 years. RESULTS: Actuarial 5-year survival for all patients was 73%. Among 36 patients who relapsed, distant metastatic disease had developed at the time of first clinical relapse in most (86%). Pelvic recurrence was detected in 13 patients, an actuarial rate of 11% at 5 years. Mesenteric implants, positive microscopic resection margin, T3 tumor, perineural invasion, blood vessel invasion, and high tumor grade were associated with increased risk for pelvic recurrence. Eleven patients ultimately required permanent colostomy, and in eight instances the cause was pelvic recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Low anterior resection combined with coloanal anastomosis provides good treatment for mid-rectal cancers and for some distal rectal cancers. Pelvic recurrence is not associated with short distal resection margins but is correlated with the presence of histopathologic markers of aggressive disease in the primary tumor. Long-term preservation of anal sphincter function depends primarily on control of pelvic tumor and can be achieved in more than 90% of patients.     

Quality of life after coloanal anastomosis and abdominoperineal resection for distal rectal cancers: sphincter preservation vs quality of life

Aim A permanent colostomy is considered to have an adverse impact on quality of life (QOL). However, functional outcomes following sphincter preservation also affect QOL. Our aim was to determine differences in QOL of patients undergoing coloanal anastomosis (CAA) or abdominoperineal resection (APR) for distal rectal cancer. Method Eighty‐five patients underwent CAA (72 with intestinal continuity and 13 with a stoma because of complications) and 83 patients underwent APR for a distal rectal cancer between 1995 and 2001 at a single institution and responded to our survey. QOL was evaluated using the EORTC QLQ‐C30 and QLQ‐CR38. Results Patients with CAA were younger than APR patients (mean age 57 vs 62 years, P < 0.001), but gender distribution, tumour stage and proportion of subjects receiving radiotherapy was not significantly different. Patients undergoing CAA had higher scores (better QOL) for physical functioning; lower scores (fewer symptoms) for fatigue, pain, financial difficulties, weight loss and chemotherapy side effects; and higher scores (more symptoms) for constipation and gastrointestinal symptoms compared with APR patients. CAA patients had higher scores (better QOL) for body image in men but not in women. Sexual functioning scores in men and women were lower (worse QOL) in CAA patients compared with APR patients. Conclusions QOL after APR is comparable to sphincter preservation, although there are some differences that need to be considered. QOL and functional results should be taken into account with the oncological outcome when devising management strategy for distal rectal cancer.     

Outcome analysis of external coloanal anastomosis.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of treating low-lying rectal lesions with resection and primary repair using a pull-through technique with rectal stump eversion and external coloanal anastomosis with immediate reintroduction into the pelvis. METHODS: All coloanal anastomoses with the above technique on the Gastrointestinal Surgery Service at the University of Pittsburgh from March 1990 to September 1995 were evaluated. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients underwent coloanal anastomoses with the above technique, and follow-up was available for 96% (50 of 52) of patients. Rectal lesions in the 50 patients included cancer (n = 34), rectal adenomas (n = 13), and other lesions (n = 3). Mean follow-up period was 29.6 +/- 21.8 months (28.5 months for patients with carcinoma). Fecal continence was normal or good in 88% (44 of 50) of patients. Moderate or complete incontinence was present in 12% (6 of 50) of patients. The local recurrence rate of rectal cancer was 0%. Morbidity occurred in 22% (11 of 50) of patients. Survival was 90% (45 of 50 patients). CONCLUSIONS: Coloanal anastomosis with this technique provides effective treatment for low-lying malignant or benign rectal lesions and has an acceptable complication rate.     

Clinical and Functional Comparison Between Stapled Colonic J-Pouch Low Rectal Anastomosis and Hand-Sewn Colonic J-Pouch Anal Anastomosis for Very Low Rectal Cancer

Purpose. We investigated intersphincteric resection with hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis, which may be an alternative to standard low anterior resection for very low rectal cancer when stapled anastomosis is technically impossible. Methods. The present study compared the clinical and functional results of 16 patients who underwent stapled colonic J-pouch low rectal anastomosis (CJLRA) with those of 15 patients who underwent intersphincteric excision and hand-sewn colonic J-pouch anal anastomosis (CJAA). Results. After a median follow-up period of 59 months, local recurrence was found in four patients from the CJAA group, three of whom subsequently underwent curative abdominoperineal resection. Defecatory function 6 and 12 months after surgery did not differ between the groups, although pads were used significantly more frequently in the CJAA group. Anorectal physiologic study before and 12 months after surgery revealed that the internal anal sphincter function was impaired to a larger extent after CJAA than after CJLRA, probably due to the partial or subtotal resection of the internal sphincter, and the anal dilatation during resection and anastomosis. Conclusion. Although the prevention of intraoperative tumor implantation and the early detection of local recurrence is of utmost importance, CJAA may be an acceptable sphincter-preserving procedure for selected patients in whom stapled anastomosis is impossible. Received: February 26, 2001 / Accepted: September 11, 2001     

Intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: laparoscopic vs open surgery approach

Aim Laparoscopic sphincter‐saving surgery has been investigated for rectal cancer but not for tumours of the lower third. We evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Method From 1990 to 2007, patients with rectal tumour below 6 cm from the anal verge and treated by open or laparoscopic curative intersphincteric resection were included in a retrospective comparative study. Surgery included total mesorectal excision with internal sphincter excision and protected low coloanal anastomosis. Neoadjuvant treatment was given to patients with T3 or N+ tumours. Recurrence and survival were evaluated by the Kaplan–Meier method and compared using the Logrank test. Function was assessed using the Wexner continence score. Results Intersphincteric resection was performed in 175 patients with low rectal cancer: 110 had laparoscopy and 65 had open surgery. The two groups were similar according to age, sex, body mass index, ASA score, tumour stage and preoperative radiotherapy. Postoperative mortality (zero) and morbidity (23%vs 28%; P = 0.410) were similar in both groups. There was no difference in 5‐year local recurrence (5%vs 2%; P = 0.349) and 5‐year disease‐free survival (70%vs 71%; P = 0.862). Function and continence scores (11 vs 12; P = 0.675) were similar in both groups. Conclusion Intersphincteric resection did not alter long‐term tumour control of low rectal cancer. The safety and efficacy of the laparoscopic approach for intersphincteric resection are suggested by a similar short‐ and long‐term outcome as obtained by open surgery.     

Impact of total mesorectal excision on the results of surgery of distal rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: This study reviewed the results of surgery for distal rectal cancer (tumours within 6 cm of the anal verge) following the introduction of total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer in one institution. METHODS: Two hundred and five patients who had undergone surgical resection of rectal cancer within 6 cm of the anal verge were included. The demographic, operative and follow-up data were collected prospectively. Comparisons were made between patients who had different surgical procedures. RESULTS: Abdominoperineal resection (APR) was performed in 27.8 per cent of patients, falling from 36.0 per cent in the first 3 years to 20.0 per cent in the last 3 years of the study. The overall operative mortality rate was 1.5 per cent and the morbidity rate 30.2 per cent. With a mean follow-up of 36 months, local recurrence occurred in 28 of the 185 patients who had curative resection. The 5-year actuarial local recurrence rates for double-stapled anastomosis, peranal coloanal anastomosis and APR were 11.2, 34.6 and 23.5 per cent respectively. The local recurrence rate was significantly lower for double-stapled low anterior resection than for the other types of operation. The overall 5-year survival rate in patients with low anterior resection and APR was 69.1 and 51.1 per cent respectively (P = 0.12). CONCLUSION: With the practice of total mesorectal excision, APR was necessary in only 27.8 per cent of patients with rectal cancer within 6 cm of the anal verge. The local recurrence rate was much lower in patients with double-stapled low anterior resection than in those treated with APR or peranal anastomosis.     

Role of intersphincter resection among the surgical options for cancer of the distal rectum

The surgical treatment of low rectal cancer has yet to be standardised. The aims of the study were to define the curative role of intersphincteric resection and to evaluate its indications and functional results through a retrospective clinical experience. From 1988 to 2000, out of 783 operations for primary rectal cancers (resectability rate 96%; restorative resections 83% and APR 10%) an intersphincteric resection was performed in 48 patients (31 male, 17 female, average age 62) for tumours located at a mean distance of 4.5 cm from the anal verge. Clinical stage: 27 T3 (56.3%), 12 T2, 5 T4 and 4 T1. All the operations were rated R0. TME with N-S, endo-anal distal transection and manual colo-anal anastomosis with a protective stoma were systematically performed. The mean follow-up was 46 months (range: 12-80). Functional results were evaluated with a prospective standardised questionnaire. There was no hospital mortality (30 days). The total morbidity rate was 22% with anastomotic leakage (clinical or X-ray evidence) in 12.5%. Four anal stenoses needed dilatation. Only one local recurrence six years after operation (2.1%). Nine patients died of systemic metastases within 3 years of surgery; the others are still alive and disease-free. Minor faecal incontinence with frequency and urgency occurred in 68.7% of cases at 3 months after protective stoma closure and in 37.5% after 6 months. After one year continence was good in 85.4% of survivors. Only one case required a permanent stoma for poststenotic total incontinence. The best functional results were achieved by colonic pouch reconstruction. For selected low rectal cancers (T2/T3) without voluntary sphincter infiltration, intersphincteric resection is safe and effective for oncological and functional purposes. The procedure requires accuracy in dissecting the anorectal junction. Preoperative radiotherapy may increase the indications for intersphincteric resection as well as the availability of a disease-free margin. A manual colo-anal anastomosis with colonic pouch interposition is strongly recommended.     

Robotic versus laparoscopic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for rectal cancer

Robotic surgery is increasingly used in the field of rectal cancer surgery. This study aimed to compare the short- and long-term outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic ultralow anterior resection (uLAR) and coloanal anastomosis (CAA). Between January 2007 and December 2010, a retrospective chart review was performed for all patients with low rectal cancer who underwent curative uLAR and CAA with or without intersphincteric resection using either a robotic or a laparoscopic approach. The study excluded patients with tumors invading the levator ani or external sphincter, patients with T4 cancers invading the prostate or vagina, and patients for whom an open approach was used. Patients’ short- and long-term outcomes were evaluated. This study enrolled 84 consecutive patients (47 in the robotic group and 37 in the laparoscopic group). The patient characteristics and operative data did not differ significantly between the groups except for the rate of conversion to open surgery (robot, 2.1 % vs laparoscopy, 16.2 %; p = 0.02). The postoperative outcomes also were similar in the two groups, but the hospital stay was shorter in the robotic group than in the laparoscopic group (robot, 9 days vs laparoscopy, 11 days; p = 0.011). No postoperative mortality occurred. The median follow-up period was 31.5 months. No difference was shown in local recurrence, 3-year overall survival, or disease-free survival between the two groups. Robotic uLAR and CAA with or without ISR is a safe and feasible surgical approach with a lower conversion rate, a shorter hospital stay, and similar oncologic outcomes compared with a laparoscopic approach. Further prospective and case–control cohort studies with longer follow-up periods are required.     

Magnetic resonance imaging predicts sphincter invasion of low rectal cancer and influences selection of operation

BACKGROUND: With the development of numerous sphincter-saving surgical techniques in the last 2 decades, the indication for abdominoperineal resection in radical-elective operations has been markedly reduced. The preoperative assessment of the extent of local tumor growth is essential for the planning of the optimal surgical procedure. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) proved to be a reliable method for local staging of low rectal carcinoma. The objective of this study was to determine the frequency of sphincter invasion in an unselected population with low rectal cancer. METHODS: From 1997 to 1999, 40 patients with histologically verified adenocarcinoma of the lower rectum (+/-5 cm above the linea dentata) without evidence of metastases underwent a MRI with a body coil (no anal endocoil). The MRI results were compared with the operative situs and with pathohistologic findings. RESULTS: An infiltration of the sphincter ani internus was observed in 11 cases (28%), and a combined infiltration of the sphincter ani internus and externus was found in 2 patients (5%). The median distance of the lower tumor edge to the upper border of the anal canal was 2.0 cm (range, 0-4.5 cm). No infiltration of the external sphincter was observed in patients with cancers above the anal canal. Nine patients (22%) were treated with intersphincteric resection and coloanal anastomosis, 12 (30%) with ultralow resection, and 11 (28%) with low anterior resection of the rectum in conjunction with coloanal anastomosis or a stapled anastomosis. Eight (17%) of the patients were treated with abdominoperineal resection. CONCLUSION: An infiltration of the internal sphincter occurs only in 28% of low rectal cancers; an infiltration of the external anal sphincter is extremely rare and occurred only in patients with cancers located in the anal canal. Pelvic MRI offers a precise preoperative visualization of sphincter infiltration in patients with low rectal cancers and is therefore a valuable tool for planning of rectal surgery.