Traumatic pancreatic duct injury in children: minimally invasive approach to management

Background

The management of children with main pancreatic duct injuries is controversial. We report a series of patients with pancreatic trauma who were treated using minimally invasive techniques.

Methods

Retrospective review of children with pancreatic trauma treated at a UK tertiary referral institution between 1999 and 2004.

Results

Fifteen children (11 boys) were admitted with pancreatic trauma. Twelve (80%) were less than 50th centile for body weight. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scans were used to define organ injury, supplemented by magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in 7. Twelve (80%) underwent diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with a median time after injury of 11 (range, 6-29) days. The degree of pancreatic injury was defined by ERCP and CT/MRCP as grade II (n = 2), grade III (n = 4), grade IV (n = 9) (American Association for the Surgery of Trauma grades). Nine children had a transductal pancreatic stent inserted endoscopically. Computed tomography/ultrasound-guided drainage was performed in 4 children for acute fluid collections. Two children later underwent endoscopic cyst-gastrostomy, one of whom later required conversion to an open cyst-gastrostomy.

Conclusion

Body habitus may predispose to pancreatic duct trauma. Contrast-enhanced CT scan (and MRCP) should dictate the need for ERCP. Transductal pancreatic stenting allows internal drainage of peripancreatic collections and may reestablish duct continuity, although a proportion still requires percutaneous or endoscopic cyst-gastrostomy drainage. Open surgery for pancreatic trauma should now be an exception.     

Operative vs nonoperative management of blunt pancreatic trauma in children

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of nonoperative vs operative management of blunt pancreatic trauma in children.

Methods

Retrospective review of pancreatic injuries from 1995 to 2006 at an urban level I regional pediatric trauma center.

Results

Forty-three children with pancreatic injury were included in the analysis. Injuries included grade I (n = 18), grade II (n = 6), grade III (n = 17), and grade IV (n = 2). For grade II to IV injuries, patients managed operatively (n = 14) and nonoperatively (n = 11) had similar lengths of stay and rates of readmission, despite increased pancreatic complications (PCs) in the nonoperative cohort (21% vs 73%; P = .02). There was a trend toward increased non-PCs in patients managed with resection (P = .07). Twelve patients underwent successful diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in which duct injury was identified. In this group, nonoperative management was pursued in 6 patients but was associated with increased rates of PC (86% nonoperative vs 29% operative; P = .02).

Conclusions

Operative management of children with grades II to IV pancreatic injury results in significantly decreased rates of PCs but fails to decrease length of stay in the hospital, possibly as a result of non-PCs. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography may serve as a useful diagnostic modality for guiding operative vs nonoperative management decisions.     

闭合性胰腺损伤的诊断和手术治疗分析

目的探讨闭合性胰腺损伤的诊断和手术治疗体会。方法回顾性分析我科收治的闭合性胰腺损伤36例临床资料。结果本组病例超声确诊11例,CT确诊23例,腹腔穿刺确诊20例。本组病例均行手术治疗,胰漏6例,腹腔出血2例,胆漏1例,腹腔感染2例。全组死亡4例,死亡原因主要为多器官功能衰竭。结论胰腺损伤的诊断首选B超、CT检查。根据胰腺损伤的程度,选择合理的手术方式,有效的手术方案和术后通畅的引流可提高治愈率,降低病死率。主胰管损伤的识别和定位是治疗成功的关键。     

Long-term results of endoscopic stent in the management of blunt major pancreatic duct injury

Background Pancreatic stents can be used to treat a variety of acute and chronic pancreatic lesions. Sporadic successful trials in trauma patients have been reported. To our knowledge, however, a series with long-term follow-up has not previously been reported. We treated six patients in a 6-year period and report the long-term results. Methods From February 1999 to February 2005, six blunt-trauma patients with major pancreatic duct disruption were treated with pancreatic duct stent at a single trauma center. Assessment of injury severity and diagnosis were based on abdominal computed tomography (CT) and proved by endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP), with chart review used to establish mechanism of injury, timing of ERP, and stent placement, as well as the long-term outcome. Results Three of the six injuries were classified AAST grade III and three were grade IV; the interval to ERP with stent placement ranged from 8 hours to 22 days after the injury. One patient developed sepsis and died. One patient’s stent could be removed early (52 days post-stenting) with mild ductal stricture, whereas the other four were complicated by severe ductal stricture that required repeated and prolonged stenting treatment. Removal of the stents was only possible in three of these four cases (at 12, 19, and 39 months, respectively), with stent dislodgment in the pancreatic duct occurring in another. Conclusions Stent therapy may avoid surgery in the acute trauma stage, and may be preserved as another choice for acute grade IV pancreatic injury. However, variant outcome and long-term ductal stricture reveal that the role of pancreatic duct stent is uncertain and may not be suitable for acute grade III pancreatic injury. However, it needs more clinical data to define the value in the acute blunt pancreatic duct injury.     

Comparative analysis of clinical outcomes for laparoscopic distal pancreatic resection and open distal pancreatic resection at a single institution

Background  Despite recent advances in laparoscopic pancreatic surgery, few studies have compared laparoscopic distal pancreatic resection (LDPR) with open distal pancreatic resection (ODPR). This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes for LDPR and ODPR performed at a single institution. Methods  For this study, 93 patients with benign pancreatic disease underwent LDPR, and 35 patients with benign pancreatic disease underwent ODPR. Patient demographic characteristics, operative times, perioperative complications, length of hospital stay, and return to normal diet were compared retrospectively between the two groups. Results  The LDPR and ODPR groups had the same demographic characteristics. The median operative time was 195 min in the LDPR group and 190 min in the ODPR group (p > 0.05). The rate of spleen preservation was higher in the LDPR group (40.8%) than in the ODPR group (5.7%) (p < 0.05) No operative mortality occurred in either group. The overall complication rate was 24.7% in the LDPR group and 29% in the ODPR group (p > 0.05). The rate of pancreas-related complications was 11.8% in the LDPR group and 17.2% in the ODPR group (p > 0.05). Pancreatic fistula developed in 8.6% of the LDPR group and in 14.3% of the ODPR group (p > 0.05). Bowel movement return to normal and resumption of normal diet were achieved 2.8 ± 1.3 days after the operation in the LDPR group and 4.5 ± 1.6 days after the operation in the ODPR group (p < 0.05). The median duration of hospital stay was 10 days for the LDPR group, which was significantly shorter than the 16 days for the ODPR group (p < 0.01). Conclusion  The use of LDPR for benign lesions of the distal pancreas is feasible and safe. The LDPR procedure is associated with operative times and complication rates similar to those for ODPR, but LDPR has the advantages of an earlier return to normal bowel movements and normal diet and shorter hospital stays than ODPR. To be presented at the 2008 Society of American Gastroinestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Meeting.     

钝性胰腺损伤合并主胰管损伤的诊断和治疗:附35例报告

目的探讨钝性胰腺损伤合并主胰管损伤的早期诊断和合理的外科治疗方法。方法回顾性分析1995年4月至2005年4月间35例胰腺钝性伤病人的临床资料，其早期诊断和损伤严重度的分级根据术前动态的淀粉酶及影像学检查（特别是动态螺旋CT和MRCP扫描）和早期外科手术的术中发现，就胰腺钝性伤的早期诊断方法、不同的手术处理方式及并发症等进行分析。结果22例Ⅲ级胰腺损伤病人中，14例行远端胰腺切除术和脾切除术，6例行远端胰腺切除术和保留脾脏手术，2例行单纯胰周引流术。8例Ⅳ级胰腺损伤病人中，2例行远端胰腺切除术和脾切除术，2例行胰尾切除术，4例行胰腺空肠Roux-en-Y吻合术。5例Ⅴ级胰腺损伤病人中，4例由于复合伤情较重且合并十二指肠损伤，根据伤害严重度（injury severity score，ISS）评分，首先应用损伤控制手术先进行止血和制止肠内容物的外溢、胰腺外引流等简化手术，于急诊ICU监护待血液动力学稳定后，于受伤后48-72h再次行彻底性手术，1例胰头严重毁损伤行Whipple手术，平均住院时间是40d（2～147d），总死亡率是14．3％（35例中5例），其余均治愈。结论对胰腺损伤病人，及时正确的诊断和合理的外科手术治疗是减少死亡率，改善预后的重要因素。     

Spleen preserving distal pancreatectomy in an isolated blunt pancreatic trauma

Blunt isolated pancreatic trauma is uncommon,accounting for 1%-4% of high impact abdominal injuries.In addition,its diagnosis can be difficult;physical signs may be poor and laboratory findings nonspecific,resulting in delayed treatment.Preserving the spleen during distal pancreatectomy (DP) is controversial.One of the spleen’s functions regards immunity;complications following splenectomy include leukocytosis,thrombocytosis,overwhelming post splenectomy sepsis and some degree of immunodeficiency.This is why many authors favor its preservation.We describe a case of a young man with an isolated pancreatic trauma due to a blunt abdominal trauma with a delayed presentation who was treated with spleen-preserving DP and we discuss the value of this procedure with reference to the literature.     

Endoscopic management of pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy and enucleation

Background

Preoperative endoscopic pancreatic sphincterotomy (EPS) has been proposed to prevent postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after distal pancreatectomy (DP) or enucleation (EN). The use of EPS as a curative treatment for POPF has been scarcely reported. We reported 10 consecutive patients who were successfully treated by EPS for a prolonged POPF.

Study design

Ten patients underwent EPS for prolonged POPF (median duration = 40 days, range 20-114; median daily output = 80 mL, range 50-250) after 6 DPs, 2 ENs, and 2 medial pancreatectomies.

Results

EPS was performed in all patients, with stent insertion in 4. No patient developed a specific complication because of EPS. POPF healed within a median delay of 4 days (range 1-12). One patient underwent a repeated endoscopy to treat stent malposition. The median delay of discharge after EPS was 13 days (range 8-15). With a 20-month median follow up, 1 patient developed early transient POPF recurrence because of spontaneous stent migration.

Conclusions

EPS is indicated for prolonged POPF after DP or EN because it is highly feasible, shortens healing, and is well tolerated.     

胰管结石的分型和治疗

Objective To explore the classification and surgical management of pancreatic duct stones.Methods The clinical data of 54 patients with pancreatic duct stones who were admitted to the People's Hospital of Hunan Province from June 1994 to November 2009 were retrospectively analyzed. Stones were found in the head of the pancreas (type Ⅰ ) in 31 patients, in the body and tail of the pancreas (type Ⅱ ) in 7 patients, and in all the pancreas (type Ⅲ ) in 16 patients. According to the types of the pancreatic duct stones, ten patients (6 with type Ⅰ , two with type Ⅱ and two with type Ⅲ pancreatic duct stones) received opening of the main pancreatic duct + pancreaticojejunostomy or pancreaticogastrostomy ( group A). Twenty-four patients ( 16 with type Ⅰ and eight with type Ⅲ pancreatic duct stones) received pancreaticoduodenectomy (group B). Fifteen patients (nine with type Ⅰ and six with type Ⅱ pancreatic duct stones) received subtotal resection of pancreatic head preserving duodenum (group C). Five patients with type Ⅱ pancreatic duct stones received resection of the body and tail of the pancreas and the spleen (group D). All data were analyzed using the t test. Results The mean operation time, blood loss, length of postoperative stay and hospital charges of group A were (2.2 ± 1.2)hours,( 127 ±24)ml,( 11.4 ±4.3) days and (3.24 ± 1.15 ) × 104 yuan, respectively. Five out of nine patients who were followed up had stone recurrence. The mean operation time, blood loss, length of postoperative stay and hospital charges of group B were (7.6 ± 1.1 ) hours, (409 ± 37 ) ml, ( 18.9 ± 2.5 ) days and (7.93 ± 1.35 ) × 104 yuan, respectively.No stone recurrence was detected in the 21 patients who were followed up. The mean operation time, blood loss,length of postoperative stay and hospital charges of group C were (4. 1 ± 0.7 ) hours, ( 156 ± 63 ) ml, ( 10.3 ±2.1 )days and (4. 12 ± 1.22) × 104 yuan, respectively. No stone recurrence was detected in the 15 patients who were followed up. The mean operation time, blood loss, length of postoperative stay and hospital charges of group D were (3.3 ± 1.4) hours, ( 185 ± 36 ) ml, ( 9.3 ± 2.0) days and ( 3.22 ± 1.05 ) × 104 yuan, respectively. No complication was detected after the operation, and no stone recurrence was detected in the three patients who were followed up. There were significant differences in the mean operation time, blood loss, length of postoperative stay and hospital charges between patients with type Ⅰ and Ⅲ pancreatic duct stones who received pancreaticoduodenectomy and subtotal resection of pancreatic head preserving duodenum (t = 12. 143, 14. 099, 11. 550, 9. 103,P < 0.05 ). Conclusions Classification of the pancreatic duct stones is important for choosing the proper surgical procedure. Subtotal resection of pancreatic head preserving duodenum is ideal for the treatment of patients with type Ⅰ or Ⅱ pancreatic duct stones.     

Traumatic bile leaks from blunt liver injury in children: A multidisciplinary and minimally invasive approach to management

Background

Selective non-operative management (NOM) of hemodynamically stable pediatric patients with blunt hepatic trauma is the standard of care. Traumatic bile leaks (TBL) are a potential complication following liver injury. The use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the diagnosis and treatment of TBL is described in adults, but limited in the pediatric literature. We report our experience with a multidisciplinary and minimally invasive approach to the management of TBL.

Methods

This was an IRB-approved 13-year retrospective review (January 1999-December 2012) of an institutional pediatric trauma registry; 294 patients (≤ 17 years old) sustained blunt hepatic injury. Those with TBL were identified. Patient demographics, mechanism of injury, management strategy and outcomes were reviewed.

Results

Eleven patients were identified with TBL. Hepatobiliary iminodiacetic scan (HIDA) was diagnostic. Combinations of peri-hepatic drain placement, ERCP with biliary stenting and/or sphincterotomy were performed with successful resolution of TBL in all cases. No child required surgical repair or reconstruction of the leak. Cholangitis developed in one child. There were no long-term complications.

Conclusions

A multidisciplinary and minimally invasive approach employing peri-hepatic external drainage catheters and ERCP with sphincterotomy and stenting of the ampulla is a safe and effective management strategy for TBL in children.     

Challenges in management of an isolated intrapancreatic Common Bile Duct injury in an abdominal trauma

IntroductionBiliary tract injuries are rare following abdominal trauma. If detected late, outcome is less favourable. It adds to morbidity if there is involvement of head of pancreas or duodenal wall.Case reportWe present a case of an adult male with sharp and blunt trauma over the right side of the abdomen with omentum protruding out. Exploratory laparotomy revealed non expanding paraduodenal hematoma without evidence of solid or hollow viscous injury. Post-operative day 2 drain showed bilious content. Contrast Enhanced CT scan ruled out the solid or hollow viscous injury. Magnetic Resonance choledocopancreaticography (MRCP) done on day 4 was suggestive of isolated intrapancreatic common bile duct injury of American Association of Surgery for Trauma (AAST) grade V. Endoscopic Retrograde choledocopancreaticography (ERCP) with stenting was done. Stent removal was done after 12 weeks. The patient is asymptomatic at 1 year follow up.DiscussionDue to limitations of the conventional post trauma investigations like FAST and CECT abdomen, it is likely to miss the CBD injury in the early course. MRCP is a good noninvasive investigation to diagnose the biliary injury. ERCP is considered as the most appropriate tool for the diagnosis as well as therapeutic stenting.ConclusionHigh degree of suspicion is most important in diagnosis of the distal common bile duct trauma as imaging studies like FAST and CT scan can miss the same. MRCP is good noninvasive imaging tool to diagnose the biliary trauma, while ERCP is the best diagnostic and therapeutic tool with minimal post-operative morbidity.     

Endoscopic management for pancreatic injuries due to blunt abdominal trauma decreases failure of nonoperative management and incidence of pancreatic-related complications

Introduction

The actual benefit of endoscopic techniques in the non-operative management (NOM) of pancreatic injury is still unclear, with its role and effectiveness in the NOM of pancreatic injury remains defined and doubted. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and long-term results of endoscopic techniques in the NOM of blunt pancreatic injury, and to determine whether NOM can be performed safely for selective patients with pancreatic injury.

Patients and methods

The records and follow-up data of all patients with blunt pancreatic injuries over 16-year period from October 1, 1996, to September 30, 2012 at our department were retrospectively reviewed. Failure of NOM (FNOM) occurred if laparotomy was required after attempted NOM.

Results

132 patients (32% of all patients with blunt pancreatic injury) underwent NOM, including 58 who underwent endoscopic management (EM) and 74 who were observed without EM (NO-EM). FNOM of overall NOM was 20%, including 30% of NO-EM and 9% of EM. There was no significant difference in FNOM for NO-EM versus EM for grade I, however, a significant decrease in FNOM was noted with the addition of EM for grade II and III. EM was a statistically significant independent risk factor. Regular follow-up of 1 year showed that, for patients from grade I to III, 53 patients (42%) from operative management (OM) and 34 patients (46%) of the NO-EM developed various pancreatic-related complications, while only 15 patients (26%) of the EM developed such complications, and the difference was significant.

Conclusion

Application of strictly defined selection criteria for NOM and EM in patients with blunt pancreatic injury resulted in one of the lowest FNOM rates (9%) and pancreatic-related complications incidence (25%). Selective application of EM for hemodynamically stable patients with blunt pancreatic injury will extend the indications for, and improve success of NOM.     

脂肪细胞因子resistin在胰腺导管腺癌中的表达与临床意义

目的:探讨resistin在胰腺导管腺癌组织中的表达与临床意义。方法:采用免疫组化法检测45例胰腺导管腺癌组织中resistin的表达,结合临床病理特征进行分析。结果:resistin在胰腺导管腺癌组织中的阳性率为48.9%。高、中及低分化导管腺癌病人中的resistin阳性率分别为25.0%、39.3%及100%,有统计学差异(P<0.05)。按日本胰腺学会JPS分期,Ⅲ～Ⅳ期病人的resistin阳性率为66.7%,显著高于Ⅰ～Ⅱ期病人的22.2%(P<0.01)。resistin阳性病人术后无病生存期短于resistin阴性病人,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。Cox多因素分析表明,resistin表达阳性与肿瘤低分化是反映胰腺导管腺癌病人术后无病生存期的独立因素。结论:resistin可能与胰腺导管腺癌的发生、发展有关,其确切的分子生物学机制有待进一步研究。     

Arguments for an individualized closure of the pancreatic remnant after distal pancreatic resection

AIM:To analyze risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula(POPF) rate after distal pancreatic resection(DPR).METHODS:We performed a retrospective analysis of 126 DPRs during 16 years.The primary endpoint was clinically relevant pancreatic fistula.RESULTS:Over the years,there was an increasing rate of operations in patients with a high-risk pancreas and a significant change in operative techniques.POPF was the most prominent factor for perioperative morbidity.Significant risk factors for pancreatic fistula were high body mass index(BMI) [odds ratio(OR) = 1.2(CI:1.1-1.3),P = 0.001],high-risk pancreatic pathology [OR = 3.0(CI:1.3-7.0),P = 0.011] and direct closure of the pancreas by hand suture [OR = 2.9(CI:1.2-6.7),P = 0.014].Of these,BMI and hand suture closure were independent risk factors in multivariate analysis.While hand suture closure was a risk factor in the low-risk pancreas subgroup,high BMI further increased the fistula rate for a high-risk pancreas.CONCLUSION:We propose a risk-adapted and indication-adapted choice of the closure method for the pancreatic remnant to reduce pancreatic fistula rate.     

Blunt pancreatic trauma and pseudocyst: management of major pancreatic duct injury

When there is no major pancreatic duct injury or the injury involves only the distal duct, percutaneous drainage should be considered the primary therapeutic procedure for traumatic pancreatic pseudocyst. If the pseudocyst does not then resolve, endoscopic retrograde pancreatography should be performed to prove proximal duct injury. When the major pancreatic duct is disrupted but not obstructed, pancreatic duct stenting may avert surgical resection. If the major duct is obstructed, surgical resection is required.     

Nonoperative treatment of traumatic pancreatic duct disruption in children with an endoscopically placed stent

The presence of ductal injury is the main determinant of consequence and a cause of significant mortality and morbidity in children with blunt pancreatic trauma. Proper treatment must be initiated on the basis of accurate anatomic diagnosis of the type and location of the injury. Computed tomography is an insufficient method for the diagnosis of the type and location of pancreatic ductal injury. Endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP) is a reliable technique for determining the status of the pancreatic duct in children and may allow for definitive treatment of ductal injury by stenting in selected patients. There is only one study of 2 cases reporting therapeutic ERP with ductal stenting in children after blunt trauma. In this report, we present an 11-year-old child with pancreatic ductal injury who was diagnosed and treated endoscopically by stent placement, during ERP. The patient improved steadily and was discharged uneventfully. Endoscopic retrograde pancreatography may be a very useful diagnostic and treatment tool in the management of main ductal disruptions.