Multidetector–row CT angiography of renal artery stenosis in 50 consecutive patients: prospective interobserver comparison with DSA

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to establish the diagnostic value of multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) for detection and quantification of both main and accessory renal artery stenosis in patients with secondary hypertension. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty consecutive patients scheduled for DSA were considered candidates for MDCT angiography. In all patients, MDCT angiography of the abdominal aorta was performed before DSA. For the purpose of interpretation, the arteries were separately interpreted either with DSA or MDCT angiography in order to provide qualitative and quantitative information. For qualitative evaluation, one experienced reader graded the opacification of renal arteries as excellent, good or poor; for quantitative evaluation, MDCT and DSA were independently evaluated for the number of renal arteries and the presence, location and degree of stenosis in random order by three readers. On the basis of consensus readings, calculations of sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for detection of degree of stenosis were made by using DSA findings as the standard of reference. Interobserver variability was also assessed. RESULTS: With regard to qualitative analysis, arterial enhancement was considered excellent in 39 patients and good in 11. For quantitative analysis, 73 arteries were classified as normal with DSA. Although 72 of these were also classified as normal with CT angiography, one was overestimated by one grade; at DSA, 16 arteries were classified as moderately stenotic; in two arteries, there was an overestimation of one grade. Perfect correlation was achieved for the diagnosis of occlusion. In two patients, all three readers detected multiple severe stenoses on both modalities, with a "string-of-beads" appearance typical of fibromuscular dysplasia. Accessory arteries were correctly identified as such by all three readers on either DSA or MDCT. Levels of sensitivity, specificity and accuracy regarding degree of stenosis were 100%, 98.6% and 96.9%, respectively, with PPV and NPV of 97.6% and 100%, respectively. When we considered significant arterial stenosis (50%-100% luminal narrowing), sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 100%, 97.3% and 97.8%, respectively, with a PPV and NPV of 98.2% and 97.8%, respectively. For all observers, interobserver agreement was almost perfect (k=0.81-1) for both MDCT and DSA, with a k value between 0.82 and 0.95. CONCLUSIONS: MDCT angiography is very accurate and robust, even for the assessment of renal artery stenosis, and has the potential to become a viable substitute, in most cases, for diagnostic catheter-based DSA.     

肾动脉狭窄的三维增强磁共振血管成像诊断

目的:评价高分辨力三维增强磁共振血管成像术(3DCEMRA)对肾动脉狭窄的显示准确性。方法:对30例临床诊断或怀疑肾动脉狭窄患者进行高分辨力肾动脉3DCEMRA检查,分析所有患者的肾动脉和副肾动脉显示质量和病变显示情况,并与DSA做对照。结果:3DCEMRA显示了30例患者总共59支肾动脉主干(1例为单支移植肾动脉),显示率为100%。3DCEMRA显示4支副肾动脉,显示率100%。肾动脉段级分支的显示率为49%。所有病例在动脉显示区域内静脉均未显影或显影淡,对诊断不构成影响。DSA共显示59支肾动脉主干和4支副肾动脉(以63支计算),59支主干中2支闭塞,8支重度狭窄,11支中度狭窄,10支轻度狭窄,28支肾动脉主干和4支副肾动脉都正常。3DCEMRA除把2支轻度狭窄估为中度狭窄,1支中度狭窄估为重度狭窄外,其它结果都同DSA一致,故3DCEMRA显示肾动脉主干和副肾动脉狭窄程度超过50%的有血液动力学意义的明显狭窄的敏感性和特异性分别为100%和95%,阳性预测值为91%,阴性预测值为100%。结论:高分辨力肾动脉3DCEMRA能准确检出肾动脉主干和副肾动脉狭窄,并能较好判断其狭窄程度。     

Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR angiography: Diagnostic performance of four doses for detection and grading of carotid, renal, and aorto-iliac stenoses compared to digital subtraction angiography

PURPOSE: To determine the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE-MRA) with four doses of gadobenate dimeglumine for detection of significant steno-occlusive disease of the carotid, renal, and pelvic vasculature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-four patients with suspected disease of the renal (n = 16), pelvic (n = 41), or carotid (n = 27) arteries underwent CE-MRA (3D-spoiled gradient-echo sequences) at 1.5T. CE-MRA was performed with gadobenate dimeglumine at 0.025, 0.05, 0.1, or 0.2 mmol/kg (23, 24, 19, and 18 patients, respectively) administered at 2 mL/sec. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV, respectively) for detection of significant disease (>50% stenosis or occlusion for renal/pelvic arteries; >70% stenosis or occlusion for carotid arteries) was determined by three fully blinded, independent radiologists using conventional digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as reference standard. All comparisons were tested statistically (ANOVA, chi-square, and Mantel-Haenszel tests as appropriate) and reader agreement (kappa) was assessed. RESULTS: Values for accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV on CE-MRA were consistently higher for 0.1 mmol/kg gadobenate dimeglumine (accuracy = 95.2-97.3%, sensitivity = 84.2% (all readers), specificity = 96.9-99.2%, PPV = 80.0-94.1%, NPV = 97.6-97.7%). The greater accuracy of the 0.1 mmol/kg dose was significant (P < 0.01, all readers) compared to all other dose groups. Agreement between the three readers was good for all dose groups (kappa >/=0.58), with the highest percent agreement (85.7%) noted for the 0.1 mmol/kg dose. CONCLUSION: Significantly better diagnostic performance on CE-MRA of the renal, pelvic, and carotid arteries is achieved with a gadobenate dimeglumine dose of 0.1 mmol/kg bodyweight.     

Comparison of digital subtraction angiography with gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis

Renal artery stenosis (RAS) is a treatable cause of hypertension and renal failure for which no ideal screening technique is currently available. We evaluated the use of dynamic gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) for the diagnosis of RAS. Sixty-two patients with secondary hypertension were enrolled in the study. All patients had conventional renal angiography and gadolinium enhanced MRA. The sequence used was a 3D FMP SPGR sequence with the following parameters (TR: 26 ms, TE: 6.9 ms, flip angle 40 °, field of view 36 × 36 cm, matrix 246 × 256, 1 excitation). Gadolinium 0.3 mmol/kg was administered and 60 1.5-mm-thick partitions were obtained over a duration of 3.5 min. The MRA images were then compared with conventional digital subtraction angiography (DSA) images. Conventional DSA demonstrated 138 renal arteries, whereas gadolinium-enhanced MRA demonstrated 129 (93 %). Twenty-one renal artery stenoses and four occluded arteries were seen at conventional DSA. Gadolinium-enhanced MRA had a sensitivity of 88 %, specificity of 98 %, accuracy of 96 %, positive predictive value of 92 % and negative predictive value of 97 % when compared with conventional DSA. Gadolinium-enhanced MRA is an accurate technique for identifying patients with RAS. It is less sensitive in picking up accessory renal arteries. Received: 17 March 1998; Revision received: 30 June 1998; Accepted: 28 August 1998     

Carotid stenosis: a comparison between MR and spiral CT angiography

We performed a preliminary study comparing three-dimensional time-of-flight (3 D TOF) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and spiral CT angiography (SCTA) in the detection and assessment of internal carotid artery stenosis. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was the reference examination. We examined 20 patients with signs of cerebrovascular insufficiency, who underwent MRA, SCTA and DSA within a 3 day period. Both internal carotid arteries were assessed by three blinded readers for degree of stenosis at two different levels (bulb and remaining section) giving a total of 80 assessments. Interobserver variability, sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, concordance, overestimation and underestimation were assessed. Interobserver variability was not statistically significant. MRA showed higher sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy and concordance than SCTA (92.0 % vs 80.8 %, 98.2 % vs 96.4 %, 96.3 % vs 91.3 % and 96.0 % vs 88.0 %, respectively). MRA gave rise to a 5.0 % overestimation rate, whereas SCTA occasioned a 7.5 % underestimation rate. These differences are not statistically significant. These results suggest that MRA is a more useful, noninvasive modality for assessment of the internal carotid artery with a more than 70 % stenosis. Received: 8 August 1997 Accepted: 10 October 1997     

Evaluation of intracranial aneurysms with high-resolution MR angiography using single-artery highlighting technique: correlation with digital subtraction angiography

Purpose

The authors investigated the effectiveness of high-resolution magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) using a single-artery highlighting technique for the accurate diagnosis of intracranial aneurysms at 3.0 T in a large cohort of patients with suspected intracranial aneurysms against the current gold standard, i.e. cerebral angiography.

Methods

A total of 307 patients with suspected aneurysms were referred for three-dimensional time-of-flight MRA (3D-TOF-MRA) prior to digital subtraction angiography (DSA). We summarised patient-based, aneurysm-based and vessel-based diagnostic performance parameters, namely, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for detecting intracranial aneurysms with 3D-TOF-MRA. Interobserver agreement was calculated with the kappa (κ) statistic.

Results

Patient-based accuracy was 98.1%, sensitivity 99.5%, specificity 95.3%, PPV 97.6% and NPV 99% according to observer A; and 97.7%, 99.5%, 94.3%, 97.1% and 99%, respectively, according to observer B. Aneurysmbased accuracy was 98.3%, sensitivity 99.6%, specificity 95.2%, PPV 98.1% and NPV 99% according to observer A, and 98.0%, 99.6%, 94.3%, 97.7% and 99%, respectively, according to observer B. Vessel-based accuracy was 99.0%, sensitivity 99.6%, specificity 98.7%, PPV 97.8%, and NPV 99.7% according to observer A, and 98.9%, 99.6%, 98.5%, 97.3%, and 99.7%, respectively, according to observer B. Interobserver reading differences were not significant. The interobserver agreement was good, with a kappa (κ) value of 0.931 for patient-based evaluation, 0.934 for aneurysmbased evaluation and 0.953 for vessel-based evaluation.

Conclusions

Our results demonstrate the effectiveness of high-resolution MRA using a single-artery-highlighting technique for accurate diagnosis of intracranial aneurysms in a large cohort of patients with suspected aneurysms.     

Renal artery stenosis evaluated with 3D-Gd-magnetic resonance angiography using transstenotic pressure gradient as the standard of reference. A multireader study

PURPOSE: To evaluate 3D-Gd-magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) in detecting hemodynamically significant renal artery stenosis (RAS). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty patients evaluated for atherosclerotic RAS by MRA and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) were retrospectively included. Standard of reference for hemodynamically significant RAS was a transstenotic gradient of 15 mmHg. DSA visualized 60 main renal arteries and 9 accessory arteries. Pressure gradient measurement (PGM) was available from 61 arteries. Three radiologists evaluated all examinations independently in a blinded fashion. RESULTS: RAS was present in 26 arteries. On MRA, each reader identified 4 of 9 accessory renal arteries, a detection rate of 44%. The three readers correctly classified 22/25/22 of the 26 vessels with a significant gradient as > or =60% RAS and 31/25/32 of the 35 with no significant gradient as < 60% RAS on MRA. Interobserver agreement was substantial. MRA image quality was adequate for RAS evaluations in all patients. ROC curves indicated that MRA is an adequate method for evaluating RAS. When screening for RAS, a 50% diameter reduction cut-off is better than 60%. RAS with 40-80% diameter reductions accounted for 65% of discrepancies. CONCLUSION: MRA is an adequate method for evaluating RAS limited mainly by poor detection rate for accessory renal arteries.     

High-spatial-resolution 3D balanced turbo field-echo technique for MR angiography of the renal arteries: initial experience

PURPOSE: To compare a multislab balanced turbo field-echo magnetic resonance (MR) angiographic technique, without the use of a contrast agent, with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) for imaging of the renal arteries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five randomly selected patients (eight women and 17 men; age range, 27-88 years; mean age, 72 years) suspected of having renal artery stenosis underwent both DSA and balanced turbo field-echo MR angiography. A consensus result was obtained among three radiologists in evaluation of main renal arteries on balanced turbo field-echo images and DSA images. Sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values of the balanced turbo field-echo technique were calculated, and receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed for depiction of hemodynamically significant stenosis. Cohen kappa analysis was used to assess agreement between the two imaging methods in grading of stenoses and depiction of significant stenosis. Accessory renal arteries also were evaluated. RESULTS: Fifty main renal arteries and 11 accessory arteries were fully depicted with DSA. DSA depicted 11 stenotic lesions in the main renal arteries. In comparison, balanced turbo field-echo MR angiography enabled visualization of 46 of 50 main renal arteries to their first branching points and depicted 10 of 11 accessory arteries. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value of this technique for depiction of significant stenosis were 100% (four of four), 98% (41 of 42), 100% (41 of 41), and 80% (four of five), respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.988. kappa was 0.782 for grading of stenoses and 0.877 for depiction of significant stenosis. CONCLUSION: Multislab balanced turbo field-echo imaging has potential as an MR angiography technique for depiction of normal and diseased renal arteries.     

Renal arterial stenosis: prospective comparison of color Doppler US and breath-hold, three-dimensional, dynamic, gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography

PURPOSE: To compare color Doppler ultrasonography (US) with fast, breath-hold, three-dimensional, gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography in detecting renal arterial stenosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-five patients with clinical suspicion of renovascular disease were prospectively examined with intra- and extrarenal color Doppler US and breath-hold, gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Digital subtraction arteriography (DSA) was the standard of reference in all patients for the number of renal arteries and degree of stenosis. RESULTS: DSA depicted 103 arteries and 52 stenoses. Color Doppler US was nondiagnostic in two examinations. Significantly more of 13 accessory renal arteries were detected with MR angiography (n = 12) than with color Doppler US (n = 3; P <.05). For assessing all stenoses, the sensitivity and accuracy were 94% and 91%, respectively, for MR angiography and 71% and 76%, respectively, for US (P <.05). The sensitivity was higher for MR angiography (100%) than for US (79%; P <.05) in diagnosing stenoses with at least 50% narrowing. The specificity, accuracy, and negative predictive value in diagnosing stenoses of at least 50% narrowing were 93%, 95%, and 100% for MR angiography and 93%, 89%, and 90% for US. CONCLUSION: Breath-hold, gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography is superior to color Doppler US in accessory renal artery detection. Although the specificity of MR angiography is similar to that of color Doppler US, MR angiography has a better sensitivity and negative predictive value in depicting renal arterial stenoses.     

Renal arteriography using gadolinium enhanced 3D MR angiography--clinical experience with the technique, its limitations and pitfalls.

Gadolinium enhanced 3D MR angiography (MRA) is becoming a widely accepted technique for imaging the vascular system. We set out to evaluate its accuracy and reliability in visualization of renal arteries in the clinical setting. Gadolinium enhanced MRA was performed in 15 potential live renal donors and 26 patients suspected of having renal artery stenosis who were referred for digital subtraction angiography (DSA). MRA was performed on a 1.5 T MR scanner in a single breath hold. Images from each study were prospectively analysed for demonstration of number of main and accessory renal arteries and degree of renal artery stenosis in a double blind fashion. All the main and accessory arteries were visualized on MRA in the renal donor group, but in one case a branch was not identified owing to breathing artefact. In one case, an extrarenal vascular anomaly was not demonstrated on MRA. In the renal artery stenosis group, sensitivity, specificity and negative predictive values of 96%, 93% and 96% were obtained for clinically significant stenosis (>50%). Gadolinium enhanced MRA proved to be a useful technique in demonstration of renal arterial anatomy and grading of renal artery stenosis. However, we encountered some pitfalls and limitations of the technique during the process. It is important to be aware of these before accepting it as the sole technique in clinical practice.     

A multicenter, site-independent, blinded study to compare the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography using 1.0M gadobutrol (Gadovist) to intraarterial digital subtraction angiography in body arteries

PURPOSE: Prospective evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of single field-of-view contrast-enhanced MR Angiography (ceMRA) with 1.0M gadobutrol compared to intraarterial DSA in body arteries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In an European multicenter study 179 patients underwent ceMRA and DSA. For each indication five prospectively defined vessel segments were evaluated by local investigators onsite and by three site-independent blinded readers (BR) independently. RESULTS: The agreement between ceMRA and DSA diagnosis was statistically significant in the onsite (96.6%) and blinded reader (86.6-90.2%) evaluation. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) for detection of relevant stenosis (>50%) were calculated for the right and left internal carotid arteries, and common and external iliac arteries: Sensitivity was 95-98% (onsite) and 76-96% (BR), specificity 94-96% (onsite) and 86-94% (BR), accuracy 96% (onsite) and 87-93% (BR), NPV 98-99% (onsite) and 84-98% (BR), and PPV 79-93% (onsite) and 44-91% (BR), respectively. CONCLUSION: CeMRA of body arteries using 1.0M gadobutrol provides diagnostic information comparable to intraarterial DSA.     

Time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR angiography of renal artery stenosis: diagnostic accuracy and interobserver variability

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate diagnostic accuracy and interobserver variability of time-resolved three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography in the detection of renal artery stenosis in comparison with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography as the standard of reference. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Forty consecutive patients (age range, 25-81 years; mean, 62.9 +/- 11.9 years) with suspected renal artery stenosis underwent intraarterial digital subtraction angiography and gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography, performed on a 1.5-T system with fast low-angle shot three-dimensional imaging (3.8/1.49 [TR/TE], 25 degrees flip angle, 10-sec acquisition time, and 1.5-mm partition thickness). Three time-resolved phases were obtained in a single breath-hold. Digital subtraction angiography and gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography were evaluated by four observers who studied 80 main renal arteries and 19 accessory vessels to evaluate the degree of stenosis. A stenosis reducing the intraarterial diameter by more than 50% was regarded as hemodynamically significant. Interobserver variability was calculated. RESULTS: Only one gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography study was not of diagnostic quality, as a result of failure of the power injector. All main branches were of diagnostic quality in 38 (97.4%) of the remaining 39 gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography studies. Seventeen (89.5%) of 19 accessory renal arteries were depicted with gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. The overall sensitivity for significant stenoses was 92.9%. The overall specificity was 83.4%, and the overall accuracy was 85.9%. Interobserver variability of gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography exceeded that of digital subtraction angiography. CONCLUSION: Time-resolved three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography is a useful noninvasive method of screening suspected renal artery stenosis because of its easy application, short examination time, and high sensitivity despite of its higher interobserver variability.     

Assessment of coronary artery stent patency and restenosis using 64-slice computed tomography

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Restenosis remains a major limitation of coronary catheter-based stent placement. Therefore, a reliable noninvasive diagnostic method for the evaluation of stented coronary arteries would be highly desirable. Our aim was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of high-resolution 64-slice computed tomography (64SCT) in a pilot study for the assessment of the lumen of coronary artery stents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients underwent 64SCT of the coronary arteries and quantitative x-ray coronary angiography (QCA) after coronary artery stent placement. 64SCT coronary angiography was performed with the following parameters: spatial resolution = 0.4 x 0.4 x 0.4 mm; temporal resolution = 83-165 milliseconds; contrast agent = 80 mL at a flow rate of 5 mL/second; retrospective electrocardiogram gating. The 64SCT scans were evaluated for image quality and for the presence of significant in-stent and peri-stent (proximal and distal) stenoses. Determinations were made of the sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) of 64SCT for the detection or exclusion of stenoses. RESULTS: A total of 46 stents were evaluated, of which 45 (98%) were of diagnostic image quality. Significant in-stent restenosis or occlusion was detected on QCA in 8/45 cases (>/=50% stenosis = 6; occlusion = 2). The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, and NPV of 64SCT for the detection of significant in-stent disease was 75%, 92%, 89%, 67%, and 94%, respectively. Both occluded coronary artery stents were correctly identified. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy values of 64SCT for the detection of significant proximal peri-stent stenoses were 75%, 95%, and 93%, respectively, whereas the values for detection of significant distal peri-stent stenoses were 67%, 85%, and 84%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The high spatial and temporal resolution of 64SCT may permit improved assessment of stent occlusion and peri-stent disease, although detection of in-stent stenosis remains difficult.     

Accuracy of 3 T MR angioraphy in vertebral artery stenosis and coincidence with other cerebrovascular stenoses

Introduction

Ostium of vertebral artery (VA) is a common site of pseudostenosis on contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE-MRA). The purpose of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of CE-MRA at 3 T in the evaluation of ostial stenosis of VA and to find associated coincidental stenoses using logistic regression analysis.

Methods

One hundred and thirty-five VA ostial regions from 72 patients who received CE-MRA of neck vessels, intracranial time of flight (TOF) MRA, and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) were retrospectively reviewed. The sensitivity and specificity of the CE-MRA in detection of ostial stenosis were calculated with reference standard of DSA. Ostial stenosis on MRA was correlated with coincidental lesions in intracranial and cervical arteries by logistic regression analysis.

Results

The sensitivity and specificity of the CE-MRA were 100% and 80.4% for detection of significant stenosis. In case of significant stenoses, CE-MRA showed a tendency of overestimation with a false-positive rate of 52.5%. Logistic regression analysis showed that the stenoses of middle cerebral artery (MCA) on TOF MRA was associated with significant stenoses of VA ostia (OR?=?5.84, 95% confidence intervals 1.41–24.17).

Conclusion

CE-MRA is sensitive in detection of VA ostial stenosis although it has high false-positive rate. True positive ostial stenosis should be considered in cases of coincidental stenoses of MCA on TOF MRA.     

Preliminary experience with MRA in evaluating the degree of carotid stenosis and plaque morphology using high-resolution sequences after gadofosveset trisodium (Vasovist) administration: comparison with CTA and DSA

Purpose

The authors performed a preliminary study with blood-pool contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) in evaluating the degree of carotid artery stenosis and plaque morphology, comparing the diagnostic performance of first-pass (FP) and steady-state (SS) acquisitions with 64-slice computed tomography angiography (CTA) and using digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as the reference standard.

Materials and methods

Twenty patients with ≥50% carotid artery stenosis at Doppler sonography underwent blood-pool contrast-enhanced MRA, CTA and DSA. Two independent radiologists evaluated MRA and CTA examinations to assess the degree of stenosis and characterise plaque morphology. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for FP, SS and CTA. The McNemar and Wilcoxon tests were used to determine significant differences (p<0.05) between the diagnostic performance of the three modalities.

Results

Forty carotid bifurcations were studied. For stenosis grading, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were 90%, 89%, 90%, 89% and 90%, respectively, at FP; 95%, 95%, 95%, 95% and 95%, respectively, at SS; and 97.5%, 95%, 100%, 100% and 95%, respectively, at CTA. SS and CTA were superior to FP for evaluating the degree of stenosis (p<0.05). For evaluating plaque morphology, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were 87.5%, 89%, 86%, 85% and 90%, respectively, at FP; 97.5%, 100%, 95%, 95% and 100%, respectively, at SS; and 100%, 100%, 100%, 100% and 100%, respectively, at CTA. There were no significant differences between FP, SS and CTA for plaque assessment (p>0.05).

Conclusions

Blood-pool contrast-enhanced MRA with SS sequences allow improved diagnostic evaluation of the degree of carotid stenosis and plaque morphology compared with FP and is substantially equal to CTA and DSA.     

Time-resolved contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the carotid arteries: diagnostic accuracy and inter-observer variability compared with selective catheter angiography

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To assess the diagnostic accuracy and interobserver variability of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) in a time-resolved technique compared with digital subtraction angiography (x-ray DSA) in patients with suspected stenoses of the internal carotid artery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 43 patients were enrolled in this prospective study. All patients underwent selective x-ray DSA involving a total of 84 carotid arteries. CE-MRA was performed in a time-resolved technique with a fast gradient-echo sequence on a 1.5 T MR scanner: TR 3.8 milliseconds, TE 1.49 milliseconds. Four consecutive measurements, each a duration of 10 seconds, were performed with omission of measuring bolus transit time. Four independent radiologists scored the degree of stenosis. The interobserver variability was calculated for CE-MRA and x-ray DSA. RESULTS: In the 43 cases, at least one MRA measurement showed arterial contrast without venous degradation. Compared with x-ray DSA the mean sensitivity and specificity for grading stenosis > or = 70% were 98% and 86%, respectively. The interobserver agreement was substantial with no significant difference between CE-MRA (kappa value 0.794) and x-ray DSA (kappa value 0.786). CONCLUSIONS: The short acquisition time of a fast CE-MRA sequence allows a selective visualization of the internal carotid arteries without degradation from venous enhancement. It is a reliable method with a good interobserver agreement.     

Contrast-enhanced sonography in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis: comparison with MR-angiography

PURPOSE: To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of non-enhanced Colour-Doppler US and enhanced power-Doppler US in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis compared with breath-hold Gd-DOTA-enhanced MR-angiography. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) provided the gold standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 51 patients (19 women and 32 men, age ranging from 29 to 76 years) with clinical suspicion of renovascular hypertension underwent Colour-Doppler US of the renal artery; 11 subjects (21.6%) were excluded from the study as a complete and bilateral depiction of renal artery was not obtained. The remaining 40 subjects (14 women and 26 men) were investigated with power-Doppler US with time-intensity renal enhancement curve and with MR-Angiography. All of these subjects were also studied by DSA which provided the gold standard. RESULTS: As stated, in 11 of 51 patients the diagnostic work-up was not completed because the initial US examination failed to depict the renal arteries. DSA showed renal artery stenosis in 16 of the remaining 40 patients. The sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing stenoses were 75% and 79.1% for conventional colour-Doppler US, 100% and 87.5% for enhanced power-Doppler US and 100% and 91.6% for MR-angiography. CONCLUSIONS: MR-angiography is the most reliable technique in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis. The sensitivity and specificity of enhanced power-Doppler US are superior to those of colour-Doppler US. Although MR-Angiography enables a better evaluation of renal artery stenosis, the good diagnostic accuracy of enhanced power-Doppler US, its greater acceptance by the patients and its wider diffusion support the use of this technique in the screening of patients with clinical suspicion of renovascular hypertension.     

Evaluation of arterial bypass grafts of the pelvic and lower extremities with gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: comparison with digital subtraction angiography.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE MRA) with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in the assessment of patency and stenoses in bypass grafts. METHODS: Fifteen patients were examined with both CE MRA and DSA. Fifteen bypass grafts were evaluated by four readers for potential stenosis in five locations. The stenoses were classified in five types: 1 (0% to 24% stenosis), 2 (25% to 49%), 3 (50% to 74%), 4 (75% to 99%), and 5 (occlusion). RESULTS: Using both techniques, 70 of 75 evaluated locations (93.3%) were classified identically. This included six stenoses < 50% and six stenoses > 50%, respectively. Four of five overestimations of stenoses were scaled in DSA as stenoses type 1. One stenosis was categorized as type 3 in DSA. Sensitivity for CE MRA for detecting stenoses >or= 25% was 100% and the specificity 90%. Interobserver agreement for all evaluations was 0.77 (Spearman rank correlation test). CONCLUSION: In the assessment of low-grade stenosis in bypass grafts, CE MRA overestimates stenoses slightly but yields good results in comparison with DSA.     

Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the carotid and vertebrobasilar circulations

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE MRA) is a proven diagnostic tool in evaluation of the carotid arteries; however, few studies have addressed its accuracy in the vertebrobasilar system. The purpose of this study was to assess the sensitivity and specificity of CE MRA compared with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) for detection of vertebrobasilar disease. METHODS: Forty patients with suspected atherosclerotic disease of the carotid and vertebrobasilar circulations underwent CE MRA on a 1.5 T MR imaging scanner by use of a coronal 3D gradient-echo pulse sequence after intravenous injection of gadolinium diethylene triamine penta-acetic acid. All patients had correlative DSA within a 1-month period. CE MRA images were randomized and then independently assessed by 2 observers who were blinded to the DSA results. DSA examinations were analyzed in a similar manner. Each observer was asked to report the presence or absence of clinically significant stenosis (>50%), occlusion, fistula, aneurysm, and dissection. The MRA findings were then correlated with DSA. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of MRA for detection of disease in the entire carotid and vertebrobasilar systems were 90% and 97%, respectively; for the carotid system alone, the sensitivity and specificity were 94% and 97%, respectively; and for the vertebrobasilar system they were 88% and 98% respectively. The overall interobserver reliability was 98% (kappa = 0.92). CONCLUSION: CE MRA is accurate at detecting disease not only in the carotid vessels, but also in the vertebrobasilar circulation, and has the potential to provide a comprehensive and noninvasive evaluation of the head and neck arteries in a single study.     

Magnetic resonance angiography in suspected cerebral vasculitis

The purpose of this study was to determine the technical capacity and diagnostic accuracy of 3D time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) in suspected cerebral vasculitis in a retrospective analysis of MRA and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in 14 young patients with clinical and/or radiological suspicion of cerebral vasculitis. A total of nine arteries were evaluated in each patient. Consensus review of DSA by three observers was the reference standard. The sensitivity for detecting a stenosis varied from 62 to 79% for MRA and from 76 to 94% for DSA, depending on the observer. The specificity for detecting a stenosis varied from 83 to 87% for MRA and from 83 to 97% for DSA. Using the criterion more than two stenoses in at least two separate vascular distributions to consider the examination as being true positive, the false-positive rates for MRA and DSA were comparable. MRA plays a role as the first angiographical examination in the diagnostic work-up of suspected cerebral vasculitis. When more than two stenoses in at least two separate vascular distributions are depicted on MRA, DSA is not expected to add a significant diagnostic contribution in a patient with suspected cerebral vasculitis. DSA remains necessary when MRA is normal or when less than three stenoses are seen.