高血压患者服药依从性的影响因素及对策

目的对门诊高血压患者服药依从性差的原因进行分析,并提出对策。方法采用访谈式对260例高血压患者进行调查,分析影响服药依从性差的主要原因。结果206例患者服药依从性差。知识缺乏、药物不良反应、服药种类多及时间长、自我管理能力低是服药依从性差的主要原因。结论加强健康教育、预防药物不良反应、按阶梯合理用药、提高自我管理能力以及建立社区、家庭一体化防治系统是提高患者服药依从性的主要对策。     

Adherence to Antiretroviral Medication Regimens: A Test of a Psychosocial Model

Objective The primary aim of this study was to test a psychosocial model of medication adherence among people taking antiretroviral medications. This model was based primarily on social cognitive theory and included personal (self-efficacy, outcome expectancy, stigma, depression, and spirituality), social (social support, difficult life circumstances), and provider (patient satisfaction and decision-making) variables. Design The data for this analysis were obtained from the parent study, which was a randomized controlled trial (Get Busy Living) designed to evaluate an intervention to foster medication adherence. Factor analysis was used to develop the constructs for the model, and structural equation modeling was used to test the model. Only baseline data were used in this cross sectional analysis. Methods Participants were recruited from a HIV/AIDS clinic in Atlanta, GA. Prior to group assignment, participants were asked to complete a questionnaire that included assessment of the study variables. Results A total of 236 participants were included in the analysis. The mean age of the participants was 41 years; the majority were male, and most were African-American. In the final model, self-efficacy and depression demonstrated direct associations with adherence; whereas stigma, patient satisfaction, and social support were indirectly related to adherence through their association with either self-efficacy or depression. Conclusion These findings provide evidence to reinforce the belief that medication-taking behaviors are affected by a complex set of interactions among psychosocial variables and provide direction for adherence interventions.     

医院-社区综合管理模式对高血压患者控压效果及服药依从性的影响

目的探讨医院-社区综合管理模式对高血压患者控压效果及服药依从性的影响。方法选择2013年3月—2014年3月我院和社区卫生服务中心双向转诊中就诊的高血压患者500例,均采用医院-社区综合管理模式进行干预,比较干预前后患者服药依从性和血压变化。结果干预6个月后患者收缩压和舒张压低于干预前,Morisky问卷得分高于干预前(P0.05)。结论医院-社区综合管理模式能有效提高高血压患者的服药依从性,有利于改善控压效果。     

Improvement in Medication Adherence after Pharmacist Intervention Is Associated with Favorable Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis

Background/AimsAlthough pharmacist intervention for patients with chronic diseases has been shown to improve medication adherence, few studies have evaluated its effects on the objective clinical outcomes. We investigated the impact of pharmacist intervention on medication adherence and clinical outcomes in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC).MethodsPatients with UC and low medication adherence were divided into two groups, based on pharmacist intervention. Their medication possession ratio and nonadherence rate for 6 months before and after the baseline were investigated. The partial Mayo score, flare-up incidence, and factors influencing flare-up events for 1 year after the baseline were analyzed.ResultsOf 99 patients, 33 and 66 were included in the intervention and control groups, respectively. The nonadherence rate significantly declined in the intervention group 6 months after the baseline (60.6% before vs 30.3% after; p=0.013). The groups showed a significant difference regarding time-related partial Mayo scores (p=0.002). Intervention was significantly negatively correlated with time and the partial Mayo score (r²=0.035, p=0.013). A significant difference was observed in the flare-up incidence (33.3% in the intervention group vs 54.6% in the control group; p=0.046). Multivariate logistic regression indicated that pharmacist intervention (adjusted odds ratio, 0.370; 95% confidence interval, 0.145 to 0.945; p=0.038) independently reduced the flare-up risk.ConclusionsPharmacist intervention significantly decreased the nonadherence rate, improved the partial Mayo score, and reduced the flare-up incidence compared with the control group in a cohort of UC patients identified to have low medication adherence.     

Enhancing Medication Adherence Among Inner-City Children with Asthma: Results from Pilot Studies

Despite the availability of effective treatments that aid in controlling asthma symptoms, inner-city children with asthma have high rates of morbidity and are frequent users of emergency department services. The goal of these studies was to pilot test an intervention that used social learning strategies (e.g., goal-setting, monitoring, feedback, reinforcement, and enhanced self-efficacy) and targeted known barriers to individualize a family-based asthma action plan. Participants were 15 children with asthma, aged 7-12 years, who had been prescribed at least one daily inhaled steroid. The children and their mothers lived in inner-city Baltimore and all were African-American. Participants received up to five visits in their home by a nurse. Electronic monitors were installed on the children's MDI to provide immediate feedback on medication adherence to the families and validate medication use. At baseline, only 28.6% of the children were using their medications as prescribed. Within four weeks, the number of children who were using their medications appropriately doubled from 28.6% at baseline to 54.1% (90% increase; p = 0.004), while underutilization decreased from 51.2% to 25.4% (100% decrease; p = 0.02). The number of children with no medication use at all dropped from 28.3% at baseline to 15.1% by week 5 (87% decrease; p = 0.009). Thus, within four weeks, more than half the children were using their inhaled steroids appropriately. In addition, the rate of underutilization decreased and that of nonutilization was cut in half. Our initial data suggest that an individualized, home-based intervention can significantly enhance adherence to the daily use of inhaled steroids in inner-city children with asthma. Nevertheless, adherence to daily inhaled steroid therapy remains a significant problem in this group.     

A Randomized Encouragement Trial to Increase Mail Order Pharmacy Use and Medication Adherence in Patients with Diabetes

BackgroundMail order pharmacy (MOP) use has been linked to improved medication adherence and health outcomes among patients with diabetes. However, no large-scale intervention studies have assessed the effect of encouraging MOP use on medication adherence.ObjectiveTo assess an intervention to encourage MOP services to increase its use and medication adherence.DesignRandomized encouragement trial.Patients63,012 diabetes patients from three health care systems: Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC), Kaiser Permanente Hawaii (KPHI), and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care (HPHC) who were poorly adherent to at least one class of cardiometabolic medications and had not used MOP in the prior 12 months.InterventionPatients were randomized to receive either usual care (control arm) or outreach encouraging MOP use consisting of a mailed letter, secure email message, and automated telephone call outlining the potential benefits of MOP use (intervention arm). HPHC intervention patients received the letter only.MeasurementsWe compared the percentages of patients that began using MOP and that became adherent to cardiometabolic medication classes during a 12-month follow-up period. We also conducted a race/ethnicity-stratified analysis.ResultsDuring follow-up, 10.6% of intervention patients began using MOP vs. 9.3% of controls (p < 0.01); the percent of cardiometabolic medication delivered via mail was 42.1% vs. 39.8% (p < 0.01). Metformin adherence improved in the intervention arm relative to control at the two KP sites (52% vs. 49%, p < 0.01). Stratified analyses suggested a significant positive effect of the intervention in White (RR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.22) and Asian (RR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.17, 1.45) patients.ConclusionThis pragmatic trial showed that simple outreach to encourage MOP modestly increased its use and improved adherence measured by refills to a key class of diabetes medications in some settings. Given its minimal cost, clinicians and health systems should consider outreach interventions to actively promote MOP use among diabetes patients.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov registration number: {"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT02621476","term_id":"NCT02621476"}}NCT02621476KEY WORDS: diabetes, mail order pharmacy, medication adherence, encouragement trial     

Improving Medication Adherence through Graphically Enhanced Interventions in Coronary Heart Disease (IMAGE-CHD): A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background

Up to 50 % of patients do not take medications as prescribed. Interventions to improve adherence are needed, with an understanding of which patients benefit most.

Objective

To test the effect of two low-literacy interventions on medication adherence.

Design

Randomized controlled trial, 2 × 2 factorial design.

Participants

Adults with coronary heart disease in an inner-city primary care clinic.

Interventions

For 1 year, patients received usual care, refill reminder postcards, illustrated daily medication schedules, or both interventions.

Main Measures

The primary outcome was cardiovascular medication refill adherence, assessed by the cumulative medication gap (CMG). Patients with CMG < 0.20 were considered adherent. We assessed the effect of the interventions overall and, post-hoc, in subgroups of interest.

Key Results

Most of the 435 participants were elderly (mean age = 63.7 years), African-American (91 %), and read below the 9th-grade level (78 %). Among the 420 subjects (97 %) for whom CMG could be calculated, 138 (32.9 %) had CMG < 0.20 during follow-up and were considered adherent. Overall, adherence did not differ significantly across treatments: 31.2 % in usual care, 28.3 % with mailed refill reminders, 34.2 % with illustrated medication schedules, and 36.9 % with both interventions. In post-hoc analyses, illustrated medication schedules led to significantly greater odds of adherence among patients who at baseline had more than eight medications (OR = 2.2; 95 % CI, 1.21 to 4.04) or low self-efficacy for managing medications (OR = 2.15; 95 % CI, 1.11 to 4.16); a trend was present among patients who reported non-adherence at baseline (OR = 1.89; 95 % CI, 0.99 to 3.60).

Conclusions

The interventions did not improve adherence overall. Illustrated medication schedules may improve adherence among patients with low self-efficacy, polypharmacy, or baseline non-adherence, though this requires confirmation.KEY WORDS: coronary heart disease, medical adherence, medication management     

Medication adherence and its associated factors among Chinese community-dwelling older adults with hypertension

Objective

To investigate the factors that influence medication adherence in Chinese community-dwelling older adults with hypertension.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted with a convenience sample of 382 older adults with hypertension recruited from six health centers in Macao, China. Chinese versions of the Morisky 4-Item Self-Report Measure of Medication-Taking Behavior, Fear of Intimacy with Helping Professionals scale and Exercise of Self-care Agency scale were administered to participants.

Results

Participants older than 65 years (β = .118, p = .017), with a low level of education (β = .128, p = .01), who had more than one other common disease (β = .120, p = .015), were on long-term medication (β = .221, p < .001) and who reported higher self-care (β = .188, p = .001), had better medication adherence.

Conclusions

Health care professionals should consider these factors when planning medication regimens for Chinese older adults with hypertension, to enhance medication adherence and improve patient outcomes.     

Adherence to Pharmacological Thromboprophylaxis Orders in Hospitalized Patients

Objective

We compared adherence to unfractionated heparin (UFH) 2 or 3 times daily prophylaxis orders versus low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) once daily orders. Our goals were to determine which strategy demonstrated the best adherence in terms of timing and frequency of dose administration, and to determine reasons for ordered heparin not being administered.

Methods

We queried our electronic medication administration record where nurses document reasons for delayed administration or omitted doses. We identified 250 consecutive patients who were prescribed prophylaxis with UFH 2 or 3 times daily or LMWH once daily. We followed patients for their hospitalization to determine adherence to physicians' prophylaxis orders.

Results

Adherence, defined as the ratio of prophylaxis doses given to doses ordered, was greater with LMWH (94.9%) than UFH 3 times daily (87.8%) or UFH twice daily (86.8%) regimens (P <.001). Patients receiving LMWH more often received all of their scheduled prophylaxis doses (77%) versus UFH 3 times daily (54%) or UFH twice daily (45%) (P <.001). There were no differences between regimens regarding reasons for omitted doses. The most common reason for late or omitted doses was patient refusal, which explained 44% of the UFH and 39% of the LMWH orders that were not administered.

Conclusions

LMWH once a day had better adherence than UFH 2 or 3 times daily. For both LMWH and UFH, patient refusal was the most common reason for not administering prophylaxis as prescribed. These findings require consideration when evaluating pharmacological prophylaxis strategies. Educational programs, explaining the rationale, may motivate patients to improve adherence during hospitalization.     

Adherence to Long-Acting Inhaled Therapies among Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

Abstract

Background: Long-acting inhaled medications are an important component of the treatment of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), yet few studies have examined the determinants of medication adherence among this patient population. Objective: We sought to identify factors associated with adherence to long-acting beta-agonists (LABA) and inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) among patients with COPD. Methods: We performed secondary analysis of baseline data collected in a randomized trial of 376 Veterans with spirometrically confirmed COPD. We used electronic pharmacy records to assess adherence, defined as a medication possession ratio of ≥0.80. We investigated the following exposures: patient characteristics, disease severity, medication regimen complexity, health behaviors, confidence in self-management, and perceptions of provider skill. We performed multivariable logistic regression, clustered by provider, to estimate associations. Results: Of the 167 patients prescribed LABA, 54% (n = 90) were adherent to therapy while only 40% (n = 74) of 184 the patients prescribed ICS were adherent. Higher adherence to LABA and ICS was associated with patient perception of their provider as being an “expert” in diagnosing and managing lung disease [For LABA: OR = 21.70 (95% CI 6.79, 69.37); For ICS OR = 7.93 (95% CI 1.71, 36.67)]. Factors associated with adherence to LABA, but not ICS, included: age, education, race, COPD severity, smoking status, and confidence in self-management. Conclusions: Adherence to long-acting inhaled medications among patients with COPD is poor, and determinants of adherence likely differ by medication class. Patient perception of clinician expertise in lung disease was the factor most highly associated with adherence to long-acting therapies.     

Impact of an Adherence Intervention Program on Medication Adherence Barriers,Asthma Control,and Productivity/Daily Activities in Patients With Asthma

Objective. This study evaluated the impact of an asthma patient intervention program, with a focus on medication adherence on adherence barriers, asthma control, and productivity/daily activities. Methods. Patients ≥18 years old who were employed by a large Southeastern public school system, had ≥1 medical claim for asthma, and were taking ≥1 asthma medication were invited to participate in the study. The ASK-20, the Asthma Control Test (ACT), and a productivity questionnaire were administered before and after a 6-month period of intervention that involved the use of baseline ASK-20 results to create patient-specific reports on adherence barriers and talking points for care managers to use during the two outbound telephone calls addressing barriers identified. Patients also received three educational mailings. The ASK-20 is a brief, self-reported instrument developed to identify patient-specific barriers to medication adherence and to improve provider/patient communication about adherence. Results. Of 112 individuals who enrolled, 87 completed the program (77.7%). Participants' mean age was 48.2 years (SD = 10.5), and most were female (86.2%) and white (64.4%). The mean number of years with asthma was 17.5 (SD = 14.7); approximately one third (36.8%) of participants had had asthma for >20 years. The intervention was associated with a significant reduction in the number of adherence barriers (3.8 to 2.8; p = .0021) as well as improvement in asthma control as reflected in an increase in the percentage of participants with controlled asthma defined as having an ACT score > 19 (50.0% to 64.6%; p = .0285). Significant reductions in the mean number of days that housework or schoolwork was limited by asthma (p = .0059) and the mean number of days that family, social, or recreational activities were missed or limited because of asthma (p = .0185) were also observed. The majority of the participants (95%) rated the program as being good, very good, or excellent. Conclusion. Programs incorporating a clinical assessment tool such as the ASK-20 for identifying a broad range of risk factors for nonadherence and for developing patient-specific intervention may reduce adherence barriers and improved disease control and ability to perform daily activities in patients with asthma.     

Assessment of Psychological Factors Associated with Adherence to Medication Regimens Among Adult Patients with Asthma

Nonadherence with asthma medications is a significant problem associated with unnecessary functional limitations. The development of measures to assess psychological factors important to adherence with medication regimens among adult patients with asthma is described in the present report. The results indicated that the reliability and validity of the newly designed measures were adequate. Patients that did not perceive a need to take their medications as prescribed or those already taking their medications as prescribed had better pulmonary function. The results are discussed in terms of their implications for future studies, such as motivational interventions to enhance adherence with asthma medications.     

Association of Medication Adherence with Workplace Productivity and Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Asthma

Objective. Examine the association of medication adherence with workplace productivity and health-related quality of life (HRQL) in asthma patients. Methods. Adult patients with asthma in a state health insurance program identified from medical claims (July 2001–June 2003) were mailed a three-part survey to measure HRQL (St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire), workplace productivity (Workplace Productivity Short Inventory), and self-reported medication adherence (Morisky Scale). Results. The symptoms domain had the worst HRQL scores, followed by the activity and impacts domains; 39% of the participants reported themselves as “high” adherent, whereas 19% were “medium,” and 42% were “low” adherent. Asthma resulted in productivity losses of $597 ± $1,024 (absenteeism) and $658 ± $1,808 (presenteeism) per enrollee per year. Conclusions. Asthma was associated with HRQL detriments and workplace productivity losses.     

Effectiveness of mHealth Interventions in Improving Medication Adherence Among People with Hypertension: a Systematic Review

Purpose of Review

This study aims to systematically review existing evidence on the effectiveness of mobile health technology (mHealth) interventions in addressing medication adherence among people with hypertension.

Recent Findings

Twenty-one studies of mHealth interventions were included in the final review after systematic searching and screening of publications from 2000 to 2017 in PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase. Key features of the mHealth interventions include high intervention intensity, multifactorial components, and patient-centered approaches with tailored content and interaction. All studies found tendencies to improvement in medication adherence, but only 12 studies reported that the improvements were statistically significant in the intervention groups compared with the control groups. Twelve studies also found that mHealth interventions were beneficial for blood pressure control. None of the studies was conducted in a low-income country.

Summary

Our systematic review found evidence that mHealth interventions improved medication adherence and blood pressure control among people with hypertension. However, most studies were small in sample size and short in study duration, and not all results were statistically significant. Future research should focus on investigating the sustainability and generalizability of mHealth interventions.