Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for correction of rectourethral fistulae

BACKGROUND: Rectourethral fistula is a rare complication of radical prostatectomy. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is a minimally invasive technique available for its surgical correction, although currently, TEM is used more commonly for excision of adenomas and stage T(1) carcinomas of the rectum. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We report two patients with rectourethral fistulae after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in whom TEM was used for closure. The surgical procedure included microscopic full-thickness excision of the rectal wall around the fistula with a 1-cm margin and endoscopic suturing of the defect in the urethral and rectal walls. RESULTS: In one case, the rectourethral fistula was closed using TEM. In the other patient, the procedure, performed after failure of a graciloplasty, was difficult because of extensive scar tissue, and the fistula persisted. CONCLUSIONS: The TEM procedure is a minimally invasive technique that may be considered for surgical repair of rectourethral fistulae.     

Pedicled vastus lateralis musculofascial flap as a new technique for repairing rectourethral fistula after radical prostatectomy

We present a case of successful operative management of an iatrogenic rectourethral fistula with a pedicled vastus lateralis musculofascial flap. The fistula was created during radical prostatectomy operation. During the operation, it was deemed possible to spare this patient from a diverting colostomy and primarily repair a rectal injury. Postoperatively, however, a rectourethral fistula occurred, which was confirmed on retrograde urethrogram. A first attempt failed to close the fistula utilizing the transanal rectal flap advancement technique. A novel technique was attempted using a pedicled vastus lateralis musculofascial flap. This is the first report to our knowledge of repairing a rectourethral fistula with a pedicled vastus lateralis musculofascial flap. © 2011 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. Microsurgery, 2011     

Rectourethral fistula after radical prostatectomy: Transperineal repair in jack-knife position

Background: Rectourethral fistula is a rare complication of radical prostatectomy. Risk factors include history of pelvic irradiation, cryotherapy, intraoperative rectal injury or transurethral resection of the prostate. Diagnosis of rectourethral fistula requires a high index of suspicion, and complete work-up with endoscopy and imaging studies. The majority of patients require operative intervention, with approaches ranging from transabdominal, transrectal, transanal, and transperineal routes. Method: We report two patients with rectourethral fistula after radical prostatectomy. The first patient was a 59-year-old man who underwent an uncomplicated laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for early prostate cancer in another hospital. The second patient was a 64-year-old man who had local recurrence after cryotherapy for prostate cancer. He underwent salvage radical prostatectomy in a private hospital, which was complicated by intraoperative rectal injury. Results: In both patients, the rectourethral fistulae were successfully repaired with a transperineal approach in the prone jack-knife position. Conclusion: We found that the transperineal approach in the prone jack-knife position offered excellent exposure, allowed versatile surgical manoeuvres and produced successful repair with good continence outcomes.     

Transanal repair of rectourethral fistula after radical retropubic prostatectomy: a case report

A 65-year-old man underwent a radical retropubic prostatectomy for prostate cancer, and 5 days later fecaluria and serous diarrhea appeared suddenly. Cystourethrography domonstrated the flow of contrast material into the rectum through the fistula, so we diagnosed a rectourethral fistula. We first attempted conservative management, but the fistula did not close spontaneously. So we performed the transanal repair of rectourethral fistula about 2 months after surgery. This repair was effective, and the patient was alive without fistula recurrence at about 2 years after the repair surgery. This approach is simple and does not require a new incision, but it is only useful for low rectourethral     

Rectal injury during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Detection and management

Among 294 patients who underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP), five (1.7%) developed complications such as rectal injury (RI) and rectourethral fistula (RUF). In four patients, the RI was immediately repaired by placing two layers of uninterrupted sutures without fecal diversion. The RI in two of these four patients were diagnosed using a transrectally inserted Hegar uterine dilator (26 mm). The remaining patients, who presented with RUF as the primary manifestation, were conservatively managed, and the fistulas closed spontaneously. Most of the RI detected during the operation were managed with primary fistula closure without fecal diversion. In some cases of postoperative RUF, spontaneous closure may occur while the patient is waiting for surgical repair.     

Acquired rectourethral fistula: case report

Rectourethral fistulas are an uncommon complication of urinary or rectal surgery, trauma, inflammatory disease, radiation therapy for prostate cancer; they represent an unique challenge for the surgeon. Although closure can occure spontaneously, most cases of acquired rectourethral fistula need surgical repair. Despite a century of surgical experience, no single approach has been universally accepted. We report a case of a rectourethral fistula occurred in a 73 year-old man after a radical retropubic prostatectomy and external beam irradiation for prostate cancer, successfully treated with perineal approach.     

Conservative therapy of rectourethral fistula: five-year follow-up

A case of rectourethral fistula is described, occurring after radical prostatectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy for pathologic Stage C carcinoma of the prostate. Urethral instrumentation for stricture disease immediately preceded development of the stricture. Conservative management for five years has resulted in the development of osteomyelitis of the pubis, but with antibiotic suppression the patient remains active and asymptomatic. Predisposing factors for the development of rectourethral fistula following radical prostatectomy may include adjuvant radiotherapy and recurrent urethral instrumentation. Most patients will require definitive repair but occasionally a patient may be managed conservatively.     

How I do it: closure of tracheoesophageal puncture site.

BACKGROUND: Tracheoesophageal voice prosthesis is highly effective in providing speech after total laryngectomy. Although it is a safe method, tracheoesophageal fistulas occasionally need to be closed, usually at the request of the patient, because of leakage through an enlarging fistula. We present our technique for closure of tracheoesophageal fistula. METHODS: An incision is made at the mucocutaneous junction of the stoma from the 9 to the 3-o'clock position. Tracheoesophageal space is dissected down to and beyond the fistula. The tracheoesophageal tract is divided. The esophageal mucosa is closed with inverted sutures. After multiple layer closure of the esophageal fistula, the tracheal mucosa is closed with everted sutures. RESULTS: This technique has been used in nine patients. Eight were successful. The remaining patient had radiation therapy failure. CONCLUSION: This method of closure is simple and effective for those patients who require permanent closure of the tracheoesophageal fistula.     

Rectourinary fistula repair using the Latzko technique

PURPOSE: We report our experience with the Latzko technique for rectourinary fistula repair after radical retropubic prostatectomy and cystoprostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed 7 fistula repairs in 6 patients. The 1-stage procedure was based on a technique for vesicovaginal fistula closure with denudation of the rectal mucosa and multilayer closure of the fistulous tract. RESULTS: Closure was successful in all patients, although 1 had to undergo the procedure twice. There were no postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: The Latzko procedure is effective for rectourinary fistula repair and associated with minimal morbidity.     

Modified transanal rectosigmoidectomy for Hirschsprung's disease: clinical and manometric results in the initial 20 cases

Purpose

The authors describe a modified technique of primary transanal rectosigmoidectomy for Hirschsprung’s disease (HD), using a Swenson like procedure to perform the anastomosis between the colon and the rectum, and the preliminary results from this in children.

Methods

Twenty children, of whom, 90% were boys and 10% girls, 50% white and 50% nonwhite, aged 15 days to 10 years and with HD proven via biopsy, underwent a transanal pull-through procedure over a 29-month period. Postoperative follow-up ranged from 29 to 5 months. The proximal cut edge of the mucosal and submucosal cuff was tagged with multiple polypropylene 4-0 sutures, which were used for traction of the intestinal layers outside. The rectal mucosa was incised circumferentially using cautery, to perform rectal dissection approximately 1.5 cm from the dentate line, except in newborn case, in which the proximal cut edge was 0.5 cm from the dentate line. The dissection extended in an upward direction around the entire rectal circumference as far as the opening of the peritoneal reflection. The full thickness of rectum and sigmoid were mobilized outside through the anus, with division and coagulation of the rectal and sigmoid vessels using cautery or ligatures with cotton 4-0. The dissected colon then was divided above the transition zone, which was confirmed via full-thickness biopsy sections and with frozen section confirmation of ganglion cell presence. The authors performed a modified Swenson anastomosis technique, using a seromuscular polyglactin 4-0 separate-stitch suture. No drains were used.

Results

Normal bowel movements were displayed by all patients at the follow-up. All patients underwent a defecogram and anorectal computerized manometry at 3 months after surgery that showed an absence of stenosis and good anorectal sphincter muscle complex function. The incidence of complications in our series was 10%.

Conclusions

During the follow-up period of 29 months, all patients had normal bowel movements and normal anorectal manometric pressure profiles.     

Transsphincteric repair of rectourethral fistulas following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

Rectourethral fistula is a serious complication following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. We report our experience with a transsphincteric approach in the repair of this uncommon complication. The rectourethral fistula was repaired in a three-stage procedure comprising fecal diversion, transsphincteric repair of the fistula and, finally, closure of the stoma. Two patients with rectourethral fistulas underwent this procedure and the postoperative course was uneventful. In conclusion, a transsphincteric approach in the repair of rectourethral fistula by a three-stage procedure is safe and may be the treatment of choice.     

Tratamiento de las fístulas uretrorrectales tras prostatectomía radical mediante la interposición de material biológico vía perineal

IntroductionRectal injury is a rare complication after extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. The development of rectourethral fistulas (URF) from rectal injuries is one of the most feared and of more complex resolution in urology.Material and methodsBetween 2013 and 2020 we have operated on a total of 5 patients with URF after extraperitoneal endoscopic radical prostatectomy through a perineal access using the interposition of biological material. All fistulas had a diameter of less than 6 mm at endoscopy and were less than 6 cm apart from the anal margin.ResultsThe mean age of the patients was 64 years old. All patients had a previous bowel and urinary diversion for at least 3 months. Under general anesthesia and with the patient in a forced lithotomy position, fistulorraphy and interposition of biological material of porcine origin (lyophilized porcine dermis [Permacol®]) were performed through a perineal access. Mean operative time was 174 minutes (140-210). Most patients were discharged on the third postoperative day. The bladder catheter was left in place for a mean of 40 days (30-60). Prior to its removal, cystography and a Gastrografin® barium enema were performed, showing resolution of the fistula in all cases.ConclusionsThe interposition of biological material from porcine dermis through perineal approach is a safe alternative with good results in patients submitted to urethrorectal fistulorraphy after radical prostatectomy.     

Urinary fistulas following external radiation or permanent brachytherapy for the treatment of prostate cancer

PURPOSE: Prostate cancer (PCa) radiotherapy (RT), including brachytherapy, may lead to significant morbidity, including urinary fistulas. If conservative measures fail, urinary and/or fecal diversion is often required. In this study we examined a series of patients with fistulas that developed after pelvic radiation therapy and explored potential predisposing factors and treatment recommendations for refractory fistulas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were identified who received radiation therapy for PCa between 1977 and 2002, and subsequently had a fistula to the urinary tract. Patients were excluded who had diverticulitis, inflammatory bowel disease, a history of recent radical retropubic prostatectomy (possible iatrogenic etiology) or cancer in the excised fistula. Data were extracted from patient charts, mailed questionnaires and outside records. RESULTS: A total of 51 patients were identified with a history of radiation for PCa who subsequently had a urinary fistula. Of 20 patients meeting inclusion criteria 30% received external beam RT alone, 30% received brachytherapy and 40% received combined external beam RT/brachytherapy. Most fistulas (80%) were from the rectum to the urinary tract with an average diameter of 3.2 cm. Of patients with rectal fistulas 81% had a history of rectal stricture, urethral stricture, rectal biopsy, rectal argon beam therapy or transurethral prostate resection after radiation. All patients with rectourethral fistulas who achieved symptomatic resolution required urinary and fecal diversion. CONCLUSIONS: Conservative treatment is generally ineffective in the management of large urinary fistulas. Surgical intervention offers symptomatic relief and improved quality of life in most patients.     

Rectal flap advancement – a simple and effective approach for the treatment of rectourethral fistula

Objective Rectourethral fistula is a rare complication of prostatic surgery and other pelvic procedures. We report our experience of surgical repair of using a rectal advancement flap. Patients Three patients with rectourethral fistula following prostatic surgery were treated. Two patients had an anterior partial thickness of rectal flap advancement via a trans‐anal approach without urinary or faecal diversion. In one patient a rectal flap repair was performed through a posterior transsphincteric approach following urinary and faecal diversion. Results No significant postoperative complications occured. Healing was successful in each patient and faecal and urinary continence was normal. Conclusion Transanal rectal advancement flap is a simple and effective technique for the treatment of a rectourethral fistula with no need for urinary or faecal diversion.     

Iatrogenic recto-urethral fistula: perineal repair and buccal mucosa interposition

OBJECTIVE

To present a new and promising technique for repairing recto‐urethral fistulae (RUF) using a perineal approach and buccal mucosa graft interposition, as RUF are rare but severe complications of rectal or urinary tract surgery, radiation treatment, trauma or inflammation, and the repair of recurrent or persistent RUF is particularly difficult when previous surgical attempts have failed, resulting in high recurrence rates.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 2004 and 2006, five men (aged 61–67 years) with iatrogenic RUF had the perineal fistula closed using a buccal mucosa graft interposition. The RUF had developed after laparoscopic or retropubic radical prostatectomy in four patients and after radical cystectomy and ileal neobladder in the fifth. Four of the patients had had at least one failed RUF repair before their referral to our institution.

RESULTS

Four of the five RUF were repaired successfully using the perineal approach and buccal mucosa graft interposition. Failure occurred in one patient who had developed a RUF after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy followed by two unsuccessful attempts at closure. The failure was most probably due to a previously undetected postoperative perineal haematoma with infection.

CONCLUSION

Our perineal approach for repairing RUF, combined with buccal mucosa graft interposition, is a simple technique fulfilling all the requirements for successful fistula closure, especially in repeat surgery.     

Staging rectourinary fistulas to guide surgical treatment

PURPOSE: Surgical management for rectourinary fistulas remains a reconstructive challenge. There are few guidelines to direct the surgeon to the most successful and least morbid technique. We developed a rectourinary fistula staging system that allows selection of the most appropriate technique for the patient. We present the details of the staging system and surgical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From July 1999 to July 2005 we treated 14 male patients with rectourinary fistula. Mean patient age was 68 years (range 62 to 73). Etiology was rectal injury during open radical prostatectomy in 5 patients, laparoscopic prostatectomy in 1, radiation induced fistula for prostate cancer treatment (brachytherapy and external beam radiation therapy) in 2, neoadjuvant external beam radiation therapy in 2, ischial decubitus ulcer in 3 with spinal cord injury, and cryotherapy and external beam radiation therapy in 1. Cases were staged as stage I--low (less than 4 cm from anal verge and nonirradiated), stage II--high (more than 4 cm from anal verge and nonirradiated), stage III--small (less than 2 cm irradiated fistula), stage IV--large (more than 2 cm irradiated fistula) and stage V--large (ischial decubitus fistula). Diverting colostomy was performed for stages III to V 6 weeks before definitive therapy. RESULTS: Patients were discharged home after 48 hours. A 22Fr urethral catheter maintained bladder drainage for 3 weeks until cystogram confirmed rectourinary fistula closure. Complications were superficial wound infection and postoperative reexploration of the gracilis flap due to bleeding in 1 case each. All patients were cured after a single operation. CONCLUSIONS: The surgical challenges of a variety of rectourinary fistula repairs can be managed with minimal morbidity and a high success rate using proper staging to guide urinary tract reconstruction.     

Topographic anatomy of the male perineal structures with special reference to perineal approaches for radical prostatectomy

AIM: Although perineal approaches for radical prostatectomy have recently gained renewed attention as excellent methods for minimally invasive surgery, the most commonly used techniques, Belt's and Young's approaches, have inadequacies regarding the topographical relationship between the rectourethral and levator ani muscles. METHODS: Using macroscopic observations of sagittal slices of 27 male pelvises and smooth muscle immunohistochemical staining of semiserial sections of another eight pelvises, we investigated the topographical anatomy of the perineal structures and their interindividual variations in elderly Japanese men. RESULTS: The inferomedial edge of the levator ani was located 5-15 mm lateral to the midsagittal plane in an area between the urethra and the rectum. The rectourethral smooth muscle had a superoinferior thickness of 5-10 mm and occupied a space between the right and left levator slings. The levator was adjacent to, or continuous with, the striated anal sphincters. A thick connective tissue septum, composed of smooth muscle, was evident between the rectal smooth muscle and the anal sphincter-levator ani complex. CONCLUSION: Because the connective tissue septum guides the surgeon's finger upwards towards the rectoprostatic space, Belt's approach appears relatively easy; however, rectal injury can sometimes occur if the surgeon loses this guidance. In contrast, if the levator edge is identified as the first step in Young's approach, the rectourethral muscle can be precisely divided, leaving a 3-5-mm margin from the rectum and sphincter-levator complex. Clinical investigations are now required to modify Young's approach based on the present results.     

Long-term results of surgically treated traumatic rectourethral fistulas

OBJECTIVE: Rectourethral fistulas are uncommon, usually iatrogenic injuries that are demanding to treat. We present the challenging problems involving the treatment of rectourethral fistulas caused by war wounds. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the period 1991-1996, during the war in Croatia and Bosnia, six patients with rectourethral fistulas caused by war injuries were operated in our institution by the same surgeon. All patients were young males with a mean age of 24.6 years. In all patients, double diversion (diversion colostomy and cystostomy) was performed at the time of the injury in military hospitals. In three patients, multiple unsuccessful operations were performed in other institutions to close rectourethral fistula. We found urethrocystography and proctoscopy as the most reliable diagnostic studies and performed them in all patients. In first three patients, we performed transanal repair with anterior rectal wall advancement flap. Because it failed in all three patients, we performed York-Mason trans-sphincteric approach and anterior rectal wall advancement flap after which rectourethral fistula closed in all patients. Because of the satisfactory results, we performed the same procedure in other three patients. RESULTS: In all patients rectourethral fistula healed 2 months after the operation. Closure of diverting colostomy was performed after urethrocystography and proctoscopy proved that the rectourethral fistula has healed. There were no operative deaths and no major complications. Urethral stenosis developed in one patient and was successfully managed by dilatation. CONCLUSION: We believe that York-Mason trans-sphincteric approach offers straightforward access through healthy tissues and good fistula visualization. Anterior rectal wall advancement flap can easily be performed and offer good chances for definitive closure of the rectourethral fistula.     

Laparoscopic [correction of laproscopic] management of rectal injury during laparoscopic [correction of laproscopic] radical prostatectomy

PURPOSE: Rectal injury is a potential complication of radical prostatectomy. Because laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is still a challenging procedure, we review the incidence and management of rectal injury in 1,000 cases of consecutive laparoscopic radical prostatectomy performed at our institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of the first 1,000 laparoscopic transperitoneal radical prostatectomies performed between January 1998 and April 2002, 13 (1.3%) were complicated by rectal injury. Mean patient age was 66.5 years (range 58 to 76) and mean prostate specific antigen was 12.9 ng./ml. (range 2.9 to 26). Clinical stage was T1c, T2a and T2b in 5, 7 and 1 patient, respectively. Mean preoperative Gleason score was 5.8 (range 3 to 8). Once recognized the rectal defect was closed laparoscopically in 2 layers and tested for the absence of leakage. Broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics were given for 7 days. Oral liquids were started the day after surgery with a low residue diet, and a regular diet was started on postoperative day 5. Healing of the vesicourethral anastomosis was confirmed by voiding cystourethrogram on postoperative day 5. RESULTS: All patients underwent a non-nerve sparing procedure except 1 in whom unilateral neurovascular bundle preservation was done. Of 13 injuries 11 were diagnosed and repaired intraoperatively, and 2 were diagnosed postoperatively. Of the 11 cases of intraoperative diagnosis and repair 9 healed primarily without colostomy and peritonitis was diagnosed in the remaining 2 on days 3 and 4, respectively. Of the latter 2 patients 1 required repair of a small rectal defect without colostomy while the other required colostomy. Colostomy was performed in the 2 patients with delayed diagnosis on days 3 and 4 but even then a rectourethral fistula developed in 1, necessitating secondary repair. Average urethral catheterization time was 8.6 days for the 9 patients with an uneventful immediate postoperative course and mean hospital stay was 6.8 days. For the remaining 4 patients urethral catheterization duration was 12, 13, 15 and 120 days, and hospital stay was 7, 16, 21 and 27 days, respectively. There was no perioperative mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Rectal injury during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy requires meticulous intraoperative repair in 2 layers, which allows primary healing without diversion colostomy. For injury prevention scrupulous attention is required during non-nerve sparing radical prostatectomy, particularly at the posterior surface of the prostatic apex.     

Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: technique

PURPOSE: We have performed more than 250 radical prostatectomies using the da Vinci (Intuitive Surgical, Mountain View, California) surgical system. Our initial cases were done using the classic Montsouris approach. However, after gaining familiarity with the robot we modified our technique to reflect our experience with open radical retropubic prostatectomy. We detail the Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy technique that we currently use. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The robotic technique requires 2 teams, namely a skilled laparoscopic team at the patient and a skilled open surgeon at the console. Dissection is started anterior to the bladder and it continues extraperitoneally. The endopelvic fascia is opened and the dorsal vein complex is secured. The apex of the prostate is dissected free, releasing the neurovascular bundles at the apex. The bladder neck is then incised, and the seminal vesicles and vasa are transected. Posterior dissection is done within the posterior layer of Denonvilliers' fascia, preserving the neurovascular bundles and lateral prostatic fascia. The apex is transected and frozen sections are obtained from the parietal margins. Vesicourethral anastomosis is formed with 2 continuous sutures. RESULTS: In the last 100 cases mean operative time was 2.5 hours and average blood loss was 150 ml. (range 25 to 525 cc.). Median specimen Gleason score was 7 and mean tumor volume was 7 cc. Four patients had a positive surgical margin, which was focal in 3. Of the patients 95% were discharged home within 23 hours. Mean catheterization time was 4.2 days. CONCLUSIONS: Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy is a precise and safe minimally invasive technique of radical retropubic prostatectomy.