生命质量8条简明量表中文版开发及其性能评价

[目的]开发用于测量生命质量的8条目简明量表（SF-8）中文版本，并检验其信度和效度。[方法]采用翻译与回译两个步骤开发SF-8中文版本：采用现况调查用SF-8中文版本测量部分成都市居民生命质量，计算量表的内部一致性信度，并以SF-36为校标计算SF-8量表的校标效度，运用因子分析评价其结构效度。[结果]SF-8量表的克朗巴赫α系数为0．749；SF-8量表测量结果与SF-36的总分相关系数为0．559，各维度相关系数范围在0．339～0．539之间；因子分析共提取出3个公因子，即心理健康、生理健康和总体健康，累计贡献率为71．71％。[结论]SF-8量表具有较好的信度和效度，可以在中国人群中应用。但在应用时也要注意调查对结果灵敏度的要求。     

中国艾滋病病毒感染者生命质量测定量表的编制

目的编制用于测定中国HIV感染者生命质量的量表，评价其信度和效度。方法参考现有量表，并与相关专家、基层疾病预防控制人员、HIV感染者进行访谈以形成初始量表，在443例HIV感染者中试用。根据条目应答率、因子分析、相关系数矩阵、内部一致性分析等进行条目精简，形成最终量表。分析最终量表的信度和效度。结果形成的中国HIV感染者生命质量量表（QOL—CPLWHA）共44个条目。各维度没有严重的天花板效应和地板效应（最高为21．0％），内部一致性信度系数均≥0．70，全量表的为0．90。量表总分2周重测信度系数为0．80，有2个维度的重测信度系数低于0．6，4个维度的在0．6～0．7之间。各条目的成维率均为100％。量表总得分与SF-36总得分的spearman相关系数为0．69。结论所形成的QOL—CPLWHA量表首次引入了敌意心理趋势维度。量表具有较好的内部一致性信度、结构效度及内容效度等，可应用于中国HIV感染人群。     

SF-36量表在浙江省麻风治愈者中的应用

目的探讨健康调查量表SF-36在浙江省麻风治愈者中应用的信度、效度和可行性。方法以问卷访谈的形式调查892名麻风治愈者，用分半信度、内部一致性、构想效度和结构效度等指标对SF-36量表进行评判。结果该量表具有良好的内部一致性，8个维度的Chronbach’a系数均≥0．8。除心理健康（MH）外，各维度的分半信度较好，Pearson相关系数均≤0．7。构想效度比较满意。因子分析产生两个因子，能解释总方差的62．05％，且除精神影响（RE）外其他各维度在相应因子有较满意的因子载荷量（≥0．4）。结论SF-36量表基本适用于麻风治愈者生活质量评价，但部分条目需进行调整。     

修改后的SF-36健康调查应用于老年人群的评价

目的 评价修改后的SF-36健康调查表在老年人群中的信度和效度。方法 采用面对面访谈形式调查老年人使用修改后的SF-36的情况，并与老年人生活质量调查内容的结果进行比较。结果 修改后的SF-36条目得分满足量表设计者确定的假定顺序；各标度的Cronbach＇s α系数是0．73～0．91。其中65～75岁组的信度好于〉75岁组老年人群；各年龄组的不同标度与总测量的关系满足原设计者的假定关系；修改后SF-36的两个总测量与老年人生活质量调查内容的一致性均较好。结论 修改后的SF-36健康调查具有良好的信度和效度，更适合于老年人群使用。     

SF-36在中国HIV感染者中应用的信度和效度

[目的]探讨36条目简明量表（SF-36）在中国人类免疫缺陷病毒（HIV）感染者中应用的信度和效度.[方法]用SF-36对344名HIV感染者进行调查,对结果进行统计分析.[结果]各个维度内部一致性性度较好,克朗巴赫α系数都大于0.7.重测信度系数有4个维度低于0.7,其中在躯体功能（PF）维度低于0.6.除了总体健康成维率为94.3%外,其他维度中各条目的成维成功率均为100%.SF-36的8个维度均可以区分HIV感染者及与其具有相似经济文化背景的普通农村居民.急性感染和无症状潜伏期的感染者,在8个维度的得分明显高于出现综合征和典型疾病期的病人.[结论]SF-36用于测量中国HIV感染者的生命质量时,具有可接受的信度和效度.     

中文版SF-36量表在浙江省老年人群健康生命质量评价中的信度和效度

目的 评价中文版SF-36量表在老年人群健康生命质量评价中的信度和效度.方法 2007年10-12月统一受训的调查员使用含中文版SF-36量表的问卷对浙江省城乡4241名60周岁以上的老年人面对面询问式调查,采用相关分析、信度分析、因子分析、t检验和方差分析等统计学方法 评价量表的信度和效度.结果 中文版SF-36量表具有较好的分半信度(r=0.91,P<0.001),内部一致性信度α系数除生命活力(α=0.65)、社交功能(α=0.65)、心理健康(α=0.40)维度外,其余维度的α系数均>0.8.每个条目跟相关维度的相关系数均>0.4(条目9-2除外),且高于该条目与其他维度的相关系数(条目9-8除外),说明中文版SF-36量表有良好的集合效度和区分效度.35个条目在提取的6个公因子中的分布与量表的理论结构假设基本一致,累计贡献达67.04%.除心理健康维度外,各维度具有良好的判别效度.结论 中文版SF-36量表有较好的信度和效度,适用于老年人群健康生命质量评价,但量表心理健康维度的信度与效度较低,且其中的9-2、9-8以及躯体功能维度中的3-1条目不适合于中国老年人群.     

SF-12量表用于农村老年人群的信度、效度研究

目的评估SF-12量表用于评价农村老年人群生存质量的信度和效度。方法采用分半信度、内部一致性信度评估SF-12量表的信度,采用集合效度、区分效度和结构效度评估SF-12生存质量量表的效度。结果 SF-12量表评价农村老年人群生存质量的分半信度系数为0.725,内部一致性信度Cronbach'sα系数为0.767;8个维度的集合效度定标试验成功率为100%,区分效度定标试验成功率为96.4%;对量表的理论模型进行验证性因子分析,所得模型与原始假定一致,拟合指标结果为RMSEA=0.039,NNFI=0.980,CFI=0.989,AGFI=0.974。结论 SF-12量表基本适用于农村老年人群的生存质量评价,但个别条目需进行适当的调整。     

SF-36量表应用于外来勤杂人员健康调查的信度和效度

目的评价SF-36量表在高校外来勤杂人员的信度和效度。方法采用SF-36生存质量量表，由经过统一培训的调查员对广州市某高校133名外来勤杂人员进行面对面现场测试，计算8项内容的评分，分析信度和效度。结果量表中除社会功能（0．69）外，其余各项维度Cronbach，a系数大于0．70；集合效度和区分效度较好；因子分析产生2个公共因子，解释65．13％的方差。结论SF-36量表具有较好的信度与效度，适于评价高校外来勤杂人员的生存质量。     

冠心病患者中文版SF-36和QOL-35量表的相关分析

目的 了解两种量表(SF-36和QOL-35)对生活质量分析的一致性.方法 2008年6月至2009年4月北京协和医院心内科就诊并进行冠状动脉造影的冠心病患者或可疑冠心病患者781例,采用中文版SF-36和QOL-35量表对患者的生活质量进行测量,并收集患者的一般人口学资料和临床资料.对SF-36和QOL-35量表结果进行简单相关分析和典型相关分析.结果 781例患者SF-36总得分为62.63±12.47,QOL-35总得分为62.70±9.69.简单相关分析显示SF-36总分和QOL-35总分(r=0.725,P＜0.01),SF-36生理机能和QOL-35独立生活能力(r=0.933,P＜0.01),SF-36精神健康和QOL-35心理健康(r=0.132,P＜0.01),SF-36社会功能和QOL-35社会功能(r=0.215,P＜0.01)之间均具有相关性.典型相关分析显示SF-36和QOL-35之间相关性显著(r=0.946,P＜0.01).结论 SF-36和QOL-35在评价冠心病患者生活质量总体水平一致.     

SF-36量表评价新疆图瓦成人生命质量的信度效度

目的评价SF-36生活质量量表用于测量新疆图瓦成人生活质量的信度和效度。方法采用多阶段抽样的方法,于2016年在新疆阿勒泰地区哈巴河县白哈巴村和布尔津县喀纳斯、禾木村,随机抽取了437名图瓦成年人作为调查对象(男性227人,女性210人;18～29岁占30.66%、30～49岁占54.00%、≥50岁占15.33%)。使用SF-36量表评价生命质量,用内部一致性信度和折半信度评价量表信度;采用集合效度、区分效度和结构效度评价量表的效度。结果 SF-36量表的Cronbach’α系数为0.838,删除相应维度后的Cronbach’α系数均0.750。Spearman-Brown系数为0.828。集合、区分效度定标试验成功率分别为100%和99.59%。将35个条目纳入探索性因子分析,用最大平衡化旋转法提取7个公因子,累计贡献率为68.97%。将8维度纳入探索性因子分析,提取2个公因子,累计贡献率为66.44%。验证性因子分析模型拟合结果不理想。结论 SF-36量表用于评价新疆图瓦成年人生活质量有良好的信度、集合与区分效度,结构效度有待提高。     

Reliability and validity of the Norwegian version of the Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire

The aim of this study was to validate the Norwegian version of a self-administered 30-item quality of life questionnaire designed to assess disorders of excessive sleepiness, the Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ). In total 226 patients previously evaluated for obstructive sleep apnea were included in the study. The patients received a postal questionnaire with the FOSQ, the Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire, and a scale for assessment of excessive daytime sleepiness, the Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS). Among the 178 respondents, all five subscales of the FOSQ showed good internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.84-0.93). Test-retest on average 18 days apart was satisfactory with intraclass correlation coefficients ranging from 0.61 to 0.86. The pattern of Spearman's rank correlation coefficients between FOSQ scales and related and unrelated scales SF-36 scales gave support to the construct validity of the FOSQ. In conclusion, the Norwegian translation of the FOSQ showed satisfactory internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability and construct validity, in line with the original version.     

299例人类免疫缺陷病毒感染者生命质量的调查

目的用定性访谈和36条目简明量表（short form-36,SF-36）定量调查的方法研究人类免疫缺陷病毒（human immunodeficiency virus,HIV）感染者的生命质量,评价HIV感染者的敌意心理趋势。方法在四川、湖北和贵州抽取299例HIV感染者,用SF-36调查其生命质量,并进行信度效度分析。对感染者和防治人员进行访谈,以了解感染者目前最关注的内容。SF-36曾用于与本次调查对象具有相似经济文化背景的四川普通农村居民（1603例）,将两次调查的结果进行比较。通过与相关专家及防治人员进行小组讨论,设计7个条目以评价感染者的敌意心理趋势。结果SF-36共有8个维度,各维度内部一致性信度系数范围0．75～0．90,重测信度系数范围0．54～0．80（40例）。条目与其维度的相关系数范围为0．46～0．97。HIV感染者各个维度平均得分在28．50～77．87之间,四川普通农村居民各个维度平均得分在70．27～91．87之间,各维度得分经Mann-Whitneytest检验,U值在-17．43～-23．87之间,P值均〈0．01。评价敌意心理趋势的7个条目平均得分范围为46．21～82．89。结论HIV感染带来生命质量的严重恶化。SF-36可用于HIV感染者生命质量的研究。     

Validation of the Job Content Questionnaire in hospital nursing staff

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the reliability and construct validity of the three dimensions of the Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ): demand, control and job support among hospital nursing staff. METHODS: The minimun reduced version of the JCQ was used, which include three dimensions: psychological demands (9 items), job control (9 items) and job support (11 items). Validity was assessed in a random sample of 330 nursing staff from two general hospitals in the province of Alicante (Spain). The reliability of the questionnaire was evaluated after re-interviewing a subsample of 50 nurses 15 days after the first interview. Construct validity was evaluated by calculating correlations between the three dimensions of the JCQ obtained after factorial analysis with the burnout scale and six dimensions of the 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36) questionnaire. RESULTS: Factorial analysis revealed that the version of the JCQ validated in this study had the same factorial structure as the original questionnaire. The intraclass correlation between the first and second interview was high for each of the three dimensions (between 0.83 and 0.87). Cronbach's alpha was also high (between 0.74 and 0.88). A moderate but significant correlation was found between the three JCQ dimensions and the burnout scale: (-0,27 for job support, 0.31 for psychological demands and -0.12 for job control). A moderate correlation was also found for some SF-36 dimensions. CONCLUSION: The factorial structure of the JCQ was similar to that proposed by the author in the context of Spanish culture. The reliability and internal consistency of each of the three dimensions was high while construct validity was moderate.     

Case-finding for depressive and exhausted mood in the general population: reliability and validity of a symptom-driven diagnostic scale. Results from the prospective MONICA/KORA Augsburg Study

PURPOSE: Depressed and exhausted mood warrants epidemiological scrutiny as a cardiovascular risk factor. We evaluated the reliability and validity of a symptom-driven diagnostic scale. METHODS: To assess a depressed mood, items were derived from an extended battery of psychosocial questionnaires in a population-based study including 11,949 subjects aged 25 to 74 years. RESULTS: Eight items from the 24-item von Zerssen checklist were extracted by factor analysis resulting in an approximately normally distributed scale (range 0-24; mean=8.23, SD 4.76). Median for men was 8.00 and 10.00 for women. Its internal consistency was high (Cronbach's alpha 0.88). Test-retest reliability of a sub-sample was 0.83. Determining concurrent validity, correlation coefficients against a single depression questionnaire in 8237 subjects (p < 0.001) and SF-36 subscales (vitality and mental health) (both p < 0.0001) in 4226 subjects proved to be significant. Construct validity was confirmed by significant associations (all p < 0.001) with sleeping complaints, social isolation, and unhappiness. Test values for men above the 80th percentile exhibited significant hazard ratios for subsequent total mortality (80th percentile: HR 2.17, 95% CI: 1.31-13.55). CONCLUSION: The scale comprises eight items describing motivational depletion, decreased vitality, irritability, and an anxious mood with sufficient internal and external reliability, concurrent and construct validity. Its normal distribution allows a graduated analysis of different thresholds. The instrument may be particularly useful to identify exhausted and depressed mood of otherwise apparently healthy subjects in the general population.     

A psychometric comparison of health-related quality of life measures in chronic liver disease

Four generic [the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP-68), Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), EuroQol instrument (EQ-5D), COOP/WONCA charts], two domain-specific health-related quality of life measures [the sexuality scale of the HIV Overview Problems Evaluating System (HOPES), Multi-dimensional Fatigue Index (MFI-20)], and a self-developed 12-item symptom index were compared in terms of feasibility, test-retest reliability, internal consistency reliability, construct validity, and known groups validity in patients with chronic liver disease. All instruments could be completed within 10 min and exhibited a good psychometric performance in patients with chronic liver disease. The SF-36 and the MFI-20 performed relatively best in terms of reliability, construct validity, and discriminative ability. The sexuality scale of the HOPES demonstrated a relatively poor performance, as the missing value rate was higher than 5%. Further research is needed into the sensitivity to important clinical changes of the instruments.     

Psychometric Assessment of the Multidimensional Quality of Life Questionnaire for Persons with HIV/AIDS (MQOL-HIV) in a Sample of HIV-Infected Women

Since the late 1980s, several HIV-specific quality of life instruments have been developed; however, little testing has been done in terms of their validity and reliability for HIV-infected women. The purpose of this study was to test the content validity, concurrent validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability of the Multidimensional Quality of Life Questionnaire for Persons with HIV/AIDS (MQOL-HIV) in a sample of 85 HIV-infected women. The MQOL-HIV is a 40-item scale comprised of 10 dimensions. Most of the items and all of the domains were determined content valid but revision of some of the items and domains is recommended. Concurrent validity was measured between the MQOL-HIV and the MOS-HIV and ranged from 0.51-0.81 between similar domains. Of the 10 domains and the entire instrument, 7 had a Cronbach's alpha over 0.70 (range 0.43-0.92). Eight domains and the entire instrument achieved test-retest correlation coefficients over 0.70 (range 0.60-0.96). Although some revision may make the scale more content-valid for HIV-infected women, given due care in the interpretation of results, the MQOL-HIV can be used with female populations in its current form.     

SF-36健康调查量表中文版的研制及其性能测试

目的 研制SF-36健康调查量表中文版并验证量表维度建立及记分假设、信度和效度。方法 采用多阶段混合型等概率抽样法,用SF-36健康调查量表中文版对1000户家庭的居民进行自评量表式调查;参照国际生命质量评价项目的标准程序,进行正式的心理测验学试验。结果 在收回的1985份问卷中,18岁以上的有效问卷1972份,其中应答者1688人(85．6％),1316人回答了所有条目,372人有1个或以上的缺失答案,无应答者中文盲、半文盲占65．5％。等距假设在活力(VT)和精神健康(MH)维度被打破了,按重编码后值计算维度分数;条目集群的分布接近源量表及其他2个中文译本;除了生理功能(PF)、躯体疼痛(BP)、社会功能(SF)维度,其余维度有相似的标准差;除了SF、VT维度,其余6个维度条目维度相关一致;除了SF维度,7个维度集合效度成功率范围为75％～100％,,区分效度成功率范围为87．5％～100％。一致性信度系数除了SF、VT维度,其余6维度变化范围为0．72～0．88,满足群组比较的要求。两周重测信度变化范围为0．66～0．94。因子分析产生了2个主成分,分别代表生理健康和心理健康,解释了56．3％的总方差。结论 为SF-36健康调查量表适用于中国提供了证据,已知群效度试验将为量表效度提供更有意义的证据。